v31m6 001_0 tbe for pipeline,plem,spm

NSRP Complex Project

Nghi Son, Vietnam

Nghi Son Refinery and Petrochemical

Limited Liability Company

Employer Doc. No.

Contractor Doc. No.

QV31M6-001

Rev. 0 of 13

Employer Contract No.: XXXXX, Contractor JOB Code: 0-6495-20 Date: 27/SEP/13

Rev Date Page Description Prep'd Chk'd App'd 0 27/SEP/13 13 For Construction D.C. A.Y. M.Y. A 10/JUL/13 13 For Approval D.C. T.F. M.Y.

Operation Centre JOB Code: Operation Centre Doc. No.:

Responsible Company JVD

Prepared by D.Cano

Checked by A.Yoshida

Approved by M.Yamaguchi

TECHNICAL BID EVALUATION FOR

PIPELINE, PLEM AND SPM EPC PACKAGE

Unit No.: Not Applicable

Document Class: Z

Issue Purpose For Construction

INDRA27-SEP-2013

NSRP Complex Project Employer Doc. No.

Rev. 0

Title: TECHNICAL BID EVALUATION FOR PIPELINE, PLEM AND SPM EPC PACKAGE

Contractor Doc. No.

QV31M6-001 of 13

CONTENTS

1 SCOPE .................................................................................................................................................. 3

2 WORK ................................................................................................................................................... 3

3 BIDDERS TO BE EVALUATED ........................................................................................................... 3

4 TECHNICAL BID EVALUATION RESULTS ........................................................................................ 3

5 OVERALL EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDED CONTRACTOR ................................................... 3

ATTACHMENT-1 TECHNICAL BID EVALUATION TABLE ............................................................................. 5

ATTACHMENT-2A DEVIATION / ALTERNATIVE / CLARIFICATION LIST (SKC) ....................................... 11

ATTACHMENT-2B DEVIATION / ALTERNATIVE / CLARIFICATION LIST (TP) .......................................... 12

ATTACHMENT-2C DEVIATION / ALTERNATIVE / CLARIFICATION LIST (PLL) ....................................... 13

INDRA27-SEP-2013


Rev. 0


Contractor Doc. No.

QV31M6-001 of 13

1 SCOPE

This report describes the technical bid evaluation and recommendation for award of the PIPELINE, PLEM AND SPM EPC PACKAGE. Evaluation of the commercial part of the proposals is outside the scope of this report.

2 WORK

The Inquiry was for the Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) of the following facilities:

a) Two 35km 48” crude oil import pipelines from SPM to shore; (EPC)

b) One fiber optic cable (FOC) from SPM to shore; (EPC)

c) One PLEM; (C)

d) One SPM buoy with anchor chain mooring; (C)

e) Associated floating and under-buoy loading hoses and umbilical (C)

3 BIDDERS TO BE EVALUATED

JGCS issued the Inquiry to the following 3 Bidders:

a) SK Engineering and Construction (SKC)

b) Technip Singapore Pte Ltd/PetroVietnam Technical Services Corporation (TP)

c) Punji Lloyd Ltd (PLL)

JGCS received proposals from the 3 Bidders, and all 3 proposals were evaluated and results are shown in this report.

4 TECHNICAL BID EVALUATION RESULTS

After a careful review of each proposal and succeeding clarifications, a technical evaluation of each proposal was conducted. Detailed technical bid evaluation results are summarized in the following attachment:

Attachment-1: Technical Bid Evaluation Table

Attachment-2a: Deviation/Alternative/Clarification List (SKC)

Attachment-2b: Deviation/Alternative/Clarification List (TP)

Attachment-2a: Deviation/Alternative/Clarification List (PLL)

5 OVERALL EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDED CONTRACTOR

The PLL initial submission was considered poor and the additional information provided was not adequate to raise the standard of the document and increase confidence in their technical competency. Based on the limited information provided, the proposed laybarge, Kuber, is deemed to have inadequate tensioner capacity for this project.

INDRA27-SEP-2013


Rev. 0


Contractor Doc. No.

QV31M6-001 of 13

TP is considered technically acceptable as it met all the key requirements, although the backfilling thickness for the piggyback FOC is to be clarified. The proposed lay barge capacity is sufficient for this project, and the construction plan is well established. No technical deficiencies were observed.

SK Corporation is considered technically acceptable and has demonstrated that the work scope has been understood, and the method statements presented gave confidence that they can reasonably be easily made project-specific. Most method statements fulfilled the project specification requirements. SKC proposed two laybarges, Stingray and HD2500 and both are acceptable, but based on lay tension capacity requirements, HD2500 is recommended.

It must be highlighted that SKC does not own any of the marine equipment, it relies on the support of third parties, as well as for the design engineering. As such, an early commitment from SKC to lock in the preferred subcontractors and equipment is desirable. This is particularly crucial for the laybarge (HD2500) where the availability of a similar capacity vessel is limited in the region. This also applies to TP’s proposed laybarge Global 1201.

