the new suez canal - esteri · 2019-11-29 · suez panama trade route distance (nautical miles)...
TRANSCRIPT
The New Suez Canal
Massimo DEANDREIS
SRM Managing Director
Cairo, November 29th 2015
2
� The Growth of Mediterranean
Trade
� Strategies and Trends
� Big Phenomena and the Impact
on Ports and Shipping
Main Topics of the Study
3
South MED: a Fast-Growing Area
GDP: South MED vs EU. Constant prices (1970=100)
� The cumulative GDP of Southern MED countries in 2014 was almost 6 times higherthan in 1970, with an average annual growth of 4.1% (Egypt: 5.6%). The EU recorded anannual growth of 2.2% in the same period.
� The cumulative Foreign Trade of Southern MED countries in 2014 was almost €750 bn(1/6 compared with EU’s foreign trade). It was almost 5 times higher than in 1995, with anaverage annual growth of 9.4% (Egypt: 11.3%), higher than the EU’s one (6.3%).
Source: SRM on Unctad data
Foreign Trade: South MED vs EU. 1995=100
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
197
01
97
21
97
41
97
61
97
81
98
01
98
21
98
41
98
61
98
81
99
01
99
21
99
41
99
61
99
82
00
02
00
22
00
42
00
62
00
82
01
02
01
22
01
4
South Med EU
European UnionAverage Annual Growth:
+2.2%
South MedAverage Annual Growth:
+4.1%
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
South Med EU
South MedAverage Annual G.
+9.4%
European UnionAverage Annual Growth:
+6.3%
4
South MED: a Fast-Growing Area
GDP: South MED vs EU. Constant prices (1970=100)
� The cumulative GDP of Southern MED countries in 2014 was almost 6 times higherthan in 1970, with an average annual growth of 4.1% (Egypt: 5.6%). The EU recorded anannual growth of 2.2% in the same period.
� The cumulative Foreign Trade of Southern MED countries in 2014 was almost €750 bn(1/6 compared with EU’s foreign trade). It was almost 5 times higher than in 1995, with anaverage annual growth of 9.4% (Egypt: 11.3%), higher than the EU’s one (6.3%).
Source: SRM on Unctad data
Foreign Trade: South MED vs EU. 1995=100
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
197
01
97
21
97
41
97
61
97
81
98
01
98
21
98
41
98
61
98
81
99
01
99
21
99
41
99
61
99
82
00
02
00
22
00
42
00
62
00
82
01
02
01
22
01
4
South Med EU Egypt
European UnionAverage Annual Growth:
+2.2%
EgyptAverage Annual Growth:
+5.6%
South MedAverage Annual Growth:
+4.1%
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
South Med EU Egypt
South MedAverage Annual G.
+9.4%
European UnionAverage Annual Growth:
+6.3%
EgyptAverage Annual Growth:
+11.3%
5
Italy-South Med Trade: +81% in the 2001-2015 period� Trade relations between Italy and Southern MED countries (net of Energy products)
is estimated at € 35.5 bn in 2015, +81.2% compared to 2001; Italy-Egypt trade: €3.5bn in 2015, +80.3% compared to 2001
� Competitors’ performances in 2001-2015 period: France: +76%; Germany: +125%.
� Italian exports vs. Southern MED countries doubled in the 2001-2015 period (€ 28 bn).
� Italy’s exports vs. South Med and Gulf (€45.9 bn) are equal to Italy’s exports vs. Chinaand the US combined (€46.8 bn).
Source: SRM on Eurostat and data
Trade with the South Med Area: Italy and European Competitors. €bn
* SRM estimates
19.6
35.5
25.0
44.1
24.6
55.2
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015*
Italy France Germany
Germany
France
Italy
6
Italy-South Med Trade: +81% in the 2001-2015 period� Trade relations between Italy and Southern MED countries (net of Energy products)
is estimated at € 35.5 bn in 2015, +81.2% compared to 2001; Italy-Egypt trade: €3.5bn in 2015, +80.3% compared to 2001
� Competitors’ performances in 2001-2015 period: France: +76%; Germany: +125%.
� Italian exports vs. Southern MED countries doubled in the 2001-2015 period (€ 28 bn).
� Italy’s exports vs. South Med and Gulf (€45.9 bn) are equal to Italy’s exports vs. Chinaand the US combined (€46.8 bn).
Source: SRM on Eurostat and data
Trade with the South Med Area: Italy and European Competitors. €bn
* SRM estimates
19.6
35.5
25.0
44.1
24.6
55.2
5.1
52.6
37.7
57.8
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015*
Italy France Germany China USA
Germany
France
Italy
China
USA
7
27.8 32.0 Spain30.3
37.0 France
36.4 41.0 Italy
26.0
31.6 Germany
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
€ Bn
Spain France Italy Germany
The Mediterranean Basin is Becoming a Central Item in the World Agenda: Italy is 1st in Sea Trade
� The freight traffic in the Med basin increased by more than 120% in the 2000-
2014 period.
