the sesar target concept of operations asas related aspects presented by andy barff – drafting...

32
The SESAR Target Concept of Operations ASAS Related Aspects Presented by Andy Barff – Drafting Team Member Task 222

Upload: amberly-gordon

Post on 28-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

The SESAR Target Concept of OperationsASAS Related Aspects

Presented by

Andy Barff – Drafting Team Member Task 222

Dat

e: 1

7090

7

Page: 2

Topics

• A Trajectory Based Environment• ATM Capability Levels• ASAS in the SESAR environment• ASAS Delivering Performance

• Safety – Airport Surface

• Airport Capacity – Low Visibility Operations, Merging and Spacing, Closely Spaced Parallel Approaches

• Airspace Capacity – Task Delegation

• Efficiency and Environment – Close as possible to User Preferred Trajectory, Cruise-climb

• Access/Equity and Flexibility – Mixed operations

• Conclusions

Dat

e: 1

7090

7

Page: 3

SESAR is

Performance Driven

Process Orientated

Trajectory Based

Founded on SWIM

Dat

e: 1

7090

7

Page: 4

A Trajectory Based Environment

• Trajectory based operations• A new approach to airspace design and flexible airspace management

• Business Trajectory ownership• User involvement in decision making processes

• Users determine how constraints shall be applied whenever possible

• Trajectory management• An agreed 4D trajectory for each flight – as close as possible to the user preferred

trajectory which may include cruise climb - route structures only deployed when/where essential for capacity reasons.

• Authorised by controllers using new separation modes or executed by the flight crew using airborne separation modes

• Executed with an agreed precision

• Trajectory revisions respect the concept of ownership

• 4D trajectories are the principle language for information sharing

Dat

e: 1

7090

7

Page: 5

The SESAR Timescale

ATM Capability Levels

Dat

e: 1

7090

7

Page: 6

ATM Capability Levels

“Current Aircraft”: ADS-B/out (position/aircraft/met data); Avionics with 2D-RNP, vertical constraint management and a single RTA; Datalink: Event reporting/Intent sharing

0

1

2

3

2010 2020 2030

AT

M C

apab

ilit

y L

evel

SESAR 2020 Requirements: Trajectory Sharing meeting ATM requirements; Avionics with Vertical Navigation Performance capability; multiple RTA and Airborne Separation capability

Available 2025+: Trajectory Sharing Air-Air; Met data sharing (Air-Air/Air-Ground); Avionics with Longitudinal Navigation Performance Capability (4D Contract) and Airborne Self-Separation

4

Aircraft Delivered 2013 onwards: ADS-B/IN and avionics enabling airborne spacing – “Sequencing and Merging”; Datalink: Link 2000+ applications

Aircraft is a “node” on the SWIM network

CDTI

Dat

e: 1

7090

7

Page: 7

ASAS Applications

SESAR Context

Dat

e: 1

7090

7

Page: 8

ASAS Applications

Situational Awareness (ATSA) - aware of all surrounding traffic and its intent

TOD

Dat

e: 1

7090

7

Page: 9

ASAS Applications

Situational Awareness (ATSA) - aware of all surrounding traffic and its intent

Intention of previous landing aircraftto vacate via the rapid exit

Dat

e: 1

7090

7

Page: 10

ASAS Applications

TOD

90secs

Spacing (ASPA) – aware of all surrounding traffic and its intent - achieve and maintain a specific time/distance behind the specified aircraft ahead

Dat

e: 1

7090

7

Page: 11

ASAS Applications

TOD

Separation (ASEP) – aware of all surrounding traffic and its intent – execute airborne separation in relation to other specified aircraft trajectories

Dat

e: 1

7090

7

Page: 12

ASAS Applications

TOD

Separation (ASEP) – aware of all surrounding traffic and its intent – execute airborne separation in relation to other specified aircraft trajectories

Dat

e: 1

7090

7

Page: 13

ASAS Applications

Managed Airspace

Self-Separation (SSEP) – aware of all surrounding traffic and its intent – execute airborne separation in relation to all other aircraft trajectories

SSEP in mixed airspace is perhaps the most

challenging SESAR concept aspect

However SSEP in very low densityhigh altitude airspace may be feasible

in a relatively short time-scale

Dat

e: 1

7090

7

Page: 14

ASAS Applications

Managed Airspace

Self-Separation (SSEP) – awareness of all surrounding traffic and its intent – execute airborne separation in relation to all other traffic

Particularly as an enabler to cruise climb….

