uae ground improvement
TRANSCRIPT
GROUND IMPROVEMENT
SITE INVESTIGATON
November 2009
Lankelma ltd Cold Harbour Barn Cold Harbour Lane Iden, East Sussex
TN31 7UT U.K.
T: +44 (0)1797 280050 E: [email protected]
www.lankelma.com
Gardline Lankelma - Abu Dhabi [email protected]
T: +971 (0)566 014916
2
Contents
1. Introduction 3
2. Role of the CPT 3
3. Compliance testing 4
4. Settlement of deep compaction fills 5
5. CPT plant 6
Appendix A
Soil behaviour charts
Appendix B
Influence of compressibility on normally consolidated, uncemented, unaged predominantly quartz sands
Appendix C
Plant capabilities
Appendix D
Soil parameters
Appendix E
Case studies
3
1. Introduction
In general terms ground improvement may be considered to be “when the
engineer forces the soil to adapt to the project requirements by altering its natural
state, rather than changing the engineering design in response to the natural
limitations of the soil”.
An overview of ground improvement techniques includes:
Densification – vibro and dynamic compaction; blasting and compaction
gravity.
Consolidation – pre-loading; vertical drains; electro-osmosis and vacuum
consolidation.
Reinforcement – soil nailing; piles; stone columns and fibre reinforcement.
Weight Reduction – wood; fly-ash; slag; tyres and geofoam.
Chemical Treatment – soil mixing; lime columns and jet/fracture grouting.
Thermal Stabilisation – ground freezing; vitrification
Biotechnical Stabilisation – brush matting; bush layering
Geosynthetics – geotextiles; geogrids and geomeshes.
A number of these techniques readily lend themselves to investigation and
compliance testing with the CPT.
2. Role of the CPT
For non-cohesive sands and silty sands requiring densification by the techniques outlined above, the CPT has been found to be one of the best methods to monitor and document the effect of densification due to the continuous and repeatable nature of the CPT process and data (see figure 1).
For shallow compaction the CPT can also be useful in checking the variability of a fill compacted in layers, or in checking whether unsatisfactory material has been left below a fill.
Figure 1
● before compaction
o after compaction
qc (MPa)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Depth
(m
)
4
In the improvement of cohesive soils by means of surcharge, with or without
vertical drains, the primary task is the monitoring of the rate of dissipation of
generated excess pore water pressures, as well as the assessment of general
variations of hydraulic conductivity of the soil. For these activities a cone
penetrometer with an additional pressure transducer (piezocone) is required.
A selection of guidelines to the zone of soil behaviour where vibrocompaction
techniques are most applicable are given on the CPT soil behaviour charts
presented in appendix A.
3. Compliance Testing
The required effect of any deep compaction technique can be set directly in terms
of measured cone resistance, or in terms of “equivalent relative density”.
Other analytical approaches that utilise the CPT platform for compliance testing of
deep compaction projects include the full displacement push pressuremeter and
the seismic cone.
The shear wave velocity obtained from the seismic cone, like the pressuremeter,
can be directly related to the small strain shear modulus (Go), and is therefore a
direct measure of the soil stiffness. Hence, a compaction specification of
compliance criterion could also include a minimum normalized shear wave
velocity, or the pressuremeter limit pressure.
A further advantage in earthquake prone geographic regions, is that the shear
wave velocity can be used as an additional measure of liquefaction potential,
especially in silty sands.
5
4. Settlement of Deep Compaction Fills
The settlement analysis is fundamental to the design of most compaction applications. The analysis requires a knowledge of the soil compressibility, that is, the soil modulus and preconsolidation stress. Since the Factor of Safety against bearing capacity failure is usually high for foundations on coarse grained soil, the designer is interested in a modulus, E25, for an average applied stress limited to a value equal to about 25% of the estimated ultimate bearing resistance. The modulus can be obtained directly from the seismic cone shear wave velocity, or the full displacement push pressuremeter, or indirectly from the average cone tip resistance as follows:
E25 = α qt where E25 = secant modulus for a stress equal to about 25% of the ultimate stress. α = an empirical coefficient qt = cone resistance
A simple approach promoted by the Canadian Foundation Engineering Manual (CFEM 1992) states that the ratio between E25 and qt is a function of both soil type and compactness and is presented on Table 1. Table 1.
α = E25 / qt from static cone penetration tests.
The above values of E25 apply to a settlement analysis that can be
assumed to behave as linearly elastic media.
Soil Type α = E25 / qt
silt and sand 1.5
compact sand 2.0
dense sand 3.0
sand and gravel 4.0
6
5. CPT Plant
A variety of CPT units are available for deep compaction verification and
compliance testing purposes. Plant type selection should assess whether
wheeled or track mounted units are appropriate for the surface traffic conditions.