� The Mediterranean catches around 19% of the global freight traffic; the
percentage was 15% in 2005.
� With € 36.4 bn, Italy is the biggest sea trade partner of the South Med Area.
� 76% of trade between South Med Area’s and Italy travels by sea.
Fonte: Eurostat, 2015
Southern Med Area’s Maritime Trade with the Main EU CountriesForecasts*
* Forecasts SRM
8
47%
8%
12%
7%
7%
7%
2%2% 8%
Northern Range43%
South Med10%
West Med12%
East Med11%
Black Sea6%
UK*7%
Atlantic2%
Baltic Sea2%
Italy7%
2008 2014
The Analysis of Container Ports by Geographic Area: acomparison between Med Area and North Europe
� In the 2008 - 2014 period, the ports of the East Med Coast increased their
market share from 7% to 11%. The Southern Med Coast grew too.
Source: SRM on Port Autorities
MED AREA ISGROWING
NORTHERN RANGE IS SLOWING
9
5%
18%
17%
18%
7%
19%
12%2%
2%
Tanger Med
11%
Gioia Tauro
11%
Port Said
15%
Algeciras
17%
Damietta
3%
Valencia
16%
Marsaxlokk
11%
Cagliari
3%
Piraeus
13%
20082014
Ranking of Container Hub Ports in the Mediterranean Basin: the Market Share
Source: SRM on Port Autorities
� 2009–2014: The Market Share of Southern Hub Ports (Tanger Med; Port Said;
Damietta) is stable at 30%. Algeciras ranks 1st.
� Tanger Med and Piraeus have had a dramatic growth.
� Egypt plans to complete a side Channel in the East Port Said near the Suez
Canal in order to speed up shipping and allow ships to enter the port by the end
of June 2016 this new side channel will increase traffic.
10
New Centrality of the Mediterranean: The Emergence of Europe-Far East Route
27%
44%
53%
42%
20% 13%
1995 2014
Transatlantic
Transpacific
Europe-Far East
Estimated containerized cargo flows on major East–West container trade routes, 1995–2014(percentage TEU)
Source: SRM on Unctad, 2015
� Within the three main deep sea East-West shipping services the Europe-Far Eastprogressively gained traffic raising its share from 27% in 1995 to 44% in 2014.
� In 2014, the Europe-Far East and the Transpacific are definitely the two biggest tradelanes, accounting both for 22 mln. TEUs of traffic. As a result of this growth, theMediterranean basin and its ports recovered their own “centrality”, thanks to the transit
of (almost) all mother vessels via the route Suez.
11
� Transit goods account for 8-10% of the entire globe. In 2014, 822 million tonnesof goods passed through the Canal.
� Between 2000 and 2014, north-south container trade volumes grew by 187% whilethe south-north ones grew by 220%.
� 17.000 ships passed through the canal.
� Between 2000 and 2014 the Canal’s traffic trends recorded a 120% increase in transitgoods.
The traffic in the Suez Canal: Ships and Cargo
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
-
5
10
15
20
25
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Carg
o t
on
(m
illi
on
)
Sh
ips n
um
ber
(th
ou
san
d)
Ships Number of which containerships Cargo
Source: SRM on Suez Port Autority, forecasts 2015
12
Source: SRM on Suez Canal Authority, 2015
Main Cargo Flows Southbound through the Suez Canal. Var. % 2001-2014
416 mln tons
13
Source: SRM on Suez Canal Authority, 2015
Main Cargo Flows Northbound through the Suez Canal. Var. % 2001-2014
406 mln tons
14
Dubai
JeddahKhor
Fakkan/SharjahSalalah
Shahid RajaeeDammam
-
2.000
4.000
6.000
8.000
10.000
12.000
14.000
16.000
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Port Country
∆∆∆∆ % 2009-2014
Dubai UAE 36.9
JeddahSaudi Arabia 35.9
KhorFakkan/Sharjah UAE 38.2
Salalah Oman -13.9
Shahid Rajaee Iran -35.9
DammamSaudi Arabia 42.6
Gulf 23.2
The Strategic Role of Ports and Logistics in the Gulf
� The UAE retained its position as the best performer among Arab
countries and the broader region.
� Dubai Port ranks 1st handling 15,2 million TEU in 2014 and growing by
more than 36% in the period 2009 - 2014.
� Overall, the container traffic of the Area grew by more than 23% in the
in the period 2009- 2014.
