sub-systems design review

38
Sub-Systems Design Review P14416 Concrete Arborloo Base October 29, 2013

Upload: addo

Post on 23-Feb-2016

43 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Sub-Systems Design Review. P14416 Concrete Arborloo Base October 29, 2013. Team Intro. Agenda. Background Functional Decomposition/Architecture Updated Customer Requirements Subsystems Geometry Composition Compression Test Results Features Cost/Trade-off Analysis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Sub-Systems Design Review

Sub-Systems Design ReviewP14416

Concrete Arborloo Base

October 29, 2013

Page 2: Sub-Systems Design Review

Team Intro

Member RoleVictoria Snell (ISE) Project ManagerEvan Burley (ME) EngineerJoe Omilanowicz (ME) EngineerMac Keehfus (ME) EngineerAnthony Deleo (ISE) Engineer

Page 3: Sub-Systems Design Review

Agenda• Background• Functional Decomposition/Architecture• Updated Customer Requirements• Subsystems

– Geometry– Composition

• Compression Test Results– Features

• Cost/Trade-off Analysis• Engineering Requirements• Project Management Updates

Page 4: Sub-Systems Design Review

• A latrine-like sanitation device designed to function over a small pit and to be moved to a new pit when filled

• Utilize compost by planting tree in used pit• Purpose to provide affordable sanitation in poor,

underdeveloped areas– Originally designed for use in Zimbabwe (Peter Morgan)

Arborloo

Page 5: Sub-Systems Design Review

Functional Decomposition

Page 6: Sub-Systems Design Review

Functional Architecture

Page 7: Sub-Systems Design Review

Meeting with Francius Estimable (Johnny)

• Weight

• Price: ~25 USD = 1100 HTG

• Type of Cement is still unknown

• Prefers a DIY kit to educate locals

• Design should be simple

Page 8: Sub-Systems Design Review

Updated Customer Requirements

2) Weight

• 25 dollars• Make it available to

all Haitians coming from different economic states

• Make it transportable through all environments

• Can be moved by 1-2 people comfortably

• Easy to make• Simple mold• Limited materials/

ingredients

1) Cost 2) Simpler the better

Page 9: Sub-Systems Design Review

Meeting with Manitou• Self consolidating Concrete

– Self Leveling – Higher Slump– No Vibration– Chemical Needed (Water Reducer)

• More Efficient Mix Ratio– More Aggregate – Less Cement

• Specific Gravities• Finishing Tools• Use of Fibers

Page 10: Sub-Systems Design Review

Geometry

• Shape• Thickness• Feasibility of

Molds

Page 11: Sub-Systems Design Review

Theoretical Analysis• Maximum allowable

flexural and compressive strength for each mold design:

• Assume square slab• To make up for the

lack of stress concentrations due to the hole: Factor of Safety of 3

Θ

b: width into the board σcomp=σflex=

Page 12: Sub-Systems Design Review

Theoretical Graph

0 50 1000

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

Theta (Degrees)

Stre

ngth

(psi

)Flexural Strength vs Theta

Shear Stress

0 50 1000

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Theta (Degrees)

Stre

ss (p

si)

Compressive Stress vs Theta

Compressive Stress

Page 13: Sub-Systems Design Review

Feasibility of Molds

• Wood– Plastic sheets

(release agent)– Reusable– Not as precise

• Metal• Plastic• Plastic injection methods• Foam

– Expensive (concrete canoe~$800)

– Very accurate– Trying to figure out

the release agent

Page 14: Sub-Systems Design Review

Composition

• Aggregates• Bind properly• Provide strength• Reduce cost

• Cement Replacements

Page 15: Sub-Systems Design Review

Mixtures• 6 different mixtures (each contained cement, course aggregates, fine

aggregates, and water)• Cement (ternary mix)

– Portland, slag, fly ash (improves strength, workability, and requires less water)

