symmetry vs. chaos * in nuclear collective dynamics signatures & consequences pavel cejnar...
Post on 22-Dec-2015
219 views
TRANSCRIPT
Symmetry vs. Chaos *
in nuclear collective dynamics
signatures & consequences
Pavel CejnarInstitute of Particle and Nuclear PhysicsFaculty of Mathematics and Physics Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
cejnar @ ipnp.troja.mff.cuni.cz
Kazimierz 2010
1/15
* According to Empedocles (cca.490-430 BC), the real world, Cosmos, is an interference of Sphairos, an exquisite world of perfect order originating in symmetry, and Chaos, a world of complete disorder which results from a lack of symmetry.
Invariant symmetryÞ commutation of Hamiltonian
with generators of a certain group (group of invariant symmetry)
Þ conservation laws
2/15
Breakdown of dynamical symmetry
Signatures of symmetry do not vanish instantly:
Quasi dynamical symmetry (Rowe… 1988…)The actual dynamical symmetry of the system is broken but the system partly behaves as if the symmetry were effectively preserved.
Partial dynamical symmetry (Leviatan… 1992…)All conserved quantum numbers preserved for a part of states or a part of conserved quantum numbers preserved for all states. All kinds of dynamical symmetry
relevant in physics of nuclear collective motions. These motions are therefore mostly thought to be regular...
Symmetry
Breakdown of integrability
Regular character of classical motions is preserved for some orbits: KAM theorem (Kolmogorov, Arnold, Moser 1954-63)Þ “quasi integrability”Þ “partial regularity”
Dynamical symmetryÞ symmetry of a particular system with respect to
a dynamical group – a higher group than the one following from the invariance requirements
Þ invariant symmetry with respect to the dynamical group can be broken, but a number of motion integrals remains preserved
Þ dynamical symmetry integrability
perfect order
Quantum chaosÞ no genuinely quantum definition of chaos
(linearity & quasi periodicity of quantum mechanics)
Þ chaos studied in connection with classical limitÞ Bohigas conjecture (1984): Chaos on
quantum level affects statistical properties of discrete energy spectra. Chaotic systems yield spectral correlations consistent with Gaussian random matrix model.
Classical chaosÞ exponential sensitivity to initial
conditions (“butterfly wing effect”)Þ practical loss of predictabilityÞ quasi ergodic trajectories in the
phase space
Chaos
ω=0.62
Nuclei show neat signatures of quantum chaos!• data from neutron and
proton resonances: Bohigas, Haq, Pandey (1983)
• ensemble of low-energy levels: Von Egidy et al. (1987)
(Wigner)
112 )(
Nearest-neighbor spacing
1
1
ii
iii EE
EEs
Brody distribution interpolates between Poisson (ω=0) … orderWigner (ω=1) … chaos
1
e)(
sssP
3/15
1) Single-particle dynamics Nucleonic motions in deformed nuclear potentials
?
Origin of chaos in atomic nuclei
2) Collective dynamics Nuclear vibrations and rotations
a) Interacting Boson Model (IBM) Iachello, Arima 1975
• Alhassid, Whelan, Novoselsky: PRL 65, 2971 (1990); PRC 43, 2637 (1991); PRC 45, 1677 (1992); PRL 67, 816 (1991); NPA 556, 42 (1993)
• Paar, Vorkapic, Dieperink: PLB 205, 7 (1988); PRC 41, 2397 (1990), PRL 69, 2184 (1992)• Mizusaki et al.: PLB 269, 6 (1991) • Canetta, Maino: PLB 483, 55 (2000)• Cejnar, Jolie, Macek, Casten, Dobeš, Stránský: PLB 420, 241 (1998); PRE 58, 387 (1998); PRL 93,
132501 (2004); PRC 75, 064318 (2007), PRC 80, 014319 (2009), PRC 82, 014308 (2010), PRL 105, 072503 (2010)
b) Geometric Collective Model (GCM) Bohr 1952
• Cejnar, Stránský, Kurian, Hruška: PRL 93, 102502 (2004); PRC 74, 014306 (2006); PRE 79, 046202 (2009), PRE 79, 066201 (2009), JP Conf.Ser. 239, 012002 (2010)
• Arvieu, Brut, Carbonell, Touchard: PRA 35, 2389 (1987)• Rozmej, Arvieu: NPA 545, C497 (1992)• Heiss, Nazmitdinov, Radu: PRL 72, 2351 (1994); PRL 73, 1235 (1994); PRC 52, 3032
(1995)
Many-body dynamics Complex interactions of all particles in the nucleustoo difficult => two complementary simplifications:
4/15
Angular momentum → 0
.....][5][2
35][5.....][
2
5 2)0()0()2()0()0( CBAK
H
)1(* ][10 mm iJ
Geometric Collective Model
V
T
zyx
CBAK
JH ...3cos...