Gulf Area’s Container traffic 2009-2014 (000 of tonn)
Source: SRM on Port Authorities, 2015
15
New Panama Canal’s Limit
New Suez Canal
Two Big Phenomena in the Maritime Economy:1. Increasing Ship Size
13,200 TEU
16
The Orderbook for 2018
17
2. The Big Alliances among Carriers
Source: Drewry, 2015
The big alliances «2M» and «Ocean Three» are mostly active on the route Asia-Med
2M
32%
O3
19%
CKYHE
26%
G6
23%
Asia - North Europe
2M
39%
O3
27%
CKYHE
20%
G6
8%
Others
5%
Asia - Med
� The big alliances create economies of scale-reducing costs, improving profitability,services and environment.
� There is a relevant interest of big alliances for routes through Suez Canal.
MARKET CONCENTRATION IN TWO ROUTES THAT INVOLVE SUEZ
18
Suez Panama
Trade route Distance (Nautical miles) Days of sailing Days of sailing
Shanghai-Rotterdam 10,525 29 37
Hong Kong-New York 11,593 32 31
Shanghai-New York 12,370 34 30
Shanghai-Houston 13,932 39 28
An Example of the New Suez Canal Impact: Route Benefits
� The graph shows 4 examples of routes and the impact of the New Suez Canal
Case studies on a panel of strings
=
=
Route where Suez is already more
convenient
Route where Suez will be much more
potentially convenient than Panama
Route where there are no
significant effects
Route where Suez will be more
potentially convenient than Panama
19
� SRM estimated that using the Suez route, any shipping company may have anaverage saving between 5% and 10% on the total operating costs(depending on routes, distances and companies characteristics).
� For each ship, the time reduction from 18 to 11 hours, due to the New SuezCanal, would lead to an estimated cost saving of:
The Economic Impact of the New Suez Canal: OperationalCost Savings and Lower Costs of Immobilization
Total Average expected saving
will be: €180 m per year
South East Asia €61 m North West Europe, U.K. €49.4 m Arabian Gulf
€48.4 m
If we consider that, in 2014, 17,148 ships passed the Canal, 6,129 of which were containerships:
• €10,499 for each ship (average)€12,004 for each containership
€150,000 for each cruise ship
Lower costs of immobilization cargo
will be: €154.6 m per year
20
Estimated benefits by 2030:
New Suez Canal:
The direct economic benefits for the operators in the
transport sector
€4.4 billion
Reduction of operating costs
(net current value):
€2.5 bn
environmental benefits + reduction in the number of hours spent waiting
and for anchoring operations of all the ships transiting the Canal.
Indirect
benefits:
Lower freight immobilization
(net current value):
€1.9 bn
Current and Future Benefits of the New Suez Canal
Lower operational costs for
maritime companies: €180 m
Lower costs of immobilization
of cargo: €154.6 m
Current benefits
21
The additional quantity of TEU that will
sail the Mediterranean via Suez
Case study only on one route: Far East-East Coast US
25%If the New Suez Canal catches this Percentage
of the total traffic through Panama
1 m TEU
18%
171,000The amount of TEUs that Italy can intercept
The Economic Impact of the New Suez Canal on Italian Ports
Italy market share of the Transhipment traffic
in Med
� A case study on the trade route Far East-East Coast US (accounts 7.4 million TEU)(Source: Alphaliner)
51% pass throughPanama Canal
3.8 m TEU
49% pass throughSuez Canal
3.6 m TEU
22
� 170 ships operate in the cruise market, 67 of them passing through the SuezCanal.The enlargment of the Canal could increase the number of cruise forthe major Egyptian ports (Hurgada, Safaga and Sharm El Sheikh).
As a result:
1. New structured packages dedicated to the Red Sea could be offered as a newitem by major operators.
2. It could de-seasonalize the offer extending the cruise season to autumn andwinter also providing tours and cultural excursion across the SouthMediterranean, the Red Sea and the Gulf.
The Effects of the Enlargment for the Cruiser Market may bring Development
Estimated
Benefits
� In the medium term, the impact could be about 4%
of the market value of the Mediterranean, equal to
1,000,000 cruise passengers in the 5 main ports of the
Red Sea.� economic direct impact of €120 per passenger.
23
Conclusions
� The New Suez Canal will have a major impact onshipping and trade in the Mediterranean.
� It will increase the centrality of the Mediterranean as
a bridge among Asia, the Gulf and the East Coastof the North America.
� The two phenomena of naval gigantism and
shipping alliances will be emphasized by the New
Suez Canal.
� Italy is one of the European countries that could
benefits more from this new infrastructure.
24
Thanks for your attention
Websites: srm-maritimeconomy.com
srm-med.com
SRM Maritime Observatory
2011
2014
SRM Mediterranean Observatory