trizetto provider solutions july 15, 2015 joy king ewing, rhia, ccs, ccds joy king consulting, llc1
TRANSCRIPT
TriZetto Provider SolutionsJuly 15, 2015
Joy King Ewing, RHIA, CCS, CCDS
Joy King Consulting, LLC 1
Reimbursement Physician Profiles Utilization Patterns--SI/IS (InterQual), OBS Severity of Illness Data--includes mortality
& complication rates Provider Profiles & Report Cards Payer/Managed Care Contracts
Ewing/Scott 2
INCREASED SCRUTINY
Joy King Consulting, LLC 3
Bundled Payments—Hospitals & MDs have to share the reimbursement
Condition-Specific Capitation ModelEpisode of Care ModelAccountable Care OrganizationsManaged Care
Joy King Consulting, LLC 4
Increasing Medicare revenue requires a) increasing taxes OR b) taking budgeted govt funds from other programs
SO, cost-cutting is the focus, with◦increased focus on medically unnecessary
procedures and admissions◦Increased recovery of overpayments◦Linking payment to “quality”—severity-
adjusted patient outcomes Other payers following suit
Joy King Consulting, LLC 5
Joy King Consulting, LLC 6
Coders pressured to determine if Clinical Indicators present before coding diagnoses documented by the MD◦ Pneumonia without infiltrate on CXR◦ Sepsis with no documentation showing criteria are
met◦ “acute” episode of chronic conditions documented
without clinical evidence in record (CHF, Resp Failure)
Inadequate documentation in the EMR to provide real clinical support for diagnoses in Progress Notes, Discharge Summaries
Some RACs focusing on high-level E/M codesJoy King Consulting, LLC 7
CHANGES IN REIMBURSEMENT RATES
Joy King Consulting, LLC 8
Hospital-acquired Conditions (HACs) & Core (Quality) measures
Hospital Length of Stay Hospital Costs Patient Safety Indicators (PSI 90) Mortality Rates Readmission Rates Office Visit Costs/# Visits per Patient—
justification for E/M & CPT codes billed These all reflect severity/complexity ranking
Joy King Consulting, LLC 9
Performance profiling Economic credentialing & profiling Disease management profiling Physician billing compliance
Healthcare Purchasers identify efficient MDs by data mining from claims to measure performance relative to established benchmarks
Joy King Consulting, LLC 10
Why is improved clinical documentation important to MDs?
In October 2014, Medicare will start collecting data to modify MD reimbursement
There will be a 2% reduction for every Medicare payment if Medicare considers the MDs costs too high—Value-Based MD Payment Modifier to be phased in 2015-2017
Joy King Consulting, LLC 11
How to factor Quality into the Economic Profiling that is
Occurring
Joy King Consulting, LLC 12
Work Harder (see more patients)
More effectively collect what is billed
Document better, so that it can be accurately translated into codes that reflect severity/complexity—severity profiling will determine future MD reimbursement rates
Joy King Consulting, LLC 13
ICD-10 includes greater specificity to risk adjust data◦ More accurate, meaningful estimates about
what a disease state or procedure costs to treat◦ Includes demographic and social issues
impacting patients’ health
Reimbursement more accurately re-aligned with complexity and costs to treat complex cases
Joy King Consulting, LLC 14
Has it improved documentation??
“What is being diminished or even eliminated is the 100-yr old tradition of narrative that tells the story of the patient’s condition in a manner that is easy to understand and remember. Even long-time MDs have abandoned the clinical narrative & simply click a line or two in the EMR.” Dr. Juan Cueva, Cook County Medical Society
Ewing/Scott 15
Dr. Jonathan Elion, speaker at Clinical Coding Meeting in San Diego believes “cut & paste is NOT a good idea—bad information gets repeated over & over
Two places appropriate for cut & paste: 1) radiology report interpretations pasted into PN, 2) pathology report results pasted into PNNO need to cut & paste from PN to PN
Joy King Consulting, LLC 16
Electronic PN: aside from what meds, test results, lab values cut & pasted—are problems & response to treatment clear?
MDs entering codes in the EMR—is a legal document, wrong codes can be liability risk
MD offices: incorrect diagnoses or codes to hospitals for pre-authorization, medical necessity, approval of tests/services ordered & scheduled
Billing wrong site of service (MD office vs. OP/Ambulatory Surgery Center)
Joy King Consulting, LLC 17
E/M levels may increase due to use of EMR◦ May be due to ease of documenting (templates,
drop-down boxes) Pay attention to drop-downs!◦ Make sure documentation is clinically supported
OIG study on impact of EMR on coding◦ Authentication—OIG did not let reviewers count
anything in the study that was not signed within 48 hrs of the patient’s appointment time
Inaccurate Coding: Some payers are giving MDs bonus points for reimbursement if they employ a certified coder
Joy King Consulting, LLC 18
Documentation should clearly tell the patient’s story—especially in hybrid MR
The Discharge Summary should NOT tell a different story than the Progress notes, Consults, etc. do, e.g. not including resolved diagnoses in Final Diagnoses List
Joy King Consulting, LLC 19
“Should” explain the resources used to treat the patient
Should provide clinical rationale for treatment in the IP setting, as opposed to OBS
Should provide a comprehensive description of the hospital stay
Should include instructions for continued care to relevant care givers
ARE YOUR DISCHARGE SUMMARIES A GOOD INVOICE FOR ALL SERVICES
BILLED?