• Aggregates (all mixtures contained sand)– Course

• Coconut shells• Rubber• Limestone

– Fine• Sand• Plastic Beads• Styrofoam

Page 16: Sub-Systems Design Review

Why?• Slag and fly ash improve strength of concrete when

combined with Portland• Aggregates can be found in Haiti

• Coconut shells– considered trash/ in abundance

• Rubber– Need to figure out a way to grind up tires

• Limestone/Sand– In abundance in Haiti

• Plastic Beads/Styrofoam– Could grind up plastic water bottles

Page 17: Sub-Systems Design Review

Units (lbs) Mix 1 Mix 2 Mix 3 Mix 4 Mix 5 Mix 6 Mix 7 Mix 8 Mix 9

Cement 12.49 12.49 12.49 12.49 12.49 12.49 2.35 4.83 2.96

Slag 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 0.83 X 1.05

Flyash 4.82 4.82 4.82 4.82 4.82 4.82 0.65 X 0.82

Sand 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 6.95 8.87 8.87

Rubber 1.20 X X 1.20 X X 2.21 X X

Styrofoam 0.01 0.01 X X 0.01 X 0.04 X X

Plastic X X 0.68 0.68 X 0.68 X X X

Coconut X 1.20 1.20 X X X X 4.14 4.14

Limestone X X X X 1.77 1.77 X X X

Water 7.75 7.75 8.26 7.5 8 8.26 1.72 2.18 2.18

Glenium X X X X X X 10mL 8mL 8mL

Weight/cyl 4.53* 7.16* 7.32*

*weight measured before curing

Page 18: Sub-Systems Design Review

Cylinder Testing Procedure

• Slump test: General idea on mold capability as well as the proper amount of water

• After 7 days/28 days of curing– ASTM C39: radius= 4” height= 8” Cylinder is loaded

axially. Determines maximum compressive strength (psi)

Page 19: Sub-Systems Design Review

Cylinder Plan• 70% Strength at 7 days• 28 day Accepted

Standard• Fibers add mild

Compression Strength• Limestone/Rubber/

Coconut/Shells/Sand/Stryofoam/Plastic

Page 20: Sub-Systems Design Review

Big Picture Results• Quality:

– Availability: aggregates (coconuts and sand)

– Mixture mass is heavily driven by cement and sand volumes

– Glenium (HRWR): reduces the amount of water

• Quantity:– Price– Compressive Performance– Weight

Page 21: Sub-Systems Design Review

Results from 7 Day Cylinders

Trial 1 2 3 4 5 61 (7 days) 22.64 37.67 34.67 21.35 47.07 58.58

2 (28)3

Trial 1 2 3 4 5 61 (7 days) 1801.634 2997.683 2758.95 1698.98 3745.71 4661.65

2 (28) 0 0 0 0 0 03 0 0 0 0 0 0

Trial 1 2 3 4 5 61 (7 days) 270.24509 449.6525 413.843 254.847 561.857 699.247

2 (28) 0 0 0 0 0 03 0 0 0 0 0 0

Max Compressive Force For Mix (Kips)

Max Compressive Strength (psi)

Recorded

Mix Tensile Strength (psi, assume 15% compression)

Area of Test cylinder= 12.56637A= π*r2 σ=F[lbf]/A[in2]

Page 22: Sub-Systems Design Review

Mix performance

104

106

108

110

112

114

116

118

120

122

124

Mixture lb/ft^3

Mix 1 Mix 2 Mix 3 Mix 4 Mix 5 Mix 6

lb/ft

^3

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

5000Mixture Compressive Strength

Mix 1 Mix 2 Mix 3 Mix 4 Mix 5 Mix 6

Com

pres

sive

Stre

ss (p

si)

Page 23: Sub-Systems Design Review

Improvements Moving Forward• Add more aggregate

– Used too much cement in first round of testing– Will reduce weight

• Make more viscous (less water)– Styrofoam floated to the top of cylinders– Use Glenium

• Use of finer aggregates– Sand is more dense than concrete– Higher strength with less voids

Page 24: Sub-Systems Design Review

Features• Modular upgrades for additional cost• Prepare basic design to allow for add-ins

• Handles• Textures• Shelter connection points

Page 25: Sub-Systems Design Review

Transportability

• Handles• Wheels• Rope Attachments

• Terrain is too rough for wheels• Anchor bolts require $ and drill

• Mold holes in sides for handles/hooks– Can this be done?

• Multi-functional attributes simplicity

$5.98

$2.80

$0.48

All require holes and

screws

$4.12

Page 26: Sub-Systems Design Review

Shelter Interface• Holes?

– Consistent with transportability features– Pole connection

• Grooves?– Sheet metal

connection• Small size?