A summary of the Technical Evaluation is presented in Attachment 1, based on a traffic light system for each category of scope considered; Green is technically acceptable, Yellow is acceptable with concerns, while Red is not acceptable.

Base on this evaluation, both SKC and TP are technically acceptable. PLL, however, is not technically acceptable, primarily due to insufficient technical details provided and the unsuitability of the proposed laybarge.

INDRA27-SEP-2013


Rev. 0


Contractor Doc. No.

QV31M6-001 of 13

ATTACHMENT-1 TECHNICAL BID EVALUATION TABLE

ITEM DESCRIPTION SKC PLL TP

RAN K RAN K RAN K

A RECO RDS

A.1 Track Records 1 1 1

Bidder to provide details of similar work within the past five (5)

years not limited to the following:

· Civil works (sheet pile/cofferdam/hold back anchors) & Shore

Pull

√ √ √

· Large Diameter Shallow Water Installation √ √ √

· Trench and Backfilling √ √ √

· SPM & FOC installation √ √ √

· PLEM installation √ √ √

· Pre Commissioning √ √ √

B EQ U IPM EN T

Bidder to demonstrate the capability of providing the following

equipment for each scope of work but not limited to the items as

below.

B.1 Lay Barge 1 3 1

Barge draft limitation √ √ √

Tensioner Capacity (>200MT) √ x √

Lifting Capacity (>250MT) √ √ √

INDRA27-SEP-2013


Rev. 0


Contractor Doc. No.

QV31M6-001 of 13

B.2 Civil Work and Site preparation 1 1 1

Pre-entry site, Site office preparation, topsoil & storage,

excavation, construction of access roads and temporary drainage,

backfilling and reinstatements. √ √ √

Installation of temporary rock berm, sheet piled cofferdam and

Hold back anchor wall. √ √ √

B.3 Beach Pull Pipeline Installation 1 1 1

Linear Winch and Holdback Anchors √ √ √

Machinery and Equipment involved: √ √ √

· Buoyancy Aids

· Pulling Head

B.4 Trenching & Dredging. 1 1 1

Nearshore and offshore trenching/dredging √ √ √

B.5 Backfilling 1 1 1

Dredger √ √ √

B.6 ROV Spread 1 1 1

Complete ROV and/or Diver spread √ √

B.7 PLEM Installation 1 1 1

Equipment involved specified √ √ √

B.8 SPM Installation 1 1 1

Equipment involved specified √ √ √

INDRA27-SEP-2013


Rev. 0


Contractor Doc. No.

QV31M6-001 of 13

B.9 Fibre Optic Cable Installation 1 2 2

Equipment involved specified √

B.10 Survey spread 1 1 1

Sidescan √ √ √

Bathymetric √ √ √

UXO √ √

B.11 Other Marine Spreads 1 1 1

Anchor Handling Tug √ √ √

Material Barge √ √ √

B.12 Welding and NDT 1 1 1

Automatic welding √ √ √

100% UT √ √ √

C CO N STRU CTIO N M ETHO DO LO GY / EXECU TIO N PLAN 1 2 2

· Pre Trenching √ √ √

· Shore approach /shore pull √ √ √

· Civil works (sheet pile/cofferdam/hold back anchors) √ √ √

· Pre and Post Survey works √ √ √

· Pipe laying √ x √

· Pipe touchdown monitoring √ √ √

· FOC Installation and emergencies √ (A) (A)

· SPM installation √ √ √

INDRA27-SEP-2013


Rev. 0


Contractor Doc. No.

QV31M6-001 of 13

· PLEM installation √ √ √

· Pipeline laydown and Tie-in to PLEM √ √ √

· Trench Backfill √ √

· Environmental Monitoring

· Hydrotesting √ √ √

· System leak test √ √ √

· Dewatering and purging

· Computer pipe tracking system x x x

D Key Exhibits of the CO N TRACT 1 2 1

SPLIT OF WORK √ √

Qualification Statement / Other Clauses (if applicable). √ √

E PRO JECT SCHEDU LE 1 1 1

. Engineering √ √ √

· Pre survey √ √ √

. Cofferdam & shore pull √ √ √

. Transportation √ √ √

· Pipeline installation √ √ √

. Backfilling √ √ √

· PLEM and SPM installation √ √ √

· Pre-commissioning √ √ √

F SU BCO N TRACTIN G 1 1 1

INDRA27-SEP-2013


Rev. 0


Contractor Doc. No.