2
1
),(2432
2
22
,,
2'
rot
22vib 2
1yxK
T
Þ effectively 2D system
PAS2 |Re2sin yPrincipal Axes System
PAS0 |Recos x
Shape variables
…corresponding tensor of momenta
quadrupole tensor of collective coordinates ( 2 shape + 3 Euler angles = 5D )
Hamiltonian
A. Bohr 1952Gneuss et al. 1969
neglect …
5/15
x
y
Geometric Collective Model
neglect higher-order terms
…corresponding tensor of momenta
quadrupole tensor of collective coordinates ( 2 shape + 3 Euler angles = 5D )
.....][5][2
35][5.....][
2
5 2)0()0()2()0()0( CBAK
H
PAS2 |Re2sin yPrincipal Axes System
PAS0 |Recos x
A. Bohr 1952Gneuss et al. 1969
x
y
Hamiltonian
V
T
zyx
CBAK
JH ...3cos...
2
1
),(2432
2
22
,,
2'
rot
22vib 2
1yxK
T
sphericalprolate
oblate
B
AC >0
Shape-phase diagram
Shape variables
neglect …
5/15
.....][5][2
35][5.....][
2
5 2)0()0()2()0()0( CBAK
H
independent scales
energy time coordinates
External parameters
ACB2
… but a fixed value of Planck constant
K
2
1) “shape” parameter
2) “classicality” parameter
path crossing all parabolas Þ all equivalent classes of Hamiltonians
integrability
Geometric Collective Model
Two essential parameters
B
A
prolate
oblate
spherical
C >0
Hamiltonian
Stránský, Cejnar… 2004 ……. 2010
neglect …
6/15
Geometric Collective Model
totregreg /f
chaos order
Stránský, Cejnar… 2004 ……. 2010
Classical chaos
Regular phase space fraction
map of the degree of chaos
7/15
Geometric Collective Model
totregreg /f
chaos order
Stránský, Cejnar… 2004 ……. 2010
Classical chaos
Regular phase space fraction
map of the degree of chaos
7/15
x
y
x
y
x
y
x
y
convex
concave
convex
concave
change of the shape of the border of the accessible domain in the xy plane
Classical chaos
J = 0, E = 0, A = −5.05, B = C = K = 1
50,000 passages of 52 randomly chosen trajectories throughthe section y=0
Geometric Collective Model
x
yx
Stránský, Cejnar… 2004 ……. 2010
Poincaré section
examples of trajectories and a Poincaré section
x
8/15
J = 0
2
22
22vib
21
21
K
KT yx
Two quantization options
432
2222322
3cos
)()3()(
CBA
yxCxyxByxAV
(a) 2D system (b) 5D system restricted to 2D (true geometric model of nuclei)
H
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
22
vib
112
2
K
yxKT
3sin
3sin11
2 24
4
2
vib KT
The 2 options differ also in the metric (measure) for calculating matrix elements.
