the return of sectionalism and the rise of andrew jackson unit 4, lesson 4
TRANSCRIPT
Essential Idea
• Sectionalism returned as the country expanded and evolved and when Andrew Jackson rose to power.
Era of Good Feelings?
• Misnomer?• Even during the “Era of
Good Feelings,” signs of sectionalism arose
• Sectionalism- growing separation and tension between the North and South (and West)
North vs. South: Federal Power• Issue #1:• Federal Power• North’s View:• Strong federal government,
weak state governments• South’s View:• Weak federal government,
strong state governments• Why Sectionalism
Increased:• John Marshall’s rulings
strengthened federal power over states
• The South feared a strong federal government threatened slavery
North vs. South: Vision for Country
• Issue #2: • Vision for Country• North’s View:• Economy based on
manufacturing and commerce
• South’s View:• Economy based on
agrarianism—especially slavery-based cotton
North vs. South: American System
• Why Sectionalism Increased:• Federal policies, like the American
System, favored manufacturing and commerce
• The South and West did not trust the BUS
• The South hated protective tariffs and had fewer internal improvements
North vs. South: Westward Expansion
• Issue #3: • Westward Expansion• North’s View:• Did not want slavery to expand
westward• South’s View:• Wanted slavery to expand
westward• Why Sectionalism Increased:• North and South disagreed on
future of slavery in America• Imbalance between free and
slave states would allow one side to dominate in Congress
The Missouri Compromise (1820)• Conflict:• Missouri wanted to be admitted as a slave state, which would upset the balance• Tension rose because this would upset the free/slave state balance in Congress• Compromise:• Missouri Compromise• Proposed by Henry Clay, the “Great Compromiser”
The Missouri Compromise (1820)• Terms:• Part 1:• Missouri admitted as a slave state,
Maine admitted as a free state• Effect:• Free and slave states stayed equal in
number• Part 2:• 36’30⁰ Line- divided the rest of the
Louisiana Territory• Future state above the line would be
free• Future states below the line would be
slave• Effect: • Issue of slavery in the West temporarily
settled, easing tension• Missouri Compromise
Election of 1824
• Major Candidates in 1824:
• Andrew Jackson- “Old Hickory,” the war hero
• Andrew Jackson• John Quincy Adams-
son of ex-president John Adams
• Henry Clay- “Great Compromiser,” developer of the American System
The Election Hits a Snag
• Initial Results:• Jackson won
the most electoral votes, but no one won the MAJORITY
• The election was decided in the House of Representatives
The “Corrupt Bargain”• The “Corrupt Bargain:”• In the House, Clay gave
his votes to Adams, who became president
• Adams made Clay his secretary of state
• Jackson was furious and called it a “corrupt bargain”
Political Parties Return• Political Parties Return:• The Democratic-Republican
party split• The two-party system and
political tension returned • New Party:• Democrats• Supported:• Andrew Jackson• Location of Supporters: • South and West• Government Power:• Weak federal, strong states
Political Parties Return
• New Party:• Whigs• Supported:• Henry Clay, John Quincy Adams• Location of Supporters:• North• Government Power:• Strong federal, weak states
Universal White Male Suffrage• Universal White Male
Suffrage:• From 1824 to 1828, many
states dropped their property requirements for voting
• Consequences:• Universal White Male
Suffrage- white men, even poor (“common”), could vote
• This gave the “common man” more influence in elections
• The common man loved Andrew Jackson
Election of 1828• Candidates in 1828:• Democrats- Andrew Jackson• Whigs- John Quincy Adams • Impact of Universal White Male Suffrage:• Jackson got more votes than in 1824 because he
appealed to the common man, who could now vote• Candidates had to campaign for the first time to attract
votes from the common man• Mudslinging- candidates used negative criticism of each
other to attract votes