sustainability lorrae van kerkhoff fenner school of environment and society
TRANSCRIPT
Sustainability
Lorrae van Kerkhoff Fenner School of Environment and Society
2
What do you think engineerscan contribute tosustainability?
http://dilbert.com
3
Sustainable development
Development that meets the needs of the present, without compromising the
ability of future generations to meet their own needs.
WCED, 1987. Our Common Future. OUP.
4
Limits to resources
5
Sustainable development
Environment
EconomySociety
6
Sustainable development
Environment
Economy
Society
7
“The future we want”
Raw
orth
, K. 2
012.
A s
afe
and
Just
Spa
ce fo
r H
uman
ity. O
xfam
Dis
cuss
ion
Pap
er.
http
://w
ww
.oxf
am.o
rg/s
ites/
ww
w.o
xfam
.org
/file
s/dp
-a-s
afe-
and-
just
-spa
ce-f
or-h
uman
ity-1
3021
2-en
Roc
kstr
om, J
., W
. Ste
ffen,
et a
l. (2
009)
. "A
saf
e op
erat
ing
spac
e fo
r hu
man
ity."
Nat
ure 461(
7263
): 4
72-4
75.
8
“The currently observed changes to the Earth System are unprecedented in human history. Efforts to slow the rate or extent of change – including enhanced resource efficiency and mitigation measures – have resulted in moderate successes but have not succeeded in reversing adverse environmental changes. Neither the scope of these nor their speed has abated in the past five years.”
9
Technology and sustainability
Paul Ehrlich Julian Simon
“It cannot be overemphasized that no changes in behaviour or technology can save us unless we can achieve
control over the size of the human population.”
1969. The Population Bomb.
Are we now "in crisis" and "entering an age of scarcity"? …almost without exception, the relevant data - the long-run economic trends - suggest precisely the opposite… that natural resources have been becoming less scarce over the long run, right up to the present.1998. The Ultimate Resource II: people, materials and environment.
10
“Technology offers a continually, if unevenly, expanding domain of increasing human
control and power in the world, and in the process technology continually transforms
the natural and social worlds.”
Allenby and Sarewitz, 2011. The Techno-human Condition. Cambridge MA, MIT Press.
11
Which technology is currently contributing
MOST to sustainability?
12
http://blog.microsecommerce.com/index.php/uncategorized/eye-on-the-industry-the-next-wave-in-the-mobile-boom-are-you-ready/
13
Why the i-phone?
Level I: it’s a phone
Level II: it’s a new technology network
Level III: it’s transforming livelihoods for poor farmers
Allenby and Sarewitz, 2011. The Techno-human
Condition. Cambridge MA, MIT Press.
http://www.intomobile.com/2008/08/27/wireds-iphone-3g-data-speed-survey-shows-wireless-networks-as-weak-point/
http://www.hindustantimes.com/photos-news/photos-india/dailylifeindia/Article4-731375.aspx
14
Is it?
Really?
15
htt
p://
ww
w.a
gric
orn
er.c
om
/fa
rme
rs-b
ett
er-
off-
with
-use
-of-
mo
bile
-ph
one
s/
16
Level III technology: Earth system
“… a complex, constantly changing and adapting system in which human, built and natural elements all interact in ways that produce emergent behaviors which may be difficult to perceive, much less understand and manage.” (Allenby and Sarewitz, p.63)
17
Level III technology: Earth system
Co-evolutionary
Technological clusters
Transformative
Unpredictable
18
19
Sustainability
Technology is key
But has a wide range of unpredictable consequences
20
Sustainability – implications for technology
Flexibility, learning, nimbleness:- No ‘solutions’- Option spaces, scenarios: prepare for the
unexpected- Reduce technological lock-ins- Continual <aggressive> learning- Do not confuse economic efficiency with social
and ecological efficiency