• Also reduces material and weight

• Depends on ground hole

Page 27: Sub-Systems Design Review

Odor/Pest Reduction• Cheap, simple cover• What can be reused?• Simple hinge?

• Additional holes for toilet seat cover?

• Recommendation for household materials to use– Five gallon bucket

Page 28: Sub-Systems Design Review

How to make it visually appealing and simple at the same time:

Page 29: Sub-Systems Design Review

Material CostsMaterials Cost Weight (lb) Cost/lb

Rubber Mulch 10.98$ 19.8 0.55$ Coconut* -$ - -$ Limestone 10.00$ 2000 0.01$ Sand* -$ - -$ Styrofoam 14.99$ 2 7.50$ Plastic 7.99$ 2 4.00$ Cement* 6.28$ 94 0.07$ Slag 90.00$ 2000 0.05$ Fly Ash 70.00$ 2000 0.04$

*Reflects Cost in Haiti

Page 30: Sub-Systems Design Review

Fly Ash/Slag?• Need to evaluate cost/strength trade-off

– Fly ash and slag are not produced in Haiti– Shipping costs are unknown

Page 31: Sub-Systems Design Review

Cost Breakdown

Weight Cost/lb Weight Cost Weight Cost Weight Cost Weight Cost1 Cylinder 4.2 0.28$ 1.6 0.06$ 2.0 0.09$ 0.2 0.11$ 0.2 -$ Arborloo 117.0 7.82$ 45.3 1.58$ 54.8 2.47$ 5.6 3.12$ 5.6 -$

Weight Cost Weight Cost Weight Cost Weight Cost1 Cylinder 0.6 0.00$ 0.5 -$ 0.003 0.02$ 0.2 0.92$ Arborloo 16.6 0.08$ 14.1 -$ 0.079 0.59$ 6.5 25.84$

Sand StyrofoamLimestone

Cement Fly Ash Slag Rubber Coconut Shells

Plastic Pellets

Page 32: Sub-Systems Design Review

Summary of Results

ScoreMixtures Coarse Ag Fine Ag Total Cost Weight Compressive Tensile* Total Cost Weight Strength TotalMix 1 Rubber Styrofoam 15.58$ 181.41 1801.63 360.33 4 6 2 12Mix 2 Coconut Styrofoam 12.46$ 190.41 2997.68 599.54 6 4 4 14Mix 3 Coconut Plastic 37.71$ 188.44 2758.95 551.79 3 5 3 11Mix 4 Rubber Plastic 40.83$ 189.28 1698.98 339.80 1 3 1 5Mix 5 Limestone Styrofoam 12.54$ 193.50 3745.71 749.14 5 2 5 12Mix 6 Limestone Plastic 37.80$ 199.13 4661.65 932.33 2 1 6 9

Cylinder Strength (psi) Ranking

* Assume 20% of compression strength

PM Arborloo

Page 33: Sub-Systems Design Review

Engineering Requirements– Purchase Cost

• Plastic expensive• <15$

– Load it can support• Compression Results• Only 70% strength

– Ground Hole size Over design– Weight

• Average weight per/cylinder = • Per/arborloo=

Page 34: Sub-Systems Design Review

Project Schedule: Past/Current

Page 35: Sub-Systems Design Review

Project Schedule: Future

Page 36: Sub-Systems Design Review

Budget TrackerItem Store Price

94 lb Portland Cement Home Depot $10.47

40" PVC Fencing Home Depot $9.97

48"x.25" Round Steel Rod Home Depot $9.26

Bird Netting Home Depot $14.47

.8 cu ft Rubber Mulch Home Depot $5.97

Plastic Sheeting Home Depot $10.98

Hardware Cloth Home Depot $9.22

Chicken Wire Home Depot $7.97

Bean Bag Filler Bed Bath and Beyond $14.99Cement Mixer Lowes $8.54Platic Beads Jo-Ann Fabrics $14.992 gallon Bags Target $8.18

Styrofoam Michael's $8.99

Total: $134.00

Page 37: Sub-Systems Design Review

Updated Risk Assessment

Page 38: Sub-Systems Design Review

Moving Forward• Refining concrete mixtures

– Aggregates for low cost compressive strength• Flexural testing

– Mold for test block– Finalize reinforcements

• Cost estimates– Availability in Haiti– Shipping costs

• Finalizing features– Continue to assess feasibility