statewide airport pavement management report - … · washington statewide airport pavement...

Washington Statewide Airport Pavement Management Report

p r o v i d i n g e n g i n e e r i n g s o l u t i o n s t o i m p r o v e p a v e m e n t p e r f o r m a n c e

Prepared By:

Applied Pavement Technology, Inc. 115 W. Main Street, Suite 400

Urbana, IL 61801 217-398-3977

www.appliedpavement.com

June 2013

http://www.appliedpavement.com/�

The preparation of this document may have been supported, in part, through the Airport Improvement Program financial assistance from the Federal Aviation Administration (Project Numbers 3-53-0000-009 and 3-53-0000-011) as provided under Title 49, United States Code, section 47104. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the FAA. Acceptance of this report by the FAA does not in any way constitute a commitment on the part of the United States to participate in any development depicted therein nor does it indicate that the proposed development is environmentally acceptable in accordance with appropriate public laws.

Prepared for: WSDOT Aviation

18204 59th Drive NE, Suite B Arlington, Washington 98223

Phone: 360-651-6300 www.wsdot.wa.gov/aviation

and Federal Aviation Administration

Northwest Mountain Region Seattle Airports District Office

1601 Lind Avenue S.W., Suite 250 Renton, Washington 98057

Phone: 425-227-2650

Prepared by: Applied Pavement Technology, Inc.

115 West Main Street, Suite 400 Urbana, Illinois 61801 Phone: 217-398-3977

www.appliedpavement.com

In Association with: CH2MHILL, Inc.

and CivilTech Engineering, Inc.

Washington Statewide Airport

Pavement Management Report

Washington Statewide Airport Pavement Management Report June 2013

Applied Pavement Technology, Inc. i

TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1

Project Background ..................................................................................................... 1 Scope of Work ............................................................................................................. 2 Project Findings ........................................................................................................... 5

SYSTEMS INVENTORY AND NETWORK DEFINITION ................................................ 6 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 6 Systems Inventory Process ......................................................................................... 6 Network Definition ........................................................................................................ 6 Systems Inventory Results .......................................................................................... 6

PAVEMENT EVALUATION ............................................................................................. 8 Pavement Condition Survey Procedure ....................................................................... 8 Areas Inspected ......................................................................................................... 10 Additional Data Collected .......................................................................................... 11 Pavement Evaluation Results .................................................................................... 11

PAVER™ CALIBRATION .............................................................................................. 19 Background ............................................................................................................... 19 Database-Related ...................................................................................................... 19

Network Level Calibration ...................................................................................... 19 Branch Level Calibration ........................................................................................ 19 Section Level Calibration........................................................................................ 20

Performance Modeling ............................................................................................... 21 Maintenance Policies and Pavement Repair Unit Costs ............................................ 22

PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION PROGRAM ............................. 23 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 23 Analysis Process ....................................................................................................... 23 Analysis Approach ..................................................................................................... 24

Zero Dollar Budget Analysis ................................................................................. 24 Unlimited Budget Analysis ................................................................................... 24 Constrained Budget Analysis ............................................................................... 24

PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM UPDATE REQUIREMENTS ....................... 57 System Upkeep Guidelines ....................................................................................... 57 Training Courses ....................................................................................................... 57

SUMMARY .................................................................................................................... 58


Applied Pavement Technology, Inc. ii

LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Pavement condition versus cost of repair........................................................ 1 Figure 2. Pavement area by branch use. ....................................................................... 7 Figure 3. PCI versus repair type. .................................................................................... 9 Figure 4. Visual representation of PCI scale. ............................................................... 10 Figure 5. Area-weighted PCI by branch use. ................................................................ 12 Figure 6. Pavement condition by branch use, excluding BFI, GEG, PSC, SEA, and

YKM. ...................................................................................................................... 18 Figure 7. Condition distribution. .................................................................................... 18 Figure 8. Performance model application. .................................................................... 21

LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Washington project airports by city name ......................................................... 3 Table 2. Inspection sampling rate ................................................................................ 11 Table 3. Pavement condition by airport’s associated city ............................................. 13 Table 4. Critical PCIs .................................................................................................... 23 Table 5. 8-year recommended M&R program under an unlimited funding scenario. ... 25 Table 6. Constrained budget scenario results .......................................................... 56

APPENDICES Appendix A. Inventory Summary Appendix B. FAA AC 150/5380-6B Appendix C. Cause of Distress Appendix D. Pavement Inspection Summary Appendix E. Pavement Performance Models, Unit Cost, and Work Policy Information Appendix F. 2013 Preventive Maintenance Details


Applied Pavement Technology, Inc. 1

INTRODUCTION Project Background

Applied Pavement Technology, Inc. (APTech), with assistance from CH2MHILL, Inc. (CH2MHILL) and CivilTech Engineering, Inc. (CivilTech), recently updated the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Aviation Airport Pavement Management System (APMS). The principal objective for the project was to assess the relative condition of pavements at selected Washington airports in the Washington State Airport System Plan (WSASP) and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS) using the pavement condition index (PCI) methodology. The pavement condition data were then incorporated into the APMS database and used to develop strategies for maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R) that result in the lowest life-cycle cost for those pavements. The updated APMS database provides WSDOT Aviation and the FAA with the up-to-date objective data needed to determine the validity of pavement-related funding requests, to prioritize such projects when funding levels are insufficient, and to determine whether projects are being requested in a timely manner. The timing of projects is important because preventive maintenance actions (such as crack sealing and joint resealing) can extend the life of a pavement in a very cost-effective manner. Once a pavement has deteriorated to the point where preventive maintenance is no longer the appropriate repair, it is critical to step in with major rehabilitation (such as an overlay) as soon as possible. If the pavement is allowed to continue to deteriorate, the cost for the major rehabilitation will increase significantly as the pavement structure becomes compromised. At some point, the pavement structure will become so degraded that the only viable alternative remaining is very costly reconstruction. The importance of identifying not only the type of repair but also the optimal time of repair is illustrated in figure 1. This figure shows that there is a point in a pavement’s life cycle where the rate of deterioration increases. The financial impact of delaying repairs beyond this point can be severe.

EXCELLENT

FAILED

75% OF PAVEMENT LIFE 12% OF PAVEMENT LIFE

40% DROP IN CONDITION

40% DROP IN CONDITION

$1.00 FOR M&R HERE AT 75% OF PAVEMENT LIFE

$4.00 TO $5.00 FOR M&R HERE AT 87% OF PAVEMENT LIFE

PAVEMENT AGE

PA

VE

ME

NT

CO

ND

ITIO

N

Figure 1. Pavement condition versus cost of repair.



The APMS enables WSDOT Aviation and the FAA to oversee the pavement infrastructure at the airports in the state in an effective, efficient, and reliable manner. The APMS provides the fact-based information needed to make better decisions regarding the significant investment the airport pavements represent. This in turn assists WSDOT Aviation and the FAA in being a good steward of the resources entrusted to them. The APMS also provides individual airports with the necessary information to:

Objectively monitor the condition of pavement systems.

Select more cost-effective M&R treatments.

Extend pavement life through the application of preventive maintenance actions, such as crack sealing and joint sealing.

Track the performance of selected treatments.

Provide information needed to justify and secure funding.

Show the impact of funding decisions.

Assure best return on investment.

Communicate pavement conditions and needs.

Assist Washington NPIAS airports in meeting the requirements of Public Law 103-305. Scope of Work

There are 100 airports in the WSDOT Aviation APMS database. These airports are listed in table 1. APTech assessed the pavement conditions at the majority of these airports using the PCI procedure—the industry standard in aviation for visually assessing the condition of pavements. During a PCI evaluation, inspectors walk over the pavement and identify visible signs of deterioration. Pavement defects are characterized in terms of type of distress, severity level of distress, and the quantity of distress. This information is then used to develop a composite index (PCI) that represents the overall condition of the pavement in numerical terms, ranging from 0 (failed) to 100 (excellent). The PCI is a measure of overall condition and is indicative of the level of work that will be required to maintain or repair a pavement. Further, the distress information provides insight into what is causing the pavement to deteriorate, which is the first step in selecting the appropriate repair. The PCI data from these inspections were used to update the WSDOT Aviation PAVER™ APMS database and associated maps. The data were then analyzed to determine current pavement condition, predict future pavement condition, and develop M&R programs. The results of this analysis are presented in this statewide report. In addition to this report, a web-based Interactive Data Exchange Application (IDEA) and a pavement management manual were developed. Training in the use of the PAVER™ APMS software was also provided.



Table 1. Washington project airports by city name.

Associated City

Airport Name Associated

City Airport Name

Anacortes Anacortes Odessa Odessa Municipal Arlington Arlington Municipal Okanogan Okanogan Legion Auburn Auburn Municipal Olympia Olympia Regional

Bellingham Bellingham International Omak Omak Municipal Bremerton Bremerton National Oroville Dorothy Scott Brewster Anderson Field Othello Othello Municipal

Burlington Skagit Regional Packwood Packwood Camas Grove Field Pasco1 Tri-Cities1

Cashmere Cashmere-Dryden Port Angeles William R. Fairchild International

Chehalis Chehalis-Centralia Port Townsend Jefferson County International

Chelan Lake Chelan Prosser Prosser Chewelah Sand Canyon Pullman Pullman-Moscow Regional Cle Elum Cle Elum Municipal Puyallup Pierce County-Thun Field Cle Elum DeVere Field Quillayute Quillayute

Colfax Port of Whitman Business Air Center Quincy Quincy Municipal

College Place Martin Field Renton Renton Municipal Colville Colville Municipal Republic Ferry County Concrete Mears Field (Concrete) Richland Richland

Darrington Darrington Municipal Ritzville Pru Field Davenport Davenport Municipal Rosalia Rosalia Municipal Deer Park Deer Park Municipal Seattle1 Boeing Field1 Eastsound Orcas Island Seattle1 Seattle-Tacoma International1 Eatonville Swanson Field Sekiu Sekiu

Electric City Grand Coulee Dam Sequim Sequim Valley Ellensburg Bowers Field Shelton Sanderson Field

Elma Elma Municipal Silverdale APEX Ephrata Ephrata Municipal Snohomish Harvey Field Everett Snohomish County (Paine Field) South Bend Willapa Harbor Forks Forks Municipal Spanaway Shady Acres

Friday Harbor Friday Harbor Spokane Felts Field Goldendale Goldendale Municipal Spokane Mead Flying Service Greenwater Ranger Creek State Spokane1 Spokane International1 Hoquiam Bowerman Field Stanwood Camano Island

Ilwaco Port of Ilwaco Sunnyside Sunnyside Municipal Ione Ione Municipal Tacoma Tacoma Narrows

Kelso Southwest Washington Regional Tekoa Willard Field

Kennewick Vista Field Toledo Ed Carlson Memorial-South Lewis County


Table 1. Washington project airports by city name (continued).


Associated City

Airport Name Associated

City Airport Name

Kent Crest Airpark Tonasket Tonasket Municipal Langley Whidbey Airpark Twisp Twisp Municipal

Lind Lind Municipal Vancouver Pearson Field Lopez Lopez Island Walla Walla Walla Walla Regional

Lynden Lynden Municipal Warden Warden Mansfield Mansfield Waterville Waterville Mattawa Desert Aire Wenatchee Pangborn Memorial Monroe Firstair Field Westport Westport Morton Strom Field Wilbur Wilbur Municipal

Moses Lake Grant County International Wilson Creek Wilson Creek Moses Lake Moses Lake Municipal Winthrop Methow Valley State Oak Harbor AJ Eisenberg Woodland Woodland State

Ocean Shores Ocean Shores Municipal Yakima1 Yakima Air Terminal1

1Airport was not inspected in 2012; information from existing APMS database was incorporated into the WSDOT Aviation APMS database.



Project Findings

Following is a summary of the findings of this study:

The overall pavement area of the 100 airports included in the WSDOT APMS database is 149,833,807 square feet. If Boeing Field (BFI), Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (SEA), Spokane International Airport (GEG), Tri-Cities Airport (PSC), and Yakima Air Terminal (YKM) are excluded from the analysis, the area is 102,307,739 square feet.

The 2012 condition of the entire APMS system (totaling 100 airports) was an area-

weighted PCI of 77, and the pavement system averaged 25 years of age at the time of inspection. If BFI, GEG, PSC, SEA, and YKM were excluded from the analysis, the 2012 area-weighted PCI was 75, and the area-weighted age at the time of inspection was 27 years.

In 2012, ninety-five airports were evaluated, and the area-weighted PCI was 75. In

2005, ninety-six airports were evaluated, and at that time the area-weighted condition was 77.

If no funding is provided for pavement maintenance or rehabilitation, the pavement

system (excluding BFI, GEG, PSC, SEA, and YKM) will experience a slow but steady decline in condition, with an anticipated PCI of 65 by 2020.

If all M&R projects were to be funded at the airports (excluding BFI, GEG, PSC,

SEA, and YKM), an approximate total of just over $338 million would be needed over the next 8 years. This can be further broken down into a need of $107.5 million for primary NPIAS airports, $204.2 million for non-primary NPIAS airports, and $26.5 million for non-NPIAS airports.



SYSTEMS INVENTORY AND NETWORK DEFINITION Introduction

The project began with a review of the existing inventory information for each of the airports. This information was used to update the pavement management database and associated maps as necessary to account for pavement-related work that had been undertaken since the last time the airports were evaluated in 2005. Systems Inventory Process

CH2MHILL conducted a records review to determine when and how the pavements at each of the project airports were constructed and subsequently rehabilitated, focusing on projects that had been completed since 2005. APTech then incorporated this information into the pavement management database. Existing APMS databases for BFI, GEG, PSC, SEA, and YKM were incorporated into the WSDOT Aviation APMS to obtain inventory data. Network Definition

Using the inventory data, each project airport was divided into management units. This activity consists of creating an organizational hierarchy of all airport pavements within the pavement management database. The highest level is the network. In the WSDOT Aviation database, each airport is an individual network. Each network is comprised of branches. In the airport setting, branches consist of distinct runways, taxiways, aprons, helipads, and T-hangar taxilanes and any other pavement grouping that can be defined by a change in usage. Branches are further divided into sections. Sections are parts of the branch that share common attributes, such as the cross-section, traffic level, and performance. The third subdivision or level is called a sample unit. Sample units are used during a pavement inspection. Network definition maps identifying the location of all branches, sections, and sample units were prepared by CivilTech for each airport inspected. Systems Inventory Results

The area of pavement included in the WSDOT Aviation APMS database, separated by branch use (apron/helipad, runway, taxiway, and T-hangar) is shown in figure 2. The numbers on top of each bar in these figures represent the pavement area in millions of square feet. Appendix A contains a summary of the inventory information for each airport. More detailed information is contained in the WSDOT Aviation APMS database and on the IDEA.



53.3 51.7

43.1

1.7

34.238.7

27.7

1.7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Apron/Helipad Runway Taxiway T-hangar

Pav

emen

t Are

a (m

illio

ns o

f sf)

Branch Use

All WA Airports Excluding BFI, GEG, PSC, SEA, & YKM

Figure 2. Pavement area by branch use.



PAVEMENT EVALUATION APTech inspected the pavements at the majority of the project airports between July and October 2012. BFI, GEG, PSC, SEA, and YKM were not inspected; however, the existing APMS databases for those airports were incorporated into the WSDOT Aviation APMS database to obtain condition data. Pavement Condition Survey Procedure

APTech inspected ninety-five airports in 2012 using the PCI methodology as documented in the following publications:

The FAA Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5380-6B, Guidelines and Procedures for Maintenance of Airport Pavements (a copy of this publication is located in Appendix B).

The ASTM D5340-11, Standard Test Method for Airport Pavement Condition Index Surveys.

The PCI procedure is the standard used by the aviation industry to visually assess pavement condition. It was developed to provide a consistent, objective, and repeatable tool to represent the overall pavement condition. This methodology involves walking over the pavement and identifying the type, severity, and quantity of distress present. The PCI scale ranges from 0 (representing a pavement in a failed condition) to 100 (representing a pavement in excellent condition). In general terms, pavements above a PCI of 65 that are not exhibiting significant load-related distress will benefit from preventive maintenance actions, such as crack sealing and surface treatments. Pavements with a PCI of 40 to 65 may require major rehabilitation, such as an overlay. Often, when the PCI is less than 40, reconstruction is the only viable alternative due to the substantial damage to the pavement structure. Figure 3 illustrates how the appropriate repair type varies with the PCI of a pavement section. Figure 4 shows a series of pavement photographs with associated PCIs. Appendix C identifies the distress types considered during a PCI inspection and the likely cause of each distress type. It should be noted that a PCI is based on visual signs of pavement deterioration and does not provide a measure of structural capacity.



PCI Repair Type

86-100

Preventive Maintenance 71-85

56-70

Major Rehabilitation 41-55

26-40

Reconstruction 11-25

0-10

Figure 3. PCI versus repair type.



Representative AC Pavement Surface Representative PCC Pavement Surface PCI

100

60

5

Figure 4. Visual representation of PCI scale.

Areas Inspected

By evaluating a statistically selected number of sample units, an estimate of a section’s condition can be obtained. Table 2 shows the sampling rate that WSDOT Aviation and the FAA specified for this project. In addition, areas exhibiting unusual distress or condition were inspected as additional sample units in accordance with the procedure. The section PCI is extrapolated from the PCIs of the sample units that are inspected within that section.



Table 2. Inspection sampling rate.

Asphalt Pavements PCC Pavements

N1 n2 N1 n2 N1 n2

1 – 2 All 1 – 2 All 20 – 27 9 3 – 6 3 3 – 4 3 28 – 38 10

7 – 13 4 5 – 6 4 39 – 58 11 14 – 38 5 7 – 8 5 59 – 104 12

> 38 6 9 –11 6 105 – 313 13

12 – 14 7 > 313 14 15 – 19 8

1N = the total number of sample units in the section. 2n = the number of sample units to be inspected.

Additional Data Collected

During the PCI inspections, the survey crew photographed typical pavement conditions at each airport site. These photos were incorporated into the IDEA. Pavement Evaluation Results

After the visual distress data were collected and entered into the WSDOT Aviation APMS database, the PCI for each section was calculated, and the types of distress present were analyzed. PCI distress types are characterized as load-related (such as alligator cracking and shattered slabs), climate/materials-related (such as weathering [climate-related] and durability cracking [materials-related]), and other (distress types that cannot be attributed solely to load or climate/materials). Understanding the cause of distress helps in selecting a rehabilitation alternative that corrects the cause and thus eliminates its recurrence. Appendix D lists the PCI for each section, as well as the percentage of distress identified that can be attributed to load, climate, or a combination of these factors. Additionally, Appendix D lists the overall pavement conditions of each airport along with the conditions broken out by branch use (runway, taxiway, apron/helipad, and T-hangar). Detailed distress data are available in the IDEA and the WSDOT Aviation APMS database. The 2012 area-weighted condition of all the airports in the WSDOT Aviation APMS database, including BFI, GEG, PSC, SEA, and YKM, was 77. The 2012 area-weighted condition of the airports excluding those five airports was 75. Figure 5 shows how the area-weighted PCI varies by branch use. Table 3 lists the area-weighted PCI of each airport overall and by branch use, as well as identifying key airport characteristics. Figure 6 summarizes the results of table 3. The overall condition of the pavement system decreased since the last inspection. During 2005, ninety-six airports were evaluated, and the area-weighted PCI at that time for those airports was 77. In 2012, ninety-five airports were evaluated, and the area-weighted PCI of those airports was 75.



Figure 7 shows the distribution of the pavement conditions (PCI versus pavement area) for the airports. In this figure, preventive maintenance refers to activities such as patching, crack sealing, and joint resealing, while major rehabilitation includes overlays and reconstruction.

77.074.2

79.6 77.281.1

75.071.7

76.5 76.481.1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Overall Apron/Helipad Runway Taxiway T-hangar

Are

a-w

eigh

ted

PC

I

Branch Use


Figure 5. Area-weighted PCI by branch use.

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

13

Table 3. Pavement condition by airport’s associated city.

Associated City

Airport Name Pavement Area (sf)

Airport Class.

Planning Organization

NPIASOverall

PCI Apron/

Helipad PCI Runway

PCI Taxiway

PCI T-hangar

PCI Area-Weighted

Age (years)

Washington Primary Airports

Bellingham Bellingham International 3,405,941 Primary WCOG Yes 94 89 100 97 88 10

Friday Harbor Friday Harbor 1,186,576 Primary NONE Yes 87 81 94 96 81 18

Pasco1 Tri-Cities1 5,165,934 Primary BFWW Yes 76 64 87 78 N/A 18

Port Angeles William R. Fairchild International 2,557,243 Primary PENRTPO Yes 77 84 77 70 N/A 27

Pullman Pullman-Moscow Regional 1,520,471 Primary PALRTPO Yes 90 89 100 75 N/A 7

Seattle1 Boeing Field1 6,961,502 Primary PSRC Yes 86 75 98 84 N/A 15

Seattle1 Seattle-Tacoma International1 21,270,319 Primary PSRC Yes 93 93 96 90 N/A 21

Spokane1 Spokane International1 9,278,388 Primary SRTC Yes 63 60 75 55 N/A 26

Walla Walla Walla Walla Regional 5,745,977 Primary BFWW Yes 56 72 45 56 N/A 38

Wenatchee Pangborn Memorial 2,571,848 Primary NCRTPO Yes 72 63 78 74 75 20

Yakima1 Yakima Air Terminal1 4,849,926 Primary YVCOG Yes 67 53 77 65 N/A 25

Washington Non-Primary NPIAS Airports

Anacortes Anacortes 789,831 GA SMPO Yes 88 80 93 84 95 11

Arlington Arlington Municipal 3,868,217 GA PSRC Yes 84 85 81 86 86 27

Auburn Auburn Municipal 1,362,509 Reliever PSRC Yes 66 60 77 71 N/A 25

Bremerton Bremerton National 2,445,034 GA PSRC Yes 83 71 99 78 N/A 19

Brewster Anderson Field 369,926 GA NCRTPO Yes 93 88 95 86 N/A 8

Burlington Skagit Regional 2,724,435 GA SMPO Yes 81 97 74 73 92 23

Camas Grove Field 297,869 GA SWRTC Yes 90 N/A 89 91 N/A 15

Cashmere Cashmere-Dryden 175,195 GA NCRTPO Yes 72 96 71 72 N/A 10

Chehalis Chehalis-Centralia 1,572,946 GA SWRTPO Yes 79 61 86 79 N/A 54

Chelan Lake Chelan 535,305 GA NCRTPO Yes 65 75 62 59 N/A 22

Cle Elum Cle Elum Municipal 179,076 GA QUADCO Yes 94 N/A 94 95 N/A 4

Colfax Port of Whitman Business Air Center 327,393 GA PALRTPO Yes 75 100 52 97 N/A 7

Table 3. Pavement condition by airport’s associated city (continued).

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

14

Associated City


Airport Class.


NPIASOverall

PCI Apron/

Helipad PCI Runway

PCI Taxiway

PCI T-hangar

PCI Area-Weighted

Age (years)

Davenport Davenport Municipal 267,692 GA QUADCO Yes 71 74 57 90 N/A 10

Deer Park Deer Park Municipal 1,676,097 GA SRTC Yes 84 100 85 74 N/A 11

Eastsound Orcas Island 488,495 Commercial NONE Yes 81 85 78 78 93 23

Electric City Grand Coulee Dam 425,066 GA QUADCO Yes 86 82 86 89 N/A 7

Ellensburg Bowers Field 2,765,821 GA QUADCO Yes 62 68 51 80 N/A 44

Ephrata Ephrata Municipal 3,262,902 GA QUADCO Yes 69 56 79 78 N/A 49

Everett Snohomish County (Paine Field) 9,278,673 Reliever PSRC Yes 77 68 82 87 N/A 20

Hoquiam Bowerman Field 1,437,179 GA SWRTPO Yes 78 78 78 78 N/A 24

Ione Ione Municipal 192,231 GA NEWRTPO Yes 87 48 98 8 N/A 12

Kelso Southwest Washington Regional 1,032,807 GA SWRTPO Yes 83 92 79 82 N/A 24

Lopez Lopez Island 398,096 GA NONE Yes 99 100 98 100 96 5

Moses Lake Grant County International 14,340,890 GA QUADCO Yes 73 68 83 66 N/A 40

Ocean Shores Ocean Shores Municipal 376,612 GA SWRTPO Yes 85 87 78 93 N/A 15

Odessa Odessa Municipal 300,433 GA QUADCO Yes 62 N/A 69 49 N/A 12

Olympia Olympia Regional 4,202,487 GA TRPC Yes 80 80 79 81 85 25

Omak Omak Municipal 1,208,549 GA NCRTPO Yes 67 73 64 72 N/A 20

Oroville Dorothy Scott 348,808 GA NCRTPO Yes 57 38 79 20 N/A 16

Othello Othello Municipal 339,483 GA QUADCO Yes 64 71 75 51 N/A 31

Packwood Packwood 90,414 GA SWRTPO Yes 50 55 50 N/A N/A 27

Port Townsend Jefferson County International 803,933 GA PENRTPO Yes 86 87 77 90 N/A 18

Prosser Prosser 777,617 GA BFWW Yes 86 82 88 93 N/A 11

Puyallup Pierce County-Thun Field 910,476 GA PSRC Yes 75 77 67 79 N/A 22

Quillayute Quillayute 1,286,067 GA PENRTPO Yes 70 72 71 64 N/A 69

Renton Renton Municipal 2,254,826 Reliever PSRC Yes 85 72 99 75 59 16

Richland Richland 2,183,616 GA BFWW Yes 90 80 100 91 N/A 10


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

15

Associated City


Airport Class.


NPIASOverall

PCI Apron/

Helipad PCI Runway

PCI Taxiway

PCI T-hangar

PCI Area-Weighted

Age (years)

Ritzville Pru Field 359,369 GA QUADCO Yes 69 65 66 76 N/A 13

Rosalia Rosalia Municipal 267,027 GA PALRTPO Yes 100 100 100 100 N/A 3

Shelton Sanderson Field 1,623,898 GA PENRTPO Yes 77 65 83 78 N/A 38

Snohomish Harvey Field 447,437 Reliever PSRC Yes 56 68 53 38 63 25

Spokane Felts Field 2,233,524 Reliever SRTC Yes 64 45 79 70 N/A 34

Sunnyside Sunnyside Municipal 537,808 GA YVCOG Yes 66 57 68 78 N/A 14

Tacoma Tacoma Narrows 2,527,578 GA PSRC Yes 73 75 67 74 N/A 38

Toledo Ed Carlson Memorial-South Lewis County 954,778 GA SWRTPO Yes 79 100 90 23 N/A 15

Vancouver Pearson Field 786,787 GA SWRTC Yes 73 75 70 73 N/A 19

Wilbur Wilbur Municipal 436,096 GA QUADCO Yes 96 71 99 100 N/A 4

Winthrop Methow Valley State 715,604 GA NCRTPO Yes 67 69 67 61 N/A 16

Washington Non-NPIAS Airports

Chewelah Sand Canyon 344,602 GA NEWRTPO No 52 55 70 26 N/A 21

Cle Elum DeVere Field 59,270 GA QUADCO No 57 17 62 N/A N/A 36

College Place Martin Field 478,835 GA BFWW No 41 42 50 32 N/A 43

Colville Colville Municipal 312,068 GA NEWRTPO No 69 69 75 63 N/A 15

Concrete Mears Field (Concrete) 193,196 GA SMPO No 81 82 80 85 N/A 19

Darrington Darrington Municipal 200,773 GA PSRC No 84 92 84 77 N/A 17

Eatonville Swanson Field 117,245 GA PSRC No 96 82 97 N/A N/A 15

Elma Elma Municipal 116,593 GA SWRTPO No 65 19 81 69 N/A 33

Forks Forks Municipal 324,485 GA PENRTPO No 48 63 46 45 N/A 24

Goldendale Goldendale Municipal 254,104 GA SWRTC No 74 25 84 73 N/A 10

Greenwater Ranger Creek State 86,700 GA PSRC No 41 N/A 41 N/A N/A 26

Ilwaco Port of Ilwaco 110,095 GA SWRTPO No 99 98 99 N/A N/A 7

Kennewick Vista Field 900,523 GA BFWW No 76 75 76 76 N/A 13


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

16

Associated City


Airport Class.


NPIASOverall

PCI Apron/

Helipad PCI Runway

PCI Taxiway

PCI T-hangar

PCI Area-Weighted

Age (years)

Kent Crest Airpark 345,352 GA PSRC No 61 41 67 59 N/A 27

Langley Whidbey Airpark 71,711 GA SMPO No 97 N/A 97 N/A N/A 10

Lind Lind Municipal 254,172 GA QUADCO No 86 88 84 92 N/A 6

Lynden Lynden Municipal 227,323 GA WCOG No 84 86 86 75 N/A 19

Mansfield Mansfield 172,724 GA NCRTPO No 72 61 76 66 N/A 17

Mattawa Desert Aire 393,622 GA QUADCO No 86 71 72 97 N/A 9

Monroe Firstair Field 155,760 GA PSRC No 34 21 31 43 N/A 33

Morton Strom Field 99,419 GA SWRTPO No 35 20 42 10 N/A 25

Moses Lake Moses Lake Municipal 283,716 GA QUADCO No 66 66 63 69 N/A 22

Oak Harbor AJ Eisenberg 142,276 GA SMPO No 22 29 13 79 N/A 52

Okanogan Okanogan Legion 162,100 GA NCRTPO No 54 73 43 N/A N/A 21

Quincy Quincy Municipal 300,469 GA QUADCO No 77 68 75 87 N/A 10

Republic Ferry County 228,928 GA NEWRTPO No 48 52 47 77 N/A 24

Sekiu Sekiu 253,637 GA PENRTPO No 27 37 24 N/A N/A 27

Sequim Sequim Valley 248,996 GA PENRTPO No 58 31 78 39 N/A 20

Silverdale APEX 122,343 GA PSRC No 82 N/A 87 74 N/A 29

South Bend Willapa Harbor 285,438 GA SWRTPO No 100 100 100 100 N/A 6

Spanaway Shady Acres 37,857 GA PSRC No 94 N/A 94 N/A N/A 13

Spokane Mead Flying Service 84,750 GA SRTC No 66 74 65 N/A N/A 33

Stanwood Camano Island 54,850 GA SMPO No 50 16 53 40 N/A 31

Tekoa Willard Field 116,176 GA PALRTPO No 67 56 69 74 N/A 12

Tonasket Tonasket Municipal 370,226 GA NCRTPO No 55 44 51 68 N/A 16

Twisp Twisp Municipal 272,364 GA NCRTPO No 78 62 100 20 N/A 7

Warden Warden 187,036 GA QUADCO No 66 86 63 N/A N/A 25

Waterville Waterville 254,812 GA NCRTPO No 69 64 69 78 N/A 15


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

17

Associated City


Airport Class.


NPIASOverall

PCI Apron/

Helipad PCI Runway

PCI Taxiway

PCI T-hangar

PCI Area-Weighted

Age (years)

Westport Westport 221,745 GA SWRTPO No 66 71 61 69 N/A 19

Wilson Creek Wilson Creek 223,495 GA QUADCO No 55 49 59 N/A N/A 13

Woodland Woodland State 62,985 GA SWRTPO No 96 N/A 96 N/A N/A 7

1Primary airport that was not inspected in 2012; information from existing APMS databases were incorporated into the WSDOT Aviation APMS database.



7478

7076

83

7671

80 78 80

6661

6865

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Overall Apron/Helipad Runway Taxiway T-hangar

Are

a-W

eigh

ted

PC

I

Branch Use

Primary NPIAS Non-Primary NPIAS Non-NPIAS

Figure 6. Pavement condition by branch use, excluding BFI, GEG, PSC, SEA, and YKM.

1.35.5

9.4 7.6

19.8

37.6

68.5

1.24.6 4.8 5.7

16.6

30.4

39.0

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

0-10 11-25 26-40 41-55 56-70 71-85 86-100

Pav

emen

t Are

a (m

illio

ns o

f sf)

Pavement Condition Index (PCI)


Figure 7. Condition distribution.

Preventive Maintenance

Reconstruction

Major Rehabilitation



PAVER™ CALIBRATION Background

As part of this project, the APMS software (PAVER™) was modified to reflect WSDOT Aviation’s conditions and needs. The calibration can be broken down into the following areas:

Database-Related Performance Modeling Maintenance Policies and Pavement Repair Unit Costs

Each of these areas is addressed under separate headings in this chapter. Database-Related

PAVER™ permits the user to define many database fields to meet specific requirements. This calibration occurs at three levels: the network level, the branch level, and the section level. It should be noted that the data for BFI, GEG, PSC, SEA, and YKM were obtained from previous pavement studies and not included as part of this project. In some instances, the data do not reflect the calibration identified in the following descriptions. Network Level Calibration There are 100 networks in the database—one for each airport. The network identifier for each is the city where the airport is located, such as Colville, and the network name is the full airport name, such as Colville Municipal Airport. In addition, there are user-definable fields available for use at the network level. The following user-definable fields have been assigned at the network level:

County in which the airport is located.

Airport’s FAA classification (Commercial, GA, Primary, or Reliever).

Airport’s state classification (Commercial, Regional, Community-Large, Local, or Rural Essential)

Whether the airport is part of the NPIAS.

Maximum allowable load on the primary runway (≤ 12,500 lbs, 12,500-60,000 lbs, 60,000-100,000 lbs, or > 100,000 lbs).

Ownership of the airport (Public or Private).

Whether or not the airport is located in the Puget Sound Region.

Airport’s planning organization. Branch Level Calibration Within a network are branches. A branch is a single entity that serves a distinct function; runways, taxiways, aprons, helipads, and T-hangars are branches. In PAVER™, the user is able to customize the branch identifier and the branch name. In addition, there are user-definable fields available for use at the branch level. The WSDOT Aviation PAVER™ system has been customized at the branch level as follows:



The branch identifier starts with R for runways, T for taxiways, A for aprons, HP for helipads, and TH or THANG for T-hangars. The branch identifier is completed as follows: 1) for runways, the orientation of the runway is used (e.g., R05); 2) for taxiways, T01, T02, and so on are used; and 3) aprons, helipads, and T-hangars are numbered sequentially (01, 02, and so on). The branch identifier is then finished using a two-letter code specific to each airport.

The branch name is a clear description of the branch (for example, Runway 10/28, Taxiway 01, Apron 01, Helipad 01, and T-hangar 01).

The use of the pavement is defined as runway, taxiway, apron, helipad, or T-hangar.

Two user fields at the branch level were used. One user field is used to identify the legislative district where the airport is located. The second user field is used to identify the type of lighting system for each runway as follows:

o LIRL – low intensity runway lighting

o MIRL – medium intensity runway lighting

o HIRL – high intensity runway lighting

o NON STAND – nonstandard lighting

o NONE – no lighting

Section Level Calibration Within branches are sections. In PAVER™, the user is able to customize section identifiers, from/to descriptors, use, surface type, and rank. In addition, there are user-definable fields available for use at the section level. The WSDOT Aviation system has been customized as follows:

The section identifiers within a branch are numbered 01, 02, 03, and so on.

The from/to statements are clear and match the pavement layout plan where possible.

The surface type is defined as asphalt (AC), asphalt overlay on asphalt (AAC), portland cement concrete (PCC), or asphalt overlay on PCC (APC).

A rank of primary (P) is assigned to all pavement sections.

A geographic zone has been assigned to all pavement sections according to the airport’s location in the state as follows. See Appendix A, table A-2, for identification of the region assigned to each airport.

o CSTL – coastal region

o EAST – eastern region

o NCNT – north central region

o SCNT – south central region

o WEST – western region

Three user fields at the section level were used. One user field is used to identify the type of the most recent surface treatment that a section has received, if applicable. The second user field indicates the year that this surface treatment was applied. The third user field is used to identify the funding eligibility of the section as follows:



o NPIASBOTH – Pavement areas at NPIAS airports eligible for both FAA and WSDOT Aviation funding

o NPIASWA – Pavement areas at NPIAS airports eligible only for WSDOT Aviation funding

o NonNPIASWA – Pavement areas at Non-NPIAS airports eligible only for WSDOT Aviation funding

o NONE – Pavement areas ineligible for FAA or WSDOT Aviation funding Performance Modeling

PAVER™ uses performance models to predict pavement condition into the future. It is possible within PAVER™ to develop database-specific performance models using actual pavement condition data. The prediction of the future condition of each pavement section is performed using its position relative to its performance model, as shown in figure 8. Performance characteristics such as surface type, pavement use (runway, taxiway, apron, helipad, and T-hangar), geographic region, airport classification, and maximum allowable load were investigated to determine their impact on pavement performance. Forty-two pavement performance models were selected for final use in the WSDOT Aviation APMS. Appendix E contains detailed information on these models. Note that data from BFI, GEG, PSC, SEA, and YKM were not used in determining the performance models.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 5 10 15 20 25

Time, Years

Pav

emen

t C

on

dit

ion

Ind

ex (

PC

I)

Pavement family model

Present PCI (e.g., per most recent inspection)

Modified family model

Note: The modified family model is simply the original family model shifted horizontally (e.g., in this case, the inspected pavement is deteriorating at a rate five years more slowly than the family model).

