the aerodynamic. drag of near earth...

52
MINISTRY. OF AVIATION AEROl$AUTlCAL RESEARCH COUNCIL CURRENT PAPERS The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook LONDON: HER MAJESTY’S STATIONERY OFFICE PRICE6s. 6d. NET

Upload: others

Post on 02-Apr-2020

8 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

MINISTRY. OF AVIATION

AEROl$AUTlCAL RESEARCH COUNCIL

CURRENT PAPERS

The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites

3 bY

G. E, Cook

LONDON: HER MAJESTY’S STATIONERY OFFICE

’ PRICE 6s. 6d. NET

Page 2: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook
Page 3: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

C.P. No.523

ADDEXDA cvs_--ei. e-

was written, early in 9959, several papers reflection at the surface of a solid have

Since this paper dealing with molecular appeared. Hone of them add anything, however, to our knowledge of accommodation coefficients except for the suggestion that the values obtained by Viedmann may be inaccurate due to experimental errors. If this is so, the accommodation coefficient would be less than the value assumed here, in which case the drag coefficients would be slightly higher than those quoted.

gap-& * The reference area for the drag coefficient is the projected area in the direction of motion for all bodies except the inclined flat plate, for which it is the area of the plate.

To determine the density of the u.pper atmosphere from the orbital motion of a near earth satellite a knowledge of the satellite's drag is required. In this n&e, the drag of a body in free molecule flow, the flow regfme appropriate to a satellite in orbit, is discussed, and the molecular speed ratio is related to the properties of the upper atmos- phere. The mechanism of molecular reflection at the satellite's surface and the surface temperature are considered. The drag coefficients of some simple shapes are quoted for apJ~ropriate molecular speed ratios, snd the drag coefficients are obtained for cylinders and a cone with axes inclined at any angle to the direction of motion.

,,*_l-__.__I_I-_I ~I__ __.“. . * . . I . ,- ‘-cm.“Y-m-.lr/. 1 . . .% .-1.- s . ,."V Previously issued as R.L;..30 Technical: Ncte Ko. G.W.531 - A.R.C. 21,787.

Page 4: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook
Page 5: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

LIST OF CON'IXNTS -a--*

INTRODUCTION 4

AXXMFTIONS OF FPtl!X MOLECULE FLOW THEORY

MOLECULAR SPEED RATIO FOR A SATELLITE IN ORBIT

MECHANISM OF MOLECULAR REFLECTION

TEMPEFATURE OF 1~ SATSLLITE

PO&ES ON A BODY II'J FBE MOLECULEl FLOW

6.1 Force due to impinging molecules 6‘2 Force produced by specular reflection 6.3 Force produced by diffuse re-emission

4

5

7

8

8

8 IO IO

7 DRAG OF SOivLl3 SIXPLE SHAFES IN FREE MOLECULE FLOW 11

7.1 Drag with specular refleotion 7.2 Drag with diffuse re-emission 7.3 Drag of an inclined circular cylinder of infinite

length

41 11

7.4 Drag of an inclined cylinder of finite length 7.5 Drag of a conical body

RESULTS

12 12 13

8 16

9 CONCLUSIONS 18

ACKNOVL~DGEMENTS

LIST OF SYMBOLS

LIST OF RXF3XENCXS

APPENDIX - THE DRAG OF AN INCLINED CIRCULAR CYLINDXR

ILLUSTRATIONS - Figs.149

DETACHABLE ABSTRACT CARDS

19

19

22

-2-

Page 6: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

LIST OY ILLUSTRATIONS ---.wl Fig.

Variation of most probable molecular speed with altitude 1

Variation of velocity at perigee with altitude 2

Molecular speed ratio at a perigee altitude of 100 n.m. for various scale heights 3

Molecular speed ratio at a perigee altitude of 150 n.m. for various scale heights 4

Molecular speed ratio at a perigee altitude of 200 n,m. for various soale heights 5

Mean free path as a function of altitude assuming M =. 15 6

Coordinate system for element of area 7

Elemental area for inclined cylinder, of length L and radius r 8

Notation for a conical body 9

Drag of a flat plate normalto the direction of motion 10

Drag of a sphere 11

Drag of an infinite circular cylinder with axis perpendicular to the direction of motion 12

S CD for an inclined cylinder with the dimensions given in section 8 (8 = 7.1) 13

Variation of drag coefficient with inclination of axis of rotation to direction of motion, for a about an axis transverse to its length (s = 14

S CD for spinning circular cylinders of different length-diameter ratios (s = 7.1, 4-q = 2.1) 15

S CD for an inclined cone with the dimensions given in section 8 b = 8.8) 16

Cross-sectional area perpendicular to the direction of motion for an inclined cone with the dimensions given in section 8 47

Drag coefficient based on the cross-sectional area perpendicular to the direction of motion for an inclined cone with the dimensions given in section 8 18

Variation of S CD and mean area 2 with inclination of axis of rotation to direction of motion, for a cone with the dimensions given in section 8 spinning about an axis transverse to its length (s = 8.8) 19

-3-

Page 7: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

I INTRODUCTION

Estimates of the density of the upper atmosphere have been made recently from the perturbations of the orbits of near earth satellites, the results of various investigations being summarized in Ref.1. For this purpose a knowledge Df the satellite's attitude and drag coefficient are required. So far, various oonstant values have been assumed for the drag ooefficient, usually 2, and various assumptions have been made for tho mode of rotation so that an average frontal area can be obtained for use as the reference area. The faot that the drag coefficient will depend on the shape of the individual satellites has tended to be neglected. More reliable values for the frontal area are being obtained now that the mode of rotation of the satellites is becoming better understood. Lore accurate values for the drag ooefficient are therefore also required if the density is to be determined accurately.

The purpose of this note is to review present knowledge of the aerodyna- mics of bodies moving in the upper atmosphere and suggest values for the drag coefficients which can be used for the determination of density at altitudes between 100 and 200 nautical miles, where free molecule flow is the appropriate flow regime.

2 ASSUMPTIONS OF FRXE MOLECULE FLOW THEORY

Free molecule flow is defined as ocourring where the mean free path of the molecules is larger than a typical linear dimension of the body. The ratio of the length of the mean free path to a typical linear dimension is the

9 Knudsen number II, so that free molecule flow occurs for large values of K.

In recent years several theoretioal and a few experimental investigations have been made to determine the heat transfer to a body and the aerodynamic

t forces aoting on it in free molecule flow,and recently Schaaf and ChambrG2 have given a summary bf this work.

