wetland delineation report

Wetland Delineation Report

DTE Gas Company

10” Lincoln-Traverse City Loop Pipeline Traverse City-Alpena Reinforcement Project

Project No. 115495

8/22/2019

Case No.: U-20640 Exhibit: A-1, Appendix A Witness: C. M. Paquette

Page: 1 of 264

Wetland Delineation Report

prepared for

DTE Gas Company 10” Lincoln-Traverse City Loop Pipeline

Traverse City-Alpena Reinforcement Project Traverse City, MI

Project No. 115495

Final 8/22/2019

prepared by

Burns & McDonnell Michigan, Inc. Chicago, Illinois

COPYRIGHT © 2019 BURNS & McDONNELL MICHIGAN, INC.


Page: 2 of 264

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Page No.

1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 1-1

2.0 METHODS......................................................................................................... 2-2 2.1.1 Existing Data Review ........................................................................... 2-2 2.1.2 Wetland Delineation ............................................................................. 2-2

3.0 RESULTS .......................................................................................................... 3-4 3.1 Existing Data Review .......................................................................................... 3-4 3.2 Wetland Delineation ............................................................................................ 3-5

3.2.1 Wetlands ............................................................................................... 3-6

3.2.2 Streams .................................................................................................. 3-8

4.0 SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... 4-10

5.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................ 5-11

APPENDIX A - FIGURES APPENDIX B –WETLAND DETERMINATION DATAFORMS

APPENDIX C – PHOTOLOG


Page: 3 of 264

LIST OF TABLES

Page No.

Table 3-1: Wetland Types and Sizes ....................................................................................... 3-6 Table 3-2: Stream Types and Lengths ..................................................................................... 3-8


Page: 4 of 264

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

Abbreviation Term/Phrase/Name

Burns & McDonnell Burns & McDonnell Michigan, Inc.

DTE DTE Gas Company

EGLE Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy

FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency

GPS Global Positioning System

MIRIS Michigan Resource Inventory System

NHD National Hydrography Dataset

NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service

NWI National Wetlands Inventory

OHWM Ordinary High Water Mark

PEM Palustrine emergent

PFO Palustrine forested

Project 8” Lincoln-Traverse City Loop Pipeline

PSS Palustrine scrub-shrub

USACE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

USDA U.S Department of Agriculture

USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service

USGS United States Geological Survey


Page: 5 of 264

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Burns & McDonnell Michigan, Inc. (Burns & McDonnell) was retained by DTE Gas Company (DTE) to

conduct a wetland delineation for the proposed nine mile, 10-inch diameter natural gas pipeline, the 10”

Lincoln-Traverse City Loop Pipeline (Project), in Paradise Township, East Bay Township, Blair

Township, and Garfield Township Grand Traverse County, Michigan (Figure 1, Appendix A). The

pipeline will commence near the DTE Gas’ crossing of the DTE Energy’s Gas Storage & Pipeline’s 24”

gathering header and end at the existing DTE Gas Traverse City Gate Station. This Project also includes

an expansion of the existing DTE Frankfort Junction Station and upgrades to the existing DTE Traverse

City Gate Station.

The Project is being proposed as part of DTE’s overall Traverse City-Alpena Reinforcement Project

which is being completed to strengthen the existing natural gas supply sources to the Traverse City area

and ensure minimal customer disruptions during routing and emergency situations. The Project has the

potential to impact wetlands or other waterbodies that may be under the jurisdiction of the Clean Water

Act.

This wetland delineation consisted of a desktop review and field investigations. The desktop review

included a background data review to identify potential waters of the U.S. that could be affected by the

Project. Field investigations for the Project were conducted May 28 through May 31 and July 16 through

17, 2019 to identify the location and extent of waters/wetlands that would be affected by the Project

(Survey Area). The Survey Area, which varied in width, averaged 175 feet wide and encompassed

approximately 226 acres. The Survey Area also included additional temporary workspaces, rail and road

crossings, access roads, and laydown yards. The proposed construction right-of-way is 75-feet wide and is

wholly contained within the Survey Area. One portion of the Survey Area was not surveyed due to a

reroute after initial surveys were completed. This report describes the methods and results of the wetland

delineation.


Page: 6 of 264

2.0 METHODS

The following sections summarize the methods used to complete the desktop review of existing data and

to conduct the field investigation within the Survey Area.

2.1.1 Existing Data Review Burns & McDonnell reviewed existing background information for the Project prior to conducting the

field investigations. Information reviewed included the following:

• U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute topographic map (Lake Ann, Grawn, Kingsley, and

Mayfield quadrangles, 1985, Jacks Landing, and Walton Quadrangles, 1986)

• National Hydrography Dataset (NHD)

• U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map

• Michigan Resource Inventory System (MIRIS) map

• Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) flood insurance rate map

• U.S. Department of Agricultural (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Soil

Survey for Grand Traverse County

• ESRI World Imagery Map Service aerial photography

These data provide indications of the potential for jurisdictional waters/wetlands to exist within the

Survey Area. Data from these sources were also overlaid on Project maps (Appendix A) to assist the

wetland scientists with the field investigations.

2.1.2 Wetland Delineation Burns & McDonnell wetland scientists completed the wetland delineation according to methods described

in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Wetlands Delineation Manual (1987 Manual) and the

2012 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Northcentral and

Northeast (Version 2.0) (Regional Supplement). Sample plots were established at multiple locations, and

Wetland Determination Data Forms from the Regional Supplement were completed to characterize

vegetation, soil, and hydrologic indicators at each of these sample plots. Wetland Determination Data

Forms are provided in Appendix B. Plant identification and nomenclature are based on the National

Wetland Plant List (Lichvar et al. 2016). The National Wetland Plant List assigns a wetland indicator

status for plant species to characterize the likelihood for it to occur in a wetland. Locations of sample

plots and other identified features were surveyed using a sub-meter accurate Global Positioning System

(GPS) unit. Photographs taken at each sample plot and stream are included in Appendix C.


Page: 7 of 264

Streams were identified based on the presence of a defined bed and bank and an ordinary high water mark

(OHWM). Stream types were determined by observing the depth of the stream channel from the OHWM

and the depth of water observed in the channel. Streams with substantial water flow at the time of the site

visit were classified as perennial. Streams with a limited depth from the OHWM and a limited flow were

classified as intermittent. Streams with a defined bed and bank but no water present likely flow only

during and following rain events and were classified as ephemeral.


Page: 8 of 264

3.0 RESULTS

The following sections summarize results of the desktop evaluation and field investigations.

3.1 Existing Data Review The USGS topographic quadrangle maps depict the site as an area that is somewhat flat with several steep

slopes present throughout the Survey Area (Figure 2, Appendix A). Several unnamed NHD mapped

streams are located throughout the Survey Area. The southern portion of the Survey Area drains into the

Boardman River, a perennial stream.

Portions of the Project are located within the FEMA floodplain of the Boardman River (Figure 3,

Appendix A). The USFWS NWI and MIRIS data identify five wetlands within the Survey Area (Figure 3,

Appendix A). NWI and MIRIS wetlands include four palustrine forested wetlands (PFO4B) and one

palustrine scrub shrub (PSS1) wetlands. The NWI and MIRIS identified wetlands are located throughout

the Survey Area.

The NRCS soil data indicate that there are 45 soil map units within the Survey Area (Figure 4, Appendix

A). Six of these soil map units are included on the national hydric soil list, which identifies soils that are

typically found in wetlands. These are:

Non-hydric soils within the Survey Area include:

• Croswell loamy sands, 0-2 % slopes, overwash (CoA) • Emmet sandy loam, 6-12 % slopes (EyC) • Emmet sandy loam, 6-12 % slopes, moderately eroded (EyC2) • Emmet sandy loam, 12-18 % slopes (EyD) • Emmet sandy loam, 18-25 % slopes (EyE) • Emmet sandy loam, 25-45 % slopes (EyF) • Guelph-Nester loams, 0-2 % slopes (GxA) • Guelph-Nester loams, 2-6 % slopes, moderately eroded (GxB2) • Guelph-Nester loams, 6-12 % slopes, moderately eroded (GxC2) • Guelph-Nester loams, 12-18 % slopes, moderately eroded

(GxD2) • Guelph-Nester loams, 25-35 % slopes, moderately eroded (GxF2) • Iosco-Ogemaw loamy sands, 0-2 % slopes (IsA)

• Carlisle muck, 0-2 % slopes, cool (Lu) • Richter, Tonkey, and Pinconning loams, 0-2 % slopes (RrA) • Roscommon mucky loamy sand (Ru) • Rubicon sand, 0-6 % slopes (RwB) • Tawas-Roscommon complex (Ta) • Tonkey mucky sandy loam (Tm)


Page: 9 of 264

• Kalkaska loamy sand, 0-2 % slopes (KaA) • Kalkaska loamy sand, 0-2 % slopes, moderately eroded (KaA2) • Kalkaska loamy sand, 2-6 % slopes (KaB) • Kalkaska loamy sand, 6-12 % slopes (KaC) • Kalkaska loamy sand, 6-12 % slopes, moderately eroded (KaC2) • Kalkaska loamy sand, 12-18 % slopes (KaD) • Kalkaska loamy sand, 18-25 % slopes (KaE) • Kalkaska sand, 0-2 % slopes (KbA) • Kalkaska sand, 6-12 % slopes (KbC) • Leelanau-Kalkaska loamy sands, 0-2 % slopes (LkA) • Leelanau-Kalkaska loamy sands, 2-6 % slopes (LkB) • Leelanau-Kalkaska loamy sands, 6-12 % slopes (LkC) • Leelanau-Kalkaska loamy sands, 6-12 % slopes, moderately

eroded (LkC2) • Leelanau-Kalkaska loamy sands, 12-18 % slopes (LkD) • Leelanau-Kalkaska loamy sands, 18-25 % slopes (LkE) • Leelanau-Kalkaska loamy sands, 18-25 % slopes, moderately

eroded (LkE2) • Leelanau-Kalkaska loamy sands, 25-45 % slopes (LkF) • Leelanau-Kalkaska loamy sands, 25-45 % slopes, moderately

eroded (LkF2) • Mancelona gravelly sandy loam, 2-6 % slopes (MaB) • Mancelona gravelly sandy loam, 6-12 % slopes (MaC) • Richter loams, 0-2 % slopes, overwash (RcA) • Rubicon sand, 0-2 % slopes (RwA) • Ubly-Nester complex, 12-18 % slopes (UnD) • Ubly-Nester complex, 18-25 % slopes, moderately eroded

(UnE2) • Water (W) • Wind eroded land, sloping (WdC) • Wind eroded land, strongly sloping (WdD)

3.2 Wetland Delineation Burns & McDonnell wetland scientists conducted the field investigations of the Survey Area on May 28

through May 31 and July 16 through July 17, 2019. The Survey Area was primarily composed of forest

and open fields. Vegetation in wetlands included species such as northern white cedar (Thuja

occidentalis), quacking aspen (Populus tremuloides), pussy willow (Salix discolor), speckled alder (Alnus

incana), field horsetail (Equisetum arvense), and red raspberry (Rubus ideaus). Vegetation in uplands

included species such as sugar maple (Acer saccharum), black cherry (Prunus serotina), red maple (Acer

rubrum), autumn olive (Eleagnus umbellata), eastern bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum), and trout lily

(Erythronium americanum).


Page: 10 of 264

Typical upland soils were light brown (10YR 3/3) to dark brown (10YR 3/2) and sandy in texture.

Typical wetland soils were characteristic of northern peatland wetlands, very black in color (2.5Y 2.5/1)

or very light brown (10YR 6/1) and mucky peat or sandy in texture. Common indicators of hydrology

included surface water, a high water table, saturation, hydrogen sulfide odor, a concave geomorphic

position, and a positive FAC-Neutral test. A total of 20 wetlands and 10 streams were identified during

the delineation. The following sections describe the types and quantities of the delineated features.

3.2.1 Wetlands A total of 20 wetlands were delineated within the Survey Area covering a total of 15.12 acres (Figure 5,

Appendix A). Wetland types delineated consisted of palustrine emergent (PEM), palustrine scrub shrub

(PSS), and palustrine forested (PFO). Many of the wetlands were part of a multi type wetland complex.

A summary of all wetlands identified during the field investigations, the wetland type, wetland

community type, and total area delineated is included in Table 3-1 below, and a description of delineated

wetland community is provided in the following sections.

