tail dependence models for risk management...c f. durante (unisalento) tail dependence for risk...

30
Tail Dependence Models for Risk Management Fabrizio Durante Dipartimento di Scienze dell’Economia Università del Salento, Lecce, Italy [email protected] sites.google.com/site/fbdurante IVASS, Rome, July 2017 c F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 1 / 30

Upload: others

Post on 26-Jun-2020

9 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Tail Dependence Models for Risk Management...c F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 6 / 30 Tail concentration for popular families of copulas Tail concentration

Tail Dependence Models forRisk Management

Fabrizio Durante

Dipartimento di Scienze dell’EconomiaUniversità del Salento, Lecce, Italy

[email protected]/site/fbdurante

IVASS, Rome, July 2017

c© F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 1 / 30

Page 2: Tail Dependence Models for Risk Management...c F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 6 / 30 Tail concentration for popular families of copulas Tail concentration

The general framework

Given

Risk (random) factors X = (X1, . . . ,Xd) ∼ F, where

F(x1, . . . , xd) = P(X1 ≤ x1, . . . ,Xd ≤ xd)

A financial position ψ(X)

A risk measure/pricing function: ρ

Our goal is to

calculate ρ(ψ(X))

Warning: ρ(ψ(X)) depends on the joint distribution function FX of X and,especially, on its behavior in the tails.

c© F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 2 / 30

Page 3: Tail Dependence Models for Risk Management...c F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 6 / 30 Tail concentration for popular families of copulas Tail concentration

Current practiceGiven some risk factors X = (X1, . . . ,Xd), we proceed as follow:

First, estimate the marginal behavior Fi of each Xi, i.e.

Fi(x) = P(Xi ≤ x).

Find a copula C (i.e. a d.f. with uniform marginals) such that

X ∼ F(x1, . . . , xd) = C(F1(x1), . . . ,Fd(xd)).

Estimate ρ(ψ(X)) either analytically or by means of a MC simulationfrom the probability d.f. F of X.

It is necessary to construct dependency models that reflect observed and expected de-pendencies without formalizing the structure of those dependencies with cause-effectmodels. The theory of copulas provides a comprehensive modelling tool that can re-flect dependencies in a very flexible way.

International Actuarial Association, 2004

c© F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 3 / 30

Page 4: Tail Dependence Models for Risk Management...c F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 6 / 30 Tail concentration for popular families of copulas Tail concentration

Bivariate sample clouds from the d.f. F = C(F1, F2) where F1, F2 ∼ N(0, 1), while C comes from different copula families.

c© F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 4 / 30

Page 5: Tail Dependence Models for Risk Management...c F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 6 / 30 Tail concentration for popular families of copulas Tail concentration

Tail dependence coefficients

Let X and Y be continuous r.v.’s with d.f.’s FX and FY , respectively. The uppertail dependence coefficient λU of (X,Y) is defined by

λU = limt→1−

P(

Y > F(−1)Y (t) | X > F(−1)

X (t))

;

and the lower tail dependence coefficient λL of (X,Y) is defined by

λL = limt→0+

P(

Y ≤ F(−1)Y (t) | X ≤ F(−1)

X (t))

;

provided that the above limits exist.(Sibuya, 1960; Joe, 1993)

TDC’s can be calculated from the copula C of (X,Y); in fact,

λL = limt→0+

C(t, t)t

and λU = limt→1−

1− 2t + C(t, t)1− t

.

c© F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 5 / 30

Page 6: Tail Dependence Models for Risk Management...c F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 6 / 30 Tail concentration for popular families of copulas Tail concentration

Tail concentration function

An auxiliary function that may serve to visualize the tail dependence of acopula C is the so–called tail concentration function, defined as the functionqC : (0, 1)→ [0, 1] given by

qC(t) = qL(t) · 1(0,0.5](t) + qU(t) · 1(0.5,1)(t),

where

qL(t) =C(t, t)

t, qU(t) =

1− 2t + C(t, t)1− t

.

