texas technological college the supreme court
TRANSCRIPT
TEXAS TECHNOLOGICAL COLLEGE
THE SUPREME COURT
BY
RANDOLPH L. HURST
Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Deqree of
Bachelor of Architecture in the Department of
. Architecture and Allied Arts Texas Technological College
Lubbock, Texas May, 1964
..-r-"1' J/
f"""f ' u '···' h! v, o . 2t?
PREFACE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Chapter
I. Historical introduction
Definition Ancient History Supreme Court History
• • • • • • • • • • • • •
History of Architecture in Washington
Page
iv
vi
1
II. Requirements of the Supreme Court ••• 10
The City of Washington Primary Considerations
Site Parking Personnel Daily Routine
Required Spaces Exa~ples
High Court - Chandigarh Supreme Court - Brazilia
. City Hall - Boston
III. Proposed Supreme Court •••••••••••••• 25
IV.
Statement of the Problem Solution Drawings
Conclusions • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 36
BIBLIOGRAPHY • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 3 8
PREFACE
"A Nation's Capitol should embody the finest in its contemporary architectural thought. Its architectural forms should reflect the dignity, enterpri~e, vigor and stability of our National Government."
For some reason, the design of most government buildings in America has lacked symbolism, and shown a lack of spirit which should be a prime consideration of the design concept. Why have we fallen behind in our development of government symbols?
The power of th2 qovernment has declined during the past 200 years. Another power, industry and business has taken over, and it is in this field that we have created our most impressive buildings. As a consequence, most of our government buildings today look very commercial in their exterior design. This only leaves one question, and that is: "What is government character in our country?"
Government character seems to be an elusive quality. We have the greatest democracy in history, and yet no symbolism of this government at all in our Federal City. There have been some good attempts, one by Frank Lloyd Wright in his Capitol of Arizona complex, and several other new embassy buildings to create "government character",. However, in Washington D.C., the seat of our National Government, there is no refreshing, new symbol of our great country.
I believe there were several fundamental thinas that contributed to the creation of "government character" in ancient times, and these things are just as important today as a design concept. First of all, a government building should be designated as "government" by being set apart from the things around it, such as being raised up on a platform. This will give the building the dignity and the nobility which it deserves. Second, the building itself should be constructed out
1John F. Kenn·edy, "A Message From The President" American Institute Of Architects J., (Jan. 1963), p. 25. -- --
2 Peter Blake, "What Is Government Character?",
Architeqtural Forum, (Jan. 1959), p. 77.
iv
of masonry materials which in itself means permanance, security, and monumentality. also, and just as important, the Supreme Court building should be pleasing and inspirational to view. These are the things that must be considered, along with the selection of a site worthy of the building, in order to achieve "government character".
v
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
Page 1. Plan, Basilica of Trajan-Rome •••••••••••• 4
2. High Court - Chandigarh •••••••••••••••••• 22
3. Supreme Court Building y . Era~ilia •••••••• 23
4. City Hall -Boston ••••••••••••••••••••••• 24
5. Site plan for the Supreme Court Building • 27
Definition
CHAPT~R I
HISTORICAL INTRODUCTION
The Supreme Court is the highest law in the land.
Article III, section 1 of the ~ Constitution of the
United States provides: •The judicial power of the
United States shall be vested in. one Supreme Court.•
The Supreme Court of the United States is distinctly
American in conception and function. 1 Being distinctly
American it should stand as a monument to the free,
democratic government under which we live.
The Supreme Court building should possess the dignity
and nobility required of a government building, and
yet have something to co.mmunicate to the society of
America. It is this communication that can make the
Supreme Court building a lasting symbol of justice
in America.
1charles E. Hughes, The Su~reme Court of the United · States, (New YorE; 19 8), p. I. -----
-1-
-2-
Ancient History
It has been said that •law, without an adequate
system of courts and without effective administration 1
is little better than no law at all," and as far back
into history as man can go, he can find proof that
ancient man realized this fact. Even as far back as
5000 B.C, provisions were made in the Babylonian law
for a system of courts and justice. Babylonian law 2
has sometimes been referred to as "the mother of law•
because it is from this civilization that our modern
law courts evolved.
