The Israeli Supreme Court Ordered the Israeli Government to Investigate theNumber of Children Currently Suffering From EHS.On July 18, 2013, the Israeli Supreme Court ordered the Israeli Government to investigate howmany children in Israel already suffer from EHS.The Order was issued in response to a Petition to the Israeli Supreme Court to ban Wi-Fi in schoolsthat was submitted in August, 2012.The Government must submit the result of its investigation to the court by November 16, 2013.The Israeli Supreme Courts decision seems to indicate that the Court does not trust thegovernments statements as:(1) Not only did the court order the Gov. to check how many children are already sick with EHS,thereby accepting the existence of EHS and its correlation to radiation, but it also demanded that theGov. specify in its statement the exact measures it took in order to conduct the inquiry.(2) Another indication that the Court found the statement of the Gov. unreliable can be found inthe fact that the Supreme Court ordered that the Gov.s reply on November 16 , MUST besupported with a sworn affidavit; Meaning that every fact mentioned, data collected or statementmade in the Gov.s answer must be supported by an Affidavit, attesting to the truthfulness of theclaim.This order is the result of an extensive brief which was written by Dafna Tachover and submitted tothe Court on June 13, 2013. A 65-page brief, supported by 640 pages of appendices, it emphasized,amongst other things, the problem of EHS and claimed that it is unreasonable to expose children toWIFI when it is proven to cause sickness.Furthermore, it should be noted that in the July 18 Supreme Court hearing, when the Gov. wasasked what it intends to do if there would be a child with EHS attending the school, the attorney forthe Gov. answered: The WIFI will be turned off in the school.Ms. Dafna Tachover, herself an attorney, has been representing herself since Feb 2013. Mr. Bachwho represented her until that time is still representing the other Plaintiffs (including a NationalParent Organization and 2 children).It is Ms. Tachovers opinion that even though the Government lied about its policy in regard to thedeployment of WIFI, if the Court is not convinced that this technology is harmful and the damage isnot hypothetical and abstract but existent and real, it will not rule that the governments actions areunreasonable and will not ban the use of WIFI in schools.The brief claimed that the Court was unaware that the damage from wireless technology is provenand existing, as the Court, just like the public, loves its wireless gadgets and has been readingintentionally misleading headlines in the papers such as the ones claiming that no correlationbetween cell phones and cancer was proven over the past 15 years.The brief attempted to prove the following:(1) Prove EHS is an existing illness, caused by EMFs(2) Prove that the thermal safety standard was proven false as early as 40 years ago.(3) Prove that it is unreasonable to rely on WHO considering it is corrupt.(4) Prove that the Govs evaluation on the issue was unprofessional and negligent at best.(5) Prove how the industry intentionally misled the publicRegarding the safety standards the brief claimed:(1) The contention of the Government that the existing Israeli standard (1/10 of the ThermalStandard) Protects with absolute certainty from known adverse health effects is ridiculous as:

How can it be protective if Ms. Tachover and others are sick with EHS? How can it be protective when thousands of papers prove biological effects? How can it be protective when even the corrupt WHO declared RF a 2B carcinogen?(2) The brief showed that the government is so reckless in dealing with wireless technology that itdoes not even know of its own ignorance in how to measure radiation from WIFI considering thespecial modulation of WIFI.EHSThe brief emphasized the EHS issue to indicate that the damage already exists. Affidavits from 7professionals with EHS were provided, including an affidavit of a mother both daughters of whomsuffer from EHS, supporting scientific evidence was presented, and it was shown that thegovernment did nothing to investigate the issue despite ample notice and - legal obligation. Inaddition, the brief attempted to demonstrate the ridiculousness of the claim that the condition doesnot exist and/or that it is not proven to be caused by EMFs.It should be noted that in Ms. Tachovers correspondence with the Gov. Committees on the issue ofWi-Fi in schools prior to the submission of the lawsuit, the Committee eventually admitted theexistence of EHS the committee in its final report wrote:If there is a child with sensitivity to RF radiation, the Ministry will provide a solution on anindividual basis.What next:On Nov. 16 the Gov. must submit its Answer and the Plaintiffs will have to respond 15 days later.The Court indicated that following the submission of these responses, it intends to reach a decision.While the Court has still not made a decision, the Courts Order is an important development.In the summary of the brief Gandhis words were quoted:An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth becomeerror because nobody sees it. Truth stands, even if there be no public support. It is selfsustained. It seems that the court is recognizing the truth.Dafna Tachover Esq. (NY, Israel) MBA

4PO Box. 4, East Jewett, NY, 1242

0732-696361 : NY, 1242

dtachover@gmail.com :

http://ehsfighback.blogspot.co.uk/2012/09/hebrew-version-response-to-ignorant.html#more

4PO Box. 4, East Jewett, NY, 1242