Figure 8. Performance model application.



Maintenance Policies and Pavement Repair Unit Costs

Maintenance policies for pavement were defined in conjunction with WSDOT Aviation and the FAA. These policies identify the type of maintenance action (such as crack sealing and patching) that should be considered for repairing specific distress type and severity combinations. For example, the appropriate action for repairing a medium-severity longitudinal and transverse (L&T) crack on an asphalt pavement might be crack sealing. These policies are provided in Appendix E. Unit costs for the different maintenance actions were estimated by CH2MHILL and can also be found in Appendix E. CH2MHILL estimated all unit cost information at the state level, therefore the maintenance policies and unit costs may require adjustment to reflect specific conditions at individual airports.



PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION PROGRAM Introduction

The PAVER™ APMS software is a tool that was used to develop an M&R program for the airports in the WSDOT Aviation APMS database, excluding BFI, GEG, PSC, SEA, and YKM (these five airports have their own APMS programs in place). PAVER™ is used to identify those pavement sections that have high enough PCIs for preventive maintenance actions, such as crack sealing and joint resealing, to be cost-effective. In addition, it is also used to identify those sections where major rehabilitation is warranted. PAVER™ was used to evaluate the impacts on pavement condition for various budget scenarios, as determined by WSDOT Aviation and the FAA. Through a PAVER™ analysis, the recommended work that can be completed with the funding available is identified. Work that cannot be completed within the funding constraint is deferred to later years. The impact of the work completed, in terms of area-weighted average condition, is then presented as a basis for comparison. Analysis Process

For each year of the analysis, PAVER™ applies the performance models (described previously) and estimates the future condition of the pavement sections. If a section falls below the “critical PCI,” major rehabilitation is recommended during that year. If a section is above the critical PCI, global and localized preventive maintenance may be recommended for that year. WSDOT Aviation and the FAA established the critical PCIs shown in table 4. After the treatment is selected for the pavement section, its cost is calculated using unit cost figures stored in PAVER™ and shown in Appendix E.

Table 4. Critical PCIs.

Surface Type Load

Classification Runway Taxiway

Apron/Helipad/ T-hangar

AC < 60,000# 65 60 60 ≥ 60,000# 70 65 60

PCC < 60,000# 55 50 50 ≥ 60,000# 60 55 50

The work types established by the FAA and WSDOT Aviation for the analysis are:

Reconstruction: pavements with PCIs less than 40.

Overlay: pavements with PCIs greater than 40, but less than their critical PCIs.

Fog Seals: Non-NPIAS airport pavements with PCIs ranging from 85 to 90.

Slurry Seals: Non-NPIAS airport pavements with PCIs ranging from the critical PCI to 84.

Localized preventive maintenance needs were evaluated at all airports during analysis.



Analysis Approach

Zero Dollar Budget Analysis If no funding is provided for pavement M&R, the pavement system (excluding BFI, GEG, PSC, SEA, and YKM) will experience a slow but steady decline in condition, dropping from its 2012 PCI of 75 to an anticipated PCI of 65 by 2020. The projected 2020 PCI of only pavement areas at non-primary airports that are eligible for funding is 66. Unlimited Budget Analysis Under the unlimited budget analysis, localized preventive maintenance actions were triggered in 2013 only. Major rehabilitation actions had a start date of January 2014, and these needs were determined for 7 years (2014 through 2020). An inflation factor of 2.5 percent was used. As discussed previously, pavements at BFI, GEG, PSC, SEA, and YKM were not included in this analysis. Table 5 provides a summary of the pavement repair program under the unlimited budget scenario. Detailed information on the recommended localized maintenance plan for 2013 is contained in Appendix F. If all M&R projects were to be funded at the airports (excluding BFI, GEG, PSC, SEA, and YKM), an approximate total of just over $338 million would be needed over the next 8 years. This can be further broken down into a need of $107.5 million for primary airports, $204.2 million for non-primary NPIAS airports, and $26.5 million for non-NPIAS airports eligible for state funding. The projected 2020 PCI for all airports (excluding BFI, GEG, PSC, SEA, and YKM) would be 84. The projected 2020 PCI for eligible pavement areas at non-primary airports would also be 84. Constrained Budget Analysis A second analysis was run to determine what the backlog of work would be if the current federal and state funding levels for non-primary airports remained constant at $31.5 million through 2020. This funding can be further broken down into $4.5 million annually (comprised of $1 million WSDOT Aviation funding and $3.5 million FAA funding). The $1 million WSDOT Aviation total is separated as follows: $200,000 applied to NPIAS airports and $800,000 applied to pavements at non-NPIAS airports eligible for state funding. All pavements eligible for federal and/or state funding, excluding primary airports, were considered. Localized preventive maintenance was not included in this analysis. This would leave a backlog of $257 million in pavement projects, and the area-weighted PCI of the non-primary airports would drop from the current 2012 PCI of 75 to 71 in 2020. The results of the constrained budget scenario are shown in table 6. The last column in this table, "Total Unfunded," is the amount of money that should be spent, over and above the specified budget, to address the pavement M&R needs.



Table 5. 8-year recommended M&R program under an unlimited funding scenario.

Associated City

Airport Name Plan Year

Branch Section Type of Work1 Estimated

Cost2

Anacortes Anacortes 2013 A01AN

01 Preventive Maintenance $1,843

02 Preventive Maintenance $1,23604 Preventive Maintenance $2,052

TAAN 01 Preventive Maintenance $386TH01AN 01 Preventive Maintenance $157

Arlington Arlington Municipal

2013

ABAYAR 03 Preventive Maintenance $94

AR1AR 01 Preventive Maintenance $54702 Preventive Maintenance $1,810

THGRAR 02 Preventive Maintenance $5,45510 Preventive Maintenance $87

TR2AR 01 Preventive Maintenance $1,526

2014

AMNDAR 01 Major Rehabilitation $879,297R11AR 01 Major Rehabilitation $760,921T02AR 01 Major Rehabilitation $3,083,195

THGRAR

09 Major Rehabilitation $20,28611 Major Rehabilitation $47,16212 Major Rehabilitation $34,792

05A Major Rehabilitation $47,048

TPMMAR 02 Major Rehabilitation $20,22004 Major Rehabilitation $25,239

2017 TR2AR 01 Major Rehabilitation $36,6062019 THGRAR 02 Major Rehabilitation $44,131

Auburn Auburn Municipal

2013

A01AU 01 Preventive Maintenance $33,722

A03AU 02 Preventive Maintenance $3,82203 Preventive Maintenance $34,664

A04AU 01 Preventive Maintenance $15,072

R16AU 01 Preventive Maintenance $38702 Preventive Maintenance $459

T08AU 01 Preventive Maintenance $1,557

2014

A02AU 01 Major Rehabilitation $1,966,325

TAAU 01 Major Rehabilitation $19,13002 Major Rehabilitation $16,851

TBAU 01 Major Rehabilitation $41,07002 Major Rehabilitation $431,645

TGAU 01 Major Rehabilitation $28,7562015 A05AU 01 Major Rehabilitation $11,5032017 A03AU 03 Major Rehabilitation $124,4002018 R16AU 02 Major Rehabilitation $339,763


Table 5. 8-year recommended M&R program under an unlimited funding scenario (continued).


Associated City



Cost2

Bellingham Bellingham International

2013

A01BL 01 Preventive Maintenance $6,714

AGABL 01 Preventive Maintenance $35103 Preventive Maintenance $6404 Preventive Maintenance $1,850

TDBL 02 Preventive Maintenance $143TFBL 05 Preventive Maintenance $285

THANGBL 01 Preventive Maintenance $27303 Preventive Maintenance $6,94504 Preventive Maintenance $15,756

2014 AGABL 05 Major Rehabilitation $185,904

TFBL 02 Major Rehabilitation $74,43103 Major Rehabilitation $44,748

2018 TFBL 05 Major Rehabilitation $44,8032020 AGABL 04 Major Rehabilitation $619,800

Bremerton Bremerton National

2013

A02BR

01 Preventive Maintenance $254



A03BR





A05BR 01 Preventive Maintenance $236

AFUELBR 01 Preventive Maintenance $13,756

AH2BR 01 Preventive Maintenance $88

T01BR




TABR





TBBR 01 Preventive Maintenance $117

TFBR 01 Preventive Maintenance $81


TJBR 01 Preventive Maintenance $21

2014 A02BR 04 Major Rehabilitation $493,934

05 Major Rehabilitation $311,407




Associated City



Cost2


2014

A03BR 02 Major Rehabilitation $693,361

A04BR 01 Major Rehabilitation $639,221


T01BR 03 Major Rehabilitation $78,770

TABR 04 Major Rehabilitation $27,999TCBR 01 Major Rehabilitation $23,229TDBR 01 Major Rehabilitation $33,945TEBR 01 Major Rehabilitation $58,934TFBR 03 Major Rehabilitation $28,124TGBR 01 Major Rehabilitation $46,041

2017 A03BR 03 Major Rehabilitation $367,601TABR 03 Major Rehabilitation $251,862

2019

A03BR 04 Major Rehabilitation $138,049AFUELBR 01 Major Rehabilitation $45,322

TABR 02 Major Rehabilitation $244,23105 Major Rehabilitation $47,316

TFBR 02 Major Rehabilitation $13,692

Brewster Anderson Field 2014 A02BW 01 Major Rehabilitation $90,412T03BW 01 Major Rehabilitation $87,420

Burlington Skagit Regional

2013

AESK 01 Preventive Maintenance $60T04SK 01 Preventive Maintenance $42T05SK 01 Preventive Maintenance $434T06SK 01 Preventive Maintenance $225

2014 R04SK

01 Major Rehabilitation $2,072,41402 Major Rehabilitation $623,64903 Major Rehabilitation $896,670

T04SK 02 Major Rehabilitation $256,687TFSK 01 Major Rehabilitation $4,238,469

Camas Grove Field 2013

R07CA 01 Preventive Maintenance $1,211T01CA 03 Preventive Maintenance $550

T03CA 01 Preventive Maintenance $13,19903 Preventive Maintenance $1,201

Cashmere Cashmere-Dryden 2013

R07CD 01 Preventive Maintenance $864T01CD 01 Preventive Maintenance $234

2014 T02CD 01 Major Rehabilitation $213,4742017 R07CD 01 Major Rehabilitation $136,479

Chehalis Chehalis-Centralia 2013 ABCS 01 Preventive Maintenance $2,390

APRNCS 01 Preventive Maintenance $93




Associated City



Cost2

Chehalis Chehalis-Centralia

2013

APRNCS 02 Preventive Maintenance $17,20803 Preventive Maintenance $172

R16CS 01A Preventive Maintenance $203,81901B Preventive Maintenance $53,259

T05CS 01 Preventive Maintenance $23T06CS 01 Preventive Maintenance $45TA3CS 01 Preventive Maintenance $60TA4CS 01 Preventive Maintenance $35,365TA5CS 01 Preventive Maintenance $4,679TACS 01 Preventive Maintenance $202,023

TCLCS 01 Preventive Maintenance $78,494

2014

A02CS 01 Major Rehabilitation $71,887AACS 01 Major Rehabilitation $151,355ACCS 01 Major Rehabilitation $83,796

ADCS 01 Major Rehabilitation $666,05602 Major Rehabilitation $86,514

AFBOCS 01 Major Rehabilitation $701,055T01CS 01 Major Rehabilitation $260,950T02CS 01 Major Rehabilitation $344,879T03CS 01 Major Rehabilitation $42,059T04CS 01 Major Rehabilitation $183,463TA2CS 01 Major Rehabilitation $29,162

2016 APRNCS 02 Major Rehabilitation $188,3022019 ABCS 01 Major Rehabilitation $9,746

Chelan Lake Chelan

2013 A02CN 01 Preventive Maintenance $228A03CN 01 Preventive Maintenance $2,066

2014

A01CN 01 Major Rehabilitation $9,356A02CN 03 Major Rehabilitation $37,457A04CN 01 Major Rehabilitation $9,469R02CN 01 Major Rehabilitation $295,736T01CN 01 Major Rehabilitation $51,892

T02CN 01 Major Rehabilitation $36,69202 Major Rehabilitation $574,055

T03CN 01 Major Rehabilitation $42,6022020 A02CN 01 Major Rehabilitation $44,699

Chewelah Sand Canyon 2013 R17CH 01 Preventive Maintenance $6,371

2014 A01CH 01 Major Rehabilitation $84,255A02CH 01 Major Rehabilitation $38,417




Associated City



Cost2

Chewelah Sand Canyon 2014

R17CH 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $168,782T01CH 01 Major Rehabilitation $1,050,503T02CH 01 Major Rehabilitation $2,402T03CH 01 Major Rehabilitation $18,152T04CH 01 Major Rehabilitation $4,042T05CH 01 Major Rehabilitation $9,356

2018 R17CH 01 Major Rehabilitation $252,710

Cle Elum DeVere Field 2014 A01DV 01 Major Rehabilitation $64,828R08DV 01 Major Rehabilitation $73,752

Colfax Port Of Whitman Business Air Center

2014 R07CF 01 Major Rehabilitation $41,55902 Major Rehabilitation $153,41503 Major Rehabilitation $35,106

2015 T03CF 01 Major Rehabilitation $4,2972019 T05CF 01 Major Rehabilitation $22,190

College Place Martin Field

2013 A01CP 02 Preventive Maintenance $2,212R05CP 01 Preventive Maintenance $1,489

2014

A01CP 01 Major Rehabilitation $43,02503 Major Rehabilitation $28,306

R05CP 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $85,06102 Major Rehabilitation $1,440,695

T01CP 01 Major Rehabilitation $2,194,590

Colville Colville Municipal

2013

A01CO 02 Preventive Maintenance $89

A03CO 01 Preventive Maintenance $107


A04CO 01 Preventive Maintenance $8,896

R01CO 01 Preventive Maintenance $3,095

T01CO 01 Preventive Maintenance $32

T05CO 01 Preventive Maintenance $315

2014

A01CO 01 Major Rehabilitation $10,779

02 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $9,095


A03CO 02 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $3,643

A04CO 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $54,925


R01CO 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $129,062

T01CO 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $6,870





Associated City



Cost2


2014

T02CO




T03CO 01 Surface Treatment - Fog Seal $642

T05CO 01 Surface Treatment - Fog Seal $8,663

2016 A03CO 01 Major Rehabilitation $6,294




R01CO 01 Major Rehabilitation $203,021

Concrete Mears Field (Concrete)

2013 A02CC 01 Preventive Maintenance $420

2014

A02CC 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $14,022A04CC 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $5,367

R07CC 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $7,94602 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $180,884

T01CC 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $10,2942018 A04CC 01 Major Rehabilitation $7,275

Darrington Darrington Municipal

2013 T01DR 01 Preventive Maintenance $10,127

2014 R10DR 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $116,383T01DR 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $68,092

2015 A01DR 01 Surface Treatment - Fog Seal $8,113

Davenport Davenport Municipal

2013

A01DA 01 Preventive Maintenance $1,307

A02DA 01 Preventive Maintenance $675

T01DA 01 Preventive Maintenance $329

T02DA 01 Preventive Maintenance $372

2014 R05DA 01 Major Rehabilitation $174,725

2019 A01DA 01 Major Rehabilitation $51,144

Deer Park Deer Park Municipal

2013

R04DP 01 Preventive Maintenance $31,483

R16DP 01 Preventive Maintenance $43

TA1DP 01 Preventive Maintenance $352

TA2DP 01 Preventive Maintenance $3,531

TA3DP 01 Preventive Maintenance $1,333

TA4DP 01 Preventive Maintenance $757

TBDP 01 Preventive Maintenance $210

2014

TA5DP 01 Major Rehabilitation $91,464

TCDP 01 Major Rehabilitation $2,355,268





Associated City



Cost2

Deer Park Deer Park Municipal 2019 TA3DP 01 Major Rehabilitation $40,269

Eastsound Orcas Island

2013

HP01OR 01 Preventive Maintenance $1,589

R16OR 01 Preventive Maintenance $31402 Preventive Maintenance $659

TA1OR 01 Preventive Maintenance $482014 A01OR 02 Major Rehabilitation $138,6242019 R16OR 01 Major Rehabilitation $193,855

2020 R16OR 02 Major Rehabilitation $90,863TA1OR 01 Major Rehabilitation $8,756

Eatonville Swanson Field 2013

A01EA 01 Preventive Maintenance $109A02EA 01 Preventive Maintenance $32

2019 R16EA 01 Surface Treatment - Fog Seal $22,469

Electric City Grand Coulee Dam 2013

A01EC 01 Preventive Maintenance $598R03EC 01 Preventive Maintenance $2,632T01EC 01 Preventive Maintenance $5T02EC 01 Preventive Maintenance $264T03EC 01 Preventive Maintenance $71

Ellensburg Bowers Field

2013

A01EL





R11EL 01B Preventive Maintenance $2,993

T02EL 01 Preventive Maintenance $6,746

T06EL 01 Preventive Maintenance $1,475

TAEL





TFEL 01 Preventive Maintenance $228

2014

R07EL

01A Major Rehabilitation $2,552,840

01B Major Rehabilitation $1,276,573

02A Major Rehabilitation $5,192,618

02B Major Rehabilitation $4,701,583


R11EL 01A Major Rehabilitation $6,764,326


T01EL 01 Major Rehabilitation $126,172




Associated City



Cost2


2014 T01EL 02 Major Rehabilitation $405,126

2018 A01EL 03 Major Rehabilitation $499,600

2020 TAEL 02 Major Rehabilitation $49,102

Elma Elma Municipal

2013 R25EM



T01EM 01 Preventive Maintenance $1,633

2014

A01EM 01 Major Rehabilitation $201,519

R25EM 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $5,460


T01EM 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $7,772

2019 R25EM 01 Major Rehabilitation $7,587

2020 T01EM 01 Major Rehabilitation $11,068

Ephrata Ephrata Municipal

2013

TB1EP 03 Preventive Maintenance $87

TBEP 01 Preventive Maintenance $258


2014

A01EP

01 Major Rehabilitation $577,43702 Major Rehabilitation $2,186,22703 Major Rehabilitation $607,88204 Major Rehabilitation $926,14105 Major Rehabilitation $926,14106 Major Rehabilitation $39,24007 Major Rehabilitation $521,68208 Major Rehabilitation $92,200

R04EP 01 Major Rehabilitation $1,326,095TA2EP 01 Major Rehabilitation $30,366TB1EP 02 Major Rehabilitation $238,225TBEP 02 Major Rehabilitation $642,989TCEP 01 Major Rehabilitation $203,340

Everett Snohomish County (Paine Field) 2013

AARMYPF 02 Preventive Maintenance $128,96704 Preventive Maintenance $23,05408 Preventive Maintenance $30,171

ACENTPF 03 Preventive Maintenance $1,03904 Preventive Maintenance $3,817

ACHPF 01 Preventive Maintenance $370ACTPF 01 Preventive Maintenance $43,676AEHPF 01 Preventive Maintenance $981AERPF 01 Preventive Maintenance $29,484




Associated City



Cost2

Everett Snohomish County (Paine Field)

2013

AH16LPF 01 Preventive Maintenance $15

AITRPF 01 Preventive Maintenance $6,30302 Preventive Maintenance $585

AMESSPF 03 Preventive Maintenance $35,444

ANRPF 04 Preventive Maintenance $1,85315 Preventive Maintenance $3,354

AWRPF 01 Preventive Maintenance $59,743

R16RPF 01B Preventive Maintenance $807A Preventive Maintenance $2507B Preventive Maintenance $5

TA9PF 03 Preventive Maintenance $21504 Preventive Maintenance $81

TAPF 13 Preventive Maintenance $3221 Preventive Maintenance $1,166

TCPF 01 Preventive Maintenance $32903 Preventive Maintenance $6

TD0PF 01 Preventive Maintenance $2702 Preventive Maintenance $2803 Preventive Maintenance $32

TD1PF 01 Preventive Maintenance $87TD2PF 03 Preventive Maintenance $1,878TD3PF 01 Preventive Maintenance $7TD4PF 01 Preventive Maintenance $25

TDPF

01 Preventive Maintenance $25402 Preventive Maintenance $16303 Preventive Maintenance $48805 Preventive Maintenance $9,650

TEPF 01 Preventive Maintenance $4,390TFPF 01 Preventive Maintenance $323

TG4PF 01 Preventive Maintenance $89

TG6PF 01 Preventive Maintenance $2302 Preventive Maintenance $87

TGPF 01 Preventive Maintenance $54,89102 Preventive Maintenance $42,999

TINTPF 02 Preventive Maintenance $180

2014 AARMYPF 03 Major Rehabilitation $959,26506 Major Rehabilitation $1,008,09607 Major Rehabilitation $263,077




Associated City



Cost2

Everett Snohomish County (Paine Field) 2014

ABTRPF 02 Major Rehabilitation $299,644ACENTPF 05 Major Rehabilitation $214,903

ACHPF

02 Major Rehabilitation $1,421,60803 Major Rehabilitation $3,059,94704 Major Rehabilitation $888,53305 Major Rehabilitation $1,011,407

AFUELPF 01 Major Rehabilitation $104,482

AMESSPF 01 Major Rehabilitation $63,39902 Major Rehabilitation $238,694

ANRPF

01 Major Rehabilitation $320,78702 Major Rehabilitation $98,23703 Major Rehabilitation $52,25205 Major Rehabilitation $129,81706 Major Rehabilitation $108,34307 Major Rehabilitation $16,57908 Major Rehabilitation $170,95309 Major Rehabilitation $170,12510 Major Rehabilitation $10,96411 Major Rehabilitation $46,06112 Major Rehabilitation $11,43513 Major Rehabilitation $129,75116 Major Rehabilitation $29,607

AOTRPF 01 Major Rehabilitation $2,378,226ASRPF 01 Major Rehabilitation $222,660

AWASHEPF 01 Major Rehabilitation $74,489

AWRPF

02 Major Rehabilitation $2,261,06105 Major Rehabilitation $74,55506 Major Rehabilitation $167,31207 Major Rehabilitation $1,054,297

R16LPF 01 Major Rehabilitation $3,482,436R16RPF 06A Major Rehabilitation $290,662

TA9PF 01 Major Rehabilitation $40,49505 Major Rehabilitation $5,706

TAAPF 02 Major Rehabilitation $7,29303 Major Rehabilitation $13,479

TBPF 01 Major Rehabilitation $435,84803 Major Rehabilitation $73,688

TCPF 06 Major Rehabilitation $165,330




Associated City



Cost2


2014

TD5PF 01 Major Rehabilitation $259,139

TDPF 04 Major Rehabilitation $102,15206 Major Rehabilitation $503,08007 Major Rehabilitation $552,593

TF2PF 01 Major Rehabilitation $16,370TG1PF 01 Major Rehabilitation $73,627TG2PF 01 Major Rehabilitation $15,487TG5PF 01 Major Rehabilitation $48,184

THPF 01 Major Rehabilitation $9,59002 Major Rehabilitation $1,020,386

2015 R16RPF 01A Major Rehabilitation $80,373TA9PF 02 Major Rehabilitation $39,334

2016 AERPF 01 Major Rehabilitation $492,042TDPF 02 Major Rehabilitation $13,950

2017 TAPF 21 Major Rehabilitation $277,703TEPF 01 Major Rehabilitation $444,803

2019 AARMYPF 08 Major Rehabilitation $273,489

ANRPF 15 Major Rehabilitation $66,538TG6PF 02 Major Rehabilitation $26,177

2020

ACTPF 01 Major Rehabilitation $681,670TD2PF 03 Major Rehabilitation $18,535TD4PF 01 Major Rehabilitation $16,550TFPF 02 Major Rehabilitation $135,690

Forks Forks Municipal

2013 A01FO 01 Preventive Maintenance $2,843

2014 R04FO 01 Major Rehabilitation $1,017,038T01FO 01 Major Rehabilitation $513,245

2016 A01FO 01 Major Rehabilitation $57,808

Friday Harbor Friday Harbor

2013

AFUELFH 01 Preventive Maintenance $22ARES1FH 01 Preventive Maintenance $15ARES2FH 01 Preventive Maintenance $8

ATRANSFH 01 Preventive Maintenance $244TAFH 02 Preventive Maintenance $1,097TGFH 01 Preventive Maintenance $1,537

THANG1FH 03 Preventive Maintenance $1,826THANG3FH 01 Preventive Maintenance $361

TIAFH 01 Preventive Maintenance $1,636

2014 AIAFH 01 Major Rehabilitation $36,17402 Major Rehabilitation $39,004




Associated City



Cost2

Friday Harbor Friday Harbor 2014

THANG1FH 02 Major Rehabilitation $36,893THANG2FH 02 Major Rehabilitation $75,573

Goldendale Goldendale Municipal

2013 R07GO 01 Preventive Maintenance $86T01GO 01 Preventive Maintenance $3,353T03GO 01 Preventive Maintenance $8,030

2014

A03GO 01 Major Rehabilitation $194,355R07GO 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $171,973T01GO 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $47,921T02GO 01 Major Rehabilitation $32,819T03GO 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $39,602

Greenwater Ranger Creek State 2014 R15RC 01 Major Rehabilitation $614,963

Hoquiam Bowerman Field

2013

A01HO 01 Preventive Maintenance $23A02HO 02 Preventive Maintenance $1,861

A03HO 01 Preventive Maintenance $3,41603 Preventive Maintenance $7,20504 Preventive Maintenance $74

R06HO

01A Preventive Maintenance $3302A Preventive Maintenance $52002B Preventive Maintenance $20803A Preventive Maintenance $1103B Preventive Maintenance $8

T01HO 01 Preventive Maintenance $476

2014

A02HO 01 Major Rehabilitation $1,010,934T02HO 01 Major Rehabilitation $11,831T03HO 01 Major Rehabilitation $12,327T04HO 01 Major Rehabilitation $90,158T05HO 01 Major Rehabilitation $60,326T06HO 01 Major Rehabilitation $51,398T07HO 01 Major Rehabilitation $60,343T08HO 01 Major Rehabilitation $49,410

2016 R06HO 03A Major Rehabilitation $30,8532018 R06HO 03B Major Rehabilitation $16,207

2019 R06HO 01B Major Rehabilitation $16,61202A Major Rehabilitation $1,041,187

2020 R06HO 01A Major Rehabilitation $34,056

Ione Ione Municipal 2014 A01IO 01 Major Rehabilitation $62,798T01IO 01 Major Rehabilitation $131,021T02IO 01 Major Rehabilitation $9,962




Associated City



Cost2

Kelso Southwest Washington Regional

2013

A01KL 01 Preventive Maintenance $1,116

R12KL 01 Preventive Maintenance $71002 Preventive Maintenance $2,719

T01KL 01 Preventive Maintenance $339T02KL 02 Preventive Maintenance $203T03KL 01 Preventive Maintenance $108

TAKL 01 Preventive Maintenance $1,77602 Preventive Maintenance $3,16203 Preventive Maintenance $822

TBKL 02 Preventive Maintenance $112TCKL 01 Preventive Maintenance $217

2014

A02KL 03 Major Rehabilitation $114,52304 Major Rehabilitation $163,315

T02KL 01 Major Rehabilitation $16,31403 Major Rehabilitation $109,322

T04KL 01 Major Rehabilitation $11,9152017 R12KL 02 Major Rehabilitation $18,9752019 A01KL 01 Major Rehabilitation $59,781

Kennewick Vista Field

2013

A01KW




AHLD20KW 01 Preventive Maintenance $179

R02KW 01 Preventive Maintenance $5,456


T01KW 01 Preventive Maintenance $1,551


T02KW 01 Preventive Maintenance $55

TA1KW 01 Preventive Maintenance $37

TAKW 01 Preventive Maintenance $5,049

2014

A01KW


02 Surface Treatment - Fog Seal $6,460


AHLD20KW 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $9,483

R02KW 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $360,474


T01KW 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $50,908





Associated City



Cost2


2014



TA1KW 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $9,109


2016 TAKW 01 Major Rehabilitation $252,491

2018 A01KW 01 Major Rehabilitation $174,770

2019 R02KW 02 Major Rehabilitation $112,936

T01KW 01 Major Rehabilitation $107,213

2020 A01KW 03 Major Rehabilitation $96,507

AHLD20KW 01 Major Rehabilitation $20,470T01KW 03 Major Rehabilitation $54,264

Kent Crest Airpark

2013 T01KE 01 Preventive Maintenance $122

2014

A01KE 01 Major Rehabilitation $228,799R15KE 01 Major Rehabilitation $210,967T01KE 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $114,243T02KE 01 Major Rehabilitation $325,252T03KE 01 Major Rehabilitation $13,733

2020 T01KE 01 Major Rehabilitation $162,703

Langley Whidbey Airpark 2013 R16LA 01 Preventive Maintenance $9,0062019 R16LA 01 Surface Treatment - Fog Seal $14,969

Lind Lind Municipal

2013 A01LI 01 Preventive Maintenance $221R05LI 01 Preventive Maintenance $1,770T01LI 01 Preventive Maintenance $126

2014 A01LI 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $65,158R05LI 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $159,014T01LI 01 Surface Treatment - Fog Seal $3,224

2019 A01LI 02 Surface Treatment - Fog Seal $3,047

Lynden Lynden Municipal

2013 A01LY 01 Preventive Maintenance $139T02LY 01 Preventive Maintenance $3,236T03LY 01 Preventive Maintenance $1,296

2014

A01LY 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $56,303

A02LY 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $21,96102 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $7,295

R07LY 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $129,150T01LY 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $34,324T03LY 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $5,398T04LY 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $4,744




Associated City



Cost2

Lynden Lynden Municipal 2017 T02LY 01 Major Rehabilitation $8,534

Mansfield Mansfield

2013

A01MA 01 Preventive Maintenance $11,545A04MA 01 Preventive Maintenance $1,891R03MA 01 Preventive Maintenance $2,306T01MA 01 Preventive Maintenance $1,222T02MA 01 Preventive Maintenance $1,567

2014 A01MA 02 Major Rehabilitation $49,202A03MA 01 Major Rehabilitation $31,715

2016 A04MA 01 Major Rehabilitation $7,008T02MA 01 Major Rehabilitation $6,642

2017 A01MA 01 Major Rehabilitation $45,367T01MA 01 Major Rehabilitation $8,134

Mattawa Desert Aire

2013 A01MT 01 Preventive Maintenance $1,477R10MT 01 Preventive Maintenance $5,403T01MT 01 Preventive Maintenance $1,109

2014 A01MT 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $41,364R10MT 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $136,628

2018 T01MT 01 Surface Treatment - Fog Seal $22,404

2020 A01MT 01 Major Rehabilitation $65,068R10MT 01 Major Rehabilitation $214,923T02MT 01 Surface Treatment - Fog Seal $21,260

Monroe Firstair Field 2014

A01MN 01 Major Rehabilitation $36,068A02MN 01 Major Rehabilitation $28,145A08MN 01 Major Rehabilitation $115,779

R07MN 01 Major Rehabilitation $373,34002 Major Rehabilitation $117,035

T01MN

01 Major Rehabilitation $35,58402 Major Rehabilitation $94,38003 Major Rehabilitation $55,89504 Major Rehabilitation $90,387

Morton Strom Field 2014

A01MO 01 Major Rehabilitation $74,008A02MO 01 Major Rehabilitation $67,447A03MO 01 Major Rehabilitation $3,812R07MO 01 Major Rehabilitation $510,696T01MO 01 Major Rehabilitation $51,339

Moses Lake

Grant County International 2013 A01GC

01 Preventive Maintenance $72,34003 Preventive Maintenance $47,35306 Preventive Maintenance $224,802




Associated City



Cost2

Moses Lake

Grant County International

2013

A01GC 08 Preventive Maintenance $282,55609 Preventive Maintenance $316,969

ACOLUMBGC 01 Preventive Maintenance $103,520AEASTGC 01 Preventive Maintenance $1,160,039AFUELGC 01 Preventive Maintenance $4,540

AHELIPADGC 01 Preventive Maintenance $272

R14LGC

01C Preventive Maintenance $53,27101W Preventive Maintenance $97,56202C Preventive Maintenance $17,464

02OW Preventive Maintenance $11,72702W Preventive Maintenance $8,17003W Preventive Maintenance $1,67104C Preventive Maintenance $26,34404W Preventive Maintenance $96,792

R22GC

01 Preventive Maintenance $3,48303C Preventive Maintenance $25803W Preventive Maintenance $26304W Preventive Maintenance $95

R927GC 01 Preventive Maintenance $157,880TA3GC 01 Preventive Maintenance $5,624

TAGC 01 Preventive Maintenance $6,09802 Preventive Maintenance $1,56903 Preventive Maintenance $1,937

TBGC 01 Preventive Maintenance $13,063TCGC 01 Preventive Maintenance $1,269

TCOMPASSGC 01 Preventive Maintenance $57,691TEGC 01 Preventive Maintenance $12,346

TFGC

01 Preventive Maintenance $5,98002 Preventive Maintenance $28403 Preventive Maintenance $1,15704 Preventive Maintenance $254

TG1GC 01 Preventive Maintenance $12,673TG2GC 01 Preventive Maintenance $15,801TGGC 03 Preventive Maintenance $10,836THGC 02 Preventive Maintenance $29,680TJ1GC 01 Preventive Maintenance $108TJ3GC 01 Preventive Maintenance $31

2014 A01GC 02 Major Rehabilitation $14,829,296




Associated City



Cost2

Moses Lake


2014

A01GC 05 Major Rehabilitation $13,584,17107 Major Rehabilitation $4,427,80510 Major Rehabilitation $2,279,827

AEASTGC 03 Major Rehabilitation $2,386,63904 Major Rehabilitation $858,357

AMGC 01 Major Rehabilitation $50,60702 Major Rehabilitation $236,237

R14LGC 04OW Major Rehabilitation $236,606R22GC 05 Major Rehabilitation $19,219TA1GC 01 Major Rehabilitation $1,016,840TA2GC 01 Major Rehabilitation $425,217TGGC 02 Major Rehabilitation $11,765,458THGC 01 Major Rehabilitation $309,790

2015 R18GC 01 Major Rehabilitation $657,3632016 A01GC 06 Major Rehabilitation $633,1092017 A01GC 08 Major Rehabilitation $923,372

2020 A01GC

01 Major Rehabilitation $1,278,72609 Major Rehabilitation $1,032,668

R22GC 02C Major Rehabilitation $641,68003W Major Rehabilitation $164,793

Moses Lake

Moses Lake Municipal

2013

A01ML 02 Preventive Maintenance $425AHLD34ML 01 Preventive Maintenance $248

R16ML 03 Preventive Maintenance $442

T01ML 02 Preventive Maintenance $11103 Preventive Maintenance $269

T02ML 01 Preventive Maintenance $14202 Preventive Maintenance $93303 Preventive Maintenance $205

2014

A01ML 01 Major Rehabilitation $9,830AHLD16ML 01 Major Rehabilitation $78,458

R16ML 01 Major Rehabilitation $11,55002 Major Rehabilitation $123,486

T01ML 01 Major Rehabilitation $60,8522017 T02ML 01 Major Rehabilitation $8,428

2019 AHLD34ML 01 Major Rehabilitation $12,712

T02ML 02 Major Rehabilitation $72,63503 Major Rehabilitation $17,102

Oak Harbor AJ Eisenberg 2013 TAOH 01 Preventive Maintenance $2,013




Associated City



Cost2

Oak Harbor AJ Eisenberg 2014

A01OH 01 Major Rehabilitation $146,534A02OH 01 Major Rehabilitation $118,922

AHLD07OH 01 Major Rehabilitation $42,949AHLD25OH 01 Major Rehabilitation $41,104RW0725OH 01 Major Rehabilitation $603,444

Ocean Shores

Ocean Shores Municipal

2013 A01OS 01 Preventive Maintenance $4R15OS 01 Preventive Maintenance $19,204

2014 T01OS 01 Major Rehabilitation $40,13503 Major Rehabilitation $23,470

2017 R15OS 01 Major Rehabilitation $207,317

Odessa Odessa Municipal

2013

R02OD 01 Preventive Maintenance $3,49902 Preventive Maintenance $3,532

T01OD 01 Preventive Maintenance $125T02OD 01 Preventive Maintenance $134T03OD 01 Preventive Maintenance $30