► Possibility to test Bohigas conjecture in different quantization schemes.
with additional constraints
(to avoid quasi-degeneracies due to the symmetry of V)
),(),(
),(),( 32
k
even / odd
K
2 classicality parameter
Geometric Collective ModelStránský, Cejnar… 2004 ……. 2010
Quantum chaos
9/15
Geometric Collective ModelStránský, Cejnar… 2004 ……. 2010
Quantum chaoscomparison of classical and quantal measures
freg … classical regular fraction 1−ω … adjunct of Brody parameter
10/15
1) Quasi-2D angular momentum
2) Hamiltonian perturbation
Choice of P
Geometric Collective ModelStránský, Cejnar… 2004 ……. 2010
Quantum chaosdeparture from integrable regime
2) <H’>
1) <L2>
11/15
iii PP
iE
Visual method by A. Peres (1984)
B=0.62
Geometric Collective ModelStránský, Cejnar… 2004 ……. 2010
Quantum chaos
1) <L2>
complex mixture of regular and chaotic patterns: ordered vs. chaotic states
2) <H’>
12/15
Visual method by A. Peres (1984)
■ ● ♦
B=0.62
Geometric Collective ModelStránský, Cejnar… 2004 ……. 2010
Quantum chaoscomplex mixture of regular and chaotic patterns: ordered vs. chaotic states
1) <L2>
2) <H’>
12/15
Visual method by A. Peres (1984)
Macek, Cejnar, Jolie… 200713/15
B
ddn~
d
)()(1
),(2d QQ
Nn
NH
)2(]~
[~
)( dddssdQ
Interacting Boson ModelMore than 1 classical control parameter
But there exist regions of almost full compatibility
Þ multi-dimensional chaotic map.
J = 0, E = 0
integrableregime
with the GCM.
Interacting Boson ModelMacek, Dobeš, Cejnar… 201014/15
Consequences of regularity for the adiabatic separation of intrinsic and collective motions: rotational bands exist even at very high excitation energies if the corresponding region of the J =0 spectrum is regular.
• Product of 0+-2+ and 0+-4+
correlation coefficients for intrinsic wave
functions in the given “band”
• Energy ratio for 4+ and 2+ states in
a given “band”
• Selection of hypothetical bands of rotational states based on the maximal correlation of the intrinsic SU(3) structures.
• Classical regular fraction in the
respective energy region
0 15 30 J
N = 30
0
2
intrinsic wave functions for various band members in the SU(3)
basis
),(
integrable regime
G C M J = 0, E = 0
Conclusions• Nuclear collective motions exhibit an intricate interplay or regular and
chaotic features (despite the presumption that collective = regular).• Models of collective motions may serve as a laboratory for general
studies of chaos (profit from the coexistence of simplicity and complexity).
• Order/Chaos have relevant nuclear-structure consequences (e.g. for the adiabatic separation of collective and intrinsic motions etc.).
Thanks to Pavel Stránský (now UNAM Mexico) Michal Macek (soon Uni Jerusalem)
15/15
Appendices
J=0, A=−0.84, B=C=K=1
Dependenceon energy
32 105.2/
1
09.1
1
K
C
B
A
GCM
GCM
32 105.2/
1
09.1
1
K
C
B
A
Peres latticesA visual method to study quantum chaos in 2D systems due to Asher Peres, PRL 53, 1711 (1984)
► In any system there exists infinite number of integrals of motions: e.g. time averages of an arbitrary quantity along individual orbits (note: in fully or partly chaotic systems, these integrals do not allow one to build action-angle variables since they are strongly nonanalytic)
0,)(lim0
H1
HPdttPPT
TT
(1934-2005)
► One can construct a lattice: energy versus value of
► Quantum counterparts of such observables can be found:
► In a fully regular (integrable) system, the lattice is always ordered (the new integral of motion is constant on tori => it is a function of actions)
► In a chaotic system, the lattice is disordered► In a mixed regular & chaotic system, the lattice is partly ordered & disordered
P
E
regular mixed chaotic
iiii PPP iE
Relation to the regular fraction GCM
4104
41025
410100
K/2classicality parameter
B=1.09 2D even