volar plating of 5th metacarpal neck fractures · mc volar plating poster presentation 2 created...

1
Lim Beng Hai 1 , Chan May Fong 2 , Gan Aaron 1 , Downey Maria 1 1 Centre for Hand and Reconstructive Microsurgery, 2 National University Health System, Singapore Volar Plating of 5 th Metacarpal Neck Fractures Fractures of the 5 th metacarpal neck, also known as a boxers fracture, are one of the most common presentations in injuries of the hand 1 . Current surgical fixation techniques include percutaneous Kirschner wire fixation, intramedullary Kirshner wire or pin fixation, tension-band wiring, external fixation and dorsal plating 2,3,4. . A novel surgical technique has been utilized in our clinic, approaching the fracture and fixating from the volar aspect of the hand. 5 th Metacarpal fractures are typically dorsally angulated and the biomechanical advantage of using the volar approach is that the buttressing effect of the fixation prevents volar collapse. This study presents the outcomes following this approach. Introduction A retrospective investigation was carried out of the medical records of all patients who underwent surgical fixation of 5 th metacarpal neck fracture using a volar approach performed in our centre between 2014-2018. Fifteen patients had undergone the surgical procedure. The mean age at time of surgery was 42 years (range 15-79years). A wrist cock-up orthosis was fabricated for all patients and worn intermittently for 3 weeks. This splint was selected as it enables early functional use of the hand post-operatively and with the use of a flexion strap to the 5 th digit (Figure 1) passive flexion of the MCPJ is facilitated as early as possible post-operatively. QuickDASH : At 1-week post-operatively the mean score was 64.8 showing a clear limitation in activities of daily living. Quick-DASH values upon discharge were significantly lower, with a mean score of 3.2. Range of Motion: Chart 1 presents the total active motion of the 5 th digit and the range of flexion of the MCPJ. Functional range of motion at the MCPJ is 61° degrees of flexion 5 . At 6 weeks, 86% of patients achieved this or more. Grip strength: At 12 weeks, grip strength had improved with the affected side scoring an average of 2.5% more than the unaffected side (Chart 2). Radiographic parameters: All fifteen patients showed evidence of radiographic healing in the form of callus formation and remodelling by the 12-week mark. The patients recruited for the study had fractures with dorsal angulation ranging from 50° to 65°. Mean change in the neck shaft angle value post-operatively was 44.3°. Results Early rehabilitation is crucial to enable patients to regain their hand function for activities of daily living and work. At 6 weeks, 86% of patients had achieved or surpassed the functional range of motion at the MCPJ, suggesting that patients were able to return to most functional tasks at 6 weeks post-operatively. Hypertrophic palmar scarring and scar contracture from poorly placed palmar incisions are a risk post-operatively. An advantage of this approach, however, is that the surgical scar is on the palmar surface of the hand, which was reported to be more aesthetically pleasing to patients as compared to the dorsal approach (Figure 2). Further large scale research is required with a larger sample size and longer follow-up to determine tendon irritation from hardware and/or other potential complications. Possible future research may compare outcomes between this approach and a dorsal surgical approach in this population. Discussion and Conclusions 1. Kollitz, K.M., Hammert, W.c., Vedder, N.B., and Huang, J.I. (2014). Metacarpal fractures: treatment and complications. Hand. 9: 16-23 2. Padegimas, E.M., Warrender, W.J., Jones, C.M., et al. (2016) Metacarpal neck fractures: a review of surgical indications and techniques. Archives of Trauma Research. 5(3):e329-33. 3. Drenth, D.J., Klasen, H.J. (1998). External fixation for phalangeal and metacarpal fractures. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Britain. 0-B(2):227-230 4. Greene, T.L., Noellert, R.C., Belsole, R.J. (1987) Treatment of unstable metacarpal and phalangeal fractures with tension band wiring techniques. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 214:78-84 5. Hume, M.C., Gellman, H., McKellop, H., Brumfield, R.H. (1990).Functional range of motion of the joints of the hand. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 15. pp. 240-243 Figure 2. Pre and post-operative X-Ray and post-operative scar (Left) References Methods 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 6 weeks 12 weeks Chart 2. Grip Strength (Lbs) Affected hand Unaffected hand Figure 1. Post-operative splint with flexion strap (Above) 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Initial 6 weeks 12 weeks Chart 1. Range of Motion TAM MCPJ Flexion

Upload: others

Post on 12-Aug-2020

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Volar Plating of 5th Metacarpal Neck Fractures · MC volar plating poster presentation 2 Created Date: 20190530004338Z