The usual assumptions, when rx&ulating the forces aoting on a bod,y in free molecule flow, are:

(i) Collisions between impinging and re-emitted molecules are negligible.

(ii) The gas molecules have a Maxwel.lian distribution of thermal velocity superimposed upon the uniform mass velocity.

(iii) The molecule3 are reflected specularly or diffusely from the body surface.

The mechanism of molecular refiection is discussed in Section 4. On the basis of assumption (i) the total force aoting on the body oan be split into two parts : one due to the impinging moleoules and another due to the re-emission

b of the molecules from the surfaoe.

Measurements of the heat transfer to oiroular Oylinders3 indicate that F fully developed f

In a recent pape IJ ee molecule flow exists for Knudsen numbers greater than 2.

Liu has given the theoretical solution for the drag of a flat plate at eero'incidence in an almost free molecule flow making the follow- ing assumptions:

(i) The rate of collisicn between the molecules incident on and reflected fr3m the surface is small compared with that between the incident mole- cules and the surface element under oonsideration.

(ii) The probability of a reflected molecule colliding twice with the incident moleoules is negligible compared with the probability of its colliding once.

Page 8: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

(iii) The molecules are refleoted diffusely.

The results of this paper indioate a value of at least 3 for K if the drag of a flat plate is not to be more than 2 per cent less than the value for fully developed free molecule flow with values of+/Reynolds No,/(Maoh No.) appropriate to

-3

satellites. The variation of mean free path with altitude, which is deter- mined in Section 3 and illustrated in Fig,6, indicates that K will exceed 3 for a satellite in orbit and the omrect drag will be that predicted by Free Y moleoule flow theory.

3 MOLECULAR SPEED R&T10 FOR A SATELLITE IN ORBIT

The most important parameter governing the forces and heating of a body in free molecule flow is the molecular speed ratio s defined by

3 = speed of satellite

most probable molecular speed '

It is well known from the kinetic theory of gases5 that, if a Maxwellian velocity distribution is assumed, the most probable molecular speed vm is related to the root mean square speed C by the relation

and that C is given by

c =J-ii$@ (2)

where p is the pressure, p the density, T the absolute temperature, R the gas oonstant and M the molecular weight.

At present, knowledge of the properties of the upper atmosphere is in a state which can only be termed "fluid", as neither the temperature nor the composition are accurately known, so that the molecular weight is also unknown. It might appear that to determine the most prcbable molecular speed would be a difficult task. Fortunately, this is not so if the atmosphere is assumed to be isothermal in the region under consideration , giving an exponential variation of density with altitude

P = p, exp - + c 3

(3)

where h is the altitude above some reference level where the density is p,, and H is the looal scale height which is related to the local atmospherio properties by the relation

g being the local value of the aooeleration due to gravity.

-5-

Page 9: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

Combining equations (I), (2) and (4) gives a simple relationship between the most probable molecular speed and the soale height

v = m m. (5)

Values of the soale height can be determined from a t eoretioal relationship for the deorease of the perigee radius of a satellite 2 or from the rate of change of density with height! obtained by plotting values of density derived from satellite observations. Neither method is very acourate, but it is prbbable that H lies between 25 and 50 nautical miles for altitudes between 100 and 200 nautical miles. Values of vm are shown in Fig.1 for scale heights of 20, 30, 40 and 50 nautical miles.

For a satellite moving in an elliptic orbit, the oomponents of the velooity are given by

v = r 21 desinq a (l-e2)

(6)

vn = Js (1 + e 00s $)

i I

where vr is the velocity component along the radius vector, vn is the velocity component perpendicular to the radius vector, e is the eooentricity of the satellite's orbit, a is the semi-major axis, p the constant of the earth's gravitational field (assumed spherically symmetrio) and $ is the true anomaly. Most of the action of air drag takes place over a small arc near perigee,and since the velocity will not vary greatly as the satellite moves through this arc, it is convenient to take the velocity vn at perigee as the speed of the satellite. This velocity is shown in Fig.2 for the altitude range of interest for eccentricities af 0, 0.1 and 0.2. The moleoular speed ratio appropriate to a particular height depends on the values of the scale height and on the eccentricity of the orbit and is given in Figs.3 to 5 for perigee altitudes ef 100, 150 and 200 nautical miles. Examination of these figures indioates that the range of interest is from s = 6 to s - 9.

The length of the mean free path h of a gas molecule is given b 3

h = ‘9 7CN 0)

where a is the diameter of the moleoules and N is the number of molecules per unit volume which is given by

P = mN (8)

m being the mass of one molecule. Krassovsky7 has reported preliminary results obtained from instruments aboard satellite 1958 62 (Sputnik 3) which indicate that above about 135 nautical miles ('250 km) the atmosphere is in the main of

-6-

Page 10: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

atomic oomposition, many of the atoms being ionized. The main constituents above 250 km are oxygen and nitrogen, and to simplify the caloulation of h the atmosphere is taken as a monatomic gas of molecular weight 15 (this figure may, of oourse, become available).

have to be modified as more experimental results

altitude is given ' The variation of' the length of the mean free path tith

value of 1.8 x IO' iY Fig.6 for the density variation of Ref.1, assuming a

cm for the radius of the molecules. The value of mole- cular weight used is the lowest that is likely to occur and the length Crr the mean free'path will be underestimated at the lower altitudes.

The mechanism of re-emission can be divided into several types; for the purpase of theoretical analysis the wo whioh are usually oonsidered possible are specular and diffuse, Specular reflection occurs when the angle of reflection af a molecule is equal to the angle of incidence, i.e. the tangential velocity oomponent remains unchanged and the normal oomponent is reversed. With diffuse reflection re-emission takes plaoe according te the Knudsen cosine law which states that the direction of motion of the molecules after impact is independent of the direction of motion before impact, and that the number of molecules re-emitted between the angles 8 and 8 + 60 with the normal to the surfaoe is proportionalto CBS 8 60. The velocity distribution is assumed to be Maxwellian and its magnitude is determined by the temperature of re-emission, which is related to the surfaoe temperature. The most probable velocity of re-emission v in terms of the

% temperature of the re-emitted gas Tr is given by

assuming the number of moleoules dissociated by impact is negligible. The temperature bf re-emission is usually related to the surfaoe temperature by introducing the accommodation oocfficient a whioh is the ratio of the energy ohange of the molecules that strike the surface to the energy ohange that would occur if they were emitted at the surface temperature TW. It is defined by

a = Ei - Er Ei - %

where Ei is the energy flux of the incident molecules, E, that of the re-

emitted moleoules and s that of molecules at the surface temperature. Strictly, different aocommodation coefficients should be defined for the three types of moleoular energies: translational, rotational and vibrational. In practice only one value of a is used.