(Venter, 2001; D., Fernández-Sánchez and Pappadà, 2015)

Notice that:

if C is the comonotonicity copula (positive monotone dependence), thenqC = 1;

qC(0.5) = (1 + βC)/2, where βC = 4C(0.5, 0.5) − 1 is the Blomqvist’smeasure of association related to C.

c© F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 6 / 30

Page 7: Tail Dependence Models for Risk Management...c F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 6 / 30 Tail concentration for popular families of copulas Tail concentration

Tail concentration for popular families of copulas

Tail concentration function for various families of copulas with zero LTDC and UTDC (left) and with possibly non-zero LTDC or UTDC (right).

c© F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 7 / 30

Page 8: Tail Dependence Models for Risk Management...c F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 6 / 30 Tail concentration for popular families of copulas Tail concentration

Tail concentration for patchwork copulas

Tail concentration functions for copulas obtained via patchwork methods.

c© F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 8 / 30

Page 9: Tail Dependence Models for Risk Management...c F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 6 / 30 Tail concentration for popular families of copulas Tail concentration

Outline

1 Patchwork Copulas and Tail Dependence

2 Graphical Tool for Copula Selection

c© F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 9 / 30

Page 10: Tail Dependence Models for Risk Management...c F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 6 / 30 Tail concentration for popular families of copulas Tail concentration

The main ideaA patchwork copula derived from a fixed copula C is any copula C̃ such that:

C̃ = C on [0, 1]d \ ∪iBi,

where each Bi ⊆ [0, 1]d is a d–dimensional box in which the probability massof C̃ is distributed according to another copula Ci.

〈C1〉〈C2〉

C

0 1

1

Applications:Modification of tail dependence behaviourApproximation of copulas

Patchwork copulas include ordinal sums, multilinear copula extensions, Bernstein copulas, glu-

ing copulas, upper comonotonicity, etc.c© F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 10 / 30

Page 11: Tail Dependence Models for Risk Management...c F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 6 / 30 Tail concentration for popular families of copulas Tail concentration

Patchwork copulas

Let C and CB be d–dimensional copulas and let B = [a,b] be a non-empty boxcontained in Id such that PC(B) = α > 0. The function C∗ : Id → I given by

C∗(u) = PC ([0,u] ∩ Bc) + αCB

(F̃1

B(u1), . . . , F̃dB(ud)

)is a copula, where, for every xi ∈ [ai, bi],

F̃iB(xi) =

1αPC ([a1, b1]× · · · × [ai−1, bi−1]× [ai, xi]× [ai+1, bi+1]× · · · × [ad, bd]) .

The copula C∗ is called patchwork of (B,CB) into C and it is denoted by thesymbol C∗ = 〈B,CB〉C.

(D., Fernández–Sánchez and Sempi, 2013)

c© F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 11 / 30

Page 12: Tail Dependence Models for Risk Management...c F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 6 / 30 Tail concentration for popular families of copulas Tail concentration

Patchwork copulas: simulation

Consider the patchwork C∗ = 〈B,CB〉C, where B = [a, 1].

An algorithm for generating a random sample from C∗ goes as follows.

Algorithm

1 Generate u from the copula C.2 If u ∈ B, then

1 Generate v from the copula CB.2 For i = 1, 2, . . . , d set wi = (F̃i

B)−1(vi).

Otherwise, set w = u.3 Return w.

It can be used for “stress testing” the tail of the distribution.

c© F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 12 / 30

Page 13: Tail Dependence Models for Risk Management...c F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 6 / 30 Tail concentration for popular families of copulas Tail concentration

Patchwork copulas: simulation

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●● ●

●●

● ●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●● ●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

● ●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

● ●

●●

●●

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

U

V

● ●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

● ●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

UV

Random sample of 2500 realizations from the Frank copula with τ = 0.50 (left) the copula 〈B, CB〉C where B = [0.50, 1]2 , C is the Frankcopula with τ = 0.50 and CB is the Gumbel copula with τ = 0.50.

c© F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 13 / 30

Page 14: Tail Dependence Models for Risk Management...c F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 6 / 30 Tail concentration for popular families of copulas Tail concentration

Patchwork copulas: simulation

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

t

TC

F

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

tT

CF

Tail concentration function from random sample of 2500 realizations from the Frank copula with τ = 0.50 (left) the copula 〈B, CB〉C whereB = [0.50, 1]2 , C is the Frank copula with τ = 0.50 and CB is the Gumbel copula with τ = 0.50.

c© F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 14 / 30

Page 15: Tail Dependence Models for Risk Management...c F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 6 / 30 Tail concentration for popular families of copulas Tail concentration

Application: VaR and subadditivity

Consider two random losses L1 and L2 such that L1 = f (L2) a.e. for somestrictly increasing function f , i.e. they are comonotone and their copula isM2(u, v) = min{u, v}.Then

VaRα(L1 + L2) = VaRα(L1) + VaRα(L2).