Until the Romans developed their civilization, a court
system as we know it today did not exist. The Basilicas,
which the Romans built for the purpose of a hall of
justice,3included many of the requirements which are
used in our courthouses today. First of all, the
basilica had a library; also, they provided space
for the judges, as we do for our modern day juty and
Supreme Court Justices.
1charles Herman Kinnane, ~ First Book On AngloAmerican Law, (Indianapolis,-r9521; p. 176.
2 Ibid., p. 177.
3 . Sir Banister Fletcher, A HistorT Of Architecture
On The Comparative Method, New York, 1961), p. 201.
-3-
The basilicas and forums built by the Romans were
inspiring symbols of government, and have persisted 1
throughout the ages as government character.
Little did the Romans realize that in the 20th century
the form they had created in ancient days would still
be utilized by architects to ·build symbols of government.
1Peter Blake, •What Is Government Character?•, Architectural Forum, (January 1959), p. 78.
I .;. I
Tlfi~UiiAL. ,-errr JUOcioiS6 It rt o A<691f~oJre
• • • • • • .. • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • TI1'A.JArt 1e'
L. I 1!1 R' ,\ R.,... •• • •
•
• I:L I 6 .. If y I@
o~I.UMI1
• • • • • • • •
•
• • • • • • ••• •· . • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • •
• • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ! 11 ,. If 1a rt c: • Frrot-1 ~ o R' u M
• I I • • :1 !dL----·111 1111 • • • • IIi! 11W 1: •
•
• •
•
p L A 11 ~ A e L C A 0 p T rr A J A. N 11 o M e
T~l 15 U 11A L fQrf .JUO&f'lil AtfO Ae61qc;;;ol'f~
~
-5-
History of the Supreme Court
It is of little value to go into the experiences of
other countries and their judicial systems in order
to understand the historical background of the Supreme
Court of the United States. Aside from the Anglo-
Saxon tradition of law and judicial process, the
Supreme Court has very little in common with past
history.
A Federal judiciary was an essential part of the
conception of a national government of a Federal 1
type. It says in the constitution that there shall
be ~one Supreme Court,wand it has been the only high
court since it was founded in 1789. During the days
of the colonies, law and justice was administered by
a practice· carried over from England, and was fitted
to their needs by the legislature of each particular
colony. The judges were usually appointed by the
Crown of England, and many of them had no knowledge
of the law at all. Furthermore, there was no type
of Supreme Court in the colonies.
After the colonies had declared their independence,
lCharles E. Hughes, The Su~reme Court of the United States, (New York, 19 8), p. I. ------
-6-
they set up a government under the Articles of Con
federation. It was during the reiqn of these articles
that the leaders of our country became aware of the
necessity of defining and firmly establishing the
Federal judicial power.1
At the constitutional convention of 1787 the founders
of our government decided on one supreme tribunal,
and the provision made by the committee was as follows:
"The Judicial Power of the United States shall be
vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior
courts as shall, when necessary, from time to time 2
be constituted by the Cong ress of the United States."
Today, after many years of controversy, the Supreme
Court is the highest power of the Federal judicial
system. Its main purpose is to maintain balance
between State and Nation through the maintenance of 3
the rights and duties of individuals.
Supreme Court Buildings
The Supreme Court has had many different homes during
1 Charles E. Hughes, The Su~reme Court of the United States, (New YorE; 19 8), p. 8. -----
2 ~., p. 11.
3Ibid., p. 2.
-1-
its nearly 200 years of existance. The first term
of the Court was held in the Exchange on Broad Street
in New York City. When the Capitol moved to Philadelphia
so did the Supreme Court, and there it stayed in : the
old City Hall until 1800 when the Capitol moved to
Washington D.C. From this time until 1860, the Court
held sessions in various rooms in the basement of the
Capitol building, none of which were fitting for a
Supreme Court. The next home was the former quarters
of the United States Senate, and it was not until
1935 that the Supreme Court acquired a home of its
own opposite the National Capitol building.
