the importance of test data in simulation meetings/october... · 2016-03-02 · liliana beldie,...
TRANSCRIPT
Liliana Beldie, Brian Walker, Arup, Solihull, UK
Measurements and Characterisation of
Human Tissues and Structures, Greenwich
29th October 2009
The Importance of Test Data in Simulation
Contents
• Arup – General overview
• Case studies:• Eye modelling
• Muscle modelling
• Summary
Arup
Engineering consultancy: building,
civil, transport, power, oil & gas,
environmental, mechanical,
automotive, railway, aerospace,
product development, healthcare.
Formed in 1946, the firm now has over 9000 staff based in 70 offices in 32 countries
Arup - Example Major Projects
• City Hall, London
• Olympic Stadium, Beijing
• Channel Tunnel Rail Link, England
• Beijing National Aquatics Centre, The Water Cube
• Transforming pathology services
• Delivering mobile diagnostic services
• Bringing new service providers to
market
• Developing new ways to finance
property
• Introducing new ways of teaching
• Assisting leadership in clinical reform
• Developing therapeutic environments
• Improving the users experience
• Communicating the value of good
design
• Improving layout to transform performance
Arup HealthcareA range of services to the UK Healthcare business.
• Product development of new medical devices and materials
• Introducing new methods, enhancing performance, and improving safety.
Arup Healthcare
Arup – Advanced Technology
and Research
Arup AT+R
• Group within the Consultancy Division of Arup
• Provides technology solutions to External and
Internal Clients
• Areas of expertise include• Vehicle Engineering
• Crashworthiness
• Occupant Protection
• Nuclear Packaging
• Wind Engineering
• Seismic Engineering
• Software Development
• …….
Oasys LS-DYNA® Environment Software
Arup AT+R Biomedical
• Eye modelling for:• Impact
• IOP measurement
Eye Model for impact
• Impact with golf ball
• Material Models:
• Skin – Mooney-Rivlin material model;
• Globe and fat – Elastic
• Globe and fat – linear elastic material ok?
• Skin – Mooney-Rivlin material ok?
• What is the model used for?
Eye Model for IOP
• Glaucoma is the second leading cause of blindness in the world
• High Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP), i.e. >22mmHg, is one of the causes of glaucoma
• IOP is the only proven modifiable risk factor to reduce the rate of progression of glaucoma
• This implies constantly monitoring the IOP
• Direct measurement of IOP through cannulation
• Indirect measurement of IOP – Goldman Applanation Tonometry (GAT) which is the golden standard of IOP measurement
• IOPG = Applanating Force/ Contact area
• Small contact area – diameter 3.06mm – the applanation will elevate the IOP only slightly
• GAT is based on an average Central Cornea Thickness CCT = 0.520mm
Eye Model for IOP
• Corneal Central Thickness (CCT) range 0.427-0.620mm:
• African-Americans 0.521mm
• Japanese 0.531mm
• Caucasians 0.550mm
• Refractive surgery – thinning of cornea
• There is an association between reduced CCT and advanced glaucoma, which may be partly due to inaccuracies in correctly measuring IOP
• Doughty and Zaman showed that a 10% change in CCT could result in a 3.4mmHg difference in IOP; for example:
• A patient with a measured IOP of 20mmHg and a CCT of 0.450mm (approx. 20% below normal) could potentially have a true IOP of 27mmHg
• Conversely, a patient with the same measured IOP of 20mmHg but aCCT of 0.650mm could have a true IOP of 13mmHg
• Goldman Applanation Tonometry – applanation of cornea
• This will give the IOP – but includes the stiffness of the cornea
• Stiffness of cornea depends on:
• Thickness of cornea
• Geometry of cornea
• Material properties (due to for ex. age)
• Thickness of cornea can be measured in conjunction with IOP test and correction factor added
• What about geometry & material parameters?
• Detailed FE model would be useful
Eye Model for IOP
• Needed for detailed FE model of the eye:
1. Material data, i.e. Young’s modulus, stress/strain data, Poisson’s ratio, Bulk modulus, density &
2. Detailed MRI images of:
• Cornea
• Sclera
• Iris
• Lens
• Suspensoryligament of lens
• Aqueous & Vitreouschambers
Cornea
Sclera
Lens
Suspensoryligament of
lens
Iris
Aqueous anterior and
posterior body
Vitreous body
Eye Model for IOP
Eye Model for IOP
• Structure of cornea:
1. Epithelium
2. Bowman's Layer (0.008-0.014mm)
3. Corneal Stroma (0.500mm)
4. Descemet's Membrane (0.005-0.010mm)
5. Endothelium
• Previous studies showed that the layered nature of cornea is important for IOP simulation of measurements
1
2
3
45
Eye Model for IOP
• Cornea – example of data
• Diagram shows stress-strain relationship of porcine corneas 24h post mortem; control, 1% and 4% glutaraldehyde treatment to stiffen the cornea
• How to obtain material data for individual layers to build the ‘composite’ model of cornea?
