strategic planningstrategic planning consolidated planning & monitoringconsolidated planning...

33
Strategic Planning Consolidated Planning & Monitoring August 2014

Upload: merry-doyle

Post on 25-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Strategic PlanningStrategic Planning Consolidated Planning & MonitoringConsolidated Planning & Monitoring August 2014August 2014

Strategic Planning

Consolidated Planning & MonitoringAugust 2014

Page 2: Strategic PlanningStrategic Planning Consolidated Planning & MonitoringConsolidated Planning & Monitoring August 2014August 2014

2

Planning

District and School-Level Plans

Page 3: Strategic PlanningStrategic Planning Consolidated Planning & MonitoringConsolidated Planning & Monitoring August 2014August 2014

3

What is strategic planning?

Simply put:

A systematic approach through which an organization agrees on priorities that are essential to its mission and responsive to its environment and needs. • Driven by data • Guides resource allocation• Builds commitment

Page 4: Strategic PlanningStrategic Planning Consolidated Planning & MonitoringConsolidated Planning & Monitoring August 2014August 2014

4

Dates of Interest:District and School-Level Plans

August 1, 2014: LEAs begin planning process with release of district-level accountability data

August 18, 2014: Schools begin planning process with release of school-level accountability data

September 1 – 30, 2014: LEAs must update ePlan with 2014-15 school year district plans (no later than 30th)

October 1 – October 31, 2014: Schools must finalize plans and may enter 2014-15 school year plans in ePlan

December 1, 2014: LEAs will have reviewed all school plans and submitted documented approval of school plans to TDOE

Page 5: Strategic PlanningStrategic Planning Consolidated Planning & MonitoringConsolidated Planning & Monitoring August 2014August 2014

5

School-Level Plans

Spring 2014: Pilot included school-level plan entry in ePlan was conducted for select LEAs and Schools• Identification of additional components needed• Working groups to refine ePlan template to avoid duplications

School Year 2014-15: Title I School plans are an annual requirement• Aligned with district plan• LEA reviewed and approved• Progress monitored (on-going)

September 2014: Webinar specific to school plans• Requirements• How to navigate ePlan• Understanding district-level and school-level plan alignment

Page 6: Strategic PlanningStrategic Planning Consolidated Planning & MonitoringConsolidated Planning & Monitoring August 2014August 2014

6

ePlan

Page 7: Strategic PlanningStrategic Planning Consolidated Planning & MonitoringConsolidated Planning & Monitoring August 2014August 2014

7

What is ePlan?

Tennessee’s online planning and grants management system for LEAs:

Submit and revise district and school-level plans

Apply for federal funding to support plans

Request reimbursements and report expenditures

Process budget amendments and program revisions when needed

Produce summative reports for oversight and review

Page 8: Strategic PlanningStrategic Planning Consolidated Planning & MonitoringConsolidated Planning & Monitoring August 2014August 2014

8

Primary ePlan Components

Planning • Approved by CORE

(Centers of Regional Excellence)

Consolidated Funding Application• Approved by CPM and Other Program Offices

(Office of Consolidated Planning & Monitoring)

Reimbursement Requests• Approved by CFO

(Office of the Chief Financial Officer)

Page 9: Strategic PlanningStrategic Planning Consolidated Planning & MonitoringConsolidated Planning & Monitoring August 2014August 2014

9

What is NEW in ePlan?

Planning tool:

Enhanced needs assessment

School-level plans

Enhanced workflow for LEA plan approval by TDOE

LEA workflow to review and approve school plans

District-level and school-level plan assurances

Page 10: Strategic PlanningStrategic Planning Consolidated Planning & MonitoringConsolidated Planning & Monitoring August 2014August 2014

10

Components of the Planning Tool

1. Needs Assessment: • Multiple text boxes with guiding questions to identify

needs

2. Goals: • Descriptions • Performance Measures

3. Strategies: • Descriptions

Page 11: Strategic PlanningStrategic Planning Consolidated Planning & MonitoringConsolidated Planning & Monitoring August 2014August 2014

11

Components of the LEA Planning Tool

4. Action Steps: • Descriptions • Benchmark Indicators • Persons Responsible• Estimated Dates of Completion • Create Funding Source

Page 12: Strategic PlanningStrategic Planning Consolidated Planning & MonitoringConsolidated Planning & Monitoring August 2014August 2014

12

Needs Assessment

Identifying Areas of Need

Page 13: Strategic PlanningStrategic Planning Consolidated Planning & MonitoringConsolidated Planning & Monitoring August 2014August 2014

13

Needs AssessmentEvaluating Areas of Consideration

Special Populations

Page 14: Strategic PlanningStrategic Planning Consolidated Planning & MonitoringConsolidated Planning & Monitoring August 2014August 2014