2014 T04OD 01 Major Rehabilitation $729,6312016 R02OD 01 Major Rehabilitation $134,9942017 T01OD 01 Major Rehabilitation $7,9382018 R02OD 02 Major Rehabilitation $148,803

Okanogan Okanogan Legion

2013 A01OK 01 Preventive Maintenance $6,694

2014 A01OK 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $59,292R04OK 01 Major Rehabilitation $906,214

2020 A01OK 01 Major Rehabilitation $93,269

Olympia Olympia Regional

2013

ACOV1OL 01 Preventive Maintenance $79AHFGHOL 01 Preventive Maintenance $51

ASPOL 01 Preventive Maintenance $235ATERMOL 01 Preventive Maintenance $2,159

R08OL 01B Preventive Maintenance $9R17OL 02B Preventive Maintenance $457TAOL 01 Preventive Maintenance $374TFOL 01 Preventive Maintenance $3,141

THFOL 01 Preventive Maintenance $677THGOL 02 Preventive Maintenance $8THHOL 01 Preventive Maintenance $42

TTERMOL 02 Preventive Maintenance $426

2014 A01OL 01 Major Rehabilitation $298,328

AFISHOL 01 Major Rehabilitation $32,301AHDEOL 02 Major Rehabilitation $117,187




Associated City



Cost2


2014

APEAOL 01 Major Rehabilitation $347,795ATRANSOL 02 Major Rehabilitation $34,228

R08OL 01A Major Rehabilitation $917,92302A Major Rehabilitation $6,800,007

TCOL 01 Major Rehabilitation $1,428,805TCOVOL 01 Major Rehabilitation $124,749

TDOL 01 Major Rehabilitation $37,076

TFOL 02 Major Rehabilitation $16,01503 Major Rehabilitation $95,260

TGOL 02 Major Rehabilitation $2,462,485THAOL 01 Major Rehabilitation $51,955THBOL 01 Major Rehabilitation $19,745THCOL 01 Major Rehabilitation $84,166

TWOL 01 Major Rehabilitation $27,89903 Major Rehabilitation $554,481

2016 THFOL 01 Major Rehabilitation $78,491

TTERMOL 02 Major Rehabilitation $88,083

2020 ACOV1OL 01 Major Rehabilitation $125,987ATERMOL 01 Major Rehabilitation $469,368

THGOL 02 Major Rehabilitation $12,746

Omak Omak Municipal

2013

A01OM 01 Preventive Maintenance $945A02OM 01 Preventive Maintenance $2,639R17OM 01B Preventive Maintenance $1,065T01OM 01 Preventive Maintenance $10,554T06OM 01 Preventive Maintenance $66

2014 R17OM 01A Major Rehabilitation $6,291,262

T01OM 02 Major Rehabilitation $134,42703 Major Rehabilitation $909,788

2016 T01OM 01 Major Rehabilitation $105,2052017 A02OM 01 Major Rehabilitation $480,107

Oroville Dorothy Scott

2013 R15OV 01 Preventive Maintenance $58

2014

A01OV 01 Major Rehabilitation $46,821


T01OV 01 Major Rehabilitation $50,615








Associated City



Cost2

Othello Othello Municipal

2013 A01OT 01 Preventive Maintenance $52A02OT 01 Preventive Maintenance $17TAOT 02 Preventive Maintenance $16

2014 A01OT 02 Major Rehabilitation $37,841A03OT 01 Major Rehabilitation $44,229TAOT 01 Major Rehabilitation $1,000,858

2017 A01OT 01 Major Rehabilitation $10,2532020 R07OT 01 Major Rehabilitation $268,215

Packwood Packwood 2014 A01PA 01 Major Rehabilitation $4,663R01PA 01 Major Rehabilitation $301,147

Port Angeles

William R. Fairchild International

2013

A01PO 02 Preventive Maintenance $10,761A02PO 03 Preventive Maintenance $12,440A03PO 03 Preventive Maintenance $1,324

AHLD08PO 01 Preventive Maintenance $26R08PO 01B Preventive Maintenance $240TFPO 01 Preventive Maintenance $37

2014

A02PO 02 Major Rehabilitation $507,213A03PO 02 Major Rehabilitation $10,978A04PO 01 Major Rehabilitation $282,403R08PO 01A Major Rehabilitation $857,311R13PO 01 Major Rehabilitation $445,548T02PO 01 Major Rehabilitation $11,629T03PO 01 Major Rehabilitation $76,474T04PO 01 Major Rehabilitation $64,978T06PO 01 Major Rehabilitation $389,909TCLPO 01 Major Rehabilitation $537,007TEPO 01 Major Rehabilitation $322,442TJPO 01 Major Rehabilitation $2,475,919TKPO 01 Major Rehabilitation $69,850

2015 TINDPO 01 Major Rehabilitation $100,078

Port Townsend

Jefferson County International

2013

A02PT 01 Preventive Maintenance $2,494A03PT 01 Preventive Maintenance $12R08PT 01 Preventive Maintenance $636T04PT 01 Preventive Maintenance $2,274T08PT 01 Preventive Maintenance $1,826

2018 R08PT 01 Major Rehabilitation $356,395

Prosser Prosser 2013 A01PR 01 Preventive Maintenance $24802 Preventive Maintenance $47




Associated City



Cost2

Prosser Prosser 2013

A02PR 01 Preventive Maintenance $74602 Preventive Maintenance $46303 Preventive Maintenance $474

A03PR 01 Preventive Maintenance $31704 Preventive Maintenance $55

A04PR 01 Preventive Maintenance $3,818R07PR 01 Preventive Maintenance $528T01PR 01 Preventive Maintenance $71T02PR 01 Preventive Maintenance $1,559

2017 A01PR 01 Major Rehabilitation $28,139

Pullman Pullman-Moscow Regional

2013

A01PM 01 Preventive Maintenance $17,614A02PM 02 Preventive Maintenance $854

T01PM 01 Preventive Maintenance $5,82002 Preventive Maintenance $8,060

T02PM 01 Preventive Maintenance $672014 A02PM 01 Major Rehabilitation $151,0932015 T03PM 01 Major Rehabilitation $27,1062016 T01PM 02 Major Rehabilitation $682,5042017 T01PM 01 Major Rehabilitation $301,7612018 T02PM 01 Major Rehabilitation $25,796

Puyallup Pierce County -Thun Field

2013

A01TH 02 Preventive Maintenance $31,792A02TH 01 Preventive Maintenance $21,895AH1TH 01 Preventive Maintenance $175T01TH 01 Preventive Maintenance $9,695T02TH 02 Preventive Maintenance $3,636

T03TH 01 Preventive Maintenance $70002 Preventive Maintenance $475

2014 R16TH 01 Major Rehabilitation $307,286

Quillayute Quillayute 2013

A01QU 01 Preventive Maintenance $588,542

R04QU 01 Preventive Maintenance $442,885

T01QU 01 Preventive Maintenance $54,885



Quincy Quincy Municipal 2013

A01QC 02 Preventive Maintenance $579

R09QC 01 Preventive Maintenance $5,750

T01QC 01 Preventive Maintenance $322

2014 A01QC 01 Major Rehabilitation $127,228




Associated City



Cost2

Quincy Quincy Municipal 2014

A01QC 02 Surface Treatment - Fog Seal $2,971

R09QC 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $181,045

T01QC 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $74,348

Renton Renton Municipal

2013

R16RN 03B Preventive Maintenance $15,278

TBRN 04 Preventive Maintenance $23

TDRN 02 Preventive Maintenance $85

TFRN 02 Preventive Maintenance $48

THRN 02 Preventive Maintenance $30

TKRN 02 Preventive Maintenance $8,526

TLRN 02 Preventive Maintenance $30

TVLRN 01 Preventive Maintenance $23,307

2014

ABRN 01 Major Rehabilitation $234,749

ACUSTRN 01 Major Rehabilitation $39,031

TARN 04 Major Rehabilitation $13,108

TBRN


TEASTRN 01 Major Rehabilitation $1,220,1992015 TNRN 02 Major Rehabilitation $13,489

2019 TARN

02 Major Rehabilitation $61,20005 Major Rehabilitation $72,614

TVLRN 01 Major Rehabilitation $797,1902020 TKRN 02 Major Rehabilitation $32,785

Republic Ferry County

2013 A01RE

01 Preventive Maintenance $7,31402 Preventive Maintenance $3,275

T01RE 01 Preventive Maintenance $190

2014 A01RE 03 Major Rehabilitation $30,253R17RE 01 Major Rehabilitation $1,010,603

2016 A01RE 02 Major Rehabilitation $9,4542020 A01RE 01 Major Rehabilitation $2,727

Richland Richland 2013

A01RI 01 Preventive Maintenance $360

A02RI

01 Preventive Maintenance $11304 Preventive Maintenance $8906 Preventive Maintenance $1,93107 Preventive Maintenance $10,322

A03RI 03 Preventive Maintenance $47




Associated City



Cost2

Richland Richland

2013

A04RI 01 Preventive Maintenance $402 Preventive Maintenance $1,00104 Preventive Maintenance $369

T01RI 01 Preventive Maintenance $541TA2RI 02 Preventive Maintenance $62TA3RI 02 Preventive Maintenance $42TA4RI 02 Preventive Maintenance $21TA5RI 02 Preventive Maintenance $63TARI 02 Preventive Maintenance $55

TBRI 01 Preventive Maintenance $2,27203 Preventive Maintenance $18

TCRI 02 Preventive Maintenance $12TDRI 01 Preventive Maintenance $27

2014 A02RI 08 Major Rehabilitation $9,861A03RI 02 Major Rehabilitation $10,695

2015 A02RI 05 Major Rehabilitation $41,8342016 A02RI 07 Major Rehabilitation $150,9632017 TDRI 01 Major Rehabilitation $63,3922019 A02RI 06 Major Rehabilitation $13,825

Ritzville Pru Field

2013

A01RZ 01 Preventive Maintenance $5,716

T01RZ 01 Preventive Maintenance $2,03402 Preventive Maintenance $451

T02RZ 01 Preventive Maintenance $1002014 R01RZ 01 Major Rehabilitation $230,8602016 A01RZ 01 Major Rehabilitation $99,5902020 T01RZ 02 Major Rehabilitation $37,925

Sekiu Sekiu 2014

A01SI 01 Major Rehabilitation $69,157A02SI 01 Major Rehabilitation $37,238A03SI 02 Major Rehabilitation $131,213

R08SI 01 Major Rehabilitation $400,04502 Major Rehabilitation $959,683

2015 A03SI 01 Major Rehabilitation $11,97003 Major Rehabilitation $29,859

Sequim Sequim Valley

2013 R09SE 01 Preventive Maintenance $136

2014

A01SE 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $4,599

A02SE 01 Major Rehabilitation $320,61102 Major Rehabilitation $227,27403 Major Rehabilitation $38,635




Associated City



Cost2

Sequim Sequim Valley 2014

A03SE 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $5,367R09SE 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $163,590T01SE 01 Major Rehabilitation $126,092

2019 R09SE 01 Major Rehabilitation $227,300

Shelton Sanderson Field

2013

A01SH 01 Preventive Maintenance $388,218

A02SH 01 Preventive Maintenance $1,92402 Preventive Maintenance $94

T01SH 01 Preventive Maintenance $1,045T02SH 01 Preventive Maintenance $20T03SH 01 Preventive Maintenance $439T07SH 01 Preventive Maintenance $115T09SH 01 Preventive Maintenance $467T11SH 01 Preventive Maintenance $20,651TA1SH 02 Preventive Maintenance $40TA4SH 01 Preventive Maintenance $90TASH 01 Preventive Maintenance $222

2014

A02SH 03 Major Rehabilitation $9,152T05SH 01 Major Rehabilitation $15,270T06SH 01 Major Rehabilitation $157,774T08SH 01 Major Rehabilitation $32,225T10SH 01 Major Rehabilitation $77,875TA1SH 01 Major Rehabilitation $131,208TA5SH 01 Major Rehabilitation $22,441

2016 T03SH 01 Major Rehabilitation $27,996T11SH 01 Major Rehabilitation $40,286

Silverdale APEX 2013 TASD 01 Preventive Maintenance $22,491

2014 R17SD 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $84,158TASD 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $58,800

Snohomish Harvey Field

2013 A02HF 01 Preventive Maintenance $3,002TBHF 01 Preventive Maintenance $2,961

2014

A01HF 01 Major Rehabilitation $57,178R15LHF 01 Major Rehabilitation $154,805

TAHF 01 Major Rehabilitation $374,97902 Major Rehabilitation $159,522

TH01HF 01 Major Rehabilitation $81,89402 Major Rehabilitation $136,57904 Major Rehabilitation $125,777

2020 TBHF 01 Major Rehabilitation $21,011




Associated City



Cost2

Spanaway Shady Acres 2016 R16SP 01 Surface Treatment - Fog Seal $7,338

Spokane Felts Field

2013

A01FL 06 Preventive Maintenance $6,355

A04FL 02 Preventive Maintenance $169



R03LFL

01A Preventive Maintenance $786,334

01B Preventive Maintenance $15,311

01C Preventive Maintenance $316,217

R03RFL 01 Preventive Maintenance $56

TAFL





TBFL 01 Preventive Maintenance $2,888

TDFL 01 Preventive Maintenance $21,292

2014

A01FL

02 Major Rehabilitation $1,803,150






09 Major Rehabilitation $1,240,684








A04FL 01 Major Rehabilitation $92,737



TBFL 02 Major Rehabilitation $139,786

TCFL 01 Major Rehabilitation $454,433

TDFL 02 Major Rehabilitation $197,293

2015 A01FL 17 Major Rehabilitation $25,531





Associated City



Cost2

Spokane Felts Field





2019 TAFL 01 Major Rehabilitation $297,797

2020 TBFL 01 Major Rehabilitation $106,908

TEFL 01 Major Rehabilitation $55,770

Spokane Mead Flying Service 2013

A01ME 01 Preventive Maintenance $40

A02ME 01 Preventive Maintenance $24

2014 R16ME 01 Major Rehabilitation $108,268

Stanwood Camano Island 2014

A01CI 01 Major Rehabilitation $7,887


R16CI 01 Major Rehabilitation $70,446

T01CI 01 Major Rehabilitation $42,558

Sunnyside Sunnyside Municipal

2013

A01SU 03 Preventive Maintenance $148


R07SU 01 Preventive Maintenance $5,53402 Preventive Maintenance $477

T03SU 01 Preventive Maintenance $1,195

2014 A01SU

01 Major Rehabilitation $181,27602 Major Rehabilitation $113,379

T02SU 01 Major Rehabilitation $70,973T03SU 02 Major Rehabilitation $7,383

2016 R07SU 01 Major Rehabilitation $279,5482017 R07SU 02 Major Rehabilitation $24,044

2019 A01SU 03 Major Rehabilitation $7,149T03SU 01 Major Rehabilitation $66,883

Tacoma Tacoma Narrows 2013 A01TN














Associated City



Cost2

Tacoma Tacoma Narrows

2013

A01TN 17 Preventive Maintenance $2,63419 Preventive Maintenance $322

AH35TN 01 Preventive Maintenance $189R17TN 01A Preventive Maintenance $4,527TA1TN 01 Preventive Maintenance $2,781TA2TN 01 Preventive Maintenance $523TA3TN 01 Preventive Maintenance $500

TATN 01 Preventive Maintenance $68902 Preventive Maintenance $2,198

2014

A01TN 07 Major Rehabilitation $11,72520 Major Rehabilitation $77,283

R17TN 01B Major Rehabilitation $277,97302A Major Rehabilitation $751,45402B Major Rehabilitation $375,727

2016 A01TN 19 Major Rehabilitation $50,522R17TN 01A Major Rehabilitation $583,541

2017 A01TN 12 Major Rehabilitation $433,7802019 A01TN 14 Major Rehabilitation $198,140

Tekoa Willard Field

2013 R04TE 01 Preventive Maintenance $769T01TE 01 Preventive Maintenance $28

2014 A01TE 01 Major Rehabilitation $25,608

HP01TE 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $1,656T01TE 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $4,659

2016 R04TE 01 Major Rehabilitation $86,99602 Major Rehabilitation $222,462

2017 HP01TE 01 Major Rehabilitation $2,4202020 T01TE 01 Major Rehabilitation $7,329

Toledo Ed Carlson Memorial-South Lewis County

2013 T02TO 02 Preventive Maintenance $41

2014

T01TO 01 Major Rehabilitation $1,119,761T02TO 01 Major Rehabilitation $1,149,785T03TO 01 Major Rehabilitation $74,423T04TO 01 Major Rehabilitation $126,428

Tonasket Tonasket Municipal

2013 T01TK 01 Preventive Maintenance $39

2014

A01TK 01 Major Rehabilitation $453,34902 Major Rehabilitation $54,465

R15TK 01 Major Rehabilitation $318,399T01TK 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $102,098T02TK 01 Major Rehabilitation $210,880




Associated City



Cost2

Tonasket Tonasket Municipal 2014 T06TK 01 Major Rehabilitation $96,3882018 A02TK 01 Major Rehabilitation $2,325

Twisp Twisp Municipal

2013 A03TW 01 Preventive Maintenance $102T03TW 01 Preventive Maintenance $98

2014

A01TW 01 Major Rehabilitation $68,056

A02TW 01 Major Rehabilitation $29,97602 Major Rehabilitation $59,595

T01TW 01 Major Rehabilitation $395,071T02TW 01 Major Rehabilitation $26,114

2015 A03TW 02 Surface Treatment - Fog Seal $2,0502017 A03TW 01 Major Rehabilitation $11,493

2019 R10TW 01 Surface Treatment - Fog Seal $33,271T03TW 01 Major Rehabilitation $9,581

Vancouver Pearson Field

2013 A02PE

01 Preventive Maintenance $5,49802 Preventive Maintenance $5,94703 Preventive Maintenance $77

T01PE 02 Preventive Maintenance $67T10PE 01 Preventive Maintenance $58,431

2014

A01PE 03 Major Rehabilitation $41,033A02PE 04 Major Rehabilitation $39,898

T03PE 01 Major Rehabilitation $93,83403 Major Rehabilitation $8,760

T05PE 01 Major Rehabilitation $26,903T11PE 02 Major Rehabilitation $13,802T14PE 02 Major Rehabilitation $105,494

2015 R08PE 01 Major Rehabilitation $299,1112018 T10PE 01 Major Rehabilitation $71,3032019 A02PE 03 Major Rehabilitation $77,858

Walla Walla

Walla Walla Regional

2013

AGAWW 01 Preventive Maintenance $941,17205 Preventive Maintenance $584,521

ATERMWW 01 Preventive Maintenance $953TAWW 05 Preventive Maintenance $217

TBWW 01 Preventive Maintenance $2702 Preventive Maintenance $319

2014 AGAWW

02 Major Rehabilitation $4,472,96803 Major Rehabilitation $876,870

R07WW 01 Major Rehabilitation $10,888,70002 Major Rehabilitation $10,888,700




Associated City



Cost2

Walla Walla


2014

R07WW 03 Major Rehabilitation $10,888,700

R16WW 01 Major Rehabilitation $14,383,63502 Major Rehabilitation $14,383,63503 Major Rehabilitation $14,383,635

TAWW 01 Major Rehabilitation $155,84104 Major Rehabilitation $1,005,75707 Major Rehabilitation $556,619

TCWW 01 Major Rehabilitation $2,725,310TDWW 02 Major Rehabilitation $41,692TEWW 02 Major Rehabilitation $83,059TGWW 01 Major Rehabilitation $3,153,332

2015 TAWW 06 Major Rehabilitation $111,742TCWW 05 Major Rehabilitation $40,166

2017 TBWW 02 Major Rehabilitation $39,8342019 TAWW 05 Major Rehabilitation $268,464

Warden Warden

2013 A01WA 01 Preventive Maintenance $2,219R17WA 02 Preventive Maintenance $68

2014 A01WA 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $27,885R17WA 01 Major Rehabilitation $329,016

2015 R17WA 02 Surface Treatment - Fog Seal $8,591

Waterville Waterville

2013

A02WV 01 Preventive Maintenance $829A03WV 01 Preventive Maintenance $1,603R07WV 01 Preventive Maintenance $13,273T01WV 01 Preventive Maintenance $27T02WV 01 Preventive Maintenance $4,711T03WV 01 Preventive Maintenance $270

2014

A01WV 01 Major Rehabilitation $91,452A02WV 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $36,169A03WV 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $4,407R07WV 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $155,029

2015 A02WV 02 Major Rehabilitation $19,283

2016 T02WV 01 Major Rehabilitation $27,700T03WV 01 Major Rehabilitation $9,060

2017 R07WV 01 Major Rehabilitation $226,456

2018 A03WV 01 Major Rehabilitation $6,599T01WV 01 Surface Treatment - Fog Seal $3,468

Wenatchee Pangborn Memorial 2013 A01WN 02 Preventive Maintenance $8,59905 Preventive Maintenance $879




Associated City



Cost2

Wenatchee Pangborn Memorial

2013

A01WN 08 Preventive Maintenance $286A02WN 03 Preventive Maintenance $947A03WN 02 Preventive Maintenance $59,839

ATERMWN 02 Preventive Maintenance $8

R12WN 01A Preventive Maintenance $67902B Preventive Maintenance $107

TA3WN 01 Preventive Maintenance $11202 Preventive Maintenance $6

TAWN 06 Preventive Maintenance $2

TCWN 01 Preventive Maintenance $1502 Preventive Maintenance $131

TGWN 01 Preventive Maintenance $30

THWN 03 Preventive Maintenance $405 Preventive Maintenance $83

2014

A01WN 01 Major Rehabilitation $346,02803 Major Rehabilitation $1,445,378

A02WN 02 Major Rehabilitation $1,308,830A03WN 01 Major Rehabilitation $99,564R12WN 01B Major Rehabilitation $730,355

TAWN


TCWN 03 Major Rehabilitation $54,246

TFWN 02 Major Rehabilitation $25,79203 Major Rehabilitation $108,09704 Major Rehabilitation $161,598

TGWN 04 Major Rehabilitation $73,878

2015

A01WN 06 Major Rehabilitation $156,938

ATERMWN 01 Major Rehabilitation $207,113

TAWN 03 Major Rehabilitation $104,926

2016

A01WN




TA3WN 01 Major Rehabilitation $70,275

TCWN 01 Major Rehabilitation $64,977

2017 A01WN 05 Major Rehabilitation $139,536

2018 TGWN 01 Major Rehabilitation $21,488




Associated City



Cost2

Wenatchee Pangborn Memorial 2018 THWN 05 Major Rehabilitation $55,346

2019 ATERMWN 02 Major Rehabilitation $44,648

R12WN 01A Major Rehabilitation $1,661,120

Westport Westport

2013 A02WE 01 Preventive Maintenance $1,501T01WE 01 Preventive Maintenance $10,773

2014 A01WE 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $93,480A02WE 01 Surface Treatment - Slurry Seal $5,709R12WE 01 Major Rehabilitation $161,438

2018 A02WE 01 Major Rehabilitation $7,740

Wilbur Wilbur Municipal

2013 A01WL 01 Preventive Maintenance $9,153A03WL 02 Preventive Maintenance $257

2014 A02WL 01 Major Rehabilitation $63,5222017 A01WL 01 Major Rehabilitation $32,1352018 A03WL 02 Major Rehabilitation $12,617

Wilson Creek Wilson Creek 2014

A01WC 01 Major Rehabilitation $366,860R10WC 01 Major Rehabilitation $193,085

Winthrop Methow Valley State

2013

A04MV 01 Preventive Maintenance $1,06202 Preventive Maintenance $5,559

T01MV 01 Preventive Maintenance $828T04MV 01 Preventive Maintenance $297

T05MV 02 Preventive Maintenance $1,30003 Preventive Maintenance $3,530

2014

A04MV 03 Major Rehabilitation $12,613A05MV 01 Major Rehabilitation $39,431T02MV 01 Major Rehabilitation $40,332T03MV 01 Major Rehabilitation $50,347T05MV 01 Major Rehabilitation $267,442

2015 A03MV 01 Major Rehabilitation $167,890R13MV 01 Major Rehabilitation $802,435

2019 A04MV 02 Major Rehabilitation $77,540T04MV 01 Major Rehabilitation $18,598

Woodland Woodland State 2020 R32WO 01 Major Rehabilitation $18,697

1Major Rehabilitation (pavement reconstruction, or overlay). 2Cost estimates are based on statewide numbers and should be adjusted to reflect local costs.



Table 6. Constrained budget scenario results1.

Date Global Funded

Major Rehabilitation

Funded Total Allocated Total Unfunded

1/1/2014 $799,810 $3,669,237 $4,469,046 $175,421,834 1/1/2015 $798,541 $3,699,265 $4,497,806 $185,144,929 1/1/2016 $799,915 $3,697,358 $4,497,273 $196,392,844 1/1/2017 $799,460 $3,699,897 $4,499,358 $208,852,649 1/1/2018 $660,382 $3,833,194 $4,493,575 $222,147,979 1/1/2019 $73,757 $4,425,217 $4,498,974 $238,192,104 1/1/2020 $21,260 $4,472,328 $4,493,588 $256,574,776

1This table presents the results of constrained budget analysis for only the pavements at non-primary airports that are eligible for funding.



PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM UPDATE REQUIREMENTS System Upkeep Guidelines

The following is a list of APMS components that, in general, require periodic update.

1. PAVER™ Software. WSDOT Aviation should maintain a current subscription with its PAVER™ distribution center. PAVER™ subscriptions must be renewed annually. WSDOT Aviation currently has a subscription that will expire in April 2014.

2. Inventory Data. It is important that the PAVER™ inventory database be updated to

reflect changes to the pavement network (e.g., the addition of new pavement areas or the rehabilitation or maintenance of existing pavement areas). WSDOT Aviation should keep a record of local, state, and federal pavement-related work that is completed at the airports. This record should identify the project location, type of work undertaken, and the completion date of the work. During the next update to the WSDOT Aviation APMS, this record should be provided to the selected consultant to enter into the PAVER™ database using methods prescribed by WSDOT Aviation and the FAA.

3. Condition Data. PCI data should be current and reflect existing pavement conditions.

For NPIAS airports to remain in compliance, the PCI data must be updated at least every 3 years. Therefore, it is recommended that the airports in the WSDOT Aviation APMS be evaluated again in summer 2015.

4. APMS Maps. The network definition and PCI maps should be revised to reflect new

information during the next APMS update. 5. Pavement Performance Models. The pavement performance models developed using

PAVER™ should be updated whenever new PCI data become available. This should be part of the next APMS update project.

6. Unit Cost Data. Unit cost data for M&R activities should be updated during the next

APMS update project.

7. Maintenance Policies. Maintenance policies should be reviewed during the next APMS update to determine whether maintenance strategies reflect actual practices.

Training Courses

It is important to obtain the education and training necessary to effectively use the APMS. WSDOT Aviation received training on the use of PAVER™ release 6.5.5 in June 2013. A full training course should be part of the next APMS update.



SUMMARY APTech, with assistance from CH2MHILL and CivilTech, recently updated the APMS for WSDOT Aviation. The principal objective for the APMS is to assess the relative condition of pavements for selected Washington airports in the WSASP and the FAA NPIAS. This report presents the results of this update to the WSDOT Aviation APMS. Following is a summary of the findings of this study:

The overall pavement area of the 100 airports included in the WSDOT Aviation APMS database is 149,833,807 square feet. If BFI, GEG, PSC, SEA, and YKM are excluded from the analysis, the area is 102,307,739 square feet.

The 2012 condition of the entire APMS system (totaling 100 airports) was an area-

weighted PCI of 77, and the pavement system averaged 24.9 years of age at the time of inspection. If BFI, GEG, PSC, SEA, and YKM are excluded from the analysis, the area-weighted 2012 PCI was 75, and the area-weighted age at the time of last inspection was 26.6 years.

The overall condition of the pavement system has decreased since the previous

project update. During 2005, ninety-six airports were evaluated, and the area-weighted PCI at that time for those airports was 77. In 2012, ninety-five airports were evaluated, and the area-weighted PCI was 75.

If no funding is provided for pavement M&R, the pavement system (excluding BFI,

GEG, PSC, SEA, and YKM) will experience a slow but steady decline in condition, with an anticipated PCI of 65 by 2020.

If all M&R projects were to be funded at the airports (excluding BFI, GEG, PSC,

SEA, and YKM), an approximate total of just over $338 million would be needed over the next 8 years. This can be further broken down into a need of $107.5 million for primary airports, $204.2 million for non-primary NPIAS airports, and $26.5 million for non-NPIAS airports.

APPENDIX A

INVENTORY SUMMARY

W

ashington Statew

ide Airport P

avement M

anagement R

eport June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-1

Table A-1. Pavement inventory summary

Associated City Airport Name Branch Section Section Rank

Surface Type

Surface Area (sf) LCD

Anacortes Anacortes

A01AN

01 P AAC 111,593 9/1/1996

02 P AAC 57,647 9/1/2001

03 P AC 16,009 6/3/2008

04 P PCC 2,000 6/2/2008

05 P AAC 37,461 9/1/1996

AHLD18AN 01 P AAC 6,914 9/1/1996

AHLD36AN 01 P AAC 5,800 9/1/1996

R18AN 01 P AAC 180,671 9/1/2003

TAAN 01 P AAC 124,504 9/1/1996

TH01AN

01 P AAC 37,999 9/1/1996

02 P AC 100,789 6/1/2008

03 P AC 42,392 6/3/2009

04 P AC 66,051 6/1/2005


A01AR 01 P AC 25,283 9/2/1997

A02AR 01 P AC 15,032 9/2/1997

A03AR 01 P AC 19,142 9/2/1997

A04AR 01 P AC 14,165 9/1/1999

A05AR 01 P AC 21,250 9/1/1999

AAIRAR 01 P AC 33,854 9/2/1989

ABAYAR

01 P AC 80,069 9/1/2001

03 P AAC 21,221 9/1/1993

04 P AC 24,405 9/2/1992

AHP1AR 01 P AC 23,918 6/3/2009

AMNDAR 01 P AC 146,311 9/2/1943

APMMAR 01 P AC 17,212 9/2/1991

Table A-1. Pavement inventory summary (continued)