Table 3-1: Delineated Wetlands within the Survey Area

Wetland ID Wetland Typeb Wetland Community Typea Acres

Delineated Page

Number (Figure 5)

W-1 PSS Northern Shrub Thicket 0.01 1 W-2 PEM Northern Wet Meadow 0.12 12, 13 W-2 PFO Floodplain Forest 0.75 12, 13 W-3 PSS Floodplain Forest 0.01 12 W-4 PEM Northern Wet Meadow 0.003 12 W-5 PEM Northern Wet Meadow 1.07 11, 12 W-5 PFO Rich Conifer Swamp 3.84 11, 12 W-6 PEM Northern Wet Meadow 0.47 3 W-6 PFO Rich Conifer Swamp/Floodplain Forest 0.53 3 W-6 PSS Rich Conifer Swamp/Floodplain Forest 0.06 3 W-7 PFO Rich Conifer Swamp 0.07 3 W-8 PEM Northern Wet Meadow 0.45 10 W-9 PFO Hardwood Conifer Swamp 3.21 10 W-10 PEM Northern Wet Meadow 0.23 11 W-10 PFO Rich Conifer Swamp 0.51 11 W-11 PEM Emergent Hillside Seep 0.04 11 W-12 PEM Emergent Hillside Seep 0.02 11


Page: 11 of 264

Wetland ID Wetland Typeb Wetland Community Typea Acres

Delineated Page

Number (Figure 5)

W-13 PSS Northern Shrub Thicket 0.07 9 W-14 PEM Northern Wet Meadow 0.13 10 W-14 PFO Hard-Wood Conifer Swamp 1.08 10 W-15 PEM Emergent Hillside Seep 0.03 5 W-16 PFO Floodplain Forest 0.55 12 W-17 PEM Northern Wet Meadow 1.10 2 W-17 PFO Hardwood-Conifer Swamp 0.33 2 W-18 PFO Hardwood Conifer Swamp 0.08 9 W-19 PFO Hardwood Conifer Swamp 0.27 13 W-20 PFO Hardwood Conifer Swamp 0.09 12, 13

TOTAL: 15.12

(a) Cohen et al. 2014. Michigan Natural Features Inventory Field Guide - Community Types (b) Cowardin et al. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States

3.2.1.1 PEM Wetlands A total of 3.66 acres of PEM wetlands were delineated, many of which were located in depressional areas

or along streams, and part of complexes that also contained PFO and PSS wetlands. Common vegetation

in PEM wetlands included reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea), red raspberry, sensitive fern

(Onoclea sensibilis), and field horsetail. The PEM wetlands were commonly characterized as high-quality

northern wet meadows. This wetland community type is considered high quality due to the high level of

plant diversity and abundance in this area. Hydric soil was indicated by the presence of histosol, hydrogen

sulfide odor, sandy redox, and redox dark surfaces. Wetland hydrology was indicated by the presence of

surface water, high water table, saturation, hydrogen sulfide odor, water stained leaves, geomorphic

position, and a positive FAC-Neutral test.

3.2.1.2 PSS Wetlands A total of 0.14 acres of PSS wetlands were delineated, many of which were located along streams and

also part of a wetland complex containing PFO or PEM wetlands. Common vegetation in PSS wetlands

included sandbar willow (Salix interior), quacking aspen, gray dogwood (Cornus racemosa), fox sedge

(Carex vulpinoidea), and lance-leaf aster (Symphyotrichum lanceolatum). The PSS wetlands were

commonly characterized as high-quality northern shrub thickets. This wetland community type is

considered high quality due to the high level of plant diversity and abundance in this area. Hydric soil was

indicated by the presence of histosol, hydrogen sulfide odor, and redox dark surfaces. Wetland hydrology

was indicated by the presence of surface water, high water table, saturation, hydrogen sulfide odor, water


Page: 12 of 264

stained leaves, oxidized rhizospheres on living roots, geomorphic position, and a positive FAC-Neutral

test.

3.2.1.3 PFO Wetlands A total of 11.32 acres of PFO wetlands were delineated, many of which were located along streams and

part of a wetland complex comprised of multiple wetland types. Common vegetation in PFO wetlands

included quacking aspen, northern white cedar, swamp cottonwood (Populus heterophylla), reed canary

grass, and New England aster (Symphyotrichum novae-angilae). The PFO wetlands were commonly

characterized high-quality rich conifer swamps and floodplain forests. These wetlands are considered

high quality due to their unique plant communities and abundance in this area. Hydric soil was indicated

by histosol, hydrogen sulfide odor, sandy redox, and redox dark surfaces. Wetland hydrology was

indicated by the presence of surface water, high water table, saturation, hydrogen sulfide odor, oxidized

rhizospheres on living roots, water-stained leaves, geomorphic position, and a positive FAC-Neutral test.

3.2.2 Streams A total of 10 streams were delineated within the Survey Area covering a total of 4,250 linear feet. Types

of streams delineated include ephemeral, intermittent, and perennial. A summary of the types of streams

and the total length of each type delineated is included in Table 3-2 below, and a description of each flow

regime is provided in the following sections.

Table 3-2: Delineated Streams within the Survey Area

Stream ID Flow Regime Stream Length

Delineated (Feet)

Width at the Ordinary High

Watermark (feet)

Page Number (Figure 5)

S-1 Intermittent 2,214 3 12, 13 S-2 Intermittent 18 2 12 S-3 Perennial (Boardman River) 414 60 12 S-4 Intermittent 231 3 3 S-5 Intermittent 221 1.5 9 S-6 Intermittent 469 4 9 S-7 Intermittent 195 2 10 S-8 Ephemeral 80 1 5 S-9 Ephemeral 233 2 2 S-10 Ephemeral 171 2 12

TOTAL: 4,250


Page: 13 of 264

3.2.2.1 Ephemeral Streams A total of three ephemeral streams were delineated, totaling approximately 486 linear feet within the

Survey Area. Ephemeral streams were characterized by a defined bed and bank but had limited or no flow

during the delineation. Ephemeral streams typically carry water only during and after precipitation events.

The bankfull width of ephemeral streams were approximately one foot wide on average when measured

from the ordinary high water mark (OHWM). Riffles and runs were generally not present in ephemeral

streams, and they generally contained less than 5 inches of water. Substrates frequently consisted of sand,

gravel, and cobble. These streams were often located in depressional areas within PFO or PEM wetlands,

and/or drained into intermittent or perennial streams.

3.2.2.2 Intermittent Streams A total of six intermittent streams were delineated, totaling approximately 3,350 feet within the Survey

Area. Intermittent streams were characterized by a defined bed and bank that have flowing water during

periods of the year when upstream waters are flowing. The bankfull widths of intermittent streams were

approximately two foot wide on average when measured from the OHWM. Riffles and runs were

occasionally observed, and substrates frequently consisted of sand, gravel, and cobble. Intermittent

streams generally contained between five and twelve inches of water.

3.2.2.3 Perennial Streams One perennial stream, the Boardman River, was delineated totaling approximately 415 linear feet within

the Survey Area. The Boardman River was characterized by a defined bed and bank with substantial flow

throughout most of the year. Riffles and runs were observed throughout the Boardman River. The

substrate of the Boardman River consisted of cobble, gravel, sand, silt, and some boulders.


Page: 14 of 264

4.0 SUMMARY

Burns & McDonnell conducted a wetland delineation to identify potentially jurisdictional waters and

wetlands in the Survey Area May 28 through May 31 and July 16 through July 17, 2019. Burns &

McDonnell identified a total of 20 wetlands (15.12 acres), the majority of which are classified as forested

wetlands (11.32 acres). Other types of delineated wetlands include PEM and PSS. A total of ten streams,

4,250 linear feet, were delineated. The majority of streams were intermittent (3,350 linear feet) with one

perennial stream, the Boardman River, totaling 415 linear feet, also delineated. Three ephemeral streams

were also delineated.

This delineation this report represents the professional opinion of potentially jurisdictional wetlands and

waterbodies within the Survey Area. To receive an official notice of the location and extent of waters of

the U.S. within the Survey Area, this report should be submitted to the USACE and the Michigan

Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE) to request a jurisdictional determination.

Additionally, permanently or temporarily impacting any of the identified wetlands or waterbodies will

require coordination with the EGLE and/or the Army Corps of Engineers Detroit District.


Page: 15 of 264

5.0 REFERENCES

Cohen, J. G., Kost, M. A., Slaughter, B. S., and Albert, D. A. 2014. A Field Guide to the Natural

Communities of Michigan. 1st Edition. Michigan State University Press.

Cowardin, L. M., Carter, V., Golet, F. C., and LaRoe, E. T. (1979), Classification of wetlands and

deepwater habitats of the United States, FWS/OBS-79/31, Reprinted 1992, U.S. Fish and Wildlife

Service, Washington, DC

Lichvar, R.W., D.L. Banks, W.N. Kirchner, and N.C. Melvin. 2016. The National Wetland Plant List:

2016 wetland ratings. Phytoneuron 2016-30: 1-17. US Army Corps of Engineers, Washington,

D.C.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2011. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland

Delineation Manual: Northcentral and Northeast Region (Version 2.0), ed. J. S. Wakeley, R. W.

Lichvar, C. V. Noble, and J. F. Berkowitz. ERDC/EL TR-12-1. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army

Engineer Research and Development Center.


Page: 16 of 264

APPENDIX A - FIGURES


Page: 17 of 264

ATTACHMENT 1 – Vicinity Map Phase I


Page: 18 of 264

Serv

ice

Laye

r Cre

dits

: Esr

i, G

arm

in, G

EBC

O, N

OA

A N

GD

C, a

nd o

ther

con

tribu

tors

CO

PYR

IGH

T ©

201

9 B

UR

NS

& M

cDO

NN

ELL

MIC

HIG

AN, I

NC

.

Source: Esri, and Burns & McDonnell Michigan, Inc. Issued: 9/20/2019

Path

: \\b

mcd

\dfs

\Clie

nts\

TND

\DTE

Enr\1

1549

5_TC

ARP

\Stu

dies

\Geo

spat

ial\D

ataF

iles\

ArcD

ocs\

WD

R\T

CA

RP_

WD

R_L

inco

lnTr

aver

se_O

verv

iew.

mxd

kd

boat

right

9/

20/2

019

")

")

")

Lake Michigan

WexfordCounty

LeelanauCounty

GrandTraverseCounty

Antrim County

Fenton State

Che

rry

25th

Four

Mile

Gar

field

4th

Traverse

Blac

kman

Wil l

i am

s bu r

gEl

k La

ke

UV113

UV186

UV37

UV22

UV72

£¤31

£¤131

Buckley

Kingsley

FifeLake

Greilickville

Interlochen

ChumsCorner

Grawn

Cedar

Traverse City

Silver LakeRecreation Area

WhitewaterTownship

Park

Traverse CityGate Station

Blair toLincoln-Traverse

Interconnect

FrankfortCheck MeterStation

Figure 1Overview Map

Phase I10” Lincoln-Traverse City Loop Pipeline

Traverse City-Alpena Reinforcement Project (TCARP)

DTE Gas Company (DTE)

NORTH

3 0 31.5

Scale in Miles

Proposed Route

Stations") Expansion") New") Upgrade


Lincoln-Traverse City Tie-In

FrankfortJunction


Page: 19 of 264

ATTACHMENT 2 – Topographic & NHD Map Phase I


Page: 20 of 264

CO

PYR

IGH

T ©

201

9 B

UR

NS

& M

cDO

NN

ELL

MIC

HIG

AN, I

NC

.

Source: Esri,USGS-National Hydrography Dataset (NHD), and Burns & McDonnell Michigan, Inc. Issued: 9/20/2019

Path

: \\b

mcd

\dfs

\Clie

nts\

TND

\DTE

Enr

\115

495_

TCA

RP

\Stu

dies

\Geo

spat

ial\D

ataF

iles\

Arc

Doc

s\W

DR

\TC

AR

P_W

DR

_Lin

coln

Trav

erse

_Top

o.m

xd

kdbo

atrig

ht

9/20

/201

9

NORTH

0 1,000500

Scale in Feet

")

Jaxon Cree

k

Blair toLincoln-TraverseInterconnect

Gran

d Tra

vers

e Co. 5

43

21

Figure 2Topographic & NHD Map



DTE Gas Company (DTE)Page 1 of 5

Access Road

Proposed Route

Surveyed Area

Unsurveyed Area

NHD Flowline

NHD Waterbody

Stations

") Expansion

") New

") Upgrade

Serv

ice

Laye

r Cre

dits

: © O

penS

treet

Map

(and

) con

tribu

tors

, CC

-BY-

SA, C

opyr

ight

:© 2

013

Nat

iona

l Geo

grap

hic

Soc

iety

, i-c

ubed



Page: 21 of 264

CO

PYR

IGH

T ©

201

9 B

UR

NS

& M

cDO

NN

ELL

MIC

HIG

AN, I

NC

.


Path

: \\b

mcd

\dfs

\Clie

nts\

TND

\DTE

Enr

\115

495_

TCA

RP

\Stu

dies

\Geo

spat

ial\D

ataF

iles\

Arc

Doc

s\W

DR

\TC

AR

P_W

DR

_Lin

coln

Trav

erse

_Top

o.m

xd

kdbo

atrig

ht

9/20

/201

9

NORTH

0 1,000500

Scale in Feet

Boardman River

Gran

d Tra

vers

e Co. 5

43

21





Access Road

Proposed Route

Surveyed Area

Unsurveyed Area

NHD Flowline

NHD Waterbody

Stations

") Expansion

") New

") Upgrade

Serv

ice

Laye

r Cre

dits

: © O

penS

treet

Map

(and

) con

tribu

tors

, CC

-BY-

SA, C

opyr

ight

:© 2

013

Nat

iona

l Geo

grap

hic

Soc

iety

, i-c

ubed


Page: 22 of 264

CO

PYR

IGH

T ©

201

9 B

UR

NS

& M

cDO

NN

ELL

MIC

HIG

AN, I

NC

.