14

NEW ePlan Enhanced Needs Assessment

NEW Enhanced Needs Assessment available September 2014

Will include multiple text boxes with guiding questions• Planning Team• Summary of Accomplishments and What’s Working• Accountability Data• Academic Data• College/Career Readiness• School Climate and Culture• Additional Areas• Prioritized List of Needs

Page 15: Strategic PlanningStrategic Planning Consolidated Planning & MonitoringConsolidated Planning & Monitoring August 2014August 2014

15

Analyzing Data for the Needs Assessment

Accountability http://

www.tn.gov/education/accountability/index.shtml TVAAS https://tvaas.sas.com/

Report Card http://www.tn.gov/education/reportcard/index.shtml

TELL Survey http://telltennessee.org/

Explore, Plan, ACT Parent Surveys Student Surveys Other LEA or school data such as pre/post testing

Future ePlan enhancement will include data elements auto populated in ePlan for the needs assessment

Page 16: Strategic PlanningStrategic Planning Consolidated Planning & MonitoringConsolidated Planning & Monitoring August 2014August 2014

16

Analyzing Data: Accountability

The prior year’s data from the accountability website should be analyzed to identify areas of need.

In this example 3-8 Math shows as “met”. However, it should be noted there was a decline in % proficient & advanced. This indicates that one of the safe harbor methods was used. Even if an indicator shows as “met” always analyze the data to ensure all areas of need are identified for the planning process.

Page 17: Strategic PlanningStrategic Planning Consolidated Planning & MonitoringConsolidated Planning & Monitoring August 2014August 2014

17

Analyzing Data:Accountability

To ensure goals are measurable, the current year’s targets should be referenced as part of the goal.

Page 18: Strategic PlanningStrategic Planning Consolidated Planning & MonitoringConsolidated Planning & Monitoring August 2014August 2014

Analyzing Data:TELL Tennessee Survey

(Teaching, Empowering, Leading and Learning)

The TELL Tennessee Survey provides educators with data, tools and direct support to facilitate school improvement. TELL Tennessee includes questions on the following topics:• Community Engagement and Support• Teacher Leadership• School Leadership• Managing Student Conduct• Use of Time• Professional Development• Facilities and Resources• Instructional Practices and Support• New Teacher Support

Page 19: Strategic PlanningStrategic Planning Consolidated Planning & MonitoringConsolidated Planning & Monitoring August 2014August 2014

Analyzing Data:Look for Relationships

Practices/Policies & Student Results

2014 – 3-8 Math % P/A ALL: 47.4% Black: 23.8% BHN: 36.4% ED: 34.7% SWD: 18.8% White: 47.9%

Two new SPED teachers Insufficient time to collaborate Interruptions to instructional

time Lack of parental involvement CCSS newly implemented Follow-up PD is not provided PD is not differentiated to the

needs of individual teachers

Consider how adult practices/policies impact your student outcomes:

Examine the relationships between the areas identified on the left and the achievement results on the right.

Page 20: Strategic PlanningStrategic Planning Consolidated Planning & MonitoringConsolidated Planning & Monitoring August 2014August 2014

20

Goals / Strategies / Action Steps

Developing SMART goalsIdentifying effective strategies

Specifying action steps and funding sources

Page 21: Strategic PlanningStrategic Planning Consolidated Planning & MonitoringConsolidated Planning & Monitoring August 2014August 2014

21

SMART GOALS

Specific• What do we need to accomplish?

Measurable• What is the target outcome?

Attainable• What is a reasonable target?

Relevant• Does the goal address an area of need?

Time-bound• Is there a specific time for attainment?

Page 22: Strategic PlanningStrategic Planning Consolidated Planning & MonitoringConsolidated Planning & Monitoring August 2014August 2014

22

Goal Example – fair…

Math Example 1: All students will be proficient in their subject area.

• Evaluating the goal– Is it specific?

» No

– Is it measurable?» Somewhat – 100% proficiency is implied

– Is it attainable?» No – it is not reasonable to expect 100% proficiency in a single

year

– Is it relevant?» Yes – math was identified in the needs assessment; increasing

student proficiency is relevant

– Is it time-bound?» No

Page 23: Strategic PlanningStrategic Planning Consolidated Planning & MonitoringConsolidated Planning & Monitoring August 2014August 2014

23

Goal Example – better…

Math Example 1: For SY 2013-14, student academic achievement will meet or

exceed the expected Achievement Targets.

• Evaluating the goal– Is it specific?

» No

– Is it measurable?» Somewhat – specific targets are not identified

– Is it attainable?» Possibly – more specifics are needed to determine

– Is it relevant?» Yes – math was identified in the needs assessment; increasing

student proficiency is relevant

– Is it time-bound?» Yes – the school year is noted

Page 24: Strategic PlanningStrategic Planning Consolidated Planning & MonitoringConsolidated Planning & Monitoring August 2014August 2014

24

Goal Example – best!

