the effects of heme from hemolyzed matrix on the stability...
TRANSCRIPT
THE EFFECTS OF HEME FROM HEMOLYZED MATRIX ON THE STABILITY OF
OCTREOTIDE IN K2 EDTA PLASMA
William Arthur Altizer
A Thesis Submitted to the
University of North Carolina Wilmington in Partial Fulfillment
of the Requirements for a the degree of
Master of Science
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry
University of North Carolina Wilmington
2012
Approved by
Advisory Committee
John Tyrell Scott Wright
James Reeves
Chair
Accepted by
_______________________
Dean, Graduate School
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................... iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................... iv
LIST OF TABLES ...........................................................................................................................v
LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................................... vi
INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................1
METHODS ......................................................................................................................................6
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ....................................................................................................30
CONCLUSIONS............................................................................................................................60
LITERATURE CITED ..................................................................................................................62
iii
ABSTRACT
An issue during blood collection for drug analysis is that the membranes of the red blood
cells can be damaged and leak their contents into the collected specimen. Hemoglobin, one of
the components of red blood cells, is comprised of four globular protein subunits and inside each
subunit is a protein chain tightly associated with a non-protein heme group. The free heme
compounds or free iron Fe (II) from the ruptured red blood cells could interact with other
components found in the collected specimen. This research was done to see if the drug
octreotide would be affected by the presence of hemolyzed matrix and in particular heme. The
results of this research showed that in the plasma treated with the anticoagulant dipotassium
ethylenediaminetetraacetate (K2 EDTA) octreotide was stable, for up to three hours, when
hemolyzed matrix or heme was added to a prepared sample. The research also looked at the
stability of octreotide in solutions containing certain metals. The metals aluminum, iron, and zinc
reduced the amount of recovered octreotide.
iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I want to extend my thanks to my wife Tamara who has helped to keep me going during
the process of working towards my Masters Degree. To my parents and my son, Liam, thank
you for being so supportive during these past few years.
To Pharmaceutical Product Development, LLC (PPD) I want to say that I appreciate the
opportunity that they have opened up for their employees to give them the chance to further their
education. Also to Dr. Scott Wright who has been my mentor for the program at PPD I want to
extend my thanks for the encouragement and guidance.
To Dr. John Tyrell thank you for your support and encouragement during my time in the
program. I really appreciate your dedication to seeing that the students in the program are
successful in not only completing the program, but asking feedback so that that the program can
better serve future students.
I also want to thank the University of North Carolina Wilmington for putting forth a
distance education program for Master of Science degree in chemistry. Without this wonderful
opportunity I may never have found the time to continue my education.
v
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
1. The high pressure liquid chromatography gradient program used for the analysis of octreotide
samples ...........................................................................................................................................23
2. The high pressure liquid chromatography gradient program used for the second octreotide
sample analysis method .................................................................................................................24
3. The standard electrode potentials of aluminum, copper, iron, and zinc ........................................28
4. A fourfold dilution of an octreotide sample in four different matrix combinations ......................33
5. A serial dilution of samples with octreotide and octreotide internal standard to eliminate
hemolyzed whole blood matrix effects on solid phase extraction. ..............................................34
6. Incubation of octreotide in matrix for 0 and 3 hours at room temperature and 37⁰C ....................36
7. Incubation of octreotide IS in matrix for 0 and 3 hours at room temperature and 37⁰C ...............37
8. Octreotide and octreotide internal standard samples were treated with hemin, heme, sodium
dithionite, Fe II or Fe III to show that octreotide and its internal standard are stable during a 1
hour room temperature incubation with these compounds ............................................................38
9. 10 ng/mL octreotide in 20:80 acetonitrile/water with 0.1% formic acid samples treated with
0.3mM aluminum, copper, iron, or zinc. Only the samples treated with zinc displayed a loss
of octreotide ...................................................................................................................................39
10. The 500ng/mL concentration of octreotide is converted to micromoles (µM) and compared to
the 300 µM concentration of the metals to show the ratio between octreotide and the metals. ....40
11. 10 ng/mL octreotide in 20:80 acetonitrile/water with 0.1% formic acid samples treated with
aluminum, copper, iron, or zinc after being stored in a refrigerator for 13 days ...........................54
12. Masses of the amino acids and metals involved in the research ....................................................59
vi
LIST OF FIGURES
Table Page
1. Structure of Octreotide .....................................................................................................................1
2. Structure of Somatostatin .................................................................................................................2
3. Picture of unhemolyzed matrix and three different levels of hemolysis .........................................3
4. Structure of Heme ............................................................................................................................4
5. Structure of Artemisinin ..................................................................................................................5
6. A diagram of a standard solid phase extraction cartridge. ...............................................................7
7. An example of solid phase extraction ............................................................................................10
8. Examples of analytical, narrow bore, and capillary HPLC columns .............................................11
9. The structure for the steroids Estradiol and Equilin-d ...................................................................13
10. Schematics of 4 basic pore types used in HPLC stationary phase .................................................14
11. A representation of an injector valve in the load, where the sample is place inside the loop.
When the valve switches to the inject position the sample is washed off of the loop into the
HPLC liquid stream .......................................................................................................................15
12. An example of a basic HPLC setup ...............................................................................................16
13. A representation of a single quadrupole mass spectrometer ..........................................................17
14. Quadrupole images, the left side image is looking down the barrel of the quadrupoles and
the right image is a side view of ion oscillating down the quadrupoles ........................................18
15. The schematic shows a simplified view of the LC/MS/MS analysis of a sample .........................19
16. A display of a mass spectrometry scan where the intensity is displayed on the y-axis as
counts per second (cps), and the mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) is displayed on the x-axis ...............20
17. A total ion HPLC-MS chromatogram where the intensity is displayed on the y-axis as counts
per second (cps), and the time is displayed on the x-axis in minutes ............................................21
18. Octreotide in plasma treated with hemolyzed whole blood at 3 different incubation times..........30
vii
19. Octreotide internal standard in plasma treated with hemolyzed whole blood at 3 different
incubation times. ............................................................................................................................31
20. Octreotide in plasma treated with non-hemolyzed whole blood at 3 different incubation times. .31
21. Octreotide internal standard in plasma treated with non-hemolyzed whole blood at 3 different
incubation times. ............................................................................................................................32
22. Q1 scan of the 500ng/mL octreotide control sample in 20:80 acetonitrile/water with 0.1%
formic acid .....................................................................................................................................40
23. Q1 scan of a 500ng/mL octreotide sample in 20:80 acetonitrile/water with 0.1% formic acid
treated with aluminum ...................................................................................................................41
24. Q1 scan of a 500ng/mL octreotide sample in 20:80 acetonitrile/water with 0.1% formic acid
treated with copper .........................................................................................................................42
25. Q1 scan of a 500ng/mL octreotide sample in 20:80 acetonitrile/water with 0.1% formic acid
treated with iron .............................................................................................................................43
26. Q1 scan of a 500ng/mL octreotide sample in 20:80 acetonitrile/water with 0.1% formic acid
treated with zinc .............................................................................................................................44
27. High pressure liquid chromatography analysis of the 500ng/mL octreotide control sample in
20:80 acetonitrile/water with 0.1% formic acid .............................................................................46
28. High pressure liquid chromatography analysis of a 500ng/mL octreotide sample in 20:80
acetonitrile/water with 0.1% formic acid treated with aluminum ..................................................47
29. High pressure liquid chromatography analysis of a 500ng/mL octreotide sample in 20:80
acetonitrile/water with 0.1% formic acid treated with iron ...........................................................48
30. High pressure liquid chromatography analysis of a 500ng/mL octreotide sample in 20:80
acetonitrile/water with 0.1% formic acid treated with zinc ...........................................................49
31. A scan of mass 410 to 620 from the time point of 1 to 1.6 minutes for the octreotide control
sample ............................................................................................................................................50
32. A scan of mass 410 to 620 from the time point of 1 to 1.6 minutes for octreotide treated with
iron .................................................................................................................................................51
33. A scan of mass 410 to 620 from the time point of 1 to 1.6 minutes for octreotide treated with
zinc .................................................................................................................................................52
34. A scan of mass 410 to 620 from the time point of 1 to 1.6 minutes for octreotide treated with
aluminum .......................................................................................................................................53
viii
35. A full scan from the time point of 0.85 to 1.1 minutes of the HPLC analysis of octreotide
treated with aluminum after a thirteen day incubation ..................................................................55
36. A full scan from the time point of 0.85 to 1.1 minutes of the HPLC analysis of octreotide
treated with iron after a thirteen day incubation ............................................................................56
37. A full scan from the time point of 0.85 to 1.1 minutes of the HPLC analysis of octreotide
treated with zinc after a thirteen day incubation ............................................................................57
38. Full scan from the time points of 0.86 to 1.22 minutes of the HPLC analysis of the octreotide
control sample after a thirteen day incubation ...............................................................................58
INTRODUCTION
Octreotide, H-D-Phe-Cyc-Phe-D-Trp-Lys-Thr-Cyc-Thr-ol, Figure 1, [1] is a synthetic
analog of the octapeptide hormone somatostatin [2] which is a growth hormone-inhibiting
hormone (GHIH). Somatostatin, Figure 2, regulates the endocrine system and affects
neurotransmission and cell proliferation by interacting with G-protein-coupled somatostatin
receptors and is involved in the release and inhibition of many secondary hormones. Octreotide
is a more potent inhibitor of insulin, growth hormones and glucagon than the naturally occurring
somatostatin. The salt form of octreotide, octreotide acetate, is the FDA approved form of this
peptide and is what is available commercially to patients.