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-2


Surface Type



AR1AR 01 P APC 24,716 9/1/1993

02 P PCC 524,898 9/2/1943

AR2AR 01 P AC 96,577 9/3/1990

AR3AR 01 P AC 36,074 6/3/2009

R11AR 01 P AAC 291,122 9/1/1991

R16AR 01 P AAC 533,300 9/1/1994

T02AR 01 P AC 199,205 9/2/1943

T03AR 01 P AC 21,899 9/1/1999

TA4AR 01 P AAC 83,410 9/1/1994

TAAR 01 P AAC 353,038 9/1/1993

02 P AAC 68,139 9/1/1994

TB2AR 01 P AC 21,558 9/1/2003

TBAR

01 P AC 120,338 9/2/1991

02 P AC 25,078 9/2/2001

03 P AC 80,734 6/3/2005

TBAYAR 01 P AC 21,263 9/1/2001

TC1AR 01 P AAC 4,187 6/1/2009

02 P AAC 3,687 9/1/1991

TC2AR 02 P AAC 4,223 9/1/1991

TC3AR 02 P AAC 4,223 9/1/1991

TC4AR 02 P AAC 3,493 9/1/1991

TCAR 01 P AAC 155,474 6/1/2009

TD2AR 01 P AC 22,517 6/3/2009

TDAR 01 P AAC 142,819 6/1/2009

TFAR 01 P AC 239,020 6/3/2005

THGRAR 01 P AC 34,710 9/2/1994


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-3


Surface Type



THGRAR

02 P AC 14,923 9/2/1988

03 P AC 30,784 9/2/1996

05 P AC 12,000 6/1/2011

06 P AC 19,500 6/2/2011

07 P AC 40,081 9/1/2002

08 P AC 14,994 9/2/1993

09 P AC 7,761 9/2/1988

10 P AC 21,367 9/2/1990

11 P AC 18,044 9/2/1975

12 P AC 13,311 9/2/1994

13 P AC 13,484 9/1/2000

14 P AC 8,016 6/2/2011

16 P AC 6,500 9/1/2000

05A P AC 18,000 9/2/1989

TPMMAR

01 P AAC 28,365 9/1/1990

02 P AC 7,736 9/2/1989

04 P AC 9,656 9/2/1989

05 P AC 6,476 9/2/1999

TR2AR 01 P AC 13,005 9/3/1990

02 P AC 6,650 9/1/2003


A01AU 01 P AC 164,504 9/3/1982

A02AU 01 P AC 370,255 9/3/1972

A03AU 02 P AC 113,274 9/2/1989

03 P AC 80,500 9/3/1986

A04AU 01 P AC 8,407 9/3/1986

A05AU 01 P AC 7,821 9/2/1969


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-4


Surface Type



A06AU 01 P AC 13,602 6/3/2009

A07AU 01 P AC 12,957 6/3/2009

R16AU 01 P AAC 37,500 9/1/2004

02 P AAC 214,500 9/1/2004

T08AU 01 P AC 99,080 9/3/1999

TAAU

01 P AC 13,331 9/3/1986

02 P AC 11,743 9/2/1969

03 P AC 105,521 6/3/2009

TBAU 01 P AC 28,620 9/3/1986

02 P AC 60,855 9/2/1969

TGAU 01 P AC 20,039 9/2/1969


A01BL 01 P AC 119,675 6/3/2003

AGABL

01 P AAC 254,010 6/1/1991

02 P AC 128,915 6/3/1997

03 P AAC 19,633 6/1/1991

04 P AAC 204,477 6/1/1991

05 P AC 12,011 6/2/1978

AHLD16BL 01 P AAC 28,991 6/3/2010

AHLD34BL 01 P AAC 142,531 12/1/1995

ATERMBL

01 P PCC 72,643 3/21/2010

02 P PCC 68,456 10/4/2012

03 P PCC 61,539 12/1/1998

04 P AC 126,497 6/4/2008

R34BL

01C P AAC 87,500 8/4/2010

01W P AAC 175,000 8/4/2010

02C P APC 249,968 8/4/2010


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-5


Surface Type



R34BL 02W P APC 499,935 6/4/2010

TABL 01 P AC 555,195 12/1/1998

TBBL 01 P AC 32,981 6/5/2010

TCBL 01 P AAC 35,063 6/4/2010

TDBL 01 P APC 36,090 6/4/2010

02 P AAC 15,693 12/1/2000

TEBL

01 P AAC 45,172 6/4/2010

02 P AC 29,395 6/4/2008

01 P AAC 47,727 6/4/2010

TFBL

02 P APC 28,477 12/1/1992

03 P AC 17,120 12/1/1992

04 P AC 12,024 8/4/2005

05 P AAC 15,529 12/1/1992

TGBL 01 P AC 20,460 6/5/2010

THANGBL

01 P AAC 72,798 6/1/1991

02 P AAC 62,436 6/1/1991

03 P AAC 32,111 6/1/1991

04 P AC 20,130 6/2/1990

05 P AC 17,525 12/1/1990

THBL 01 P AAC 58,234 6/4/2010


A01BR 01 P AC 100,417 9/2/1995

A02BR

01 P AC 29,096 9/3/1990

02 P AC 43,891 9/3/1989

03 P AC 65,130 9/3/1976

04 P AC 100,731 9/2/1976

05 P AC 20,120 9/2/1971


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-6


Surface Type



A03BR

01 P AC 9,932 9/2/1970

02 P AC 44,798 9/2/1978

03 P AC 130,599 9/2/1968

04 P AC 46,682 9/2/1976

05 P AC 138,150 9/2/1981

A04BR 01 P AC 41,300 9/2/1943

02 P AAC 2,114 9/1/1978

A05BR 01 P AC 77,323 9/1/2004

AFUELBR 01 P AC 15,326 9/3/1996

AH1BR 01 P AC 17,350 9/2/1994

AH2BR 01 P AC 22,000 9/2/1994

AH3BR 01 P AC 29,446 6/4/2006

R01BR

01A P AAC 90,000 5/1/2010

01B P AAC 45,000 5/1/2010

02A P AAC 261,500 5/1/2010

02B P AAC 130,750 5/1/2010

03A P AAC 151,500 5/1/2010

03B P AAC 75,750 5/1/2010

04A P AC 67,700 6/4/2006

04B P AC 33,850 6/4/2006

05A P AAC 31,000 5/1/2010

05B P AAC 15,500 5/1/2010

T01BR

01 P AC 66,382 9/3/1980

02 P AAC 34,809 9/1/1991

03 P AC 30,137 9/2/1991

04 P AC 9,885 9/2/1991


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-7


Surface Type



T01BR 05 P AC 36,000 9/3/1981

T02BR 01 P AAC 28,732 6/1/2009

TABR

01 P AC 21,807 9/2/1994

02 P AC 82,588 9/2/1977

03 P AC 89,480 9/2/1978

04 P AAC 10,712 9/1/1978

05 P AC 16,000 9/2/1978

06 P AC 37,962 6/4/2006

TBBR 01 P AC 10,787 9/2/1994

02 P AAC 5,537 5/1/2010

TCBR 01 P AC 8,887 9/2/1978

02 P AAC 4,687 5/1/2010

TDBR 01 P AC 12,987 9/2/1978

02 P AAC 8,500 5/1/2010

TEBR 01 P AAC 22,548 9/1/1976

02 P AAC 7,168 5/1/2010

TFBR

01 P AC 11,653 9/3/1980

02 P AC 4,630 9/2/1977

03 P AC 10,760 9/2/1977

04 P AAC 3,606 5/1/2010

TGBR 01 P AC 7,043 9/2/1977

02 P AAC 6,549 5/1/2010

TJBR 01 P AC 18,243 9/2/1994

Brewster Anderson Field

A01BW 01 P AC 92,379 8/3/2005

A02BW 01 P PCC 3,114 9/1/1934

R07BW 01 P AC 239,993 8/4/2005


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-8


Surface Type


Brewster Anderson Field

T01BW 01 P AC 14,647 8/3/2005

T03BW 01 P AC 5,144 9/2/1987

T04BW 01 P AC 14,649 8/3/2005


A01SK 01 P AC 67,110 5/15/1992

A02SK 01 P AAC 230,874 6/15/1991

A03SK 01 P AC 53,232 10/4/1999

A04SK 01 P AC 55,855 9/3/2003

A05SK 01 P AC 26,000 8/3/2004

02 P AC 14,993 8/3/2005

AASK

01 P AAC 61,333 6/15/1991

02 P AC 90,133 6/15/1991

03 P AC 25,757 5/15/1992

ADSK 01 P AC 38,807 9/3/1990

02 P AC 51,625 6/15/1991

AESK 01 P AC 20,880 5/15/1992

02 P PCC 5,880 6/2/2005

AH1SK 01 P AC 28,878 6/15/1991

AH2SK 01 P AC 42,475 9/3/2012

R04SK

01 P AC 138,674 9/3/1942

02 P AC 41,731 9/3/1942

03 P AC 60,000 9/3/1942

R10SK 01 P AAC 548,950 9/1/2011

T02SK 01 P AC 31,525 9/1/2003

T03SK 01 P AC 25,223 6/15/1991

T04SK 01 P AC 21,137 6/15/1991

02 P AC 17,176 6/4/1942


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-9


Surface Type



T05SK 01 P AC 33,185 8/4/1993

T06SK 01 P AC 107,234 5/15/1992

T07SK 01 P AC 43,275 8/3/2008

TASK

01 P AAC 223,519 3/15/1990

02 P AC 31,313 9/3/2012

03 P AC 46,381 9/3/2012

TCSK 01 P AC 28,267 9/3/2012

TDSK 01 P AC 28,216 9/3/2012

TESK

01 P AC 26,250 10/3/1999

02 P AC 29,649 10/3/1999

03 P AC 50,033 9/1/2003

04 P AC 31,798 8/3/2012

05 P AC 4,929 8/3/2012

06 P AC 4,658 8/3/2012

07 P AC 10,500 8/3/2012

08 P AAC 31,236 9/3/2012

TFSK 01 P AC 283,614 9/3/1942

02 P AAC 12,130 8/24/2012

Camas Grove Field

R07CA 01 P AC 110,266 9/3/1990

T01CA

01 P AC 3,452 10/2/2012

02 P AC 62,970 8/2/1997

03 P AC 4,168 9/2/1990

T02CA 01 P AC 42,126 10/2/2012

T03CA

01 P AC 32,138 9/2/1992

03 P AC 10,920 9/2/1997

04 P AC 13,573 7/1/2005


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-10


Surface Type


Camas Grove Field T03CA 05 P AC 18,256 8/2/2009

Cashmere Cashmere-Dryden

A01CD 01 P AC 5,483 6/3/2008

R07CD 01 P AC 90,250 9/1/2001

T01CD 01 P AC 57,235 6/3/2008

T02CD 01 P AAC 22,227 9/1/1988

Chehalis Chehalis - Centralia

A02CS 01 P AC 4,340 9/1/1960

AACS 01 P PCC 4,176 9/1/1985

ABCS 01 P PCC 4,400 9/1/1985

ABCS 02 P AC 1,964 1/1/1985

ACCS 01 P PCC 2,312 9/1/1960

ADCS 01 P PCC 18,377 9/1/1960

02 P AC 5,223 9/1/1985

AFBOCS 01 P AC 47,473 9/3/1952

APRNCS

01 P AC 11,835 9/3/1993

02 P AC 91,548 9/3/1982

03 P AC 16,735 6/3/2006

04 P AC 40,490 1/1/2007

R16CS 01A P PCC 450,000 9/2/1942

01B P PCC 250,000 9/2/1942

T01CS 01 P AC 15,754 9/3/1982

02 P AC 44,505 6/2/2006

T02CS 01 P AC 20,821 9/3/1982

T03CS 01 P AC 21,483 9/3/1982

T04CS 01 P AC 11,076 9/3/1981

T05CS 01 P AC 49,940 6/1/2005

T06CS 01 P AC 56,626 6/2/2006


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-11


Surface Type


Chehalis Chehalis - Centralia

TA2CS 01 P AC 14,896 9/3/1982

TA3CS 01 P AC 52,456 9/4/1997

TA4CS 01 P PCC 39,241 9/2/1942

TA5CS 01 P PCC 7,561 9/2/1942

TACS 01 P PCC 219,941 9/2/1942

TCLCS 01 P PCC 69,773 9/2/1942

Chelan Lake Chelan

A01CN 01 P AC 6,663 6/16/1986

A02CN 01 P AC 27,448 7/2/1987

03 P AC 3,900 9/1/1987

A03CN 01 P AC 104,951 6/17/1986

A04CN 01 P AC 6,743 6/16/1986

R02CN 01 P AC 210,600 6/16/1986

T01CN 01 P AC 36,953 9/2/1997

T02CN 01 P AC 21,384 7/2/1987

02 P AC 59,771 9/2/1997

T03CN 01 P AC 30,338 9/2/1997

T04CN 01 P AC 26,554 6/6/2004

Chewelah Sand Canyon

A01CH 01 P AAC 60,000 9/1/1995

A02CH 01 P AC 4,000 9/2/1974

R17CH 01 P AAC 163,035 10/1/1999

T01CH 01 P AC 109,379 6/2/1976

T02CH 01 P AAC 1,710 9/1/1999

T03CH 01 P AAC 1,890 9/1/1999

T04CH 01 P AC 2,878 10/2/1999

T05CH 01 P AC 1,710 9/1/2001

Cle Elum Cle Elum Municipal R07CL 01 P AC 142,740 6/3/2008


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-12


Surface Type


Cle Elum Cle Elum Municipal

T01CL 01 P AC 8,920 6/3/2008

T02CL 01 P AC 12,886 6/3/2008

T03CL 01 P AC 14,530 6/3/2008

Cle Elum Devere Field A01DV 01 P AC 6,750 9/2/1976

R08DV 01 P AC 52,520 9/2/1976

Colfax Port Of Whitman Business Air Center

A01CF 01 P AC 4,859 6/4/2007

02 P AC 3,417 6/4/2007

A02CF 01 P AC 6,387 6/4/2007

R07CF

01 P AAC 26,500 9/1/2001

02 P AAC 109,250 9/1/2004

03 P AAC 25,000 9/1/2004

T01CF 01 P AC 107,384 6/4/2007

T02CF 01 P AC 7,069 6/4/2007

T03CF 01 P AAC 2,985 9/1/2004

T04CF 01 P AC 20,575 9/4/2007

T05CF 01 P AAC 13,967 9/1/2004


A01CP

01 P PCC 2,432 6/2/1980

02 P PCC 2,473 6/1/1998

03 P PCC 1,600 6/1/1960

R05CP 01 P AC 82,165 6/1/2002

02 P AC 150,006 6/1/1960

T01CP

01 P AC 228,502 6/1/1960

02 P AC 4,225 6/1/2004

03 P AC 7,432 6/1/2006

Colville Colville Municipal A01CO 01 P AC 7,676 9/2/1993

02 P AC 8,785 9/2/1985


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-13


Surface Type



A02CO 01 P AC 5,920 9/2/1972

A03CO 01 P AC 4,266 9/2/1985

A03CO 02 P AC 3,519 6/2/1999

A04CO 01 P AC 53,055 6/2/2000

02 P PCC 1,675 9/2/2000

R01CO 01 P AC 124,667 6/3/1999

T01CO 01 P AC 6,636 6/3/1999

02 P AC 10,160 9/2/2000

T02CO

01 P AAC 9,309 9/1/1993

02 P AAC 14,200 8/1/1988

03 P AAC 8,800 8/1/1988

T03CO 01 P AC 3,682 6/3/1999

T05CO 01 P AC 49,718 6/2/2000

Concrete Mears Field (Concrete)