Math Example 3: For SY 2013-14, student academic achievement will meet or

exceed the expected Achievement Targets. Math 3-8: 50.7%; Algebra I: 51.3%; Algebra II: 32.5%

• Evaluating the goal– Is it specific?

» Yes

– Is it measurable?» Yes – provides targets for proficiency in each subject

– Is it attainable?» Yes – the goal is based on improvement over the prior year

results

– Is it relevant?» Yes

– Is it time-bound?» Yes

Page 25: Strategic PlanningStrategic Planning Consolidated Planning & MonitoringConsolidated Planning & Monitoring August 2014August 2014

25

ePlan Goal Components Example

Professional Development

LEA Professional Development

New Standards Training

Workshops

Mathematics: For SY 2013-14, student academic achievement will meet or exceed the expected Achievement Targets. Math 3-8: 50.7 %; Algebra I: 51.3 %; Algebra II: 32.5 % GOAL

STRATEGIES

ACTIONSTEPS

Page 26: Strategic PlanningStrategic Planning Consolidated Planning & MonitoringConsolidated Planning & Monitoring August 2014August 2014

26

GOAL: Mathematics: For SY 2013-14, student academic achievement will meet or exceed the expected Achievement Targets. Math 3-8: 50.7 %; Algebra I: 51.3 %; Algebra II: 32.5 %

Strategy: High quality professional development for instructional staff

ACTION STEP:

LEA Professio

nal Develop

ment

Description: Each certified employee will complete a minimum of three days (18 hours) of professional development during the year. In addition, each school will conduct two days (12 hours) of PD at the local school. Benchmark Indicator: Professional Development records, evaluation surveys from teachers and student performance data.Person Responsible: Always Identify PersonEstimated Completion Time: 12/20/2014

Title IIA: $10,000

Local Funds: $10,000

Page 27: Strategic PlanningStrategic Planning Consolidated Planning & MonitoringConsolidated Planning & Monitoring August 2014August 2014

27

GOAL: Mathematics: For SY 2013-14, student academic achievement will meet or exceed the expected Achievement Targets. Math 3-8: 50.7 %; Algebra I: 51.3 %; Algebra II: 32.5 %

Strategy: High quality professional development for instructional staff

ACTION STEP:

New Standards Training

Description: Teachers will participate in Common Core State Standards training in mathematics for teachers PK-12.

Benchmark Indicator: Professional Development records, evaluation surveys from teachers and student performance data.Person Responsible: Always Identify PersonEstimated Completion Time: 07/31/2014

Title IIA: $30,000 Local Funds: $10,000

Page 28: Strategic PlanningStrategic Planning Consolidated Planning & MonitoringConsolidated Planning & Monitoring August 2014August 2014

ePlan Funding Sources

Identify the specific funding source and amount that will support the accomplishment of the action step • In instances where one action step (i.e. after-school

tutoring) supports multiple goals (i.e. math and reading), you would create a funding source under each goal.

• Divide the total funds between the two goals to avoid duplication of funds.– Example: After-school tutoring in reading and math

funded with $30,000 total from Title I-A.» Under the math goal action step, create a funding

source for $15,000» Under the reading goal action step, create a

funding source for $15,000

Page 29: Strategic PlanningStrategic Planning Consolidated Planning & MonitoringConsolidated Planning & Monitoring August 2014August 2014

Planning Takeaways

Plan first, then identify funding

Examine all possible funding sources (federal, state, local, other)

Involve those with specific program knowledge in the process (i.e. allowable uses and restrictions of certain funds)

Re-examine traditional uses (i.e. we have always paid for a teacher with these funds)

Page 30: Strategic PlanningStrategic Planning Consolidated Planning & MonitoringConsolidated Planning & Monitoring August 2014August 2014

Additional Training Opportunities

ESEA Directors Institute: October 6-9, 2014 – Franklin, TN

School planning webinar: September 2014

Page 31: Strategic PlanningStrategic Planning Consolidated Planning & MonitoringConsolidated Planning & Monitoring August 2014August 2014

31

Questions?

Page 33: Strategic PlanningStrategic Planning Consolidated Planning & MonitoringConsolidated Planning & Monitoring August 2014August 2014

33

FRAUD, WASTE or ABUSE

Citizens and agencies are encouraged to report fraud, waste or abuse in State and Local government.

NOTICE: This agency is a recipient of taxpayer funding. If you observe an agency director or employee engaging in any activity which you consider to be illegal, improper or wasteful, please call the state Comptroller’s toll-free

Hotline:

1-800-232-5454

Notifications can also be submitted electronically at:

http://www.comptroller.tn.gov/hotline