-8-
History of Architecture in Washington
Washington, our National Capitol, must reflect in its
architecture the meaning of the United States and the 1
insurmountable greatness of our country.
To understand the history of architecture in Washington,
we must first try to understand a little bit of what
caused it. During the period in which the city of
Washington was being conceived and plans prepared,
very little was done in architecture, and thus, our
Capitol got off on the wrong foot. Around 1900, after
a sudden awakeninq, a commission was set up to invest-
igate the situation. Although they did modify several
areas, the Commission failed to come up with anything
new, so they stuck mainly to the original plan. As
a result, architects of today are still searching for
ways to improve our Capitol City.
Perhaps the best architecture in Washington are those
buildings which were inspired by Greek temples. But,
is this the kind of architecture we want in Washington?
Surely the buildings are a symbol of government and
very monumental, but still do they show the kind of
1 Roy F. Larson, "Federal Architecture", AmericaR
Institute of Architects J., (January, 1963), p. 94.
-9-
government we have. There has been a recent flood
of architecture in Washington, most of it bad. It
shows a lack of good design, and a great deal of
ignorance on the part of the government. Hardly
any of these new buildings show any continuity to
the already established city of Washington. Continuity
is an import·ant factor in the design of Federal buildings,
and can be achieved in a modern way. A building does
not have to be of the same style in order to achieve
continuity; there are other factors that can give
the same results. There should be a likeness in
materials for one thing , likewise scale, mass, color·,
and texture. By approaching continuity in this way,
the Federal buildings would have a personality of their
own and yet be in harmony with the existing architecture.
Washington is a treasure of historic buildings, shrines,
and museums, and it is essential that t hese be preserved
in all of their inspirational glory for other generations 1
to see, study, and appreciate. Today, we need more
imaginative and creative design for our Federal buildings.
Our new buildings must not reflect the past, but more
the future of our great country.
1Henry L. Wright, •The Architect And Washington•,
American Institute of Architects J., (Jan. 1963), p. 24.
CHAPTER II
REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUPREME COURT
The City of Washington
The Supreme Court of the United States is located in
Washington D.C.
It has been said that the city of Washington is many
cities in one, for it is a city of national government,
a city of world diplomacy, a city of shops and business,
and a city of historical memories. However, to many
Americans Washington is a monument, a place to visit,
with things to see and do. It is the home of exciti~g
international airports; furthermore, it is the home
of fine colleges, as well as the Smithsonian Institute,
an exhibit of the progress of American industry and
history, encompassing every aspect of American life
over two and a half centuries.
Each season in Washington brings new life to its
beautiful surroundings. The spring, which averages
about 55 degrees, brings the famed Japanese cherry
blossom into bloom. In the summer the average
temperature is about 77 degrees, then drops off to a
pleasant 56 degrees in autumn when the whole city is
painted in autumn colors. On the other hand, the
-10-
-11-
winter temperature hardly ever drops below the freezing
mark and maintains a brisk 37 degrees.
Primary Considerations
The Supreme Court building houses the highest court
in the United States. It is the symbol of justice
to people not only in the United States, but to free
pe9ple all over the world. Because of this, it must
be outstanding in its des-ign and transmit a feeling
of security to those who believe in it.
The site in itself is of areat importance to the -- ... success of the building . It must fit into the overall
plan for Washington, as well as the future plans.
Also, it should be easily reached from most government
buildings, and accessi.hle to the major transportation
systems used in Washington {air, bus, automobile, etc.).
The site should reflect in some way the position of
the Supreme Court as the third arm of government in
the United States.