A01CC 01 P AAC 4,593 9/1/1993

A02CC 01 P AAC 12,000 9/1/1993

A03CC 01 P PCC 1,600 9/1/1997

A04CC 01 P AAC 4,593 9/1/1993

R07CC 01 P AAC 6,800 6/1/1993

02 P AAC 154,800 9/1/1993

T01CC 01 P AAC 8,810 9/1/1993

Darrington Darrington Municipal

A01DR 01 P AC 42,900 9/2/1995

R10DR 01 P AC 99,600 9/2/1995

T01DR 01 P AC 58,273 9/2/1995

Deer Park Deer Park Municipal A01DP

01 P AC 179,410 8/1/2012

02 P AC 64,870 8/1/2012

03 P AC 51,720 6/2/2011


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-14


Surface Type



A01DP 04 P PCC 16,380 7/2/2011

A02DP 01 P AC 22,419 6/2/2007

A03DP 01 P AC 23,448 6/2/2007

R04DP 01 P AC 194,315 9/1/2000

R16DP 01 P AC 457,500 9/1/2001

TA1DP 01 P AC 31,500 9/3/1995

TA2DP 01 P AC 40,300 9/3/1995

TA3DP 01 P AC 18,470 9/2/1983

TA4DP 01 P AC 51,721 9/3/1995

TA5DP 01 P AC 14,526 9/2/1998

TA6DP 01 P AC 24,845 6/2/2007

TA7DP 01 P AC 5,000 6/2/2011

TADP 01 P AC 284,066 9/1/2001

TBDP 01 P AC 31,197 7/2/2000

TCDP

01 P AC 138,590 9/2/1987

02 P AC 19,297 9/1/2001

03 P AC 6,523 9/2/2000


A01OR

01 P AAC 18,677 9/1/1986

02 P AC 96,602 9/3/1986

03 P AC 54,860 10/3/2011

A02OR 01 P AC 5,301 9/3/1993

HP01OR 01 P PCC 1,600 6/1/2007

R16OR 01 P AAC 119,400 9/1/1986

02 P AC 54,600 9/3/1986

TA1OR 01 P AC 5,261 9/3/1994

TAOR 01 P AAC 67,237 9/1/1986


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-15


Surface Type


Eastsound Orcas Island TAOR 02 P AAC 35,712 9/1/1986

THANGOR 01 P AC 29,245 9/3/1990

Eatonville Swanson Field

A01EA 01 P AC 4,710 9/3/1997

A02EA 01 P AC 4,895 9/3/1997

R16EA 01 P AC 107,640 9/3/1997

Electric City Grand Coulee Dam

A01EC 01 P AC 63,103 8/1/2005

R03EC 01 P AC 315,000 8/1/2005

T01EC 01 P AC 8,910 8/1/2005

T02EC 01 P AC 11,613 8/1/2005

T03EC 01 P AC 11,622 8/1/2005

T04EC 01 P AC 14,818 6/3/2009


A01EL

01 P AC 29,967 6/4/2007

02 P PCC 356,306 9/2/1943

03 P AAC 234,879 9/1/1995

04 P AC 19,728 6/4/2007

06 P PCC 1,250 6/2/2007

R07EL

01A P AC 116,600 9/3/1943

01B P AC 58,307 9/3/1943

02A P AC 429,490 9/2/1942

02B P AC 214,743 9/2/1942

03 P AC 8,047 9/2/1942

R11EL

01A P AC 308,958 9/2/1942

01B P PCC 322,500 6/1/1997

02 P AC 10,738 9/2/1942

T01EL 01 P AC 65,476 6/4/2007

02 P AC 18,504 9/2/1942


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-16


Surface Type



T02EL 01 P PCC 7,500 9/1/1942

T06EL 01 P PCC 44,700 9/1/1997

TAEL

01 P AAC 127,073 9/1/2002

02 P AAC 21,972 9/1/2002

03 P AAC 60,550 9/1/1995

04 P AAC 99,141 9/1/2002

05 P AAC 51,149 9/1/2002

TCEL 01 P AAC 51,349 9/1/2002

TFEL 01 P AAC 106,894 9/1/2002

Elma Elma Municipal

A01EM 01 P AC 28,411 9/1/1960

R25EM 01 P AC 4,673 9/1/1985

02 P AAC 76,858 9/1/1985

T01EM 01 P AAC 6,651 6/1/1985


A01EP

01 P AC 225,341 9/3/1943

02 P AC 853,161 9/3/1943

03 P AC 41,173 9/3/1943

04 P PCC 20,800 9/2/1943

05 P PCC 20,800 9/2/1943

06 P AC 15,313 9/1/1987

07 P AC 203,583 9/3/1943

08 P AC 9,304 9/3/1943

AHLD03EP 01 P AC 21,734 6/4/2007

AHLD21EP 01 P AC 22,049 6/4/2007

R03EP 01 P AAC 153,750 6/1/2008

02 P AAC 258,750 6/1/2008

R04EP 01 P AC 517,500 9/3/1943


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-17


Surface Type



R11EP 01 P AC 227,638 9/2/2004

TA2EP 01 P AC 11,850 9/3/1995

02 P AC 1,800 6/5/2007

TAEP 01 P AC 34,274 6/4/2008

02 P AC 233,424 6/4/2007

TB1EP

01 P AC 2,913 6/4/2008

02 P AC 12,563 9/3/1943

03 P AAC 13,351 9/1/2004

TBEP

01 P AAC 16,817 9/1/2004

02 P AC 250,922 9/3/1943

03 P AC 14,741 9/3/2004

TCEP 01 P AC 79,352 9/3/1943


AARMYPF

01 P AC 67,232 8/1/2009

02 P PCC 202,325 9/2/1942

03 P AC 61,978 9/2/1989

04 P AC 162,639 9/2/1990

06 P AAC 65,133 1/1/1963

07 P APC 100,651 9/3/1990

08 P PCC 55,858 9/2/1942

ABTRPF 01 P AAC 66,833 6/1/1989

02 P AC 19,360 9/2/1959

ACENTPF

01 P AC 103,696 3/3/1984

02 P AC 22,000 3/3/1984

03 P AAC 310,726 5/18/1985

04 P AAC 37,979 5/18/1985

05 P AC 82,220 2/3/1965


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-18


Surface Type



ACHPF

01 P AC 48,500 9/3/1986

02 P AC 91,850 6/3/1972

03 P AC 197,703 11/17/1960

04 P AC 57,408 2/3/1965

05 P AC 65,347 9/17/1967

ACTPF 01 P AAC 224,888 6/1/1989

AEHPF 01 P AC 183,451 9/2/1988

AERPF 01 P AC 179,180 1/2/1986

AFLIGHTPF 01 P PCC 51,958 6/3/2006

AFUELPF 01 P PCC 3,600 9/2/1994

AH16LPF 01 P AC 5,261 5/3/1985

AH34RPF 01 P AAC 5,268 6/1/2009

AH34RPF 02 P AAC 5,268 6/1/2009

AHA4PF 01 P AAC 7,200 6/1/2009

AITRPF

01 P AAC 31,411 6/1/1989

02 P AAC 236,752 6/1/1989

03 P AAC 12,061 6/1/1989

04 P PCC 55,280 6/1/2005

05 P AC 134,147 6/1/2005

AMESSPF

01 P AC 24,256 2/3/1965

02 P APC 15,422 2/1/1965

03 P PCC 23,057 9/2/1942

ANFUELPF 01 P AC 25,425 9/2/1993

ANRPF

01 P AC 20,726 9/2/1979

02 P AC 9,508 9/2/1979

03 P AC 3,376 9/2/1979


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-19


Surface Type



ANRPF

04 P AC 49,050 9/2/1994

05 P AAC 49,667 9/1/1991

06 P AC 7,000 9/2/1980

07 P APC 6,343 6/1/1991

08 P AC 14,714 9/2/1985

09 P PCC 5,091 6/1/2005

10 P AC 4,195 9/2/1991

11 P AC 2,976 9/2/1994

12 P AC 4,375 9/2/1991

13 P PCC 2,787 9/2/1985

14 P APC 18,122 9/1/1991

15 P APC 22,500 9/1/1991

16 P APC 6,480 9/1/1991

AOTRPF

01 P AAC 153,657 3/1/1984

02 P AAC 5,340 6/1/1989

03 P AAC 25,816 9/2/2003

ASRPF 01 P AAC 14,386 6/1/1989

ATRPF 01 P AC 76,636 6/1/2004

AWASHEPF 01 P PCC 1,600 9/2/1988

AWRPF

01 P AC 267,348 9/2/1982

02 P PCC 48,567 9/2/1994

03 P AC 145,490 9/2/1996

04 P AC 240,960 6/2/1996

05 P AC 4,817 9/2/1996

06 P AAC 64,012 3/1/1984

07 P AAC 68,118 1/1/1956


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-20


Surface Type



R11PF 01 P AC 313,533 8/8/1995

R16LPF 01 P AC 225,000 1/3/1986

R16RPF

01A P AAC 30,000 6/2/1994

01B P AAC 15,000 6/2/1994

02A P PCC 76,125 6/3/2009

02B P PCC 76,125 6/3/2009

03A P AC 14,500 6/5/2009

03B P AC 7,250 6/5/2009

04A P AAC 590,000 6/1/2009

04B P AAC 230,100 6/1/2009

04D P AAC 64,900 6/1/2009

05A P AAC 40,000 6/1/2009

05B P AAC 15,600 6/1/2009

05D P AAC 4,400 6/1/2009

06A P AC 111,205 5/8/1996

06B P AC 37,049 5/8/1996

06D P AC 39,250 6/2/1996

07A P AC 43,124 6/2/2000

07B P AC 21,836 6/2/2000

TA1PF 01 P PCC 122,167 9/1/2000

TA2PF 01 P AAC 15,036 6/1/2009

02 P AAC 24,309 6/1/2009

TA3PF 01 P AC 65,109 8/3/2011

02 P AC 23,461 8/3/2010

TA4PF 01 P AAC 10,637 6/1/2009

02 P AAC 12,939 6/1/2009


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-21


Surface Type



TA5PF 01 P AAC 21,279 6/1/2009

02 P AAC 13,155 6/1/2009

TA6PF

01 P AAC 8,967 6/1/2009

02 P AAC 10,193 6/1/2009

03 P AAC 10,061 6/1/2009

04 P AAC 11,987 6/1/2009

05 P AAC 10,631 6/1/2009

06 P AAC 13,612 6/1/2009

07 P AAC 16,833 6/1/2009

TA7PF 01 P AAC 21,309 6/1/2009

02 P AAC 37,691 6/1/2009

TA8PF 01 P APC 32,300 6/1/2009

02 P APC 24,431 6/1/2009

TA9PF

01 P AAC 15,493 5/1/1996

02 P AAC 14,682 5/1/1996

03 P AAC 14,589 5/1/1996

04 P AAC 14,398 5/1/1996

05 P AC 2,183 7/2/1993

06 P AC 25,945 9/2/2000

TAAPF

01 P PCC 64,966 1/1/1967

02 P AAC 2,790 6/1/1994

03 P AAC 5,157 9/1/1994

TAPF

01 P AAC 34,546 6/1/2009

02 P AAC 106,940 6/1/2009

03 P AAC 53,508 6/1/2009

04 P AAC 9,607 6/1/2011


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-22


Surface Type



TAPF

05 P AAC 4,804 6/1/2011

06 P AAC 32,529 6/1/2011

07 P AAC 16,264 6/1/2011

08 P AAC 33,220 6/1/2011

09 P AAC 16,338 6/1/2011

10 P AAC 45,788 6/1/2011

11 P AAC 22,255 6/1/2011

12 P AAC 80,473 6/1/2009

13 P AAC 7,383 6/1/2009

14 P AAC 8,187 6/1/2009

15 P AAC 117,466 6/1/2009

16 P AAC 59,176 6/1/2009

21 P AC 98,661 6/2/2000

22 P AAC 16,150 6/1/2009

23 P AAC 32,225 6/1/2009

24 P AAC 25,255 6/1/2009

25 P AAC 20,000 6/1/2009

26 P AAC 7,054 6/1/2009

10A P AAC 7,954 6/1/2009

13A P AAC 7,955 6/1/2009

TBPF 01 P AAC 64,637 9/1/1991

03 P AAC 4,761 3/1/1984

TCPF

01 P AAC 60,853 6/1/1989

03 P AAC 5,084 6/1/1989

05 P AAC 7,000 6/1/1989

06 P AAC 10,682 9/1/1985


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-23


Surface Type



TD0PF

01 P AAC 13,450 6/1/1989

02 P AAC 8,903 6/1/1989

03 P AAC 12,262 6/1/1989

TD1PF 01 P AAC 11,600 6/1/1989

TD2PF 01 P AAC 6,432 6/1/1989

TD2PF 03 P AAC 6,115 6/1/1989

TD3PF 01 P AAC 5,415 6/1/1989

TD4PF 01 P AAC 5,460 6/1/1989

TD5PF 01 P AAC 16,743 9/1/1958

TDPF

01 P AAC 23,723 6/1/1989

02 P AAC 5,080 6/1/1989

03 P AAC 39,028 6/1/1989

04 P AC 6,600 6/2/1962

05 P AAC 28,490 5/1/1985

06 P AC 32,504 6/2/1962

07 P AAC 35,703 6/1/1989

TEPF 01 P AAC 158,027 6/1/1989

02 P AAC 15,619 3/1/1984

TF2PF 01 P AC 6,263 2/4/1991

TF4PF 01 P AAC 9,444 6/1/2009

TFPF

01 P AC 46,698 2/4/1991

02 P AC 44,765 2/4/1991

03 P AC 16,273 2/26/1995

04 P AC 14,892 2/26/1995

TG1PF 01 P AC 4,757 2/3/1985

TG2PF 01 P AC 5,925 2/3/1985


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-24


Surface Type



TG3PF 01 P AAC 11,647 6/1/2009

TG4PF 01 P AC 8,426 2/3/1985

TG5PF 01 P AC 5,925 2/3/1985

TG6PF 01 P AC 9,498 2/3/1985

TG6PF 02 P AC 8,852 2/3/1985

TGPF 01 P AC 50,026 2/3/1985

02 P AC 50,026 2/3/1985

THPF 01 P AAC 3,669 1/1/1956

02 P AAC 70,560 3/1/1984

TINTPF 01 P AAC 47,778 6/1/1989

TINTPF 02 P AAC 25,065 6/1/1989

TK1PF 01 P PCC 95,000 6/3/2006

TK7PF 01 P AC 72,186 6/3/2009

TKNPF 01 P PCC 146,644 9/3/2009

TW1PF 01 P AC 5,001 6/3/2004

TW1PF 02 P AAC 4,787 8/8/1995

TWPF 01 P AC 58,370 6/3/2004

Forks Forks Municipal

A01FO 01 P AC 38,343 9/4/1988

R04FO 01 P AC 180,000 9/4/1988

T01FO 01 P AC 106,142 9/4/1988


AFUELFH 01 P AC 3,489 9/3/1986

AIAFH 01 P AC 5,100 9/2/1982

02 P AC 17,425 9/2/1992

ARES1FH 01 P AC 24,824 9/2/1992

ARES2FH 01 P AC 78,000 9/3/1993

ATERMFH 01 P AC 246,924 9/3/1985


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-25


Surface Type



ATRANSFH 01 P AC 100,058 9/3/1985

AWASHFH 01 P AC 4,000 9/3/1985

R16FH 01 P AAC 255,000 9/1/2004

TAFH 01 P AC 170,523 4/3/2012

02 P AC 21,743 9/3/1985

TGFH 01 P AC 8,110 9/3/1985

THANG1FH

01 P AC 86,608 9/3/1985

02 P AC 25,709 9/3/1997

03 P PCC 6,375 9/2/1996

THANG2FH 01 P AC 5,819 6/3/2010

02 P PCC 4,355 9/2/1982

THANG3FH 01 P AC 109,596 9/3/1986

TIAFH 01 P AC 12,918 9/3/1986


A03GO 01 P AAC 27,401 7/2/1987

R07GO 01 P AAC 147,174 9/1/2004

T01GO 01 P AAC 41,011 9/1/2004

T02GO 01 P AC 4,627 9/2/1995

T03GO 01 P AC 33,891 8/1/2005

Greenwater Ranger Creek State R15RC 01 P AC 86,700 9/1/1986


A01HO 01 P AC 24,529 9/3/1990

A02HO 01 P AC 61,032 9/1/1950

02 P AC 6,600 9/1/1994

A03HO

01 P AAC 82,445 9/1/1992

02 P APC 12,310 9/1/1992

03 P AC 109,101 9/3/1992

04 P AAC 59,177 9/1/1992


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-26


Surface Type



R06HO

01A P APC 15,000 9/1/1990

01B P APC 7,500 9/1/1990

02A P AAC 470,058 9/1/1990

02B P AAC 235,029 9/1/1990

03A P APC 15,000 9/1/1990

03B P APC 7,500 9/1/1990

T01HO 01 P AAC 240,899 9/1/1990

02 P AC 28,280 9/2/1992

T02HO 01 P AC 6,043 9/1/1988

T03HO 01 P AC 6,070 9/1/1991

T04HO 01 P AC 5,443 9/1/1968

T05HO 01 P AC 3,642 9/1/1936

T06HO 01 P AC 3,103 9/1/1935

T07HO 01 P AC 3,643 9/1/1940

T08HO 01 P AC 2,983 9/1/1939

T09HO 01 P AAC 15,896 9/1/1990

T10HO 01 P AAC 15,896 9/1/1990

Ilwaco Port Of Ilwaco

A01IL 01 P AAC 4,095 8/1/2005

A02IL 01 P AAC 2,500 8/1/2005

R10IL 01 P AAC 103,500 8/2/2005

Ione Ione Municipal

A01IO 01 P AAC 12,674 9/1/2002

R15IO 01 P AAC 112,099 9/1/2002

02 P AAC 51,165 9/1/2002

T01IO 01 P AC 13,642 9/3/1970

T02IO 01 P AAC 2,651 9/1/2002

Kelso Southwest Washington Regional A01KL 01 P AAC 26,989 9/1/1989


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-27


Surface Type



A02KL

01 P AAC 51,400 9/1/2002

02 P AAC 31,325 9/1/2002

03 P AC 6,914 9/2/1983

04 P PCC 4,506 9/2/1983

05 P AAC 4,855 9/1/2010

06 P PCC 3,600 9/3/2002

A03KL 01 P AC 113,424 9/3/1995

R12KL 01 P AC 430,500 8/3/1983

02 P AC 9,000 8/2/1983

T01KL 01 P AC 11,083 8/2/1983

T02KL

01 P AAC 8,333 6/1/1989

02 P AAC 27,034 9/1/1989

03 P AAC 6,600 9/1/1989

T03KL 01 P AAC 3,947 9/1/1989

T04KL 01 P AC 6,086 8/3/1983

T05KL 01 P AC 11,953 9/2/1995

T06KL 01 P AAC 19,835 9/1/2002

02 P AC 38,608 9/4/2007

T07KL 01 P AC 9,326 9/3/1995

TAKL

01 P AC 143,016 8/3/1983

02 P AC 18,456 7/2/1975

03 P AC 31,126 8/3/1983

TBKL 02 P AC 8,318 8/3/1983

TCKL 01 P AC 6,573 8/3/1983

Kennewick Vista Field A01KW 01 P AAC 82,165 9/1/1999

02 P AAC 37,075 6/1/1999


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-28


Surface Type



A01KW 03 P AC 43,185 9/2/1994

AHLD20KW 01 P AC 9,160 9/2/1994

AHLD2KW 01 P AC 4,200 9/2/2002

R02KW 01 P AAC 348,200 9/2/1999

02 P AC 51,800 9/2/1993

T01KW

01 P AC 49,175 9/2/1993

02 P AAC 105,872 9/1/2002

03 P AC 24,282 9/2/1993

T02KW 01 P AC 4,223 9/2/1994

TA1KW 01 P AC 8,799 9/2/1994

02 P AC 7,673 9/2/1999

TAKW 01 P AAC 124,714 9/1/2002

Kent Crest Airpark

A01KE 01 P AAC 32,257 9/1/1982

R15KE 01 P AAC 147,015 9/1/1986

T01KE 01 P AAC 97,769 9/1/1986

T02KE 01 P AAC 58,741 9/1/1982

T03KE 01 P AAC 9,570 9/1/1982

Langley Whidbey Airpark R16LA 01 P AAC 71,711 7/1/2002

Lind Lind Municipal

A01LI 01 P AAC 62,939 6/1/2005

02 P AC 15,457 6/3/2006

R05LI 01 P AC 153,600 6/3/2006

T01LI 01 P AAC 18,500 8/1/2005

T02LI 01 P AC 3,675 6/3/2006

Lopez Lopez Island

A01LO 01 P AAC 88,470 9/1/2012

AH16LO 01 P AC 11,895 9/3/2012

R16LO 01 P AAC 175,800 9/1/2003


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-29


Surface Type


Lopez Lopez Island TALO 01 P AAC 97,024 9/1/2012

TH01LO 01 P AC 24,906 9/3/2003


A01LY 01 P AC 48,184 9/3/1996

A02LY 01 P AC 18,794 9/3/1997

02 P AC 6,243 9/3/1997

R07LY 01 P AAC 110,526 9/1/1989

T01LY 01 P AC 29,374 6/3/2000

T02LY 01 P AC 5,522 9/3/1996

T03LY 01 P AC 4,620 9/3/1997

T04LY 01 P APC 4,060 9/1/1997

Mansfield Mansfield

A01MA 01 P AC 30,000 8/2/1992

02 P AC 5,123 8/2/1996

A03MA 01 P AC 4,750 8/2/1996

A04MA 01 P AC 4,750 9/2/1996

R03MA 01 P AAC 118,220 6/15/1996

T01MA 01 P AC 5,379 9/2/1992

T02MA 01 P AC 4,502 8/2/1996

Mattawa Desert Aire

A01MT 01 P AAC 39,956 9/1/1995

R10MT 01 P AAC 131,976 9/1/1995

T01MT 01 P AC 116,483 6/2/2008

T02MT 01 P AC 105,207 6/1/2009

Monroe Firstair Field

A01MN 01 P AC 5,085 9/2/1974

A02MN 01 P AC 3,968 9/2/1974

A08MN 01 P AC 16,323 9/2/1974

R07MN 01 P AAC 52,635 9/1/1974

02 P AC 16,500 9/2/1974


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-30


Surface Type


Monroe Firstair Field T01MN

01 P AC 24,797 9/3/1997

02 P AC 13,306 9/2/1984

03 P AC 10,403 9/2/1981

04 P AC 12,743 9/2/1980

Morton Strom Field

A01MO 01 P AAC 10,434 8/1/1987

A02MO 01 P AAC 9,509 8/1/1987

A03MO 01 P PCC 238 9/1/1987

R07MO 01 P AAC 72,000 8/1/1987

T01MO 01 P AAC 7,238 8/1/1987

Moses Lake Grant County International

A01GC

01 P APC 430,299 9/2/1990

02 P PCC 333,048 9/2/1956

03 P PCC 32,397 9/1/1995

04 P AC 240,787 6/3/2012

05 P PCC 305,084 9/2/1956

06 P PCC 100,375 9/2/1956

07 P APC 248,322 6/1/1990

08 P PCC 224,379 9/2/1956

09 P PCC 347,499 9/2/1956

10 P AC 173,280 9/2/1997

ACOLUMBGC 01 P PCC 114,617 9/2/1956

AEASTGC

01 P PCC 1,502,205 9/2/1955

02 P PCC 89,964 9/1/2002

03 P PCC 53,601 9/2/1955

04 P AC 45,266 9/2/1955

AFUELGC 01 P PCC 2,545,615 9/2/1956

AHANGGC 01 P APC 88,490 6/2/2009


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-31


Surface Type



AHELIPADGC 01 P PCC 625 9/1/1997

AHLD4GC 01 P PCC 119,918 9/2/1958

AHOLD14LGC 01 P PCC 220,271 9/2/1958

AMGC 01 P AC 19,749 6/1/1999

02 P AC 92,190 6/1/1999

R14LGC

01C P PCC 150,472 9/2/1958

01W P PCC 451,603 9/2/1958

02C P PCC 49,972 9/2/1991

02OW P PCC 50,057 9/2/1991

02W P PCC 99,958 9/2/1991

03C P APC 400,045 9/1/2005

03W P APC 1,200,059 5/1/2005

04C P PCC 74,976 9/2/1991

04OW P PCC 39,970 9/2/1956

04W P PCC 184,934 9/2/1991

01 P PCC 235,392 9/2/1958

R18GC 01 P APC 250,275 9/2/1989

R22GC

01 P PCC 7,500 9/2/1958

05 P PCC 7,500 9/2/1958

02C P AC 215,929 9/3/2001

02W P AC 215,929 6/3/2001

03C P AAC 55,454 5/1/2005

03W P AAC 55,454 5/1/2005

04C P APC 210,564 9/1/2001

04W P APC 211,335 9/1/2001

R927GC 01 P PCC 309,004 6/1/1944


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-32


Surface Type



TA1GC 01 P PCC 22,837 9/2/1956

TA2GC 01 P PCC 19,750 9/2/1956

TA3GC 01 P PCC 19,750 9/2/1956

TAGC

01 P PCC 31,634 9/2/1956

02 P PCC 79,831 9/2/1956

03 P PCC 294,273 9/2/1956

TBGC 01 P PCC 200,452 9/2/1956

TCGC 01 P APC 313,333 9/2/1989

02 P PCC 22,791 9/2/1958

TCOMPASSGC 01 P PCC 88,633 9/2/1991

TDGC 01 P PCC 71,386 6/2/2007

02 P PCC 16,392 9/2/1958

TEGC

01 P PCC 115,779 9/2/1958

01 P PCC 27,541 6/1/1955

02 P PCC 80,067 6/1/1955

03 P PCC 41,045 6/1/1955

04 P PCC 16,000 6/1/1955

TG1GC 01 P PCC 25,815 9/2/1955

TG2GC 01 P PCC 26,075 9/2/1955

TGGC

01 P PCC 16,000 9/2/1955

02 P APC 620,459 9/1/1956

03 P PCC 40,588 9/2/1956

THGC 01 P APC 16,337 9/1/1956

02 P PCC 33,416 9/2/1956

TJ1GC 01 P AC 32,117 9/3/1998 TJ2GC 01 P AC 14,552 9/3/1998


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-33


Surface Type


Moses Lake Grant County International TJ3GC 01 P AC 14,549 9/3/1998

TJGC 01 P AC 235,123 9/3/1998

Moses Lake Moses Lake Municipal

A01ML 01 P AC 7,000 9/2/1989

02 P AC 18,600 9/2/1999

AHLD16ML 01 P AC 8,169 5/2/1995

AHLD34ML 01 P AC 8,001 9/2/1999

R16ML

01 P AAC 8,225 5/1/1995

02 P AAC 87,937 8/1/1984

03 P AAC 21,808 5/1/1995

T01ML

01 P AAC 43,334 9/1/1989

02 P AC 6,770 9/2/1999

03 P AC 11,818 9/2/1999

T02ML

01 P AAC 5,573 5/1/1995

02 P AAC 45,717 9/1/1989

03 P AAC 10,764 5/1/1995

Oak Harbor AJ Eisenberg

A01OH 01 P AC 20,659 9/1/1958

A02OH 01 P AC 16,766 9/1/1958

AHLD07OH 01 P AC 6,055 9/1/1958

AHLD25OH 01 P AC 5,795 9/1/1958

RW0725OH 01 P AC 85,076 9/1/1958

TAOH 01 P AC 7,925 9/1/1990

Ocean Shores Ocean Shores Municipal

A01OS 01 P AC 16,443 5/3/2008

A02OS 01 P AAC 96,648 9/1/1995

R15OS 01 P AC 134,156 9/2/1987

02 P AC 25,511 5/3/2008

T01OS 01 P AC 8,271 9/2/1987


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-34


Surface Type


Ocean Shores Ocean Shores Municipal T01OS 02 P AC 92,274 5/3/2008

03 P AC 3,309 9/2/1987


R02OD 01 P AAC 91,500 9/1/1998

02 P AAC 96,000 9/1/1998

T01OD 01 P AAC 5,249 9/1/1998

T02OD 01 P AAC 5,560 9/1/1998

T03OD 01 P AAC 6,370 9/1/1998

T04OD 01 P AC 95,754 9/2/2004

Okanogan Okanogan Legion A01OK 01 P AC 57,273 9/1/1987

R04OK 01 P AC 104,827 9/3/1993


A01OL 01 P AC 19,275 9/1/1937

ACOV1OL 01 P AC 41,564 9/2/1984

02 P AC 26,310 10/1/2005

AFISHOL 01 P AC 12,358 9/1/1960

AGOWOL

01 P AC 10,309 9/2/1996

03 P AC 8,820 9/2/1996

04 P AC 11,327 9/1/2005

05 P AC 30,735 9/3/2005

07 P AC 7,743 9/2/1996

AH35OL 01 P AC 20,006 9/3/1980

AHABCOL 01 P AC 50,332 9/3/1996

AHDEOL 01 P AC 24,391 9/3/1998

02 P AC 44,835 9/1/1950

AHFGHOL 01 P AC 48,807 9/3/1998

APEAOL 01 P AC 22,471 9/2/1943

AS8OL 01 P AC 5,044 9/1/1993


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-35


Surface Type



ASPOL 01 P AC 97,832 9/3/1996

ATERMOL 01 P AC 154,848 9/3/1979

ATRANSOL 01 P AC 235,192 9/2/1996

02 P AC 5,659 9/2/1943

R08OL

01A P AC 65,096 9/2/1943

01B P AC 33,765 9/3/1992

02A P AC 439,348 9/2/1943

R17OL

01A P AC 164,679 10/17/2007

01B P AC 82,340 10/17/2007

02A P AC 75,369 10/1/2005

02B P AC 37,515 10/1/2005

03A P AAC 66,272 10/18/2007

03B P AAC 33,134 10/18/2007

04A P AC 358,216 10/18/2008

04B P AC 154,557 10/18/2008

T03OL 01 P AAC 37,973 9/1/1996

TAOL 01 P AC 50,963 9/3/1979

02 P AAC 8,022 10/18/2007

TBOL

01 P AC 146,581 6/1/2005

02 P AAC 10,240 10/18/2007

03 P AAC 9,478 10/18/2007

04 P AC 61,699 6/1/2005

TCOL 01 P AC 92,315 9/2/1943

TCOVOL 01 P AC 8,060 9/2/1949

TDOL 01 P AC 14,185 9/3/1979

TEOL 01 P AC 147,243 10/15/2010


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-36


Surface Type



TEOL 02 P AC 107,288 10/15/2010

TFOL

01 P AC 116,878 9/3/1986

02 P AC 6,127 9/3/1986

03 P AC 36,446 9/3/1979

04 P AC 74,516 6/1/2005

05 P AC 7,468 10/15/2010

TGOL

01 P AC 30,513 10/18/2008

02 P AC 159,101 9/2/1943

03 P AC 24,157 10/18/2008

TH1OL 01 P AC 46,750 10/1/2005

THABCOL 01 P AC 9,349 9/2/1996

THAOL 01 P AC 6,260 9/2/1945

THBOL 01 P AC 6,260 9/2/1965

THCOL 01 P AC 6,260 9/2/1949

THFOL 01 P AC 28,583 9/1/1960

THGOL 01 P AC 30,448 9/1/1995

02 P AC 4,205 9/1/1989

THHOL 01 P AC 14,803 9/1/1999

THIOL 01 P AC 40,449 10/1/2005

TSOLOYOL 01 P AC 51,780 9/2/2005

TTERMOL 02 P AAC 32,076 9/1/1979

TWOL

01 P AC 10,674 9/2/1980

02 P AC 221,379 9/3/1992

03 P AC 35,825 9/2/1943

04 P AC 119,984 6/1/2005

Omak Omak Municipal A01OM 01 P AC 66,099 9/3/1997


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-37


Surface Type


Omak Omak Municipal

A02OM 01 P AAC 173,981 9/1/1991

A03OM 01 P AC 23,426 8/3/2011

R17OM

01A P AAC 331,774 9/1/1974

01B P AC 350,025 9/3/2002

02A P AC 9,094 8/3/2011

03A P AC 9,031 8/3/2011

T01OM

01 P AC 39,077 9/3/1997

02 P AAC 52,459 9/1/1991

03 P AC 68,551 9/3/1991

T02OM 01 P AC 34,486 8/3/2011

T05OM 01 P AC 10,724 9/3/2002

T06OM 01 P AC 10,402 9/3/2002

T07OM 01 P AC 29,420 8/3/2011

Oroville Dorothy Scott

A01OV 01 P AC 4,875 9/2/1991

02 P AAC 53,675 9/1/1992

A02OV 01 P PCC 11,250 6/2/2008

R15OV 01 P AAC 200,700 8/1/1998

T01OV 01 P AC 5,270 5/2/1985

02 P AAC 25,875 9/1/1992

T02OV 01 P AAC 4,000 9/1/1992

T03OV 01 P AAC 39,188 9/1/1992

02 P AC 3,975 5/2/1985


A01OT 01 P AC 6,780 9/2/1989

02 P AC 3,940 9/2/1990

A02OT 01 P AC 14,141 9/2/1989

A03OT 01 P PCC 2,500 9/2/1989


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-38


Surface Type



AHLD7OT 01 P AC 5,967 6/3/2006

R07OT 01 P AC 164,700 9/2/1976

TAOT

01 P AC 104,210 9/2/1976

02 P AC 8,954 6/3/2006

03 P AC 28,291 6/3/2006

Packwood Packwood A01PA 01 P AC 3,249 8/17/1985

R01PA 01 P AC 87,165 8/17/1985

Port Angeles William R. Fairchild International

A01PO

01 P AC 105,095 6/2/2007

02 P AC 96,042 9/2/1978

03 P PCC 2,000 9/2/1999

04 P AC 87,750 9/1/2000

05 P AC 19,717 9/1/2004

06 P AC 72,786 9/1/2010

A02PO 02 P AC 32,771 9/2/1942

03 P PCC 22,500 9/2/1942

A03PO

01 P AC 91,770 8/1/2005

02 P AC 4,200 9/2/1978

03 P AC 87,123 9/2/1978

A04PO 01 P AC 108,045 9/2/1965

AHLD08PO 01 P AAC 11,249 9/1/1980

R08PO

01A P AAC 328,000 9/1/1989

01B P AAC 164,000 9/1/1989

02A P AAC 307,000 9/1/1996

02B P AAC 153,500 9/1/1996

R13PO 01 P AAC 170,463 9/1/1978

T01PO 01 P AC 3,897 6/2/2007


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-39


Surface Type


Port Angeles William R. Fairchild International

T02PO 01 P AC 4,449 9/2/1978

T03PO 01 P AC 4,941 9/3/1987

T04PO 01 P AC 5,668 9/2/1970

T05PO 01 P AC 17,496 9/3/1942

T06PO 01 P AC 25,192 9/3/1942

TAPO

01 P AAC 146,296 9/1/1980

02 P AAC 9,728 6/1/2009

03 P AC 45,541 6/3/2009

04 P AAC 20,760 6/1/2009

05 P AAC 47,705 6/1/2009

TBPO 01 P AAC 2,343 6/1/2009

02 P AAC 5,687 6/1/2009

TCLPO 01 P AC 34,696 9/3/1942

TCPO 01 P AAC 2,687 6/1/2009

02 P AAC 5,687 6/1/2009

TDPO 01 P AAC 5,988 6/1/2009

02 P AAC 10,958 6/1/2009

TEPO 01 P AC 20,833 9/2/1942

02 P AAC 26,788 8/2/2009

TFPO 01 P AAC 13,573 9/1/1980

TGPO 01 P AAC 13,573 6/1/2009

THPO 01 P AAC 16,909 6/1/2009

TINDPO 01 P AC 37,355 9/3/1985

TJPO 01 P AC 159,969 9/2/1942

TKPO 01 P AC 4,513 9/2/1972

Port Townsend Jefferson County International A01PT 01 P AC 118,630 9/3/1990


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-40


Surface Type


Port Townsend Jefferson County International

A01PT 02 P AC 44,800 9/3/1997

A02PT 01 P AC 14,404 9/3/1996

A03PT 01 P AC 12,533 9/3/1990

A04PT 01 P AC 6,686 9/3/1990

R08PT 01 P AC 225,000 9/3/1990

T01PT 01 P AC 18,269 9/3/1996

T02PT 01 P AC 3,438 9/3/1996

T03PT 01 P AC 4,725 3/1/2012

T04PT 01 P AC 27,240 9/3/1995

T05PT 01 P AC 40,625 9/3/1999

T06PT 01 P AC 52,780 9/3/1996

T07PT 01 P AC 27,145 9/3/1990

T08PT 01 P AC 11,508 9/3/1992

T09PT 01 P AC 19,236 8/4/2012

T10PT 01 P AC 92,009 9/3/1990

T11PT 01 P AC 84,905 6/3/2006

Prosser Prosser

A01PR 01 P AC 13,560 9/2/1991

02 P AC 12,840 9/2/1995

A02PR

01 P AAC 41,870 9/1/1995

02 P AC 44,000 9/2/1995

03 P PCC 1,600 9/2/1995

A03PR

01 P AC 55,926 9/1/2003

02 P AC 46,038 6/3/2010

03 P AC 4,468 6/3/2010

04 P AC 15,400 1/1/2008

A04PR 01 P AC 179,296 9/1/2003


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-41


Surface Type


Prosser Prosser

A05PR 01 P AC 5,375 6/1/2010

R07PR 01 P AAC 143,179 9/1/1995

02 P AC 64,149 6/3/2010

T01PR 01 P AAC 5,070 9/1/1995

T02PR 01 P AAC 85,701 9/1/1995

02 P AC 38,490 6/3/2010

T03PR 01 P AAC 1,972 9/1/1995

T04PR 01 P AC 18,683 6/3/2010


A01PM 01 P AAC 93,134 9/1/2003

A02PM

01 P AC 58,963 6/3/1995

02 P AAC 120,521 9/1/2004

03 P AC 137,290 6/2/2005

04 P PCC 3,600 6/1/2010

A03PM 01 P AC 24,750 7/1/2006

02 P AC 20,250 7/1/2006

AHP23PM 01 P AC 6,662 1/1/1995

R05PM

01A P AAC 22,500 7/11/2012

01B P AAC 22,500 7/11/2012

02A P AAC 67,500 7/11/2012

02B P AAC 67,500 7/11/2012

03A P AAC 246,500 7/11/2012

03B P AAC 246,500 7/11/2012

T01PM 01 P AAC 109,352 1/1/1995

02 P AAC 253,509 1/1/1995

T02PM 01 P AAC 9,120 1/1/1995

T03PM 01 P AAC 10,320 1/1/1995


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-42


Surface Type


Puyallup Pierce County - Thun Field

A01TH 01 P AC 45,375 9/2/2002

02 P AC 154,872 9/3/1988

A02TH 01 P AC 155,751 9/2/1983

AH1TH 01 P AC 10,000 9/3/1988

AH2TH 01 P AC 24,678 6/4/2008

R16TH 01 P AC 214,136 9/3/1988

T01TH 01 P AC 135,585 9/3/1988

02 P AC 38,387 6/4/2008

T02TH 01 P AC 43,128 9/2/2002

02 P AC 20,399 9/2/1992

T03TH 01 P AC 23,205 9/2/1992

02 P AC 44,960 9/2/1990

Quillayute Quillayute

A01QU 01 P PCC 528,750 9/2/1943

R04QU 01 P PCC 421,250 9/3/1943

T01QU 01 P PCC 59,363 9/3/1943

T02QU 01 P PCC 157,739 9/2/1943

T03QU 01 P PCC 118,965 9/3/1943

Quincy Quincy Municipal

A01QC

01 P AC 29,823 9/2/1979

02 P AAC 17,050 9/1/2005

03 P AAC 6,900 9/1/2005

R09QC 01 P AAC 174,880 8/1/2004

T01QC 01 P AAC 71,816 8/1/2005


ABRN 01 P AC 89,813 9/2/1990

ACUSTRN 01 P AC 14,933 6/1/1986

ADUSTRN 01 P AC 19,338 1/1/2002

AH16RN 01 P AAC 4,789 9/1/2002


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-43


Surface Type



AH16RN 02 P AAC 5,253 9/1/2002

AH34RN 01 P AAC 6,722 9/1/2002

R16RN

01A P AAC 445,684 9/2/2009

01B P AAC 190,916 9/2/2009

02A P AAC 190,010 9/2/2009

02B P AAC 81,187 9/2/2009

03A P PCC 105,000 9/1/1955

03B P PCC 63,000 9/1/1955

TARN

01 P AAC 224,277 9/1/2002

02 P AAC 20,695 6/1/2002

03 P AAC 32,861 9/1/2002

04 P AAC 5,015 6/1/2002

05 P AAC 24,555 9/1/2002

TBRN

01 P AC 22,607 9/3/1980

02 P AC 2,474 9/2/1972

03 P AC 5,147 9/3/1989

04 P AC 18,045 9/3/1990

05 P AC 91,698 9/2/1990

06 P AC 13,375 9/2/1990

TDRN 01 P AAC 4,688 9/2/2009

02 P AAC 9,753 9/1/2002

TEASTRN 01 P AC 78,837 6/2/1980

02 P AAC 15,996 8/1/2009

TERN 01 P AAC 10,455 9/2/2009

02 P AAC 5,550 9/1/2002

TFRN 01 P AAC 4,298 9/2/2009


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-44


Surface Type



TFRN 02 P AAC 5,073 9/1/2002

TGRN 01 P AAC 8,702 9/2/2009

02 P AAC 9,006 9/1/2002

THANGRN 01 P AC 45,085 9/2/1998

THRN 01 P AAC 11,912 9/2/2009

02 P AAC 8,986 9/1/2002

TKRN 01 P AAC 9,106 9/2/2009

02 P AC 10,816 9/2/1989

TLRN 01 P AAC 15,269 9/2/2009

02 P AAC 5,576 9/1/2002

TMRN 01 P AAC 8,250 9/2/2009

TNRN 01 P AAC 13,625 9/2/2009

02 P AC 5,035 9/3/1980

TVLRN 01 P AC 269,574 9/2/1972

TWESTRN 01 P AC 21,840 6/2/2001

Republic Ferry County

A01RE

01 P PCC 1,600 9/2/1980

02 P AC 6,408 9/1/2001

03 P AC 3,150 9/1/2004

R17RE 01 P AAC 208,800 9/1/1987

T01RE 01 P AAC 8,970 9/1/1987

Richland Richland

A01RI 01 P AAC 119,361 9/1/2002

A02RI

01 P AAC 56,952 9/1/2002

02 P AAC 57,621 9/1/2002

04 P AAC 149,768 9/1/1992

05 P AAC 21,180 9/1/1992

06 P AC 6,341 5/3/1999


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-45


Surface Type


Richland Richland

A02RI

07 P AC 74,566 9/2/1990

08 P AAC 5,117 9/1/2002

09 P AC 25,934 6/3/2007

A03RI

01 P AAC 21,219 9/1/2002

02 P AC 5,550 9/1/1997

03 P AC 10,242 9/1/1997

A04RI

01 P AAC 16,849 5/1/1999

02 P AAC 140,710 5/1/1999

03 P AAC 34,201 5/1/1999

04 P AC 101,618 5/3/1999

R01RI 01 P AC 299,925 6/2/2008

R08RI

01 P AC 325,531 6/2/2009

02 P AC 30,895 6/2/2008

03 P AC 34,000 6/1/2010

T01RI 01 P AC 68,880 9/2/1990

02 P AC 28,198 10/2/2012

T02RI 01 P AC 20,311 8/1/2004

TA2RI 01 P AC 5,673 6/2/2008

02 P AC 6,398 6/1/2003

TA3RI 01 P AC 11,574 6/2/2008

02 P AC 10,566 6/1/2003

TA4RI 01 P AC 5,673 6/2/2008

02 P AC 6,398 6/1/2003

TA5RI 01 P AC 5,673 6/2/2008

02 P AC 6,173 6/1/2003

TARI 01 P AC 5,137 6/2/2008


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-46


Surface Type


Richland Richland

TARI

02 P AC 148,256 6/1/2003

03 P AC 5,137 6/2/2008

04 P AC 11,616 6/1/2010

05 P AC 16,298 6/1/2010

TB2RI 01 P AC 4,938 6/2/2009

TB2RI 02 P AC 4,498 10/2/2012

TB3RI 01 P AC 4,504 6/2/2009

02 P AC 5,573 10/2/2012

TBRI

01 P AC 43,399 9/2/1990

02 P AC 16,926 6/1/2008

03 P AC 18,595 6/1/2003

04 P AC 77,306 10/1/2012

05 P AC 11,799 6/2/2009

06 P AC 13,623 6/2/2009

TCRI 01 P AC 16,918 9/3/1977

02 P AC 11,587 9/2/1982

TDRI 01 P AC 30,548 9/2/1979

02 P AC 23,861 6/3/2007

Ritzville Pru Field

A01RZ 01 P AC 67,503 9/2/1998

R01RZ 01 P AAC 164,400 10/1/1999

T01RZ 01 P AAC 97,995 9/1/1999

02 P AAC 23,288 10/1/1999

T02RZ 01 P AC 6,183 10/1/1999

Rosalia Rosalia Municipal

A01RO 01 P AAC 57,371 6/1/2011

R02RO 01 P AC 112,000 6/3/2008

T01RO 01 P AAC 92,060 6/1/2008


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-47


Surface Type


Rosalia Rosalia Municipal T02RO 01 P AAC 5,596 6/1/2008

Sekiu Sekiu

A01SI 01 P AC 9,750 9/2/1979

A02SI 01 P AC 5,250 9/2/1972

A03SI

01 P AC 8,138 9/2/1979

02 P AC 18,499 9/2/1972

03 P AAC 20,300 7/1/1987

R08SI 01 P AAC 56,400 7/1/1987

02 P AAC 135,300 7/1/1987

Sequim Sequim Valley

A01SE 01 P AAC 3,936 7/1/1997

A02SE

01 P AC 45,201 8/2/1985

02 P AC 32,042 8/2/1985

03 P AC 5,447 8/2/1985

A03SE 01 P AAC 4,593 7/1/1997

R09SE 01 P AAC 140,000 7/1/1997

T01SE 01 P AC 17,777 8/2/1985


A01SH 01 P PCC 300,500 7/2/1943

A02SH

01 P AC 6,608 9/3/1990

02 P AC 12,687 7/2/1943

03 P AC 4,675 9/2/1980

R05SH 01 P AAC 503,200 9/1/1992

T01SH 01 P AC 113,268 7/2/1943

T02SH 01 P AC 13,672 7/2/1943

T03SH 01 P AC 13,611 7/2/1943

T05SH 01 P AC 7,800 9/2/1979

T06SH 01 P AC 10,396 9/2/1979

T07SH 01 P AC 9,636 9/2/1995


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-48


Surface Type



T08SH 01 P AC 16,460 7/2/1943

T09SH 01 P AC 38,543 7/2/2003

T10SH 01 P AC 22,305 7/2/1943

T11SH 01 P AC 19,586 7/2/1943

TA1SH 01 P AC 67,020 7/2/1943

02 P AAC 83,821 9/1/1992

TA3SH 01 P AAC 16,399 9/1/1992

TA4SH 01 P AAC 26,537 9/1/1992

TA5SH 01 P AC 11,463 7/2/1943

02 P AAC 29,565 9/1/1992

TASH 01 P AAC 229,661 9/1/1992

TBSH 01 P AAC 66,485 9/1/1992

Silverdale Apex R17SD 01 P AC 72,022 6/1/1982

TASD 01 P AC 50,321 6/1/1985

Snohomish Harvey Field

A01HF 01 P AC 39,845 9/1/1985

A02HF 01 P AC 5,000 9/1/1985

R15LHF 01 P AC 97,152 9/1/1985

TAHF 01 P AC 52,866 9/1/1985

TAHF 02 P AC 22,490 9/1/1985

TBHF 01 P AC 12,626 9/1/1985

TH01HF

01 P AC 57,069 9/1/1985

02 P AC 95,177 9/1/1985

03 P AC 57,964 9/1/2000

04 P PCC 7,248 9/1/1985

South Bend Willapa Harbor A01WP 01 P AAC 40,260 10/1/2007

R11WP 01 P AAC 156,000 10/1/2005


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-49


Surface Type


South Bend Willapa Harbor T01WP 01 P AC 89,178 10/3/2007

Spanaway Shady Acres R16SP 01 P AC 37,857 8/2/1999

Spokane Felts Field

A01FL

01 P AC 6,750 9/1/1992

02 P AC 106,102 9/1/1973

03 P PCC 2,801 9/1/1941

04 P PCC 20,526 9/1/1941

05 P AC 9,865 9/1/1943

06 P AAC 34,305 9/1/1986

07 P AC 19,925 9/2/1968

08 P AC 11,452 9/2/1944

09 P AC 73,005 9/2/1969

10 P AAC 122,232 9/1/1984

11 P AC 46,105 9/2/1977

12 P AC 22,176 9/1/1965

13 P AC 19,602 9/1/1972

14 P AC 28,544 9/1/1966

15 P AC 35,925 9/2/1980

16 P AC 7,800 9/1/1993

17 P AC 12,926 9/1/1999

18 P AC 16,000 9/2/2007

A02FL 01 P AC 30,414 9/2/1989

A03FL 01 P AC 31,636 9/2/1999

A04FL 01 P AC 48,125 9/2/1995

02 P AC 44,993 9/1/2002

A05FL 01 P AC 16,761 9/1/1971

A06FL 01 P AC 21,567 9/1/1995


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-50


Surface Type


Spokane Felts Field

A07FL 01 P AC 6,406 9/1/1995

A08FL 01 P AC 7,044 9/2/1986

A09FL 01 P AC 19,756 9/2/2010

R03LFL

01A P PCC 224,808 9/1/1941

01B P PCC 224,808 9/1/2000

01C P PCC 224,808 9/1/1941

01 P AAC 199,503 9/1/1992

TAFL

01 P AAC 136,590 9/1/1992

02 P AC 52,197 9/2/1999

03 P AC 27,504 9/2/1995

04 P AC 38,694 9/1/1995

TBFL

01 P AC 47,839 9/2/1994

02 P AC 72,541 9/2/1987

03 P AC 66,296 9/2/2006

TCFL 01 P AAC 26,740 9/1/1960

TDFL 01 P PCC 11,937 9/1/1941

02 P AAC 31,560 9/1/1985

TEFL 01 P AAC 24,956 9/1/1992

Spokane Mead Flying Service

A01ME 01 P AAC 4,050 9/1/1979

A02ME 01 P AAC 3,600 9/1/1979

R16ME 01 P AAC 77,100 9/1/1979

Stanwood Camano Island

A01CI 01 P AAC 1,112 6/1/2005

02 P PCC 1,560 6/1/1980

R16CI 01 P AC 46,178 1/1/1980

T01CI 01 P AC 6,000 1/1/1980

Sunnyside Sunnyside Municipal A01SU 01 P AAC 129,091 9/1/1998


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-51


Surface Type



A01SU

02 P AC 80,740 9/2/1985

03 P AAC 4,500 9/1/1998

04 P AAC 5,375 9/1/1998

R07SU 01 P AAC 189,480 9/1/2003

02 P AAC 15,900 9/1/2003

T01SU 01 P AC 45,527 6/3/2009

T02SU 01 P AAC 19,840 9/1/1998

T03SU 01 P AC 42,097 9/2/1985

02 P AC 5,258 9/2/1975

Tacoma Tacoma Narrows A01TN

01 P AC 26,839 9/1/1998

02 P AC 176,954 9/3/1988

03 P AAC 75,080 9/1/1989

04 P AC 20,800 9/1/1998

05 P AC 77,120 9/2/1983

06 P AC 25,704 9/3/1993

07 P AC 4,486 9/2/1982

08 P AC 169,559 9/2/1992

09 P AC 32,263 9/1/1975

11 P AC 26,455 9/1/1965

12 P AC 154,111 9/3/1964

13 P AC 46,273 9/1/1990

14 P AC 67,002 9/1/1954

15 P AC 111,630 9/2/1985

16 P AC 35,145 9/1/1981

17 P AC 124,319 9/3/1982

19 P AC 18,398 9/1/1985


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-52


Surface Type



A01TN 20 P AC 29,568 9/1/1975

AH17TN 01 P AC 28,438 9/2/1992

AH35TN 01 P AC 28,956 9/2/1970

R17TN

01A P AC 212,500 9/3/1964

01B P AC 106,350 9/3/1964

02A P AC 287,500 9/3/1964

02B P AC 143,750 9/3/1964

TA1TN 01 P AC 21,825 9/3/1964

TA2TN 01 P AC 23,971 9/3/1964

TA3TN 01 P AC 26,025 9/2/1970

TA3TN 02 P AAC 7,208 9/1/1989

TA3TN 03 P AC 5,063 9/2/1989

TA4TN 01 P AC 37,082 9/2/1970

TATN 01 P AC 186,742 9/2/1970

02 P AC 190,463 9/3/1964

Tekoa Willard Field

A01TE 01 P AAC 18,236 10/1/1996

HP01TE 01 P AC 1,600 9/2/2001

R04TE 01 P AAC 58,980 9/1/2001

02 P AC 32,860 9/2/2001

T01TE 01 P AAC 4,500 10/1/1996

Toledo Ed Carlson Memorial - South Lewis

County

A01TO 01 P AC 69,508 6/1/2007

R05TO 01 P AAC 359,719 9/1/2004

02 P AC 359,719 9/1/2004

T01TO 01 P AC 74,928 9/2/1943

T02TO 01 P AC 76,937 7/2/1975

02 P AC 5,080 9/2/2003


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-53


Surface Type


Toledo Ed Carlson Memorial - South Lewis

County T03TO 01 P AC 4,980 9/2/1989

T04TO 01 P PCC 3,907 9/2/1995

Tonasket Tonasket Municipal

A01TK 01 P AC 47,203 9/2/1993

02 P AC 38,786 9/1/2002

A02TK 01 P PCC 1,500 9/2/1998

R15TK 01 P AC 152,122 9/2/1990

T01TK 01 P AAC 98,622 10/1/2005

T02TK 01 P AC 21,957 9/2/1993

T06TK 01 P AC 10,036 9/2/1993


A01TW 01 P AAC 7,086 9/1/1995

A02TW 01 P AC 21,347 9/2/1992

02 P AC 6,205 9/2/1995

A03TW 01 P AC 7,600 9/1/2002

02 P AC 11,480 9/2/2004

R10TW 01 P AAC 168,762 6/1/2010

T01TW 01 P AC 41,135 9/2/1995

T02TW 01 P AC 2,719 9/2/1992

T03TW 01 P AC 6,030 9/2/2003


A01PE 03 P AC 5,785 9/1/1939

A02PE

01 P AC 81,829 9/2/2002

02 P AC 36,386 6/2/1986

03 P AAC 47,955 8/10/1999

04 P AC 5,625 9/1/1986

A03PE 01 P AAC 26,565 9/1/2002

02 P AC 3,720 9/2/2002

A05PE 01 P AC 10,250 5/2/1985


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-54


Surface Type



A06PE 01 P AC 7,675 6/1/2002

A07PE 01 P AC 42,406 9/2/2002

R08PE 01 P AAC 203,356 9/1/1990

T01PE 01 P AAC 41,079 9/1/1990

02 P AC 81,273 5/2/1985

T03PE

01 P AC 13,229 9/1/1959

02 P AC 7,798 9/2/2002

03 P AC 6,104 9/2/2002

T05PE 01 P AC 7,297 9/1/1998

T06PE 01 P AC 31,081 9/2/2002

T07PE 01 P AC 27,571 8/11/1999

T09PE 01 P AC 16,334 6/1/2002

T10PE 01 P AC 45,015 6/2/1986

T11PE 02 P AC 9,618 9/1/1991

T12PE 01 P AC 9,618 9/1/1997

T14PE 01 P AC 4,345 9/1/1995

T14PE 02 P AC 14,873 9/1/1994

Walla Walla Walla Walla Regional

AGAWW

01 P PCC 390,169 9/2/1943

02 P APC 235,885 9/1/1993

03 P APC 342,193 9/1/1993

04 P APC 557,776 11/1/2012

05 P PCC 314,843 9/2/1943

06 P PCC 5,184 11/3/2012

ATERMWW 01 P PCC 118,898 9/3/2000

R02WW 01 P AC 357,928 9/2/2003

02 P AC 356,077 9/2/2003


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-55


Surface Type


Walla Walla Walla Walla Regional

R02WW 03 P AC 354,227 9/2/2003

R07WW

01 P PCC 244,547 9/2/1943

02 P PCC 244,547 9/2/1943

03 P PCC 244,547 9/2/1943

04 P AC 17,389 9/2/2003

05 P AC 17,389 9/2/2003

06 P AC 17,389 9/2/2003

R16WW

01 P PCC 323,039 9/2/1943

02 P PCC 323,039 9/2/1943

03 P PCC 323,039 9/2/1943

TAWW

01 P PCC 3,500 9/2/1943

02 P APC 10,127 9/1/2002

03 P APC 15,841 9/1/2003

04 P APC 392,490 9/1/1982

05 P APC 92,598 9/1/1996

06 P APC 42,543 9/1/1995

07 P PCC 12,501 9/2/1943

TBWW 01 P APC 12,149 9/1/1996

02 P APC 14,435 6/1/1982

TCWW

01 P APC 165,970 9/1/1982

02 P APC 10,841 9/1/1996

03 P APC 12,912 9/1/1996

04 P APC 5,623 9/1/1996

05 P APC 15,292 9/1/1982

TDWW 01 P APC 12,432 9/1/2003

02 P APC 16,270 9/1/1982


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-56


Surface Type


Walla Walla Walla Walla Regional TEWW

01 P APC 19,115 9/1/2003

02 P APC 32,413 9/1/1982

TGWW 01 P PCC 70,820 6/2/1943

Warden Warden

A01WA 01 P AC 26,936 9/2/2002

R17WA 01 P AC 112,000 9/2/1977

02 P AC 48,100 9/1/2002


A01WV 01 P AC 9,522 9/2/1976

A02WV 01 P AC 34,937 9/2/1997

02 P AC 13,397 9/3/1998

A03WV 01 P AC 4,257 9/3/1998

R07WV 01 P AAC 149,750 9/2/1997

T01WV 01 P AC 18,033 6/1/2009

T02WV 01 P AC 18,775 9/3/1997

T03WV 01 P AC 6,141 9/3/1998


A01WN

01 P AC 18,248 6/2/1984

02 P AC 29,900 6/1/2001

03 P AAC 76,223 6/1/1984

05 P AAC 50,565 6/1/2001

06 P AAC 59,750 6/1/1984

07 P AAC 296,518 6/1/2001

08 P AC 42,914 9/1/1999

09 P AC 11,802 9/1/1999

A02WN 02 P AC 69,022 9/1/1942

03 P PCC 1,200 9/1/1985

A03WN 01 P AC 28,875 6/2/1987

02 P PCC 4,906 9/1/1985


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-57


Surface Type



A04WN 02 P AC 28,413 9/1/1942

AHOLD30WN 01 P AC 37,145 6/3/2006

ATERMWN 01 P AC 78,853 6/3/1992

02 P AC 15,400 6/3/2001

R12WN

01A P AC 572,951 6/3/1999

01B P AC 285,016 6/3/1999

02A P AC 60,648 6/3/2006

02B P AC 30,000 6/3/2006

TA2WN 01 P AC 8,772 6/3/1999

TA3WN 01 P AC 26,103 6/1/1999

02 P AC 4,000 6/1/1999

TAWN

01 P AC 75,021 6/3/2006

02 P AC 72,779 6/2/1987

03 P AC 39,948 9/3/1999

04 P AC 160,792 6/3/2001

05 P AC 20,745 6/3/2001

06 P AC 9,117 6/3/1999

07 P AC 10,557 10/2/1942

TCWN

01 P AC 24,135 6/2/1978

02 P AC 20,378 1/1/1999

03 P AC 21,169 9/1/1978

TFWN

02 P AC 10,065 6/2/1993

03 P AC 42,184 9/1/1999

04 P AC 8,522 9/1/1978

TGWN 01 P AC 7,597 6/1/1999

02 P AC 80,162 6/2/1942


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-58


Surface Type



TGWN 03 P AC 61,324 6/1/1942

04 P AC 3,896 6/2/1978

THWN

01 P AC 8,991 6/1/1993

02 P AC 9,567 6/1/1996

03 P AC 9,286 6/1/1993

04 P AC 9,590 6/1/1992

05 P AC 19,567 9/2/1978

06 P AC 9,232 6/1/1998

Westport Westport A01WE

01 P AC 80,000 9/1/1993

01 P AC 4,886 9/1/1993

01 P AC 112,500 9/1/1993

01 P AC 24,359 9/1/1993


A01WL 01 P AC 21,250 9/1/2003

A02WL 01 P AC 6,614 1/1/1985

A03WL 01 P AC 15,315 6/2/2010

02 P PCC 8,140 6/1/1985

R02WL 01 P AAC 110,425 6/1/2009

02 P AC 120,575 6/3/2009

T01WL

01 P AC 38,680 6/2/2010

02 P AC 85,146 6/2/2010

03 P AAC 3,573 6/1/2009

T02WL 01 P AC 26,378 6/3/2009

Wilson Creek Wilson Creek A01WC 01 P AC 85,995 9/1/2003

R10WC 01 P AC 137,500 9/1/1997

Winthrop Methow Valley State A03MV 01 P AC 85,000 9/3/1996

A04MV 01 P AC 63,343 9/1/2003


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. A

-59


Surface Type



A04MV 02 P AC 35,565 9/1/2003

03 P AC 6,545 9/1/1955

A05MV 01 P AC 20,462 9/1/1996

R13MV 01 P AC 406,259 9/3/1996

T01MV 01 P AC 20,837 9/3/1996

T02MV

01 P AC 20,930 9/1/1996

01 P AC 7,051 9/3/1996

01 P AC 8,530 9/3/1996

01 P AC 15,737 9/1/1955

02 P AC 13,935 9/1/2002

03 P AC 11,410 1/1/2008

Woodland Woodland State R32WO 01 P AAC 11,235 9/1/2003

02 P AAC 51,750 9/1/2006


Applied Pavement Technology, Inc. A-60

Table A-2. Airport geographic region by associated city.

Associated City

Airport Name Geographic

Region1

Anacortes Anacortes WEST Arlington Arlington Municipal WEST Auburn Auburn Municipal WEST

Bellingham Bellingham International WEST Bremerton Bremerton National WEST Brewster Anderson Field NCNT

Burlington Skagit Regional WEST Camas Grove Field WEST

Cashmere Cashmere-Dryden NCNT Chehalis Chehalis-Centralia WEST Chelan Lake Chelan NCNT

Chewelah Sand Canyon EAST Cle Elum Cle Elum Municipal SCNT Cle Elum DeVere Field SCNT

Colfax Port of Whitman Business Air Center EAST College Place Martin Field SCNT

Colville Colville Municipal EAST Concrete Mears Field (Concrete) WEST

Darrington Darrington Municipal WEST Davenport Davenport Municipal NCNT Deer Park Deer Park Municipal EAST Eastsound Orcas Island WEST Eatonville Swanson Field WEST

Electric City Grand Coulee Dam NCNT Ellensburg Bowers Field SCNT

Elma Elma Municipal WEST Ephrata Ephrata Municipal SCNT Everett Snohomish County (Paine Field) WEST Forks Forks Municipal WEST

Friday Harbor Friday Harbor WEST Goldendale Goldendale Municipal WEST Greenwater Ranger Creek State WEST Hoquiam Bowerman Field CSTL Ilwaco Port of Ilwaco CSTL Ione Ione Municipal EAST

Kelso Southwest Washington Regional WEST


Table A-2. Airport geographic region by associated city (continued).


