structure and policy - university of utahcontent.csbs.utah.edu/~fan/fcs5400-6400... · 11/16/2009 2...
TRANSCRIPT
11/16/2009
1
Tax Tax
Structure Structure
and Policyand Policy
Mandeep Gill and Heather TraedenMandeep Gill and Heather Traeden
Mandeep GillMandeep Gill
Tax Policy and Structure
Taxation DefinedTaxation Defined
� Taxation-
� charge against a citizens person, property or activity for the support of government
� Taxes can be levied by:
� Federal government
� State Government
� Local Government (municipal, township, district, and county)
� Regional organizations like school, utility, and transit districts
History of Tax in the U.S.History of Tax in the U.S.
� Colonial Taxation
• Sugar Act 1764-
• revenue raising act enacted by Britain to keep English products cheaper then competitors by
placing a 6 cent tax on molasses
• Stamp Act 1765-
• enacted by British Government in order to maintain the military by placing a stamp tax on newspapers,
wills, pamphlets, and playing cards
History of Tax in the U.S. (cont)History of Tax in the U.S. (cont)
� Colonial Taxation
• Townsend Revenue Act 1767-
• proposed by Charles Townsend of Exchequer
• placed tax on common colonial goods like lead,
paper, paint, glass, and tea
• also lead to creation of courts to enforce payment
• Property tax and additional sales tax were charged in
various jurisdiction and to various individuals, especially farmers and owners of large parcels
History of Tax in the U.S. (cont)History of Tax in the U.S. (cont)
� Colonial Taxation
• Boston Tea Party 1773-
• lead to the eventual American Revolution
• protest by American Colonials in protest of Britain's
tax policy
• crates of tea thrown into the Atlantic Ocean in
defiance of Britain's tax policy
11/16/2009
2
History of Tax in the U.S. (cont)History of Tax in the U.S. (cont)
• Post Revolution Taxation
• Tariffs-
• a duty placed on goods when they move between countries
• tariffs were the largest source of income for the U.S. government from the late 1700’s until the beginning of World War I
• Limited property and sales tax enacted by various federal administrations and local entities also generated revenue for federal, state, and local governments
• very limited
History of Tax in the U.S. (cont)History of Tax in the U.S. (cont)
� Income Tax
• The Historical roots of income tax are traced to the Civil War
• In 1861 and 1862 congress passed two separate revenue acts to help with war efforts
• Tax levy for income above $600 was 3%
• Tax Levy for income above $10,000 was 5%
• Property Tax was repealed in 1872 and then resurfaced in
1894
History of Tax in the U.S. (Cont)History of Tax in the U.S. (Cont)
� 16th Amendment passed in 1913
• “The Congress shall have the power to lay and collect
taxes on income, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among several states and
without regard to the census or enumeration”
• Until the ratification of this amendment the
constitutionality of levying income tax was in question
History of Tax in the U.S. (Cont)History of Tax in the U.S. (Cont)
� Today's tax structure and government revenue
generation includes:
• Sales Tax
• Property Tax
• Income Tax
• Tariffs
• Excise Tax
• Fees, Licenses, and Intergovernmental charges
History of Tax in the U.S. (Cont)History of Tax in the U.S. (Cont)
• What gives Government the ability to generate revenue through taxation?