Parking is an important factor in the design because
of the necess ity of the automobile. However, outside
"lots" tend to spoil the design of the building because
of their very pres~nce. In view of this, outside "lots"
should be used to a minimum. The parking requireme~ts
-12-
of the Supreme Court come under the following divisions:
Justices: Complete privacy is needed for the Justices upon their arrival and departure from the building. This suggests the possibility of underground parking a"t-1ay from the public.
Staff: There is no need for as much privacy as for the Justices, except for possibly the higher offices such as the Marshall, or the Attorney General. Outside parking should probably be considered in some cases.
Members of the Bar and Reporters: Adequate space muST ne-provided for the professional people who frequent the building . Besides members of the bar and reporters, there would be congressmen, law officers of the government, etc. They should have easy access in and out of -t he buildinq at all times. -
Visitors: Approximately 1000 people enter the Supreme Court building each day. This will necessitate parking space for them as well as for visitors to the courtroom when it is in session.
The Supreme Court houses a vast organization of people;
these people carry on their own functions independently
of each other in most cases. Even the Justices work
largely in isolation, except when they choose to seek
consultation with others. Only the messengers, page
boys, etc. go from organization to organization doing
work for their particular office. Therefore, the
personnel of the Supreme Court can be divided into
the following major parts: The Justices, the Marshal,
the Clerk, the Attorney General, the Solicitor General,
and the Librarian.
1h! Justices
There is one Chief Justice and eight Associate
Justices in the United States Supreme Court. Each
Justice has his own staff to carry out his own
individual activities. A staff consists of two clerks,
a secretary, and a page boy, or runner as he is more
commonly termed. The staff of each justice is the
same except for the Chief Justice who has a separate
office for a law clerk.
The Marshal
The Marshal of the Supreme Court has a suite of offices
occupied by his secretary, about three assistants each
with a secretary, and several runners and pages. His
office is the administrator of the Supreme Court.
The Clerk
The duty of the Olerk is to keep all records, reports,
etc., concerned with the Supreme Court. To ·-do this
his staff consists of his secretary, about 10 assistants,
and several stenographers available for any of their
use.
The Attorney General
The Attorney General of the United States has a small
staff consisting of himself and his secretary, and
-14-
an assistant and his secretary.
The Solicitor General
The Solicitor General also has a small staff consisting
of himself and his secretary, and an assistant with
a secretary.
The Librarian
The staff of the Supreme Court Library consist of a
librarian, an assistant, and several other library
workers.
Daily Proceedure
There is one session annually of the Supreme Court,
commencing the first Monday in October and lasting
until the last week in May of the following year.
Decisions of the Court are handed down on Mondays only.
Shortly before'noon, each day the Court is in session,
the Justices assemble in a small robing room, where
an attendant helps them into their robes. As each
Justice enters, he shakes hands with every other Justice,
a custom started more than half a century ago. This
was done in hopes that it would keep the Justices on
favorable terms. At exactly twelve noon, the crier,
being signaled that the Justices are approaching,
strides his gavel and calls, •The Honorable Chief Justice
-15-
and Associate Justices of the Supreme Court of the
United States:• Immediately, the Justices enter in
threes by seniority, and take their respective places.
The Judges hear arguments for two weeks, and then
separately study cases and write opinions for the
next two weeks. However, at 11 o'clock every Friday,
the Judges gather in their conference roo~, and as is
custom, again shake hands. This conference, where
they argue, consult, and decide on opinions usually
last from 6 to 8 hours. After a decision has been
reached, the Chief Justice assigns the case for opinion
to one of the members of the Court. The researching
and writing of an opinion is an intricate process,
usually taking about three weeks, but has been known
to take 5 or 6 months.
Lawyers may deal with the Court and with individual
Justices only through the clerk. Because of tradition,
the Justices never grant interviews, never discuss
politics, and never discuss cases with anyone except
their colleagues.
The inner organization and routine of the Court brings
all the Justices together on only two occasions: at
the public sessions, and at their secret conferences.
-16-
The Justices work quite a lot on their own, depending
on their staffs for assistance. As Justice Robert H.