Figure 1: Octreotide [3]
2
Figure 2: Somatostatin [4]
During clinical trials, blood specimens are drawn from patients at several time intervals
after the drug has been administered. The data from this analysis can then be used to determine
how quickly a drug enters the bloodstream and how long it takes the body to metabolize the drug
and remove it from the bloodstream. Once the specimens are drawn, they are centrifuged to
separate the red blood cells, platelets, serum and the plasma layer. Samples from the plasma
layer were used in this research. Sometimes when specimens are drawn they are mishandled
and the red blood cells are damaged prior to being centrifuged causing their cellular components
to leak out into the rest of the collected specimen. This process is called hemolysis [5] and some
of the causes in specimen mishandling are: blood being drawn too vigorously into a syringe, the
needle diameter is too restrictive for blood flow, or the specimen is shaken or vortexed too
vigorously prior to centrifugation. As shown in Figure 3, moderate or greater hemolysis can be
3
easily confirmed if the normally yellow colored plasma specimen has a pink or even reddish hue,
but even minor amounts of hemolysis that are not visible to the unaided eye will result in trace
increases in enzymes levels in samples. [6]
Figure 3: The left tube is an unhemolyzed specimen and the tubes on the right display an
increasingly higher percentage of hemolysis. [7]
This research was done to see if the peptide octreotide is affected by the presence of
hemolyzed matrix and in particular by the presence of heme, a component of hemoglobin.
Hemoglobin comprises about 35% of the total volume of the components within a red blood cell.
It is comprised of four globular protein subunits; each comprised of a protein chain tightly bound
to a non-protein heme molecule. Heme, Figure 4, is comprised of a single iron ion, Fe (II), at the
center of an organic heterocyclic ring called a porphyrin.
4
Figure 4: Heme [8]
When a cell membrane is ruptured, its contents leak out into the rest of the specimen and
can cause one of three issues:
1. The extra material escaping from the ruptured cells can change the overall concentration
of the sample by dilution [9]. If the compound of interest is found in higher
concentrations in plasma, then when the cell membrane is ruptured the sample will
become diluted and the analytical results will be lower. If the compound is found inside
the blood cells then the analytical results may be higher because when the cell membrane
is ruptured more of the drug will be available for analysis.
2. The released material from hemolysis can increase the absorbance in the short
wavelength range. Analytical results that rely on photometric measurements may have
an increase in the detected signal leading to erroneous data.
3. Some chemical reactions can be affected by the presence of the hemoglobin and in other
cases the actual chemical tests can be effected [10].
5
In a paper by Zhang and Gerhard [11], the authors noted that heme reduced the
endoperoxide bridge within artemisinin, Fig 5, and caused the activation of the drug. Heme
(Fe2+
protoporphyrin-IX) was more efficient in the reduction than inorganic iron or hemoglobin.
Because sulfur is a VIA element like oxygen and forms double bonds and hydrogen bonding in
the same manner, the reduction observed with the endoperoxide bridge could be possible with
disulfide bonds in other compounds. This research was designed to see if the disulfide bond in
octreotide would be affected like artemisinin’s endoperoxide bridge.
Figure 5: Artemisinin [12]
6
METHODS
Octreotide acetate was procured from Sequoia Research Products and the internal
standard (IS) octreotide [13
C6Phe3] was procured from Pharmaceutical Product Development.
HPLC grade methanol and acetonitrile were purchased from Burdick and Jackson. Ammonium
hydroxide (30%) and potassium hydroxide (86%) were purchased from J.T. Baker. Formic acid
and phosphoric acid were purchased from Mallinckrodt. The reagent water used was filtered by
the in house Millipore system. The Isolute-96 100mg C18 (EC) SPE plate was purchased from
Varian. An Acquity UPLC BEH C18 vanguard pre-column, 2.1mm x 5mm, 1.7 µm, product
number 186003975 and an Acquity UPLC BEH C18 vanguard pre-column, 2.1mm x 100mm,
1.7 µm (product number 186002352) were purchased from Waters. Iron powder (product
number 44890), zinc powder (product number 14409), aluminum powder (product number
214752), iron (II) chloride tetrahydrate (product number 220299), iron (III) chloride (product
number 157740), hemin (product number 51280), sodium dithionite (product number), and
protoporphyrin-IX (product number) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. The copper wire
(product number 31284) was purchased from Riedel-deHaën.
The HPLC equipment used was an Agilent 1200 series binary pump, a Shimadzu LC-
10AD VP series pump, and a 10 port cheminert 2 position selector valve from Valco
Instruments Company Incorporated, a hot sleeve-15L set at 50°C from Analytical Sales and
Services and an API 4000 series LC/MS/MS mass spectrometer from AB Sciex. The solid phase
extraction was automated using a Tomtec Quadra 96 Model 320 liquid-handling system.
The stock solutions were prepared at 100 µg/mL in 0.1:20:80 formic
acid/acetonitrile/water. The hemolyzed blood was made by taking the K2 EDTA whole blood
7
and freezing, thawing, vortexing, and then refreezing for three cycles to ensure that all of the cell
membranes had ruptured [7].
During the course of this research octreotide samples were prepared in matrix, human K2
EDTA plasma, and in other tests they were prepared in solution, 0.1:20:80 formic
acid/acetonitrile/water (v,v,v). The samples in matrix were prepared for mass spectrometer
analysis by separating the analyte of interest, octreotide, from the other components found in the
matrix. This separation was done by solid phase extraction [13], SPE, which is a process where
compounds suspended in a liquid are separated from the other compounds depending on their
chemical or physical properties. Each sample is extracted through an individual cartridge, Figure
6, which is made up of the reservoir, frits, sorbent bed, and luer tip. Depending on the desired
action a sorbent bed can be chosen to retain the analyte of interest and allow the unwanted
compounds to flow through, or to retain the unwanted compounds and allow the analyte of
interest to flow through the sorbent bed. In the case of this research, the chosen sorbent bed of
the cartridge, weak cation exchange, retained octreotide and allowed cleaning and then elution of
octreotide into a clean reservoir for high pressure liquid chromatography, HPLC, analysis.
Figure 6: A diagram of a standard solid phase extraction cartridge. [14]
8
There are three main types of sorbent beds [15], or stationary phases, to choose for
compound isolation and they are called: normal phase, reverse phase and ion exchange. Ion
exchange solid phase extraction is used for analytes that are charged when in solution and is
divided into four sub categories of stationary phase: strong anion, weak anion, strong cation and
weak cation. A weak cation exchange cartridge was the solid phase extraction type used for this
research.
Weak cation exchange (WCX) stationary phase is comprised of a carboxylic acid group
that is bonded to a silica surface and has a pKa of approximately 4.8 so it will be negatively
charged in a solution of at least 2 pH units above this pKa. The elution solvent for a weak cation
exchange stationary phase used to release the analyte from the stationary phase is at least 2 pH
units above the weak cation exchange pKa value. Strong cation exchange (SCX) stationary
phase is comprised of an aliphatic sulfonic acid group that is bonded to a silica surface and has a
pKa of less than 1. These are used to isolate strong cationic, pKa 14 or greater, or a weak
cationic, pKa of less than 12, compounds in matrix with a pH of a least 2 unit below the
analyte’s pKa. Elution from a strong cation exchange stationary phase is done with a solution
that has a pH of at least 2 units higher than the analytes pKa.
Strong anion exchange (SAX) stationary phase is comprised of an aliphatic quaternary
amine group that is bonded to a silica surface and has a pKa greater than 14 so that it is charged
at all pHs when in an aqueous solution. It is used to isolate weak anionic and strong ionic
compounds, and a solution with pH 2 units greater than the pKa is used as a matrix. Analytes
bound to these types of stationary phases are released by a solution at least 2 pH units below the
analytes pKa. Weak anion exchange (WAX) stationary phase is comprised of an aliphatic
9
aminopropyl group that has a pKa around 9.8. A solution of at least 2 pH units lower than the
pKa of the stationary phase is used, but the solution must also be 2 pH units above the analyte’s
pKa. Weak anion exchange is used to isolate strong and weak anions because they can be eluted
from the amine functional group by using a solution at least 2 pH units above the stationary
phase’s pKa.
Normal phase SPE uses a polar stationary phase to isolate a polar analyte suspended in a
mid to nonpolar matrix, like hexane or acetone. The retention mechanism is the interaction
between the polar groups of the analyte and the polar functional groups of the sorbent bed. The
analyte is eluted from the stationary phase by passing a solvent more polar than the original
matrix through the stationary phase.