Path

: \\b

mcd

\dfs

\Clie

nts\

TND

\DTE

Enr

\115

495_

TCA

RP

\Stu

dies

\Geo

spat

ial\D

ataF

iles\

Arc

Doc

s\W

DR

\TC

AR

P_W

DR

_Lin

coln

Trav

erse

_Top

o.m

xd

kdbo

atrig

ht

9/20

/201

9

NORTH

0 1,000500

Scale in Feet

")FrankfortCheck Meter

Station

Gran

d Tra

vers

e Co. 5

43

21





Access Road

Proposed Route

Surveyed Area

Unsurveyed Area

NHD Flowline

NHD Waterbody

Stations

") Expansion

") New

") Upgrade

Serv

ice

Laye

r Cre

dits

: © O

penS

treet

Map

(and

) con

tribu

tors

, CC

-BY-

SA, C

opyr

ight

:© 2

013

Nat

iona

l Geo

grap

hic

Soc

iety

, i-c

ubed

FrankfortJunction


Page: 23 of 264

CO

PYR

IGH

T ©

201

9 B

UR

NS

& M

cDO

NN

ELL

MIC

HIG

AN, I

NC

.


Path

: \\b

mcd

\dfs

\Clie

nts\

TND

\DTE

Enr

\115

495_

TCA

RP

\Stu

dies

\Geo

spat

ial\D

ataF

iles\

Arc

Doc

s\W

DR

\TC

AR

P_W

DR

_Lin

coln

Trav

erse

_Top

o.m

xd

kdbo

atrig

ht

9/20

/201

9

NORTH

0 1,000500

Scale in Feet

Gran

d Tra

vers

e Co. 5

43

21





Access Road

Proposed Route

Surveyed Area

Unsurveyed Area

NHD Flowline

NHD Waterbody

Stations

") Expansion

") New

") Upgrade

Serv

ice

Laye

r Cre

dits

: © O

penS

treet

Map

(and

) con

tribu

tors

, CC

-BY-

SA, C

opyr

ight

:© 2

013

Nat

iona

l Geo

grap

hic

Soc

iety

, i-c

ubed


Page: 24 of 264

CO

PYR

IGH

T ©

201

9 B

UR

NS

& M

cDO

NN

ELL

MIC

HIG

AN, I

NC

.


Path

: \\b

mcd

\dfs

\Clie

nts\

TND

\DTE

Enr

\115

495_

TCA

RP

\Stu

dies

\Geo

spat

ial\D

ataF

iles\

Arc

Doc

s\W

DR

\TC

AR

P_W

DR

_Lin

coln

Trav

erse

_Top

o.m

xd

kdbo

atrig

ht

9/20

/201

9

NORTH

0 1,000500

Scale in Feet

")

BoardmanLake

Mitchel Creek


Gran

d Tra

vers

e Co. 5

43

21





Access Road

Proposed Route

Surveyed Area

Unsurveyed Area

NHD Flowline

NHD Waterbody

Stations

") Expansion

") New

") Upgrade

Serv

ice

Laye

r Cre

dits

: © O

penS

treet

Map

(and

) con

tribu

tors

, CC

-BY-

SA, C

opyr

ight

:© 2

013

Nat

iona

l Geo

grap

hic

Soc

iety

, i-c

ubed



Page: 25 of 264

ATTACHMENT 3 – NWI & FEMA Map Phase I


Page: 26 of 264

CO

PYR

IGH

T ©

201

9 B

UR

NS

& M

cDO

NN

ELL

MIC

HIG

AN, I

NC

.

Source: Esri, DEQ, USGS-National Hydrography Dataset (NHD), FEMA (20190327), and Burns & McDonnell Michigan, Inc. Issued: 9/20/2019

Path

: \\b

mcd

\dfs

\Clie

nts\

TND

\DTE

Enr

\115

495_

TCA

RP

\Stu

dies

\Geo

spat

ial\D

ataF

iles\

Arc

Doc

s\W

DR

\TC

AR

P_W

DR

_Lin

coln

Trav

erse

_NW

I.mxd

kd

boat

right

9/

20/2

019

")

Perla Rd

Blair Townhall Rd

Pearla Rd

Freedom Rd

E Blair Town Hall Rd

Mayfield Trl

PEM1B

PEM1B

PFO1/4B

PFO1/4B

PFO1/4B

PFO1/4B

PFO1/SS1B

PFO1B

PFO1B

PFO1B

PFO4B

PSS1/EM1B

Blair toLincoln-TraverseInterconnect

Figure 3NWI & FEMA Map




Proposed Route

Surveyed Area

Unsurveyed Area

Access Road

Floodplain

Floodway

NWI-Mapped Wetland

Part 303 Final Wetland Inventory (FWI)MIRIS + NWI + Hydric Soils

MIRIS + NWI

Hydric Soils

Stations

") Expansion

") New

") Upgrade

Serv

ice

Laye

r Cre

dits

: © O

penS

treet

Map

(and

) con

tribu

tors

, CC

-BY-

SA, E

sri,

Dig

italG

lobe

, Geo

Eye,

Ear

thst

ar G

eogr

aphi

cs, C

NE

S/A

irbus

DS

, US

DA

, US

GS

, Aer

oGR

ID, I

GN

, and

the

GIS

Use

r Com

mun

ity

Gran

d Tra

vers

e Co. 5

43

21

NORTH

0 1,000500

Scale in Feet



Page: 27 of 264

CO

PYR

IGH

T ©

201

9 B

UR

NS

& M

cDO

NN

ELL

MIC

HIG

AN, I

NC

.


Path

: \\b

mcd

\dfs

\Clie

nts\

TND

\DTE

Enr

\115

495_

TCA

RP

\Stu

dies

\Geo

spat

ial\D

ataF

iles\

Arc

Doc

s\W

DR

\TC

AR

P_W

DR

_Lin

coln

Trav

erse

_NW

I.mxd

kd

boat

right

9/

20/2

019

W River Rd

Freedom Rd

Riv

er B

end

E Sleights Rd

W Sleights Rd

Lardie Rd

E River Rd

PEM1B

PEM1B

PEM1F

PFO1/4B

PFO1/4BPFO1/4B

PFO1/4B

PFO1/4B

PFO1/4B

PFO1/SS1BPFO1B

PFO1B

PFO1B

PFO4B

PFO4B

PFO4B

PSS1/EM1B

PSS1/EM1B

PSS1/EM1B

PSS1B

PSS1B

PSS1B

PSS1B

PSS1B

PSS1B

PSS1B PSS1B

R5UBH

R5UBH

R5UBH

R5UBH

R5UBHR5UBH

R5UBHR5UBH

R5UBH R5UBH

R5UBH

R5UBH

R5UBHR5UBH





Proposed Route

Surveyed Area

Unsurveyed Area

Access Road

Floodplain

Floodway

NWI-Mapped Wetland


MIRIS + NWI

Hydric Soils

Stations

") Expansion

") New

") Upgrade

Serv

ice

Laye

r Cre

dits

: © O

penS

treet

Map

(and

) con

tribu

tors

, CC

-BY-

SA, E

sri,

Dig

italG

lobe

, Geo

Eye,

Ear

thst

ar G

eogr

aphi

cs, C

NE

S/A

irbus

DS

, US

DA

, US

GS

, Aer

oGR

ID, I

GN

, and

the

GIS

Use

r Com

mun

ity

Gran

d Tra

vers

e Co. 5

43

21

NORTH

0 1,000500

Scale in Feet


Page: 28 of 264

CO

PYR

IGH

T ©

201

9 B

UR

NS

& M

cDO

NN

ELL

MIC

HIG

AN, I

NC

.


Path

: \\b

mcd

\dfs

\Clie

nts\

TND

\DTE

Enr

\115

495_

TCA

RP

\Stu

dies

\Geo

spat

ial\D

ataF

iles\

Arc

Doc

s\W

DR

\TC

AR

P_W

DR

_Lin

coln

Trav

erse

_NW

I.mxd

kd

boat

right

9/

20/2

019

")

FromholzRd

Lind Dr

Ced

arHill

Dr

S CreekR

d

Strohm Rd

Kratky Dr

W Sleights Rd

Rusch Rd S

Co Rd 611

Garfield Rd S

PEM1B

PEM1B PEM1B

PEM1B

PEM1C PEM1C

PEM1FxPFO1/4B

PFO1/4B

PFO1B

PFO4B

PFO4B

PSS1/EM1B

PSS1B

R5UBH R5UBH R5UBH

R5UBH

R5UBH

R5UBH

FrankfortCheck Meter

Station





Proposed Route

Surveyed Area

Unsurveyed Area

Access Road

Floodplain

Floodway

NWI-Mapped Wetland


MIRIS + NWI

Hydric Soils

Stations

") Expansion

") New

") Upgrade

Serv

ice

Laye

r Cre

dits

: © O

penS

treet

Map

(and

) con

tribu

tors

, CC

-BY-

SA, E

sri,

Dig

italG

lobe

, Geo

Eye,

Ear

thst

ar G

eogr

aphi

cs, C

NE

S/A

irbus

DS

, US

DA

, US

GS

, Aer

oGR

ID, I

GN

, and

the

GIS

Use

r Com

mun

ity

Gran

d Tra

vers

e Co. 5

43

21

NORTH

0 1,000500

Scale in Feet

FrankfortJunction


Page: 29 of 264

CO

PYR

IGH

T ©

201

9 B

UR

NS

& M

cDO

NN

ELL

MIC

HIG

AN, I

NC

.


Path

: \\b

mcd

\dfs

\Clie

nts\

TND

\DTE

Enr

\115

495_

TCA

RP

\Stu

dies

\Geo

spat

ial\D

ataF

iles\

Arc

Doc

s\W

DR

\TC

AR

P_W

DR

_Lin

coln

Trav

erse

_NW

I.mxd

kd

boat

right

9/

20/2

019

Lexingto n Dr

Windmil l Ln

Ma l ac h

iWay

Tradi tionsDr

Birmley Es ta

tes

Dr

Cobalt St

Woo

dedVa lley Dr

Rus

ch R

d S

Alhambra Dr

Douglas

DrG

arfieldRd

S

Farm

ingt

onD

r

Glastonbury

Cir

Ale

x and

er Dr

Solace Dr

Hoch Rd

Emerson Rd

Springhill Rd

W Potter RdPotter Rd W

Rusc

hRd

N

Garfield Rd N

Co Rd 611

PEM1C

PEM1C

PEM1C

PFO1/4B

PFO1B

PSS1B

PSS1BPUBF

PUBGh PUBGx

R5UBH

R5UBH

R5UBH





Proposed Route

Surveyed Area

Unsurveyed Area

Access Road

Floodplain

Floodway

NWI-Mapped Wetland


MIRIS + NWI

Hydric Soils

Stations

") Expansion

") New

") Upgrade

Serv

ice

Laye

r Cre

dits

: © O

penS

treet

Map

(and

) con

tribu

tors

, CC

-BY-

SA, E

sri,

Dig

italG

lobe

, Geo

Eye,

Ear

thst

ar G

eogr

aphi

cs, C

NE

S/A

irbus

DS

, US

DA

, US

GS

, Aer

oGR

ID, I

GN

, and

the

GIS

Use

r Com

mun

ity

Gran

d Tra

vers

e Co. 5

43

21

NORTH

0 1,000500

Scale in Feet


Page: 30 of 264

CO

PYR

IGH

T ©

201

9 B

UR

NS

& M

cDO

NN

ELL

MIC

HIG

AN, I

NC

.


Path

: \\b

mcd

\dfs

\Clie

nts\

TND

\DTE

Enr

\115

495_

TCA

RP

\Stu

dies

\Geo

spat

ial\D

ataF

iles\

Arc

Doc

s\W

DR

\TC

AR

P_W

DR

_Lin

coln

Trav

erse

_NW

I.mxd

kd

boat

right

9/

20/2

019

")

Pa rk Dr

Ced

ar S

t

Forrest St

S D

enni

s Pl

Industry Dr

Ric

hard

Pl

Cha

rles

Pl

S Th

omas

Pl

S M

icha

el P

l

Maple St

Dou

glasDr

Woodhill Ct

Rex Pl

Cor

ey P

l

Bayw

a y

C t

N Hammond Pl

Ale

xa

nder Dr

Kean

eD

r

Summerfie ld

Ln

Terra Rd

RidgeView Ct

WC

arria

g eH

illD

r

Key

ston

eH

ills

Ct

EC

arria

geH

illD

r

William Pl

Frank St

Beech Tre eL

n

Trav

erse

field

Dr

Ham

mo n

dPl

E

Manitou Dr

Knoll Crest CtK

eyst

one

Hill

sD

r

Maylane

Townhouse Ln

Oak Terrace Dr

TreelaneDr

Friendship

Dr

Terra

R d

Leisure Ln1750 Ahlberg Rd

Glen Dr

David Pl

Paul Pl

Geraldton Pl

Hemingway Ln

Harbor Hill Dr

Emerson Rd

Nor

ther

nSt

a rD

r

Andrew Pl

Tra d

eC

entr

eD

r

Ray B

lvd

Co

Rd

611

Hughes Dr

Solace Dr

la F

rani

er R

d

Co Rd 660Hammond Rd W

Keysto

ne R

d N

Gar

field

Rd

N

PABG

PEM1B

PEM1B

PEM1B

PEM1B

PEM1B

PEM1C

PFO1/4BPFO1/4B

PFO1/4BPFO1/4B

PFO1/4B

PFO1B

PFO1C

PFO4B

PFO4B

PFO4B

PSS1/EM1B

PSS1BPSS1C

PSS1C

PUBGh

PUBGh

PUBGx

PUBGx

PUBGx

PUBGx

PUBGx

PUBGx

R5UBH

R5UBH

R5UBH

R5UBH

R5UBH

R5UBH

R5UBH

R5UBH

R5UBH

R2UBHTraverse CityGate Station





Proposed Route

Surveyed Area

Unsurveyed Area

Access Road

Floodplain

Floodway

NWI-Mapped Wetland


MIRIS + NWI

Hydric Soils

Stations

") Expansion

") New

") Upgrade

Serv

ice

Laye

r Cre

dits

: © O

penS

treet

Map

(and

) con

tribu

tors

, CC

-BY-

SA, E

sri,

Dig

italG

lobe

, Geo

Eye,

Ear

thst

ar G

eogr

aphi

cs, C

NE

S/A

irbus

DS

, US

DA

, US

GS

, Aer

oGR

ID, I

GN

, and

the

GIS

Use

r Com

mun

ity

Gran

d Tra

vers

e Co. 5

43

21

NORTH

0 1,000500

Scale in Feet



Page: 31 of 264

ATTACHMENT 4 – SSURGO Soils Map Phase I


Page: 32 of 264

")

AsA Lu

RwA

RwA

CpA2

KbE

WdD

KaB

KaB

KaB

KaB

KbA

KaE

KbE

KbE

CpA

KaC3

KaC3

CpA

KaA2

KaB2

KbB

KbB2Tm

TmBlair toLincoln-TraverseInterconnect

Serv

ice

Laye

r Cre

dits

: © O

penS

treet

Map

(and

) con

tribu

tors

, CC

-BY-

SASo

urce

: Esr

i, D

igita

lGlo

be, G

eoEy

e, E

arth

star

Geo

grap

hics

, CN

ES

/Airb

us D

S, U

SD

A, U

SG

S, A

eroG

RID

, IG

N, a

nd th

e G

IS U

ser C

omm

unity

CO

PYR

IGH

T ©

201

9 B

UR

NS

& M

cDO

NN

ELL

MIC

HIG

AN, I

NC

.