In general, reflection will not be entirely diffuse or entirely specular, but will be a combination of both; a fraction f will be reflected diffusely and a fraction (l-f) specularly. For entirely specular refleotion a= f = 0 and for entirely diffuse reflection with complete accommodation a= f = 1. There are o

3 y meagre experimental values of a and f available.

Measurements by Millikan indicate that f is nearly unitp and measurements

* A recently published paper by Hurlbut 15 also indicates that f is probably between 0,95 and I.

-7-

Page 11: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

by Viedmann' ' indicate that a is approximately unity, although these results are not for high speed flow. For cylinders in free molecule flow it has been found3 that the heat transfer data are well correlated with theory for the accommodation coefficient equal to 0.9.

The surface of a material used for a satellite, even if highly polished, would not be smooth oompared with molecular dimensions so that uniform refleotion in any particular direction could hardly be expected. For this reason and in view of the small amount of experimental evidenoe available it is believed that the assumption of entirely diffuse reflection should be made to obtain numerical values of drag. In the absence of measured values of Q, for large molecular speed ratios, the best approximation is a = I.

5 TEMPERATURE OF A SATELLITE

miles, For bodies moving high in the atmosphere, i.e. above about 130 nautical

it is well known that aerodynamio heating is negligible and that solar radiation is the prcdomtiating influence determining the temperature, whioh varies as the body moves into and out of the earth's shadow. The range through which the temperature varies will be governed by several faotors, inoluding the absorptivity and the emissivity of the surface and the heat oapacity ef the shell. If the absorptivity is high the temperature variation of the satellite oould be as great as IOOoC, or more, during one revolution round the earth, although for a small absorptivity it would be much less. Below an altitude of 130 nautical miles aerodynamio heating begins to have an appreoi- able effeot. The satellites so far launched have only flown below 130 nautioal miles for a small fraction of their orbits and aertidynamio heating would be small compared with the effect mentioned abovs.

The temperature of satellite 1958 Q (Explorer I), which uses a passive techni ue Bibbela

for temperature control, has been investigated by Buwalda and and oompared with measured values of the shell temperature. Resia-

tance thermometers were plaoed at the tip of the nose cone, on the ncae cone an$ aft on the oylindrioal seotion. Shell temperatures ranging from -25'C to 75 C were observed, although most of the observations were in a narrow band near O°C which was about 25'C wide. During this period its perigee was at about 200 nautical miles.

For the purpose of calculations in this note the satellites have been assumed to have a shell temperature of O'C, which appears reasonable in the light of the exTerimcnta1 evidence from Explorer I.

6 FORCES ON A BODY IN FREE MOLECULE FLOW

6.1 Force due to impinaina moleoull-

The equations used in this note are those given by Stalder and &rick in Ref.11. The co-ordinate system for an element of area is shown in Fig.'). The x-axis is normal to the surface and directed into it. The satellite's velocity vector 1 has components Ux, Uy and Uz in the directions of the local axes.

Staider and Zuriok give the differential component of the foroe,in the direction defined by ex, ey and Es, due to the impinging molecules aoting on

the element of area dA, as

-8-

Page 12: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

i-l Y--b

DN I N

+ +

I bX

25 N Q L-!-J

Q

L5-l Q 0 Q

oz” J-

9 Q

F-2 -? +

N 02

-I-

c+

2

-I-

**

x e./

OH “--A *--A *‘--,H

I

-V-

Page 13: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

t

The total velocity of a molecule is the vector sum of the satellite's velocity and the thermal velocity of the molecule. Equation (jl), though unwieldy, is retained because the first part represents the force on the front side of the element of area and the second part that on the rear side, and thesr: forces art; required separately when considering a conical body in So&ion 7.5. It should be noted that the direction cosines appropriate to the forward facing side o in Xcf.ll.

f t3e element are always used in equation (II), as

6.2 Force producedtixecular refleotion -r--u)-

For specular reflection the momentum change is perpendicular to the surface, as the momenta of the impin The force is found from equation (12 k

ing and re-emitted molecules are equal. using

(13)

It is given by

p4? 4 dGS = 2 - 75x a2 3

dA . (14)

6.3 Fcrce produced by diffuse re-emission

The normal re-emission force on the front side of a differential area inolined to the flow is given by Staider and Zuriok as

where x = exp (- s'43xt) + 6 B exd L-l + erf (a &xd)] (16)

e xd = oosine of the ar,gle between the normal to the element of area and the direction of the drag

and s = a r molecular speed ratio of re-emission.

On the rear side, distinguished by a dash, the force is

pv2 dG;;r = 2 x'u 2ss 2

where xt = exp (-s2dxi2) - ~5 8 45id &I - erf (9 &id)] .

(17)

(1fo

- IO -

Page 14: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

7 DRAG OF SOME SIhPLE SHAPES IN FREE MOLECULE FLOW

Several authors have investigated the drag of simple shapes in free molecule flow by integrating equations (12), (15) and (17). The results quoted in 7.1 and 7.2 are from Bef.11.

7.1 Drag with soeoular refleotioz

(i) Flat pl t a e normal to the stream

cDs = 4 14-L ( > 2s2

erf (s) + & exp (-s2) . (19)

The second term is negligible for molecular speed ratios appropriate to satellites.

(ii) Circular cylinder perpendicular to the stream

where IO and I, are Bessel functions of the first kind and imaginary argument. 8

For large values of s the Bessel functions can be expanded asymptotically to give

&+I 'Ds = 3 [ 1 7 l

(iii) Sphere

2

cDs = 2 ( 1+-1,-a, > s2 4S4

erf (8) + 2s +I exp (-s2) . tl;, 2

The seoond term is negligible for molecular speed ratios appropriate to satellites.

7-2 Drag with diffuse re-emission

(i) Flat plate normal to the stream

cD = 21+1 ( > G.K 2s2

erf (s) + $7 exp (-s2) + r . r

(ii) Flat plate inolined to the stream at angle of attack y

(21)

(22)

:.