Associated City


Region1

Kennewick Vista Field SCNT Kent Crest Airpark WEST

Langley Whidbey Airpark WEST Lind Lind Municipal SCNT

Lopez Lopez Island WEST Lynden Lynden Municipal WEST

Mansfield Mansfield NCNT Mattawa Desert Aire SCNT Monroe Firstair Field WEST Morton Strom Field WEST

Moses Lake Grant County International SCNT Moses Lake Moses Lake Municipal SCNT Oak Harbor AJ Eisenberg WEST

Ocean Shores Ocean Shores Municipal CSTL Odessa Odessa Municipal SCNT

Okanogan Okanogan Legion NCNT Olympia Olympia Regional WEST

Omak Omak Municipal NCNT Oroville Dorothy Scott NCNT Othello Othello Municipal SCNT

Packwood Packwood WEST Port Angeles William R. Fairchild International WEST

Port Townsend Jefferson County International WEST Prosser Prosser SCNT Pullman Pullman-Moscow Regional EAST Puyallup Pierce County-Thun Field WEST

Quillayute Quillayute WEST Quincy Quincy Municipal SCNT Renton Renton Municipal WEST

Republic Ferry County NCNT Richland Richland SCNT Ritzville Pru Field SCNT Rosalia Rosalia Municipal EAST Sekiu Sekiu WEST

Sequim Sequim Valley WEST Shelton Sanderson Field WEST


Table A-2. Airport geographic region by associated city (continued).


Associated City


Region1

Silverdale APEX WEST Snohomish Harvey Field WEST South Bend Willapa Harbor CSTL Spanaway Shady Acres WEST Spokane Felts Field EAST Spokane Mead Flying Service EAST

Stanwood Camano Island WEST Sunnyside Sunnyside Municipal SCNT Tacoma Tacoma Narrows WEST Tekoa Willard Field EAST

Toledo Ed Carlson Memorial-South Lewis County WEST

Tonasket Tonasket Municipal NCNT Twisp Twisp Municipal NCNT

Vancouver Pearson Field WEST Walla Walla Walla Walla Regional SCNT

Warden Warden SCNT Waterville Waterville NCNT Wenatchee Pangborn Memorial NCNT Westport Westport CSTL Wilbur Wilbur Municipal NCNT

Wilson Creek Wilson Creek EAST Winthrop Methow Valley State NCNT Woodland Woodland State WEST

1Geographic Regions are defined as follows: EAST – Eastern, NCNT – North Central, SCNT – South Central, WEST – Western, CSTL - Coastal.

APPENDIX B

FAA AC 150/5380-6B

AdvisoryU.S. Department of Transportation CircularFederal Aviation Administration

Subject: GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES Date: September 28, 2007 AC No: 150/5380-6B FOR MAINTENANCE OF AIRPORT Initiated by: AAS-100 Change: PAVEMENTS

1. PURPOSE. This Advisory Circular (AC) provides guidelines and procedures for maintaining rigid and flexible airport pavements.

2. CANCELLATION. This AC cancels AC 150/5380-6A, Guidelines and Procedures for Maintenance of Airport Pavements, dated 7/14/03.

3. APPLICATION. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) recommends these guidelines for airport pavements, as appropriate.

4. PRINCIPAL CHANGES. The following principal changes are incorporated:

a. Added the distress types that were not originally included, as defined within American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) D 5340 Standard Test Method for Airport Pavement Condition Index Surveys.

b. Added Tables 6-2 through 6-10 to familiarize the user with each distress type and its recommended method(s) for repair/maintenance.

c. Added generic specifications for maintenance products to provide guidance in selection of materials and products regularly used for airfield pavement maintenance for use on Airport Improvement Program funded projects.

d. Added select generic typical details to provide guidance in the installation of materials and repair procedures.

5. RELATED READING MATERIAL. The publications in Appendix D, Bibliography, provide further guidance and technical information.

6. METRIC UNITS. To promote an orderly transition to metric units, the text and figures include both English and metric dimensions. The metric conversions are based on operational significance and may not be exact equivalents. Until there is an official changeover to the metric system, the English dimensions should be used.

7. COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS for improvements to this AC should be sent to:

Manager, Airport Engineering Division Federal Aviation Administration ATTN: AAS-100 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591

8. COPIES OF THIS AC. The Office of Airport Safety and Standards is in the process of making ACs available to the public through the Internet. These ACs may be accessed through the FAA home page (www.faa.gov). A printed copy of this AC and other ACs can be ordered from the U.S. Department of Transportation, Subsequent Distribution Office, Ardmore East Business Center, 3341 Q 75th Avenue, Landover, MD 20785.

David L. Bennett Director of Airport Safety and Standards

AC 150/5380-6B September 28, 2007

ii

September 28, 2007 AC 150/5380-6B

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION TO AIRPORT PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE............................ 11-1. PURPOSE OF ADVISORY CIRCULAR .......................................................................... 11-2. BACKGROUND OF ADVISORY CIRCULAR ............................................................... 1

CHAPTER 2. AIRPORT PAVEMENTS: COMPOSITION AND FUNCTION ................................. 32-1. INTRODUCTION TO AIRPORT PAVEMENTS............................................................. 32-2. CLASSIFICATION OF AIRFIELD PAVEMENTS.......................................................... 32-3. RIGID PAVEMENT COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE ............................................ 32-4. FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE..................................... 52-5. AIRPORT PAVEMENT OVERLAYS .............................................................................. 72-6. RECYCLED PAVEMENT STRUCTURES ...................................................................... 7

CHAPTER 3. PAVEMENT DISTRESS.................................................................................................. 93-1. GENERAL.......................................................................................................................... 93-2. TYPES OF PAVEMENT DISTRESS ................................................................................ 93-3. CONCRETE PAVEMENT DISTRESSES......................................................................... 93-4. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT DISTRESSES................................................................... 123-5. DRAINAGE OF AIRPORT PAVEMENTS .................................................................... 14

CHAPTER 4. GUIDELINES FOR INSPECTION OF PAVEMENTS .............................................. 174-1. INTRODUCTION TO PAVEMENT INSPECTION....................................................... 174-2. INSPECTION PROCEDURES ........................................................................................ 174-3. FRICTION SURVEYS..................................................................................................... 184-4. NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING..................................................................................... 184-5. DRAINAGE SURVEYS .................................................................................................. 184-6. PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS.................................................................... 194-7. PAVEMENT PERFORMANCE ...................................................................................... 194-8. PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.................................... 19

CHAPTER 5. MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT................................................................................ 215-1. GENERAL........................................................................................................................ 215-2. COMMON MATERIALS FOR MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR ................................ 215-3. EQUIPMENT USED FOR PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE .......................................... 23

CHAPTER 6. METHODS OF REPAIR................................................................................................ 276-1. GENERAL........................................................................................................................ 276-2. REPAIR METHODS FOR PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENTS......... 276-3. TEMPORARY PATCHING OF CONCRETE PAVEMENTS........................................ 296-4. REPAIR METHODS FOR BITUMINOUS CONCRETE PAVEMENTS ...................... 306-5. ADDITIONAL REPAIR METHODS .............................................................................. 31

APPENDIX A. PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM............................ 47

APPENDIX B. GENERIC SPECIFICATIONS .................................................................................. 49

APPENDIX C. GENERIC TYPICAL DETAILS ............................................................................... 79

APPENDIX D. BIBLIOGRAPHY ........................................................................................................ 99

iii

AC 150/5380-6B September 28, 2007

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 2 - 1. Typical Rigid Pavement Structure .......................................................................................... 3Figure 2 - 2. Transfer of Wheel Load to Foundation in Rigid Pavement Structure..................................... 4Figure 2 - 3. Formation of Ice Crystals in Frost-Susceptible Soil ............................................................... 4Figure 2 - 4. Typical Flexible Pavement Structure ...................................................................................... 5Figure 2 - 5. Distribution of Wheel Load in Flexible Pavement.................................................................. 6Figure C - 1.A. Existing Condition Random Crack in Rigid Pavement Detail ......................................... 80 Figure C - 1.B. Proposed Saw Cut and Seal Detail.................................................................................... 80Figure C - 2. Corner Break Repair Detail - Section................................................................................... 81Figure C - 3. Corner Break Repair Saw Cut Detail - Plan ......................................................................... 82Figure C - 4. Existing Condition Reseal/ Repair of Saw Cut Joint Detail ................................................. 83Figure C - 5. Joint Spall Repair at Existing Rigid Pavement Joint Detail ................................................. 84Figure C - 6. Spall Repair at Existing Rigid Pavement Isolation Joint Detail ........................................... 85Figure C - 7. Typical Popout Spall Repair Detail ...................................................................................... 86Figure C - 8. Full Depth Rigid Pavement Slab Repair Detail - Plan ......................................................... 87Figure C - 9. Full Depth Rigid Pavement Slab Repair Detail - Section..................................................... 88Figure C - 10. Saw Cut Contraction Joint Detail ....................................................................................... 89Figure C - 11. Saw Cut Detail Rigid Pavement/Rigid Pavement Interface Large Slab(s) Repairs............ 90Figure C - 12. Temporary Repairs of Rigid Pavements Using Flexible Pavement Detail......................... 91Figure C - 13. Saw and Seal Joint Detail Rigid/Flexible Pavement Interface ........................................... 92Figure C - 14. Crack Repair Detail – Cracks Less Than 1” Wide and Greater Than 1/8” Wide Using

Router ............................................................................................................................... 93Figure C - 15. Crack Repair With HMA Pavement Overlay 2” or Greater Detail .................................... 94Figure C - 16. Type 1 Crack Repair Detail – Hot Applied Sealant With Fibers........................................ 95Figure C - 17. Type 2A Crack Repair Detail – Cracks Greater Than 1” Wide in Pavements 5” or Greater

in Thickness ...................................................................................................................... 96Figure C - 18. Type 2B Crack Repair Detail – Cracks Greater Than 1” Wide in Pavements Less Than 5”

in Thickness ...................................................................................................................... 97Figure C - 19. Saw and Seal HMA Pavements Detail ‘A’......................................................................... 98

LIST OF TABLES

Table 6 - 1. QUICK GUIDE FOR MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF COMMON PAVEMENT SURFACE PROBLEMS .................................................................................................. 32

Table 6 - 2. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF RIGID PAVEMENT SURFACES – CRACKING ... 34Table 6 - 3. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF RIGID PAVEMENT SURFACES – JOINT SEAL

DAMAGE......................................................................................................................... 35Table 6 - 4. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF RIGID PAVEMENT SURFACES –

DISINTEGRATION......................................................................................................... 36Table 6 - 5. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF RIGID PAVEMENT SURFACES – DISTORTION 38Table 6 - 6. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF RIGID PAVEMENT SURFACES – LOSS OF SKID

RESISTANCE .................................................................................................................. 39Table 6 - 7. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT SURFACES – CRACKING

.......................................................................................................................................... 40

iv

September 28, 2007 AC 150/5380-6B

Table 6 - 8. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT SURFACES – DISINTEGRATION......................................................................................................... 42

Table 6 - 9. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT SURFACES –

Table 6 - 10. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT SURFACES – LOSS OF DISTORTION .................................................................................................................. 44

SKID RESISTANCE........................................................................................................ 45

v

AC 150/5380-6B September 28, 2007

Intentionally left blank.

vi

September 28, 2007 AC 150/5380-6B

CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION TO AIRPORT PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE.

1-1. PURPOSE OF ADVISORY CIRCULAR. Airport managers and technical/maintenance personnel responsible for the operation and maintenance of airports continually face problems with pavement distress and deterioration. This advisory circular (AC) provides information on the types of pavement distress that occur and recommends corrective actions to undertake during preventive and remedial maintenance. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) recommends that airports follow American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) D 5340, Standard Test Method for Airport Pavement Condition Index Surveys, when conducting preventive maintenance inspections. This standard employs the visual distress identification and rating system known as the Pavement Condition Index (PCI).

1-2. BACKGROUND OF ADVISORY CIRCULAR. The aviation community has a large investment in airport pavements. The major objective in the design and construction of these pavements is to provide adequate load-carrying capacity and good ride quality necessary for the safe operation of aircraft under all weather conditions. Immediately after completion, airport pavements begin a gradual deterioration that is attributable to several factors. Traffic loads in excess of those forecast during pavement design can shorten pavement life considerably. Normal distresses in the pavement structure result from surface weathering, fatigue effects, and differential movement in the underlying subbase over a period of years. In addition, faulty construction techniques, substandard materials, or poor

a. Many pavements were not designed for servicing today s aircraft, which impose loads

workmanship can accelerate the pavement deterioration process. Consequently, airport pavements require continual routine maintenance, rehabilitation, and upgrading.

'much greater than those initially considered. Also, the frequency of takeoffs and landings at many airports has increased considerably. Both factors result in accelerated deterioration of the pavement structure. To assure safe operations, airports must make special efforts to upgrade and maintain pavement serviceability.

b. The most effective means of preserving airport runways, taxiways, and apron pavement areas is to implement a comprehensive maintenance program. To be effective, such a program must take a coordinated, budgeted, and systematic approach to both preventive and remedial maintenance. Many airports using this approach have experienced tangible benefits. The comprehensive maintenance program should be updated annually and feature a schedule of inspections and a listing of required equipment and products. The airport should systematically make repairs and take preventive measures, when necessary, on an annual basis at a minimum. A systematic approach assures continual vigilance and permits the stockpiling of maintenance materials, which assures their availability for routine and emergency maintenance.

Airport Improvement Program grant conditions now require many airports to develop and maintain an effective airport pavement maintenance management program. The FAA, however, also encourages airports that are not specifically required to develop maintenance programs to do so as a means of preserving their facilities. An effective pavement maintenance program can take many forms but must include several basic items, see Appendix A.

c. Two major elements contribute to pavement deterioration: the effects of weathering and the action of aircraft traffic. Early detection and repair of pavement defects is the most important preventive maintenance procedure. Failure to perform routine maintenance during the early stages of deterioration may eventually result in serious pavement distresses that require extensive repairs that will be costly in terms of dollars and closure time. In all cases of pavement distress manifestations, the causes of the problem should first be determined. If the causes are known, an airport can select a repair method that will not only correct the present damage, but also prevent or retard its progression.

1

AC 150/5380-6B September 28, 2007

d. The selection of a specific rehabilitation method involves considering both economic and engineering impacts. Airports should prioritize long-term effects rather than focusing on immediate short-term remedies. They should compare the cost of rehabilitation alternatives over some finite period of time (life cycle) and consider the future economic consequences of a repair method as well as the initial rehabilitating maintenance costs.

e. The present or immediate costs of a pavement rehabilitation/maintenance project include actual costs of the repairs and the estimated costs that airport users will incur because of the project. Airport user costs include those experienced by airlines, fixed base operators, concession operators, and others due to traffic delays, re-routings, etc. Future costs include those incurred later in the life cycle (depending on the life expectancy of the repair) plus the routine maintenance costs expected over the same period. A comparative analysis of these costs for the various alternatives will suggest the most economical rehabilitation scheme.

2

September 28, 2007 AC 150/5380-6B

CHAPTER 2. AIRPORT PAVEMENTS: COMPOSITION AND FUNCTION.

2-1. INTRODUCTION TO AIRPORT PAVEMENTS. Airport pavements are designed, constructed, and maintained to support the critical loads imposed on them and to produce a smooth, skid-resistant, and safe-riding surface. The pavement must be of such quality and thickness to ensure it will not fail under the loads imposed and be durable enough to withstand the abrasive action of traffic, adverse weather conditions, and other deteriorating influences. To ensure the necessary strength of the pavement and to prevent unmanageable distresses from developing, the airport should consider various design, construction, and material-related parameters. This chapter helps airports assess these parameters by providing information on the composition of pavement sections and the functional aspects of flexible and rigid pavement components.

2-2. CLASSIFICATION OF AIRPORT PAVEMENTS. Generally, pavements fall into two classes: rigid and flexible pavements. For guidance and design standards refer to current version of AC 150/5320-6, Airport Pavement Design and Evaluation.

Combinations of different pavement types and stabilized layers form complex pavements that can be classified as variations of the normal rigid and flexible types. Overlay pavements—existing pavement structures that are overlaid by either of the pavement types—are also common.

2-3. RIGID PAVEMENT COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE. Rigid pavements normally use Portland cement concrete (PCC) as the prime structural element. Depending on conditions, engineers may design the PCC pavement slab with plain, lightly reinforced, continuously reinforced, prestressed, or fibrous concrete. The PCC pavement slab usually lies on a compacted granular or treated subbase, which is supported, in turn, by a compacted subgrade. The subbase provides uniform stable support and may provide subsurface drainage. The PCC pavement slab has considerable flexural strength and spreads the applied loads over a large area. Figure 2-1 illustrates a typical rigid pavement structure. Rigid pavements have a high degree of rigidity. Figure 2-2 shows how this inflexibility and the resulting beam action enable rigid pavements to distribute loads over large areas of the subgrade. Better rigid pavement performance requires that support for the PCC pavement slab be uniform. Rigid pavement strength is most economically built into the PCC pavement slab itself with optimum use of low-cost materials under the slab.

Portland Cement Concrete Pavement Slab

Subbase Course (may be stabilized)

Frost Protection (as appropriate)

Subgrade

Figure 2 - 1. Typical Rigid Pavement Structure

3

AC 150/5380-6B September 28, 2007

Wheel Load

PCC Pavement Slab

Foundation Support

Figure 2 - 2. Transfer of Wheel Load to Foundation in Rigid Pavement Structure

a. PCC Pavement Slab (Surface Layer). The PCC pavement slab provides structural support to the aircraft, provides a skid-resistant surface, and prevents the infiltration of excess surface water into the subbase.

b. Subbase. The subbase provides uniform stable support for the pavement slab. The subbase also serves to control frost action, provide subsurface drainage, control swelling of subgrade soils, provide a stable construction platform for rigid pavement construction, and prevent mud pumping of fine-grained soils. Rigid pavements generally require a minimum subbase thickness of 4 inches (100 mm).

c. Stabilized Subbase. All new rigid pavements designed to accommodate aircraft weighing 100,000 pounds (45,000 kg) or more must have a stabilized subbase. The structural benefit imparted to a pavement section by a stabilized subbase is reflected in the modulus of subgrade reaction assigned to the foundation.

d. Frost Protection Layer. In areas where freezing temperatures occur and where frost-susceptible soil with a high ground water table exists, engineers must consider frost action when designing pavements. Frost action includes both frost heave and loss of subgrade support during the frost-melt period. Frost heave may cause a portion of the pavement to rise because of the nonuniform formation of ice crystals in a frost-susceptible material (see Figure 2-3). Thawing of the frozen soil and ice crystals may cause pavement damage under loads. The frost protection layer functions as a barrier against frost action and frost penetration into the lower frost-susceptible layers.

Pavement Surface

Ice Crystals in Frost-Susceptible Layer

Upward Water Movement by Capillary Action

Figure 2 - 3. Formation of Ice Crystals in Frost-Susceptible Soil

4

September 28, 2007 AC 150/5380-6B

e. Subgrade. The subgrade is the compacted soil layer that forms the foundation of the pavement system. Subgrade soils are subjected to lower stresses than the surface and subbase courses. These stresses decrease with depth, and the controlling subgrade stress is usually at the top of the subgrade unless unusual conditions exist. Unusual conditions, such as a layered subgrade or sharply varying water content or densities, may change the locations of the controlling stress. The soils investigation should check for these conditions. The pavement above the subgrade must be capable of reducing stresses imposed on the subgrade to values that are low enough to prevent excessive distortion or displacement of the subgrade soil layer.

Since subgrade soils vary considerably, the interrelationship of texture, density, moisture content, and strength of subgrade material is complex. The ability of a particular soil to resist shear and deformation will vary with its density and moisture content. In this regard, the soil profile of the subgrade requires careful examination. The soil profile is the vertical arrangement of layers of soils, each of which may possess different properties and conditions. Soil conditions are related to the ground water level, presence of water-bearing strata, and the properties of the soil, including soil density, particle size, moisture content, and frost penetration. Since the subgrade soil supports the pavement and the loads imposed on the pavement surface, it is critical to examine soil conditions to determine their effect on grading and paving operations and the need for underdrains.

2-4. FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE. Flexible pavements support loads through bearing rather than flexural action. They comprise several layers of carefully selected materials designed to gradually distribute loads from the pavement surface to the layers underneath. The design ensures the load transmitted to each successive layer does not exceed the layer's load-bearing capacity. A typical flexible pavement section is shown in Figure 2-4. Figure 2-5 depicts the distribution of the imposed load to the subgrade. The various layers composing a flexible pavement and the functions they perform are described below:

Hot-Mix Asphalt Surface

Base Course (may be stabilized)

Subbase (optional)

Frost Protection (as appropriate)

Subgrade

Figure 2 - 4. Typical Flexible Pavement Structure

5

AC 150/5380-6B September 28, 2007

Wheel Load

Base Course

Subbase

Subgrade

Approximate Line of Wheel-Load Distribution

Area of Tire Contact

HMA Surface

Subgrade Support

Figure 2 - 5. Distribution of Wheel Load in Flexible Pavement

a. Bituminous Surface (Wearing Course). The bituminous surface, or wearing course, is made up of a mixture of various selected aggregates bound together with asphalt cement or other bituminous binders. The material used in the surface course is commonly referred to as Hot-Mix Asphalt (HMA). This surface prevents the penetration of surface water to the base course; provides a smooth, well-bonded surface free from loose particles, which might endanger aircraft or people; resists the stresses caused by aircraft loads; and supplies a skid-resistant surface without causing undue wear on tires.

b. Base Course. The base course serves as the principal structural component of the flexible pavement. It distributes the imposed wheel load to the pavement foundation, the subbase, and/or the subgrade. The base course must have sufficient quality and thickness to prevent failure in the subgrade and/or subbase, withstand the stresses produced in the base itself, resist vertical pressures that tend to produce consolidation and result in distortion of the surface course, and resist volume changes caused by fluctuations in its moisture content. The materials composing the base course are select hard and durable aggregates, which generally fall into two main classes: stabilized and granular. The stabilized bases normally consist of crushed or uncrushed aggregate bound with a stabilizer, such as Portland cement or bitumen. The quality of the base course is a function of its composition, physical properties, and compaction of the material.

c. Subbase. This layer is used in areas where frost action is severe or the subgrade soil is extremely weak. The subbase course functions like the base course. The material requirements for the subbase are not as strict as those for the base course since the subbase is subjected to lower load stresses. The subbase consists of stabilized or properly compacted granular material.

d. Frost Protection Layer. Some flexible pavements require a frost protection layer. This layer functions the same way in either a flexible or a rigid pavement. (See paragraph 2-3d.)

e. Subgrade. The subgrade is the compacted soil layer that forms the foundation of the pavement system. Subgrade soils are subjected to lower stresses than the surface, base, and subbase courses. Since load stresses decrease with depth, the controlling subgrade stress usually lies at the top of

6

September 28, 2007 AC 150/5380-6B

the subgrade. The combined thickness of subbase, base, and wearing surface must be great enough to reduce the stresses occurring in the subgrade to values that will not cause excessive distortion or displacement of the subgrade soil layer. (See paragraph 2-3e for factors affecting subgrade behavior.)

2-5. AIRPORT PAVEMENT OVERLAYS. Airport pavement overlays may correct deteriorating pavement surfaces, improve ride quality or surface drainage, maintain structural integrity, or increase pavement strength. Overlays are used when a pavement is damaged by overloading, requires strengthening to serve heavier aircraft, shows severe ponding because of uneven settling, or has simply served its design life and is worn out. Airport pavement overlays generally consist of either PCC or HMA pavements, and the resulting pavement system may be classified as either rigid or flexible for load-support purposes.

2-6. RECYCLED PAVEMENT STRUCTURES. The pavement elements discussed in paragraphs 2-4 and 2-5 also apply to pavements composed of recycled layers except that in-situ materials are recycled and used in place of importing selected materials. In-situ materials may be crushed, blended, rehandled, and/or treated to produce a controlled pavement layer. Recycled layers may make up the entire pavement structure or be used in combination with existing and/or new pavement layers. Recent advances in equipment and recycling techniques have allowed the use of in-place, recycled rigid pavements as base courses for both rigid and flexible pavement reconstruction.

7

AC 150/5380-6B September 28, 2007


8

September 28, 2007 AC 150/5380-6B

CHAPTER 3. PAVEMENT DISTRESS.

3-1. GENERAL. Various external signs or indicators make the deterioration of a pavement apparent, and often reveal the probable causes of the failure. This chapter provides a detailed discussion and description of the types of pavement distress and relates them to likely causal factors.

3-2. TYPES OF PAVEMENT DISTRESS. The discussions of problems related to pavement distress are generally based on whether the pavement has a rigid or flexible surface type. However, while different distresses possess their own particular characteristics, the various types generally fall into one of the following broad categories:

a. Cracking

b. Joint Seal Damage

c. Disintegration

d. Distortion

e. Loss of skid resistance

ASTM D 5340, Standard Test Method for Airport Pavement Condition Index Surveys, provides detailed examples of each distress. The Pavement-Transportation Computer Assisted Structural Engineering (PCASE) software package and the Department of Defense Unified Facilities Guide include similar examples. The PCASE software is available from the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers at https://transportation.wes.army.mil/triservice/pcase. The Unified Facilities Guide is available from several sources, including http://www.wbdg.org/ccb and http://65.204.17.188/report/doc_ufc.html.

3-3. RIGID PAVEMENT DISTRESSES.

a. Cracking. Cracks in rigid pavements often result from stresses caused by expansion and contraction or warping of the pavement. Overloading, loss of subgrade support, and insufficient and/or improperly cut joints acting singly or in combination are also possible causes. Several different types of cracking can occur:

(1) Longitudinal, Transverse, and Diagonal Cracks. A combination of repeated loads and shrinkage stresses usually causes this type of distress. It is characterized by cracks that divide the slab into two or three pieces. These types of cracks can indicate poor construction techniques, underlying pavement layers that are structurally inadequate for the applied load, or pavement overloads.

(2) Corner Breaks. Load repetition, combined with loss of support and curling stresses, usually causes cracks at the slab corner. The lack of support may be caused by pumping or loss of load transfer at the joint. This type of break is characterized by a crack that intersects the joints at a distance less than or equal to one-half of the slab length on both sides, measured from the corner of the slab. A corner crack differs from a corner spall in that the crack extends vertically through the entire slab thickness; a corner spall intersects the joint at an angle.

(3) Durability "D" Cracking. "D" cracking usually appears as a pattern of cracks running in the vicinity of and parallel to a joint or linear crack. It is caused by the concrete's inability to withstand environmental factors such as freeze-thaw cycles because of variable expansive aggregates.

9

AC 150/5380-6B September 28, 2007

This type of cracking may eventually lead to disintegration of the concrete within 1 to 2 feet (30 to 60 cm) of the joint or crack.

(4) Shrinkage Cracking. Shrinkage cracks are hairline cracks that are usually only a few feet long and do not extend across the entire slab. They are formed during the setting and curing of the concrete and usually do not extend through the depth of the slab. Typically, shrinkage cracks do not extend greater than 1/4-inch (6.4 mm) from the slab surface and may be primarily in the finished surface paste only.

b. Joint Seal Damage. Joint seal damage is any condition that enables soil or rocks to accumulate in the joints or that allows infiltration of water. Accumulation of materials prevents the slabs from expanding and may result in buckling, shattering, or spalling. Water infiltration through joint seal damage can cause pumping or deterioration of the subbase. Typical types of joint seal damage include stripping of joint sealant, extrusion of joint sealant, hardening of the filler (oxidation), loss of bond to the slab edges, and absence of sealant in the joint. Joint seal damage is caused by improper joint width, use of the wrong type of sealant, incorrect application, and/or not properly cleaning the joint before sealing.

c. Disintegration. Disintegration is the breaking up of a pavement into small, loose particles and includes the dislodging of aggregate particles. Improper curing and finishing of the concrete, unsuitable aggregates, and improper mixing of the concrete can cause this distress. Disintegration falls into several categories:

(1) Scaling, Map Cracking, and Crazing. Scaling is the disintegration and loss of the wearing surface. A surface weakened by improper curing or finishing and freeze-thaw cycles can lead to scaling. Map cracking or crazing refers to a network of shallow hairline cracks that extend only through the upper surface of the concrete. Crazing usually results from improper curing and/or finishing of the concrete and may lead to scaling of the surface. Alkali-Silica Reactivity (ASR) is another source of distress associated with map cracking. ASR is caused by an expansive reaction between aggregates containing silica and alkaline pore solutions of the cement paste.

(2) Joint Spalling. Joint spalling is the breakdown of the slab edges within 2 feet (60 cm) of the side of the joint. A joint spall usually does not extend vertically through the slab but intersects the joint at an angle. Joint spalling often results from excessive stresses at the joint or crack caused by infiltration of incompressible materials or weak concrete at the joint (caused by overworking) combined with traffic loads. Joint spalling also results when dowels, which can prevent slab movement, become misaligned either through improper placement or improper slippage preparation.

(3) Corner Spalling. Corner spalling is the raveling or breakdown of the slab within approximately 2 feet (60 cm) of the corner. It differs from a corner break in that the spall usually angles downward to intersect the joint, while a break extends vertically through the slab. The same mechanisms that cause joint spalling often cause corner spalling, but this type of distress may appear sooner because of increased exposure.

(4) Shattered Slab/Intersecting Cracks. A shattered slab is defined as a slab where intersecting cracks break up the slab into four or more pieces. This is primarily caused by overloading due to traffic and/or inadequate foundation support.

(5) Blowups. Blowups usually occur at a transverse crack or joint that is not wide enough to permit expansion of the concrete slabs. Insufficient width may result from infiltration of incompressible materials into the joint space or by gradual closure of the joint caused by expansion of the concrete due to ASR. When expansive pressure cannot be relieved, a localized upward movement of the

10

September 28, 2007 AC 150/5380-6B

slab edges (buckling) or shattering will occur in the vicinity of the joint. Blowups normally occur only in thin pavement sections, although blowups can also appear at drainage structures (manholes, inlets, etc.). The frequency and severity of blowups may increase with an asphalt overlay due to the additional heat absorbed by the dark asphalt surface. They generally occur during hot weather because of the additional thermal expansion of the concrete.

(6) Popouts. A popout is defined as a small piece of pavement that breaks loose from the concrete surface. This is caused by freeze-thaw action in combination with expansive aggregates. Popouts usually range from approximately 1 to 4 inches (25 to 100 mm) in diameter and from 1/2 to 2 inches (13 to 51 mm) deep. A popout may also be a singular piece of large aggregate that breaks loose from the concrete surface or may be clay balls in the concrete mix. Per ASTM D 5340, to count a slab as having this type of distress, an average greater than three Popouts per square yard (per square meter) is needed. If there is doubt in the average being greater than three Popouts per square yard, then at least three random 1-square yard areas should be evaluated.

(7) Patching. A patch is defined as an area where the original pavement has been removed and replaced by a filler material. Patching is usually divided into two types:

(a) Small. A small patch is defined as an area less than 5 ft2 (0.5 m2).

(b) Large and Utility Cuts. A large patch is defined as an area greater than 5 ft2

(0.5 m2). A utility cut is defined as a patch that has replaced the original pavement due to placement of underground utilities.

d. Distortion. Distortion refers to a change in the pavement surface’s original position, and it results from foundation settlement, expansive soils, frost-susceptible soils, or loss of fines through improperly designed subdrains or drainage systems. Two types of distortion generally occur:

(1) Pumping. The deflection of the slab when loaded may cause pumping, which is characterized by the ejection of water and underlying material through the joints or cracks in a pavement. As the water is ejected, it carries particles of gravel, sand, clay, or silt with it, resulting in a progressive loss of pavement support that can lead to cracking. Evidence of pumping includes surface staining and base or subgrade material on the pavement close to joints or cracks. Pumping near joints indicates poor joint-load transfer, a poor joint seal, and/or the presence of ground water.

(2) Settlement or Faulting. Settlement or faulting is a difference in elevation at a joint or crack caused by upheaval or nonuniform consolidation of the underlying pavement layer(s) material. This condition may result from loss of fines, frost heave, loss of load transfer device (key, dowel, etc.), or swelling soils.

e. Loss of Skid Resistance. Skid resistance refers to the ability of a pavement to provide a surface with the desired friction characteristics under all weather conditions. It is a function of the surface texture. Loss of skid resistance is caused by the wearing down of the textured surface through normal wear and tear or the buildup of contaminants.

(1) Polished Aggregates. Some aggregates become polished quickly under traffic. Naturally polished aggregates create skid hazards if used in the pavement without crushing. Crushing the naturally polished aggregates creates rough angular faces that provide good skid resistance.

11

AC 150/5380-6B September 28, 2007

(2) Contaminants. Rubber deposits building up over a period of time will reduce the surface friction characteristics of a pavement. Oil spills and other contaminants will also reduce the surface friction characteristics.

3-4. FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT DISTRESSES.

a. Cracking. Cracks in flexible pavements are caused by deflection of the surface over an unstable foundation, shrinkage of the surface, thermal expansion and contraction of the surface, poorly constructed lane joints, or reflection cracking. Five types of cracks commonly occur in these types of pavements:

(1) Longitudinal and Transverse Cracks. Longitudinal and transverse cracks often result from shrinkage or contraction of the HMA surface. Shrinkage of the surface material is caused by oxidation and age hardening of the asphalt material. Contraction is caused by thermal fluctuations. Poorly constructed paving lane joints may accelerate the development of longitudinal joints cracks.

(2) Block Cracking. Block cracks are interconnected cracks that divide the pavement into approximately rectangular pieces. The blocks may range in size from approximately 1 by 1 foot (0.3M by 0.3M) to 10 by 10 feet (3M by 3M). Block cracking is caused mainly by contraction of the asphalt and daily temperature cycling (that results in daily stress/strain cycling). It is not load associated. The occurrence of block cracking usually indicates that the asphalt has hardened significantly. Block cracking normally occurs over a large portion of pavement area, but sometimes will occur only in nontraffic areas. This type of distress differs from alligator cracking in that the alligator cracks form smaller, many-sided pieces with sharp angles. Also, unlike block cracks, alligator cracks are caused by repeated traffic loadings and are, therefore, located only in traffic areas (that is, wheel paths).

(3) Reflection Cracking. Vertical or horizontal movements in the pavement beneath an overlay cause this type of distress. These movements may be due to expansion and contraction caused by temperature and moisture changes or traffic loads. The cracks in HMA overlays reflect the crack pattern or joint pattern in the underlying pavement. They occur most frequently in HMA overlays on PCC pavements. However, they may also occur on overlays of HMA pavements wherever cracks or joints in the old pavement have not been properly repaired.

(4) Alligator or Fatigue Cracking. Alligator or fatigue cracking is a series of interconnecting cracks caused by fatigue failure of the HMA surface under repeated traffic loading. The cracking initiates at the bottom of the HMA surface (or stabilized base) where tensile stress and strain are highest under a wheel load. The cracks propagate to the surface initially as a series of parallel cracks. After repeated traffic loading or by excessive deflection of the HMA surface over a weakened or under-designed foundation, the cracks connect, forming many sided sharp angled pieces that develop a pattern resembling chicken wire or alligator skin. The pieces are less than 2 feet (0.6M) on the longest side.

(5) Slippage Cracks. Slippage cracks appear when braking or turning wheels cause the pavement surface to slide and deform. This usually occurs when there is a low-strength surface mix or poor bond between the surface and the next layer of the pavement structure. These cracks are crescent or half-moon-shaped with the two ends pointing away from the direction of traffic.

b. Disintegration. Disintegration in a flexible pavement is caused by insufficient compaction of the surface, insufficient asphalt binder in the mix, loss of adhesion between the asphalt coating and aggregate particles, or severe overheating of the mix.

12

September 28, 2007 AC 150/5380-6B

(1) Raveling and Weathering. The most common type of disintegration in HMA pavements is raveling/weathering. Raveling/weathering is the wearing away of the pavement surface caused by the dislodging of aggregate particles and the loss of asphalt binder. This distress may indicate that the asphalt binder has aged and hardened significantly. As the raveling/weathering continues, larger pieces are broken free, and the pavement takes on a rough and jagged appearance and can produce a significant source for Foreign Object Debris/Damage (FOD).

(2) Potholes. A pothole is defined as a disruption in the pavement surface where a potion of the pavement material has broken away, leaving a hole. Most potholes are caused by fatigue of the pavement surface. As fatigue cracks develop, they interlock forming alligator cracking. When the sections of cracked pavement are worked loose, they may eventually be picked out of the surface by continued wheel loads, thus forming a pothole. In northern climates, where freeze-thaw cycles are severe, pothole development is exacerbated due to the continuous freeze-thaw action and may not be related solely to traffic patterns. Although possible, potholes are not a common distress to airfields.

(3) Asphalt Stripping. Asphalt stripping is caused by moisture infiltration into the HMA pavement structure leading to “stripping” of the bituminous binder from the aggregate particles. Asphalt stripping of HMA pavements may also be caused by cyclic water-vapor pressures within the mixture scrubbing the binder from the aggregates.

(4) Jet Blast Erosion. Jet blast erosion is defined as a darkened area of pavement surface where the bituminous binder has been burned or carbonized. Localized burned areas may vary in depth up to approximately 1/2-inch (13 mm).