However, it is not true that VaRα is subadditive, i.e. for all losses L1,L2

VaRα(L1 + L2) ≤ VaRα(L1) + VaRα(L2).

In fact,

sup{VaRα(L1 + L2) : L1,L2 fixed } ≥ VaRα(L1) + VaRα(L2).

Subadditivity reflects the idea that risk can be reduced by diversification.

c© F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 15 / 30

Page 16: Tail Dependence Models for Risk Management...c F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 6 / 30 Tail concentration for popular families of copulas Tail concentration

Illustration: worst-case VaR copula for d = 2

α

α

α

α

Scatter plot from a comonotone copula (left) and from the copula giving the worst-case VaR(right). The copula for the right figure is based on works by Makarov (1981) and Rüschendorf(1982).

c© F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 16 / 30

Page 17: Tail Dependence Models for Risk Management...c F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 6 / 30 Tail concentration for popular families of copulas Tail concentration

Illustration: worst-case VaR scenario

τ = 1 τ = 0.50 τ = 0.00 τ = −0.50 τ = −1

VaRα(LC∗

1 ,LC∗

2 ) 2.5631 2.5663 2.5749 3.0340 3.2897

Numerical approximation of VaR0.90(LC∗1 , LC∗

2 ) where L1, L2,∼ N(0, 1), C∗ = 〈[0.90, 1]2,CB〉M2 for a

Clayton copula CB with Kendall’s τ equal to the indicated value. Results based on 106 simulation from the

given copula. The value corresponding to τ = −1 is the worst-case VaR scenario. The value corresponding

to τ = 1 is the comonotonic scenario.

c© F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 17 / 30

Page 18: Tail Dependence Models for Risk Management...c F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 6 / 30 Tail concentration for popular families of copulas Tail concentration

Outline

1 Patchwork Copulas and Tail Dependence

2 Graphical Tool for Copula Selection

c© F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 18 / 30

Page 19: Tail Dependence Models for Risk Management...c F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 6 / 30 Tail concentration for popular families of copulas Tail concentration

The goal

The aim is to ease the selection of the best copula that can be fitted to a randomsample (Xi,Yi)i=1,...,n starting from of a large number of possible parametricfamilies. The “goodness criterion” depends on the tail dependence.

The procedure goes as follows:

Consider a set of parametric copula models C1, . . . ,Ck that may be appro-priate for describing the unknown dependence structure in the given data,i.e. the so-called copula-test space.

(Michiels and De Schepper, 2008, 2013)

Find of a (tail-dependence driven) 2D visualization of the copula-testspace associated to a given dataset, and use it as the first step of modelbuilding.

(D., Fernández-Sánchez and Pappadà, 2015; Pappadà, D. and Torelli, 2017)

c© F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 19 / 30

Page 20: Tail Dependence Models for Risk Management...c F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 6 / 30 Tail concentration for popular families of copulas Tail concentration

The Algorithm

Let (Xi,Yi)i=1,...,n be a bivariate sample from an unknown copula.

1. Consider a set of k parametric copulas C1,C2, . . . ,Ck in the copula-testspace that have been fitted to the available data.

2. Calculate a distance between the empirical copula Cn and Ci (i = 1, . . . , k)as

σ(Cn,Ci) =

∫ b

a(qCn(t)− qCi(t))2 dt

I qCn is the empirical TCF given by

qCn(t) =Cn(t, t)

t· 1(0,0.5)(t) +

1− 2t + Cn(t, t)1− t

· 1[0.5,1)(t)

I qCi is the TCF associated with Ci.

c© F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 20 / 30

Page 21: Tail Dependence Models for Risk Management...c F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 6 / 30 Tail concentration for popular families of copulas Tail concentration

The Algorithm

3. Calculate a distance between the i–th and the j–th copula in the copulatest space via

σ(Ci,Cj) =

∫ b

a

(qCi(t)− qCj(t)

)2 dt

for 1 ≤ i 6= j ≤ k.

