use chelation therapy to reduce iron overload and improve survival in patients with myelodysplastic...
TRANSCRIPT
DISEASE MANAGEMENT
Use chelation therapy to reduce iron overload and improvesurvival in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes
Most patients with myelodysplastic syndromes require
red blood cell transfusions to treat their chronic anaemia.
This leads to an increased risk of transfusional iron over-
load, which has been associated with adverse effects on
survival. Based on limited data, iron chelation therapy ap-
pears to have beneficial effects in these patients.
Syndromes have serious risks
Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are clonal disorders
of haematopoietic progenitor cells, which are characterized
by ineffective haematopoiesis and the risk of transformation
from MDS to acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). Lower-risk
MDS is associated with increased apoptosis, which can lead
to peripheral blood cytopenias,[1] while clonal evolution is
the predominant feature of higher-risk MDS, predisposing
the patient to AML progression.[2]
This article summarizes a review on treating iron over-
load in patients with MDS by Leitch.[3]
Usual approach is supportive care
The majority of patients with MDS are elderly, with
>85% presenting at age ‡70 years, making them ineligible
for aggressive therapies such as curative haematopoietic
stem cell transplantation (SCT).[3] Although effective alter-
native treatment options have recently become available
(e.g. decitabine, lenolidamide and azacitidine), these are not
always suitable for some patients. Therefore, supportive care
is the usual treatment approach in MDS, with the aim of
minimizing the impact of cytopenias and to maintain health-
related quality of life (HR-QOL), although these interven-
tions do not generally alter the course of disease.[3]
Dependence on transfusion increasing
Many patients with MDS are dependent on red blood cell
(RBC) transfusions to manage their chronic anaemia from
the time they present with the disease, with the proportion
increasing with time, progressive bone marrow failure and
patient age.[3] In fact, most patients eventually require trans-
fusion for anaemia. New treatment options offer an alter-
native to transfusions, although they may not be appropriate
for all patients; »40% of MDS patients currently receive
RBC transfusion as the only intervention.[3]
Dependence on RBC transfusion can place MDS patients
at an increased risk of iron overload and, ultimately, may
adversely affect survival.[3-5] For example, in a study in 426
MDS patients,[5] transfusion-dependent patients had in-
creased iron levels (assessed by ferritin levels), and inferior
overall and leukaemia-free survival relative to non-transfusion
dependent patients. Moreover, overall and leukaemia-free
survival progressively decreased by the degree of trans-
fusion dependence (hazard ratio 1.36 and 1.40, respectively,
for each additional RBC unit transfused every 4 weeks).[5]
Iron overload linked to several factors
As there is no mechanism for excreting iron from the
body, the reticuloendothelial system can be readily over-
whelmed in patients who are regularly transfused.[3] The
following factors, all of which increase transferrin satura-
tion, may contribute to iron overload in MDS:[3]
� RBC transfusion (leads to increased macrophage iron);� ineffective erythropoiesis (leads to increased absorption
of iron by the gastrointestinal tract via hepcidin and
ferroportin);� myelosupressive therapy (leads to decreased iron utiliza-
tion through decreased erythropoiesis).
Outcome is oxidative stress and organdamage
Significant parenchymal iron loading can result in
transferrin saturation and the generation of non-transferrin
bound iron, which can participate in oxidative reactions and
cause cellular damage, with mitochondrial DNA thought to
be particularly susceptible.[3]
In patients with b-thalassaemia, it is well established that
iron overload can induce organ damage and may contribute
to early death.[1] Similar, albeit more indirect, data are be-
ginning to emerge in patients with MDS. Transfusion-
dependent patients with MDS have a high incidence of
arrhythmia, chronic heart failure (CHF), hepatic dysfunc-
tion, hepatic fibrosis and glucose intolerance, which were
the cause of death in many patients.[3] In a recent retro-
spective study in patients with MDS or other haemopoietic
disorders, transfusion therapy significantly (p £ 0.0025) in-creased the risk of conduction/rhythm disorders (odds ratio
Drugs Ther Perspect 2011; Vol. 27, No. 9
14
[OR] 4.18), liver disease (OR 0.31) and diabetes mellitus
(OR 5.05).[6]
Cardiac disease appears to the main cause of non-
leukemic death in MDS (incidence >50%) and has been
correlated with serum ferritin level.[3] Over 3 years in a US
Medicare population, 74% of MDS patients experienced
cardiac events, including arrhythmia, CHF and infarction,
with these events predominantly occurring in transfused pa-
tients (79% vs 54% for non-transfused patients; p< 0.0001).[7]
However, cardiac tissue iron deposits do not appear to in-
crease in transfusional patients with MDS, suggesting other
mechanisms, such as oxidative stress or anaemia, may ac-
count for this effect. Death related to hepatic dysfunction is
also associated with transfusion frequency and increased
ferritin level.[8] Further studies are required with regard to
the effects of iron overload on endocrine and cardiac func-
tion in MDS patients.