Dat

e: 1

7090

7

Page: 15

ASAS Delivering Performance

Situational Awareness for Safetyon the Airport Surface

Dat

e: 1

7090

7

Page: 16

ASAS Delivering Performance

• Situation Awareness (ATSA) delivering safety on the airport surface• Comair 5191 Lexington accident 27/08/06: NTSB recommends “the installation of

cockpit moving map displays or an automatic system that alerts pilots when a takeoff is attempted on a taxiway or a runway other than the one intended”

• ASMGCS is foreseen to provided surveillance, safety and surface guidance information to controllers – only in its most sophisticated form (level 4) cockpit systems are included

• SESAR advocates the accelerated development of cockpit based displays providing guidance and warnings directly to the flight crew as well as the controller

• Prime SESAR safety goal is the elimination of ATM related accidents on the airport surface

• The SESAR SWIM network will facilitate the flow of all relevant data directly to wherever it is needed (air-air, air-ground, ground-air)

Dat

e: 1

7090

7

Page: 17

ASAS Delivering Performance

ASAS Spacing for Consistent Runway Throughput

Dat

e: 1

7090

7

Page: 18

ASAS Delivering Performance

• Airport Capacity – ASAS Spacing (ASPA) delivering consistent runway throughput:• Delegation of specific tasks to flight crew

• SESAR foresees P-RNAV routings merging towards final approach facilitating continuous descent approaches (CDA)

• The proposed arrival management technique is the use of Controlled Time of Arrival (CTA) over a waypoint in the vicinity of the airport (exploiting FMS RTA capability) resulting in the precise sequencing of traffic

• ASPA techniques can be used to facilitate the accurate merging of trajectories into a final single stream

• ASPA can then ensure precise time-based spacing on final approach

• ASPA techniques relieve controllers of multiple routine tasks

Dat

e: 1

7090

7

Page: 19

SEQUENCEArrival Management processes assure an optimum arrival sequence

by the allocation of Controlled Time of Arrival (CTA) at an appropriate fix

MERGEASPA Merging technique achieves

precise pair-wise time-based spacing at fix

SPACEASPA in trail time-based spacing

- precise final approach spacing

In all wind conditions

Dat

e: 1

7090

7

Page: 20

ASAS Delivering Performance

ASAS Separation for Safety and Capacityon the Airport Surface in Low Visibility

Dat

e: 1

7090

7

Page: 21

ASAS Delivering Performance

• Airport Capacity - Maintaining airport throughput in low visibility by use of ASEP• The logical step beyond ATSA on the airport surface is an ASAS Separation

application (ASEP-SURF) enabling flight crew to provide separation on taxiways when unable to see outside the flight deck

• SESAR provides opportunities for new techniques based on enhanced sharing and display of information to both controllers and flight crew

• Increasing safety and maintaining throughput in Low Visibility Conditions are leading characteristics of the SESAR concept

Dat

e: 1

7090

7

Page: 22

ASAS Delivering Performance

ASAS Separation Maximising Throughput ofClosely Spaced Parallel Runways

Dat

e: 1

7090

7

Page: 23

ASAS Delivering Performance

• Airport Capacity – ASAS Separation improving the exploitation of existing and future closely spaced parallel runways avoiding the high costs of building segregated runways – ASEP-CSPA• In IMC precision monitoring is required for parallel approaches spaced between

1525mtrs and 1035mtrs

• High precision RNAV combined with cockpit monitoring of separation may provide an alternative to ground based monitoring

• ASEP-CSPA has the potential to unlock additional capacity if the concept can be proved to be safe and efficient at spacing of less than 1035mtrs (existing and future runways)

• A lot of research and analysis has already been conducted, the problem is well understood

• SESAR capabilities may offer a chance to develop acceptable procedures within a reasonable timescale

• Contributing to the SESAR objective of maintaining throughput in all weathers

Dat

e: 1

7090

7

Page: 24

Sequence to fix – continuous descent

Slowly converging “separated” P-RNAV routes – no need for a “platform altitude”ASEP automated monitoring of parallel streams

