the symmetry of wallpaper - university of minnesotadavidm/docs/symmetry-of-wallpaper.pdf · david...
TRANSCRIPT
The symmetry of wallpaper
David Morawski
University of Minnesota
Math Club, University of Minnesota25 March, 2011
“Symmetry is everywhere”
In art:
The Alhambra, Spain
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 2 / 35
“Symmetry is everywhere”
In architecture:
Apartment building, Berkeley, CA
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 3 / 35
“Symmetry is everywhere”
In nature:
A fine looking cactus.David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 4 / 35
“Symmetry is everywhere”
And so on. . .
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 5 / 35
Types of transformations
What symmetries do you see?
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 6 / 35
Types of transformations: reflection
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 7 / 35
Types of transformations: reflection
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 7 / 35
Types of transformations: reflection
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 7 / 35
Identical patterns
These patterns are equivalent:
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 8 / 35
Identical patterns
These patterns are equivalent:
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 8 / 35
Identical patterns
These patterns are equivalent:
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 8 / 35
Notation: reflections (*)
This pattern is denoted by the signature *632.
* denotes a reflection.
Order of numbers does not matter: *632 = *326 = *263 = . . .
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 9 / 35
Notation: reflections (*)
This pattern is denoted by the signature *632.
* denotes a reflection.
Order of numbers does not matter: *632 = *326 = *263 = . . .
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 9 / 35
Notation: reflections (*)
This pattern is denoted by the signature *632.
* denotes a reflection.
Order of numbers does not matter: *632 = *326 = *263 = . . .
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 9 / 35
Notation: reflections (*)
This pattern is denoted by the signature *632.
* denotes a reflection.
Order of numbers does not matter: *632 = *326 = *263 = . . .
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 9 / 35
Another pattern
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 10 / 35
Notation: rotations
This pattern has signature 3*3.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 11 / 35
Notation: rotations
This pattern has signature 3*3.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 11 / 35
Notation: rotations
This pattern has signature 3*3.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 11 / 35
Notation: rotations
This pattern has signature 3*3.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 11 / 35
Another example
This pattern has signature 333.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 12 / 35
Another example
This pattern has signature 333.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 12 / 35
Another example
This pattern has signature 333.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 12 / 35
Another example: two reflections?
This pattern has signature **.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 13 / 35
Another example: two reflections?
This pattern has signature **.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 13 / 35
Another example: two reflections?
This pattern has signature **.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 13 / 35
Similar, but different. . .
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 14 / 35
Similar, but different. . .
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 14 / 35
Similar, but different. . .
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 14 / 35
Notation: glide reflection (x)
This pattern has signature *x.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 15 / 35
Notation: glide reflection (x)
This pattern has signature *x.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 15 / 35
Notation: glide reflection (x)
This pattern has signature *x.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 15 / 35
Another glide reflection example
This pattern has signature xx.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 16 / 35
Another glide reflection example
This pattern has signature xx.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 16 / 35
Another glide reflection example
This pattern has signature xx.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 16 / 35
What type of transformations are seen in this pattern?
This pattern has signature o (the “empty transformation”).
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 17 / 35
What type of transformations are seen in this pattern?
This pattern has signature o (the “empty transformation”).
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 17 / 35
The four fundamental transformations (1/2)
Figure: Reflection (*ABC. . . D)
Figure: Rotation (ABC. . . D)
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 18 / 35
The four fundamental transformations (1/2)
Figure: Reflection (*ABC. . . D)
Figure: Rotation (ABC. . . D)
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 18 / 35
The four fundamental transformations (2/3)
Figure: Glide reflection (x)
Figure: Translation (o)
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 19 / 35
The four fundamental transformations (2/3)
Figure: Glide reflection (x)
Figure: Translation (o)
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 19 / 35
The four fundamental transformations (3/3)
These four transformations are called isometries.
An isometry is a transformation of the plane that preserves distance.
These four isometries are the only isometries of the Euclidean plane.