• The Constitution
• Constitutional and Congressional rules on delegation
• State Constitutions
• Truth in Taxation
• Tax Court
• Utah not a “home rule” state-
• Utah cities may not create new taxes without legislative authority
Primary Types of TaxPrimary Types of Tax
1. Sales Tax (regressive)
2. Property Tax (progressive)
3. Income Tax (progressive and regressive)
4. Permits, Licensures, and Fees (regressive)
5. Other taxes:
� estate tax
� payroll tax
� excise tax
� franchise tax
11/16/2009
3
Sales Tax Sales Tax
� A tax on the purchase of goods, usually:
• Every retail service made in a state
• All Services rendered or commodities furnished by any utility
• The amount paid for meals regularly furnished to the public
• The amount paid for admission to any amusement, entertainment, or recreation event
Sales Tax (cont)Sales Tax (cont)
� Responsible for 20% of the State of Utah’s revenue
for Fiscal Year 2008
� Responsible for 27% of Utah cities and towns revenue
� Easy to collect
� Considered equal in the sense that everyone pays the same regardless of income
Sales Tax (cont)Sales Tax (cont)
• Merits and drawbacks of relying on sales tax revenues
• Highly dependent an economic conditions
• One of the most publicly approved tax
• High approval because of incremental payment
• Easy to collect
• Can be too mobile
Property TaxProperty Tax
� Property tax is paid on two types of property:
1. Real Property-
� real estate and improvements to real estate
2. Tangible Personal Property-
� office equipment, furniture, and vehicles
Property Tax (cont)Property Tax (cont)
• Property Tax is responsible for 20% of the revenue
generated by Utah Cities and Towns
• Most property tax in Utah is distributed to school districts, as public education represents 31% of the
states expenditure, by far the largest expenditure
• For most of the early twentieth century property tax was the primary revenue source for both state
and local government
Property Tax (cont)Property Tax (cont)
� Merits and drawbacks of property tax
• Stable and reliable source of revenue
• Lacks the high growth upside of sales tax or income tax
• Forgoes most risks of economic decline
• Property tax largely immobile
• Politically visible
• Often paid in a lump some once a year
11/16/2009
4
Income TaxIncome Tax
• A personal tax levied on most income incurred,
statutorily defined as:
• “…gains, profits, and income derived from salaries, wages, or compensation for personal services…of
whatever form paid, or from professions, vocations, trades, businesses, commerce, or sales, or dealings in
property, whether real or personal, growing out of the ownership or use of or interest in such property; also
from interest, rent, dividends, securities, or the transaction of any business carried on for gain or
profit, or gains or profit and income derived from any source whatever”
Income Tax (cont)Income Tax (cont)
• Income tax revenue for the U.S. varies among reports
• The Congressional Budget Office estimates it at 50%
• Income tax is polarizing and often a main concern of
the public and subject of debate among economists
and policymakers
• “Conservative” ideology vs. “Liberal” ideology
• Trickle Down Correction vs. Service Oriented
Correction
• Capitalistic redistribution vs. Socialistic redistribution
Income Tax (cont)Income Tax (cont)
• Merits and drawbacks of income tax
• Can be difficult to collect
• Can decrease savings rate
• Depending on ideology it is considered equal or unequal
• Dictated by the economy
• Can be mobile
• Most controversial tax
• Is a significant source of revenue
Permits, Licensures, and FeesPermits, Licensures, and Fees
� Charges, fees, or levies on governmental services,
permits, and licensures
� These include :� deer hunting permits
� driver license fees� building permits
� business licensure, etc.
Permits, Licensures, and Fees (cont)Permits, Licensures, and Fees (cont)
� Accounts for 15% of State of Utah’s revenue
� Accounts for 5% of Utah’s cities and towns revenue
� Generally, in order to set amount of fees, policy makers must conduct a study to determine the
average individualized cost of the infrastructure,
service, or commodity for which the fee is being charged
Permits, Licensures, and Fees (cont)Permits, Licensures, and Fees (cont)
� Merits and drawbacks to permits, licensures, and
fees
• Appropriate pricing structure hard to determine
• Is considered equal and unequal depending on
ideology
• Can often directly offset costs for various services if
priced appropriately
11/16/2009
5
Summary Data on the U.S. Tax System Summary Data on the U.S. Tax System
Source (1999) Amount (millions $) Percent of all Taxes
Federal Taxes
Income Taxes 879,500 34.5%
Social Insurance Taxes 611,800 24.0%
Corporate Taxes 184,700 7.2%
Excise Taxes 70,400 2.8%
Estate Taxes 22,900 0.9%
Total Federal Taxes 1,769,300 69.4%
State Taxes
PropertyTaxes 240,100 9.4%
Sales Taxes 200,600 7.9%
Income Taxes 189,300 7.4%
Excise and other Taxes 114,500 4.5%
Corporate Taxes 33,900 1.3%
Total State Taxes 778,400 30.6%
Total, All Taxes 2,547,700 100.0%
Tax Defined as…Tax Defined as…