Source: Esri, USDA/NRCS-SSURGO Soils Database (MI055), and Burns & McDonnell Michigan, Inc. Issued: 9/20/2019

Path

: \\b

mcd

\dfs

\Clie

nts\

TND

\DTE

Enr

\115

495_

TCA

RP

\Stu

dies

\Geo

spat

ial\D

ataF

iles\

Arc

Doc

s\W

DR

\TC

AR

P_W

DR

_Lin

coln

Trav

erse

_Soi

ls.m

xd

kdbo

atrig

ht

9/20

/201

9

NORTH

0 1,000500

Scale in Feet

Figure 4SSURGO Soils Map




Surveyed Area

Unsurveyed Area

Access Road

Proposed RouteSSURGO Soils Map Unit

Non-Hydric

Hydric

Stations

") Expansion

") New

") Upgrade

See attached table for map unit names.

Gran

d Tra

vers

e Co. 5

43

21



Page: 33 of 264

KaA

KaAKaA

KaA KaA

KaA

KaA

KaA

KaC

KaC

KaC

KaC

LkB

Rt

KaC

KaCKaC

RwA

KbC

LkE2LkE2

Lu

Lu

Lu

RcA

RcA

RwA

Ta

Ta

UnD

AsB

KaD

WdC

CpB

CpB

EyB

KaB

KaB

LkF2

Ru

Ru

Ru

RuRu

CpB2

EyD

RwF

RwF

RwF

IsA

KaE

LkF

UnE2

W

GrB

KaC3

KaC3

LkC

LuTa

TaTa Ta

WdD

WdD

CpA

EyF

GxE2

GxF2

KaA2

KaA2

EyF

EyF

KaB

KaB

KaB

KaB

KaF

KaBKaB

LkD

LkD

LkD LkD

LkD

LkD2

LkA

TmSe

rvic

e La

yer C

redi

ts: ©

Ope

nStre

etM

ap (a

nd) c

ontri

buto

rs, C

C-B

Y-SA

Sour

ce: E

sri,

Dig

italG

lobe

, Geo

Eye,

Ear

thst

ar G

eogr

aphi

cs, C

NE

S/A

irbus

DS

, US

DA

, US

GS

, Aer

oGR

ID, I

GN

, and

the

GIS

Use

r Com

mun

ity

CO

PYR

IGH

T ©

201

9 B

UR

NS

& M

cDO

NN

ELL

MIC

HIG

AN, I

NC

.


Path

: \\b

mcd

\dfs

\Clie

nts\

TND

\DTE

Enr

\115

495_

TCA

RP

\Stu

dies

\Geo

spat

ial\D

ataF

iles\

Arc

Doc

s\W

DR

\TC

AR

P_W

DR

_Lin

coln

Trav

erse

_Soi

ls.m

xd

kdbo

atrig

ht

9/20

/201

9

NORTH

0 1,000500

Scale in Feet





Surveyed Area

Unsurveyed Area

Access Road


Non-Hydric

Hydric

Stations

") Expansion

") New

") Upgrade


Gran

d Tra

vers

e Co. 5

43

21


Page: 34 of 264

")

KaA

KaA

KaC

KaC

LkB

LkB

LkB

LkB

LkB

LkB

MaB

MeBMeB

KaC

KaC

LkE2

LkE2

Lu

RcA

RcA

RcARcA

RcA

RcA

RcA RcA

RcARcA

RcA

RcARcA

RcA

UnD

UnD

UnD

EyC

AsB

ExA

EyC

EyC

EyC

EyCEyC

EyE2

IlB

IlB

IlC

KaD

Kt

EyB

EyB

WdC

WdC

WdC

CpB

EyB

EyB

EyB

GxAGxB2

KaA

KaAKaA

KaA

LkE

LkE

LkE

MeA

Ru

Ru

CoA

EyD

EyD

EyD EyD

KaC

MaC

EyE

EyE

EyE

EyE

EyE

LkF

LkF

LkF

LkF

UnE2

LkF

MaD2

MeC

UnD2

EyA

LkB2

GrC

GrC

KaC2

KaC3

LkC

LkC

LkC

LkC

LkC

LkC

LkC

Lu

Ta

Ta

Ta

ToUnB

WdD

WdD

WdD

CpA CpA

CpA

EyF

GxC2

GxD2

GxD2 GxD2

KaA2

KaA2

EyF2EyF2

KaB

KaB

KaB

KaD2

LkA

LkC2

KaB

KaB KaB

LkD

LkD

LkDLkD

LkD

LkD

LkD

LkD

LkD

LkD

LkD

LkD

LkD

LkD

LkD

LkD

LkD

LkD

LkD2

LkA

LkA

Tm

Tr

FrankfortCheck Meter

Station

Serv

ice

Laye

r Cre

dits

: © O

penS

treet

Map

(and

) con

tribu

tors

, CC

-BY-

SASo

urce

: Esr

i, D

igita

lGlo

be, G

eoEy

e, E

arth

star

Geo

grap

hics

, CN

ES

/Airb

us D

S, U

SD

A, U

SG

S, A

eroG

RID

, IG

N, a

nd th

e G

IS U

ser C

omm

unity

CO

PYR

IGH

T ©

201

9 B

UR

NS

& M

cDO

NN

ELL

MIC

HIG

AN, I

NC

.


Path

: \\b

mcd

\dfs

\Clie

nts\

TND

\DTE

Enr

\115

495_

TCA

RP

\Stu

dies

\Geo

spat

ial\D

ataF

iles\

Arc

Doc

s\W

DR

\TC

AR

P_W

DR

_Lin

coln

Trav

erse

_Soi

ls.m

xd

kdbo

atrig

ht

9/20

/201

9

NORTH

0 1,000500

Scale in Feet





Surveyed Area

Unsurveyed Area

Access Road


Non-Hydric

Hydric

Stations

") Expansion

") New

") Upgrade


Gran

d Tra

vers

e Co. 5

43

21

FrankfortJunction


Page: 35 of 264

EyD

EyD

EyD

LkB

LkB

LkB

LkB

LkB

LkB

LkB

LkBLkB

LkBLkB

LkB

LkB

LkB LkB

LkB

MaB

MaB

AeB

EyD2

EyD2

LkE2

LkE2

LkE2

LkE2

LkE2

LkF

LkF

RcA

RcA

RcA

RcARcA

RcARcA

RcA

RcA

RcA

RcA

RhA

RpA

RpAUnC UnC UnC

UnD

UnD

UnD

UnD

EyC

EyC

W

ExE

EyC

EyC

EyC

EyC

EyC

EyCEyC

EyC

LkC

LkC LkCLkC LkC

LkCLu Lu

EyB

EyB

WdC

WdC

WdC

WdC

WdC

WdCWdC

EyB

EyB

EyB

EyB

EyB

EyB

EyB

EyB

EyB

Gw

GxB

GxB2

Gy

Ho

Ho

LkE

LkE

LkE

LkE

LkELkE

LkE

LkE

LkELkE

LkE

LkE

LkELkE

LkE

LkE

LkF2

LkF2

LkF2

UnB

UnC

UnC

UnC

CoA

CoA

EyC2

EyDEyD

EyD

EyD

EyD

KaCKaC

MaA

MaB

MaB

MaC

RrA RrA

RrA

ExD

EyE

EyE

EyE

LkFLkF

LkF

LkFLkF

LkF

MaC2

MeC

RcA

RcA

RcA

RcA

RcA

UnD2

UnD2

UnE

UnE

UnE2

UnE2

UnF

UnF2

UnF2

EyA

EyA

EyALkB2

LkB2

LkB2

LkC

LkC

LkC

LkCLkC

LkCLkC

LkC

LkC

LkC

LkC

LkCLkC

LkD

LkD

WdD

WdD WdD

UnB

UnB

WdD

WdDWdD

WdD

WdD

WdD

ExC

EyF

EyF2

GxD2

GxE2

EyF

EyF2EyF2

KaB

KaB2

KaF

LkA

LkA

LkC2

LkC2

LkC2

LkDLkD

LkD

LkD

LkD

LkD

LkD

LkD

LkD

LkD

LkD2LkA

LkA

LkA

LkC2

Tp

Tp

Tr

Serv

ice

Laye

r Cre

dits

: © O

penS

treet

Map

(and

) con

tribu

tors

, CC

-BY-

SASo

urce

: Esr

i, D

igita

lGlo

be, G

eoEy

e, E

arth

star

Geo

grap

hics

, CN

ES

/Airb

us D

S, U

SD

A, U

SG

S, A

eroG

RID

, IG

N, a

nd th

e G

IS U

ser C

omm

unity

CO

PYR

IGH

T ©

201

9 B

UR

NS

& M

cDO

NN

ELL

MIC

HIG

AN, I

NC

.


Path

: \\b

mcd

\dfs

\Clie

nts\

TND

\DTE

Enr

\115

495_

TCA

RP

\Stu

dies

\Geo

spat

ial\D

ataF

iles\

Arc

Doc

s\W

DR

\TC

AR

P_W

DR

_Lin

coln

Trav

erse

_Soi

ls.m

xd

kdbo

atrig

ht

9/20

/201

9

NORTH

0 1,000500

Scale in Feet





Surveyed Area

Unsurveyed Area

Access Road


Non-Hydric

Hydric

Stations

") Expansion

") New

") Upgrade


Gran

d Tra

vers

e Co. 5

43

21


Page: 36 of 264

")

EyD

EyC2

CrA

LkB

LkB

LkBLkB

LkB LkB

LkB

LkBLkB

LkB AeB

KaC

KbC2

KlC

KlD

LkF

RpA

RpA

RwB

UnCUnC

UnC

UnC

UnC

UnC

UnD UnD

UnD

UnD

UnD UnD

W

AsA

AsA

AsA

AsA

AsA

AsA

AsA

AsA

AsBAsB

CpA

CpA

CpA

EyE

IoA

LkCLkC

LkCLkC

LkCLkC

LkC

LkC

LkC

LkC

LkC

LkC

LkC

LkC

LkC

Lu

Lu

Lu

CpB

CpB

RwB

Lu

Lu

RwD

WdCWdC

WdC

WdC

WdC

EyB

GxB2

EyB

EyB

Gt

Gt

Gt

GxA

GxB2

GxB2

KaA

Ru

Ru

Ru

Ru

Ru

Ru

Rv

UnB

UnB

UnB

UnB

KaC

KaC

MaB

RrA

RrA

RrA

Rs

IsA

KaE

KlF

KlF

KlF

RcA

RcA

RcA

RwA

RwARwA

UnF

W

EyC

EyC

KaB

KaB

KaB

KaB

KlA

LkB2

LkCLkC

LkCLkC

LkC

LkD

LkD

LkD

LkD

RcB

WdD

CpA

ExC

GxC2

GxD2

KaA

KaA

KaA

KaA

KaA

KaAKaA

LkA

LkA

LkA

LkD

Lu

KaF

KaF

LkA

LkC2

LkC2

RrC

Ru

Ru

Ru

Ru

Tm

Tm


Serv

ice

Laye

r Cre

dits

: © O

penS

treet

Map

(and

) con

tribu

tors

, CC

-BY-

SASo

urce

: Esr

i, D

igita

lGlo

be, G

eoEy

e, E

arth

star

Geo

grap

hics

, CN

ES

/Airb

us D

S, U

SD

A, U

SG

S, A

eroG

RID

, IG

N, a

nd th

e G

IS U

ser C

omm

unity

CO

PYR

IGH

T ©

201

9 B

UR

NS

& M

cDO

NN

ELL

MIC

HIG

AN, I

NC

.