4. Construct the distance matrix ∆ = (σij), of order (k + 1), with elements

σ1j =σ(Cn,Cj−1), j = 2, . . . , k + 1

σij =σ(Ci−1,Cj−1), i, j = 2, . . . , k + 1, i < j

σii =0, i = 1, . . . , k + 1

c© F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 21 / 30

Page 22: Tail Dependence Models for Risk Management...c F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 6 / 30 Tail concentration for popular families of copulas Tail concentration

The Algorithm

5. Perform a non-metric scaling on ∆ to find a low-dimensional map onwhich the inter-points distances dij’s are as close as possible to the originalσij’s

I a monotonic transformation of the dissimilarities is calculated, which yields thedisparities d̂ij, such that the d̂ij*s and the σij’s have the same rank order

I the optimum configuration is determined by minimising Kruskal’s stress

s =

√√√√∑i<j(d̂ij − dij)2∑

i<j d2ij

6. Visualize the resulting set of k + 1 points p1, . . . , pk+1, in theq–dimensional Euclidean space, q ∈ {1, 2, . . . , k}

c© F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 22 / 30

Page 23: Tail Dependence Models for Risk Management...c F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 6 / 30 Tail concentration for popular families of copulas Tail concentration

Illustration: MSCI Index DataWe use Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) Developed Markets In-dex, which measures the equity market performance of 23 developed markets(daily observations from 2002-06-04 to 2010-06-10).

Preliminary steps:

We fit a convenient ARMA-GARCH model to each time series to remove possi-ble (conditional) mean and variance effects.

We extract the pseudo–observations from the fitted residuals of the univariatetime series focusing, hence, on the copula among the innovations of the series.

We select a convenient copula-test space given by:C1 = Clayton, Archimedean C2 = Gumbel, Archimedean + EVC3 = Frank, Archimedean C4 = NormalC5 = Joe, Archimedean C6 = PlackettC7 = Galambos, EV C8 = Student’s t, 4 dfC9 = Student’s t , 8 df C10 = Survival GumbelC11 = Survival Clayton C12 = Survival Joe

c© F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 23 / 30

Page 24: Tail Dependence Models for Risk Management...c F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 6 / 30 Tail concentration for popular families of copulas Tail concentration

Illustration: MSCI Index Data

Empirical TCF (left) and two-dimensional representation of goodness-of-fit New Zealand–HongKong dependence structure, based on lower TCF (right). The estimated τ -value equals 0.1639.

c© F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 24 / 30

Page 25: Tail Dependence Models for Risk Management...c F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 6 / 30 Tail concentration for popular families of copulas Tail concentration

Illustration: MSCI Index Data

Pairs plots for a three dimensional dataset of MSCI Indices. Lower panels display the values of Kendall’ tau. Upper panels display the

2–dimensional TDC representation.

c© F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 25 / 30

Page 26: Tail Dependence Models for Risk Management...c F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 6 / 30 Tail concentration for popular families of copulas Tail concentration

The Algorithm: finite-sample performances

C1(T) C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8

0.00

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

0.06

0.07

τ = 0.25

C1(T) C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

τ = 0.5

C1(T) C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8

0.00

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

0.06

τ = 0.75

C1 C2(T) C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8

0.00

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

C1 C2(T) C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

C1 C2(T) C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

Dissimilarities based on lower TCF between the empirical and the fitted copula–Clayton (C1), Gumbel (C2), Frank (C3), Gaussian (C4),Plackett (C5), Galambos (C6), Student-t, ν = 4 (C7), Surv. Gumbel (C8)–when the “true” model is Clayton (in the first row) and Gumbel (inthe second row), respectively. Sample size n = 250.

c© F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 26 / 30

Page 27: Tail Dependence Models for Risk Management...c F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 6 / 30 Tail concentration for popular families of copulas Tail concentration

A related algorithm: Tail dependence-based clusteringIn a similar spirit, an interesting way to visualize the relationships betweenobserved variables is to determine clusters of homogeneous variables as a pre-liminary step of high–dimensional models (e.g., factor models, hierarchicalmodels, etc.)