Lim Beng Hai1, Chan May Fong2, Gan Aaron1, Downey Maria11Centre for Hand and Reconstructive Microsurgery, 2National University Health System, Singapore

Volar Plating of 5th Metacarpal Neck Fractures

Fractures of the 5th metacarpal neck, also known as a boxersfracture, are one of the most common presentations in injuriesof the hand1. Current surgical fixation techniques includepercutaneous Kirschner wire fixation, intramedullary Kirshnerwire or pin fixation, tension-band wiring, external fixation anddorsal plating2,3,4.. A novel surgical technique has been utilizedin our clinic, approaching the fracture and fixating from the volaraspect of the hand. 5th Metacarpal fractures are typicallydorsally angulated and the biomechanical advantage of usingthe volar approach is that the buttressing effect of the fixationprevents volar collapse. This study presents the outcomesfollowing this approach.

Introduction

A retrospective investigation was carried out of the medicalrecords of all patients who underwent surgical fixation of 5th

metacarpal neck fracture using a volar approach performed inour centre between 2014-2018. Fifteen patients had undergonethe surgical procedure. The mean age at time of surgery was42 years (range 15-79years).

A wrist cock-up orthosis was fabricated for all patients and wornintermittently for 3 weeks. This splint was selected as it enablesearly functional use of the hand post-operatively and with theuse of a flexion strap to the 5th digit (Figure 1) passive flexion ofthe MCPJ is facilitated as early as possible post-operatively.

QuickDASH: At 1-week post-operatively the mean score was64.8 showing a clear limitation in activities of daily living.Quick-DASH values upon discharge were significantly lower,with a mean score of 3.2.

Range of Motion: Chart 1 presents the total active motion ofthe 5th digit and the range of flexion of the MCPJ. Functionalrange of motion at the MCPJ is 61° degrees of flexion5. At 6weeks, 86% of patients achieved this or more.

Grip strength: At 12 weeks, grip strength had improved withthe affected side scoring an average of 2.5% more than theunaffected side (Chart 2).

Radiographic parameters: All fifteen patients showedevidence of radiographic healing in the form of callusformation and remodelling by the 12-week mark. The patientsrecruited for the study had fractures with dorsal angulationranging from 50° to 65°. Mean change in the neck shaft anglevalue post-operatively was 44.3°.

Results

Early rehabilitation is crucial to enable patients to regain theirhand function for activities of daily living and work. At 6weeks, 86% of patients had achieved or surpassed thefunctional range of motion at the MCPJ, suggesting thatpatients were able to return to most functional tasks at 6weeks post-operatively.

Hypertrophic palmar scarring and scar contracture frompoorly placed palmar incisions are a risk post-operatively. Anadvantage of this approach, however, is that the surgical scaris on the palmar surface of the hand, which was reported tobe more aesthetically pleasing to patients as compared to thedorsal approach (Figure 2).

Further large scale research is required with a larger samplesize and longer follow-up to determine tendon irritation fromhardware and/or other potential complications. Possiblefuture research may compare outcomes between thisapproach and a dorsal surgical approach in this population.

Discussion and Conclusions

1. Kollitz, K.M., Hammert, W.c., Vedder, N.B., and Huang, J.I. (2014). Metacarpal fractures: treatment and complications. Hand. 9: 16-232. Padegimas, E.M., Warrender, W.J., Jones, C.M., et al. (2016) Metacarpal neck fractures: a review of surgical indications and techniques. Archives of Trauma Research.

5(3):e329-33.3. Drenth, D.J., Klasen, H.J. (1998). External fixation for phalangeal and metacarpal fractures. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Britain. 0-B(2):227-2304. Greene, T.L., Noellert, R.C., Belsole, R.J. (1987) Treatment of unstable metacarpal and phalangeal fractures with tension band wiring techniques. Clinical Orthopaedics and

Related Research. 214:78-845. Hume, M.C., Gellman, H., McKellop, H., Brumfield, R.H. (1990).Functional range of motion of the joints of the hand. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 15. pp. 240-243

Figure 2. Pre and post-operative X-Ray and post-operative scar (Left)

References

Methods

0102030405060708090

6 weeks 12 weeks

Chart 2. Grip Strength (Lbs)

Affected hand Unaffected hand

Figure 1. Post-operative splint with flexion strap (Above)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Initial 6 weeks 12 weeks

Chart 1. Range of Motion

TAM MCPJ Flexion