QV31M6-001 of 13

· Trenching/dredging/backfilling √ √ √

· Surveys √ √ √

· Pipeline installation √

· SPM/PLEM installation √

· Pre-commissioning √ √

· Engineering √ √

G EN GIN EERIN G CAPABILITY 1 2 1

Bidder has sufficient engineering capability such as :

· Installation Engineering √ √ √

· Detailed Design Engineering √ √

H PRO JECT O RGAN ISATIO N AN D PERSO N N EL 1 2 1

· Project organisation charts √ √ √

· Personnel √ √

I Q A/Q C PRO GRAM 1 1 1

Bidder has established QA / QC plans √ & (B) √ √ & (B)

J ITP PRO GRAM

Bidder has established ITP system (B) (B)

INDRA27-SEP-2013


Rev. 0


Contractor Doc. No.

QV31M6-001 of 13

K THIRD PARTY CERTIFICATIO N 1 2 2

Bidders shall comply with the requirements for 3rd party

certifications. √

L TECHN ICAL EXCEPTIO N S 1 2 2

√

O VERALL SCO RE :

1 3 1

N otes: 1) Box with no "ticks" indicates either not applicable, no information or not included in

proposal

2) (A) is Acceptable with concerns and/or qualifications

3) (B) Bidder agrees to establish project specific plans upon award

TRAFFIC LIGHT RAN KIN G SYSTEM

1 Acceptable

2 Acceptable with concerns

3 Not Acceptable

INDRA27-SEP-2013


Rev. 0

Title: TECHNICAL BID EVALUATION FOR PIPELINE, PLEM AND SPM EPC PACKAGE Contractor Doc. No.

QV31M6-001 of 13

ATTACHMENT-2A DEVIATION / ALTERNATIVE / CLARIFICATION LIST (SKC)

Req. No.: NA Item No.: NA Bidder Name: SK E&C

Document No. & Rev.

Paragraph No. and Title

None None NA None NA3550-8210-83-150-0001 RevD1 Alignment Sheet Drawing

Detail indicates one trench only for the two 48" Crude Oil P/L

A SKC prefers to use Dual trench from KP4 to KP34.5

Acceptable

3550-8210-83-150-0001 RevD1 Alignment Sheet Drawing

Drawing note indicates FOC to be laid along pipeline corridor only. C

SKC proposed to install the FOC as dual lay with the pipeline and lay on the bottom of the trench next to the pipeline

Acceptable


Detail indicates that backfill shall be done until the seabed level with 1m min cover

C

Indigenous soil will be used for backfilling until top of pipe and natural backfill is relied upon to achieve the remaining 1m top of pipe cover between KP4 to KP34.5

Acceptable

3550-8210-84-150-0001 RevD1 Crude Pipeline Spool-Piece

Detail indicates goose neck spool will be used at PLEM tie-in A

SKC proposed as an alternative to use trench transition instead of the goose neck spool at the PLEM tie-in.

Acceptable as long as SKC ensures that pipe stresses on-bottom stabilisation are acceptable.

It will be decided on the detail design stage.

NSRP Complex Project Sheet 1 of 1

Description: Package C

Project Requirement Mark * Description of Deviation/Alternative/Clarification Contractor’s Position Remarks

Mark * A = Alternative, D = Deviation (Exception), C = Clarification

INDRA27-SEP-2013


Rev. 0


QV31M6-001 of 13

ATTACHMENT-2B DEVIATION / ALTERNATIVE / CLARIFICATION LIST (TP)

Req. No.: NA Item No.: NA Bidder Name: Technip/PetroVietnam

Document No. & Rev.



Detail indicates one trench only for the two 48" Crude Oil P/L

ATP proposed dual trench of 5m from KP4 to KP34.5

Acceptable


Drawing note indicates FOC to be laid along pipeline corridor only.

ATP proposed to install the FOC, piggy backed onto one of the pipeline.

Not Acceptable until the concern mentioned in Remarks is resolved.

There is requirement of 1m cover to the top of FOC after backfilling.



Project Requirement Mark *Description of

Deviation/Alternative/ClarificationContractor’s Position Remarks


INDRA27-SEP-2013


Rev. 0


QV31M6-001 of 13

ATTACHMENT-2C DEVIATION / ALTERNATIVE / CLARIFICATION LIST (PLL)

Req. No.: NA Item No.: NA Bidder Name: Punji Lloyd

Document No. & Rev.



Drawing note indicates FOC to be laid along pipeline corridor only.

AFor FOC installation, PLL preferred method is FOC piggybacked with the Pipeline

Not Acceptable until the concern mentioned in Remarks is resolved.

There is requirement of 1m cover to the top of FOC after backfilling.



Project Requirement Mark *Description of

Deviation/Alternative/ClarificationContractor’s Position Remarks


INDRA27-SEP-2013

v31m6 001_0 tbe for pipeline,plem,spm

Documents

technical evaluation

technical bid evaluation

spm epc package contractor

construction epc

overall evaluation

spm epc package unit

spm buoy

plem c d