thurs 1 lundy

Upload: muhammad-irsyad

Post on 20-Feb-2018

223 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/24/2019 Thurs 1 Lundy

    1/47

    8/19/14

    1

    BOOM!!!!

    Orthopaedic Trauma

    Douglas W. Lundy, MD, MBA, FACS31 July 2014

    Orthopaedic Trauma SurgeryResurgens Orthopaedics

    Atlanta, Georgia

    Conflict

    Consultant for

    Synthes

    Orthopaedics.

    Board of Directors of

    the OTA, GOS, ABOS

    and Resurgens

    Orthopaedics.

    AAOSCommunications

    Cabinet Liaison to the

    Council on Advocacy.

  • 7/24/2019 Thurs 1 Lundy

    2/47

    8/19/14

    2

    Outcomes

    Comparative study

    concerning outcomesafter major fracture.

    Surgeons more

    satisfied with

    outcomes than the

    patients were. Harris IA, Dao AT, Young JM,

    Solomon MJ, Jalaludin BB:Predictors of patient and surgeon

    satisfaction after orthopaedic

    trauma. Injury40:377-384, 2009.

    SF-36

    Multi-purpose, short

    health survey.

    36 questions.

    Made available in

    standard form in1990.

    Cited in 4000

    publications.

    Scales:

    Physical Functioning

    Role-Physical

    Bodily Pain

    General Health

    Vitality

    Social Functioning

    Role-Emotional Mental Health

  • 7/24/2019 Thurs 1 Lundy

    3/47

    8/19/14

    3

    Trauma patients with fractures

    SF-36 scores: Bodily pain, Physical function,

    Role-physical, Mental health,Role-emotional, Social function(p < 0.05).

    Patients withorthopaedic injuries haverelatively worsefunctional recovery thantrauma patients without

    orthopaedic injuries, andthis worsens with time. Michaels AJ, Madey SM, Krieg JC, Long WB:

    Traditional injury scoring underestimates therelative consequences of orthopedic injury. JTrauma. 2001 Mar;50(3):389-395.

    Psychological effects

    Psychological distress isstrongly associated withpatient outcome--includingfunctional outcome--following trauma.

    Psychological distress aftertrauma, with its large impacton trauma outcomes,

    remains a substantialproblem that is usuallyignored and untreated. Starr AJ: Fracture repair: successful advances, persistent

    problems, and the psychological burden of t rauma. J BoneJoint Surg Am. 2008 Feb;90 Suppl 1:132-7

  • 7/24/2019 Thurs 1 Lundy

    4/47

    8/19/14

    4

    The Big Bad Five

    Tibial plafond

    Talar neck

    Calcaneus

    Unstable pelvis

    Femoral neck

    in young people

    High mechanism injuries Falls

    MVC

  • 7/24/2019 Thurs 1 Lundy

    5/47

    8/19/14

    5

    Tibial Plafond Fractures

    Plafond = roof.

    Difficult surgery.

    Prolonged recovery.

    Nonunion and pain is

    common.

    Takes up to two years

    to see what the

    outcome will be.

    Tibial plafond outcomes Tibial plafond

    fractures are difficultto manage and mayhave seriouscomplications.

    Loss of function andprogression to post-traumatic arthritis are

    common after tibialplafond fractures. Harris AM, Patterson BM, Sontich JK, Vallier

    HA: Results and outcomes after operativetreatment of high-energy tibial plafondfractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2006 Apr;27(4):256-265.

  • 7/24/2019 Thurs 1 Lundy

    6/47

    8/19/14

    6

    Talar neck fractures

    Difficult surgery.

    Prolongedhealing.

    Nonunion andavascularnecrosis is ahuge problem.

    May need

    pantalar fusion inthe future.

    Talar fracture outcome

    Osteonecrosis 49%: Collapse of the dome in 31%.

    54% had posttraumatic arthritis comminuted fractures (p < 0.07)

    open fractures (p = 0.09).

    Fractures of the talar neck are associated withhigh rates of morbidity and complications.

    Vallier HA, Nork SE, Barei DP, Benirschke SK, Sangeorzan BJ: Talar neck fractures:results and outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Aug;86-A(8):1616-1624.

  • 7/24/2019 Thurs 1 Lundy

    7/47

    8/19/14

    7

    Calcaneal fractures

    People

    who fall:

    Roofers

    Dry

    wallers

    Framers

    Painters

    Calcaneal fractures

    Most painful fracture

    that there is!