Path

: \\b

mcd

\dfs

\Clie

nts\

TND

\DTE

Enr

\115

495_

TCA

RP

\Stu

dies

\Geo

spat

ial\D

ataF

iles\

Arc

Doc

s\W

DR

\TC

AR

P_W

DR

_Lin

coln

Trav

erse

_Soi

ls.m

xd

kdbo

atrig

ht

9/20

/201

9

NORTH

0 1,000500

Scale in Feet





Surveyed Area

Unsurveyed Area

Access Road


Non-Hydric

Hydric

Stations

") Expansion

") New

") Upgrade


Gran

d Tra

vers

e Co. 5

43

21



Page: 37 of 264

ATTACHMENT 5 – Wetland Delineation Map Phase I


Page: 38 of 264

Serv

ice

Laye

r Cre

dits

: © O

penS

treet

Map

(and

) con

tribu

tors

, CC

-BY-

SA

Sour

ce: E

sri,

Dig

italG

lobe

, Geo

Eye

, Ear

thst

ar G

eogr

aphi

cs, C

NES

/Airb

us D

S, U

SDA

, USG

S, A

eroG

RID

, IG

N, a

nd th

e G

IS U

ser C

omm

unity

CO

PYR

IGH

T ©

201

9 B

UR

NS

& M

cDO

NN

ELL

MIC

HIG

AN, I

NC

.

Source: Esri, DTE Imagery (2019), Census Streets (2018), and Burns & McDonnell Michigan, Inc. Issued: 9/20/2019

Path

: \\b

mcd

\dfs

\Clie

nts\

TND

\DTE

Enr\1

1549

5_TC

ARP

\Stu

dies

\Geo

spat

ial\D

ataF

iles\

ArcD

ocs\

WD

R\L

inco

lnTr

aver

se_D

elin

eatio

n_In

divI

nset

s\TC

AR

P_W

DR

_Lin

coln

Trav

erse

_Del

inea

tion_

1.m

xd

kdbo

atrig

ht

9/20

/201

9

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

")

!.!.


Beec

hCt

Jam

esC

tH

e min

gw

ay Ln

Birch Tree Ln

ND

enni

sLn

N T

hom

as P

l

N M

icha

el P

l

Bayway Ct

S D

enni

s Pl

S Th

omas

Pl

S M

icha

el P

l

Birch Tree Ln

David Pl

Andrew Pl

Geraldton Pl

Maylane

Ray Blvd

Paul Pl

William Pl

Terra Rd

Beech Tree Ln

Terra Rd

Glen Dr

la F

rani

er R

d

440+00

445+00

450+00

455+00

460+00

465+00

467+30

SP-1

SP-2W-1

12345

67

8910

11121314

15

Surveyed AreaUnsurveyed AreaROWProposed Route

!. Sample Plot (SP)Access Road

kj StationStream (S)

EphemeralIntermittentPerennial

Wetland (W)PFOPSSPEM

Stations") Expansion

") New

") Upgrade

!.

!.W-1

SP-1

SP-2

Figure 5Wetland Delineation Map




NORTH

0 300150

Scale in Feet



Page: 39 of 264

Serv

ice

Laye

r Cre

dits

: © O

penS

treet

Map

(and

) con

tribu

tors

, CC

-BY-

SAC

OP

YRIG

HT

© 2

019

BU

RN

S &

McD

ON

NE

LL M

ICH

IGAN

, IN

C.


Path

: \\b

mcd

\dfs

\Clie

nts\

TND

\DTE

Enr

\115

495_

TCA

RP

\Stu

dies

\Geo

spat

ial\D

ataF

iles\

Arc

Doc

s\W

DR

\TC

AR

P_W

DR

_Lin

coln

Trav

erse

_Del

inea

tion.

mxd

kd

boat

right

9/

20/2

019

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

!.

!.

!.

!.

Carriage Hill Dr

S Carriage Hill Dr

N Carriage Hill Dr

WC

arr ia

g eH

illDr

E C

arria

ge H

ill D

r

Co Rd 660Hammond Rd W

Gar

field

Rd

N415+00

420+00

425+00

430+00

435+00

SP-47

SP-48

SP-49

SP-50

S-9

W-17

12345

67

8910

11121314

15









Wetland (W)PFOPSSPEMPABPUB


") New

") Upgrade

NORTH

0 300150

Scale in Feet


Page: 40 of 264

Serv

ice

Laye

r Cre

dits

: © O

penS

treet

Map

(and

) con

tribu

tors

, CC

-BY-

SAC

OP

YRIG

HT

© 2

019

BU

RN

S &

McD

ON

NE

LL M

ICH

IGAN

, IN

C.


Path

: \\b

mcd

\dfs

\Clie

nts\

TND

\DTE

Enr

\115

495_

TCA

RP

\Stu

dies

\Geo

spat

ial\D

ataF

iles\

Arc

Doc

s\W

DR

\TC

AR

P_W

DR

_Lin

coln

Trav

erse

_Del

inea

tion.

mxd

kd

boat

right

9/

20/2

019

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

Industry Dr

Kean

eD

r

Emerson Rd

Hughes Dr

Co Rd 660 Hammond Rd W

Solace Dr

Nor

t her

nS t

arD

r

Co

Rd

611

Gar

field

Rd

N

375+00

380+00

385+00

390+00

395+00400+00

405+00

410+00

SP-18SP-19

SP-17

SP-20

SP-21

S-4

W-7

W-6

12345

67

8910

11121314

15











") New

") Upgrade

NORTH

0 300150

Scale in Feet


Page: 41 of 264

Serv

ice

Laye

r Cre

dits

: © O

penS

treet

Map

(and

) con

tribu

tors

, CC

-BY-

SAC

OP

YRIG

HT

© 2

019

BU

RN

S &

McD

ON

NE

LL M

ICH

IGAN

, IN

C.


Path

: \\b

mcd

\dfs

\Clie

nts\

TND

\DTE

Enr

\115

495_

TCA

RP

\Stu

dies

\Geo

spat

ial\D

ataF

iles\

Arc

Doc

s\W

DR

\TC

AR

P_W

DR

_Lin

coln

Trav

erse

_Del

inea

tion.

mxd

kd

boat

right

9/

20/2

019

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

!.

Springhill Rd

Rus

ch R

d N

Douglas Dr

Alexander Dr

Co Rd 611

Garfield Rd N335+00

340+00

345+00

350+00

355+00

360+00

365+00

370+00

SP-42

12345

67

8910

11121314

15











") New

") Upgrade

NORTH

0 300150

Scale in Feet


Page: 42 of 264

Serv

ice

Laye

r Cre

dits

: © O

penS

treet

Map

(and

) con

tribu

tors

, CC

-BY-

SA

Sour

ce: E

sri,

Dig

italG

lobe

, Geo

Eye

, Ear

thst

ar G

eogr

aphi

cs, C

NES

/Airb

us D

S, U

SDA

, USG

S, A

eroG

RID

, IG

N, a

nd th

e G

IS U

ser C

omm

unity

CO

PYR

IGH

T ©

201

9 B

UR

NS

& M

cDO

NN

ELL

MIC

HIG

AN, I

NC

.


Path

: \\b

mcd

\dfs

\Clie

nts\

TND

\DTE

Enr\1

1549

5_TC

ARP

\Stu

dies

\Geo

spat

ial\D

ataF

iles\

ArcD

ocs\

WD

R\L

inco

lnTr

aver

se_D

elin

eatio

n_In

divI

nset

s\TC

AR

P_W

DR

_Lin

coln

Trav

erse

_Del

inea

tion_

5.m

xd

kdbo

atrig

ht

9/20

/201

9

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

!.!.

CobaltSt

Umber Dr

Traditions Dr

Co Rd 611

Garfield Rd N

Rus

ch R

d N

305+00

310+00

315+00

320+00

325+00

330+00

SP-43SP-44

S-8

W-15

12345

67

8910

11121314

15







") New

") Upgrade

!.

!.

Rus

ch R

d N

W-15

SP-43

SP-44

S-8





NORTH

0 300150

Scale in Feet


Page: 43 of 264

Serv

ice

Laye

r Cre

dits

: © O

penS

treet

Map

(and

) con

tribu

tors

, CC

-BY-

SAC

OP

YRIG

HT

© 2

019

BU

RN

S &

McD

ON

NE

LL M

ICH

IGAN

, IN

C.


Path

: \\b

mcd

\dfs

\Clie

nts\

TND

\DTE

Enr

\115

495_

TCA

RP

\Stu

dies

\Geo

spat

ial\D

ataF

iles\

Arc

Doc

s\W

DR

\TC

AR

P_W

DR

_Lin

coln

Trav

erse

_Del

inea

tion.

mxd

kd

boat

right

9/

20/2

019

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

Co Rd 611

W Potter RdPotter Rd W

275+00

280+00

285+00

290+00

295+00

300+00

12345

67

8910

11121314

15











") New

") Upgrade

NORTH

0 300150

Scale in Feet


Page: 44 of 264

Serv

ice

Laye

r Cre

dits

: © O

penS

treet

Map

(and

) con

tribu

tors

, CC

-BY-

SAC

OP

YRIG

HT

© 2

019

BU

RN

S &

McD

ON

NE

LL M

ICH

IGAN

, IN

C.


Path

: \\b

mcd

\dfs

\Clie

nts\

TND

\DTE

Enr

\115

495_

TCA

RP

\Stu

dies

\Geo

spat

ial\D

ataF

iles\

Arc

Doc

s\W

DR

\TC

AR

P_W

DR

_Lin

coln

Trav

erse

_Del

inea

tion.

mxd

kd

boat

right

9/

20/2

019

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

")

Fromholz R

d

Lind Dr

Kratky Dr

Rusch Rd S

Frankfort CheckMeter Station

240+00

245+00

250+00

255+00

260+00

265+00

270+00

12345

67

8910

11121314

15











") New

") Upgrade

NORTH

0 300150

Scale in Feet

Frankfort Junction


Page: 45 of 264

Serv

ice

Laye

r Cre

dits

: © O

penS

treet

Map

(and

) con

tribu

tors

, CC

-BY-

SAC

OP

YRIG

HT

© 2

019

BU

RN

S &

McD

ON

NE

LL M

ICH

IGAN

, IN

C.


Path

: \\b

mcd

\dfs

\Clie

nts\

TND

\DTE

Enr

\115

495_

TCA

RP

\Stu

dies

\Geo

spat

ial\D

ataF

iles\

Arc

Doc

s\W

DR

\TC

AR

P_W

DR

_Lin

coln

Trav

erse

_Del

inea

tion.

mxd

kd

boat

right

9/

20/2

019

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

!.

Fromholz Rd

FromholzRd

210+00

215+00

220+00

225+00

230+00

235+00

SP-33

12345

67

8910

11121314

15











") New

") Upgrade

NORTH

0 300150

Scale in Feet


Page: 46 of 264

Serv

ice

Laye

r Cre

dits

: © O

penS

treet

Map

(and

) con

tribu

tors

, CC

-BY-

SAC

OP

YRIG

HT

© 2

019

BU

RN

S &

McD

ON

NE

LL M

ICH

IGAN

, IN

C.


Path

: \\b

mcd

\dfs

\Clie

nts\

TND

\DTE

Enr

\115

495_

TCA

RP

\Stu

dies

\Geo

spat

ial\D

ataF

iles\

Arc

Doc

s\W

DR

\TC

AR

P_W

DR

_Lin

coln

Trav

erse

_Del

inea

tion.

mxd

kd

boat

right

9/

20/2

019

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

!.

!.

!.

!.!.

!.

!.!.

Ceda

r Hill

Dr

180+00

185+00

190+00

195+00

200+00

205+00

SP-34

SP-35

SP-36

SP-37

SP-38

SP-53 SP-54

S-5

S-6

W-13

W-18

12345

67

8910

11121314

15











") New

") Upgrade

NORTH

0 300150

Scale in Feet


Page: 47 of 264

Serv

ice

Laye

r Cre

dits

: © O

penS

treet

Map

(and

) con

tribu

tors

, CC

-BY-

SAC

OP

YRIG

HT

© 2

019

BU

RN

S &

McD

ON

NE

LL M

ICH

IGAN

, IN

C.


Path

: \\b

mcd

\dfs

\Clie

nts\

TND

\DTE

Enr

\115

495_

TCA

RP

\Stu

dies

\Geo

spat

ial\D

ataF

iles\

Arc

Doc

s\W

DR

\TC

AR

P_W

DR

_Lin

coln

Trav

erse

_Del

inea

tion.

mxd

kd

boat

right

9/

20/2

019

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

!.!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

Cedar Hill Dr

W Sleights Rd

150+00

155+00

160+00

165+00

170+00

175+00

SP-22SP-23

SP-24

SP-25

SP-26

SP-39

SP-40

SP-41

SP-51

SP-52

S-7

W-8

W-14

W-9

12345

67

8910

11121314

15











") New

") Upgrade

NORTH

0 300150

Scale in Feet


Page: 48 of 264

Serv

ice

Laye

r Cre

dits

: © O

penS

treet

Map

(and

) con

tribu

tors

, CC

-BY-

SA

Sour

ce: E

sri,

Dig

italG

lobe

, Geo

Eye

, Ear

thst

ar G

eogr

aphi

cs, C

NES

/Airb

us D

S, U

SDA

, USG

S, A

eroG

RID

, IG

N, a

nd th

e G

IS U

ser C

omm

unity

CO

PYR

IGH

T ©

201

9 B

UR

NS

& M

cDO

NN

ELL

MIC

HIG

AN, I

NC

.


