sulfur detection at ppb levels in light permeable plot … · 2016. 9. 11. · 4 methyl mercaptan 3...
TRANSCRIPT
-
Sulfur Detection at ppb Levels in Light
Hydrocarbon Streams
Based on a New Super Permeable PLOTColumn
Agilent Select Low Sulfur
Johan KuipersChannel Training Specialist
Oct 12th, 2010
October 18, 20101
-
Sulfur compounds in refinery streams
Boiling point range of the feedstock determines presence type of sulfurs
•H2S•COS•Mercaptans•Thiophenes•Disulfides•Sulfides
Sulfur compounds even at < 100ppb level
•Poison Ziegler-Natta, Metallocene catalysts
•Drastically reduce the polymer yield of polyolefin feeds
-
Propylene, polypropylene
Sources of Propylene for polypropylene feed
• Refinery Fluidized Catalytic Cracking (FCC) byproduct• Ethylene Cracking Furnaces, byproduct of ethylene production• Propane catalytic dehydration
Refinery FCC byproduct is by far the largest source
-
Ethylene, Propylene Matrix
Low ppb level detection of H2S, COS, MercaptanesThe major challenges:
•Absorption of H2S and mercaptanes on active surfaces– Stability of calibration standards– Sample introduction path– Possible GC column absorption
•Sensitive sulfur specific detection required– Pulsed Flame Photometric Detector (PFPD)– Sulfur Chemiluminescence Detector (SCD)– Atomic Emission Detector (AED), limited sensitivity– Quenching due to co-eluting hydrocarbon species, matrix
-
What is needed of GC column for Sulfur Analysis?
October 18, 2010Confidentiality Label
5
Response
Selectivity Loadability
Low detection limitsLinearity of responseInert sample flow path
Low detection limitsMinimal detector quencing
Low detection limitsLarge injection volumes
-
Requirements GC Columns for Sulfurs
Which columns are available?
-
Excellent H2S response, poor selectivity
CP-Sil 5CB - 30m*0.32mm*5.0µm
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Ret. Time
Sign
al in
µV
1 100 ppb H2S 2 100 ppb COS
12
PDMS , 30m x 0.32mm x 5μm
Analysis 30°CDetection PFPD
Excellent H2S recovery
100 ppb H2S and COS, same response
Co-elution C3=Leads to detectorQuenching
-
Excellent selectivity, poor response
SilicaPLOT
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Ret. Time
Sig
nal
in µ
V
1
2
4
1 COS (± 100 ppb)2 H2S (± 100 ppb)3 Propane4 Methyl mercaptan
3
1. 100 ppb COS2. 100 ppb H2S3. Propane (matrix)4.Methylmercaptane
Analysis 100°CDetection PFPD
< 60% H2S recovery
Porous Silica 30m x 0.32mm
-
Current GC column materials for H2S/COS
Non-Polar Liquid Phase, PolyDimethylSiloxanes, Thick film 5μm•Highly inert column with excellent H2S responses•Not selective, COS/propylene co-elutes, detector quencing
Porous polymer PLOT columns•Absorption of H2S at low ppm levels•H2S/COS and propylene well separated
Porous Silica, PLOT columns•COS/ethylene,propylene well separated•H2S/ethylene, propylene well separated•Absorption of H2S at low ppb levels
All these columns either exhibit a poor selectivity or a poor H2S response
-
Agilent J&W Select for Low Sulfur
Agilent J&W Select for Low Sulfur•Near 100% recovery for H2S at ppb levels•Excellent sulfur selectivity for propylene matrices•Excellent prospects for ethylene matrices•PFPD, SCD, AED Compatible
•Porous Layer Open Tubelar (PLOT) column•Super Permeable & Porous Stationary Phase
– proprietary material•Zero particle loss•Dimension 60m x 0.32mm
-
Sulfur components approx 100 ppb
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
Time [min]
signa
l in µV
H2S
COS
MM
EM
iPM
PMColumn: Varian Select for Low Sulfur
60m x 0.32mmOven: 65°C (6.5) --> 185°C, Flow: 2.0 ml/min HeInj: 50ul @ atmospheric
split 1:50Det: PFPD
Ca. 100 ppb in N2
High response
Varian Select for Low Sulfur
-
Hydrocarbon elution profile on Select for Low Sulfur
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
Time [min]
sig
nal
[µ
V] C1
C2
C4'sC3
C3=
PD
MA
AC
C2=
Column: Varian Select for Low Sulfur60m x 0.32mm
Oven: 65°C (6.5) --> 185°C, Flow: 2.0 ml/min HeInj: 50ul @ atmospheric
split 1:50Det: PFPD
C1 – C4 Hydrocarbons selectivity
-
Sulfurs & HC’s on Select Low Sulfur
October 18, 2010Confidentiality Label
13
3 4 5 6 7 8Time [min]
Select Low Sulfur - 60m*0.32mmOverlay of H2S, COS and Methyl mercaptan with hydrocarbons