(23) b

2 'D = G exp (us2 sin2y)+ 2 siny erf (s sin y) + 4i &12r s . (24)

r

-11 -

Page 15: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

(iii) Circular cylinder perpendicular to the stream

CD J 5 exp (-$[I0 (.)+(q..)[l.($) + I1 ($)--J +$ (25)

( > 312 2 2 ,+.A .+-

J 4fir for large values of a.

0-d Sphere

2 cD

z 2 (

,.-+-+ erf(a)+2sf’ 2~ix a 4s > -hc5

3 exp (-fi2) + yg- l

r

(26)

(27)

7.3 Drag Of' an inclined circular oylinder of infinite length

The drag of a circular cylinder with i-k3 axis inclined to the direction of motion at an angle y,as shown in Fi ,8 and with diffuse reflection has been obtained from aquations(l2), (15) and ff?7j. Th e appendix.

calculation is given in the The result for an infinite cylinder, using the area parallel t0

the cylinder axis as the reference area, is

7.4 Drag of an inclined cylinder of finite length_

To obtain the drag of a circular cvlinder of finite length and radius r, the drag of the two end; is considered &paratoly surface. The total drag is the sum of two parts: cylinder of length L and the drag of a flat plate irclined at an angle y as shown in Fig.8 the drag

. from that of the curved the drag of an inclined of area 7r r2* For a cylinder is given by

where S is the area normal to the direction of motion. - 12 -

Page 16: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

7.5 Drag of a ccnica1 body

For a conical body there are four cases to consider, depending on whether the apex or base is leading (see Fig.9) and on the angle sf attack (Y or r>- If the apex is leading and the angle af attack is less than the * semi-vertex angle of the acne 6, the curved surface is entirely exposed to the main flow. When the angle of attack exceeds the semi-vertex angle some of the curved surface is partially shielded from the main flow. The direction ) cosine 45 between the stream velocity and the normal to the surface of the cone is given by

e = cc9 y sin 6 - sin y 00s 6 00s 9 (SO>

where $ is an angle measured around the base as shown in Fig.9. The partially shielded area is bounded by lines along which the stream velocity is parallel to the surface, i.e. by lines defined by 4 = 0, which occur at values of 9 given by

$, = cc9 -1 tan 6 tan' (39 >

Similarly, If the base is leading, the curved surface is entirely shielded from the main flow if the angle of attack is less than the semi-vertex angle, and is partially exposed if the angle of attack exceeds the semi-vertex angle.

The element of area considered is shown in Fig.9 and is I

dA= r2 2 sin6 dGJ (32)

where r is the radius of the base. If 6 < y < Tc/2, the total cross-sectional area perpendicular to the dirccticn of motion is

S r2 TF = sin I (00s y sin

4 r2 =

sin C 00s y sin 6

6- sin y cos 6 cos q5) d$

(n-q5,) + siny 00s 6 sin #, 1 . (33)

L

IT 0 Q y s 6, the area is

S = xr2ccsy. (34) +

The total drag is found by adding the drag of the curved surface to that of the base. For 0 d y < 7c/2, the drag of the base is that of the shielded side of a flat plate. Using equations (II) and (17), it is given by

- 13 -

Page 17: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

SC 'base

= fr2 8 c

exp (-s* cos* “p) -disoosy 1-b ( $Jp.erf (s~osy~]

2 7tr c!osy 2s sr c

=p !-a2 cos2y) - v?K 8 CO8 y 1 - erf (9 c3og y) C II l (35)

For 0 < -q G 7f/2 the drag of the b.%sc is t -a 3 t plate and is given by

of the front side cf a flat

The drag of the curved surface (c.s.) will now be written down making use of the work of S-balder and Zurick.

2 n SGD = 1'

2 R $5 + r2 714xdqj CS 4% s sin 6 I

0 2ssrsin6 s

0

(37)

where

For y- z 0, this reduces to

7 ' 'D = d-iL r2

3 sin& cs c exp (-s* sin26) + -4% s sin 6 -I+ ( --$)p f erf (s siri6jJ-j

+,,,,2 2ss i

exp (-a2 si26)*Jx 8 sin8 + erf (s sin6) 13 . (38) r

- 14 -

Page 18: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

4 7E r2

+2ssrsins - ci 4' x' ag.5 +

I 3 4% w (39)

0 4

where

R’ a 8 c

exp (-s2 4St2) - ~~~943~ [I-eti (s&t)] 3

- $ 4' [I -erf (set)]

x’ = exp (-s2Et2) - 4% s 4’ [I -erf (s&l)]

and 4’ = -4.

When y = %/2 th e integrals can be evaluated to give

For high molecular speed ratios, the Btasel functions can be expanded asymptotically to give

SCD = r2 OS s2 sin6 cos6 CC

j- ' 4 s2 OS2 6 >

-I- (s2 +$) oos2h ( 2+ ?

>I 2s2 cos2 6

(0) Base leading, 0 d Q d 6.

In this case the entire curved surface is shielded from the main flow. Using equation (II), the drag is given by

SCD = r2 OS 4-x s2 I sins0 Tl d.# r2 & xcx rig5 I - 2ssrsin i I (42)

0

- 15 -

Page 19: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

where

R, = s c exp (-s2 c2> - lh se b -err(se)] 3

- $ 4 [I -erf (se)]

x1 = exp (es2 e2) - 4x s 4 [I - erf (s 43)J

and 4 E 00s q sin 6 - sin q cos 6 00s q5.

For ,rj = 0, the integrals can be evaluated to give

' 'D lh r2

OS =: *a -erf (s sin S)]

3

7~ r2 -Tq c

exp (-s2 siri? 6) - fx 9 sin 6 [d - erf (9 sins)] 3

. (43)

(a) Base leading, 6 c y 4 %/2.

An area bounded by the lines 9, = cos -1 tan 6 - is exposed to the main Mow tan rl

and the drag is now given by

where

$I2 = 9 c

exp (us2 at2) f $7~ 9 e' [I + erf (se')] 3

'it &' [I +erf (&')I f 2

and fi,, x, and 8 have the same definitions as in (0).