1. Progressive
• Income Tax
• Property Tax
2. Regressive
• Sales Tax
• Income Tax (tax code cutoffs and limits)
• Permits, Licensures, and Fees
Tax Progressivity and RegressivityTax Progressivity and Regressivity
� Progressive Tax
• A tax rate that increases as a persons discretionary
income or ability to pay increases
• Income Tax highly progressive in structure as they
have a graduated rate based on personal income
Tax Progressivity and RegressivityTax Progressivity and Regressivity
� Arguments for Progressive tax
• Improve equality of tax structure
• Has a natural stabilizer –
• if your income decreases so does your tax burden
Tax Progressivity and RegressivityTax Progressivity and Regressivity
� Arguments against Progressive tax
• Progressivity can decrease savings rates
• Disincentive to work or progress upward
• Can lead to tax evasion
• Increases tax burden on the wealthy
Tax Progressivity and RegressivityTax Progressivity and Regressivity
� Regressive Tax
• Taxes that take a larger percentage from low income
citizens compared to high income citizens
• Example: Gas tax is applied at the same rate
regardless of how much an individual personally earns
• Sales tax considered regressive, tax rates the same regardless of income
11/16/2009
6
Tax Progressivity and RegressivityTax Progressivity and Regressivity
� Argument for regressive tax
• Easy to collect and hard to evade
• Can assist government in influencing consumer behavior
• Equity in the fact that everyone pays the same
Tax Progressivity and RegressivityTax Progressivity and Regressivity
� Arguments against regressive tax
• Places a greater tax burden on lower income
consumers
• Impinges on freedom through government coercion
Tax Progressivity and RegressivityTax Progressivity and Regressivity
• Progressivity and Regressivity act as apparatuses to
determine tax equity and even distribution of the tax burden
• Who decides what taxes are fair?
• Not frequently debated by local officials
• Most concerns of tax equity are the responsibilities of the federal and state governments
• Local governments have little authority of wealth redistribution
What Do You Think?What Do You Think?
� Where should the tax burden be placed?
� Should we rely on regressive type taxes?
� Should we rely on progressive taxes?
� What are their merits and drawbacks?
Composition of the Tax BaseComposition of the Tax Base
� When considering tax there are two primary
questions to consider as a policymaker…
1. What tax do you want to rely on to create reliable revenue?
� property, sales, income, etc
2. Does my Constituency favor progressive or
regressive tax
3. What is considered equal and fair?
Composition of the Tax BaseComposition of the Tax Base
� Tax Structure and policy must be balanced in order
to keep revenues consistent for service delivery and fair to constituents
� Most important considerations of tax policy and
structure…
1. Efficiency
2. Equality and fairness
11/16/2009
7
Intended Purpose of Tax PolicyIntended Purpose of Tax Policy
� To provide revenue for services and governmental
functions
� To deter certain behavior and encourage certain behavior
� I.E Earned income tax credit
� I.E cigarette tax
� To build strong economic infrastructure through
the redistribution of wealth
Economic Concepts Related To Tax Economic Concepts Related To Tax
PolicyPolicy
• Tax Policy can act as a corrective measure to mitigate poor economic conditions
• Specific economic concepts include:• Capitalism
• Socialism
• Wealth
• Regressive vs. progressive structures
• expenditure vs. revenue
• Stimulus
• Fee structure
• Cost Benefit Analysis
• Equity and implications of higher and lower costs for
various constituencies
Does Tax Policy and Structure Provide Does Tax Policy and Structure Provide
Revenue for all Levels of Government?Revenue for all Levels of Government?
Absolutely
Does Tax Policy and Tax Structure Deter Does Tax Policy and Tax Structure Deter
or Influence Behavior?or Influence Behavior?
� Excise tax on tobacco has reduced cigarette
smokers, however, this has coincided with health and scientific advancement
� High fees on participation in certain trades and
industries has helped influence consumer behavior
in the direction that favors governments desire
� Tax Cab Licensure
� river rafting permits, etc
Has Tax Policy Achieved it’s Purpose in Has Tax Policy Achieved it’s Purpose in
Building a Strong Economic InfrastructureBuilding a Strong Economic Infrastructure
• Trickle Down Economics-• slashing taxes across the board
• credited with saving the economy in the aftermath of the Carter administration during the Reagan Administration
• Triangulation-
• a strict mix of cuts and increases
• credited with balanced budgets and record economic growth in
the Clinton Administration
• Complete tax cuts with increased spending (two war fronts, Homeland security)-
• credited with record deficits and compromised economic infrastructure in the most recent Bush administration
• The answer, depends on who you ask
Does Tax Policy Achieve it’s Intended Does Tax Policy Achieve it’s Intended
Purpose? Purpose?