(5) Patching and Utility Cut Patch. A patch is defined as an area where the original pavement has been removed and replaced by a filler material. A patch is considered a defect in the pavement, regardless of how well it is performing. Deterioration of patch areas affects the riding quality and has FOD potential.

c. Distortion. Distortion in HMA pavements is caused by foundation settlement, insufficient compaction of the pavement courses, lack of stability in the bituminous mix, poor bond between the surface and the underlying layer of the pavement structure, and swelling soils or frost action in the subgrade. Four types of distortion commonly occur:

(1) Rutting. A rut is characterized by a surface depression in the wheel path. In many instances, ruts become noticeable only after a rainfall when the wheel paths fill with water. This type of distress is caused by a permanent deformation in any one of the pavement layers or subgrade, resulting from the consolidation or displacement of the materials due to traffic loads.

(2) Corrugation. Corrugation results from a form of plastic surface movement typified by ripples across the surface. Corrugation can be caused by a lack of stability in the mix and a poor bond between material layers.

(3) Shoving. Shoving is the localized bulging of a pavement surface. It can be caused by lack of stability in the mix or lateral stresses produced by adjacent PCC pavement during expansion.

(4) Depression. Depressions are localized low areas of limited size. In many instances, light depressions become noticeable only after a rain, when ponding creates "birdbath" areas. Depressions may result from traffic heavier than that for which the pavement was designed, localized settlement of the underlying pavement layers, or poor construction methods.

13

AC 150/5380-6B September 28, 2007

(5) Swelling. An upward bulge in the pavement's surface characterizes swelling. It may occur sharply over a small area or as a longer gradual wave. Both types of swell may be accompanied by surface cracking. A swell is usually caused by frost action surrounding dissimilar material types in the subgrade or by swelling soil.

d. Loss of Skid Resistance. Factors that decrease the skid resistance of a pavement surface and can lead to hydroplaning include too much asphalt in the bituminous mix, too heavy a tack coat, poor aggregate subject to wear, and buildup of contaminants. In bituminous pavements, a loss of skid resistance may result from the following:

(1) Polished Aggregate. Aggregate polishing is caused by repeated traffic applications. Polished aggregate is present when the potion of aggregate extending above the asphalt is either very small, of poor quality, or there are no rough or angular particles to provide good skid resistance.

(2) Contaminants. Accumulation of rubber particles, oils, or other external materials on the pavement surface will reduce the skid resistance of a pavement. Buildup of rubber deposits in pavement grooves will reduce the effectiveness of the grooves and increase the likelihood of hydroplaning.

(3) Bleeding. Bleeding is characterized by a film of bituminous material on the pavement surface that resembles a shiny, glass-like, reflecting surface that usually becomes quite sticky. It is caused by excessive amounts of asphalt binder in the mix and/or low air-void content and occurs when asphalt binder fills the voids in the mix during hot weather and then expands out onto the surface of the pavement. Bleeding may also result when an excessive tack coat is applied prior to placement of the HMA surface. Since the bleeding process is not reversible during cold weather, asphalt binder will accumulate on the surface. Extensive bleeding may cause a severe reduction in skid resistance.

(4) Fuel/Oil Spillage. Continuous fuel/oil spillage on a HMA surface will soften the asphalt. Areas subject to only minor fuel/oil spillage will usually heal without repair, and only minor damage will result.

3-5. DRAINAGE OF AIRPORT PAVEMENTS.

a. A proper drainage system is essential to preventive maintenance. Probably no other factor plays such an important role in determining the ability of a pavement to withstand the effects of weather and traffic. The drainage system collects and removes surface water runoff, removes excess underground water, lowers the water table, and protects all slopes from erosion. An inadequate drainage system can cause saturation of the subgrade and subbase, damage to slopes by erosion, and loss of the load-bearing capacity of the paved surfaces. Whenever pavement failure occurs, the airport should investigate the possibility of deficient drainage.

b. The damage mechanism of free water in the pavement system is related to the amount of free water in the boundaries between the structural layers of the pavement system. When water fills the voids and spaces at the boundaries between layers, heavy wheel loads applied to the surface of the pavement produce impacts on the water comparable to a water-hammer type of action. The resulting water pressure causes erosion of the pavement structure and ejection of the material out of the pavement.

c. There are two general classes of drainage systems: surface and subsurface. Classification depends on whether the water is on or below the surface of the ground at the point where it is first

14

September 28, 2007 AC 150/5380-6B

intercepted or collected for disposal. Where both types of drainage are required, it is generally good practice for each system to function independently.

(1) Surface Drainage. Surface drainage controls, collects, and disposes of water from rainstorms and melting snow and ice that accumulate on the surface of the pavement and nearby ground. Surface drainage of pavements is achieved by constructing the pavement surface and adjacent ground in a way that allows for adequate runoff. The water may be collected at the edges of the paved surface in ditches, gutters, and catch basins. Surface water should not be allowed to enter a subdrainage system as it often contains soil particles in suspension. As the water percolates through the granular material of the subdrain, these particles cause it to silt up. Inevitably, some water will enter the pavement structure through cracks, open joints, and other surface openings, but this penetration may be kept to a minimum by proper surface maintenance procedures.

(2) Subsurface Drainage. Subsurface drainage is provided for the pavement by a permeable layer of aggregate or permeable stabilized layers—such as cement-treated or asphalt-treated layers under the full width of the traveled way—with longitudinal pipes for collecting the water and outlet pipes for rapid removal of the water from the subsurface drainage system. Subsurface drains may also consist of perforated collection pipes or conduits in a permeable sand or gravel trench encased in geotextiles with outlet pipes. These systems remove excess water from pavement foundations to prevent weakening of the base and subgrade and to reduce damage from frost action. Subsurface drainage trenches placed at the pavement edge also prevent surface runoff moisture from entering the pavement structure from the pavement perimeter.

d. The current version of AC 150/5320-5, Airport Drainage, contains additional guidance and technical information.

15

AC 150/5380-6B September 28, 2007


16

September 28, 2007 AC 150/5380-6B

CHAPTER 4. GUIDELINES FOR INSPECTION OF PAVEMENTS.

4-1. INTRODUCTION TO PAVEMENT INSPECTION. This chapter presents guidelines and procedures for inspection of airport pavements. Airports should prioritize the upkeep and repair of all pavement surfaces in the aircraft operating areas of the airport to ensure continued safe aircraft operations. While deterioration of the pavements from usage and exposure to the environment cannot be completely prevented, a timely and effective maintenance program can minimize this deterioration. Adequate and timely maintenance is the greatest single means of controlling pavement deterioration. Many cases exist where inadequate maintenance characterized by the absence of a vigorously followed inspection program directly attributed to failures of airport pavements and drainage features. It should be noted that maintenance, no matter how effectively carried out, cannot overcome or compensate for a major design or construction inadequacy. However, it can prevent the total and possibly disastrous failure that can result from such deficiencies. The maintenance inspection can reveal at an early stage where a problem exists and thus provide enough warning and time to permit corrective action. Postponement of minor maintenance can develop into a major pavement repair project. The FAA recommends that airports follow ASTM D 5340, Standard Test Method for Airport Pavement Condition Index Surveys, when conducting preventive maintenance inspections. This standard employs the visual distress identification and rating system known as the Pavement Condition Index (PCI).

Although there are numerous distress types associated with airfield pavements, a particular concern on airfield pavements is the possibility that pavement distress will generate loose material that may strike aircraft propellers or be ingested into jet engines. This loose material and the resulting damage are commonly labeled as foreign object debris/damage (FOD). FOD can cause considerable damage to an aircraft and increase the cost of maintaining the aircraft in a safe operating condition. More important, FOD can cause undetected damage to an aircraft, making it unsafe to operate. In addition to the pavement inspection procedures noted below, all pavement inspections should address the issue of FOD to minimize its potential hazard. The most recent version of AC 150/5380-5, Debris Hazards at Civil Airports, provides guidance on reducing FOD hazards.

4-2. INSPECTION PROCEDURES. Maintenance is an ongoing process and a critical responsibility of airport personnel. Truly effective maintenance programs require a series of scheduled, periodic inspections or surveys, conducted by experienced engineers, technicians, or maintenance personnel. These surveys must be controlled to ensure that each element or feature being inspected is thoroughly checked, potential problem areas are identified, and proper corrective measures are recommended. The maintenance program must provide for adequate follow-up of the inspection to ensure that the corrective work is expeditiously accomplished and recorded. Although the organization and scope of maintenance activities will vary in complexity and degree from airport to airport, the general types of maintenance required are similar, regardless of airport size or extent of development.

a. Inspection Schedules. The airport is responsible for establishing a schedule for pavement inspections. Inspection schedules should ensure that all areas, particularly those that are not observed daily, are thoroughly checked. All paved areas should be inspected at least twice a year. In temperate climates, inspections should occur once in the spring and once in the fall. Severe storms or other conditions that may adversely affect the pavement may necessitate additional thorough inspections. Airport personnel should also solicit reports from airport users and conduct daily drive-by-type inspections.

b. Record keeping. The airport should prepare and maintain complete records of all inspections and maintenance performed. These records should document the severity level of existing distress types, their locations, their probable causes, remedial actions, and results of follow up inspections

17

AC 150/5380-6B September 28, 2007

and maintenance. In addition, the files should contain information on potential problem areas and preventive or corrective measures identified. Records of materials and equipment used to perform all maintenance and repair work should also be kept on file for future reference. Such records may be used later to identify materials and remedial measures that may reduce maintenance costs and improve pavement serviceability.

4-3. FRICTION SURVEYS. Airports should maintain runway pavements that provide surfaces with good friction characteristics under all weather conditions. Parameters that affect the skid resistance of wet pavement surfaces include the following:

a. Texture depth

b. Rubber deposits

c. Paint marking

d. Pavement abnormalities, such as rutting, raveling, and depression

Visual observations made during a pavement inspection are an inadequate predictor of skid resistance. The current version of AC 150/5320-12, Measurement, Construction, and Maintenance of Skid-Resistant Airport Pavement Surfaces, provides guidance on frequency and procedures for conducting friction surveys.

4-4. NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING. In addition to collecting information from visual inspections of the pavement area and about runway history, airports should consider collecting data from nondestructive testing. Such data are used to evaluate the pavement load-carrying capacity. Loads are applied to the pavement through loading plates or wheels, and the pavement deflection response is recorded. The stiffness or strength of the airport pavement can be related to the magnitude of these deflections. Nondestructive testing involves a large number of readings, and a statistical average is used. Instructions for taking the measurements and evaluating the test results to determine the load-carrying capacity of the pavement structure are contained in the current version of AC 150/5370-11, Use of Nondestructive Testing Devices in the Evaluation of Airport Pavements.

4-5. DRAINAGE SURVEYS. The maintenance program should take into account the importance of adequate drainage of surface and ground water because water is directly or partly responsible for many pavement failures and deterioration. Sufficient drainage for collection and disposal of surface runoff and excess ground water is vital to the stability and serviceability of pavement foundations. Trained personnel should conduct periodic and complete inspections of drainage systems and record and correct defective conditions of surface and subsurface drainage systems. Runway and taxiway edge drains and catch basins should be inspected at intervals (i.e., spring, summer, fall, and winter) and monitored following unusually heavy rainfall. The personnel making the inspection should look for distress signals that may indicate impending problems. These distress signals include the following:

a. Ponding of water

b. Soil buildup at pavement edge preventing runoff

c. Eroded ditches and spill basins

d. Broken or displaced inlet grates or manhole covers

18

September 28, 2007 AC 150/5380-6B

e. Clogged or silted inlet grates and manhole covers

f. Blocked subsurface drainage outlets

g. Broken or deformed pipes

h. Backfill settlement over pipes

i. Erosion around inlets

j. Generally poor shoulder shaping and random erosion

k. Discoloration of pavement at joints or cracks

4-6. PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS. Airport pavement management systems (APMS) provide one method of establishing an effective maintenance and repair system. An APMS is a systematic and consistent procedure for scheduling maintenance and rehabilitation based on maximizing benefits and minimizing costs. An APMS not only evaluates the present condition of a pavement, but also can be used to forecast its future condition. By projecting the rate of deterioration, an APMS can facilitate a life-cycle cost analysis for various alternatives and help determine when to apply the best alternative.

a. The primary component of any APMS is the ability to track a pavement's deterioration and determine the cause of the deterioration. This requires an evaluation procedure that is objective, systematic, and repeatable. One such procedure is the Pavement Condition Index (PCI). The PCI is a rating of the surface condition of a pavement and indicates functional performance. A PCI evaluation may also provide an indication of the pavement’s structural performance. Periodic PCI determinations on the same pavement will show the change in performance level over time. The PCI is determined in accordance with procedures contained in ASTM D 5340, Standard Test Method for Airport Pavement Condition Index Surveys.

b. The current version of AC 150/5380-7, Airport Pavement Management System, outlines the basic concepts of an APMS.

4-7. PAVEMENT PERFORMANCE. Airports can use the pavement condition survey to develop pavement performance data. Distress intensity recorded over time helps determine how the pavement is performing. The rate at which the distress intensity increases is a good indicator of the pavement performance.

4-8. PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM. Any airport requesting Federal funds for a project to replace or reconstruct a pavement under the airport grant assistance program must have implemented a pavement maintenance program. Appendix A contains the minimum requirements for such a program.

19

AC 150/5380-6B September 28, 2007


20

September 28, 2007 AC 150/5380-6B

CHAPTER 5. MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT.

5-1. GENERAL. Normal day-to-day pavement maintenance requires only hand tools, but some maintenance necessitates specialized equipment. For example, cleaning out joints in PCC pavements is best accomplished with hand-operated, motor-driven machines especially designed for the task. Specialized sawing equipment may be required to establish the proper joint sealant shape dimension when sealing cracks in HMA pavement. Equipment to apply nontoxic herbicides may be necessary to prevent weeds from growing until sealant materials can be applied. Expedient plow-type devices also aid in removing old joint material. Joint sealing can be accomplished by hand pouring from kettles with narrow spouts, but some sealing materials require pressure application with specialized equipment.

Most normal maintenance projects, however, require the following:

a. Mechanical Hammers. Mechanical hammers can be used to break PCC pavement slabs for easy removal. These hammers can also drill slabs. When using mechanical hammers, maintenance staff should take precautions to avoid damaging adjacent slabs.

b. Trailer-Type Asphalt Kettles. The use of trailer-type asphalt kettles can expedite patching and spot sealing. Kettles equipped with a powered hand-spray bar are valuable maintenance and repair items.

c. Compaction Equipment. Compaction of HMA patches and subbase repairs can be accomplished with hand tampers, but small vibrating compactors produce better and more-uniform results. These vibrating compactors are easy to operate, are transportable in small vehicles, work well in confined areas, and do an excellent job.

d. Distributors. A large-scale project such as seal coating an extensive area requires specialized equipment, including pressure distributors for bitumen, aggregate spreaders, and rollers. Generally, contractors or others organized for such large-scale activities should perform this type of work.

e. Work Crew. Two to six people, trained in the various techniques of repairing and familiar with the tools available to them, can perform the routine maintenance required by pavement surfaces. If the work requires more staff, it will probably be a major repair and require methods, materials, and equipment beyond those used for normal maintenance.

5-2. COMMON MATERIALS FOR MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR. The materials listed below are commonly used for maintenance and repair of pavements.

a. Hot-Mix Asphalt. HMA is a blend of asphalt binder and well-graded, high-quality aggregates. The materials are mixed in a plant and placed and compacted while hot. HMA is used for construction of new airfield pavement and patching and overlay of airfield pavements.

b. Tack Coat. A tack coat, usually a light application of emulsified asphalt, is applied to an existing pavement to provide a bond with an overlying course, such as a HMA overlay. A tack coat is also used on the sides of an existing pavement that has been cut vertically before patching. Asphalt emulsions are manufactured in several grades and are selected by the desired setting time.

c. Prime Coat. A prime coat of emulsified or cutback asphalt is applied to an aggregate base course for the following purposes:

21

AC 150/5380-6B September 28, 2007

(1) To waterproof the surface of the base

(2) To plug capillary voids

(3) To promote adhesion between the base and the surface course

d. Fog Seal. A fog seal is a light application of emulsified asphalt used to rejuvenate the surface of a HMA pavement.

e. Aggregate Seal. This process is used to seal the surface of weathered pavements. Aggregate seals consist of sprayed asphalts that are immediately covered with aggregate and rolled to seat the aggregate in the asphalt coating. The FAA does not recommend aggregate seals for airfield pavements because of the potential for propeller and engine damage caused by loose aggregates.

f. Slurry Seal. A slurry seal is a mixture of asphalt emulsion, fine aggregate, mineral filler, and water. The mixture is prepared in slurry form and applied in a film approximately 1/8 inch (3 mm) thick. Slurry seals are used to seal small cracks, correct surface conditions, and improve the skid resistance of pavement surfaces.

g. Coal-Tar Sealer. Coal-tar sealer is a coal-tar-based product designed to coat the surface and protect the pavement against fuel spill damage and the intrusion of air and water. It is cold applied and should be periodically reapplied and maintained. Coal-tar sealers may contain fine aggregates to enhance traction and applied in multiple coatings.

h. Crack and Joint Sealing Material for Flexible Pavement. Material for sealing cracks should meet ASTM standards for the type of pavement and service for which the pavement is intended.

(1) ASTM D 6690, Standard Specification for Joint and Crack Sealants, Hot Applied, for Concrete and Asphalt Pavements.

(2) Some airports have used silicone sealants to seal cracks and joints in bituminous pavements. Proper use of silicone sealants requires that the material modulus be matched to the application. If silicone sealants are used, they should meet ASTM D 5893, Standard Specification for Cold Applied, Single Component, Chemically Curing Silicone Joint Sealant for Portland Cement Concrete Pavements.

i. Crack and Joint Sealing Material for Rigid Pavement. Material for sealing joints in Portland cement concrete pavement may be hot- or cold-applied compounds, as long as they meet the following standards:

(1) ASTM D 3406, Standard Specification for Joint Sealant, Hot Applied, Elastomeric–Type, for Portland Cement Concrete Pavements.

(2) ASTM D 5893, Standard Specification for Cold Applied, Single Component, Chemically Curing Silicone Joint Sealant for Portland Cement Concrete Pavements.

(3) ASTM D 6690, Standard Specification for Joint and Crack Sealants, Hot Applied, for Concrete and Asphalt Pavements.

22

September 28, 2007 AC 150/5380-6B

(4) ASTM D 7116, Standard Specification for Joint Sealants, Hot Applied, Jet Fuel Resistant Types, for Portland Cement Concrete. It is important to note that joint sealants conforming to ASTM D 7116 are not compatible with asphalt pavements and should only be used for rigid pavements.

(5) Federal Specification SS-S-200E, Sealing Compounds, Two-Component, Jet-Blast Resistant, Cold Applied, for Portland Cement Concrete Pavement.

j. Crack Filler Material for Flexible or Rigid Pavement. Material for filling cracks in rigid or flexible pavement should meet ASTM D 5078, Standard Specification for Crack Filler, Hot-Applied, for Asphalt Concrete and Portland Cement Concrete Pavements.

k. Precured Joint Sealing Material for Rigid Pavement. Precured material for sealing joints in rigid pavement should meet ASTM C 1518, Standard Specification for Precured Elastomeric Silicone Joint Sealants.

l. Concrete. Concrete is a blend of Portland cement, fine and coarse aggregate, and water, with or without additives. Concrete is used to repair a distressed Portland cement concrete pavement so it may be used at its original designed capacity.

m. Epoxy Grouts and Concretes. There are many types of epoxy resins; the type to be used depends on the intended application. Under normal conditions, mixed resins may be workable up to 1 hour after mixing. Repairs with epoxy materials are costly, so their use should be limited to small areas and their application left to experienced personnel.

5-3. EQUIPMENT USED FOR PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE. There are many different types and models of equipment airports can use for pavement maintenance. Maintenance crews commonly use the equipment listed below for the following types of projects:

a. Pavement Removal.

(1) Power Saws. A pavement power saw is usually a one-person-operated, dolly-mounted unit with an abrasive circular blade. This type of saw can cut a straight line through flexible or rigid pavements and leave vertical sides.

(2) Cutting Disks. A cutting disk is a circular, heavy-duty steel plate with a sharpened edge. The disk is usually attached to a motor grader or other piece of equipment capable of pushing the disk through a bituminous pavement. It is limited to approximately 3 inches (8 cm) in cutting depth. Since the cutting disk is much faster than a saw, its use should be considered when larger areas must be removed.

(3) Jackhammers. Jackhammers with a chisel head are commonly used for cutting pavement surfaces.

(4) Pavement Grinders. A pavement grinder may be a one-person-operated, dolly-mounted unit with an abrasive cylindrical head 4 inches (10 cm) or more wide, or it may be variable-width diamond grinding equipment. Diamond grinding is a common rehabilitation technique used for tasks as varied as paint removal and pavement texturing.

(5) Cold Milling Machines. Cold milling machines use an adjustable rotating mandrel with cutting bits to remove various depths of pavement material. Bits can be added or

23

AC 150/5380-6B September 28, 2007

removed to vary the cutting width and roughness. Advantages of cold milling include speed of removal, precision of removal, and grade control.

(6) Hand Tools. Hand tools can be used to make vertical cuts through pavements and to break up deteriorated pavement. Chisels, sledgehammers, shovels, pry bars, and picks fall into this category of equipment.

(7) Front-end Loaders and Skid-steer Loaders. Front-end loaders are useful when loading trucks with removed pavement. Skid-steer loaders are small versatile loaders that can be equipped with numerous attachments. Their small size and maneuverability make them ideal for maintenance activities.

(8) Dump Trucks. Dump trucks are used to haul removed pavement and repair materials.

b. Maintenance Equipment.

(1) Asphalt Kettle. Asphalt kettles are usually small-tractor-mounted units that have the capacity to heat and store 40 to 500 gallons (150 – 2000 liters) of bituminous material. A pump forces the liquid material through spray nozzles located on a hand-held hose. These units are used for priming and tacking on small jobs and for crack or surface sealing of HMA surfaces.

(2) Aggregate Spreaders. Aggregate spreaders can be either truck-mounted or separate units. They are used to evenly place a controlled amount of sand or aggregate on an area.

(3) Hand Tools. Rakes, lutes, and other such hand tools are used to move and level material placed in a patch area.

c. Compaction Equipment.

(1) Vibratory Plate Compactors. Vibratory plate compactors are hand-operated units used to compact granular base or HMA plant-mix materials.

(2) Vibratory and Non Vibratory Steel-Wheel Rollers. Steel-wheel rollers are used to compact material, including HMA in patchwork areas. Smaller rollers can be hand operated, while large rollers are self-powered.

(3) Rubber-Tired Rollers. Rubber-tired rollers are self-powered and used to compact HMA pavement.

d. Crack and Joint Sealing Equipment.

(1) Joint Plow. A joint plow is used to remove old sealer from joints. This is usually a specially made tool attached to a skid-steer loader.

(2) Joint Router. A joint router is used to clear existing cracks or joints to be resealed. A router is usually a self-powered machine operating a rotary cutter or revolving cutting tool. A rotary routing tool with a V-shaped end can be used for cleaning out random cracks. The FAA does not recommend rotary cutting tools for PCC pavements due to excessive fracturing of aggregates. The use of a random crack saw is preferred.

24

September 28, 2007 AC 150/5380-6B

(3) Random Crack Saw. A random crack saw is designed to follow irregular crack patterns in concrete and asphalt surfaces. The crack saw utilizes small diameter, dry-cut diamond blades in standard widths to create smooth sided cuts to prepare surfaces for proper crack filling. Maximum straight line cutting depth is 1-1/2 inches (38 mm). A center mounted blade configuration allows that crack saws to pivot about its own axis to more exactly follow random crack patterns easily.

(4) Power Brush. A power-driven wire brush may be used to clean joints after all of the old joint sealer has been removed.

(5) Air Compressor and Sand Blasting. Sand blasting may be used for final removal of old joint sealant, and the FAA recommends it as the final cleaning method for PCC surfaces prior to application of new sealant. Joints and cracks should be blown out with clean compressed air immediately before applying new sealer. Air compressors should be equipped with oil and moisture traps to prevent contaminating the cleaned surface.

(6) Pavement Sweeper. A pavement sweeper can be used for cleaning the pavement surface and removing excess aggregate. Cleaning operations are necessary in preparation for seal coating and crack filling.

(7) Heating Kettle. A heating kettle is a mobile, indirect-fired double boiler used to melt hot-applied joint sealing material. It is equipped with a means to agitate and circulate the sealer to ensure uniform heating and melting of the entire charge in the kettle. Sealants may be applied to joints with a pressure base attached directly to a pump unit on the kettle.

(8) Pouring Pot. A pouring pot is hand carried or mounted on a hand-pushed pot dolly and used to pour hot sealing materials into a previously prepared crack or joint.

(9) High-pressure Water Sprayer. A water sprayer can be used to clean out joints prior to resealing and to clean vertical faces of pavement to be patched.

(10) Hot Air Lance. A hot air lance enhances adhesion by drying and heating cracks in existing bituminous material while removing debris prior to crack sealing.

e. Removal of Pavement Markings.

(1) High Pressure Water Jet. A high-pressure water jet, with proper selection of spray nozzle and pressure, can be highly effective in removal of pavement markings.

(2) Abrasive Blasting. Pavement markings can be removed by the impact of edged particles accelerated by pressurized air, although care must be exercised to avoid damage to the pavement surface.

(3) Solvent Cleaning. Chemical agents can be employed to remove markings from pavement, but proper attention must be paid to environmental concerns and cleanup.

25

AC 150/5380-6B September 28, 2007


26

September 28, 2007 AC 150/5380-6B

CHAPTER 6. METHODS OF REPAIR.

6-1. GENERAL. This chapter describes various methods airports can use to correct airfield pavement distress. While these repair methods apply to specific types of distress and pavements, they should all take into account the possibility of FOD to aircraft. Untidy repair activities may leave potential FOD at or near the repair sites. Improperly constructed repairs may disintegrate and cause a FOD potential. All maintenance activities must include quality control monitoring to assure that repairs are conducted properly and clean-up activities undertaken to remove this potential. The current version of AC 150/5380-5, Debris Hazards at Civil Airports, provides additional guidance to help eliminate debris hazards associated with maintenance activities.

a. Visible evidence of excessive stress levels or environmental distress in pavement systems may include cracks, holes, depressions, and other types of pavement distresses. The formation of distresses in airport pavements may severely affect the structural integrity, ride quality, and safety of airport pavements. To alleviate the effects of distresses and to improve the airport pavement serviceability, airports should adopt an effective and timely maintenance program and adequate repair procedures.

b. In all cases of pavement distress, the first step in rehabilitating a pavement is to determine the causes of distress. Then, the proper procedures for repair - which will not only correct the damage, but also prevent or retard its further occurrence - may be applied. Pavement repairs should be made as quickly as possible after the need for them arises to ensure continued and safe aircraft operations. Airports should perform repairs at early stages of distress, even when the distresses are considered minor. A delay in repairing pavements may allow minor distresses to progress into major failures. While deterioration of pavements due to traffic and adverse weather conditions cannot be completely prevented, maintenance and repair programs can significantly reduce the rate of deterioration and minimize the damage.

c. Weather conditions may limit repair measures undertaken to prevent further pavement damage. For example, rehabilitation by crack filling is more effective in cool and dry weather conditions, whereas pothole patches, seal coats, and other surface treatments require warm, dry weather for best results. This does not mean that resurfacing work cannot be performed under cold and damp conditions or that crack filling cannot be done in warm weather. Rather, these repairs just require much greater care when made during such periods.

d. The minimum depth of repair for Portland cement concrete should be 2 inches (5 cm). Repairs made thinner than 2 inches (5 cm) usually deteriorate quickly on an airfield pavement. (Most distresses needing repair will extend at least 2 inches (5 cm) into the pavement.) Rigid pavement repairs that are thinner than 2 inches (5 cm) may benefit from the use of epoxy materials.

6-2. REPAIR METHODS FOR RIGID PAVEMENTS.

a. Crack Repair and Sealing. Sealing cracks prevents surface moisture from entering the pavement structure. This type of repair first requires establishing a properly shaped sealant reservoir, which should be done with a saw rather than with router equipment, because routers use a mechanical impact to remove material and can cause micro-cracks in the concrete. Refer to Figures C-1A and C-1B in Appendix C for generic typical details for crack repair and sealing.

(1) Longitudinal, Transverse, and Diagonal Cracks. The procedures for repairing these types of cracks are discussed in the following generic specifications of Appendix B.

27

AC 150/5380-6B September 28, 2007

(a) Item M-361, Hot-Applied Joint and Crack Sealants for Rigid (Portland Cement Concrete) and Flexible (Bituminous) Pavements.

(b) Item M-362, Silicone Joint and Crack Sealants for Rigid (Portland Cement Concrete) and Flexible (Bituminous) Pavements.

(2) Corner Breaks. The procedures for repairing these types of breaks are discussed in the following generic specification of Appendix B: Item M-564, Repair of Pavement Distresses in Rigid (Portland Cement Concrete) Pavements. Refer to Figures C-2 and C-3 in Appendix C for generic typical details for repairing corner breaks, including the placement of dowel bars or tie-bars as necessary.

(3) "D" Cracking. This type of distress usually requires repairing the complete slab since "D" cracking will normally reappear adjacent to the repaired areas. Temporary repairs can be made using the technique noted in paragraph 6-2a(2) or 6-2b(1).

(4) Joint Seal Damage. The procedures for repairing joint seal damage are discussed in the following generic specifications of Appendix B.


(b) Item M-362, Silicone Joint and Crack Sealants for Rigid (Portland Cement Concrete) and Flexible (Bituminous) Pavements.

(c) In addition to these generic specifications above, when addressing joint seal damage of an existing preformed sealant, that existing joint sealant may be replaced with new preformed sealant depending on the condition of the joint. If the joint can be re-sawn straight and at a uniform width, even if that joint width is greater than the existing joint width, preformed sealant may be used. In this case, the area of repair must extend from one joint intersection to the next joint intersection. Partial replacement is not acceptable. Refer to Figure C-4 in Appendix C for a generic typical detail for resealing/re-sawing joints.

(5) Shrinkage Cracks. Shrinkage cracks are non-structural and non-propagating. These types of cracks should be considered cosmetic and not subject to conventional repairs. Epoxy cement surface pasting of shrinkage cracks may hide the blemishes, but is not considered critical for the longevity of the pavement.

b. Disintegration. If not impeded in its early stages, disintegration can progress rapidly until the pavement requires complete rebuilding. Refer to Figures C-5 through C-9 in Appendix C for generic typical details for repairing joint spalling, corner spalling, and blowups, including the placement of dowel bars or tie-bars as necessary if full-depth replacement is required. Refer to Figures C-10 and C-11 in Appendix C for generic typical details of saw cut control joints for rigid pavement repairs.

(1) Scaling, Map Cracking, and Crazing. This distress is often noticeable with little or no surface deterioration. Severe cases of scaling, map cracking, or crazing can produce considerable FOD, which can damage propellers and jet engines. If the distress is severe and produces FOD, the repair method is to remove the immediate surface and provide a thin bonded overlay. The procedures for repairing these types of distress are discussed in the following generic specification of Appendix B: Item M-564, Repair of Pavement Distresses in Rigid (Portland Cement Concrete) Pavements.

28

September 28, 2007 AC 150/5380-6B

(2) Joint Spalling and Corner Spalling. The procedure for the repair of spalls is discussed in the following generic specification of Appendix B: Item M-564, Repair of Pavement Distresses in Rigid (Portland Cement Concrete) Pavements.

(3) Shattered Slab/Intersecting Cracks. A shattered slab requires replacing the full slab. Follow the same procedures used for blowup repairs except remove unstable subgrade materials and replace with select material. Correct poor drainage conditions by installing drains for removal of excess water.

(4) Blowups. Blowups may be repaired using the procedures discussed in the following generic specification of Appendix B: Item M-564, Repair of Pavement Distresses in Rigid (Portland Cement Concrete) Pavements.

(5) Popouts. Popouts may be filled with the same materials as used for repairing cracks or joints in PCC pavements.

(6) Patching. Patching small, large or utility cuts typically require removal and replacement of the patch as discussed in the following generic specification of Appendix B: Item M-564, Repair of Pavement Distresses in Rigid (Portland Cement Concrete) Pavements. For extensive large patches, removal and replacement of the slab is recommended. Refer to Figures C-8 and C-9 in Appendix C for generic typical details for patching, including the placement of dowel bars or tie-bars as necessary and installation of nonabsorbent board when the patch is a joint.

c. Distortion. If not too extensive, some forms of distortion, such as that caused by settlement, can be remedied by raising the slab to the original grade. Slabjacking procedures may be used to correct this type of distress. In slabjacking, a grout is pumped under pressure through holes cored in the pavement into the void under the pavement. This creates an upward pressure on the bottom of the slab in the area around the void. The upward pressure lessens as the distance from the grout hole increases. Thus, it is possible to raise one corner of a slab without raising the entire slab. Due to the special equipment and experience required, slabjacking is usually best performed by specialty contractors. An option for repairing some types of settlement or faulting, which are not extensive in grade variation, is to micro-mill the pavement surface to true and level.

d. Loss of Skid Resistance. Rehabilitation treatment includes resurfacing, milling, diamond grinding, and surface cleaning. Grooving may be considered when a loss of skid resistance is observed. Grooving does not impact the surface texture but does provide a channel for water that becomes trapped between a pavement and the tire to escape. Grooving thus minimizes the potential for hydroplaning during wet conditions.

(1) Polished Aggregate. Since polished aggregate distress normally occurs over an extensive area, consider milling, grooving, or diamond grinding the entire pavement surface. PCC and HMA resurfacing may also be used to correct this condition.

(2) Contaminants. Remove rubber deposits with high-pressure water or biodegradable chemicals.

6-3. TEMPORARY PATCHING OF RIGID PAVEMENTS. Broken rigid pavement areas can be patched with flexible pavement as an interim measure. Full-depth HMA repairs will interrupt the structural integrity of the rigid pavement and may lead to additional failures. Consequently, such full-depth repairs should be considered temporary, and corrective long-term repairs should be scheduled. Temporary repair for corner cracks, diagonal cracks, blowups, and spalls can be made using the

29

AC 150/5380-6B September 28, 2007

procedures discussed in the following generic specification of Appendix B: Item M-363, Bituminous Pavement Repair for Patching Flexible (Bituminous) Pavements and Temporary Repairs to Rigid (Portland Cement Concrete) Pavements. Refer to Figures C-12 and C-13 in Appendix C for generic typical details of temporary patching of rigid pavements with flexible pavement.

6-4. REPAIR METHODS FOR FLEXIBLE PAVEMENTS.

a. Crack Sealing. Cracking takes many forms. In some cases, simple crack filling may be the proper corrective action. Refer to Figures C-14 through C-19 in Appendix C for generic typical details for crack sealing. Some cracks, however, require complete removal of the cracked area and the installation of drainage.

(1) Longitudinal, Transverse, Reflection, and Block Cracking. The procedures for repairing these types of cracks are discussed in the following generic specifications of Appendix B.


(b) Item M-462, Cold-Applied Joint and Crack Sealants for Flexible (Bituminous) Pavements.

(c) Item M-362, Silicone Joint and Crack Sealants for Rigid (Portland Cement Concrete) and Flexible (Bituminous) Pavements.

(d) Item M-461, Hot-Applied Crack Sealants/Fillers with Fibers for Flexible (Hot-Mix Asphalt) Pavement Overlays.

(2) Alligator Cracking. Permanent repairs by patching may be carried out as discussed in the following generic specification of Appendix B: Item M-363, Bituminous Pavement Repair for Patching Flexible (Bituminous) Pavements and Temporary Repairs to Rigid (Portland Cement Concrete) Pavements. The temporary measure would be the application of an asphalt emulsion, with or without aggregate, to seal the area to reduce FOD potential.

(3) Slippage Cracks. One repair method commonly used for slippage cracks involves removing the affected area and patching with HMA plant-mixed material. Specific steps are discussed in the following generic specification of Appendix B: Item M-363, Bituminous Pavement Repair for Patching Flexible (Bituminous) Pavements and Temporary Repairs to Rigid (Portland Cement Concrete) Pavements. The temporary measure would be the application of an asphalt emulsion, with or without aggregate, to seal the area to reduce FOD potential.

b. Disintegration. If not impeded in its early stages, disintegration can progress rapidly until the pavement requires complete rebuilding. Permanent repairs by patching may be carried out as discussed in the following generic specification of Appendix B: Item M-363, Bituminous Pavement Repair for Patching Flexible (Bituminous) Pavements and Temporary Repairs to Rigid (Portland Cement Concrete) Pavements. Sealer-rejuvenator products can be applied to retard disintegration. The products help reverse the aging process of the surface asphalt. Deterioration from raveling may also be impeded by applying a light fog seal or a slurry seal. The basic procedures for either surface treatment are as follows:

(1) Sweep the surface free of all dirt and loose aggregate material.