0 RESULTS

At the altitudes considered in this note the atmbsphere is suffioiently tenucus for free moleoule flow to occur, the Knudsen number being greater than 3, evc:n az 100 nautical miles. Taking the soale height from the model atmosphere of Ref.1, equation (4) indicates a temperature of about 1200% at an altitude of 200 nautical miles. If a surface temperature of O°C is assumed for the satellite (see Section 5), together with an accommodation coeffioient

- 16 -

Page 20: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

of unity, the molecular speed ratio of re-emission will be about tvFioe the incident molecular speed ratio, The drag coefficients of some simple shapes have been oalculated for molecular speed ratios from 5 to 10 and for values

Of I of i and 2 T

"q which art3 two iikely values

for altiitudes between 100 and 200 nautical miles, A ~a.l~e of uniky

for T J-

F oorresponds approximately t3 (x t. 0.95. The results are r

shown in Figs.10 to 12 for a flat plate normal to the direotion of motion, a sphere and an infinite oircular oylinder respectively. There is a differ- ence of 5 per cent or less in the drag coefficient for the two values of

J- 2 Tr l

For comparison, results for specular refleotion are also given, when

the drag can be either greater than or less than that for diffuse re-emission depending on the shape of the body- The greatest error would be for a flat plate normal to the direction of motion when CD w 2CD, but no satellite is

9 likely to have this shape. For a sphere CD is 4 per cent less than CD if

9 T

r - = 2 and 8 per cent less if f = 1. Tr J-

For an infinite cylinder CD is r 0

27 per cent greater than CD if $- = d-

2 and 21 per oent greater if $= = I. r J- r

If reflection is neither entirely diffuse or entirely specular (probably the true state of affairs) the drag coefficient would be c

f$+ (l-f) CD 0 S

As it is extremely unlikely that f would be below 0.8, the errors involved in assuming P = 1 would not exoeed 5 per cent for a cylinder and would be considerably less for a sphere.

For the purpose of calculating drag, the American Explorer satellites can be taken as circular cylinders, 80 inches long and 6 inches diameter. Using equation (29) values of S CD have been obtained for all possible inclinations to the direction of motion and are given in Fig.13 for s = 7.1,

T F Tr

= 1 and for s = 7.1, J-

$ = 2.1. These values are for Explorer I with r

its perigee at an altitude of nearly 200 nautical miles. Exp@rer I began life spinning about the longitudinal axis, but it is believed that there was a fairly rapid ohange to,rotation about the axis of maximum moment of inertia. The value of the drag ooefficient to be used will depend on the mode of rotation. The two extreme modes of rotation are (a) spinning prapeller- wise and (b) tumbling end-over-end: for (a) the satellite is spinning like an aeroplane and for (b P

repeller with the axis of [email protected] parallel to the direction of motion; the axi 3 of'3pini.s perpendicular to the direction of motion. For

a cylinder with the dimensions given above, rotating about an axis transverse

to its length, the drag cceffioient r

ean value of SCD 1 mean value of S , is plotted in Fig.14

against the angle E between the axis of rotation and the satellite's velocity vector. The mean value of the area perpendicular to the dkection of motion is

- 17 -

Page 21: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

2 r2 sin E + y E(e)

where E(s) is the complete elliptic integral of the second kind. The drag

coefficient lies between 2.12 and 2.25 for = 2 and it would be about 0.40

The equation determining density at perigee p, from the motion of a satellite in an elliptic orbit whose period is changing at a rate $$ is 13

PP = dT m m-- dt 3SC, - 2e -v&-g (45)

where m is the mass of the satellite and the scale height H is assumed oonstant over the small region near perigee where air drag is important. It can be seen from this equation that the quantity required is really S CD and not CD. For

spinning about the axis of maximum moment of inertia, the value of S CD for

T q= 2.1 lies between 7.07 f-t2 for mode (a) and 4.83 ft2 for mode (b), and in

the absence of further information the best estimate of S CD is the mean of

these two values, i.e. S CD = 5.95 ft2. The value would be 6.20 for 8 = I. J- r

The effect of varying the length-diameter ratio is shown in Fig.15

The satellite 1958 62 (Sputnik 3) is approximately oonioal in shape and to obtain its drag a cone of simi&z shape has been oonsidered. This oone had a base diameter of 68 inches and a semi-vertex angle of 17.6~. Values of S CD were obtained by numerical integration of equation (35) to (44) for s = 8.8 and s = 17 which are appropriate to a perigee altitude of 120 nautioal miles and ag eccentricity of 0.1. The results are shown in Fig.16. In this oase the extreme values of S CD occur for mode (a) and an intermediate mode of rotation. For mode (a) S CD is 55.07 ft2 and for mode (b) the average value is 55.69 ft2. The area Perpendicular to the direction of motion is shown in Fig.17 for all Possible inclinations to the direction of motion and the oorresponding drag coefficients are shown in Fig.18. Assuming the satellite is spinning about an axis transverse to the axis of the oone the mean value of S CD and S are plotted in Fig.19 as fun&ions of the inclination of the axis of rotation to the direction of motion.

9 $IM;LUSIONS

Reliable estimates of the drag of a satellite can be obtained even though errors arise due to lack of *knowledge of (1) the moleoular speed ratio; (2) the mechanism of molecular reflection, including the fraction of molecules reflected specularly, the accommodation cbeffioient and the temperature of the satellite; and (3) its mode of rotation.

For the reasons given in Section 4, it is believed that the molecules are diffusely re-emitted from the surface. If as many as 20 per cent of the

- 18 -

Page 22: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

molecules were reflected specularly, the error in the drag would not exceed 5 per cent for a cylinder and would be negligible for a sphere. The error introduced by assuming complete accommodation, is pr&aXy less than the err or introduced by assuming an incorrect mode of rotation if the satellite is spinning. Section 8, (d - 0.075 L), the use

For the aylinder oonsidered in of a mean value of S CD of 1.78 Ld fcr

F

density determination would produce a maximum error of 19 per cent if' either spinning propellerwise or tumbling end-over-end was the sole mode of rotation. * Values of S CD for spinning circular cylinders of different length-diameter ratio are shcwn in Fig.15. Better accuracy can be obtained fcr spherical satellites, the drag of the sphere being combined with an average drag of the antennae. af the sphere,

The drag of the antennae is less accurately known than that but their area is usually less and their contribution to the

total drag is smaller. If the conical Sputnik 3 is assumed to be spinning about an axis transverse to its length, the mean value of S CD is 14.86 Ld, which will be in errcr by less than 4 per cent, and which corresponds to a mean drag coefficient of 2.12 if S is taken as the mean nf the values in Fig.19.