� Tax policy and structure has and has not achieved
it’s various purposes throughout history
� As with all policy balance is fundamental to effective policy
� What do you think?
� What philosophies do you subscribe to?
11/16/2009
8
Side Affects of Tax Policy and StructureSide Affects of Tax Policy and Structure
� Over correction
� Under correction
� Too coercive and impedes constitutional rights
� Political consequences cause apprehension when tough choices need to be made
� Inequity
� Can have negative impact on the economy
� Can inadvertently effect certain industries (Excise Tax on cigarettes effects paper makers)
Interest Group Conflicts Interest Group Conflicts
• Tax Policy effects everyone but it effects groups in very
different ways. Think about how it may effect these groups
• The Elderly
• The Wealthy
• The Poor
• Minorities
• Corporate America
• Home Builders
• Home Owners
• Renters (higher rent cause of landlord property tax)
• Disabled
• People may belong to more than one group and that changes the dynamic
How Do We Evaluate Tax Structure and How Do We Evaluate Tax Structure and
Policy?Policy?
• Measurements of various economic indicators
• GDP
• Municipal financial reports
• Special district financial reports
• Federal and State Government financial reports
• Trade deficits
• Interest rates
• Historical reference
• Public Opinion
• Global economic evaluation
• Tax structure of industrialized nations
How Do We Evaluate Tax Structure and How Do We Evaluate Tax Structure and
Policy?Policy?
• Analysts utilize 5 elements of evaluation
• Condition
• layer evidence
• what is happening
• Criteria
• what should be happening
• Effect
• what is the impact
• Cause
• why did it happen
• Recommendation
• what should be done
Summary AssessmentSummary Assessment
� Tax Policy is often based on ideology, however,
most non-partisan analysts agree that balance is a key when considering who and how to tax
� What do the experts Say?...
Heather TraedenHeather Traeden
The Expert Opinion From
Prevailing Ideologies and
Perspectives
11/16/2009
9
Conservatives and Critics of TaxationConservatives and Critics of Taxation
� Support anti-tax platforms and tax cuts
� Argue that taxes hurt economic growth
� Argue that Americans are over taxed
� Support “Tax Relief”
� Support cutting government programs to provide
tax cuts
Conservatives and Critics (cont)Conservatives and Critics (cont)
� Tax cuts boost worker productivity
� Tax cuts increase investments
� Tax cuts put money in your pocket
The Critics of TaxationThe Critics of Taxation
� Taxation is income redistribution
� Uses tax payers money to support the poor
� Uses tax payers money for foreign aid
� Government seen as “them” and Americans seen as
“us”
� Representative Dick Armey has argued,
� Education and health care are difficult to afford because the government itself makes us poor through high taxes
The Critics of Taxation (cont)The Critics of Taxation (cont)
� Publicly people support taxation and often agree to
increases – if they can get a slice of the redistribution pie
� Privately people try to avoid it whenever they can
� Forces you to compromise your moral principles
� Modus operandi of totalitarian oppression
The Critics of Taxation (cont)The Critics of Taxation (cont)
� David Keating – National Taxpayers Union (1990)
� “If we don’t seize on this revolutionary moment to rein
in taxes and rein in entitlements, we could be looking at a government headed for financial oblivion…and a
populace that is so over-taxed and so desperate that we could be talking about real revolutions”
The Critics of Taxation (cont)The Critics of Taxation (cont)
� Requires individual action to say, “No”
� You can find ways to “opt out”, disengage, and
remove your sanction
� http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvvdKzi_Bhg&f
eature=pyv&ad=2827565066&kw=tax&gclid=CMmt
18Hzi54CFQ4MDQoduVsaqQ
� Georgia Tea Party Rally, April 2009
11/16/2009
10
Liberals and ProponentsLiberals and Proponents
� Support paying taxes
� Support progressive Taxes
� Tax the rich
� Reduce taxes on the poor
� Use taxes to provide valuable government programs
Proponents for TaxationProponents for Taxation
� Taxes are good
� Support government programs that work to solve societal problems
� Support justice and economic security
� Work to promote the public good
� Taxes provide programs that improve our lives
� Public roads
� Clean water
� Safe food standards
Proponents for Taxation (cont)Proponents for Taxation (cont)
� Taxes are our dues – we pay our dues to be
Americans and enjoy the benefits of American society. Taxes are what we pay to live in a civilized
society that is democratic, offers opportunity, and
has a huge infrastructure available to all citizens. This incredible infrastructure has been paid for by
previous taxpayers. Roads and highways, the
Internet, the broadcast airwaves, our public education system, our power grid – every day we all
use this vast infrastructure. Our dues maintain it.