• GAT simulation
Eye Model for IOP
107 No initial pressure
Measured IOP: 2.6mmHg
106 with initial pressure 16.5mmHg (2.2e-3MPa)
Measured IOP: 18.2mmHg
Muscle modelling
Brian Walker, Liliana Beldie, Arup, Solihull, UKStephen Richmond, Yongtao Lu, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
Muscle modelling
• Maxillofacial surgery – a specialist surgical procedure involving the correction or rebuilding of the face following trauma or disease
• Bimaxillary Osteotomy:• Le Fort I Osteotomy of the Maxilla
• Sagittal Split Osteotomy of the Mandible
• The computer simulation of the surgery would provide:
• Tool for preoperative planning –various scenarios can be tested
• Realistic prediction of the resulting facial appearance
• The FE facial model can also be used for facial expressions and speech simulation
Muscle modelling
Temporalis
Orbicularis
Oculi
Masseter
Buccinator
Depressor
Anguli Oris
Levator Labii
Superioris Alaeque
Nasi (LLSAN)
Levator Labii
Superioris
Zygomaticus
major and minor
Orbicularis
Oris
Depressor Labii
Inferioris
Mentalis
The FE model with the muscles listed – page 1:
Risorius
Geniohyoid
Mylohyoid
Stylohyoid
Posterior
DigastricAnterior
Digastric
Hyoid bone
The FE model with the muscles listed (20) – page 2:
Medial Pterygoid
Lateral
Pterygoid
FE simulations using LS-DYNA
• Two types of analyses:
• Maxillofacial osteotomy – the maxilla and mandible are severed and repositioned; the muscles are non active during this simulation
• Facial expressions – user defined material to capture the muscle contraction
• Muscle – active, non-linear, anisotropic and viscoelastic
• Hill’s three-element model proposed in 1938 still used today, based on frog sartorius muscle:
CE
PE
SEE
FMFM
fv(λ˙f)ft(t)
L
PE = Parallell (passive) element
SE = Serial element
CE = Contractile (active) element
ft(t) = Activation function
fλ(λf) = Force-stretch
function
fv(λ˙f) = Force-velocity function
fλ(λf)
Constitutive muscle model
PE
CESE
Isometric Contraction(constant muscle length):
- CE shortens- SE lengthens and - PE is constant
Concentric contraction(muscle shortening):
- CE, SE and PE shorten
CESE
PE
Constitutive muscle model
Constitutive muscle model
• The mechanical property of an incompressible transversally isotropic soft tissue is uniquely determined by its strain energy density, from which the stress-strain relationship can be calculated
• Strain energy proposed for active quasi-compressible fibre-enforced and
hyperelastic muscle (J.A.C.Martins et al. 1998):
)()()( 1 JUUIUU Jff
C
I ++= λ
Where: (isotropic matrix)
(muscle fibre)
(volume change)
( ) ( )[ ]{ }13expC
1
C
1 −−= IbcIU I
( ) ( )21
1−= J
DJU J
),()(),,( sfSEfPEsaff UUU λλλλαλ +=∆
Withwhere stretch ratio in PE
in un-deformed config.
where is stretch ratio in SE
−
= ∫,0
,)1(4)( 1
2
0
f
dU f
m
fPE
λ
λλσλ
otherwise
1for >fλ
λβλλλ λα
deUf
s
sfSE ∫ −= −
1
)1(]1[),(
fλ
sλ
fλ
Constitutive muscle model (Meier & Blickhan 2000)
passiveσ lengthvelocityactivationactive σσσσ ++=
• The FE model of skeletal muscle can be created as the sum of the passive
and the active contribution
• The passive muscle is a hyperelastic rubber-like material when extended
• The stress in the active muscle can be formulated as a sum:
changevolumeisometricactivepassivetotal _σσσσσ +++=
• User Defined muscle material model for LS-DYNA
• The FE constitutive model of the muscle is active, quasi-incompressible, fibre-enforced and hyperelastic
Constitutive muscle model
Passive elongation Activated elongation
• A couple of validation results shown below
• Comparison to test results from Davis et al (2002) and Myers et al (1998) for rabbit Tibialis Anterior muscle
Constitutive muscle modelE
ngin
ee
rin
g S
tre
ss (
Pa
)
En
gin
ee
rin
g S
tre
ss (
Pa
)
Engineering Strain (%)Engineering Strain (%)
Disgust
Pre-surgery Post-surgery
Pre-surgery Post-surgery
Smile
Maxillofacial osteotomy – FE simulation
• Maxilla 5.0mm Forward & 4.0mm Up
• Mandible 8mm Rearward & 4.0mm Up
Maxillofacial osteotomy – FE simulation
• Maxilla 5.0mm Forward & 4.0mm Up
• Mandible 8mm Rearward & 4.0mm Up
Maxillofacial osteotomy – Comparison FE simulation vs. Patient
images 6 month Post-surgery using Geomagic Qualify 10
Summary
• The area of computer simulations in biomechanics is increasing rapidly with the advances in:
• Computational power
• Imaging techniques
• Limiting factor is the quality of reliable biological material data
• Limited in-vivo data available
• More constitutive material models needed
• Limited human data available
• Material data is patient specific and changes with:
• Age
• Gender
• Race
• Medical condition
Summary
• However, these limitations should not prevent us moving the technology forward; useful results are being obtained using data derived from other sources:
• Animal data
• Extrapolation of existing data
• Sensitivity studies using a range of parametric variations on the values used
• More accurate data will be obtained as the technology progresses
Thank you