H2S C
OS P
ropy
lene
Met
hyl m
erca
ptan
met
hane
etha
ne
ethy
lene
Air
acet
ylen
e
prop
ane
Conditions:Column: Select Low Sulfur,
60m x 0.32mmTemperature: 65°C Carrier Gas: Helium, constant
flow 2 mL/minInjector: 200°CDetector: PFPD
Excellent separation COS/Propylene
-
Column Selectivity & Loadability
October 18, 2010Confidentiality Label
14
3 4 5 6 7 8Time [min]
H2S, COS and Methyl mercaptan in Propylene matrix
H2SCOS
Propylene Methyl mercaptan
Conditions:Column: Select Low Sulfur,
60m x 0.32mmTemperature: 65°C Carrier Gas: Helium, constant
flow 2 mL/minInjector: 200°CDetector: PFPDInj. Volume: 1 mL, split 1:20
Ca. 500 ppb
-
Low PPB Sulfur Levels
October 18, 201015
87.87.67.47.276.86.66.46.265.85.65.45.254.84.64.44.243.83.6
20
10
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
-60
-70
-80
-90
-100
-110
-120
-130
-140
-150
-160
Hydro
gen s
ulfid
e
Carb
onyl sulfid
e
Meth
yl m
erc
apta
n
RT [min]
Select Low Sulfur 5209025_20_2.DATAµV
Chromatogram of H2S with calculated ppb concentration of 21 ppb:
-
Linearity on Select Low Sulfur
October 18, 201016
R² = 0.9981
R² = 0.9977
R² = 0.9972
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
sqrt
of A
rea
coun
ts [µ
V.m
in-1
]
Concentration in ppb
Linearity on the Select Low Sulfur column of active sulfurs using GC-PFPD
H2S
COS
methyl mercaptan
Sample: gas mixture of H2S (11.4 ppm), COS (11.3 ppm) and MM (11.6 ppm) in N2.Sample loop: 1 ml, Variable split ratio’s (1:40 – 1:110)
-
Repeatabilty on SCD
October 18, 201017
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
0 10 20 30 40 50
Area
# of injections
H2S, COS and MM on Select Low Sulfur using SCD
H2S
COS
Methyl mercaptan
Conditions:Column: Select Low Sulfur, 60m x 0.32mmTemperature: 50°C for 8 minutes, with °C/min to 185°C for 10 minutes Carrier Gas: Helium, constant flow 2 mL/minInjector: 200°CDetector: SCD, base temperature 200°C, burner temperature 800°C, oxidizer 65 mL/min,
hydrogen 40 mL/minSample: 250ul, split 1:60, 11 ppm
Average area
st dev Area
% RSD
H2S 3426 65 1.9%COS 3631 65 1.8%MM 3146 50 1.6%
recovery 94%
60 pg on column
-
8.93 PPM S as COS
3.15 PPM S as H2SS/N 60
(Est. DL ~0.3 PPM)23.4% Propane
Propylene
TANK #2
8.93 PPM S as COS, 3.15 PPM S as H2S, 23.4% PROPANE, BALANCE PROPYLENE1-mL Gas Sample Loop, 50:1 Split Ratio, Inject Time 0.2 Minute Varian Beta Low Sulfur, 30-m X 0.32-mm ID, 1 mL/min He CarrierIsothermal Oven at 40 °COI PFPD Optimized For Sulfur Detection (Linear Mode)
Courtesy: Laura Chambers, OI Analytical
Sulfurs in Propane/propylene matrix
-
9.93 PPM S as COS
3.63 PPM S as H2SS/N 50
(Est. DL ~0.3 PPM)Propane
1% Propylene
TANK #3
20.7% Ethane
9.93 PPM S as COS, 3.63 PPM S as H2S, 20.7% ETHANE, 1% PROPYLENE, BALANCE PROPANE1-mL Gas Sample Loop, 50:1 Split Ratio, Inject Time 0.2 Minute Varian Beta Low Sulfur, 30-m X 0.32-mm ID, 1 mL/min He CarrierIsothermal Oven at 40 °COI PFPD Optimized For Sulfur Detection (Linear Mode)
Sulfurs in Ethane/Propane/Propylene matrix
Courtesy: Laura Chambers, OI Analytical
-
Conclusions
Agilent J&W Select for Low Sulfur
•Linear response H2S,COS and MM at 20 – 200 ppb level
•One dimension, 60m x 0.32mm
•Best accuracy and repeatability
•Low ppb H2S detection limits in propylene
•Mechanically stable PLOT column, zero particle loss
•Introduction December 2010, tentative
-
Acknowledgement
•Helena Jacobse, Agilent Technologies. The Netherlands
•Frans Biermans, Agilent Technologies. The Netherlands
•Laura Chambers, OI Analytical
Sulfur Detection at ppb Levels in Light Hydrocarbon StreamsSulfur compounds in refinery streamsPropylene, polypropyleneEthylene, Propylene MatrixWhat is needed of GC column for Sulfur Analysis?Requirements GC Columns for SulfursExcellent H2S response, poor selectivityExcellent selectivity, poor responseCurrent GC column materials for H2S/COSAgilent J&W Select for Low SulfurVarian Select for Low SulfurHydrocarbon elution profile on Select for Low SulfurSulfurs & HC’s on Select Low SulfurColumn Selectivity & LoadabilityLow PPB Sulfur LevelsLinearity on Select Low SulfurRepeatabilty on SCDSlide Number 18Slide Number 19ConclusionsAcknowledgement