Reverse phase SPE uses a nonpolar stationary phase to bind a mid to nonpolar analyte
suspended in a moderately polar or greater matrix. The retention mechanism is the interaction
between the carbon-hydrogen bonds of the analyte and the stationary phase. A nonpolar solvent
is used to elute the analyte from the stationary phase.
A typical solid phase extraction has four steps: conditioning, sample loading, washing
and elution, Figure 7. In the conditioning step the dry sorbent bed is treated by adding a solvent,
typically methanol, to wet the bed and penetrate the bonded phase within the sorbent bed. Then
either water, or a buffer close the composition of the sample is washed through the bed to
prepare the bonded phase. In the sample loading step, the sample is added to the reservoir and
allowed to slowly pass through the sorbent bed so that the analyte can interact with the material
and be retained. During this and all other steps the fluids are allowed to either pass through the
bed using gravity, centrifugation or by adding negative pressure to the cartridge using a vacuum
pump. The vacuum pump method was used for this research.
10
The washing step is done to remove impurities and other interfering material from the
sorbent bed without causing the analyte to be released. This washing step is typically done with
water or an organic compound that will not disrupt the interaction between the analyte and the
sorbent bed. Once washed the cartridge is moved so that the analyte may be eluted into a clean
container and the analyte is then washed from the cartridge with a solution that severs the
interaction between the analyte and the sorbent bed. Sometimes the elution solvent is not
compatible with the chosen HPLC column and the elution solvent must be removed, typically by
evaporation, and the dried sample reconstituted with a solvent more compatible for HPLC
analysis.
Figure 7: An example of solid phase extraction. The conditioning step wets the stationary phase
and prepares it for the loading phase where the analyte binds to the stationary phase. The
washing step removes impurities that might interfere with analysis after the analyte is removed
from the stationary phase during the elution step. [14]
High pressure liquid chromatography [16], HPLC, is a form of column chromatography
where a solvent is forced under high pressures of up to 6000 psi through a column that has been
11
packed with a stationary phase. By using higher pressures, smaller particle sizes can be used in
the stationary phase allowing for more interaction between the stationary phase and the
compounds suspended in a sample. The use of high pressure also allows for quicker elution
times and the compounds can be eluted in a much narrower band, increasing the sensitivity of the
assay.
There are several variants of chromatography available to separate analyte(s) from other
components within a sample following sample introduction. The chromatography variants are
normal phase, reverse phase, ion exchange, displacement, size-exclusion, and bioaffinity. The
choice of solvent, or mobile phase, and the packing material of the column determine what
variant of chromatography that is being used. The packing material and mechanisms of isolation
and elution for normal phase, reverse phase and ion exchange are similar to those used in solid
phase extraction.
Figure 8: Examples of analytical, narrow bore, and capillary HPLC columns. [17]
The other factors in high pressure liquid chromatography columns are the internal
diameter, length, particle size, pore size, temperature, and the amount of pressure applied to the
12
mobile phase. There are four categories of internal diameters, Figure 8, for high pressure liquid
chromatography columns: large, analytical, narrow-bore, and capillary. Large ID columns are
over 10 mm in diameter and are used for industrial applications. Analytical scale columns have
an internal diameter of 4.6 to 6 mm and narrow-bore columns average 1 to 2 mm in internal
diameter and are used for fluorescence and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis.
Capillary columns which are under 0.3 mm in diameter are made from fused silica capillaries
instead of stainless steel that is used in the other columns.
Column length is another factor when choosing a high pressure liquid chromatography
column because the extra amount of stationary phase allows for more interaction with the
analyte(s) being isolated. When dealing with a sample that has molecularly similar analytes the
extra amount of stationary phase can be critical. The steroids estradiol and the deuterated equilin
internal standard (equilin-d4), Figure 9, are good examples of this situation because they have the
same mass and the only differences between these two are that estradiol has an alcohol in the 17
position while equilin-d4 has a ketone at the 17 position, a double bond between the carbons at
the 7 and 8 position, and deuterium instead of hydrogen at four locations. Some assays require
the monitoring of the steroids estrone, estradiol, and equilin along with their deuterated internal
standards and this is when separation can become a critical. Separation of these compounds
requires high efficiency chromatography afforded by increased column length and/or reduced
particle size.
13
Figure 9: The structure for the steroids Estradiol and Equilin-d. [18]
The particle size of a column refers to the size of the silica beads that make up the
stationary phase. The smaller the particle size the greater the total surface area inside the column
which can improve separation, but the smaller particle size requires a greater amount of mobile
phase pressure to maintain good analyte separation across the stationary phase. Particle sizes
vary depending on the application the column is being used for, but 3 µm and 5 µm are the most
commonly used particles sizes. Columns with a particle size below 3 µm are used in ultra
performance liquid chromatography, UPLC. Columns and the pressure required for optimum
performance can reach up to 15000 psi in UPLC.
Many of the stationary phases used in high pressure liquid chromatography analysis are
porous [19], Figure 10, which means that the stationary phase has little pockets in their structure,
and these pores increase the available surface area inside the column. This increased surface
area allows for more interaction between the stationary phase and the analytes allowing for
greater separation.
14
Figure 10: Schematics of 4 basic pore types used in HPLC stationary phase; (a) totally porous,
(b) perfusion, (c) nonporous, and (d) superficially porous particles. [19]
The consistency of the pressure applied to the mobile phase by a pump is critical for the
reproducibility of a high pressure liquid chromatography assay. Many high pressure liquid
chromatography methods use more than one solution as their mobile phase and these solutions
are applied by a pump and mixed prior to entering the column. The mixture is changed slowly by
a gradient process to release the analyte from the stationary phase and allow the analyte to flow
downstream to the detector.
The efficiency of a high pressure liquid chromatography column can be improved by
raising its temperature [20] because at elevated temperatures the viscosity of liquids decrease and
the diffusion coefficient increases. The increased diffusion coefficient allows for better
interaction between the stationary phase and the analyte and can improve peak shape. This also
reduces the backpressure caused by the tightly packed stationary phase of the column which
decreases the stress on the HPLC pump, improving its efficiency.
15
Figure 11: A representation of an injector valve in the load, where the sample is place inside the
loop. When the valve switches to the inject position the sample is washed off of the loop into the
HPLC liquid stream. [21]
Using reverse-phase chromatography, the form used for this research project, the initial
composition of the mobile phase can be, for example, a mostly aqueous moderately polar solvent
that closely resembles the eluent from the solid phase extraction used to isolate the analyte from
the matrix. The sample is applied to the mobile phase stream by an injector, Figure 11, which is
a valve that allows the user to insert an aliquot of the sample into a section of tubing called a
loop when the injector is in the load position. The valve is actuated and the injector switches to
the inject position that moves the loop in line with the pump, Figure 12, and flushes the sample
downstream into the high pressure liquid chromatography column. Once the sample reaches the
column, the analyte interacts with the stationary phase and is held in place by van der Waals
forces of the carbon-hydrogen interaction. The composition of the mobile phase is slowly
changed to flush away unwanted material that has some affinity for the stationary phase, and
then the mobile phase reaches a sufficient nonpolar composition that the analyte is washed out of
the column and into the detector.
16
Figure 12: An example of a basic HPLC setup. [21]
The detector used was a quadrupole mass analyzer mass spectrometer [22] which is an
analytical instrument used to measure the mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) of charged particles. The
basic principle is to introduce a compound, which in case of the research is dissolved in a liquid
mobile phase, and ionize the chemical compounds to generate charged molecules and then
measure their mass-to-charge ratio. Once a sample is loaded into a mass spectrometer it
undergoes vaporization and the components are ionized. There are several forms of ionization
coupled to mass spectrometers, such as: electrospray ionization (ESI), atmospheric pressure
chemical ionization (APCI), fast atom bombardment (FAB), photoionization (PI), field
desorption (FD), direct analysis in real time, and secondary ion mass spectrometry. The one
used in the course of this research was electrospray ionization [23].
The ions are separated according to their mass-to-charge ratio by an electromagnetic field
generated by four circular rods, called quadrupoles, which are set in parallel to each other, Figure
17
13. The separation is done by stabilizing the trajectory of the selected mass-to-charge ratio in the
oscillating field generated by the quadrupoles, Figure 14. The opposing rods of the quadrupoles
are connected together electrically and a radio frequency is applied to each pair of the rods. Ions
that do not have the correct mass-to-charge ratio have an unstable trajectory and ultimately
collide with one of the rods and are deflected away from the detector located at the end of the
quadrupoles. The electrical potentials of the quadrupoles can be changed to allow a wide range
of mass-to-charge values to be monitored in either large groups or in succession.
Figure 13: A representation of a single quadrupole mass spectrometer. [24]
18
Figure 14: Quadrupole images, the left side image is looking down the barrel of the quadrupoles
and the right image is a side view of ion oscillating down the quadrupoles. [25]
The Sciex 4000 series mass spectrometer used for this research is a type of mass
spectrometer called a tandem mass spectrometer, or LC/MS/MS. A tandem mass spectrometer
[26], Figure 15, is capable of two rounds of mass spec isolation of particles separated by
molecular fragmentation. Three quadrupoles are aligned in a series and in the first quadrupole
(Q1) the analytes from the ion source are isolated prior to entering the second set of quadrupoles.