ASEP monitoring replaces radar monitoringbefore radar separation is lost Optimised arrival stream

- maximising landing rate- limited only by wake vortex

ACAS will need to be filteredfor designated aircraft

Dat

e: 1

7090

7

Page: 25

ASAS Delivering Performance

ASAS Separation Reducing Controller Task Load per Flight – Increasing Airspace Capacity

Dat

e: 1

7090

7

Page: 26

ASAS Delivering Performance

• Airspace Capacity - reducing controller task load per flight – ASEP techniques• This involves the delegation of both tasks and responsibility

• This aspect has been given high importance by SESAR but we know that research has yet to confirm real potential

• The SESAR environment of precision trajectories will enable conflict situations to be detected and resolved earlier due to better predictions and precision clearances – can ASEP provide tactical resolution of residual conflicts thereby potentially reducing controller workload?

• Can ASEP techniques enable airspace users to determine the most efficient solution – given the constraint? (the conflicting aircraft)

• Also minimising disturbance to the most efficient trajectory?

Dat

e: 1

7090

7

Page: 27

Conflict Resolution - ASAS Solution (courtesy of Dassault Aviation)

000

5

SEPARATIONF7X F-WIDE3 nm 03:30

NTS62.5 nm 08:00

11 44 Z

FMS1

X1ADS-B will provide :

An accurate position of the Intruder

The Track of the Intruder

The Ground Speed of the Intruderand so the intruder relative course

Appropriated route change might be proposed to the pilot

020

5SEPARATION F7X F-WIDE5 nm 03:20

X122.5 nm 04:30

11 38 ZX1

FMS1

If the target is designated by ground systems = ASEP If target is designated by airborne systems = SSEP

In both cases – airborne resolutionFor pilot – no real difference

Dat

e: 1

7090

7

Page: 28

ASAS Delivering Performance

• Efficiency and the Environment• The SESAR concept documents state that the User Preferred Trajectory may

include cruise climb segments (5% fuel saving even if just at very high altitude)• Airborne self-separation techniques may enable cruise-climb at high altitude• Airborne separation techniques can assure minimum disruption of trajectory• However…..

• Access and Equity, Flexibility• SESAR states that there shall be no segregation on basis of equipment• Therefore airborne separation techniques must be integrated in managed airspace

operations • SESAR foresees a mixed environment where non-ASAS equipped a/c will be

receiving a separation service and ASAS equipped a/c may separate themselves from all other aircraft

• So….

Dat

e: 1

7090

7

Page: 29

ASAS Delivering Performance

• Can ASEP and SSEP perform in the SESAR mixed equipage environment?• The trajectories of all aircraft will be known and shared

• Trajectories are foreseen to be more stable than today with much less last minute tactical intervention – problems will be detected earlier thanks to precise trajectory predictions and resolved with closed-loop trajectory revisions

• Therefore in Low/Medium density operations there should be very few “last minute” control interventions

• In this more stable environment could a paradigm shift in separation provision occur with ASAS becoming the “tactical mode” when needed (rarely)?

Dat

e: 1

7090

7

Page: 30

An integrated approach

NextGen ASAS applications Oceanic ASAS applications

ASPA Merging

and Spacing

ASEP-CSPA

SSEP

ASEP

(SSEP in low density?)

SURF applications

A global family of advanced techniques

- delivering enhanced performance

Dat

e: 1

7090

7

Page: 31

Conclusions

• ASAS is expected to make a significant contribution to achieving the SESAR performance objectives

• The validation process will address this claim• Airborne separation has a role in all airspace types • Focus of research should be on the ASAS applications that have the potential

to deliver the required performance in the long term• Be they simple – ATSA-SURF

• Or the most challenging – SSEP in a mixed environment

• The right form of phased approach will emerge• ATM procedures using ASAS must be safe, simple, homogenous – a global

family of advanced techniques delivering enhanced performance• Co-ordination is required with NextGen and then ICAO

• EUROCONTROL/FAA Action Plan 23 can facilitate prioritising and co-ordination

Dat

e: 1

7090

7

Page: 32

SESAR D3 Milestone Deliverable

Contains the Target Concept of Operations

Publication within a few days