Jackson said, •The fact is, that the Court functions
less as one deliberative body than as nine, each Justice
working largely in isolation except as he chooses to
seek consultation from others.•
The daily routine of the Justices cannot be complete·
without mention of the importance of privacy. They
must have complete privacy upon their arrival and
departure from the buildina, along with absolute
privacy away from the public at all times of the day.
This is the way of the Justices, and is by this rule
that they carry on their daily business.
-17-
Space Requirements
It is important that the function of each space be
considered in space arrangement because of the specific
requirements of some spaces. Generally, the space
requirements of the Supreme Court fall under four
.divisions. These divisions are as follows: the
courtroom, the Justices rooms, the offices, and the
library.
The courtroom is where the Justices hear the arguments
and where the biggest concentration of people occur.
Being the focal point of the building, the courtroom
must stand out in design and be the most exciting ' part of the building. It must be large enough to
provide for the Chief Justice, eight associate Justices,
court reporters, members of the bar, newspaper repor.ters,
and visitors to the Court. The courtroom shouid be
easily accessible from most all areas of the building
because it is around this Court that everything else
revolves.
The Justices work a great deal of the time in isolation.
They depend a great deal on their personal staff, and
on their freedom to move about without being disturbed.
Their work consist of hearing cases, writing opinions,
and handing down decisions. To do this a great amount
-18-
of study, research, and consultation is done on the
part of each Justice. Furthermore, their success
or failure depends a lot on being able to use the
Supreme Court building successfully.
The Justices should have a private means of entrance
to the courtroom and library, and should be able to
enter or leave the building at any time without being
noticed. Their suite of offices should provide enough
room for the staff with lounge and waitiRg areas
adjoining. Also the Justices need a conference room
for their private conferences, a robing room adjoining
the courtroom, a lounge with toilets, and a private
lunch room accessible to most of their spaces.
The offices of the Supreme Court include various
officials who have suites in this building, and
must be provided for. These officials include: the
Marshal of the Supreme Court, the Clerk of the Supreme
Court, the Attorney General of t he United States,
and the Solicitor General of the United States.
The Marshal of the Supreme Court is the administrator
of the Court. His activities consist mainly of
management of the building, keeping books, taking
care of visitors, etc. It is up to him and his staff
to see that everything is running properly and smoothly.
-19-
His needs are a suite near the courtroom which include
a general business office, a private office, and
several offices for his assistants.
The Clerk of the Supreme Court is in charge of all
records, reports, etc. of the Court. He deals directly
with the Justices and must keep them up to date when
ever necessary.
The staff of the Clerk is rather large in comparison
with the other officials; therefore, his space
requirements are larger. He needs a suite containing
a private office, several smaller offices for assistants,
room for stenographers, a large file room for current
records, and a library of records.
The Attorney General of the United States is the chief
law officer of our National Government~ He is the
head of the Department of Justice and responsible for
all activities within that department. His other duties
include a responsibility for the internal security of
the nation, ·and those ·of the legal advisor to the
President.
The space requirements of the Attorney General include
a private office, a business office, and an office
for the Assistant Attorney General.
The Solicitor General ranks next below the Attorney
General in the Justice Department. His chief
-20-
responsibilitys consist of conducting Federal cases
in the Supreme Court, and also deciding whether or
not Federal cases should be appealed from lower to
higher courts.
The space requirements of the Solicitor General are
the same as for the Attorney General. His suite
consist of a private office, a business office, and
an office for .his assistant.
The library of the Supreme Court has available
approximately 100,000 volumes. It is important that
provision must be made for future expansion to number
about 200,000 volumns. This library is used by the
pub~ic only with the permission of the Marshal. Also,-, ;
housed in the Supreme Court building is the Law Library
of the Library of Congress. This library has a
capacity of approximately 300,000 volumns and is open
to the Justices, members of Congress, mernbers.of the
Bar, law officers of the executive and other departments
of the government. Required along with adequate shelf
storage are reading rooms for Justices and members
of the Bar, general reading rooms, office of the librarian,
assistants office, and catalogue room.