The second set of quadrupoles stabilizes the ions while they collide with a gas, in this case
nitrogen, causing them to fragment by collision-induced-dissociation (CID). In the third
quadrupole (Q3) the resulting fragments are sorted and the radio frequency is optimized so a
specific mass-to-charge ratio will reach the detector located just beyond the third quadrupole.
This allows for greater selectivity from a sample that may contain multiple compounds with the
19
same mass-to-charge ratio, but due to their structure they may produce different fragments.
Tandem mass spectrometry allows for much greater selectivity than the single quadrupole. Also,
researchers can deduce the structure of the initial compound by studying the fragments produced
in the collision cell. This is done by isolating the known compound mass in Q1 and after
fragmentation in the collision cell (Q2), Q3 is set to scan from the mass-to-charge ratio of the
parent compound and lower so that all the produced fragments can be found. The size and
intensities of these fragments can be then used to deduce the structure of the original compound.
Figure 15: The schematic shows a simplified view of the LC/MS/MS analysis of a sample.
http://www.thefullwiki.org/Lipidomics
At the end of the quadrupoles is a detector that records either the charge induced or the
current produced when an ion passes through or impacts the surface. These ions pass through an
electron multiplier called a Faraday cup to increase the signal received from the quadrupoles
because the amount of ions can be quite small. Once collected the signal response from the
detector can be displayed as intensity, or counts per second (cps), on the y-axis versus the mass-
to-charge ratio (m/z), on the x-axis, Figure 16. This type of spectrum only displays the total
amount of material with a specific mass-to-charge ratio in a sample, but cannot distinguish
20
multiple compounds of that ratio in the sample. Usually these types of scans do not involve
liquid chromatography prior to introduction into the mass spectrometer, but are done by a direct
infusion of a sample into the ion source.
Figure 16: A display of a mass spectrometry scan where the intensity is displayed on the y-axis
as counts per second (cps), and the mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) is displayed on the x-axis.
21
Figure 17: A total ion HPLC-MS chromatogram where the intensity is displayed on the y-axis as
counts per second (cps), and the time is displayed on the x-axis in minutes.
Figure 17 shows a display of a chromatogram in which high pressure liquid
chromatography separation is done to the sample prior to entering the ion source of the mass
spectrometer. The mass spectrometer is set to scan a specific mass or range of masses being
introduced into the ion source. The chromatogram displays the intensity (counts per second) of
what is scanned versus the duration of the scan. This allows for compounds that have the same
mass-to-charge ratio to be separated prior to entering the mass spectrometer and gives
confidence that the data represents the compound(s) intended for analysis.
22
Samples were analyzed using a procedure validated by PPD [27]. Into a 96-position,
2.0-mL, square-well, conical bottom, polypropylene plate, a 200 µL aliquot of sample in K2
EDTA human plasma was added and then into each well and 500 µL of phosphate buffer, pH 7.0
was added. Using a Tomtec automated solid phase extraction pipetting system an Isolute-96
100mg C18 (EC) SPE plate was conditioned three times with 300 µL of methanol, followed by
300 µL of reagent water, also administered three times. After each addition vacuum was applied
carefully so that the bed material did not completely dry out. The sample was then loaded onto
the SPE plate by transferring three 275 µL aliquots, and between each transfer a partial vacuum
was applied followed briefly by full vacuum.
The SPE plate was then washed three times with 300 µL of water, followed by three 200
µL treatments with 30:70 acetonitrile/water. A full vacuum was applied with each addition.
Next the sample was eluted from the SPE plate with three 300 µL additions of 2:8:90 by volume
29% ammonium hydroxide/water/methanol into a new 96-position, 2.0-mL, square-well, conical
bottom, polypropylene plate that was placed in the vacuum chamber. The eluent was evaporated
under a nitrogen stream at 45⁰C, and once dry the samples were reconstituted with 150 µL of
1:19:80 ammonium hydroxide/acetonitrile/water.
The HPLC separation was performed with an Xterra MS C18, 2.1 mm ID and 50 mm
length column using 0.5% ammonium hydroxide as mobile phase A and acetonitrile as mobile
phase B; see Table 1 for the chromatographic gradient conditions. The column was attached to a
Sciex 4000 series LC/MS/MS mass spectrometer set to positive mode electrospray ionization.
Mobile phase A, 0.5% ammonium hydroxide in water, and mobile phase B, acetonitrile, were
used for the chromatographic gradient.
23
Step
Total
Time
(min)
Flow
Rate
(µL/min)
Mobile
Phase
A (%)
Mobile
Phase
B (%)
0 0.0 300 70 30
1 0.5 300 70 30
2 1.5 300 20 80
3 2.5 300 20 80
4 2.6 300 10 90
5 3.2 300 10 90
6 3.4 300 70 30
7 5.5 300 70 30
Table 1: The high pressure liquid chromatography gradient program used for the analysis of
octreotide samples.
A second extraction procedure was used in the later experiments due to concerns with the
stability of the 2:8:90 ammonium hydroxide/water/methanol used as the elution solution for the
C18 SPE plate. Another chemist in the lab reported that she had noticed a difference in recovery
between SPE plates in a multi plate extraction session, and after some investigation it was
determined that the 2:8:90 ammonium hydroxide/water/methanol mixture could not be older than
a few hours between plate extractions or the amount recovered from the SPE plate would be
lower in the second plate. To eliminate possible bias when comparing different sample
extractions to each other, a newer extraction method that uses a WCX SPE plate with a 1%
trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) in 75:25 acetonitrile/water as the elution solution was used [28].
Into a 96-position, 2.0 mL, square-well, conical bottom, polypropylene plate, a 200 µL
aliquot of sample was added into each well, followed by 500 µL of phosphate buffer, pH 7.0 and
50 µL of 30 ng/mL internal standard working solution. Using a Tomtec automated extraction
solid phase extraction pipetting system, a WCX µElution SPE plate was conditioned with 200µL
of methanol, followed by 200 µL of reagent water. After each addition the vacuum was applied,
being careful not allow the bed material to completely dry out. The sample was then loaded onto
24
the SPE plate by transferring two 225 µL aliquots. Between each transfer a partial vacuum was
applied then the full vacuum was applied briefly.
The SPE plate was then washed twice with 200 µL with 5% ammonium hydroxide, and
then twice with 200 µL with 20:80 acetonitrile/water. A full vacuum was applied after each addition.
Next the sample was eluted from the SPE plate with 25 µL 1% TFA in 75:25 acetonitrile/water
two times into a new 96-position, 2.0 mL, square-well, conical bottom, polypropylene plate that
was placed in the vacuum chamber. The eluent was diluted with 150 µL of water through the
plate and the plate removed and the elution block was sealed and vortexed for 1 minute.
The HPLC separation was performed with an Acquity UPLC BEH C18, 2.1mm x
100mm, 1.7 µm pore size, and the column was heated to 50°C to improve efficiency. See Table 2
for the gradient program. Mobile phase A, 0.1% formic acid in water, and mobile phase B, 0.1%
formic acid in acetonitrile, were used for the chromatographic gradient. The flow from the
column was attached to a Sciex 4000 series LC/MS/MS mass spectrometer set to positive mode
electrospray ionization.
Table 2: The high pressure liquid chromatography gradient program used for the second
octreotide sample analysis method.
Samples were prepared at different concentrations of hemolyzed whole blood in plasma.
The control sample was 0% hemolyzed whole blood in plasma and had only octreotide and the
Step
Total
Time
(min)
Flow
Rate
(µL/min)
Mobile
Phase
A (%)
Mobile
Phase
B (%)
0 0.0 250 80 20
1 1 250 80 20
2 4.7 250 60 40
3 4.8 300 2 98
4 6 300 2 98
5 6.1 250 80 20
6 7.5 250 80 20
25
octreotide internal standard added. The 2% hemolyzed whole blood in plasma was used as an
example of mild hemolysis of a specimen and 20% hemolyzed whole blood in plasma was
prepared to represent the extremely hemolyzed sample. An 8% hemolyzed whole blood in
plasma was prepared to give a third data point for trending. These were compared to samples
with non-hemolyzed whole blood at the same concentrations.
Most of the experiments were done at two different temperature settings to see if room
temperature or 37°C, average human body temperature, would enhance or suppress any effects
hemolyzed blood would have on octreotide. Room temperature was chosen because most
samples are not immediately centrifuged to separate the plasma from the rest of the material in
whole blood and body temperature was used because most causes of hemolysis happen at the
time of collection and the specimens would still be warm when any effects would be caused by
the hemolyzed red blood cells. These samples at room temperature and 37°C were also
subdivided into incubation times to see if a 0 hour, or no incubation time, at these temperatures
would generate a different response than an incubation time of 3 hours. Reimers, McCann,
Cowan and Concannon [29] showed that peptides like insulin, which has disulfide bonds in its
structure, were affected by storage time, hemolysis and storage temperature but they only
reported results at room temperature and 4°C.