    Pain and difficulty

    walking on uneven

    ground.

    Wound issues after

    surgery.

    May need a subtalar

    fusion.

  • 7/24/2019 Thurs 1 Lundy

    8/47

    8/19/14

    8

    Cost of injury Calcaneal fractures

    have beenrecognized as havingrelatively poor clinicaloutcomes and amajor socioeconomicimpact with regard totime lost from work

    and recreation. Brauer CA, Manns BJ, Ko M, Donaldson C,Buckley R: An economic evaluation ofoperative compared with nonoperativemanagement of displaced intra-articularcalcaneal fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am.2005 Dec;87(12):2741-2749.

    Wound Complications Smoking, diabetes,

    and open fracturesall increase the riskof woundcomplication aftersurgicalstabilization ofcalcaneus

    fractures. Folk JW, Starr AJ, Early JS: Earlywound complications of operativetreatment of calcaneus fractures:analysis of 190 fractures. J OrthopTrauma.1999 Jun-Jul;13(5):369-372.

  • 7/24/2019 Thurs 1 Lundy

    9/47

    8/19/14

    9

    Fracture Blisters All blisters were unroofed, and

    antibiotic cream (Silvadene)

    was applied twice daily until theblister bed had re-epithelialized.

    We urge caution when

    planning to make a surgical

    incision around fractureblisters in diabetic patients

    because the zone of injury

    might extend beyond theborders of the fracture blister. Strauss EJ, Petrucelli G, Bong M, Koval KJ, Egol

    JA: Blisters associated with lower-extremity

    fracture: results of a prospective treatmentprotocol. J Orthop Trauma. 2006 Oct;20(9):

    618-622.

    Open Tibial Fractures

  • 7/24/2019 Thurs 1 Lundy

    10/47

    8/19/14

    10

    Definitions

    Fracture: a soft tissueinjuryoverlying abroken bone.

    Soft tissue trauma is the more important

    injury. Norris BL and Kellam JF: Soft-tissue injuries associated with

    high-energy extremity trauma: Principles of management. J.Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg.5:37-46, 1997.

    Open fracture: any fracture associated

    with a laceration or puncture wound on thesame limb segment.

    Gustilo and Anderson ClassificationType Description Infection Antibiotics

    I Clean, 1 cm, minimal

    soft tissue injury

    2% to 7% Ancef and

    Gentamycin

    III Extensive injury,

    segmental fx,

    GSW, farm injury,

    etc.

    10% to 25% Above + PCN

    Gustilo RB, Anderson JT: Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures oflong bones: retrospective and prospective analyses. J. Bone Joint Surg.58-A:453-458, 1976.

  • 7/24/2019 Thurs 1 Lundy

    11/47

    8/19/14

    11

    Gustilo Classification

    Gustilo RB, Mendoza RM, Williams DN: Problems in the management of type III (severe) open

    fractures: a new classification of type III open fractures. J. Trauma24:742-746, 1984.

    Type I

  • 7/24/2019 Thurs 1 Lundy

    12/47

    8/19/14

    12

    Definitely IIIC

    Type II or IIIA?

  • 7/24/2019 Thurs 1 Lundy

    13/47

    8/19/14

    13

    Type II or IIIA?

    Antibiotics

    A prospective double-blind randomized clinicaltrial comparing ciprofloxacin and cefamandole/gentamicin. No difference in Type I or II open fracture wounds. High failure rate for the ciprofloxacin Type III open

    fracture group, with patients being 5.33 times morelikely to become infected than those in thecombination therapy group.

    Single-agent antibiotic therapy with ciprofloxacinis effective in treatment of Type I and Type II

    open fracture wounds. Patzakis MJ, Bains RS, Lee J, Shepherd L, Singer G, Ressler R, Harvey F, Holtom P.: Prospective,randomized, double-blind study comparing single-agent antibiotic therapy, ciprofloxacin, to combinationantibiotic therapy in open fracture wounds. J Orthop Trauma. 2000 Nov;14(8):529-533.

  • 7/24/2019 Thurs 1 Lundy

    14/47

    8/19/14

    14

    LEAP!

    LEAP Study 527 patients in this multi-centered study.

    Bone loss was least significant variabledetermining limb salvage.