Other required spaces
adequate toilets
-21-
room with lockers · for pages room with lockers for messengers large room for members of the bar with small offices
· for consultation and study. at least three rooms for reporters away from visitors room for the press (40 or 50 on Mondays} rooms for superintendent of building and grounds assembly rooms
CHAPTER III
PROGRAM
If we are to improve the quality of buildings in our
National Capitol, we must not rely on ancient forms
and character. Today, we need to create a symbol
of our .present day government with the knowledge
and the tools that we have a~ailable.
It is my purpose to design a United States Supreme
Court Building situated in our National Capitol.
Most of the architecture in Washington was borrowed
from past civilizations and it is time that we started
thinking more about t he results in the future. For
this and other reasons previously stated, I believe
that a new Supreme Court Building is a good place to
start a new concept of architectural design for
Washington.
-~-
-26-
Site
The present location of the Supreme Court is not
worthy of the highest court in the United States.
Therefore, it should be moved to a more suitable
location along the mall. There are several important
reasons that make this move necessary. One of the
most important of these is that it is out of the way
of the main stream of business. Somehow the ~upreme
Court Building wound up not as an intergral part of
the Capitol, but at the rear of the Capitol Building.
Because the Supreme Court is the third branch of our
government, its site should reflect this position.
Also, a new site would give the Court the visual
effect it should have. The Supreme Court should be
something to view, such as the Washington Monument,
or the White House. Therefore, it is quite evident
that this move would be advantageous both to the
Supreme Court and the Capitol area.
Space Requirements
1. Justices
-28-
Suite of offices for each justice Lobby for each suite Conference room with library Robing room Retiring room Private lunch room (20 prople) Waiting room adjacent to lunch room Rest rooms for Justices and staff Private means of entrance
2. Court Room
Ante room for members of the bar Ante room for the public Rest rooms Adequate space for as many as 400 attorneys and
visitors
3. Marshal
General Business office Private office Offices for assistants (2)
4. Clerk
Space for current records Private office Offices for assistants and stenographers (10) Large file room Library of Supreme Court reports
s. Members of the Bar
Large room close to court room Cloak room Small offices adjacent to large room
·6. Attorney General
Business office Private office Assistant's office
7. Solicitor General
Business office Private office Assistant's office
8. Library
-29-
Lavr Library - 200,000 volumns , Supreme Court Library - 100,000 volumns
Reading rooms (general and private} Office for librarian Office for assistant Catalogue room
9. Miscellaneous spaces
Public lobby areas Public rest rooms Reporters rooms (for writing and reporting news} maintenence rooms assembly:. rooms
-30-
Solution
I · felt like one of the prime considerations in the
design was the selection of a site suitable for our
Supreme Court. In order to obtain the visual eff ect
needed, I placed the building at the west end of
Constitution Avenue where it meets 23rd street. By
doing this, a triangle symbolizing our three governmental
bodies was formed consisting of the Capitol Buildin~
the White House, and the Supreme Court. This site
is worthy of the Supreme Court Building and would
add a great deal to the beautification of the mall.
Par~ing was another consideration that was important
. to the overall design of the building . The staff
parking was placed under the building mainly for
convenience of entering and leaving the building ,
and also to be used as a defense shelter. However,
the public must have the experience of .making a
grand approach to the building before entering it.
Therefore, the public lots were placed accross 23rd
street and tunnels provided to get the people accross
to the Supreme Court. I felt t hat the area around
the building should be kept as open as possible,
particularly that area between the Lincoln Memorial
and the Supreme Court. By placing the parking lots
-31-
in this area both objectives wexe solved; that is,
the grand approach and the open feeling.
The function of the Supreme Court Building is many
functions in one. Basically, however, everything
revolves around the Court. A symetrical plan was
used with all the f unctions grouped around two light
wells (also sculpture courts) which in turn were
placed on each side of the Court. To emphasize the
Court, it was raised two floors above ground level,
with this emphasis carried · through in the exterior
design. This syrnetrical plan also proved successful
in creating the privacy needed in the Justices area.