The scale height can only be obtained approximately from a density- altitude curve derived from satellite observations. Figs.3 to 5 indioate a large variation of molecular speed ratio with scale height at a particular altitude. Fortunately, the dry* bb is not very sensitive to the molecular speed ratio, an error of 1 in s affecting the drag by less than 1.5 per cent.

No account is taken of the drag due to the accumulation of electric charge'4 or the consequences of dissociation of molecules on impact,

1 since these

effects are believed to be negligible at altitudes between 9C0 and 200 nautical mi?.es. ACKNOv?LEDGEMENTS

The author criticism during

wishes to thank Mr. D. G. King-Hele for his helpful

who computed the the preparation of the manuscript and also vz. D, J. Ferris drag of the cone.

c

Symbol

a

dA

C. 1

c

cD

cDS

D

Di

Dr

LIST OF SYMBOLS -ww

Dafinition --a-pu

semi-major axis of satellitti's orbit

area of an element of surface

component of total velocity of a molecule in the direction i

root mean square speed of molecules

drag coefficient for diffuse reflection

drag coefficient for specular reflection

total drag

drag due to incident molecules

drag due to reflected molecules

- 49 -

Page 23: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

LIST OF SYXBOLS (Con-IA.)

e

Ei

Er

%

f

g

Gi

Gr

G S

h

II

K

ei

L

m

ai

N

P

r

R

9

S r S

T

Tr

U

'i

V m

eccentricity of satellite's orbit

energy flux of inoident molecules

energy flux of re-emitted molecules

energy flux of molecules re-emitted at the wall temperature

fraction of molecules refleoted diffusely

local acceleration due to gravity

momentum force of impinging molecules

normal diffuse re-emission momentum foroe

total normal specular momentum force

altitude above reference level

local scale height

Knudsen number

direction cosine between the component of f&ce required and the i-axis

length of cylinder or axis of cone

mass of one molecule

molecular weight of the atmosphere

number of molecules per unit volume

atmospheric pressure

radius of cylinder or base of oone

universal gas constant

moleoular speed ratio

molecular speed ratio of re-emission

frontal area of body

temperature of the atmusphere

temperature of gas re-emitted from the surfaoe of the satellite

ma58 velocity

component of mass velocity in direotion of i-axis

most probable molecular speed

- 20 -

Page 24: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

V m r V n

vr

XYYYZ

a

P

Y

6

E

r

8

h

P P

PO CT

d

X

X’

erf(a)

LIST OF SYMBOLS (Contd.)

most probable moleoular speed of re-emission

component of satellite's velocity perpendicular to the radius vector

component of satellite's velocity along the radius vector

local Cartesian coordinates

accommodation coefficient

reciprocal of most probable molecular speed

angle of incidence of axis of cylinder or cone to stream

semivertex angle of cone

angle between axis of rotation of cylindrical satellite and its velocity vector

angle of incidence of axis of cone to stream (base leading)

angular variable defined by Fig.4

mean free path

constant of earth's gravitational field density

density at reference altitude diameter of a molecule angle measured around base of cone as shown in Fig.9

dimensionless quantity defined by

X = exp(-s* 4:) -k <71. 9 .8X [I + erf( s dx)]

dimensionless quantity defined by

X' = exp(-s* Ci*) - 4X. s 44 [l - erf(s 44>]

the true anomaly a

error function $= 7c i exp(-t*) dt

0

Superscript refers to shielded surface only

- 21 -

Page 25: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

LIST OF P;EFERENCES ____i--a_m__yI.

No * Author

1 King-Hele, D.G.

2 Sohaaf, S.A., Chambr6, P.L.

3 Stalder, J.R., Goodwin, G., Creager, M.O.

4 Liu, V.C.

5 Loeb, L.B.

6 King-Hele, D.G., Leslie, D.C.M.

7 Krassovsky, V.I.

8 Millikan, R.A.

9 y?iedmann, M.L., Trumpler, P.R.

10 Duwalda, E.P., Hibbs, R.R.

11 Staider, J.R., Zurick, V.J.

12 Siry, J.v!.

13 Sterne, T.E.

Density of the atmosphere at heights between 200 Km and 400 Km, from analysis of artificial satellite orbits. Nature, Vol.183, pp.1224-1227, May 2, 1959.

Flow of rarefied gases. Section H of The Funda- mentals of Gas Dynamics (Editor: H.W.Emmons): Vol.III of High Speed Aerodynamics and Jet Propulsion. Oxf'ord University Press, London, 1958.

Heat transfer to bodies in a high-speed rarefied gas stream. NACA Report 1093, 1952.

On the drag of a flat plate at zero incidence in almost-free-molecule flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vo1.5, Part 3, pp.481~490, April 1959.

The Kinetic Theory of Gases. McGraw Hill, New York, 1934.

Effect of air drag on the orbit of the Russian earth satellite 19578: comparison of theory and observation. Nature, Vol.181, pp.1761-1763, June 28, 1958.

Exploration of the upper atmosphere with the help of the third Soviet sputnik. 9th Astronautical Congress, Amsterdam, August 1958.

Coefficients of slip in gases and the law of reflection of molecules from the surfaces of solids and liquids, Physical Review, Vo1.21, ppe217-238, 1923.

Thermal accommodation coeffioients. Trans. of A.S.M.E., Vol.68, pp.57~64, 1946.

Satellite temperature measurements for 1 Y58a. National Academy of Sciences, I.G.Y. Satellite Report Series No.3, May I, 1958.

Theoretical aerodynamic characteristics of bodies in a free molecule flow field. NACA T.N.2423, July 1951.

The Vanguard I.G.Y. earth satellite program. Vth General Assembly of C.S.A.G.I., Moscow, August 1958.

Formula for inferring atmospheric density from the motion of artifioial earth satellites, Science, Vol.127, p.1245, May 23, 1958.

- 22 -

Page 26: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

No. Author

14 Jastrow, R., Pearse, C.A.

15 Hurlbut, F.C.

I;IST OF REFERENCES (Contd.) -u_w

Title, etc_,

Atmospheric drag on the satellite. Journal of Geophysical Research, ~01.62, No.3, p.413, September 1957.

