The new Grant Regulations

How will it impact on the FP&M Sector?

Introduction

• Grant Regulations regarding monies received by a SETA and related matters –published in Government Notice No. 35940,

3 December 2012

General problem statement

• General sentiment that SETAs are not assisting in addressing skills shortages / gaps

• Poor research and monitoring of impact• Poor detailed planning • The structure of education & training lacks

the workplace component• No commitment to reach higher levels (L4) Especially to prepare for Trade Tests

• Many scarce skills involve high level qualifications (many years to complete)– SETAs promoted short courses

• Current grant disbursement is disproportionate (private providers)

• There’s absence of effective monitoring & evaluation–Absence of impact valuation

• Lack of clarity of intention

General problem statement

Lack of clarity of intention

• Lack of intention & clarity in strategy–Allocations not aligned to SSP priorities

• SETA policies & procedures have little relevance to achieving planned impact

• Training programmes do not make clear what is intended & whether the intention has been achieved

Purpose of the new regulations

• To allow the SETAs to set clear objectives but avoid specific numerical targets

• To improve the focus, management and effectiveness of SETA grant spending–By developing policies & procedures• For allocation•Monitoring•Reporting

Intent of the New Regulations• Regulate admin fund• Provide for SETAs to contribute to QCTO• Discourage accumulation of surpluses• Improve quality and quantity of labour market

information• Promote NQF registered and quality assured PIVOTAL

programmes• Create framework for expanded use of public

education and training providers.

Significant Changes: Skills Development Levy Distribution

Skills Development Levy Distribution

• Distribution of levy income

Significant Changes: Mandatory Grants

The intention of Mandatory Grants is to incentivize employers to:

• to plan & implement training for their employees

• to create training and work experience opportunities for the unemployed people

Significant Changes

• Mandatory Grant Applications– Year 14 (2013/14) – submission due by 30 June

2013– Year 15 (2014/15) onwards – submission due by

30 April– Better alignment with skills development and

financial year– Enhanced SETA planning cycle• SSP Annual Update• Earlier Discretionary Funding Windows

Significant Changes

• Mandatory Grants (continued)– Increased monitoring of WSP implementation

against Board criteria• Criteria for approval • Evidence requirements• Quality & accuracy standards for WSPs & ATRs

– Evidence of consultation and sign-off by labour representative (unless explanation is provided)

Significant Changes: Discretionary Grants

The intention of Discretionary Grants is to implement the

Sector Skills Plan

Discretionary Grants: Key themes

• A well researched set of scarce and critical skills

• The recognition that current provision has limited practical and workplace learning component

• Need to focus on occupational qualifications at all levels

Significant Changes

• Discretionary Grant Applications– Discretionary grant categories not specified– Alignment with SSP implementation – Funding of PIVOTAL Programmes - 80% of

discretionary funding • Address Scarce and Critical skills in the sector• Current programmes will qualify e.g. learnerships,

bursaries, work experience, internships, apprenticeships, credit bearing skills programmes

– Qualifying criteria – PIVOTAL plan and report to be completed with WSP/ATR.

Significant Changes

• Public Education and Training Institutions– Emphasis in NSDS III on use of public institutions for

delivery of scarce and critical skills.– Industry currently almost exclusively use private

providers.– Public providers do not meet the needs of industry.– Need to restore the balance - how do we do this?• Public/Private/SETA partnerships• Discretionary funding allocation

– Public Institutions more cost effective & sustainable

Significant Changes

• Assisting Small Enterprises– Support to small enterprises require more emphasis– Simplified mandatory and discretionary grant

application processes– Simplified format for reporting on PIVOTAL training– Enhanced processing of grant payments due to small

enterprises– Projects designed to address skills needs of small

enterprises.

Grant Regulation Guidelines• DHET issued guidelines for implementation

– Left room for SETAs to be creative

“Each sector has different dynamics and contextual conditions. It would not be helpful for the

Department to state how SETAs should allocate resources to achieve the implementation of sector

specific plans set out in SSPs.However, what this means is that the SETAs

themselves need to put time and effort into the development of policies that are carefully aligned to

the objectives set out in their SSP.”

Conclusion

• FP&M SETA see the glass as OVERFLOWING!

• More discretionary funding– Address sector skills priorities– Renewed focus on meaningful training and education– Increased monitoring of training implementation– Redesigned SETA processes due to timeframes

• Will require support of all stakeholders to make full use of mandatory and discretionary grant application opportunities.

Thank You