    Soft tissue injury severity has the greatestimpact on decision making regarding limbsalvage versus amputation. MacKenzie EJ, Bosse MJ, Kellam JF, Burgess AR, Webb LX, Swiontkowski MF,

    Sanders R, Jones AL, McAndrew MP, Patterson B, McCarthy ML, Rohde CA,LEAP Study Group: Factors influencing the decision to amputate or reconstruct

    after high-energy lower extremity trauma. J Trauma. 2002 Apr;52(4):641-649.

  • 7/24/2019 Thurs 1 Lundy

    15/47

    8/19/14

    15

    LEAP at seven years

    397 - amputation orreconstruction.

    Physical andpsychosocialfunctioningdeteriorated between24 to 84 months afterthe injury. MacKenzie EJ, Bosse MJ, Pollak AN, Webb

    LX, Swiontkowski MF, Kellam JF, Smith DG,Sanders RW, Jones AL, Starr AJ, McAndrewMP, Patterson BM, Burgess AR, Castillo RC:Long-term persistence of disability following

    severe lower-limb trauma. Results of a seven-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005Aug;87(8):1801-1809.

    Poor outcome:

    older age

    female gender

    lower education level

    living in a poor household

    current or previoussmoking

    low self-efficacy

    poor self-reported healthstatus before the injury

    involvement with the legalsystem in an effort toobtain disability payments.

    LEAP at seven years reconstruction for the

    treatment of injuries belowthe distal part of the femurtypically results in functionaloutcomes equivalent tothose of amputation.

    Regardless of the treatmentoption, however, long-term

    functional outcomes arepoor. MacKenzie EJ, Bosse MJ, Pollak AN, Webb LX, Swiontkowski MF,

    Kellam JF, Smith DG, Sanders RW, Jones AL, Starr AJ, McAndrewMP, Patterson BM, Burgess AR, Castillo RC: Long-term persistenceof disability following severe lower-limb trauma. Results of a seven-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Aug;87(8):1801-1809.

  • 7/24/2019 Thurs 1 Lundy

    16/47

    8/19/14

    16

    Poor outcomes in severe trauma

    LEAP showed that at twoyears, most patients had pooroutcomes, with only half of thepatients returning to work.

    By seven years, half of thepatients continued to reportappreciable disability.

    more than half of thepatients who were managed

    with the current standard ofcare had treatment failure.

    Starr AJ: Fracture repair: successful advances, persistent problems, and thepsychological burden of trauma. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Feb;90 Suppl1:132-7

    The joys of call

    Hey doc, sorry to call

    you at 2:30 AM. I

    have a really bad

    open xxx fracture

    here in the ER

    xxx =

    Tibial

    Femoral

    Pelvic

  • 7/24/2019 Thurs 1 Lundy

    17/47

    8/19/14

    17

    So what is acceptable?

    Is it standard of

    care to operate

    this fracture at

    2:30 AM or

    should (can) I

    wait until

    morning?

    Timing of debridement

    LEAP found that time

    from injury to surgicaldebridement was not

    contributory factor ofinfection.

    Timing from injury to

    the definitive

    treatment center wasindicative of infection.

  • 7/24/2019 Thurs 1 Lundy

    18/47

    8/19/14

    18

    Timing of debridement

    Findings should not

    be interpreted as anargument that

    operativedebridement of open

    fractures should not

    be accomplishedurgently. Pollak AN, Jones AL, Castillo RC, Bosse MJ,

    MacKenzie RJ, LEAP study group: Therelationship between time and surgical

    debridement and incidence of infection afteropen high-energy lower extremity trauma. J

    Bone Joint Surg92-A:7-15, 2010.

    Ex-fix vs. nail? External fixator had

    more surgicalprocedures, took longerto achieve full weight-bearing status, and hadmore readmissions thandid those treated with anintramedullary nail. Webb LX, Bosse MJ, Castillo RC,

    MacKenzie EJ, LEAP Study Group: Analysisof surgeon-controlled variables in thetreatment of limb-threatening type-III opentibial diaphyseal fractures. J Bone Joint Surg

    Am. 2007 May;89(5):923-928.

  • 7/24/2019 Thurs 1 Lundy

    19/47

    8/19/14

    19

    Smoking

    Patients with unilateralopen tibia fractures weredivided into 3 baselinesmoking categories:never smoked, previoussmoker and currentsmoker.

    Smokers 37% less likelyto heal.

    Previous smokers were32% less likely to heal. Castillo RC, Bosse MJ, MacKenzie EJ,

    Patterson BM, LEAP Study Group: Impact ofsmoking on fracture healing and risk ofcomplications in limb-threatening open tibiafractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2005 Mar;19(3):151-157.