Poorer outcomes for higher-risk patients
In higher-risk MDS patients and in the intensive chemo-
therapy and SCT settings, iron overload may be predictive of
poorer outcomes (i.e. decreased overall survival and higher
mortality rates), as a result of increased transplant-related
mortality, infections and leukaemic progression.[9] Toxicity
from iron overload in these settings may be related to oxi-
dative stress (presence of non-transferrin bound iron) and
infection risk (bacterial and fungal utilization of iron).[3]
There is also preclinical evidence to suggest progression to
AML is via iron-mediated dysregulation of cellular growth
and differentiation, with these effects ameliorated when iron
levels were reduced.[3]
Many methods for monitoring iron
Serum ferritin level is the simplest and most widely used
measure for monitoring iron load; however, values may be
affected by many variables, such as inflammation, tissue
damage and abnormal hepatic function.[3] Serum ferritin
levels of <300 mg/L are considered normal, levels of >1000to <2500 mg/L indicate mild and moderate iron overload,
and levels of >2500 mg/L indicate severe iron overload.
Normal values are 20–50% for transferrin saturation and
0–0.4 mmol/L labile plasma iron, with higher values in-
dicating iron overload.
Assessing liver iron concentration by liver biopsy is limited
in MDS due to thrombocytopenia and neutropenia, which may
predispose patients to bleeding and infections. More recently,
noninvasive methods have become available, including T2*
MRI for hepatic and cardiac tissue, although measurements
generated by this technique have not yet been correlated to
clinical outcomes in MDS.[3] Although a number of techniques
for quantifying non-transferrin bound iron have recently been
developed, their use remains investigational.[3]
Chelation can correct iron balance ...
Chelators are agents that bind iron, rendering it non-toxic
and in a form that is amenable to excretion outside the
body.[3] The goal of chelation therapy in MDS is to maintain
iron balance and safe tissue iron levels by preventing
transfusion-associated accumulation of excess iron and as-
sociated end-organ dysfunction. Guidelines for chelation in
MDS generally recommend chelation in lower-risk patients
with an otherwise reasonable life expectancy (e.g. >1 year)
and evidence of transfusional iron overload.[3] MDS patients
who would benefit most from iron chelation therapy include
patients requiring transfusion of ‡2 RBC units/month for
‡1 year; patients with ferritin level >1000 ng/mL; patients
without co-morbidities that would limit prognosis; patients
who are candidates for allograft; patients in whom there is a
need to preserve organ function; patients who are unresponsive
to or ineligible for primary therapy (e.g. immunomodulatory or
hypomethylating agents).[10,11]
Chelation is also an option in some patients with higher-
risk MDS (i.e. recommended in patients who are candidates
for SCT and may be considered in patients who are re-
sponding to therapies that are able to modify life expectancy,
including SCT).[11,12]
These guidelines are limited, however, by the fact that
they have been extrapolated from experience in patients with
thalassaemia. This has generated uncertainty among clinicians
regarding treatment, which appears to be reflected in the low
proportion of patients receiving chelation therapy.[3] Rea-
sons for non-chelation in MDS include short life expectancy,
advanced patient age, co-morbidity, noncompliance and
high-risk MDS; however, the development of more convenient
formulations of deferoxamine may lead to more prompt,
widespread and persistent treatment with chelators.[3]
y and appears to be beneficial
In lower-risk transfusion-dependent MDS patients, iron
chelation therapy may lower ferritin levels, and has been
associated with improved survival according to data from
retrospective studies.[3] A prospective randomized con-
trolled trial is currently underway to further evaluate surviv-
al benefits of iron chelation.[13] Although there is evidence
to suggest that iron-chelation therapy can reverse organ
toxicity in patients with thalassaemia, data for MDS patients
are limited.[3] Preliminary data have shown a beneficial ef-
fect of chelation on hepatic function, with deferasirox
15
1172-0360/11/0009-0015/$19.95 ª 2011 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
therapy for 12 months in MDS patients (n = 341) providing
significant reductions from baseline in median ferritin
(p = 0.002) and mean ALT (p < 0.0001) levels.[14]
Furthermore, after beginning chelation, some lower-risk
MDS patients may have improvements in cells counts, with
some becoming RBC transfusion independent and others
having in a decrease in RBC transfusion requirements.[3]
Although further investigation is required, it has been pro-
posed that chelation improves marrow function by reducing
oxidative stress, altering intracellular levels of nuclear factor-
kB and increasing erythropoietin levels.[3]
Growing evidence suggests that lowering iron may be
beneficial in higher-risk MDS patients around SCT or chemo-
therapy without transplant. According to a number of small
studies of interventions to manage iron overload, phle-
botomy, chelation and antioxidant administration had a
number of beneficial outcomes (e.g. normalization of ferritin