Path

: \\b

mcd

\dfs

\Clie

nts\

TND

\DTE

Enr\1

1549

5_TC

ARP

\Stu

dies

\Geo

spat

ial\D

ataF

iles\

ArcD

ocs\

WD

R\L

inco

lnTr

aver

se_D

elin

eatio

n_In

divI

nset

s\TC

AR

P_W

DR

_Lin

coln

Trav

erse

_Del

inea

tion_

11.m

xd

kdbo

atrig

ht

9/20

/201

9

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

!.!.

!.!.

!.!.

!.

!.

!.!.

Riv

er B

end

E River Rd

120+00

125+00

130+00

135+00

140+00

145+00

SP-12SP-13

SP-15

SP-16

SP-27 SP-28

SP-29

SP-30SP-31

SP-32

W-10

W-11

W-12

W-10

W-5

12345

67

8910

11121314

15

Surveyed AreaUnsurveyed AreaROW

!. Sample Plot (SP)Proposed RouteAccess Road





") New

") Upgrade

!.

!.

!.

W-11

W-12

SP-30

SP-31

SP-32






Page: 49 of 264

Serv

ice

Laye

r Cre

dits

: © O

penS

treet

Map

(and

) con

tribu

tors

, CC

-BY-

SA

Sour

ce: E

sri,

Dig

italG

lobe

, Geo

Eye

, Ear

thst

ar G

eogr

aphi

cs, C

NES

/Airb

us D

S, U

SDA

, USG

S, A

eroG

RID

, IG

N, a

nd th

e G

IS U

ser C

omm

unity

CO

PYR

IGH

T ©

201

9 B

UR

NS

& M

cDO

NN

ELL

MIC

HIG

AN, I

NC

.


Path

: \\b

mcd

\dfs

\Clie

nts\

TND

\DTE

Enr\1

1549

5_TC

ARP

\Stu

dies

\Geo

spat

ial\D

ataF

iles\

ArcD

ocs\

WD

R\L

inco

lnTr

aver

se_D

elin

eatio

n_In

divI

nset

s\TC

AR

P_W

DR

_Lin

coln

Trav

erse

_Del

inea

tion_

12.m

xd

kdbo

atrig

ht

9/20

/201

9

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

!.!.

!.!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.!.

Riv

er B

end

90+00

100+00

105+00

110+00

115+00

90+00

95+00

100+00

105+00

110+00

115+00

SP-7SP-8

SP-9SP-10

SP-14

SP-45

SP-46

SP-57

S-2

S-10

S-1

S-3Boardman River

W-2

W-3

W-4

W-5

W-5

W-16

S-3

W-20

12345

67

8910

11121314

15

Surveyed AreaUnsurveyed AreaROW

!. Sample Plot (SP)Proposed RouteAccess Road





") New

") Upgrade

!.

!.

W-3SP-7

SP-8

S-1

!.!.

W-4

SP-9SP-10

S-1

S-2

S-1





NORTH

0 300150

Scale in Feet


Page: 50 of 264

Serv

ice

Laye

r Cre

dits

: © O

penS

treet

Map

(and

) con

tribu

tors

, CC

-BY-

SA

Sour

ce: E

sri,

Dig

italG

lobe

, Geo

Eye

, Ear

thst

ar G

eogr

aphi

cs, C

NES

/Airb

us D

S, U

SDA

, USG

S, A

eroG

RID

, IG

N, a

nd th

e G

IS U

ser C

omm

unity

CO

PYR

IGH

T ©

201

9 B

UR

NS

& M

cDO

NN

ELL

MIC

HIG

AN, I

NC

.


Path

: \\b

mcd

\dfs

\Clie

nts\

TND

\DTE

Enr\1

1549

5_TC

ARP

\Stu

dies

\Geo

spat

ial\D

ataF

iles\

ArcD

ocs\

WD

R\L

inco

lnTr

aver

se_D

elin

eatio

n_In

divI

nset

s\TC

AR

P_W

DR

_Lin

coln

Trav

erse

_Del

inea

tion_

13.m

xd

kdbo

atrig

ht

9/20

/201

9

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.!.

!.!.

Freedom Rd

60+00

65+00

70+00

75+00

80+00

85+00

SP-4

SP-5

SP-6

SP-11

SP-55

SP-56

SP-58S-1

W-2

W-19

W-20

12345

67

8910

11121314

15







") New

") Upgrade

kj!.

!.

!.

!.!.

!.

!.

85+00

W-2

W-2

W-19

W-20

SP-5

SP-6

SP-11

SP-55

SP-56

SP-57SP-58

S-1





NORTH

0 300150

Scale in Feet


Page: 51 of 264

Serv

ice

Laye

r Cre

dits

: © O

penS

treet

Map

(and

) con

tribu

tors

, CC

-BY-

SAC

OP

YRIG

HT

© 2

019

BU

RN

S &

McD

ON

NE

LL M

ICH

IGAN

, IN

C.


Path

: \\b

mcd

\dfs

\Clie

nts\

TND

\DTE

Enr

\115

495_

TCA

RP

\Stu

dies

\Geo

spat

ial\D

ataF

iles\

Arc

Doc

s\W

DR

\TC

AR

P_W

DR

_Lin

coln

Trav

erse

_Del

inea

tion.

mxd

kd

boat

right

9/

20/2

019

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

Blair Townhall Rd

FreedomR

d

E Blair Town Hall Rd

30+00

35+00

40+00

45+00

50+00

55+00

12345

67

8910

11121314

15











") New

") Upgrade

NORTH

0 300150

Scale in Feet


Page: 52 of 264

Serv

ice

Laye

r Cre

dits

: © O

penS

treet

Map

(and

) con

tribu

tors

, CC

-BY-

SAC

OP

YRIG

HT

© 2

019

BU

RN

S &

McD

ON

NE

LL M

ICH

IGAN

, IN

C.


Path

: \\b

mcd

\dfs

\Clie

nts\

TND

\DTE

Enr

\115

495_

TCA

RP

\Stu

dies

\Geo

spat

ial\D

ataF

iles\

Arc

Doc

s\W

DR

\TC

AR

P_W

DR

_Lin

coln

Trav

erse

_Del

inea

tion.

mxd

kd

boat

right

9/

20/2

019

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

kj

")

!.Mayfield Trl

Blair toLincoln-Traverse

Interconnect

1+00

5+00

10+00

15+00

20+00

25+00

SP-3

12345

67

8910

11121314

15











") New

") Upgrade

NORTH

0 300150

Scale in Feet



Page: 53 of 264

APPENDIX B –WETLAND DETERMINATION DATAFORMS


Page: 54 of 264

US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Northcentral and Northeast Region

Project/Site: Lincoln to Traverse City Pipeline City/County: Grand Traverse Sampling Date: 5/28/2019

Applicant/Owner: DTE Energy State: MI Sampling Point: SP-1

Investigator(s): S. Gutman, H. Preston Section, Township, Range: S23 27N 11W

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.) depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0

Subregion (LRR or MLRA): L Lat: 44.72745 Long: -85.604684 Datum: NAD83

Soil Map Unit Name: Rubicon sand, 0-6 % slopes NWI Classification: N/A

Are climate/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks)

Vegetation Soil HydrologySignificantly Disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No

Naturally Problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.Yes No

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?Hydric Soil Present?Wetland Hydrology Present?

Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?

Remarks: Sample plot is located in PSS W-1. Photo: 1.

HYDROLOGY

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply)

Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) Sediment Deposits (B2) Drift Deposits (B3) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Iron Deposits (B5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)

Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Marl Deposits (B15) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Other (Explain in Remarks)

Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Drainage Patterns (B10) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Microtopographic Relief (D4) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)

Field Observations: Yes NoDepth

(inches):Surface Water Present? Water Table Present?

Saturation Present?(includes capillary fringe)

Wetland Hydrology Present?

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections, etc.), if available:

Remarks: Wetland hydrology indicators D2 and D5 are present.


Page: 55 of 264


VEGETATION – Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point: SP-1

Dominance Test worksheet:

Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)

Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B)

Prevalence Index worksheet:

Total % Cover of: Multiply by:

OBL species % x 1 = 0

FACW species % x 2 = 0

FAC species % x 3 = 0

FACU species % x 4 = 0

UPL species % x 5 = 0

Column Totals: 0 % (A) 0 (B)

Prevalence Index = B/A =

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:

1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation

2 - Dominance Test is >50%

3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01

4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)

Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)

1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic

Definitions of Vegetation Strata:

Tree – Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.

Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30')Absolute % Cover

Dominant Species?

Indicator Status

1. Populus heterophylla 20 % Y FACW2. % 3. % 4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

20 % = Total Cover

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15')

1. Salix nigra 60 % Y OBL2. Salix discolor 20 % Y FACW3. % 4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

80 % = Total Cover

Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5')

1. Symphyotrichum lanceolatum 10 % Y FACW2. Rubus ideaus 5 % Y FAC3. Alnus incana 2 % N FACW4. % 5. % 6. % 7. % 8. % 9. %

10. % 11. % 12. %

17 % = Total Cover

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30')

1. % 2. % 3. % 4. %

0 % = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No

Remarks (include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet): Hydrophytic vegetation is present.


Page: 56 of 264


SOIL Sampling Point: SP-1

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)

Matrix Redox FeaturesDepth(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks

0-1 10YR 3/2 100 sand 1-3 10YR 3/2 90 7.5YR 5/6 10 C M sand

3-24 10YR 3/2 70 7.5YR 5/6 15 C M sand 10YR 2/1 15 D M

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:

Histosol (A1)

Histic Epipedon (A2)

Black Histic (A3)

Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)

Stratified Layers (A5)

Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)

Thick Dark Surface (A12)

Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)

Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)

Sandy Redox (S5)

Stripped Matrix (S6)

Dark Surface (S7) (LRR R, MLRA 149B)

Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)

Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R, MLRA 149B)

Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR K, L)

Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)

Depleted Matrix (F3)

Redox Dark Surface (F6)

Depleted Dark Surface (F7)

Redox Depressions (F8)

2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B)

Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R)

5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R)

Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L)

Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR, K, L)

Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR, K, L)

Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR, K, L)

Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149B)

Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B)

Red Parent Material (F21)

Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)

Other (Explain in Remarks)3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic

Restrictive Layer (if observed): Hydric Soil Present? Type: Depth (inches): Yes No

Remarks: Hydric soil indicator S5 is present.


Page: 57 of 264






Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.) slight hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 2


Soil Map Unit Name: Rubicon sand, 0-6 % slopes NWI Classification: N/A







Remarks: Sample plot is located in upland. Photo: 2.

HYDROLOGY











Remarks: Wetland hydrology indicators are not present.


Page: 58 of 264





























Dominant Species?

Indicator Status

1. Quercus velutina 45 % Y UPL2. Populus alba 5 % N UPL3. % 4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

50 % = Total Cover


1. Quercus velutina 20 % Y UPL2. Acer rubrum 5 % N FAC3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 5 % N FACW4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

30 % = Total Cover


1. Pteridium aquilinum 15 % Y FACU2. Quercus velutina 15 % Y UPL3. Fragaria vesca 5 % N UPL4. Rhus typhina 5 % N UPL5. Poa pratensis 2 % N FACU6. % 7. % 8. % 9. %

10. % 11. % 12. %

42 % = Total Cover


1. % 2. % 3. % 4. %


Remarks (include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet): Hydrophytic vegetation is not present.


Page: 59 of 264





0-16 10YR 3/3 100 sand 16-24 7.5YR 5/6 98 10YR 3/3 2 C M sand



Histosol (A1)


Black Histic (A3)







Sandy Redox (S5)
























Remarks: Hydric soil is not present.


Page: 60 of 264






Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.) flat Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0


Soil Map Unit Name: Kalkaska sand, 0-2 % slopes NWI Classification: N/A








HYDROLOGY











Remarks: Wetland hydrology indicators are not present.


Page: 61 of 264





























Dominant Species?

Indicator Status

1. Pinus strobus 45 % Y FACU2. Populus tremuloides 30 % Y FAC3. Alnus glutinosa 20 % Y FACW4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

95 % = Total Cover


1. Populus tremuloides 25 % Y FAC2. Quercus rubra 10 % Y FACU3. Prunus virginiana 5 % N FACU4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

40 % = Total Cover


1. Pteridium aquilinum 15 % Y FACU2. Quercus rubra 5 % Y FACU3. Acer rubrum 2 % N FAC4. % 5. % 6. % 7. % 8. % 9. %

10. % 11. % 12. %

22 % = Total Cover


1. % 2. % 3. % 4. %




Page: 62 of 264





0-3 10YR 2/2 100 sand 3-16 10YR 3/3 100 sand

16-20 10YR 4/2 80 7.5YR 5/6 20 C M sand 20-24 10YR 4/2 70 7.5YR 5/6 30 C M sand



Histosol (A1)


Black Histic (A3)







Sandy Redox (S5)
























Remarks: Hydric soil is not present.


Page: 63 of 264






Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.) slight depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1


Soil Map Unit Name: Kalkaska loamy sand, 0-2 % slopes, moderately eroded NWI Classification: N/A








HYDROLOGY











Remarks: Wetland hydrology indicator D2 is present.