Another set of samples was prepared to test whether adding octreotide to the sample prior
to the introduction of hemolyzed matrix would have an effect on recovery. This was done to see
if octreotide had become protein bound in the plasma layer, protecting it from the effects of the
hemolyzed blood. Four sets of samples were prepared; 1) octreotide was added into a plasma
sample and then diluted fourfold with additional plasma, 2) octreotide was added into a plasma
sample diluted fourfold with hemolyzed whole blood, 3) octreotide was added to a mixture of
26
25% hemolyzed whole blood in plasma and the sample was diluted with additional 25%
hemolyzed whole blood in plasma, 4) octreotide was added into hemolyzed whole blood which
was then diluted fourfold with plasma. The prepared samples were allowed to equilibrate for
thirty minutes to being diluted.
The final extraction test was conducted by preparing a high concentration sample of
octreotide at 1000ng/mL in three different matrixes, K2 EDTA human plasma, 20% hemolyzed
whole blood in K2 EDTA human plasma, and 5% hemolyzed whole blood in K2 EDTA human
plasma. These were allowed to equilibrate for 1 hour at room temperature before a 0.100 mL
aliquot was taken and diluted to 1mL, a 10 fold dilution with K2 EDTA human plasma, which
was allowed to equilibrate at room temperature for 30 minutes. This sample was diluted again
10 fold with K2 EDTA human plasma and allowed to equilibrate for 30 minutes before aliquots
were taken and extracted in six replicates for the experiment.
Test samples of 10 ng/mL octreotide were prepared in K2 EDTA human plasma. Spiking
solutions of hemin were prepared at 2 mM and 4 mM in 0.05 N sodium hydroxide, also a spiking
solution of 4 mM sodium dithionite was prepared in 0.05 N sodium hydroxide. The sodium
hydroxide used for the hemin and sodium dithionite were degassed with helium prior to use and
the hemin and sodium dithionite powder was put in a 37°C vacuum oven. After an hour under
vacuum the chamber was filled with argon gas and the samples were quickly spiked with sodium
hydroxide. All of this was done to remove as much oxygen from the samples so that when the
sodium dithionite is added to the hemin it will reduce the hemin protein from an oxidized form
creating heme. Removing as much oxygen as possible from the sodium hydroxide prior to
preparing the sodium dithionite solution helped to ensure that the hemin was converted to heme.
Heme contains Fe2+
protoporphyrin-IX and it should be reactive to the disulfide bonds in
27
octreotide whereas the Fe3+
protoporphyrin-IX of hemin is in the highest oxidation for iron and is
not reactive. Also prepared were solutions of protoporphyrin IX (1.13 mg/mL), ferric chloride
(397.6 mg/mL) and ferrous chloride (324.4 mg/mL), each of these solutions were prepared at a
concentration 2mM in water. The amount of free iron found in a highly hemolyzed sample prior
to the sample being centrifuged is 860 ng/mL [6]. Because iron settles in the serum phase after
centrifugation, the amount of free iron in plasma after centrifugation is almost negligible except
in cases of rare disorders. A 1 mL aliquot of the 4 mM heme and a 1 mL of 4mM sodium
dithionite were mixed so that the sodium dithionite would convert the hemin to heme and make a
2mM (1.23 mg/mL) solution [30]. The concentration of 1.23 mg/mL is equivalent to 1%
hemolyzed blood in plasma. Six 4mL aliquots of the 10ng/mL octreotide were taken from the
pool and each was treated with one of the prepared solutions; heme, hemin, sodium dithionite,
protoporphyrin IX, ferric chloride and ferrous chloride. These solutions were allowed to
equilibrate for 1 hour at 37°C before aliquots were taken and extracted along with a control of 10
ng/mL octreotide in K2 EDTA plasma.
In an early experiment a stock solution of octreotide was found to have degraded within
two weeks of being prepared possibly because of the use of an aluminum weigh boat that was
left in the solution at the time of preparation. Upon investigation the 100 µg/mL octreotide stock
solution, which had been fresh in the first experiment, had degraded to such an extent that the
peak response was tenfold less than a freshly prepared stock. The aluminum weigh boat may
have caused a metal ion catalyzed reduction of octreotide. Erlandsson and Hällbrink (31)
observed that zinc broke the disulfide bonds in certain peptides and aluminum may be having a
similar effect on octreotide. A new stock solution, prepared using a glass weigh boat, was
28
compared to the solution that had been prepared with an aluminum weigh boat to confirm the
loss of octreotide and the new stock was used in the future experiments.
A test was done to determine if zinc II, aluminum III, copper I, copper II, or iron III
would have an effect on the recovery of octreotide in solution. A 0.49 µM intermediate solution
of octreotide in 20:80 acetonitrile/water with 0.1% formic acid was prepared and 2mL of the
intermediate was aliquoted into10mL vials. A 300 µM solution of each metal was prepared and
added to a vial. A second set of vials was prepared and to them was added 10uL of methyl
acrylate (MA), which will bind to any broken disulfide bonds preventing them from reforming.
Copper was chosen as a control metal since it has a positive standard electrode potential, Table 3,
and should not react with octreotide.
Table 3: The standard electrode potentials of aluminum, copper iron and zinc.
The solutions were vortexed and allowed to sit at room temperature for 1 hour before
being centrifuged at 4000rpm for 15 minutes. The samples were then infused directly into the
mass spectrometer and a Q1 scan was done with a scan window from 410 to 610 m/z, see figures
23-27, to see if there was any response loss at the 510 mass. Octreotide’s molecular mass is
1019.24 g/mol, but it is a dual charged molecule so the m/z (mass/charge) ratio is approximately
510 m/z.
A 0.250 mL aliquot was placed into a 96 well block and a 5uL injection was made and
the sample was separated by HPLC using an Acquity UPLC BEH C18, 1.7 µm pore size, 2.1
29
column inner diameter, and 100 cm long column. This was done to help chromatographically
separate degraded material resulting from the interaction of the metals with octreotide. The high
pressure liquid chromatography eluent was analyzed by a Q1 scan of the mass-to-charge ratio
range of 410 to 610 m/z.
The solutions were stored at 2-8˚C and were assayed again 13 days later to see if there
was any further degradation of octreotide caused by the presence of metal in the solution. The
scan window was narrowed to scan between the range of 450 to 560 m/z, see figures 28-35.
30
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Hemolyzed whole blood was added to plasma containing octreotide at different
percentages and another set of samples were created using non- hemolyzed matrix. The initial
results of comparing 0, 2, 8, and 20 % hemolyzed whole blood to the same percentages in non-
hemolyzed whole blood was promising because the samples with hemolyzed matrix showed a
definite trend in recovery loss as the percentage of hemolyzed matrix was increased, Figure 18
(octreotide), and Figure 19 (internal standard). The samples that had the same concentrations of
unhemolyzed whole blood did not show the same trend, Figure 20 (octreotide) and Figure 21
(internal standard). The incubation samples had nearly the same response in the hemolyzed and
non-hemolyzed samples except for the 0 % hemolyzed at the 3 hour incubation time which was
much higher and was determined to be a double spike of the spiking solution. The actual cause
of the recovery loss was not due to the degradation of octreotide by hemolyzed whole blood, but
likely due to the extra cellular material clogging the pores of the solid phase bed of the
extractions plates.
Figure 18: Octreotide in plasma treated with hemolyzed whole blood at 3 different incubation
times.
31
Figure 19: Octreotide internal standard in plasma treated with hemolyzed whole blood at 3
different incubation times.
Figure 20: Octreotide in plasma treated with non-hemolyzed whole blood at 3 different
incubation times.
32
Figure 21: Octreotide internal standard in plasma treated with non-hemolyzed whole blood at 3
different incubation times.
In the comparison of a fourfold dilution (dil4) of 100 ng/mL octreotide in K2 EDTA
human plasma samples that were diluted with hemolyzed blood did have a much lower recovery
than the sample prepared and diluted with plasma, Table 4. The results from where octreotide
was added to the samples containing hemolyzed whole blood were also lower than the samples
prepared completely in plasma, but not as low of a recovery as the plasma samples diluted with
hemolyzed blood, see Table 4. The expectation was that the plasma dil4 with hemolyzed and the
25% hemolyzed in plasma dil4 with additional 25% hemolyzed should have had the same
amount of recovery. Since the matrix to be added was freshly vortexed prior to addition, the
sample diluted with hemolyzed whole blood would have gotten more cellular material than the
sample with 25% hemolyzed whole blood in plasma. This additional material would have
competed with the binding sites on the solid phase bed more than the other samples. The internal
standard tracked very similarly to octreotide and the internal standard was not added until after
the 4% phosphoric acid had been added to the sample aliquots. If the hemolyzed matrix was
causing degradation of octreotide the reaction should have been stopped or at least reduced by
33
the addition of the 4% phosphoric acid, and the four different preparations should have had
internal standard responses that were more comparable. This reinforces the hypothesis that the
active sites on the stationary phase of the solid phase extraction cartridges were being blocked by
the material from the hemolyzed matrix.