Joy King Consulting, LLC 20
Must demonstrate the patient’s progress towards treatment goals, or
Demonstrate patient’s findings or changes in condition
Certification of two midnights and IP order alone do NOT guarantee medical necessity
Information within the MR about the patient’s condition—NOT JUST THE DIAGNOSIS—support necessity of IP vs. OP services
Joy King Consulting, LLC 21
Joy King Consulting, LLC 22
Documentation needs to reflect: Disease etiology Acute vs. chronic, acute on chronic Failure vs dysfunction or insufficiency Stages of disease progression of chronic
conditions, e.g. diabetes mellitus linked to complications◦ Document acute manifestations/exacerbations ◦ Document decompensation or debility of chronic
diseases
“due to” or “manifested by”
MDs best insurance policy to demonstrate the quality of their care AND medical necessity:◦ Shows analytical skills◦ Problem-solving skills◦ Complexity of decision-making involved in the
patient’s care #, acuity and severity/duration of problems
addressed through Hx, PE, and medical decisions
Context of the encounter among all other services previously given for the same problem
Joy King Consulting, LLC 23
Based on ICD-9 Dx Code and CPT E/M LevelBronchitis acute 466.0 99221 $ 65.01Bronchitis w/ COPD 491.21 99222 $106.74Bronchitis/COPD/ARF 518.81/491.21 99291 $163.85
E/M Level submitted needs to match the specificity/severity of the ICD-9 Diagnosis submitted—is now impacting reimbursement along with CPT codes
Joy King Consulting, LLC 24
MDs need to be taught Concepts of
Documentation
Joy King Consulting, LLC 25
Sustained & ongoing education Succinct & clinically relevant to them
◦ Not what “should” be documented◦ Individual information on what they are not
documenting◦ Identify documentation issues by provider◦ Provide each with a workable list of their
documentation issues◦ Consider mobile apps that can keep their
documentation issues list updated◦ Include medical necessity, severity/acuity issues
Use PA’s and Service line MD leaders
Joy King Consulting, LLC 26
Contributing Factors to Costs◦ LOS◦ Tests◦ Consultants called◦ Medications—MDs don’t know costs of meds but it
affects their payer scorecards
Mortality Rates◦ If 3 of 10 cases expire (observed mortality) where
documentation only supports 1 of 10 (expected mortality)—their mortality rate is 3x expected
◦ This can be improved JUST by improving quality of documentation, assuming quality of care acceptable
Joy King Consulting, LLC 27
Ewing/Scott 28
I-9
I-10
Increased code specificity requires substantial documentation changes
More robust definitions of severity, comorbidities, complications, sequelae, manifestations, causes, and other parameters that describe the patient’s condition
25% of additional ICD-10-CM codes due to including laterality
25% of additional codes due to distinguishing between “initial” & “subsequent” encounters
Ewing/Scott 29
Inappropriate to select a more specific code that is not supported by documentation
Inappropriate to order medically unnecessary tests to obtain a more specific diagnosis code
Joy King Consulting, LLC 30
OP & Ambulatory SurgeryMAC payments to facilities being aligned to MD payments—if hospital claim denied, MD claim can be alsoPayers refusing to pay for “unspecified” diagnoses given as reason for proceduresWhich MDs have documentation leading to NOS codesDon’t offer NOS, “unspecified sites, etc. as options on templates & check sheets
Joy King Consulting, LLC 31
Unspecified diagnosis codes◦ 80% of codes on claims are secondary diagnoses◦ Emphasize importance of secondary diagnoses in
showing complexity/severity◦ # unspecified codes used in ICD-9 is less than for
ICD-10 Focus on additional documents needed for
ICD-10 specificity◦ Radiology reports Vent sheets◦ Medication records therapy notes◦ Transfusion records dialysis notes
Joy King Consulting, LLC 32
For both ICD-9 and ICD-10Accurate reflection of acuity & severity of illnessSeverity of illness should match intensity of services provided and vice versaAccurate justification for resources consumedAccurate reflection of factors used to measure MD efficiency, outcomes, risk adjustment, quality, and costs of care
Joy King Consulting, LLC 33
Should be documented if they are evaluated, monitored, treated or affect your treatment plan, e.g. Syncope or Chest pain
BUT Should not be used as a final diagnosis
unless no definitive cause is found
Joy King Consulting, LLC 34
Document Comorbidities, e.g. Diabetes Mellitus, Type II, Severe Malnutrition, etc.