Page: 64 of 264





























Dominant Species?

Indicator Status

1. % 2. % 3. % 4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

0 % = Total Cover


1. Elaeagnus umbellata 45 % Y UPL2. % 3. % 4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

45 % = Total Cover


1. Cynodon dactylon 45 % Y FACU2. Euphorbia esula 10 % N UPL3. % 4. % 5. % 6. % 7. % 8. % 9. %

10. % 11. % 12. %

55 % = Total Cover


1. % 2. % 3. % 4. %




Page: 65 of 264





0-3 10YR 3/3 100 sandy loam rocks present



Histosol (A1)


Black Histic (A3)







Sandy Redox (S5)























Restrictive Layer (if observed): Hydric Soil Present? Type: rock Depth (inches): 3 Yes No

Remarks: Hydric soil is not present. Tried to dig in additional areas, still met the restiricitve layer.


Page: 66 of 264






Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.) slight depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1


Soil Map Unit Name: Kalkaska loamy sand, 18-25 % slopes NWI Classification: N/A







Remarks: Sample plot is located in PEM W-2, which is part of a wetland complex. Photo: 5.

HYDROLOGY







(inches):Surface Water Present? Water Table Present? 1

surfaceSaturation Present?(includes capillary fringe)



Remarks: Wetland hydrology indicators A2, A3, B9, D2, and D5 are present.


Page: 67 of 264





























Dominant Species?

Indicator Status

1. % 2. % 3. % 4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

0 % = Total Cover


1. % 2. % 3. % 4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

0 % = Total Cover


1. Equisetum arvense 40 % Y FAC2. Phalaris arundinacea 30 % Y FACW3. Eleocharis palustris 10 % N OBL4. Onolcea sensibilis 10 % N FACW5. Symphyotrichum lanceolatum 2 % N FACW6. % 7. % 8. % 9. %

10. % 11. % 12. %

92 % = Total Cover


1. % 2. % 3. % 4. %




Page: 68 of 264





0-2 2.5Y 2.5/1 100 mucky sand 20% OM2-24 2.5Y 2.5/1 98 10YR 5/2 2 D M mucky peat 20% OM



Histosol (A1)


Black Histic (A3)







Sandy Redox (S5)
























Remarks: Hydric soil indicators A1 and S1 are present.


Page: 69 of 264






Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.) hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 2









Remarks: Sample plot is located in PFO portion of W-2. Photo: 6.

HYDROLOGY








surface Saturation Present?(includes capillary fringe)



Remarks: Wetland hydrology indicators A2, A3, B9, D2, and D5 are present.


Page: 70 of 264





























Dominant Species?

Indicator Status

1. Thuja occidentalis 65 % Y FACW2. Tsuga canadensis 50 % Y FACU3. Acer sacchariunum 20 % N FACW4. Betula alleghaniensis 5 % N FAC5. % 6. % 7. %

140 % = Total Cover


1. % 2. % 3. % 4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

0 % = Total Cover


1. Malaxis unifolia 20 % Y FAC2. Glyceria striata 10 % Y OBL3. Arisaema triphyllum 5 % N FAC4. Fraxinus nigra 5 % N FACW5. % 6. % 7. % 8. % 9. %

10. % 11. % 12. %

40 % = Total Cover


1. % 2. % 3. % 4. %




Page: 71 of 264





0-1 2.5Y 2.5/1 100 mucky peat 30% OM1-30 2.5 2.5/1 100 peat 30% OM



Histosol (A1)


Black Histic (A3)







Sandy Redox (S5)
























Remarks: Hydric soil indicator A1 is present.


Page: 72 of 264






Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.) streambank Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1









Remarks: Sample plot is located in PFO W-3. Photo: 7.

HYDROLOGY











Remarks: Wetland hydrology indicators B9, C1, C3, D2, and D5 are present.


Page: 73 of 264





























Dominant Species?

Indicator Status

1. Fraxinus nigra 30 % Y FACW2. Betula alleghaniensis 10 % Y FAC3. Alnus incana 5 % N FACW4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

45 % = Total Cover


1. % 2. % 3. % 4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

0 % = Total Cover


1. Erythronium americanum 20 % Y UPL2. Cornus racemosa 15 % Y FAC3. Prunus virginiana 10 % Y FACU4. % 5. % 6. % 7. % 8. % 9. %

10. % 11. % 12. %

45 % = Total Cover


1. % 2. % 3. % 4. %




Page: 74 of 264





0-3 10YR 3/2 90 7.5YR 4/3 10 C PL mucky clay 3-20 10YR 3/2 80 5YR 3/4 20 C M clay sand



Histosol (A1)


Black Histic (A3)







Sandy Redox (S5)
























Remarks: Hydric soil indicators A4 and S5 are present.


Page: 75 of 264
















HYDROLOGY











Remarks: Wetland hydrology is not present.


Page: 76 of 264





























Dominant Species?

Indicator Status

1. Fagus grandifolia 45 % Y FACU2. Tsuga canadensis 45 % Y FACU3. Acer rubrum 10 % N FAC4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

100 % = Total Cover


1. Fagus grandifolia 20 % Y FACU2. % 3. % 4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

20 % = Total Cover


1. Erythronium americanum 10 % Y UPL2. Arisaema triphyllum 2 % N FAC3. % 4. % 5. % 6. % 7. % 8. % 9. %

10. % 11. % 12. %

12 % = Total Cover


1. % 2. % 3. % 4. %




Page: 77 of 264





0-6 10YR 3/2 100 sandy loam



Histosol (A1)


Black Histic (A3)







Sandy Redox (S5)
























Remarks: Hydric soil indicators are not present. Tried additional areas for soil pits, restrictive layer was stil met.


Page: 78 of 264






Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.) streambank Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1









Remarks: Sample plot is located in PEM W-4. Photo: 9.

HYDROLOGY











Remarks: Wetland hydrology indicators B9, C1, C3, D2, and D5 are present.


Page: 79 of 264





























Dominant Species?

Indicator Status

1. Tsuga canadensis 5 % Y FACU2. % 3. % 4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

5 % = Total Cover


1. Fraxinus nigra 10 % Y FACW2. % 3. % 4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

10 % = Total Cover


1. Ribes americanum 25 % Y FACW2. Fraxinus nigra 20 % Y FACW3. Arisaema triphyllum 15 % Y FAC4. Carex vulpinoidea 10 % N OBL5. Impatiens capensis 2 % N FACW6. % 7. % 8. % 9. %

10. % 11. % 12. %

72 % = Total Cover


1. % 2. % 3. % 4. %




Page: 80 of 264





0-8 10YR 3/2 90 7.5YR 3/4 10 C PL sandy clay loam 8-20 10YR 3/2 80 10YR 5/2 20 D M sandy clay

20-30 10YR 3/2 100 sandy muck



Histosol (A1)


Black Histic (A3)







Sandy Redox (S5)
























Remarks: Hydric soil indicators A10, F6, and F7 are present.


Page: 81 of 264
















HYDROLOGY













Page: 82 of 264





























Dominant Species?

Indicator Status

1. Tsuga canadensis 75 % Y FACU2. Acer rubrum 15 % N FAC3. % 4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

90 % = Total Cover


1. % 2. % 3. % 4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

0 % = Total Cover


1. Pteridium aquilinum 5 % Y FACU2. Erythronium americanum 2 % N UPL3. % 4. % 5. % 6. % 7. % 8. % 9. %

10. % 11. % 12. %

7 % = Total Cover


1. % 2. % 3. % 4. %




Page: 83 of 264





0-2 10YR 3/2 100 sand 2-10 10YR 4/3 95 7.5YR 5/6 5 C M sand



Histosol (A1)


Black Histic (A3)







Sandy Redox (S5)
























Remarks: Hydric soil indicators are not present. Tried additional areas for soil pits, restrictive layer still met.


Page: 84 of 264
















HYDROLOGY













Page: 85 of 264





























Dominant Species?

Indicator Status

1. Tsuga canadensis 30 % Y FACU2. Acer rubrum 30 % Y FAC3. Betula papyrifera 10 % N FACU4. Thuja occidentalis 5 % N FACW5. % 6. % 7. %

75 % = Total Cover


1. Hamamelis virginiana 15 % Y FACU2. Tsuga canadensis 10 % Y FACU3. % 4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

25 % = Total Cover


1. Pteridium aquilinum 20 % Y FACU2. Maxalis unifolia 20 % Y FAC3. Carex davisii 10 % N FAC4. Fraxinus nigra 5 % N FACW5. Trientalis borealis 2 % N FAC6. % 7. % 8. % 9. %

10. % 11. % 12. %

57 % = Total Cover


1. % 2. % 3. % 4. %




Page: 86 of 264





0-12 2.5Y 2.5/1 100 sandy clay loam



Histosol (A1)


Black Histic (A3)







Sandy Redox (S5)























Restrictive Layer (if observed): Hydric Soil Present? Type: roots Depth (inches): 12 Yes No

Remarks: Hydric soil indicators are not present. Tried additional areas for soil pits, restrictive layer still met.


Page: 87 of 264








Soil Map Unit Name: Roscommon mucky loamy sand NWI Classification: PSS1/EM1B








HYDROLOGY







(inches):Surface Water Present? 2Water Table Present? surface




Remarks: Wetland hydrology indicators A1, A2, A3, C3, D2, and D5 are present.


Page: 88 of 264





























Dominant Species?

Indicator Status

1. % 2. % 3. % 4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

0 % = Total Cover


1. Salix amygdaloides 5 % Y FACW2. Salix nigra 2 % N OBL3. % 4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

7 % = Total Cover


1. Phalaris arundinacea 100 % Y FACW2. Carex vulpinoidea 20 % Y OBL3. Cornus racemosa 2 % N FACW4. % 5. % 6. % 7. % 8. % 9. %

10. % 11. % 12. %

122 % = Total Cover


1. % 2. % 3. % 4. %




Page: 89 of 264





0-8 2.5Y 2.5/1 90 7.5YR 4/4 10 C PL sandy clay 8-24 10YR 5/1 85 7.5YR 5/8 25 C M sandy clay



Histosol (A1)


Black Histic (A3)







Sandy Redox (S5)
























Remarks: Hydric soil indicator F3 is present.


Page: 90 of 264















Remarks: Sample plot is located in PFO W-5, which is part of a wetland complex. Photo: 13.

HYDROLOGY








2Saturation Present?(includes capillary fringe)



Remarks: Wetland hydrology indicators A2, A3, B9, C1, C3, D2, and D5 are present.


Page: 91 of 264





























Dominant Species?

Indicator Status

1. Populus tremuloides 65 % Y FAC2. Salix amygdaloides 25 % Y FACW3. % 4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

90 % = Total Cover


1. Populus tremuloides 20 % Y FAC2. Cornus obliqua 20 % Y FACW3. Salix amygdaloides 15 % N FACW4. Viburnum acerifolium 15 % N UPL5. Fraxinus nigra 10 % N FACW6. % 7. %

80 % = Total Cover


1. Phalaris arundinacea 60 % Y FACW2. Equisetum arvense 30 % Y FAC3. Symphyotrichum novae-angliae 20 % N FACW4. Carex vulpinoidea 5 % N OBL5. Viburnum acerifolium 2 % N UPL6. Ribes americanum 2 % N FACW7. % 8. % 9. %

10. % 11. % 12. %

119 % = Total Cover


1. % 2. % 3. % 4. %




Page: 92 of 264





0-3 2.5Y 2.5/1 100 muck 30% OM3-16 2.5Y 2.5/1 100 mucky clay 10% OM

16-24 10YR 5/1 85 7.5YR 5/6 25 C M clay



Histosol (A1)


Black Histic (A3)







Sandy Redox (S5)
























Remarks: Hydric soil indicators A4 is present.


Page: 93 of 264








Soil Map Unit Name: Croswell loamy sands, 0-2 % slopes NWI Classification: PSS1B








HYDROLOGY













Page: 94 of 264





























Dominant Species?

Indicator Status

1. % 2. % 3. % 4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

0 % = Total Cover


1. % 2. % 3. % 4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

0 % = Total Cover


1. Trifolium repens 60 % Y FACU2. Poa pratensis 30 % Y FACU3. Taraxacum officinale 25 % N FACU4. Fragaria vesca 10 % N UPL5. Plantago lanceolata 2 % N FACU6. % 7. % 8. % 9. %

10. % 11. % 12. %

127 % = Total Cover


1. % 2. % 3. % 4. %




Page: 95 of 264





0-20 10YR 3/3 100 silty clay loam 20-24 10YR 3/2 60 10YR 6/2 30 D M silty clay 7.5YR 5/6 10 C M



Histosol (A1)


Black Histic (A3)







Sandy Redox (S5)
























Remarks: Hydric soil indicators are not present.


Page: 96 of 264
















HYDROLOGY







(inches):Surface Water Present? 0.5Water Table Present? surface

surface Saturation Present?(includes capillary fringe)





Page: 97 of 264





























Dominant Species?

