validating rtofs surface currents with drifter trajectories

19
Matt Sienkiewicz Department of Marine and Environmental Systems

Upload: wyoming-reeves

Post on 31-Dec-2015

24 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Validating RTOFS Surface Currents with Drifter Trajectories. Matt Sienkiewicz Department of Marine and Environmental Systems. Why model ocean currents?. Marine forecasts Conduct SAR operations Atmosphere-Ocean coupled hurricane prediction models Forecast oil slick movement. Oil. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Validating RTOFS Surface Currents with Drifter Trajectories

Matt SienkiewiczDepartment of Marine and Environmental Systems

Page 2: Validating RTOFS Surface Currents with Drifter Trajectories

Marine forecasts Conduct SAR operations Atmosphere-Ocean coupled hurricane

prediction models Forecast oil slick movement

Oil

MODIS 19 JULY 2010

Page 3: Validating RTOFS Surface Currents with Drifter Trajectories

A warm water current that sheds anticyclonic eddies once or twice a year.

Page 4: Validating RTOFS Surface Currents with Drifter Trajectories

Implemented in 2005 One-day nowcast and 6-day forecast (144

hours) Curvilinear coordinate system Based on Hybrid Coordinate Ocean Model

(HYCOM) Covers entire Atlantic basin

Page 5: Validating RTOFS Surface Currents with Drifter Trajectories

(Mehra and Rivin, 2009)

GoM: 4-5 km

Page 6: Validating RTOFS Surface Currents with Drifter Trajectories

Sea surface height – satellite altimetry data Sea surface temperature – AVHRR Diurnal and Semi-diurnal tides River outflow and freshwater flux – USGS In situ measurements

◦ CTD casts◦ Argo floats

Page 7: Validating RTOFS Surface Currents with Drifter Trajectories

Two drifters deployed in eastern edge of Loop Current

Drifters report lat/lon every hour

Page 8: Validating RTOFS Surface Currents with Drifter Trajectories

87803

87806

Page 9: Validating RTOFS Surface Currents with Drifter Trajectories

Exit Loop Current

Page 10: Validating RTOFS Surface Currents with Drifter Trajectories

Four separate trajectories initialized at actual drifter location at:◦ Deployment◦ 14 Jun 00Z◦ 18 Jun 00Z◦ 21 Jun 00Z

Trajectories run out to 144th forecast hour, except on 14 Jun (96th hour)

Page 11: Validating RTOFS Surface Currents with Drifter Trajectories

87803

Page 12: Validating RTOFS Surface Currents with Drifter Trajectories

87803

16 JUN 2010

18 JU

N 2

010

24 JUN 201027 JU

N 2

010

Page 13: Validating RTOFS Surface Currents with Drifter Trajectories

87803

87806

Page 14: Validating RTOFS Surface Currents with Drifter Trajectories

87806

Page 15: Validating RTOFS Surface Currents with Drifter Trajectories

87806

16 JUN 2010

18 JUN

2010

24 JUN 2010

24 JUN

2010

Page 16: Validating RTOFS Surface Currents with Drifter Trajectories

R2 = 0.9846

Page 17: Validating RTOFS Surface Currents with Drifter Trajectories

3

4

21

0

0 32

1

4

50km

Mean distance from center point.

•Looking for areas in RTOFS most sensitive to error•Analysis run for entire Gulf of Mexico•Initial time 00Z on 10 Jun 2010•Run for 120 hours of forecasts

Page 18: Validating RTOFS Surface Currents with Drifter Trajectories

Beginning 10 JUN 2010 00Z

Max mean spread: 275.1 km

Page 19: Validating RTOFS Surface Currents with Drifter Trajectories

Large errors between drifters and RTOFS for Loop Current

Initial RTOFS placement of drifters outside of Loop Current

Outside edges of current in RTOFS seem more subjected to shear/eddies

Overall RTOFS made a poor display for this analysis in the Loop Current

Next Speaker: Cory Hodes