Thus, they are the only transformations of our wallpaper patterns we need toand can consider.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 20 / 35
The four fundamental transformations (3/3)
These four transformations are called isometries.
An isometry is a transformation of the plane that preserves distance.
These four isometries are the only isometries of the Euclidean plane.
Thus, they are the only transformations of our wallpaper patterns we need toand can consider.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 20 / 35
The four fundamental transformations (3/3)
These four transformations are called isometries.
An isometry is a transformation of the plane that preserves distance.
These four isometries are the only isometries of the Euclidean plane.
Thus, they are the only transformations of our wallpaper patterns we need toand can consider.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 20 / 35
The four fundamental transformations (3/3)
These four transformations are called isometries.
An isometry is a transformation of the plane that preserves distance.
These four isometries are the only isometries of the Euclidean plane.
Thus, they are the only transformations of our wallpaper patterns we need toand can consider.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 20 / 35
Assigning costs to symbols. . .
Symbol Cost ($)o 22 1
23 2
34 3
4...
...N N−1
N
Symbol Cost ($)* or x 12 1
43 1
34 3
8...
...N N−1
2N
*632 costs $1 + 512 + 1
3 + 14 = $2.
3*3 costs $ 23 + 1 + 1
3 = $2.
** costs $1 + 1 = $2.
*x costs $1 + 1 = $2.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 21 / 35
Assigning costs to symbols. . .
Symbol Cost ($)o 22 1
23 2
34 3
4...
...N N−1
N
Symbol Cost ($)* or x 12 1
43 1
34 3
8...
...N N−1
2N
*632 costs $1 + 512 + 1
3 + 14 = $2.
3*3 costs $ 23 + 1 + 1
3 = $2.
** costs $1 + 1 = $2.
*x costs $1 + 1 = $2.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 21 / 35
Assigning costs to symbols. . .
Symbol Cost ($)o 22 1
23 2
34 3
4...
...N N−1
N
Symbol Cost ($)* or x 12 1
43 1
34 3
8...
...N N−1
2N
*632 costs $1 + 512 + 1
3 + 14 = $2.
3*3 costs $ 23 + 1 + 1
3 = $2.
** costs $1 + 1 = $2.
*x costs $1 + 1 = $2.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 21 / 35
Assigning costs to symbols. . .
Symbol Cost ($)o 22 1
23 2
34 3
4...
...N N−1
N
Symbol Cost ($)* or x 12 1
43 1
34 3
8...
...N N−1
2N
*632 costs $1 + 512 + 1
3 + 14 = $2.
3*3 costs $ 23 + 1 + 1
3 = $2.
** costs $1 + 1 = $2.
*x costs $1 + 1 = $2.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 21 / 35
Assigning costs to symbols. . .
Symbol Cost ($)o 22 1
23 2
34 3
4...
...N N−1
N
Symbol Cost ($)* or x 12 1
43 1
34 3
8...
...N N−1
2N
*632 costs $1 + 512 + 1
3 + 14 = $2.
3*3 costs $ 23 + 1 + 1
3 = $2.
** costs $1 + 1 = $2.
*x costs $1 + 1 = $2.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 21 / 35
The $2 Theorem
Theorem
The signatures of plane repeating patterns are precisely those with total cost $2.
A consequence of this is that there are precisely 17 distinct wallpaperpatterns.
This theorem will help us determine the signature of a pattern:
If we have yet to reach $2, we need to find more transformations.
When our signatures total to $2, we have found the pattern’s signature!
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 22 / 35
The $2 Theorem
Theorem
The signatures of plane repeating patterns are precisely those with total cost $2.
A consequence of this is that there are precisely 17 distinct wallpaperpatterns.
This theorem will help us determine the signature of a pattern:
If we have yet to reach $2, we need to find more transformations.
When our signatures total to $2, we have found the pattern’s signature!
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 22 / 35
The $2 Theorem
Theorem
The signatures of plane repeating patterns are precisely those with total cost $2.
A consequence of this is that there are precisely 17 distinct wallpaperpatterns.
This theorem will help us determine the signature of a pattern:
If we have yet to reach $2, we need to find more transformations.