Indicator Status

1. Populus heterophylla 70 % Y OBL2. % 3. % 4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

70 % = Total Cover


1. Cornus obliqua 20 % Y FACW2. Alnus incana 5 % Y FACW3. % 4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

25 % = Total Cover


1. Phalaris arundinacea 60 % Y FACW2. Spartina pectinata 50 % Y FACW3. Caltha palustris 15 % N OBL4. Equisetum arevense 5 % N FAC5. % 6. % 7. % 8. % 9. %

10. % 11. % 12. %

130 % = Total Cover


1. % 2. % 3. % 4. %




Page: 98 of 264








Histosol (A1)


Black Histic (A3)







Sandy Redox (S5)
























Remarks: Hydric soil indicators A1 and A4 are present.


Page: 99 of 264
















HYDROLOGY











Remarks: Wetland hydrology indicators A1, A2, A3, D2, and D5 are present.


Page: 100 of 264





























Dominant Species?

Indicator Status

1. % 2. % 3. % 4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

0 % = Total Cover


1. % 2. % 3. % 4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

0 % = Total Cover


1. Phalaris arundinacea 90 % Y FACW2. Spartina pectinata 30 % Y FACW3. Typha latifolia 10 % N OBL 4. % 5. % 6. % 7. % 8. % 9. %

10. % 11. % 12. %

130 % = Total Cover


1. % 2. % 3. % 4. %




Page: 101 of 264





0-6 2.5Y 2.5/1 100 muck 20% OM6-24 2.5Y 2.5/1 100 mucky peat 30% OM



Histosol (A1)


Black Histic (A3)







Sandy Redox (S5)


























Page: 102 of 264








Soil Map Unit Name: Carlisle muck, 0-2% slopes, cool NWI Classification: PEMB







Remarks: Sample plot is located in PSS W-6, which is part of a wetland complex. Photo: 17.

HYDROLOGY













Page: 103 of 264





























Dominant Species?

Indicator Status

1. % 2. % 3. % 4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

0 % = Total Cover


1. Salix amygdaloides 60 % Y FACW2. Salix nigra 20 % Y OBL3. % 4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

80 % = Total Cover


1. Typha angustifolia 35 % Y OBL2. Lemna spp* 5 % N OBL3. % 4. % 5. % 6. % 7. % 8. % 9. %

10. % 11. % 12. %

40 % = Total Cover


1. % 2. % 3. % 4. %


Remarks (include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet): Hydrophytic vegetation is present.*The Lemna could not be identified to species. The indicator status was considered OBL because all subspecies of Lemna in this region have an indicator status of OBL


Page: 104 of 264





0-2 2.5Y 2.5/1 100 muck 10% OM2-5 2.5Y 2.5/1 100 mucky peat

5-24 2.5Y 2.5/1 90 10YR 6/2 10 C M sandy muck



Histosol (A1)


Black Histic (A3)







Sandy Redox (S5)


























Page: 105 of 264
















HYDROLOGY











Remarks: Wetland hydrology indicators A2, A3, C1, D2, and D5 are present.


Page: 106 of 264





























Dominant Species?

Indicator Status

1. % 2. % 3. % 4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

0 % = Total Cover


1. % 2. % 3. % 4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

0 % = Total Cover


1. Typha latifolia 60 % Y OBL2. Equisetum arvense 30 % Y FAC3. Eleocharis compressa 20 % N FACW4. Salix amygdaloides 10 % N FACW5. % 6. % 7. % 8. % 9. %

10. % 11. % 12. %

120 % = Total Cover


1. % 2. % 3. % 4. %




Page: 107 of 264





0-24 2.5Y 2.5/1 muck 15% OM



Histosol (A1)


Black Histic (A3)







Sandy Redox (S5)


























Page: 108 of 264
















HYDROLOGY











Remarks: Wetland hydrology indicators A2, A3, C7, D2, and D5 are present.


Page: 109 of 264





























Dominant Species?

Indicator Status

1. Thuja occidentalis 40 % Y FACW2. Betula alleghaniensis 30 % Y FAC3. Acer saccharum 10 % N FACU4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

80 % = Total Cover


1. Thuja occidentalis 10 % Y FACW2. % 3. % 4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

10 % = Total Cover


1. Onoclea sensibilis 30 % Y FACW2. Pycnanthemum muticum 30 % Y FAC3. Equisetum arvense 20 % Y FAC4. Phalaris arundinacea 10 % N FACW5. % 6. % 7. % 8. % 9. %

10. % 11. % 12. %

90 % = Total Cover


1. % 2. % 3. % 4. %




Page: 110 of 264





0-1 2.5Y 2.5/1 muck 1-5 2.5Y 2.5/1 100 mucky peat 12% OM

5-16 2.5Y 2.5/1 90 10YR 6/1 10 C M sandy muck 16-24 10YR 5/2 90 7.5YR 5/6 10 C M sand



Histosol (A1)


Black Histic (A3)







Sandy Redox (S5)
























Remarks: Hydric soil indicators A1 and F6 are present.


Page: 111 of 264








Soil Map Unit Name: Carlisle muck, 0-2% slopes, cool NWI Classification: PFO4B








HYDROLOGY













Page: 112 of 264





























Dominant Species?

Indicator Status

1. Tsuga canadensis 80 % Y FACU2. Ulmus americana 20 % N FACW3. Acer saccharum 5 % N FACU4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

105 % = Total Cover


1. Hamamelis virginiana 10 % Y FACU2. Acer saccharum 5 % Y FACU3. % 4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

15 % = Total Cover


1. Pteridium aquilinum 25 % Y UPL2. Erythronium americanum 20 % Y UPL3. Fraxinus nigra 5 % N FACW4. % 5. % 6. % 7. % 8. % 9. %

10. % 11. % 12. %

50 % = Total Cover


1. % 2. % 3. % 4. %




Page: 113 of 264





0-6 2.5Y 2.5/1 100 sandy loam



Histosol (A1)


Black Histic (A3)







Sandy Redox (S5)
























Remarks: Hydric soil indicators are not present. Tried additional areas for soil pits, restrictive layer was still met.


Page: 114 of 264








Soil Map Unit Name: Emmet sandy loam, 18-25% slopes NWI Classification: PFO4B








HYDROLOGY











Remarks: Wetland hydrology indicators A2, A3, C1, D2, and D5 present.


Page: 115 of 264





























Dominant Species?

Indicator Status

1. Betula alleghaniensis 50 % Y FAC2. Thuja occidentalis 40 % Y FACW3. % 4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

90 % = Total Cover


1. Thuja occidentalis 25 % Y FACW2. % 3. % 4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

25 % = Total Cover


1. Carex stricta 60 % Y FAC2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 15 % N FACW3. Fraxinus nigra 15 % N FACW4. Arisaema triphyllum 5 % N FACW5. Parthenocissus quinquefolia 5 % N FACU6. % 7. % 8. % 9. %

10. % 11. % 12. %

100 % = Total Cover


1. % 2. % 3. % 4. %




Page: 116 of 264





0-6 2.5Y 2.5/1 100 muck 20% OM6-24 2.5Y 2.5/1 100 mucky peat 15% OM



Histosol (A1)


Black Histic (A3)







Sandy Redox (S5)


























Page: 117 of 264








Soil Map Unit Name: Tawas-Roscommon complex NWI Classification: PFO4/1B








HYDROLOGY








3Saturation Present?(includes capillary fringe)



Remarks: Wetland hydrology indicators A2, A3, B9, D2, and D5 present.


Page: 118 of 264





























Dominant Species?

Indicator Status

1. Populus tremuloides 50 % Y FACU2. Populus heterophylla 30 % Y OBL3. Ulmus rubra 30 % Y FAC4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

110 % = Total Cover


1. Betula alleghaniensis 20 % Y FAC2. Fraxinus nigra 15 % Y FACW3. Cornus racemosa 5 % N FAC4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

40 % = Total Cover


1. Onoclea sensibilis 65 % Y FACW2. Ribes americanum 30 % Y FACW3. Glyceria striata 10 % N OBL4. Equisetum arvense 5 % N FAC5. Cornus racemosa 5 % N FAC6. % 7. % 8. % 9. %

10. % 11. % 12. %

115 % = Total Cover


1. % 2. % 3. % 4. %




Page: 119 of 264






6-24 10YR 5/2 90 7.5YR 4/4 10 C M sandy muck



Histosol (A1)


Black Histic (A3)







Sandy Redox (S5)


























Page: 120 of 264








Soil Map Unit Name: Tawas-Roscommon complex NWI Classification: PFO4/1B







Remarks: Sample plot is located in upland. Photo:23.

HYDROLOGY













Page: 121 of 264









OBL species 0 % x 1 = 0

FACW species 25 % x 2 = 50

FAC species 35 % x 3 = 105

FACU species 80 % x 4 = 320

UPL species 10 % x 5 = 50


Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.5














Dominant Species?

Indicator Status

1. % 2. % 3. % 4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

0 % = Total Cover


1. Pinus strobus 30 % Y FACU2. Abies balsamea 10 % Y FAC3. Populus tremuloides 10 % Y FAC4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

50 % = Total Cover


1. Poa pratensis 30 % Y FACU2. Fraxinus nigra 20 % Y FACW3. Taraxacum officinale 20 % Y FACU4. Rubus idaeus 15 % N FAC5. Fragaria vesca 10 % N UPL6. Onoclea sensibilis 5 % N FACW7. % 8. % 9. %

10. % 11. % 12. %

100 % = Total Cover


1. % 2. % 3. % 4. %




Page: 122 of 264





0-6 2.5Y 2.5/1 100 sandy loam 6-12 2.5Y 2.5/1 60 5YR 3/4 30 C M sandy clay

7.5YR 5/6 10 C M 12-24 10YR 5/4 95 7.5YR 5/6 5 C M sand



Histosol (A1)


Black Histic (A3)







Sandy Redox (S5)
























Remarks: Hydric soil indicator F6 is present.


Page: 123 of 264








Soil Map Unit Name: Carlisle muck, 0-2% slopes, cool NWI Classification: PFO4/1B








HYDROLOGY







(inches):Surface Water Present? 0.50Water Table Present? surface




Remarks: Wetland hydrology indicators A1, A2, A3, B9, D2, and D5 are present.


Page: 124 of 264





























Dominant Species?

Indicator Status

1. Tsuga canadensis 50 % Y FACU2. Thuja occidentalis 40 % Y FACW3. Populus tremuloides 25 % N FAC4. Betula alleghaniensis 15 % N FAC5. % 6. % 7. %

130 % = Total Cover


1. Betula alleghaniensis 10 % Y FAC2. Fraxinus nigra 2 % N FACW3. % 4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

12 % = Total Cover


1. Onoclea sensibilis 25 % Y FACW2. Ribes americanum 20 % Y FACW3. Equisetum arvense 15 % Y FAC4. Carex vaginata 15 % Y OBL5. % 6. % 7. % 8. % 9. %

10. % 11. % 12. %

75 % = Total Cover


1. % 2. % 3. % 4. %




Page: 125 of 264





0-8 2.5Y 2.5/1 100 muck 20% OM8-24 10YR 5/2 90 7.5YR 5/6 10 C M sand



Histosol (A1)


Black Histic (A3)







Sandy Redox (S5)


























Page: 126 of 264








Soil Map Unit Name: Carlisle muck, 0-2% slopes, cool NWI Classification: PFO4/1B








HYDROLOGY











Remarks: Wetland hydrology indicators A1, A2, A3, D2, and D5 are present.


Page: 127 of 264




Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)

Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B)

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)























Dominant Species?

Indicator Status

1. % 2. % 3. % 4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

0 % = Total Cover


1. % 2. % 3. % 4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

0 % = Total Cover


1. Eleocharis palustris 30 % Y OBL2. Phalaris arundinacea 20 % Y FACW3. Onoclea sensibilis 20 % Y FACW4. Symphyotrichum lanceolatum 15 % Y FACW5. Carex vulpinoidea 5 % N OBL6. % 7. % 8. % 9. %

10. % 11. % 12. %

90 % = Total Cover


1. % 2. % 3. % 4. %




Page: 128 of 264





0-2 2.5Y 2.5/1 100 muck 2-16 10YR 5/2 75 7.5YR 5/6 15 C M sand

2.5Y 2.5/1 10 C M 16-24 10YR 4/1 90 7.5YR 5/6 10 C M sand



Histosol (A1)


Black Histic (A3)







Sandy Redox (S5)
























Remarks: Hydric soil indicator S5 is present.


Page: 129 of 264








Soil Map Unit Name: Kalkaska loamy sand, 2-6% slopes NWI Classification: N/A








HYDROLOGY













Page: 130 of 264





























Dominant Species?

Indicator Status

1. % 2. % 3. % 4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

0 % = Total Cover


1. % 2. % 3. % 4. % 5. % 6. % 7. %

0 % = Total Cover


1. Fragaria vesca 20 % Y UPL2. Populus tremuloides 10 % Y FACU3. Taraxacum officinale 10 % Y FACU4. Plantago lanceolata 10 % Y FACU5. Prunus serotina 5 % N FACU6. % 7. % 8. % 9. %

10. % 11. % 12. %

55 % = Total Cover


1. % 2. % 3. % 4. %




Page: 131 of 264





0-2 10YR 3/2 100 sandy loam 2-5 10YR 3/2 80 7.5Y 5/6 20 C M sandy loam



Histosol (A1)


Black Histic (A3)







Sandy Redox (S5)























Restrictive Layer (if observed): Hydric Soil Present? Type: compact soil Depth (inches): 5 Yes No

Remarks: Hydric soil indicator F7 is present. Tried additional soil pits, restrictive layer was still present.


Page: 132 of 264

wetland delineation report

Documents