Privacy was a key factor in planning because of the
necessity for it. All public spaces and areas are
clearly defined and clearly accessib le from the public
lobby which is six feet above the g round floor, and
staff circulation is obtained t h rough private stairs,
corridors, and elevators·.
The exterior design of the Supreme Court Building
became important because of its monumental and
symbolizing effect on the public. Yet a certain amount
of dignity is required for this type of building.
I t hink this degnity was obtained mainly through the
-32-
use of material {marble) on the exterior, alona with
its symetrical appearance. A monumental effect was
obtained by raising the public entrance six feet above
the ground with columns running the full height of
the building. Emphasis of the Court was obtained by
using glass and being able to see the Court hanging
between the two massive elements on either side.
The structure is concrete construction with (in some
cases) precast-prestressed beams to span the Courtro~m.
Marble is used on the exterior along with exposed
concrete in some cases. The mechanical equipment was
zoned into two areas with two mechanical rooms in the
basement. These mechanical rooms are connected with
each floor with one vertical chas e on each side.
The design of the Supreme Court was a gradual process
of trial and error study on circulation with the
emphasis placed ·oh privacy·. The study developed into
a plan "'hich I think is a good, well organized design
of space arrangement, which was of foremost importance.
CHAPTER IV
CONCLUSIONS
It has been said that experience is the best teacher.
In a way, this thesis I have just como leted can be
thought of as an experience where many things were
learned.
First of all, designing a workable solution is much
harder than at first anticipated. I think this will
prove invaluable in the solving of future design
problems. Although we were allowed a shorter time
for solving the problem than those students in the
past and no model was required, I believe that the
problem was more demanding and harder to decide on
a solution.
Second, I found that everyone is of different
opinions, and it is hard to please everyone. We as
architects must make our own decisions, and carry on
with that idea in mind. To do this is sometimes hard,
but I believe the project would turn out for the best.
Third, a.fter research and study on this type of building,
I believe that a lot of work needs to be done in this
area of desion (government character). We have borrowed
our character from past civilizations and it is time
-36-
-37-
that something be done. Perhaps the best example of
government character in the United States today is
the new Boston City Hall. I believe that this building
truly expresses the idea of government character with
in a modern way~ and this is what we need. There are
too many poor examples of governm,ent character with
no spirit at all. If we are to progress at all,
we must progress in government design.
This was one of the basic reasons for this study, and
along with the others stated perhaps it will point
out the need for other such studies which I'm sure
will happen in the near future.
-38-
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Books
Federal Writers' Project. Washington, Ctt~ and Capitol. Washington: United States Governmen rinting Office, 1937.
Fletcher, Sir Banister. A Histor' of Architecture on the Comparative Methoa. New orE: Charles --Scribner's Sons, 1961.
Hughes, Charles Evans. States. New York:
The Su~reme Cou~t of the United ~uiDbia Universit~ress, 1928.
Kinnane, Charles Herman. A First Book on Anglo-American · Law. Indianapolis: rEe BObbs-Merriil CO. Inc., 1952.
Saloman, Leon I. The Supreme Court. Vol. 33, No. 1. New York: 196~
Periodicals
Blake, Peter, •New Symbols ot Governmentw, Architectural Forum, (January, 1963).
Blake, Peter, •What Is Government Character•, Architectural Forum, (January, 1963). ·
Kennedy, John F., •A: Message From The President•, American Institute of Architects I·, (January, 1963).
Kerr, Robert J. II, nHistoric Preservation in the Federal City•, American Institute of Architects J., (January, 1963).
Larson, Roy F., •Federal Architecturew, American Institute of Architects J., (January, 1963).
Wright, Henry L., •The Architect and Washington•, American Institute of Architects J., (January, 1963).
Encyclopedias
Meine, Fran~lin J. The American Peo~les Encyclopedia~ Vol. 18. Chicago:- The Spencer ress, Inc.~ 1954.