The main feature of this approach has three main steps:1 Determine a marginal distribution for each risk (in case of time series

data).2 Fix a copula-based measure of extreme dependence, which can be also

estimated non-parametrically, for each pair of risks. For instance:

σij = ‖qijemp − qM2‖,

where qM2 is the TCF of the comonotone copula M2 and ‖ · ‖ any conve-nient norm.

3 Find a hierarchical structure with “bottom up” approach.

(D., Pappadà, Torelli, 2014; 2015)

c© F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 27 / 30

Page 28: Tail Dependence Models for Risk Management...c F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 6 / 30 Tail concentration for popular families of copulas Tail concentration

Illustration: MSCI Index Data

SPAINPORTUGAL

NETHERLANDSIRELAND

HONG.KONGFINLANDBELGIUM

SWITZERLANDSWEDEN

SINGAPORENORWAY

NEW.ZEALANDITALY

GREECEFRANCE

DENMARKAUSTRIA

UKGERMANY

CANADAAUSTRALIA

USAJAPAN

JAPA

NU

SA

AU

ST

RA

LIA

CA

NA

DA

GE

RM

AN

YU

KA

US

TR

IAD

EN

MA

RK

FR

AN

CE

GR

EE

CE

ITA

LYN

EW

.ZE

ALA

ND

NO

RW

AYS

ING

AP

OR

ES

WE

DE

NS

WIT

ZE

RLA

ND

BE

LGIU

MF

INLA

ND

HO

NG

.KO

NG

IRE

LAN

DN

ET

HE

RLA

ND

SP

OR

TU

GA

LS

PAIN

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

US

AC

AN

AD

A JAPA

NS

ING

AP

OR

EH

ON

G.K

ON

GA

US

TR

ALI

AN

EW

.ZE

ALA

ND

GR

EE

CE

SW

ITZ

ER

LAN

DB

ELG

IUM

UK

NE

TH

ER

LAN

DS

GE

RM

AN

YF

RA

NC

EIT

ALY

SPA

INS

WE

DE

NF

INLA

ND

AU

ST

RIA

DE

NM

AR

KN

OR

WAY

IRE

LAN

DP

OR

TU

GA

L

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

Cluster DendrogramMSCI World Index

Heat map matrix of dissimilarities (left) and dendrogram resulting from hierarchical clustering for the MSCI World Index Data according to

complete linkage (right).

c© F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 28 / 30

Page 29: Tail Dependence Models for Risk Management...c F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 6 / 30 Tail concentration for popular families of copulas Tail concentration

Concluding remarks

We have presented the tail dependence coefficients and show some of theirfeatures via patchwork constructions.

We have introduced a copula-based graphical tool to visualize the goodness-of-fit of a collection of parametric copula models at once.

The given tool is based on a suitable measure of finite tail dependence infunctional form, thus providing valuable indications for the choice of acopula model when the tail behaviour is of primary interest.

A related method helps performing a cluster analysis of time series inorder to detect groups of variables exhibiting higher association in thetails.

c© F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 29 / 30

Page 30: Tail Dependence Models for Risk Management...c F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 6 / 30 Tail concentration for popular families of copulas Tail concentration

Questions? Comments?

Thanks for your attention!

F. Durante and C. Sempi. Principles of Copula Theory. CRC/Chapman & Hall,Boca Raton, FL, 2016.

F. Durante, J. Fernández-Sánchez, and C. Sempi. Multivariate patchwork cop-ulas: a unified approach with applications to partial comonotonicity. InsuranceMath. Econom., 53(3):897–905, 2013.F. Durante, J. Fernández-Sánchez, and R. Pappadà. Copulas, diagonals and taildependence. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 264:22–41, 2015.F. Durante, R. Pappadà, and N. Torelli. Clustering of time series via non–parametric tail dependence estimation. Statist. Papers, 56(3):701–721, 2015.

R. Pappadà, F. Durante, and N. Torelli. A graphical tool for copula selectionbased on tail dependence. In F. Mola, C. Conversano, and M. Vichi, editors,Classification, (Big) Data Analysis and Statistical Learning. Springer Interna-tional Publishing, 2017.

c© F. Durante (UniSalento) Tail Dependence for Risk Management 30 / 30