levels, resolution of liver disease and CHF, reduced trans-
plant-related mortality, and improved event-free survival and
overall survival) in SCT patients.[3] However, chelation in
higher-risk MDS is currently only recommended for patients
who are candidates for SCT. Phlebotomy following SCT may
be a simpler intervention than chelation around SCT.[3]
Features of available chelators vary
Currently available chelators include deferoxamine, defer-
iprone and deferasirox (table I). Deferoxamine has a relatively
short half-life, and as such, must be administered as a con-
tinuous parenteral infusion in order to effectively reduce iron
levels.[3] Many patients find this route of administration cum-
bersome and access to alternative oral agents (deferiprone and
deferasirox) may be limited in some countries for regulatory
or financial reasons. An alternative twice-daily subcutaneous
Table I. Features of currently available iron chelation agents[3,10,11,16]
Deferoxamine Deferiprone Deferasirox
Approved indications in the EU
Chronic iron overload from transfusion-
dependent anaemias
Acute iron intoxication
Iron overload in pts with b-thalassaemia
when deferoxamine is contraindicated
or inadequate
Chronic iron overload due to frequent RBC
transfusions in pts with b-thalassaemia aged ‡6 y
Chronic iron overload due to RBC transfusions when
deferoxamine is contraindicated or inadequate in the
following pt groups: pts with other anaemias; pts aged
2–5 y; pts with b-thalassaemia with iron overload due
to infrequent blood transfusion
Available formulations
Injection (powder for reconstitution)
[subcutaneous or intravenous infusion]
Oral tablet or solution Oral dispersible tablets (disperse in water, or orange
or apple juice before administration)
Suggested dosage in pts with myelodysplastic syndromes[10]a
20–60mg/kg/day infused over ‡8–12 h for
‡5 day/wkb75–100mg/kg/day in three divided
doses
20–30mg/kg once daily
Elimination half-life (excretion route)
20–30 min (urinary, faecal) 3–4 h (urinary) 8–16 h (faecal)
Potentially serious adverse effects
Injection-site reaction
Ocular and/or otic toxicity
Blood dyscrasias, particularly
agranulocytosis (rare)
Renal insufficiency (usually reversible or non-
progressive) occurs in up to one-third of pts (may
require dose adjustments or interruptions)
Gastrointestinal disturbances (including ulceration
and fatal haemorrhage)
Monitoring requirements
Pts should be monitored as per recommendations in each agent’s prescribing information
Monitor iron levels (e.g. based on serum ferritin levels and transferrin saturation, and, where available, hepatic and/or cardiac T2* MRI, and
non-transferrin bound iron, labile plasma iron and reactive oxygen species levels) at least every 3 mo in pts receiving transfusions
Monitor organ function (cardiac, hepatic, endocrine) where indicated
Monitor for iron-chelation agent-related adverse events (e.g. ocular, otic or renal toxicity, gastrointestinal ulceration or bleeding, blood disorders,
delayed development in children) where indicated
a Starting dosage is adjusted according to transfusion requirements, the goal of therapy (i.e to maintain or reduce body iron) and adverse effects.
Treatment should be continued for as long as transfusion therapy continues and/or as long as iron overload remains clinically relevant.
b Therapeutic index (mean daily dose [mg/kg]/serum ferritin [ng/mL]) should be kept <0.025 at all times to avoid audiometric, retinal and skeletal
toxicity.
RBC = red blood cells; pts = patients.
16
Drugs Ther Perspect 2011; Vol. 27, No. 9
bolus formulation of deferoxamine has shown promising re-
sults with a good safety profile in a limited number of patients,
although rebound non-transferrin bound iron can occur with
this treatment. An extended-release formulation of deferox-
amine is currently in preclinical stage of development.[15]
Tailor chelator choice?
Different chelators are thought to act on different in-
tracellular iron pools (e.g. cytosol, nucleus and mitochon-
dria), which may have an impact on clinical endpoints,
although the reasons for these differences are not yet clear.[3]
For example, detoxification of liver iron by deferoxamine
may be related to its uptake in macrophages, the major site
of transfusional iron accumulation, while in preclinical
models, deferiprone or deferoxamine therapy resulted in
partial extraction of radiolabelled iron from cardiomyocytes,
with restoration of contractility of these cells. Further un-
derstanding of iron distribution and its relationship to clin-
ical outcomes may allow for improved chelator selection
that can be tailored to clinical circumstances.[3]
Research is currently underway that may contribute to the
development of new and improved chelators, with a focus
on the following areas:[3]
� Understanding how chelators clear iron and from which
cellular or extracellular compartments.� Elucidation of the as yet poorly defined mechanism by
which non-transferrin bound iron enters some cellular
compartments (such as mitochondria).� Developing chelators based on the structure of ferritin;
it may be possible to manipulate iron exit pores in the
ferritin cage and thus facilitate iron extraction.� Developing chelators with greater antiproliferative activ-
ity, and investigating their mechanism of action at the
molecular level.