George Lakoff
Proponents for Taxation (cont)Proponents for Taxation (cont)
Country Tax as % of GDP (2006)
SWEDEN/DENMARK 49.1
FRANCE 44.2
ITALY 42.1
AUSTRIA 41.7
UNITED KINGDOM 37.1
SPAIN 36.6
GERMANY 35.6
CANADA 33.3
SWITZERLAND 29.6
UNITED STATES 28.0
Proponents for Taxation (cont)Proponents for Taxation (cont)
� The previous slide shows the levels of taxation in
other Western Countries
� Americans carry much less of a tax burden than the citizens in almost every comparable Western
European Country
Proponents for Taxation (cont)Proponents for Taxation (cont)
1970 1980 1990 2007
State & Local Gov Receipts 9.3 8.8 9.7 10.4
Federal Gov Receipts 19.0 19.0 18.0 18.8
Total Gov Receipts 28.3 27.8 27.7 29.2
11/16/2009
11
Proponents for Taxation (cont)Proponents for Taxation (cont)
� Government take over the last 40 years has
changed very little
� From 28.3 % to 29.2%
� Austria increased from 37.4% to 43%
� Italy increased from 26.1% to 43.4%
Proponents for Taxation (cont)Proponents for Taxation (cont)
� Spending on foreign aid and welfare amounts to
less than 3% of the federal budget
� Government spends three times the amount on programs like Social Security and Medicare then it
does on Medicaid, welfare and food stamps
� In 1999, the government spent $72 billion on housing subsidies for the middle and upper class
and only $24 billion for low income housing and
rent subsidies
Proponents for Taxation (cont)Proponents for Taxation (cont)
� Other important services provided by taxes
� Police protection
� Fire protection
� Sewage treatment
� Public education
� Parks
� Public libraries
� Road maintenance, etc….
Proponents for Taxation (cont)Proponents for Taxation (cont)
� Taxation is associated
with higher worker productivity. Not in
and of itself, but productivity depends
on a large number of factors.
Top Ave.
Income Tax Rate
Ave. Annual
Productivity Growth
Rate
1950-1963 91.1% 3.5%
1964-1980 71.2% 2.2%
1981-1986 53.2% 2.1%
1987-1992 30.8% 1.7%
1993-2002 39.5% 2.1%
Proponents for Taxation (cont)Proponents for Taxation (cont)
� Government is “us” and spending is generally
supposed to reflect “our” collective will
� The money doesn’t belong to the government, it belongs to us. But the government belongs to us
too. It does not steal from us, we pool resources so
we can act on behalf of the commonweal – the weal (well-being) common to us. …Taxes are not tithes
imposed by tyrants, they are self imposed duties
that permit the our government to discharge our common purposes. (Benjamin Barber, 1996)
� Americans who believe taxes are too high is now at
its lowest level since the 1960’s
Are There Problems With Taxation in Are There Problems With Taxation in
America?America?
� Of course
� What bothers most people about taxes
� Some in America are not paying their fair share
� Wealthy too little
� Middle class and poor pay too much
11/16/2009
12
What are the Real Issues and Debates?What are the Real Issues and Debates?
� How fair are taxes?
� How much of the tax burden should be shouldered
by various economic classes?
� Are there better and worse ways to collect taxes?
� Should we rely more on regressive taxes and less on
progressive taxes?
� Should we continue the substantial tax breaks to the middle and upper classes?
We Will SurviveWe Will Survive
� http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eim5jLlEPYI