-39-
Documents
Senate Document No• 88. 76th Congress, 1st Session. Final Report of the United States Supreme Court Building. Washington: United States Government Printing Office, 1939.
United States Government Organization. National Archives and Federal Register. Washington: United States Government Printing Office, l9b3.
Correspondence
General Services Administration National Archives and Records Service Office of the Federal Register Washington 25, D.C.
Mr. J. George Stewart Architect of the Capitol Washington D.C.
United States Marshal United States Supreme Court Building 1 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C.
Unites States Geological Servey Destribution Section Silver Springs, Maryland
•
High Court
Chandigarh
This building, designed by Le Corbusier, symbolizes government character. Here he used concrete forms to express the stability and the security of the High Court . I t hink the buildinq is outstanding in its design and in the feeling that it creates.
-21-
I t-:1 w
"'-
/' ~ ----/ ....
"
Supreme Court
Br.azilia
- -·-- --·- - -~=----- -..·--
- - -... -- ~ ..... ... _ ..
This Supreme Court Building, designed by Nervi, is only one part of the governmental project at Brazilia. It is a clean, impressive design nearly opposite from Corbu's Chandigarh, but still symbolizing government character.
City Hall
Boston
I think this building is the bes t example ot government characte1 1n the United States. It is massive in f o rm and quite monumental; yet it has the dignity t hat it deserves. More of this type of design should be sought after for our government symbols.
-24-
J I d 'I (
' ,, ,:
!' •I
' ,,
• ~
t-
. s ..
lt . ii ~
b IU \-
0 -~ \)
~
~
-2fl ..
UNITED lfUIO Y l P!Uft'~T lo lfC:: II I T t<: T U If C. .of 6 .of T t.T A -, 'T"~ C:III! OG IIC l L c: li LL t ·~
,. I:T 1"'1 A I'i . . . .. .. ;: .......
STATES ·sUPREME COURT BUILDING
N
"'t
• I I I
OA~Ct.1tNT rLoorr I"L~n • • A L a lAo- ' • 1'..••
•
• r 1 r :1 J
y.:., r L o o r r l A n
.. "" ~
T M I ~· . ?. .. . . . ~ . rL o o rr p L A n
fl1 [I]
~ r L n L o o li'
I
!:! f c 0 n o
. ~- 1 ~ .. . ~ ..
f •' - ~·-··
~ D c
~~ ~~-.... ----
l?r.··:: ... ~--U•Lf
.. •·j • ~· " ·· - 6L ... • • • t- -
• • • " & •T' • •• .. ... ~.. .... .......
...
I
/
.. .. . . . "": ··:
I - . ...... -
•• •·· .,f
. ... :~~· .··: ..... ,.~ ....... _, ..
•• • ... *: •
L I r-11 I '
,J
I ...... d ~ I • I~ fit ~ l ' I ~· .. "- I 0,. . 1'1,. I ~
! . . . . . . . , .. , .... -::r ··""-"'-~ • ~ r I • £>. l 1------ - --
: ~ ~ ':. '· . "t ......... ·-· \_ . . . ,., ,. .. ., .. •• 1'1 ~ ...
: .
ROit Tit t. L.&.'I IoT I • n . . .. .. . , .... ,_ ..
g 6 .I
- . c::::::::::..,.L; I ___:__..:..__:__.:._;....· ;: ..:..._:_,· .. ;...:........:... : ·_: :~: ··;...:.......:.._· .---r! _:__:_~ .' :-:.~: ::__:_.: .. · .. __j. , •• rL..-J-.·;1 ______::,_"" _[~-----
-------------------------------------~-• < < T I I D - D
~ .... · .'· .... :: •• •• .. f .':' • •• / .. . ~ ..... • ...
.· . ~ ;. ~ :
...... • ·•• t--fil"' .....
1+---1---'""-"''='"' f'AJI, ....
~· -4' ... ' .......
I