Future studies of MDS interventions should incorporate
measures of HR-QOL and the impact of co-morbidities. In
available studies in transfusion-dependent MDS patients, HR-
QOL was impaired and many patients had co-morbidities (e.g.
diabetes and CHF) that are associated an increased risk of
death.[3] A co-morbidity index specific to MDS has been de-
veloped to predict the impact of extra-haematological co-mor-
bidities on outcome, including cardiac and hepatic disease, and
takes into account patient risk (low, medium or high risk).[17]
Disclosure
This review was adapted from Drugs 2011; 71 (2): 155-77[3] by Adis
editors and medical writers. The preparation of these articles was not
supported by any external funding.
References1. Hellstrom-Lindberg E, Schmidt-Mende J, Forsblom AM, et al.
Apoptosis in refractory anaemia with ringed sideroblasts is initiated at
the stem cell level and associated with increased activation of cas-
pases. Br J Haematol 2001; 112 (3): 714-26
2. Epling-Burnette PK, List AF. Advancements in the molecular path-
ogenesis of myelodysplastic syndrome. Curr Opin Hematol 2009;
16 (2): 70-6
3. Leitch HA. Optimizing therapy for iron overload in the myelodys-
plastic syndromes: recent developments. Drugs 2011; 71 (2): 155-77
4. Malcovati L, Porta MG, Pascutto C, et al. Prognostic factors and life
expectancy in myelodysplastic syndromes classified according to
WHO criteria: a basis for clinical decision making. J Clin Oncol 2005;
23 (30): 7594-603
5. Malcovati L, Della Porta MG, Cazzola M. Predicting survival and
leukemic evolution in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Hae-
matologica 2006; 91 (12): 1588-90
6. Delea TE, Hagiwara M, Phatak PD. Retrospective study of the associa-
tion between transfusion frequency and potential complications of iron
overload in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and other acquired
hematopoietic disorders. Curr Med Res Opin 2009; 25 (1): 139-47
7. Goldberg SL, Chen E, Corral M, et al. Incidence and clinical com-
plications of myelodysplastic syndromes among United States Medi-
care beneficiaries. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28 (17): 2847-52
8. Takatoku M, Uchiyama T, Okamoto S, et al. Retrospective nationwide
survey of Japanese patients with transfusion-dependent MDS and
aplastic anemia highlights the negative impact of iron overload on
morbidity/mortality. Eur J Haematol 2007; 78 (6): 487-94
9. Pullarkat V. Objectives of iron chelation therapy in myelodysplastic
syndromes: more than meets the eye? Blood 2009; 114 (26): 5251-5
10. Leitch HA, Vickars LM. Supportive care and chelation therapy in
MDS: are we saving lives or just lowering iron? Hematology Am Soc
Hematol Educ Program 2009: 664-72
11. Bennett JM. Consensus statement on iron overload in myelodysplastic
syndromes. Am J Hematol 2008; 83 (11): 858-61
12. Santini V, Alessandrino PE, Angelucci E, et al. Clinical management
of myelodysplastic syndromes: update of SIE, SIES, GITMO practice
guidelines. Leuk Res 2010; 34 (12): 1576-88
13. Novartis. Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) event free survival with
iron chelation therapy study (TELESTO) [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier
NCT00940602]. US National Institutes of Health, ClinicalTrials.gov
[online]. Available from URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov [Accessed
2011 Jul 13]
14. Gattermann N, Finelli C, Porta MD, et al. Deferasirox in iron-overloaded
patients with transfusion-dependent myelodysplastic syndromes: results
from the large 1-year EPIC study. Leuk Res 2010; 34 (9): 1143-50
15. Toliyat T, Jorjani M, Khorasanirad Z. An extended-release formula-
tion of desferrioxamine for subcutaneous administration. Drug Deliv
2009; 16 (7): 416-21
16. British Medical Association and the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of
Great Britain. British national formulary. No. 61. London: BMJ
Publishing Group Ltd and RPS Publishing, 2011 Mar
17. Della Porta MG, Malcovati L. Clinical relevance of extra-hematologic
comorbidity in the management of patients with myelodysplastic
syndrome. Haematologica 2009; 94 (5): 602-6
17
1172-0360/11/0009-0017/$19.95 ª 2011 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.