Octreotide
Plasma
diluted with
plasma
(cps)
Plasma
diluted with
hemolyzed
blood (cps)
25%hemolyzed
diluted with
25%
hemolyzed
blood (cps)
Hemolyzed
blood
diluted with
plasma
(cps)
179003 45111 139738 148158
206237 70783 156629 150432
171956 56466 158523 145082
230050 53787 159712 150358
198194 52364 151775 134139
197188 67278 154440 142745
Mean 197105 57631 153469 145152
Std Dev 18842 8819 6669 5644
Octreotide
Internal
Standard
Plasma
diluted with
plasma
(cps)
Plasma
diluted with
hemolyzed
blood (cps)
25%hemolyzed
diluted with
25%
hemolyzed
blood (cps)
Hemolyzed
blood
diluted with
plasma
(cps)
85984 52612 71279 79482
99207 63309 79485 78430
80705 52757 77531 74869
112387 51070 81207 75031
93342 71712 80270 71180
94532 105900.1 79111 77145
Mean 94360 58292 78147 76023
Std Dev 10051 8004 3270 2732
Table 4: The fourfold dilution of samples containing octreotide and octreotide internal standard
in four different matrix combinations. The data point highlighted in red for the internal standard
sample of plasma diluted with hemolyzed blood was eliminated from the calculations.
34
In the test done where the samples were diluted tenfold twice to almost completely
eliminate any interference of the solid phase extraction plate by components from hemolyzed
whole blood there was no difference in the three sets of samples, Table 5. So all of the previous
results that showed a loss of recovery may have been caused by the competition of the SPE plate
binding sites between octreotide and the cellular components that were released when the whole
blood was hemolyzed. This reinforces the notion that hemolysis can have an effect on analysis,
but it does not seem to interfere with octreotide.
Octreotide
Control in
Plasma
(cps)
Octreotide
in 20%
Hemolyzed
Blood in
Plasma
(cps)
Octreotide
in 5%
Hemolyzed
Blood in
Plasma
(cps)
Octreotide
Internal
Standard
Control in
Plasma
(cps)
Octreotide
Internal
Standard in
20%
Hemolyzed
Blood in
Plasma
(cps)
Octreotide
Internal
Standard in
5%
Hemolyzed
Blood in
Plasma
(cps)
616631 633118 631952 332892 325804 311899
586831 569145 621343 313958 309688 314400
570409 569337 611432 294064 277338 308868
465233 652382 458663 227276 342586 329372
550797 549542 676180 282719 259484 313954
582153 577829 580176 297599 295712 290086
Mean 562009 591892 596624 291418 301769 311430
Std
Dev 52091 40929 74447 35953 30751 12645
Table 5: A serial dilution of samples with octreotide and octreotide internal standard to eliminate
hemolyzed whole blood matrix effects on solid phase extraction.
Samples prepared with 0%, 2%, 8% and 25% hemolyzed blood in K2 EDTA plasma
were tested at room temperature (RT) and 37°C. The two temperature settings were also
compared at two different incubations times; one was a 3 hour incubation of the samples and the
others was prepared at the two temperatures and extracted immediately, these samples were
called 0 hour. This was done to determine whether temperature and/or duration between
35
preparation and extraction would have an effect on the stability of octreotide, Table 6, and
octreotide internal standard, Table 7. The data shows that as the percentage of hemolyzed blood
increases there is a corresponding drop in the recovery of octreotide, and this is true in both the
RT and the 37⁰C samples. The 3 hour incubations for both 37⁰C and room temperature had a
higher amount of octreotide recovery.
The analysis to eliminate cellular components as a factor in the extraction was also done
to see if hemin, heme, ferrous chloride, or protoporphyrin IX would cause the degradation of
octreotide. Ferric chloride was added to the experiment as a control because that highly oxidized
state of iron should not react with octreotide. The results, Table 8, confirmed the data from the
multi-dilution test that octreotide seems to be stable in matrix when samples are treated with
hemolyzed whole blood. None of the reagents added and incubated for 1 hour caused a loss in
the recovery of octreotide. An experiment conducted by adding iron powder to octreotide in
20:80 acetonitrile/water with 0.1% formic acid was performed and when scanned by Q1 MS
analysis the immediate analysis of iron showed no loss of octreotide, but after a 13 day
incubation the iron treated sample did have a loss of octreotide. Additional testing with a longer
incubation time should be done.
36
Octreotide
25% Hemolyzed
Blood in Plasma (cps)
8% Hemolyzed
Blood in Plasma (cps)
2% Hemolyzed
Blood in Plasma (cps)
100% K2 EDTA Plasma (cps)
37°C 3Hour
Incubation
37°C 3Hour
Incubation
37°C 3Hour
Incubation
37°C 3Hour
Incubation
27649 38434 47949 65520
22995 37536 50184 67479
22748 40442 51950 68158
16394 38127 52944 57498
25228 38110 53519 64553
26495 35206 54298 63088
Mean 23585 37976 51807 64383
Std Dev 4011 1685 2365 3853
Octreotide
Room Temperature
3Hour Incubation
(cps)
Room Temperature
3Hour Incubation
(cps)
Room Temperature
3Hour Incubation
(cps)
Room Temperature
3Hour Incubation
(cps)
28734 38562 42141 58106
27557 38116 56442 61691
25402 38193 52385 65592
28100 35758 54054 52961
26190 40243 61309 57338
22796 40587 56651 57137
Mean 26463 38577 53830 58804
Std Dev 2176 1739 6473 4335
Octreotide 37°C
0 hour (cps) 37°C
0 hour (cps) 37°C
0 hour (cps) 37°C
0 hour (cps)
23743 27438 48131 41997
15345 27893 46104 51418
17725 32523 40530 49267
16892 31220 26626 48546
12393 36827 40649 51178
18839 31295 47452 45721
Mean 17490 31199 41582 48021
Std Dev 3793 3421 8043 3603
Octreotide
Room Temperature
0 hour (cps)
Room Temperature
0 hour (cps)
Room Temperature
0 hour (cps)
Room Temperature
0 hour (cps)
27632 24777 27964 48517
20298 29854 36913 49759
20771 35735 43214 46119
21615 32965 40636 52305
17318 33536 41467 48621
14761 36649 40369 45296
Mean 20399 32253 38427 48436
Std Dev 4364 4365 5524 2529
Table 6: The incubation of octreotide in matrix for 0 and 3 hours at room temperature and 37⁰C. The 3
hour incubation had higher recovery than those not incubated at 37⁰C.
37
Octreotide Internal
Standard
25%
Hemolyzed Blood in
Plasma (cps)
8% Hemolyzed Blood in
Plasma (cps)
2% Hemolyzed Blood in
Plasma (cps)
100% K2 EDTA Plasma
(cps)
37°C 3Hour
Incubation
37°C 3Hour
Incubation
37°C 3Hour
Incubation
37°C 3Hour
Incubation
17254 22724 28013 40684
14372 22922 31034 41030
13695 24615 31103 41664
9558 22244 31935 34507
15770 23594 32018 38630
15689 22300 32538 39506
Mean 14390 23066 31107 39337
Std Dev 2669 903 1621 2606
Octreotide
Internal
Standard
Room Temperature
3Hour
Incubation (cps)
Room Temperature
3Hour
Incubation (cps)
Room Temperature
3Hour
Incubation (cps)
Room Temperature
3Hour
Incubation (cps)
16983 23797 25198 35416
17646 23517 33975 36183
14487 22442 31293 39037
16058 21428 33204 32220
16071 25759 36476 34045
13703 25967 33598 35009
Mean 15825 23818 32291 35318
Std Dev 1488 1793 3852 2276
Octreotide Internal
Standard
37°C
0 hour (cps)
37°C
0 hour (cps)
37°C
0 hour (cps)
37°C
0 hour (cps)
14143 16594 28071 25372
9316 16238 28382 29934
10684 20678 24330 29222
10430 18914 16111 28517
7486 21045 23355 31696
11309 19254 28969 27113
Mean 10561 18787 24870 28642
Std Dev 2210 2011 4872 2208
Octreotide
Internal Standard
Room
Temperature 0 hour (cps)
Room
Temperature 0 hour (cps)
Room
Temperature 0 hour (cps)
Room
Temperature 0 hour (cps)
16719 14723 16855 28775
12396 18147 21632 29181
12981 21437 26907 28235
13185 19404 25149 31793
10357 20462 24742 30545
8938 21550 23238 27004
Mean 12429 19287 23087 29255
Std Dev 2675 2579 3537 1700
Table 7: The incubation of octreotide IS in matrix for 0 and 3 hours at room temperature and 37⁰C. The
3 hour incubation had higher recovery than those not incubated at 37⁰C.
38
Table 8: Octreotide and octreotide internal standard samples were treated with hemin, heme,
sodium dithionite, Fe II or Fe III to show that octreotide and its internal standard are stable
during a1 hour room temperature incubation with these compounds. All of the data is in counts
per second (cps).