    Smoking Current smokers twice as

    likely to develop an infection(P = 0.05) and 3.7 times aslikely to developosteomyelitis (P = 0.01).

    Smoking places the patientat risk for increased time tounion and complications.Previous smoking historyalso appears to increase therisk of osteomyelitis andincreased time to union. Castillo RC, Bosse MJ, MacKenzie EJ,

    Patterson BM, LEAP Study Group: Impact ofsmoking on fracture healing and risk ofcomplications in limb-threatening open tibiafractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2005 Mar;19(3):151-157.

  • 7/24/2019 Thurs 1 Lundy

    20/47

    8/19/14

    20

    Return to work

    37 type III high-energy open

    tibial shaft fractures.

    (76%) returned to work.

    64% returned to work at asimilar level of manual labor.

    Average delay between injuryand return to work was 11

    months (range, 3-18 months).

    89% reported one or more

    subjective complaints. Arangio GA, Lehr S, Reed JF 3rd: Reemployment of patients with

    surgical salvage of open, high-energy tibial fractures: an outcomestudy. J Trauma. 1997 May;42(5):942-945.

    There are no emergencies in

    orthopaedic trauma

    Femoral neck fractures

    Talar neck fractures

    Open fractures

    Open book pelvic

    fractures

    Unreduced dislocations

    Compartmentsyndrome

  • 7/24/2019 Thurs 1 Lundy

    21/47

    8/19/14

    21

    Rule #1 - Timing is everything

    Compartment syndrome (CS) isan emergency/

    urgency to save limb and possibly life.

    #2 - Compartment syndrome is rare

    Incidence is

    3.1/100,000 persons

    Incidence for men: 7.3

    per 100,000.

    Incidence for women:0.7 per 100,000.

    McQueen MM, Gaston P, Court-BrownCM: Acute compartment syndrome:

    Who is at risk?. J Bone Joint Surg 82-B, 200-203, 2000.

  • 7/24/2019 Thurs 1 Lundy

    22/47

    8/19/14

    22

    Incidence

    1.5% McQueen MM, Christie J, Court-Brown CM.: Compartment pressures after intramedullary

    nailing of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990 May;72(3):395-397.

    7% Kutty S, Farooq M, Murphy D, Kelliher C, Condon F, McElwain JP.: Tibial shaft fractures

    treated with the AO unreamed tibial nail. Ir J Med Sci.2003 Jul-Sep;172(3):141-142.

    14.5% Barei DP, Nork SE, Mills WJ, Henley MB, Benirschke SK.: Complications associated with

    internal fixation of high-energy bicondylar tibial plateau fractures utilizing a two-incisiontechnique. J Orthop Trauma. 2004 Nov-Dec;18(10):649-657.

    29% Ovre S, Hvaal K, Holm I, Stromsoe K, Nordsletten L, Skjeldal S.: Compartment pressure innailed tibial fractures. A threshold of 30 mmHg for decompression gives 29% fasciotomies.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1998;118(1-2):29-31.

    Causes

    Increase the contents

    of the compartment.

    Decrease the fascial

    volume of the

    compartment.

    Metabolic insults that

    disrupt the

    microvasculature.

  • 7/24/2019 Thurs 1 Lundy

    23/47

    8/19/14

    23

    #3 - Young people get CS more often

    Is a patient younger

    than 35 with a tibialfracture more likely to

    have a CS than apatient over 35 years

    of age?

    3 times!

    #4 - He cant have a CS he can

    still move his toes!

    The six dreaded Ps:

    Paralysis

    Pallor

    Pulselessness

    Pressure

    Paresthesia

    Pain out of proportion

    What exactly is painout of proportion?

  • 7/24/2019 Thurs 1 Lundy

    24/47

    8/19/14

    24

    Pain out of proportion

    Pain is highly

    subjective.

    To know what pain is

    proportional, one would

    have to know how

    much pain a certain

    injury produces.

    As a CS progresses,

    pain may actually

    decrease masking theCS.

    #5 Pressure measurements are

    the best way to diagnose CS

    Whitesides method.

    STIC monitors.

    Arterial pressure

    monitor.

    Accurately measures

    pressure in thecompartment.

  • 7/24/2019 Thurs 1 Lundy

    25/47

    8/19/14

    25

    Continuous monitoring

    One group with continuous monitoringcompared with control clinical group.