Molecular scattering at the solid surface. Recent research in molecular beams (Editor: J. Estermann), pp.145-156. Academic Press, New York and London, 1959.

r

- 23 -

Page 27: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

APPENDIX -_y)

THE DRAG OF AN INCLINED CIRCULAR CYLINDER

The drag acts in the direction of g so that in the notation of section 6 the stream velocity has components

% = Usiny sin8

U Y

= -u sin y cos 0

% = u 00s y

with the dire&ion cosines

ex = sin y sin 8

e = Y

-sin y cos 0

ez = 00s y

i

J

7

I

(4.6)

(47)

where '6 is the angle defining the element of area as shown in Fig.7. The force due to the impinging molecules acting on the differential. element of area illustrated in Fig.8.. obtained by substituting equations (46) and (47) into equation (12), is

2 dGi = E +

2 J7t s

C e;cp (- a2 sin2 y sin2 6) 1 +$ siny sin8 erf (9 ainy ain0)

3 dA

where

- 24 -

Page 28: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

Therefore the total drag on the cylinder due to the momentum of the impinging molecules i3

Di = 2rL$l'r;i& exp (- s2 sin2 r sin2 0) +

0

+ 2 (1 + ;=$) sin y sin 0 erf (3 sin y sin Cl)] d0

.-- i S2

v2 exp - s+h

2 = 2rL5 $- ( S

> Io ("2 ":"2 '> +

+(1+*) 4 x 3 sin2 y exp (A+t)[Io~2 SF”>

+I, (s's"y) j

s2 .2 \

- =

$ L exp 2rL 5x2 ( ,s2 sin2

3 s;n 'j T;

L ( 0 2 y + >

+ I, ("' ":"y)JJ.

The drag on a differential element of area due to re-ennission, obtained from equations (15) to (j8>, is

Page 29: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

Lg. sin 9 sin y cx _ x,) dl 55 r

Therefore the tata1 drag due to re-emission is

e 2<7c S5.2~ u2 2

Dr s 2 S i r L sin2 0 de

r

The total drag acting on the cylinder is given by

D = Di + Dr

( s2 ,in2 %

I? = +2rL 1 7t' e-up - 2 >

c ( I s2

s 9 sin: y ~

The drag coefficient based on the area p.wallel to the cylinder axis is

- 26 -

Page 30: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

+ sin2 y (' + 2' s2) [IO ("' 'p2 '> +

+ I, ("' 'p2 '>I ] + & sin' y .

- 27 ”

U.LO75.C.P.523.63 - Printed in England

Page 31: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

l

4,4oc

4,2OCJ

qooc

. 3,SOC

5 3,4Ol 3 W

@

W

id 3,20( $

s a

b-n 0 Et 3,ooc

2,80(

NUP’iBERS ON THE CURVES INtiCATE THE SCALE HEIGHT, H NAUTICAL MILES.

r

2,6OC

Hi30 1

I I

H=20

IS0 200 ALTITUDE IN NAUTICAL MILES.

FlG.1. VARIATION OF MOST PROBABLE MOLECULAR SPEED WITH ALTITUDE.

Page 32: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

28,OO

W

x 27,00(

ii a

k

25,001

10 -

3-

3-

o-

I I I

NUMBERS ON THE CURVES lNl3CATE THE ECCENTRICITY e OF THE ORBIT

80 100 120 140 160 I80 200 ALTITUDE OF PERIGEE IN NAUTICAL MILES.

FIG.2. VARIATION OF VELOCITY AT PERIGEE WITH ALTITUDE.

Page 33: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

II

IO

a

1 I

NUMBERS ON THE CURVES INDICATE THE ECCENTRICITY e OF THE ORBIT.

20 30 40 50

SCALE HEIGHT, H NAUTICAL MILES.

FIG.3. MOLECULAR SPEED RATIO AT A PERIGEE ALTITUDE OF 100 N.M. FOR

VARIOUS SCALE HEIGHTS.

Page 34: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

I I I

NUMBERS ON THE CURVES INDICATE THE ECCENTRICITY e OF THE ORBIT.

20 30 40 50

SCALE HEIGHT, H NAUTICAL MILES.

FlG.4. MOLECULAR SPEED RATIO AT A PERIGEE ALTITUDE OF 150 N.M. FOR

VARIOUS SCALE HEIGHTS.

Page 35: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

NUMBERS ON THE CURVES lNOlCATE THE ECCENTRICITY e OF THE ORBIT. I

? SCALE HEl@HT, H NAUTICAL MILES.

o-2

0-I

0

FIG.5. MOLECULAR SPEED RATIO AT A PERIGEE ALTITUDE OF 200 NM FOR

VARIOUS SCALE HEIGHTS.

Page 36: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

loqooc

80,000

60,000

40,000

30,000

20,000

8,000

6,000

4,000

f 3,000

x A 2,000

F if

t E 1,000

f

f 800 W r 600

f

100 120 140 160 180 200 220

ALTITUDE IN NAUTICAC MILES.

FIG.6 MEAN FREE PATH AS A FUNCTION OF ALTITUDE ASSUMING M=lS.

Page 37: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

FIG.7 COORDINATE SYSTEM FOR OF AREA, dA.

ELEMENT

FIG.8. ELEMENTAL AREA FOR INCLINED CYLINDER, OF LENGTH L AND RADIUS r,

d A= rLd0.

Page 38: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

U ELEMENT OF AREA dA =

0 0 APEX LEADING, ANGLE OF ATTACK = b’

(ti BASE LEADING, ANGLE OF ATTACK= q

FIG.9 (as b) NOTATION FOR A CONICAL BODY.

Page 39: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

:

l

t

i

----w--w---- ----- -w-w- ,---w-

WECULAR

5 6 7 8 3 10

MOLECULAR SPEED RATIO, S .

FIGlO. DRAG OF A FLAT PLATE NORMAL TO THE DIRECTION OF MOTION.

Page 40: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

---- W.---w

DIFFUSE

6 7 8 MOLECULAR SPEED RATIO, S

a

FIG.ll. DRAG OF A SPHERE.

Page 41: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

27 - - - - I-r ---a ;PECULAR

2.8

2.6

2*c s 6 1 8

MOLECULAR SPEED RATIO, S. a 10

FIC.12. DRAG OF AN INFINITE CIRCULAR CYLINDER WITH AXIS PERPENDICULAR

TO THE DIRECTION OF MOTION.

Page 42: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

“t z s u)

8-

7-

6-

5-

4-

3-

2-

I

i CO’ 40* 60° 80" INCLINATION OF THE AXIS OF THE CYLINOER TO THE FREE

STREAM DIRECTION, b’

f

z

r

FIG.13. SC,, FOR AN INCLINED CYLINDER WITH THE DIMENSIONS GIVEN IN SECTION 8

(s=7*1)

Page 43: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

d

INCLINATION OF THE AXIS OF ROTATION TO THE DIRECTION OF MOTION, & .