In the analysis of a direct infusion into the mass spectrometer of octreotide treated with
aluminum, copper, iron or zinc, Table 9, there was no significant difference between the
octreotide control sample (Figure 23) and those containing aluminum (Figure 24), copper (Figure
25) and iron (Figure 26). Zinc (Figure 27) was the exception; there were no analyte peaks at the
510 mass. The samples treated with methyl acrylate (MA) had similar results to the same
samples that were not treated so their Q1 scans are not shown. The methyl acrylate treatment
was done to see if the disulfide bonds were broken and reforming the methyl acrylate would bind
and prevent the broken disulfide bonds from reforming. Because both the treated and untreated
39
sample had similar results this means that disulfide bonds are not being reformed after being
broken. The loss of octreotide reinforces the results described by Erlandsson and Hällbrink [31]
that the addition of metallic zinc to a sample containing a peptide with a disulfide bond causes a
recovery loss of the sample by the reduction of the disulfide bond.
Compound Peak Intensity
(cps)
Octreotide control 1.20x106
Octreotide treated with Copper 1.25 x106
Octreotide treated with Iron 1.15 x106
Octreotide treated with Zinc No visible Peak
Octreotide treated with Aluminum 1.33 x106
Octreotide control treated with Methyl Acrylate 1.40 x106
Octreotide treated with Copper and Methyl Acrylate 1.25 x106
Octreotide treated with Iron and Methyl Acrylate 1.25 x106
Octreotide treated with Zinc and Methyl Acrylate No visible Peak
Octreotide treated with Aluminum and Methyl Acrylate 1.46 x106
Table 9: 10 ng/mL octreotide in 20:80 acetonitrile/water with 0.1% formic acid samples treated
with 0.3mM aluminum, copper, iron, or zinc. Only the samples treated with zinc displayed a
loss of octreotide.
The concentration of 300 µM for the metals was selected to reproduce what was done by
Erlandsson and Hällbrink [27] with zinc. When converted, Table 10, from ng/mL to micromolar
octreotide is 600 times less than the concentration of the metals. A future experiment could be
done with lower concentrations of the metals to see what the minimal ratio of metal to octreotide
is needed to have complete loss of octreotide.
40
Metal
Atomic
Weight
(g/mol)
Amount
(mg)
Final
Volume
(mL)
Concentration
(µM)
Copper 63.55 0.0762 2 300
Iron 55.85 0.075 2 300
Zinc 65.38 0.0785 2 300
Aluminum 26.98 0.0324 2 300
Octreotide 1019.26 1.0009 2 0.491
Table 10: The 500ng/mL concentration of octreotide is converted to micromoles/L (µM) and
compared to the 300 µM concentration of the metals to show the ratio between octreotide and the
metals.
Figure 22: Q1 scan of the 500ng/mL octreotide control sample in 20:80 acetonitrile/water with
0.1% formic acid.
41
Figure 23: Q1 scan of a 500ng/mL octreotide sample in 20:80 acetonitrile/water with 0.1%
formic acid treated with aluminum.
42
Figure 24: Q1 scan of a 500ng/mL octreotide sample in 20:80 acetonitrile/water with 0.1%
formic acid treated with copper.
43
Figure 25: Q1 scan of a 500ng/mL octreotide sample in 20:80 acetonitrile/water with 0.1%
formic acid treated with iron.
44
Figure 26: Q1 scan of a 500ng/mL octreotide sample in 20:80 acetonitrile/water with 0.1%
formic acid treated with zinc.
When the samples were analyzed by high pressure liquid chromatography, octreotide
which has a column retention time of 3.61 minutes, the control sample’s (Figure 27) peak height
was comparable to the peak heights of the sample treated with copper and aluminum (Figure 28),
which means that copper and aluminum caused no degradation to octreotide during the short
incubation time. All three samples had peak height responses between 4.0e7 and 5.0e7. In the
sample treated with iron (Figure 29) the peak height was 1.15e6 and the sample treated with zinc
(Figure 30) had no discernable peak at the retention time of 3.61 minutes. In the iron and zinc
45
treated samples there was an additional peak that appeared in the window between 1 and 1.6
minutes that did not appear in the other three samples. The loss of octreotide in the sample
treated with zinc reinforces the results describe by Erlandsson and Hällbrink [31] that the
addition of metallic zinc to a sample containing a peptide with a disulfide bond causes the
reduction of the disulfide bond. In the full Q1 scan a large peak appears at 1 minute in the zinc
and iron samples that does not appear in the others; this peak is 9 times higher in zinc that it is in
the iron sample. This shows that there is some metal related degradation caused by zinc. The
methyl acrylate addition did not result in any more loss in response when compared to the
samples not treated with methyl acrylate, so the effect caused by the addition of zinc is breaking
the disulfide bonds in a manner that is not allowing them to reform.
46
Figure 27: High pressure liquid chromatography analysis of the 500ng/mL octreotide control
sample in 20:80 acetonitrile/water with 0.1% formic acid. The retention time of the octreotide
peak is 3.61 minutes.
47
Figure 28: High pressure liquid chromatography analysis of a 500ng/mL octreotide sample in
20:80 acetonitrile/water with 0.1% formic acid treated with aluminum. The retention time of the
octreotide peak is 3.61 minutes.
48
Figure 29: High pressure liquid chromatography analysis of a 500ng/mL octreotide sample in
20:80 acetonitrile/water with 0.1% formic acid treated with iron. The retention time of the
octreotide peak off of the column is 3.60 minutes.
49
Figure 30: High pressure liquid chromatography analysis of a 500ng/mL octreotide sample in
20:80 acetonitrile/water with 0.1% formic acid treated with zinc. There is not octreotide peak at
the expected retention time of 3.61 minutes. At 1.12 minutes is a peak not seen in the control
sample.
50
Figure 31: High pressure liquid chromatography analysis of the 500ng/mL octreotide control
sample. The upper panel is same one from Figure 27 and the lower panel is the scan of all
masses from 410 to 610 m/z within the time points of 1.02 to 1.61 minutes which are highlighted
in the upper panel. The peaks observed in the lower panel are nothing more than background
noise averaging 1.2e4 (cps) in height.
In the split screen of Figure 31, the upper window is the same one seen in Figure 27 and
the lower window is the scan of of all peaks between the masses of 410 and 610 m/z during this
1 to 1.6 minutes window. This scan of octreotide is a baseline to compare against the samples
treated with iron (Figure 32) and zinc (Figure 33) and the large peak observed in those samples.
In the iron treated sample the scan gave clusters of multiple charged species that are likely the
result of a breakdown of octreotide into smaller amino acid chains. This is plausible because no
51
other compounds besides octreotide, iron and the solvent 20:80 acetonitrile/water with 0.1%
formic acid were present. The zinc treated sample had a similar result but the clusters were
fewer than iron and had more intense peak heights, meaning there were more of those masses
present in the sample. Finally, aluminum (Figure 34) and copper had the same chromatogram as
the octreotide control, meaning that there had been no reaction with octreotide.
Figure 32: High pressure liquid chromatography analysis of a 500ng/mL octreotide sample
treated with iron. The upper panel is same one from Figure 29 and the lower panel is the scan all
masses from 410 to 610 m/z within the time points of 1.02 to 1.61 minutes which are highlighted
in the upper panel. The peaks observed in the lower panel show several small clusters of masses.
52
Figure 33: High pressure liquid chromatography analysis of a 500ng/mL octreotide sample
treated with zinc. The upper panel is same one from Figure 30 and the lower panel is the scan all
masses from 410 to 610 m/z within the time points of 1.02 to 1.61 minutes which are highlighted
in the upper panel. The peaks observed in the lower panel show a few clusters of possibly multi-
charged particles.
53
Figure 34: High pressure liquid chromatography analysis of a 500ng/mL octreotide sample
treated with aluminum. The upper panel is same one from Figure 28 and the lower panel is the
scan all masses from 410 to 610 m/z within the time points of 1.02 to 1.61 minutes which are
highlighted in the upper panel. There are no clusters of peaks observed in this sample.
After 13 days the samples were reanalyzed and the samples with copper showed only
minimal change when compared to the control sample. The samples with iron, which had
oxidized into a rusty slurry, zinc and aluminum all had no analyte response at the 510 mass,
Table 11.
54
(cps)
Control 1.60 x106
Copper 1.34 x106
Iron 0
Zinc 0
Aluminum 0
Control with MA 1.40 x106
Copper with MA 1.50 x106
Iron with MA 0
Zinc with MA 0
Table 11: LCMS chromatographic responses of the peak at 3.19 minutes of 10 ng/mL
octreotide in 20:80 acetonitrile/water with 0.1% formic acid samples treated with aluminum,
copper, iron, or zinc after being stored in a refrigerator for 13 days.
The aluminum treated sample (Figure 36) that had been stored in a refrigerator for 13
days did not have a peak at the retention time of 3.19 minutes, but did have a peak between the
time points of 0.5 to 1.16 minutes that was not present on day 1, see Figure 34. The retention
time difference between day 1 and day 13 were attributed to a new analytical column. When
examined the early peak did show some new masses that were not in the day 1 sample, but not
the same intensity as those in the iron (Figure 37) and zinc (Figure 38) treated samples when
compared to the octreotide control sample (Figure 39). It could be that when aluminum reacted
with the octreotide peptide it broke the molecule differently than iron or zinc, explaining the
different cluster masses. Mantyh, et al [32] found that the metals aluminum, iron and zinc
promoted the aggregation of the peptide β-Amyloid, a large peptide of 36 to 43 amino acids
commonly associated with Alzheimer’s disease; octreotide is only an 8 amino acid peptide.
