u.s. suburbanization and gentrification
DESCRIPTION
U.S. suburbanization and gentrification. Soc 331 Population and Society 07.15.2009. Factors that influence urban development. Technology Transportation, building construction, communication Organizational network of the community Realtors, government, citizen associations - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
U.S. suburbanization and gentrification
Soc 331Population and Society
07.15.2009
Factors that influence urban development Technology
Transportation, building construction, communication Organizational network of the community
Realtors, government, citizen associations Resource availability
Energy (fuel), land supply, income levels Population growth Individual values (U.S. desire for single family homes) Institutional structure of society
U.S. Capitalist System vs. kinship or familial systems
Role of transportation Walking (pre-1880s); 2-3 mph
Face to face communication, small but high density, little separation between home and work
Electric Street Car (1880-1920); 10-15 mph Speeds up travel and focuses activity toward city
center, some activities begin to disperse Automobile (1920-present); 25-40+ mph
Lower density, “multiple nuclei” Social class theory
Where have all the street cars gone? Increased transportation adds an element of
geographic flexibility The process of suburbanization was sped
along by the removal of streetcars in favor of automobiles
Automobile manufacturers and tire companies bought local trail lines, dismantled them and replaced them with gasoline powered buses
Seattle street car
The rise of the automobile and demise of public transit By 1990 in the U.S. 73% of all workers got to
work by driving in their automobile while an additional 13% carpooled
More people walked to work (6%) than took public transportation (5%) (1990 Census)
An accounting of Suburbanization Thought of as relatively new
1899 - Adna Weber noted than American cities were beginning to suburbanize
Really took off in the 1920s Until 1960s continued unabated
1. American desire for less dense space2. Ability to obtain that space
Increasing wealth Availability of automobile/highway transit
Trends in U.S. suburbanization Westward expansion
Karsada (1995) - in 1960 25% of all Fortune 500 firms were located in NYC, in 1990 it declined to 8%
Moving to sunbelt cities and not to city centers Near to highways and regional airports More people now commute from suburb to suburb
than commute to the city center Edge cities Center city deterioration?
A sign of the times?
Explaining Suburbanization Natural Evolution Theory (“Pull”)
“Natural” working of housing market Preference for large single-family lots Decentralization of the city is followed by employment
decentralization (serves to reinforce suburbanization process) Can have deleterious implications for city residents
Fiscal/Social Problems of Central Cities (“Push”) High taxes, poor quality schools, racial tension, crime,
congestion cause affluent to migrate which leads to further deterioration
Gentrification Influx of businesses and individuals with generally
higher SES settling in a an area with relatively lower SES Some add “displacement” to the definition - Also elements
of “improvement” Baby boom generation grew up in the suburbs to a greater
extent than any previous cohort Began to purchase and renovate cheap housing in older
parts of central cities White and upwardly mobile so linked to the gentry moving
back to the city
Impacts of gentrification Shift of rental property to owned housing Increase in existing rents Decrease in integration “Urban revitalization” Shifting populations Neighborhood turnover
Explanations (London, Lee & Lipton 1986) Demographics
Baby Boom Childless couples (less space and more income)
Ecological Industry replaced by corporation
Socio-cultural “pro-urban”, “urbanicity” is hip
Political/Economical Increase in transit, desegregation, market interaction