When our signatures total to $2, we have found the pattern’s signature!
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 22 / 35
The $2 Theorem
Theorem
The signatures of plane repeating patterns are precisely those with total cost $2.
A consequence of this is that there are precisely 17 distinct wallpaperpatterns.
This theorem will help us determine the signature of a pattern:
If we have yet to reach $2, we need to find more transformations.
When our signatures total to $2, we have found the pattern’s signature!
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 22 / 35
The $2 Theorem
Theorem
The signatures of plane repeating patterns are precisely those with total cost $2.
A consequence of this is that there are precisely 17 distinct wallpaperpatterns.
This theorem will help us determine the signature of a pattern:
If we have yet to reach $2, we need to find more transformations.
When our signatures total to $2, we have found the pattern’s signature!
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 22 / 35
The $2 Theorem
Theorem
The signatures of plane repeating patterns are precisely those with total cost $2.
A consequence of this is that there are precisely 17 distinct wallpaperpatterns.
This theorem will help us determine the signature of a pattern:
If we have yet to reach $2, we need to find more transformations.
When our signatures total to $2, we have found the pattern’s signature!
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 22 / 35
Identifying signatures
1 First mark any reflections.
2 Then find rotations.
3 Are there any glide reflections? These should also be distinct fromreflections.
4 If you’ve found none of the above, there must only be a translation!
Remember. . .
1 Rotation points should not lie on reflection lines.
2 Glide reflections should not cross reflection lines.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 23 / 35
Identifying signatures
1 First mark any reflections.
2 Then find rotations.
3 Are there any glide reflections? These should also be distinct fromreflections.
4 If you’ve found none of the above, there must only be a translation!
Remember. . .
1 Rotation points should not lie on reflection lines.
2 Glide reflections should not cross reflection lines.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 23 / 35
Identifying signatures
1 First mark any reflections.
2 Then find rotations.
3 Are there any glide reflections? These should also be distinct fromreflections.
4 If you’ve found none of the above, there must only be a translation!
Remember. . .
1 Rotation points should not lie on reflection lines.
2 Glide reflections should not cross reflection lines.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 23 / 35
Identifying signatures
1 First mark any reflections.
2 Then find rotations.
3 Are there any glide reflections? These should also be distinct fromreflections.
4 If you’ve found none of the above, there must only be a translation!
Remember. . .
1 Rotation points should not lie on reflection lines.
2 Glide reflections should not cross reflection lines.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 23 / 35
Identifying signatures
1 First mark any reflections.
2 Then find rotations.
3 Are there any glide reflections? These should also be distinct fromreflections.
4 If you’ve found none of the above, there must only be a translation!
Remember. . .
1 Rotation points should not lie on reflection lines.
2 Glide reflections should not cross reflection lines.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 23 / 35
Identifying signatures
1 First mark any reflections.
2 Then find rotations.
3 Are there any glide reflections? These should also be distinct fromreflections.
4 If you’ve found none of the above, there must only be a translation!
Remember. . .
1 Rotation points should not lie on reflection lines.
2 Glide reflections should not cross reflection lines.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 23 / 35
Identifying signatures: Example 1
This pattern has signature 22x.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 24 / 35
Identifying signatures: Example 1
This pattern has signature 22x.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 24 / 35
Identifying signatures: Example 1
This pattern has signature 22x.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 24 / 35
Identifying signatures: Example 2
This pattern has signature 22*.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 25 / 35
Identifying signatures: Example 2
This pattern has signature 22*.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 25 / 35
Identifying signatures: Example 2
This pattern has signature 22*.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 25 / 35
Identifying signatures around town: Example 1
This pattern has signature 2*22.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 26 / 35
Identifying signatures around town: Example 1
This pattern has signature 2*22.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 26 / 35
Identifying signatures around town: Example 1
This pattern has signature 2*22.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 26 / 35
Identifying signatures around town: Example 2
This pattern also has signature 2*22.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 27 / 35
Identifying signatures around town: Example 2
This pattern also has signature 2*22.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 27 / 35
Identifying signatures around town: Example 2
This pattern also has signature 2*22.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 27 / 35
Example 1 vs. Example 2
These brick walls have the same symmetry.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 28 / 35
Example 1 vs. Example 2
These brick walls have the same symmetry.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 28 / 35
Identifying signatures around town: Example 3
This pattern has signature 2222.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 29 / 35
Identifying signatures around town: Example 3
This pattern has signature 2222.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 29 / 35
Identifying signatures around town: Example 3
This pattern has signature 2222.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 29 / 35
Why only 17 types?