Any condition that affects patient care in any one of five ways:◦ Clinical Evaluation◦ Diagnostic Evaluation◦ Therapeutic intervention◦ Increased level on monitoring◦ Disposition
Secondary Diagnoses may raise the DRG Severity Level if documented to appropriate degree of specificity.
Joy King Consulting, LLC 35
Do not use Fever of Unknown Origin. If treated with antibiotics and it resolves, use suspected cause at discharge, e.g. “Possible ___ Infection”. List specific type, etc.◦Probable Sepsis◦Probable Mixed Bacterial Pneumonia◦Possible Gram-negative Pneumonia◦Probable Aspiration Pneumonia
Document what you have been treating as the likely problem
Joy King Consulting, LLC 36
Patient admitted for major bowel procedure. Patient had secondary dx of CHF. Actual LOS 9 days
As documented, stay grouped to DRG 331 Major bowel proced w/o MCC/CC
GMLOS 4.8 days
If MD documented chronic diastolic heart failure (CC), groups to DRG 330 GMLOS 7.8 days
If MD documented acute on chronic diastolic heart failure, groups to DRG 329 GMLOS 12.5 days
Ewing/Scott 37
Principal Diagnosis
Colitis
Secondary Diagnosis AnemiaAKICKD, Unspecified
DRG 392 w/o MCCSOI/ROM: 2/1
DRG r.w. 0.7375LOS 2.8 days
Joy King Consulting, LLC 38
Adm for COPD exacerbation w/ acute bronchitis. Stools occult +; EGD confirmed gastritis.
PDX: COPD exacerbationSecondary Dx: GastritisMS DRG 192 COPD w/o CC/MCC r.w. 0.7072
$3,690 2.9 LOS
Secondary Dx: Gastritis, GI bleedMS DRG 191 COPD w/ CC r.w. 0.9521
$4,967 3.6 LOSSecondary Dx: GI bleed due to gastritisMS DRG 190 COPD w/ MCC r.w. 1.1860
$6,183 4.3 LOS
Joy King Consulting, LLC 39
Problematic Clinical Diagnoses:◦ CHF (systolic vs. diastolic)—unspecif doesn’t
show exacerb◦ Sepsis/SIRS (severe, organ failures linked)◦ DM (manifestations/complications, Type I or II)◦ Acute Kidney Disease specificity◦ Chronic Kidney Disease (stages)◦ Pneumonia (link to organism or aspiration)◦ CAD (chest pain vs. angina vs. CAD)◦ Decubitus ulcers vs. Other ulcers (stage, POA)◦ GI bleed linked to GI cause◦ Malnutrition or Obesity (severity)
Joy King Consulting, LLC 40
Pneumonia
Urosepsis Bacteremia MODS or Sepsis
Syndrome Diabetes Anemia Malnutrition
AMS or delirium
Aspiration Pneumonia, Probable Gram – Pneumonia
Sepsis due to UTI Sepsis Severe sepsis w/ Resp failure
& Acute Kidney Failure Type 2 DM w/ PVD & ulcer Acute blood loss anemia Severe protein-calorie
malnutrition Metabolic Encephalopathy
Joy King Consulting, LLC 41
Diagnosis Specificity Needed Respiratory Failure Acute, w/ hypoxia or
hypercapnia Asthma Severity Level of Asthma Myocardial Infarction Coronary artery involved Stroke/CVA Specific artery involved Aftercare following injury Specific injury Injuries Specific site & laterality Open Fractures Gustilo open fracture scale
Joy King Consulting, LLC 42
Document the clinical evidence and documentation in the chart for AKI
“Do you feel the patient has AKI?”◦ ____Yes◦ ____No◦ ____Clinically unable to determine (provide the
criteria for AKI on the query since MDs often don’t know the criteria
Joy King Consulting, LLC 43
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Section
Body System
Root Operation Approach
Device
Qualifier
Body Part/Region
Ewing/Scott 44
One ICD-9-CM procedure code = multiple ICD-10-PCS codes
Additional specificity required:◦ Specific information on devices—most
frequently missing piece of information◦Surgical approaches clearly documented◦Specific anatomical sites involved 2nd most frequently missing element Will impact CC/MCC status of code,
e.g. part of foot in an amputations
Joy King Consulting, LLC 45
There are no “unspecified” procedure codes
Specificity to fully assign each character of the code = more frequent queries
Requires Very Specific Body Part Requires Laterality Requires Specific Approach Requires Specific Type of Contrast Material Requires Specific Procedures performed which
have been defined by “eponyms” in ICD-9 (Whipple procedure)
46Joy King Consulting, LLC
“In times of rapid change, experience could be your worst enemy” (J Paul Getty)
“No problem is too big or so complicated that it cannot be run away from!” (Charlie Brown)
Joy King Consulting, LLC 47
Contact Information:
Joy King Consulting, [email protected]
(205) 612-4471
Joy King Consulting, LLC 48