FIG. 14. VARIATION OF DRAG COEFFICIENT WITH INCLINATION OF AXIS OF ROTATION TO DIRECTION OF MOTION, FOR A CYLINDER SPINNING ABOUT AN AXIS TRANSVERSE TO

ITS LENGTH @=7-I, ,/5=2-I)

Page 44: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

MOOE (a) : CYLlNOfR SPINNING PROPELLERWISE.

MOOE (b) : CYLINDER TlJM6LlNq ENO- OVER-END.

MEAN : MEAN OF VALUES FOR MODES (a) AND (b)

MODE (h>

MODE (b)

0 S IO I5 CO RATIO OF LENGTH TO OIAMETER, 5

FlG.15. SC0 FOR SPINNING CIRCULAR CYLINDERS OF DIFFERENT LENGTH - DIAMETER RATIOS (S 170 I, Gv = 24)

Page 45: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

0 20° 4o” 60” 80° loo* 120° 140° f60° l8O0

FIG.16. SC0 FOR AN INCLINED CONE WITH THE DIMENSIONS GIVEN IN SECTION 8 (S-843)

Page 46: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

29

28

21

26

25

24 Boo ao”

WLE BETWEEN AXIS OF THE CONE AND ITS VELOCITY VECTOR.

FlG.1’1 CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA PERPENDICULAR TO THE DIRECTION MOTION FOR AN INCLINED CONE WITH THE DIMENSIONS GIVEN

SECTION 8.

OF IN

* .

Page 47: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

2-2

2. I

2.C Y

20° 4o” 60” SO” loo0 120” 140° 160° 180°

ANGLE BETWEEN A&S OF CONE AND ITS VELOCITY VECTOR.

FIG.18. DRAG COEFFICIENT BASED ON THE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA PERPENDICULAR TO THE DIRECTION OF MOTION FOR AN INCLINED

CONE HAVING THE DIMENSIONS GIVEN IN SECTION 8.

Page 48: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

0' 20’ 4o” SO’ SO”

INCLINATION OF THE AXIS OF ROTATION TO THE OIRECTION OF MOTION.

FIG. 19. VARIATION OF SC0 AND MEAN AREA 3 WITH INCLINATION OF AXIS OF ROTATION TO DIRECTION OF MOTION, FOR A CONE WITH THE DIMENSIONS GIVEN IN SECTION 8 SPINNING ABOUT AN AXIS TRANSVERSE TO

ITS LENGTH (S=8-8)

Page 49: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

C.P. No.!%3 533.6.013.12: 525.7: 523.4

THE AERODYNAMIC DRAG OF NEAR EARTH SATELLITES. Cook, G.E. Sept. 1959. THE AERODYNAMIC DRAG OF NUR GIRTH SATELLITES. Cook, G.E. Sept. 1959.

To determine the density Of the upper atmosphere from the Orbital motion To determine the density of the upper atmosphere from the orbital motion of a neiir earth satellite a knowledge of the satellite’s drag is required. of a near earth satellite a knowledge of the satellite! s drag is required. In this note, the drag of a SOdy fn free molecule flow, the flow regime In this note, the drag of a Sody in free mOlecule flow, the flow regime appropriate to a satellite in orbit, is discussed, and the molecular speed appropriate to a satellite in orbit, is discussed, and the molecular speed ratio is related to the properties of the upper atmosphere. The mechanism ratio is related t0 the properties Of the upper atmosphere. The mechanism of molecular reflection at the satelliteIs surface and the surface tempera- of molecular reflection at the satellitels surface and the surface tempera- ture are considered. The drag coefficients of some simple shapes are ture are considered. The drag coefficients of some simple shapes are quoted for appropriate molecular speed ratios, and the drag coefficients quoted for appropriate molecular speed ratios, and the drag coefficients are obtained for cylinders and a cone with axes inclined at any angle to are Obtained for cylinders and a cone with axes inclined at any angle to the direction of motion. the direction of motion.

+ C.F. No.523 533.6.013.12:

525.7: 523.4

C.P. No.523 533.6.Ou.12: 525.7: 523.4

THE AERODYNAMIC DRAG OF NUR EARTH SATELLITES. Cook, G.E. Sept. 1959. THE AERODYNAMIC DRAG OF NEAR EARTH SATaLITES. Cook, G.E. Sept. 1959.

To determine the density Of the upper atmosphere from the orbital motion of a near earth satellite a knowledge of the satellite~s drag 1s required. In this note, the drag Of a body fn free molecule flow, the flow regime appropriate to a satellite in orbit, is discussed, and the molecular speed ratio is related to the properties of the upper atmosphere. The mechanism of molecular reflection at the satellite’s surface and the surface tempera- ture are considered. The drag coefficients of some simple shapes are quoted for appropriate molecular speed ratios, and the drag coefficients are obtained for cylinders and a cone with axes inclined at any angle to the direction of motion.

TO determine the density Of the upper atmosphere from the orbital motion of a near earth satellite a knowledge of the satellitecs drag is required. In this note, the drag of a Sody in free molecule flow, the flow regime appropriate to a satellite In orSit, is discussed, and the molecular speed ratlo is related to the properties of the upper ritmosphere. The mechanism of molecular reflection at the satelliteIs surface and the surface tempera- ture are considered. The drag coefficients of some simple shapes are quoted for appropriate molecular speed ratios, and the drag coefficients are obtained for cylinders and a cone with axes inclined at any angle to the direction of motion.

Page 50: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook
Page 51: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook
Page 52: The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellitesnaca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/0523.pdf · 2013-12-05 · The Aerodynamic. Drag of Near Earth Satellites 3 bY G. E, Cook

C.P. No. 523

8 Crown Copyright 1960 Published by

HER MAJESTY’S STATIONERY OFFICE

To be purchased from. York House, Kingsway, London w.c.2

423 Oxford Street, London w.1 I,~A Castle Street, E$nburgh 2

109 St. Mary Street, Cardiff 39 King Street, Manchester 2 50 Fairfax Street, Bristol I

2 Edmund Street, Birmingham 3 80 Chichester Street, Belfast 1

or through any bookseller

Printed in England

S.O. &de No. 23-9012-23

C.P. No. 523