Let’s see why the $2 Theorem might imply there are only 17 signatures of planerepeating patterns:
Case 1: the signature is all blue (ABC. . . D).
Case 2: the signature is all red and no crosses (*ABC. . . D).
Case 3: the signature contains both red and blue or it contains an x.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 30 / 35
Why only 17 types?
Let’s see why the $2 Theorem might imply there are only 17 signatures of planerepeating patterns:
Case 1: the signature is all blue (ABC. . . D).
Case 2: the signature is all red and no crosses (*ABC. . . D).
Case 3: the signature contains both red and blue or it contains an x.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 30 / 35
Why only 17 types?
Let’s see why the $2 Theorem might imply there are only 17 signatures of planerepeating patterns:
Case 1: the signature is all blue (ABC. . . D).
Case 2: the signature is all red and no crosses (*ABC. . . D).
Case 3: the signature contains both red and blue or it contains an x.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 30 / 35
Why only 17 types?
Let’s see why the $2 Theorem might imply there are only 17 signatures of planerepeating patterns:
Case 1: the signature is all blue (ABC. . . D).
Case 2: the signature is all red and no crosses (*ABC. . . D).
Case 3: the signature contains both red and blue or it contains an x.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 30 / 35
Case 1: all blue
We know that the string ABC. . . D costs $2.
If there’s an o in the signature, then the signature is just o since this symbolcosts $2.
Otherwise, there must be more than two symbols in ABC. . . D, since theyeach cost less than $1.
If there are exactly three symbols, then the signature can only be 632, 442,or 333.
If there are more than three symbols, the signature must be 2222 since eachsymbol costs at least $ 1
2 .
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 31 / 35
Case 1: all blue
We know that the string ABC. . . D costs $2.
If there’s an o in the signature, then the signature is just o since this symbolcosts $2.
Otherwise, there must be more than two symbols in ABC. . . D, since theyeach cost less than $1.
If there are exactly three symbols, then the signature can only be 632, 442,or 333.
If there are more than three symbols, the signature must be 2222 since eachsymbol costs at least $ 1
2 .
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 31 / 35
Case 1: all blue
We know that the string ABC. . . D costs $2.
If there’s an o in the signature, then the signature is just o since this symbolcosts $2.
Otherwise, there must be more than two symbols in ABC. . . D, since theyeach cost less than $1.
If there are exactly three symbols, then the signature can only be 632, 442,or 333.
If there are more than three symbols, the signature must be 2222 since eachsymbol costs at least $ 1
2 .
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 31 / 35
Case 1: all blue
We know that the string ABC. . . D costs $2.
If there’s an o in the signature, then the signature is just o since this symbolcosts $2.
Otherwise, there must be more than two symbols in ABC. . . D, since theyeach cost less than $1.
If there are exactly three symbols, then the signature can only be 632, 442,or 333.
If there are more than three symbols, the signature must be 2222 since eachsymbol costs at least $ 1
2 .
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 31 / 35
Case 1: all blue
We know that the string ABC. . . D costs $2.
If there’s an o in the signature, then the signature is just o since this symbolcosts $2.
Otherwise, there must be more than two symbols in ABC. . . D, since theyeach cost less than $1.
If there are exactly three symbols, then the signature can only be 632, 442,or 333.
If there are more than three symbols, the signature must be 2222 since eachsymbol costs at least $ 1
2 .