55
Figure 35: High pressure liquid chromatography analysis of octreotide treated with aluminum
after a 13 day incubation. The upper panel is a Total ion count (TIC) Q1 scan and the lower
panel is the scan all masses from 460 to 560 m/z within the time points of 0.63 to 1.16 minutes
which are highlighted in the upper panel. There are no clusters of peaks observed in this sample.
There is no observed octreotide peak at 3.19 minutes in the upper panel.
56
Figure 36: High pressure liquid chromatography analysis of octreotide treated with iron after a
13 day incubation. The upper panel is a Total ion count (TIC) Q1 scan and the lower panel is the
scan all masses from 460 to 560 m/z within the time points of 0.85 to 1.20 minutes which are
highlighted in the upper panel. There are clusters of peaks observed in this sample. There is no
observed octreotide peak at 3.19 minutes in the upper panel.
57
Figure 37: High pressure liquid chromatography analysis of octreotide treated with zinc after a
13 day incubation. The upper panel is a Total ion count (TIC) Q1 scan and the lower panel is the
scan all masses from 460 to 560 m/z within the time points of 0.84 to 1.14 minutes which are
highlighted in the upper panel, and there are clusters of possible multi-charged particle observed
in this sample. There is no observed octreotide peak at 3.19 minutes in the upper panel.
58
Figure 38: High pressure liquid chromatography analysis of the octreotide control sample after
a 13 day incubation. The upper panel is a Total ion count (TIC) Q1 scan and the lower panel is
the scan all masses from 460 to 560 m/z within the time points of 0.86 to 1.22 minutes which are
highlighted in the upper panel and there are some peaks observed in this sample. There is an
octreotide peak at 3.19 minutes in the upper panel.
59
Abbreviation Name mass (g/mol)
Phe Phenylalanine 165.19
Cys Cysteine 121.16
Trp Tryptophan 204.23
Lys Lysine 146.19
Thr Threonine 119.12
Al Aluminum 26.98
Cu Copper 63.55
Fe Iron 55.85
Zn Zinc 65.38
Table 12: Masses of the amino acids and metals involved in the research.
60
CONCLUSIONS
The objective of this research was to determine if the presence of hemolyzed blood and
more specifically the released heme from hemolyzed blood, in a plasma sample preserved with
K2 EDTA would have a detrimental effect on the structural stability of the peptide octreotide.
The results indicate that octreotide is structurally stabile in the presence of both hemolyzed
matrix and heme for an exposure of up to 3 hours before the samples are put through a solid
phase extraction for analysis. The presence of hemolyzed matrix was found to have an adverse
effect on the recovery of octreotide by solid phase extraction unless pre-treatment was done to
the samples to mitigate the competitive binding of the active sites of stationary phase of the SPE
cartridges.
Octreotide stability was found to be effected by the presence of metals like aluminum,
iron, and zinc. It is possible that these metals are binding with octreotide and changing its mass
to charge ratio so that it not being found in the expected scanning window. Another possibility is
that the metals are causing a breakdown of the peptide structure creating smaller peptides that
have a different mass to charge ratio so that they would not be found in the expected scanning
window.
Further research regarding the effect of heme or hemolyzed matrix on the stability of
octreotide should consider the long term storage issue. Because we now know that when stored
in solution in a refrigerator for nearly two weeks there is no loss in octreotide, current tests could
be extended to look for long term loss of octreotide in matrix. These tests would be done in
refrigeration and -20°C, the standard storage temperature for octreotide in matrix. These tests
could also be run with heme, hemin, protoporphyrin, and Fe2+ to see if a longer duration of
storage and temperature would have an effect.
61
Another question for further research is to find out whether the metals are reducing
octreotide into smaller chains or forming different sized clusters that are capable of having
multiple charge states. It is likely that both are occurring and that the metals are breaking down
the peptide structure and/or binding with the resulting pieces to form new structures. This
breakdown and/or formation of clusters would explain the loss of octreotide and the formation of
different masses for each metal. Calculations do not match a simple disulfide breakage and
metal ion complex, so it is likely that other bonds are being broken and complexes are forming
with the available metal ions. Looking at the masses of the amino acids and metals involved,
Table 12, reinforces this explanation. The scan masses considered would have to be extended
from approximately 250 m/z to approximately 1200 m/z, the limit of the API4000.
Another option would be to check the samples every 24 hours after the introduction of
metal to put together a profile of degradation caused by the introduction of metal. These profiles
could be run at the storage temperature of 4°C, -20°C and -80°C to see if temperature would
slow down the degradation caused by the metals. The reaction with zinc was very rapid, but iron
and aluminum took hours or even days to completely break down octreotide. Also, the amount
of metal needed to cause the loss of octreotide needs further study. The molar amount of the
metals was over 600 times greater than octreotide. By varying the concentrations of the metal
we could determine if there is a minimal amount needed to cause a loss of octreotide, and if there
is a saturation level where more metal will not cause an increase in the rate of octreotide loss.
62
LITERATURE CITED
1. Brown, N.J., American Journal of Medical Science, 1990. Oct, 300 (4), pp 267-273.
2. Brazeua, P., Vale, W., Burgus, R., Ling, N., Butcher, M., Rivier, J., Guillemin, R.,
Science, 1973, Vol. 179, No. 4068, pp. 77-79.
3. Ghassemi, A. H., van Steenbergen, M. J., Barendregt, A., Talsma, H., Kok, R. J., van
Nostrum, C. F., Crommelin, D. J. A., Hennink, W. E. Pharmaceutical Research, 2012
January; 29(1): 110-120.
4. http://www.lookchem.com/cas-511/51110-01-1.html
5. Carroro, P., Servidio, G., Plebani, M., Clinical Chemistry, 2000, Vol. 46, No 2, pp. 306-
308.
6. Frank, J.J., Bermes, E.W., Bickel, M.J., Watkins, B.F., Clinical Chemistry, 1978, Vol. 24,
No. 11, pp. 1966-1970.
7. http://www.cdha.nshealth.ca/pathology-laboratory-medicine/clinical-chemistry/hemolysis
8. Voet, D., Voet, J. G., Biochemistry, 1990, John Wiley and Sons, Inc, pp 542,.
9. Caraway, W.T., American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1962, 37, pp. 445-464.
10. Pai, S. H., Cry-Manthey, M., Clinical Chemistry, 1991, 22, No. 6, pp. 408-410.
11. Zhang, S., Gerhard, G.S., Biorganic and Medicinal Chemistry, 2008, 16, pp. 7853-7861.
12. Meshnick, S.R., Taylor, T.E., Kamchonwongpaisan, S., Microbiological Reviews, June
1996, pp. 301-315.
13. Simpson, N.J.K., Solid-Phase Extraction: Principles, Techniques, and Application, 2000,
Marcel Dekker, Inc.
14. http://www.biotage.com/DynPage.aspx?id=35833
15. Thurman, E.M., Mills, M.S., Solid-Phase Extraction: Principles and Practice, 1998,
Wiley-Interscience.
16. Snyder, L.R., Kirkland, J.J., Dolan, J.W., Introduction to Modern Liquid
Chromatography, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2009.
17. http://www.analytical-sales.com/HPLC_Columns.html
63
18. Creegan, J.A., Hidy, B.J., PPD Method, LCMSC233 Version 1.00, 2002.
19. Majors, R.E., LCGC, 2004, Vol. 1, No. 1.
20. Antia, F.D., Horváth, C., Journal of Chromatography A, 1988, Vol. 435, pp. 1-15.
21. www.lcresources.com/resources
22. Chapman, J.R., Practical Organic Mass Spectrometry, 1986, John Wiley & Sons,
Chichester, England.
23. Fenn, J.B., Mann, M., Meng, C.K., Wong, S.F., Whitehouse, C.M., Science, 1989, Vol.
246, No. 4926, pp. 64-71.
24. http://www.files.chem.vt.edu/chem-ed/ms/quadrupo.html
25. http://www.analyticalspectroscopy.net/ap8-23.htm
26. Yost, R.A., Enke, C.G., Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1978, Vol. 100, No.
7, pp. 2274-2275.
27. Hidy, B.J., PPD Method, LCMSC296 Version 1.01, 2006.
28. Ismaiel, O.A., Zhang, T., Hidy, B.J., PPD Method, LCMSC296 Version 2.01, 2009.
29. Reimers, T.J., McCann, J.P., Cowan, R.G., Concannon, P.W., Proceedings of the Society
for Experimental Biology and Medicine, 1982, 170, pp. 509-516.
30. Di Iorio, E., Methods in Enzymology, 1981, Vol. 76, pp. 57-72.
31. Erlandsson, M., Hällbrink, M., International Journal of Peptide Research and
Therapeutics, 2005, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 261-265.
32. Mantyh, P.W., Ghilardi, J.R., Rogers, S., DeMaster, E., Allen, C.J., Stimson, E.R.,
Maggio, J.E., Journal of Neurochmeistry, 1993, Vol. 61, No. 3, pp. 1171-1174.