Appendix A
Guideline for soils suitable for vibrocompaction techniques
Soil classification for deep compaction based on the Eslami-Fellenius chart
Soil classification for deep compaction based on CPT data
Appendix B
Influence of compressibility on normally consolidated, uncemented, unaged
predominantly quartz sands (after Jamiolkowski et al 1985)
Appendix C
All Lankelma CPT units can deploy the following devices:
Cone penetration testing
Friction cone - cone tip and friction sleeve resistance
Piezocone - cone tip and friction sleeve resistances and porewater pressure
Seismic cone - as the piezocone, but with the measurement of shear wave velocity and hence the small strain shear modulus, Gmax
Soil moisture probe - as the piezocone, but with the additional in-situ water content, temperature and soil conductivity measurement
Environmental probes - a variety of probes are available including fuel fluorescence detection, resistivity, conductivity and temperature
Shear vane equipment - Lankelma can deploy a Geonor penetration shear vane for the assessment of in-situ undrained shear strength
Push full displacement pressuremeter - to assess in-situ soil stiffness
Sampling
Soil sampling - fixed piston MOSTAP samples, thin wall Shelby tubes, push windowless samples
Geotechnical instrumentation
Instruments include - conventional standpipes and standpipe piezometers, vibrating wire piezometers, gas monitoring wells, inclinometers
See our website www.lankelma.com for further details.
Appendix D
Soil parameters and ground types
The applicability and usefulness of in-situ tests
Applicability:
A = high; B = moderate; C = low; - = none
* ф = will depend on soil type
Soil parameter definitions:
u = in-situ static pore pressure
ф’ = effective internal friction angle
su = undrained shear strength
mv = coefficient of compressibility
cv = coefficient of consolidation
k = coefficient of permeability
G0 = shear modulus at small strains
σh = horizontal stress
OCR = overconsolidation ratio
CPT cone penetration testing:
120 – 150m per day
Continuous profile
Soil characterised in-situ
Instantaneous results
Minimal soil disturbance
High quality, repeatable results
Electronic – fast, flexible data transfer
Gro
un
d t
ype
Pea
t
B
A
A
A
A
A
B
Cla
y
B
A
A
A
A
A
A
Silt
B
A
A
A
A
A
-
San
d
A
A
A
A
A
A
-
Gra
vel
B
C
C
- - B
-
Soft
rock
C
C
C
C
C
C
-
Har
d
rock
- - - - - - -
Soil
Par
amet
ers
OC
R
C
C
B
B
B
C
B/C
σh
- C
B/C
B/C
B
- -
Go
C
C
B
B
A
C
-
k - - - B
B
- -
c v
- - - A/B
A/B
- -
mv
- C
C
B
B
- -
S u
C
C
B
B
A/B
C
-
*ф’
C
C
C
B
B
C
A
u
- - - A
A
- -
Pro
file
B
A/B
A
A
A
B
C
Soil
typ
e
C
B
B
A
A
A
B
Pen
etro
met
er
Dyn
amic
Mec
han
ical
Elec
tric
(C
PT)
Pie
zoco
ne
(CP
TU)
Seis
mic
(SC
PT/
SCP
TU)
Stan
dar
d p
en
etra
tio
n t
est
(SP
T)
Van
e t
esti
ng
Appendix E
Two case studies
1. Ground Improvement at Great Yarmouth, UK
The outer harbour, Great Yarmouth, is currently under construction – a project
undertaken by a Van Oord/Bam Nuttall joint venture. With a view to expanding Great
Yarmouth’s port operational capabilities, the outer harbour will service a whole range of
ships including freight ferries and container ships.
1,600,000m3 of dredged sand
The project involves the dredging of 1,600,000m3 of sand from in and around the harbour
to allow the reclamation of around 17 hectares of land.
Currently, dredging and placement of the sand has been completed by Van Oord in the
surrounding areas of the harbour. This material has been hydraulically pumped into areas
surrounding the quay walls to depths of over 12m. Levelling of the reclaimed land started
in late May 2009.
Pre and post compaction
Lankelma’s role in this project is to test the level of pre and post compaction of the placed
material. This will provide the client with an indication of what further works may be
required to minimize settlements to structures that are constructed on the site. The CPT
has proved to be an ideal technique for collecting this form of information. It readily
provides verification and specification compliance of the placed sand, and allows the
rapid identification of any weak zones within the fill that may require further compaction.
Track truck excellence
Testing was carried out by our combination track truck vehicle – UK15. This rig excelled
in this instance; wheeled operations allowed quick mobilization and rapid movements
around staging areas, whilst track deployment of the unit was necessary for traversing the
reclaimed land due to the loose surface sand. The use of both trafficking modes meant
for rapid and safe testing.
2. Ground Improvement at a port in the UAE
Gardline Lankelma carried out CPTs at one of the new major ports that are being
developed in the Gulf region. The port is based in the UAE, with newly reclaimed land
stretching 4km out from the shore
Testing 24/7
Operations were soon increased to 24/7 operations to cope with the high volume of
testing that was needed, and to keep up with the dredging activities. Piezocone tests
were carried out pre and post vibrocompaction, and also to test the strength of the gravel
columns. 7,518m of tests were completed.
Dynamic compaction circa 1629