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 31 / 35
Case 2: all red and no x
Note that *ABC. . . D costs $2 if and only if ABC. . . D does:
$1 +A− 1
2A+ · · ·+ N − 1
2N= $2 ⇐⇒ $
A− 1
A+ · · ·+ N − 1
N= $2
Thus, the possible signatures in this case are *632, *442, *333, *2222, or **.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 32 / 35
Case 2: all red and no x
Note that *ABC. . . D costs $2 if and only if ABC. . . D does:
$1 +A− 1
2A+ · · ·+ N − 1
2N= $2 ⇐⇒ $
A− 1
A+ · · ·+ N − 1
N= $2
Thus, the possible signatures in this case are *632, *442, *333, *2222, or **.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 32 / 35
Case 3: hybrid types
Note that given a signature with either red and blue symbols or an x, we canmake the following cost-preserving substitutions:
replace *nn with n*replace a final * with x
And these can be reversed by
replacing n* with *nnreplacing a x with *
So, we can use the signatures *632, *442, *333, *2222, or ** to determine allpossible hybrid signatures of $2 value:
*632 *442 *333 *2222 **↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
4*2 3*3 2*22 *x↓ ↓
22* xx↓
22x
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 33 / 35
Case 3: hybrid types
Note that given a signature with either red and blue symbols or an x, we canmake the following cost-preserving substitutions:
replace *nn with n*
replace a final * with x
And these can be reversed by
replacing n* with *nnreplacing a x with *
So, we can use the signatures *632, *442, *333, *2222, or ** to determine allpossible hybrid signatures of $2 value:
*632 *442 *333 *2222 **↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
4*2 3*3 2*22 *x↓ ↓
22* xx↓
22x
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 33 / 35
Case 3: hybrid types
Note that given a signature with either red and blue symbols or an x, we canmake the following cost-preserving substitutions:
replace *nn with n*replace a final * with x
And these can be reversed by
replacing n* with *nnreplacing a x with *
So, we can use the signatures *632, *442, *333, *2222, or ** to determine allpossible hybrid signatures of $2 value:
*632 *442 *333 *2222 **↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
4*2 3*3 2*22 *x↓ ↓
22* xx↓
22x
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 33 / 35
Case 3: hybrid types
Note that given a signature with either red and blue symbols or an x, we canmake the following cost-preserving substitutions:
replace *nn with n*replace a final * with x
And these can be reversed by
replacing n* with *nn
replacing a x with *
So, we can use the signatures *632, *442, *333, *2222, or ** to determine allpossible hybrid signatures of $2 value:
*632 *442 *333 *2222 **↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
4*2 3*3 2*22 *x↓ ↓
22* xx↓
22x
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 33 / 35
Case 3: hybrid types
Note that given a signature with either red and blue symbols or an x, we canmake the following cost-preserving substitutions:
replace *nn with n*replace a final * with x
And these can be reversed by
replacing n* with *nnreplacing a x with *
So, we can use the signatures *632, *442, *333, *2222, or ** to determine allpossible hybrid signatures of $2 value:
*632 *442 *333 *2222 **↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
4*2 3*3 2*22 *x↓ ↓
22* xx↓
22x
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 33 / 35
Case 3: hybrid types
Note that given a signature with either red and blue symbols or an x, we canmake the following cost-preserving substitutions:
replace *nn with n*replace a final * with x
And these can be reversed by
replacing n* with *nnreplacing a x with *
So, we can use the signatures *632, *442, *333, *2222, or ** to determine allpossible hybrid signatures of $2 value:
*632 *442 *333 *2222 **↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
4*2 3*3 2*22 *x↓ ↓
22* xx↓
22x
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 33 / 35
Conclusion: only 17 signatures!
So, we have
5 blue signatures
5 red signatures
7 hybrid signatures: 4*2, 3*3, 2*2, *x, 22*, xx, and 22x.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 34 / 35
Thank you!
For more information, check out The Symmetries of Things by John HortonConway – an excellent, accessible read for mathematicians andnon-mathematicians alike.
David Morawski (UMN) The symmetry of wallpaper 25 March, 2011 35 / 35