    In monitored group, 18% had !p< 30 mm Hg,but none developed compartment syndrome.

    Overall compartment syndrome incidence was2.5%.

    Continuous monitoring is not indicated in alert

    patients. Harris IA, Kadir A, Donald G: Continuous compartment pressure monitoring for tibiafractures: Does it influence outcome? J. Trauma60:1330-1335, 2006.

    Traumatic measurements

    84% had at least one measurement within 30mm !p, and 58% had at least onemeasurement within 20 mm !p.

    None of the patients ever manifested acompartment syndrome.

    Quantitative measurements may not accuratelydiagnose compartment syndrome.

    Prayson MJ, Chen JL, Hampers D, Vogt M, Fenwick J, Meredick R: Baseline compartmentpressure measurements in isolated lower extremity fractures without clinical compartmentsyndrome. J. Trauma60:1037-1040, 2006.

  • 7/24/2019 Thurs 1 Lundy

    26/47

    8/19/14

    26

    Pressure measurements are the best way to

    diagnose CS

    Clinical exam is key!

    Clinical assessment

    is still the diagnostic

    cornerstone of ACS

    (acute compartment

    syndrome). Shadgan B, et al: Diagnostic

    techniques in acute compartment

    syndrome of leg J Orthop Trauma

    22:581-587, 2008.

    Meta-analysis The positive predictivevalue of the clinicalfindings was 11% to 15%,and the specificity andnegative predictive valuewere each 97% to 98%.

    The clinical features ofcompartment syndromeare more useful by theirabsence in excluding the

    diagnosisthan they arewhen present in confirmingthe diagnosis. Ulmer T.: The clinical diagnosis of

    compartment syndrome of the lower leg:are clinical findings predictive of thedisorder? J Orthop Trauma. 2002 Sep;

    16(8):572-577.

  • 7/24/2019 Thurs 1 Lundy

    27/47

    8/19/14

    27

    What about the asensate or

    head injured patients?

    Close monitoring of

    clinical exam:

    Firmness

    High clinical suspicion

    Pulses

    Release the

    compartments if in

    doubt.

    #6 - To calculate !p, use the intra-

    operative DBP

    Mean DBP in surgery

    was 18mm Hg less

    than pre-operative

    DBP.

    Intra-operative DBP

    may be spuriously low

    when for deciding to

    do a fasciotomy. Kakar S, Firoozabadi R, McKean J,

    Tornetta P: Diastolic blood pressure inpatients with tibia fractures under

    anaesthesia: implications for the

    diagnosis of compartment syndrome. J.

    Orthop. Trauma21: 99-103, 2007.

  • 7/24/2019 Thurs 1 Lundy

    28/47

    8/19/14

    28

    #7 - Open fractures cant have

    compartment syndrome

    The tears in the fascia release the compartment

    pressure

    CS in open fractures

    The incidence of

    compartment syndrome

    was found to be directly

    proportional to the degree

    of injury to soft tissue and

    bone; this complication

    occurred most often in

    association with a

    comminuted, type-IIIopen injury to a

    pedestrian. Blick SS, Brumback RJ, Poka A, Burgess

    AR, Ebraheim NA.: Compartment

    syndrome in open tibial fractures. J Bone

    Joint Surg Am. 1986 Dec;68(9):1348-1353.

  • 7/24/2019 Thurs 1 Lundy

    29/47

    8/19/14

    29

    #8 - I can tell by the firmness

    Well orthopaedic

    residents cant!

    Positive predictive

    value was 70%

    Negative predictive

    value was 63%. Shuler FD, Dietz MJ: Physicians'

    ability to manually detect isolated

    elevations in leg intracompartmental

    pressure J Bone Joint Surg 92-A;

    361-367, 2010.

    One incision or two?

  • 7/24/2019 Thurs 1 Lundy

    30/47

    8/19/14

    30

    Single incision fasciotomy

    Centered over fibula.

    Superficial dissection can access anterior, lateral

    and superficial posterior compartments.

    Dissect posterior to fibula and release deep

    compartment.

    Post-fasciotomy care

    NPWT for several days to a week.

    Often dictated by fracture care.

    Often require STSG.

  • 7/24/2019 Thurs 1 Lundy

    31/47

    8/19/14

    31

    #9 - I missed it Im in trouble!

    Liability Increasing time from theonset of symptoms to the

    fasciotomy was associatedwith an increased

    indemnity payment (p