30

September 28, 2007 AC 150/5380-6B

(2) Apply the surface treatment.

(3) Close to traffic until the seal has cured.

c. Distortion. Repair techniques for distortion range from leveling the surface by filling with new material to completely removing the affected area and replacing with new material as discussed in the following generic specification of Appendix B: Item M-363, Bituminous Pavement Repair for Patching Flexible (Bituminous) Pavements and Temporary Repairs to Rigid (Portland Cement Concrete) Pavements. Cold milling can be employed prior to overlaying for many of these distresses. Temporary measures for these types of distresses are discussed in the following paragraphs.

(1) Rutting. The industry provides numerous products that are capable of temporarily repairing rutted surfaces. Any of the products considered for use should have a proven track record with the local State Department of Transportation (DOT) and should be on the current State's DOT listing of pre-approved products and materials for this particular type of repair. For example, these products include polymer modified cementitious based materials, polymer modified noncementitious based materials, polymer modified asphalt based materials, and epoxy resin based elastomeric compounds. Important typical physical properties to consider when selecting the product include tensile strength, elongation, hardness, compressive strength, resilience to deflection, impact resistance, and bonding strength. Follow manufacturer's recommendations for installation requirements based on the selected product and pavement conditions.

(2) Corrugation and Shoving or Swelling. The repair procedure for these types of distress is the same as for patch repair of alligator cracking.

d. Loss of Skid Resistance. Treatment for loss of skid resistance includes removal of excess asphalt for bleeding conditions, resurfacing, grooving to improve surface drainage, and removing of rubber deposits.

(1) Polished Aggregate. One means of correcting this condition is to cover the surface with an aggregate seal coat. Grooving, milling, or diamond grinding the pavement surface are also useful techniques.

(2) Contaminants. Rubber deposits may be removed by use of high-pressure water or biodegradable chemicals.

(3) Bleeding. For minor bleeding, a pavement milling or grinding machine may be used to remove the excess asphalt by milling off 1/8 inch to 1/4 inch (3 to 6 mm) of pavement. Prior to milling or grinding, the use of infra-red heaters to soften the HMA pavement surface should be tried. After heating of the pavement surface, scrape the asphalt binder from the surface, apply blotter-sand, roll with a steel-drum roller, then remove any excess blotter-sand from the surface. Repeat the process if bleeding re-occurs through the blotter-sand.

(4) Fuel/Oil Spillage. Permanent repairs for areas subjected to continuous fuel/oil spillage consist of removal of the damaged pavement and replacement with rigid or flexible pavement. For isolated areas, treat with a biodegradable chemical cleaner made especially for cleaning pavements, and apply a coal-tar emulsion seal coat or other fuel-resistant coating.

6-5. ADDITIONAL REPAIR METHODS. The following documents describe repair procedures in greater detail:

• MS-16, Asphalt in Pavement Maintenance. Asphalt Institute

31

AC 150/5380-6B September 28, 2007

• Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) 3-270-01 O&M: Asphalt Maintenance and Repair. USCOE, NFEC, AFCESA

• Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) 3-270-04 O&M: Concrete Repair. USCOE, NFEC, AFCESA • Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) 3-270-03 O&M: Concrete Crack and Partial-Depth Spall Repair.

USCOE, NFEC, AFCESA

The Unified Facilities Criteria manuals can be accessed at http://www.wbdg.org/ccb, http://www.wbdg.org/references/pa_dod.php, http://pdc.usace.army.mil/library/ufc, or at http://65.204.17.188/report/doc_ufc.html.

Tables 6-1 through 6-10 summarize maintenance and repair procedures for rigid and flexible pavements.

Table 6 - 1. QUICK GUIDE FOR MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF COMMON PAVEMENT SURFACE PROBLEMS

PROBLEM PROBABLE CAUSE REPAIR

Crack and joint sealer missing or not bonded to slabs

- Faces of joints (cracks) not clean when filled - Incorrect application temperature of sealer - Wrong kind of seal material - Improper joint width

- Remove old material sealer if extensive areas affected; clean (preferably by sandblasting) joints and cracks; reseal properly.

Random cracking - Uncontrolled shrinkage (improper joint spacing) - Overstressed slabs - Slab support lost - Subgrade settlement - Bitumen too hard or overheated in mix

- Clean and seal newly formed cracks; replace subbase to establish support; - If pavement being overloaded, probably will require overlay.

or breakup Rigid Pavement - Overworked finishing operation - Inadequate curing Flexible Pavement - Overheated binder - Poor aggregate gradation - Insufficient binder - Incorrect binder or aggregate - Fuel spillage - Stripping

Rigid Pavement - Remove and replace panel - Resurface with thin bonded concrete - Resurface area with a bituminous concrete. Flexible Pavement - Apply seal coat - Overlay.

Joint (1) faulting or (2) spalling

Faulting (1) - Variable support for un-bonded slabs - Loss of load-transfer capability Spalling (2) - Incompressible matter in joint spaces - Excessive joint finishing

Faulting (1) - Remove problem slab; replace slab (dowel to existing pavement). Spalling (2) - Clean joint; refill with bituminous-sand mix; reseal.

Pumping - Saturated pavement foundation - Lack of subbase

- Prevent entrance of water (correct the drainage problem) - Pump slurry under slabs to reseal - Replace slabs and slab foundation - Install drainage.

32

September 28, 2007 AC 150/5380-6B

PROBLEM PROBABLE CAUSE REPAIR

Surface irregularities (rutting, washboarding, birdbaths, undulations)

Rigid Pavement - Poor placing control - Broken slabs - Poor finishing Flexible Pavement - Non-uniform settlement from inadequate compaction of pavement components or fill - Unstable mix (poor aggregate gradation, too rich, etc.) - Poor laying control

Rigid Pavement - Patch local areas - Overlay if widespread Flexible Pavement - Patch local areas - Apply leveling course - Roto-mill.

Bleeding of bituminous binder

- Too much binder in mix (overly rich mix) - Scrape off excess material; blot with sand. NOTE: Bleeding is usually an indication that other surface deformities (rutting, washboarding, etc.) will occur.

Potholes - Water entering pavement structures - Segregation in base course material

- Remove and replace base (and subbase if required); replace surface and seal.

Oxidation of bituminous binder

- Lack of timely seal coat - Binder overheated in mixing - Wrong grade of asphalt for climate

- Apply seal coat - Heater planer - Resurface.

Map cracking, crazing, alligator cracking

Rigid Pavement - Excessive surface finishing - Alkali-Aggregate Reactivity Flexible Pavement - Overload - Oxidized binder - Underdesigned surface course (too thin)

Rigid Pavement - If surface deforms or breaks, resurface, grind. Flexible Pavement - Overlay - Apply seal coat.

Popouts at joints - Dowel misaligned - Fill popout hole with bituminous concrete or bituminous sand mix (if recurring, may require replacement of slabs).

Slab blowup - Incompressible material in joints preventing slab from expanding - Alkali-Aggregate Reactivity

- Replace slab in blowup area; clean and reseal joints.

Slipperiness Rigid Pavement - Improper finish (too smooth) - Improper type of curing membrane - Excessive curing membrane - Polished aggregate - Rubber deposits Flexible Pavement - Overly rich mix - Poorly designed mix - Polished aggregate - Improperly applied seal coat - Wrong kind of seal coat - Rubber deposits

Rigid Pavement - If finish too smooth, resurfacing required to provide texture - Wire broom to remove curing membrane - Grooving - Remove rubber. Flexible Pavement - Apply textured seal coat - Grooving - Remove rubber.

33

AC 150/5380-6B September 28, 2007

Table 6 - 2. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF RIGID PAVEMENT SURFACES – CRACKING

PAVEMENT DISTRESS

PAVEMENT DISTRESS SEVERITY

MAINT./ REPAIR

TYPE

SUGGESTED MAINT./ REPAIR METHOD

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION

Longitudinal, Transverse, or Diagonal Cracking

L surface crack R/P No action none

M < 1/8" (3.2 mm) wide R/P No action none

H ≥ 1/8" (3.2 mm) wide R/P Rotary-random saw and

seal hot-applied sealant cold-applied sealant conventional mix

N pavement ≤ 12" (0.3M) R/P Full-depth repair w/ #4

rebar

pre-packaged mix w/ aggregate

thick rapid setting, early strength

Corner Breaks N

pavement > 12" (0.3M) thick

R/P Full-depth repair w/ #5 rebar

conventional mix rapid setting, early strength

joints parallel conventional mix

N direction of/ or oblique to traffic

R/P Full-depth repair w/ load transfer bars rapid setting, early

strength

R/P Remove and replace entire slab conventional mix

Durability “D” Cracking N

T/E

Same repair as Corner Breaks Same repair as Scaling, Map Cracking, or Crazing Partial depth repair, mill 2-3” (5-7.6 cm) High quality HMA

Shrinkage N R No action none

Cracking Other Fill voids w/ cement paste epoxy cement

LEGEND:

N = No degree of severity R = Recommended

L = Low P = Permanent M = Medium T = Temporary H = High E = Emergency

34

September 28, 2007 AC 150/5380-6B

Table 6 - 3. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF RIGID PAVEMENT SURFACES – JOINT SEAL DAMAGE

PAVEMENT DISTRESS


MAINT./ REPAIR

TYPE



N Conventional Remove old and reseal hot-applied sealant

Joint Seal Damage

joint seal R/P joint cold-applied sealant

N Preformed compression joint seal

R/P Remove old and reseal joint

hot-applied sealant cold-applied sealant preformed sealant

LEGEND:



35

AC 150/5380-6B September 28, 2007

Table 6 - 4. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF RIGID PAVEMENT SURFACES – DISINTEGRATION

PAVEMENT DISTRESS


MAINT./ REPAIR

TYPE



L R/P Seal Penetrating concrete

sealer No action none

Scaling, Map Cracking, or Crazing

M T/E Micro-mill and seal surface asphalt emulsion

H

R/P Micro-mill to grade install thin bonded overlay

high performance concrete

conventional mix R/P Remove and replace if

extensive area rapid setting, early strength pre-packaged mix w/ aggregate

Joint Spalling N R/P Saw cut, remove unsound

concrete and patch pre-packaged mix w/o aggregate rapid setting, early strength

T/E Remove unsound concrete, patch

HMA pavement overlay pre-packaged mix w/ aggregate

Corner N R/P Saw cut, remove unsound

concrete and patch pre-packaged mix w/o aggregate

Spalling rapid setting, early strength

T/E Remove unsound concrete, patch

HMA pavement overlay

Shattered Slab/ Intersecting Cracks

N R/P Remove and replace entire slab conventional mix

Blowups N R/P Remove and replace concrete full-depth conventional mix

Popouts

L ≤ 2" (5 cm) diameter R/P Seal

hot-applied sealant cold-applied sealant elastomeric compound

36

September 28, 2007 AC 150/5380-6B

PAVEMENT DISTRESS


MAINT./ REPAIR

TYPE



M -H

> 2" (5 cm) diameter R/P Patch w/ elastomeric

compound w/ aggregate

Elastomeric compound w/ aggregate

L R No action None pre-packaged mix w/ aggregate

M R/P Remove and replace the

patch pre-packaged mix w/o aggregate

Patching, Small

rapid setting, early strength

T/E Seal cracks within patch hot-applied sealant cold-applied sealant pre-packaged mix w/ aggregate

H R/P Remove and replace the patch

pre-packaged mix w/o aggregate


L R/P No action none hot-applied sealant

T/E Seal cracks within patch cold-applied sealant

M R/P Repair distressed area

only Same as Patching, Small

Patching, Large and Utility Cut

R/P Remove and replace the patch conventional mix

T/E Remove and replace the patch


H R/P Remove and replace the

patch/slab conventional mix

T/E Remove and replace the patch


LEGEND:

N =

L = M = H =

No degree of severity Low Medium High

R =

P = T = E =

Recommended

Permanent Temporary Emergency

37

AC 150/5380-6B September 28, 2007

Table 6 - 5. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF RIGID PAVEMENT SURFACES – DISTORTION

PAVEMENT DISTRESS


MAINT./ REPAIR

TYPE



expandable foam injection

Pumping

L -M

Minimal movement R/P Base stabilization, slab

leveling, and saw cut cementitious grout pump under pressure through holes cored in pavement into void

Base stabilization, slab-expandable foam injection

H movement ≥ 1" (2.5 cm) R/P leveling, saw cut, and

install load transfer devices

cementitious grout pump under pressure through holes cored in pavement into void

L no movement R/P Micro-mill surface to true

and level none

Settlement or Faulting M -

H movement R/P Slabjacking

cementitious grout pump under pressure through holes cored in pavement into void expandable foam injection

LEGEND:



38

September 28, 2007 AC 150/5380-6B

Table 6 - 6. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF RIGID PAVEMENT SURFACES – LOSS OF SKID RESISTANCE

PAVEMENT DISTRESS


MAINT./ REPAIR

TYPE



Micro-mill entire surface none

Polished Aggregate N R/P

Diamond grind entire surface none

Grooving none HMA pavement overlay

Resurfacing thin bonded PCC overlay high-pressure water

Contaminants N R Surface Cleaning Biodegradable chemicals

LEGEND:



39

AC 150/5380-6B September 28, 2007

Table 6 - 7. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT SURFACES – CRACKING

PAVEMENT DISTRESS


MAINT./ REPAIR

TYPE

SUGGESTED MAINT./ REPAIR

METHOD


Longitudinal, Transverse, Block, or Reflection Cracking

L < 1/8"(3.2 mm) wide

R/P No action none

T/E Seal coat coal-tar pitch emulsion Slurry seal emulsified asphalt Fog coat emulsified asphalt

M

≥ 1/8" (3.2 mm) wide & < 1/4" (6.4 mm) wide

R/P Rout, clean and seal hot-applied sealant

cold-applied sealant

M

≥ 1/4" (6.4 mm) wide & < 3/4" (19 mm) wide

R/P Rout, clean and seal hot-applied sealant


H ≥ 3/4" (19 mm) wide & 1-1/4" (32 mm) wide

R/P

Pavement < 4" (102 mm) thick, remove and replace (i.e., saw/mill, remove existing pavement, repave and seal saw cuts)

State DOT modified surface mix *

Pavement ≥ 4" (102 mm) thick, remove and replace (i.e., mill, remove existing pavement, repave and seal saw cuts)


T/E Rout edges only, clean, and seal

hot-applied sealant cold-applied sealant

H

≥ 1-1/4" (32 mm) wide & 21/4" (57 mm) wide

R/P

Pavement < 4" (102 mm) thick, remove and replace


Pavement ≥ 4" (102 mm) thick, remove and replace


T/E Rout edges only, clean, install backer rod, and seal

hot-applied sealant


H ≥ 2-1/4" (57 mm) wide R/P

Pavement < 4" (102 mm) thick, remove and replace


40

September 28, 2007 AC 150/5380-6B

PAVEMENT DISTRESS


MAINT./ REPAIR

TYPE


METHOD


Pavement ≥ 4" (102 mm) thick, remove and replace


Alligator or Fatigue Cracking

N R/P Saw cut area, remove

and replace State DOT modified surface mix *

T/E Slurry seal emulsified asphalt Seal coat coal-tar pitch emulsion

R/P Remove and replace State DOT modified surface mix *

Slippage N T/E

Crack seal hot-applied cold-applied

Slurry seal emulsified asphalt

LEGEND:

N = No degree of severity

R = P =

Recommended Permanent

L = Low T = Temporary M = Medium E = Emergency

H = High

* - “State DOT modified surface mix” refers to a modified standard mix with a minimum of 5% retained on the 1/2-inch (12.7 mm) sieve and 0% passing the 3/4-inch (19 mm) sieve.

41

AC 150/5380-6B September 28, 2007

Table 6 - 8. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT SURFACES – DISINTEGRATION

PAVEMENT DISTRESS


MAINT./ REPAIR

TYPE


METHOD


R/P Saw cut area, remove and replace


Potholes N Prepare existing pothole, remove

hot-applied, polymer modified asphalt binder w/ aggregate

T/E loose loose material, fill and compact cold-applied, emulsified

asphalt w/ aggregate


N Small Area Seal coat coal-tar pitch emulsion T/E Slurry seal emulsified asphalt

Raveling and Weathering

Apply rejuvenator sealer-rejuvenator

R/P Overlay State DOT modified surface mix *

N FAA P-401

Large Area Seal coat coal-tar pitch emulsion

T/E Slurry seal emulsified asphalt Apply rejuvenator sealer-rejuvenator

Asphalt Stripping N R/P Remove to sound

pavement & replace State DOT modified surface mix *

R No action none Jet Blast Erosion N R/P Partial-depth patch State DOT modified

surface mix * T/E Apply rejuvenator sealer-rejuvenator

42

September 28, 2007 AC 150/5380-6B

PAVEMENT DISTRESS


MAINT./ REPAIR

TYPE


METHOD


L R/P No action none

Seal cracks hot-applied sealant cold-applied sealant

Patching and M

T/E Repair distressed area (small) only


Utility Cut Patch R/P Remove and replace

the patch

State DOT modified surface mix * FAA P-401

H R/P Remove and replace the patch


LEGEND:

N =

L = M =

H =


R = P = T = E =

Recommended Permanent Temporary Emergency

* - “State DOT modified surface mix” refers to a modified standard mix with a minimum of 5% retained on the 1/2-inch sieve and 100% passing the 3/4-inch sieve.

43

AC 150/5380-6B September 28, 2007

Table 6 - 9. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT SURFACES – DISTORTION

PAVEMENT DISTRESS


MAINT./ REPAIR

TYPE


METHOD



Rutting N T/E

Patch w/ elastomeric compound w/ aggregate

elastomeric compound w/ aggregate

Corrugation and Shoving N



Slurry seal emulsified asphalt T/E

Seal coat coal-tar pitch emulsion

Depression N R/P Remove and replace State DOT modified surface mix * FAA P-401



Swelling N FAA P-401

T/E Slurry seal emulsified asphalt Seal coat coal-tar pitch emulsion

LEGEND:

N =

L = M =

H =


R = P = T = E =

Recommended Permanent Temporary Emergency


44

September 28, 2007 AC 150/5380-6B

Table 6 - 10. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT SURFACES – LOSS OF SKID RESISTANCE

PAVEMENT DISTRESS


MAINT./ REPAIR

TYPE


METHOD


R/P Slurry seal emulsified asphalt

Polished Aggregate N

P

Micro-milling or diamond grinding none

Grooving none

Overlay State DOT modified surface mix * FAA P-401 high-pressure water

L R/P Clean surface Biodegradable chemicals

Contaminants M R/P Clean surface and apply coal-tar emulsion seal coat

coal-tar pitch emulsion

H R/P Remove and replace State DOT modified surface mix * FAA P-401

Scrap surface and blotter-sand-roll blotter sand

Bleeding N R/P Mill and repave


L - Isolated Areas

R/P Clean w/ application of biodegradable chemicals

Biodegradable chemicals

Fuel/Oil Spillage

M R/P

Clean and application of coal-tar emulsion seal coat

coal-tar pitch emulsion

H Areas of continuous spillage

R/P Remove and replace

State DOT modified surface mix * FAA P-401 conventional PCC mix

45

AC 150/5380-6B September 28, 2007

LEGEND:

N = No degree of severity

R = P =

Recommended Permanent

L = Low T = Temporary M = Medium E = Emergency

H = High


46

September 28, 2007 AC 150/5380-6B Appendix A

APPENDIX A. PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

An effective pavement maintenance management program specifies the procedures to be followed to assure that proper preventative and remedial pavement maintenance is performed. An airport sponsor may use any format it deems appropriate, but the program must, as a minimum, include the following:

A-1. Pavement Inventory. The following must be depicted in an appropriate form and level of detail:

a. Location of all runways, taxiways, and aprons

b. Dimensions

c. Type of pavement

d. Year of construction or most recent major rehabilitation

e. Whether Federal financial assistance was used to construct, reconstruct, or repair the pavement.

A-2. Inspection Schedule.

a. Detailed Inspection. Trained personnel must perform a detailed inspection of airfield pavements at least once a year. If a history of recorded pavement deterioration in the form of a Pavement Condition Index (PCI) survey as set forth in ASTM D 5340, Standard Test Method for Airport Pavement Condition Index Surveys, is available, the frequency of inspections may be extended to 3 years.

b. Drive-By Inspection. A drive-by inspection must occur a minimum of once per month to detect unexpected changes in the pavement condition.

A-3. Record Keeping. The airport must record and keep on file for a minimum of 5 years complete information about all detailed inspections and maintenance performed. The types of distress, their locations, and remedial action, scheduled or performed, must be documented. The minimum information to be recorded is listed below:

a. Inspection date

b. Location

c. Distress types

d. Maintenance scheduled or performed

For drive-by inspections, records must include the date of inspection and any maintenance performed.

A-4. Information Retrieval. An airport sponsor may use any form of record keeping it deems appropriate, so long as the information and records produced by the pavement survey can be retrieved as necessary for any reports required by the FAA.

A-5. Program Funding. The program should identify funding and other resources available to provide remedial and preventive maintenance activities.

47

AC 150/5380-6B September 28, 2007 Appendix A


48

September 28, 2007 AC 150/5380-6B Appendix B

APPENDIX B. GENERIC SPECIFICATIONS

(GENERIC SPECIFICATION #01)

ITEM M-361 HOT-APPLIED JOINT AND CRACK SEALANTS FOR RIGID (PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE) AND FLEXIBLE (BITUMINOUS) PAVEMENTS

DESCRIPTION

361-1.1 This item consists of providing and installing a resilient and adhesive [joint][crack] sealant, hot-applied, capable of effectively sealing [joints][cracks] in rigid (PCC) or flexible (bituminous) pavements. This item includes the removal of existing, loose, or damaged sealant material where applicable, preparation of the [joints][cracks], preparation of the sealant material, and the complete installation of the sealant repair system. The selection of sealant material products will be based on climate conditions, past performance of products, and at the discretion of the engineer.

MATERIALS

361-2.1 The repair material will be a hot-applied sealant conforming to the requirements of ASTM D 6690, as listed in Table 1, for the classification type specified below. The engineer will evaluate performance based on local conditions.

a. Type I – A joint and crack sealant capable of maintaining an effective seal in moderate climates. The material is tested for low temperature performance at -18°C (-64.4°F) using 50% extension.

b. Type II – A joint and crack sealant capable of maintaining an effective seal in most climates. The material is tested for low temperature performance at -29°C (-84.2°F) using 50% extension.

c. Type III – A joint and crack sealant capable of maintaining an effective seal in most climates. The material is tested for low temperature performance at -29°C (-84.2°F) using 50% extension. Special tests are included.

d. Type IV – A joint and crack sealant capable of maintaining an effective seal in climates experiencing very cold temperatures. The material is tested for low temperature performance at -29°C (-84.2°F) using 200% extension.

*************************************************************************************

The Engineer will select the materials to be used for the sealant and delete the paragraphs from 361-2.1a to 361-2.1.d that do not apply.

*************************************************************************************

49

5329

AC 150/5380-6B Appendix B

September 28, 2007

Table 1. Sealant Requirements per Classification Type

*

Cone Penetration at 25°C (77°F), per ASTM D *

Softening Point, °C (°F), per ASTM D 36 80 (176) minimum

Bond, non-immersed, per ASTM D 5329 *

Bond, water immersed, per ASTM D 5329 *

Resilience, %, per ASTM D 5329 *

Oven Aged Resilience, %, per ASTM D 5329 *

Asphalt Compatibility, per ASTM D 5329 PassB

A The development of at any time during the test procedure of a crack, separation, or other opening over 6mm (0.24 in) deep, in the sealant or between the sealant and the concrete block will constitute failure of the test specimen. The depth of crack, separation or other opening will be measured perpendicular to the side of the sealant showing the defect.

B There will be no failure in adhesion, formation of an oily exudate at the interface between the sealant and asphaltic concrete of other deleterious effects on the asphaltic concrete or sealant when tested at 60°C (140°F).

50


*************************************************************************************

The Engineer will specify the applicable sealant requirements. Asterisks denote insertion points.


Type I Type II Type III Type IV

Cone Penetration at 90 max 90 max 90 max 90-150 25°C (77°F) per ASTM D 5329

Softening Point °C 80 (176) 80 (176) 80 (176) 80 (176) (°F) per ASTM D 36, minimum

Bond, non-immersed per ASTM D 5329

Two out of three 25.4 mm specimens pass A

Three 12.7 mm specimens pass A

3 cycles at 50%


3 cycles at 50%


3 cycles at 5 cycles at 50% ext at -29°C ( ext at -29°C ( 200% ext at ext at -18°C ( 84.2°F) 84.2°F) 29°C (-84.2°F) 64.4°F)

Bond, water immersed per ASTM

-- -- Three 12.7 mm specimens pass A

--

D 5329 3 cycles at 50% ext at -29°C (84.2°F)

Resilience, % per -- 60 min 60 min 60 min ASTM D 5329

Oven Aged -- -- 60 min -- Resilience, % per ASTM D 5329

Asphalt Pass B Pass B Pass B Pass B

Compatibility per ASTM D 5329



*************************************************************************************

361-2.2 Heating of Materials. The hot-applied sealant will be heated in conformance with ASTM D 5167, Standard Practice for Melting of Hot-Applied Joint and Crack Sealant and Filler for Evaluation.

51

AC 150/5380-6B September 28, 2007 Appendix B

CONSTRUCTION METHODS

361-3.1 Time of Application. [Joints][Cracks] will be sealed as soon after completion of the pavement preparation as feasible and preferably before the pavement is opened to traffic, including construction equipment. The pavement temperature must be above 50°F (10°C) at the time of installation of the hot-applied [joint][crack] sealing material.

361-3.2 Preparation of Joints in Rigid Pavements

a. Removal of Existing Joint Sealant. All existing joint sealants will be removed by routing / plowing. Any remaining sealant / debris will be removed by use of wire brushes or other tools as necessary. In some instances, re-sawing the joints may be required. This is only recommended in areas where the existing joint faces cannot be thoroughly cleaned to satisfactorily promote the effectiveness and adherence of the new sealant. If re-sawing the joints is required, immediately after sawing, the resulting slurry will be completely removed from the joint and adjacent area by flushing with a jet of water, and by use of other tools as necessary. The joints will be allowed sufficient time to dry prior to re-sealing. The joint reservoir width to depth ratio should be as close to 1:1 as practical when re-sawing is required. The use of backer material is recommended to obtain the desired ratio at the reservoir or as recommended by the sealant manufacturer.

b. Sealing. Immediately before sealing, the joints will be thoroughly cleaned of all remaining laitance, curing compound, and other foreign material. Cleaning will be accomplished by sandblasting. Sandblasting will be accomplished in a minimum of two passes. One pass per joint face with the nozzle held at an angle directly toward the joint face and not more that 3 inches from it. Upon completion of cleaning, the joints will be blown out with compressed air free of oil and water. Only air compressors with operable oil and water traps will be used to prepare the joints for sealing. The joint faces will be surface dry when the seal is applied. The surface of the installed sealant material will be 1/4-inch to 3/8inch below the existing pavement surface.

361-3.3 Preparation of Joints in Flexible Pavements

a. Removal of Existing Joint Sealant. All existing joint sealants will be removed by routing / plowing. Any remaining sealant / debris will be removed by use of a hot lance and compressed air free of oil and water. In some instances, re-sawing the joints may be required. This is only recommended in areas where the existing joint faces cannot be thoroughly cleaned to satisfactorily promote the effectiveness and adherence of the new sealant. If re-sawing the joints is required, immediately after sawing, the joint faces will be cleaned by use of a hot lance and compressed air free of oil and water. If wet sawing equipment is used, the joints will be allowed sufficient time to dry following preparation and prior to re-sealing. The joint reservoir width to depth ratio should be as close to 1:1 as practical when re-sawing is required. The use of backer material is recommended to obtain the desired ratio at the reservoir or as recommended by the sealant manufacturer.

b. Sealing. Immediately before sealing, the joints will be thoroughly cleaned of all remaining laitance and other foreign material. Cleaning will be accomplished by use of a hot lance. Upon completion of cleaning, the joints will be blown out with compressed air free of oil and water. Only air compressors with operable oil and water traps will be used to prepare the joints for sealing. The joint faces will be surface dry when the seal is applied. The surface of the installed sealant material will be 1/4-inch to 3/8-inch below the existing pavement surface.

52


361-3.4 Preparation of Cracks in Rigid Pavements

a. Sawing. All cracks will be cleaned of any debris or laitance by use of wire brushes or other tools as necessary. In some instances, sawing the cracks may be required. If sawing the joints is required, immediately after sawing, the resulting slurry will be completely removed from the crack and adjacent area by flushing with a jet of water, and by use of other tools as necessary. The crack will be allowed sufficient time to dry prior to sealing. When sawing cracks, the reservoir ratio should be 1:1 with a 3/8-inch minimum width recommended.

b. Sealing. Immediately before sealing, the cracks will be thoroughly cleaned of all remaining laitance, curing compound, and other foreign material. Cleaning will be accomplished by sandblasting. Sandblasting will be accomplished in a minimum of two passes. One pass per crack face with the nozzle held at an angle directly toward the crack face and not more that 3 inches from it. Upon completion of cleaning, the cracks will be blown out with compressed air free of oil and water. Only air compressors with operable oil and water traps will be used to prepare the cracks for sealing. The crack faces will be surface dry when the seal is applied. The surface of the installed sealant material will be 1/4-inch to 3/8inch below the existing pavement surface.

361-3.5 Preparation of Cracks in Flexible Pavements

a. Sawing / Routing. All cracks will be cleaned of any debris or laitance by use of a hot lance and compressed air free of oil and water. In some instances, sawing or routing the cracks may be required. If sawing/routing the cracks is required, immediately after sawing/routing, the resulting debris will be completely removed from the crack and adjacent area by a hot lance and compressed air free of oil and water, and by use of other tools as necessary. The crack will be allowed sufficient time to dry prior to sealing. When sawing/routing cracks, the reservoir ratio should be 1:1 with a 3/8-inch minimum width recommended.

b. Sealing. Immediately before sealing, the cracks will be thoroughly cleaned of all remaining laitance and other foreign material. Cleaning will be accomplished by use of a hot lance. Upon completion of cleaning, the cracks will be blown out with compressed air free of oil and water. Only air compressors with operable oil and water traps will be used to prepare the cracks for sealing. The crack faces will be surface dry when the seal is applied. The surface of the installed sealant material will be 1/4-inch to 3/8-inch below the existing pavement surface.

*************************************************************************************

Delete the paragraphs from 361-3.2 to 361-3.5 that do not apply.

*************************************************************************************

361-3.6 INSTALLATION OF SEALANTS. [Joints][Cracks] will be inspected for proper width, depth, alignment, and preparation, and will be approved by the Engineer before sealing is allowed. Sealants will be installed in accordance with the following requirements:

a. Hot Poured Sealants. The [joint][crack] sealant will be applied uniformly solid from bottom to top and will be filled without formation of entrapped air or voids. The sealant surface when complete will be 1/4-inch and 3/8-inch below existing pavement surface. A backing material will be placed to obtain the desired width to depth ratio and will be both non-reactive and non-adhesive to the pavement or the sealant material. The heating kettle will be an indirect heating type, constructed as a double boiler. A positive temperature control and mechanical agitation will be provided. The sealant will not be heated to

53


more than 20°F (-11°C) below the safe heating temperature. The safe heating temperature can be obtained from the manufacturer’s shipping container. A direct connecting pressure type extruding device with nozzles shaped for insertion into the joint will be provided. Any sealant spilled on the surface of the pavement, structures and/or lighting fixtures will be removed immediately.

b. Backer Rod Material. The use of a backer rod material or bond breaker in the bottom of the [joint][crack] to be filled is recommended to control the depth of the sealant, to achieve the desired shape factor, reservoir width to depth ration, and to support the sealant against indentation and sag. Backer rod materials and bond breakers should be compatible with the sealant, should not adhere to the sealant, should be compressible without extruding the sealant, and should recover to maintain contact with the [joint][crack] faces when the [joint][crack] is open. The backer rod will be 25 percent larger in diameter than the width of the reservoir.

METHOD OF MEASUREMENT

361-4.1 The sealant material will be measured by the [gallon (liter)][pound (kg)][linear foot (meter)][square yard (square meter)][lump sum] of sealant in place, completed, and accepted.

BASIS OF PAYMENT

361-5.1 Payment for sealing material will be made at the contract unit price bid per [gallon (liter)][pound (kg)][linear foot (meter)][square yard (square meter)][lump sum]. This price will be full compensation for furnishing all materials, for all preparation, delivering, and placing of these materials, and for all labor, equipment, tools, and incidentals necessary to complete the item.

Payment will be made under:

Item M-361-5.1 [Joint][Crack] Sealant – per [gallon (liter)][pound (kg)][linear foot (meter)][square yard (square meter)][lump sum]

TESTING REQUIREMENTS

ASTM D 36 Standard Test Method for Softening Point of Bitumen (Ring-and-Ball Apparatus)

ASTM D 5167 Standard Practice for Melting of Hot-Applied Joint and Crack Sealant and Filler for Evaluation

MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS

ASTM D 6690 Standard Specification for Joint and Crack Sealants, Hot Applied, for Concrete and Asphalt Pavements

END ITEM M-361

54



ITEM M-362 SILICONE JOINT AND CRACK SEALANTS FOR RIGID (PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE) AND FLEXIBLE (BITUMINOUS) PAVEMENTS

DESCRIPTION

362-1.1 This specification includes the crack sealing and the repair and replacement of existing joint sealants in both flexible (bituminous) and rigid (PCC) pavements using a self-leveling silicone sealant. The items include the removal of existing joint materials, preparation of cracks and joints, and the installation of sealant in the cracks and joints. For flexible pavements, the use of a silicone sealant is restricted to edge joints between flexible and rigid pavements only. Silicone should not be used to seal flexible pavement to flexible pavement joints.

MATERIALS

362-2.1 The sealant for crack repair and joint replacement will be a one-part silicone material formulation capable of being applied with a pressure applicator. The sealant will be a self-leveling, nonacid producing and cure on exposure to air.

362-2.2 Backer Rod Material. The backer rod will be compatible with the sealant. The backer rod will be non-reactive and non-adhesive with the pavement or the sealant. The backer rod will conform to the requirements of ASTM D 5249.

362-2.3 Sealant Material. The sealant will be a low modulus type, as stated by the manufacturer, and meet the following requirements of ASTM D 5893:

Physical Requirements ASTM D 5893 Requirements

Cure Evaluation Pass at 21 days

Extrusion Rate (ASTM C 1183) Type S, 50 ml/min. minimum

Tack Free Time (ASTM C 679) 5 hr. maximum

Hardness (ASTM C 661)

-29°C (-20°F), Type A2 25 max.

23°C (73°F), Type 00 30 min.

Rubber Properties in Tension

Ultimate Elongation 600% minimum

Stress at 150% Elongation 310 K pa (45 psi) max.

Resilience 75% minimum

362-2.4 Preparation of Materials. No preparation of materials required.


362-3.1 Time of Application. [Joints][Cracks] will be sealed as soon after completion of the pavement preparation as feasible and preferably before the pavement is opened to traffic, including construction

55


equipment. The pavement temperature must be above 40°F (4°C) at the time of installation of the cold-applied [joint][crack] sealing material. For new rigid pavement, manufacturers may recommend waiting a period of 3 weeks for curing prior to sealant application.

362-3.2 Preparation of Joints in Rigid Pavements

a. Removal of Existing Joint Sealant. All existing joint sealants will be removed by plowing or use of hand tools. Any remaining sealant / debris will be removed by use of wire brushes or other tools as necessary. In some instances, re-sawing the joints may be required. This is only recommended in areas where the existing joint faces cannot be thoroughly cleaned to satisfactorily promote the effectiveness and adherence of the new sealant. If re-sawing the joints is required, immediately after sawing, the resulting slurry will be completely removed from the joint and adjacent area by flushing with a jet of water, and by use of other tools as necessary. The joints will be allowed sufficient time to dry prior to re-sealing. The joint reservoir width to depth ratio should be as close to 2:1 as practical, with a minimum width of 3/8 inches preferred, when re-sawing is required. The use of backer material is recommended to obtain the desired ratio at the reservoir or as recommended by the sealant manufacturer.

b. Sealing. Immediately before sealing, the joints will be thoroughly cleaned of all remaining laitance and other foreign material. Cleaning will be accomplished by sandblasting. Sandblasting will be accomplished in a minimum of two passes. One pass per joint face with the nozzle held at an angle directly toward the joint face and not more that 3 inches from it. Upon completion of cleaning, the joints will be blown out with compressed air free of oil and water. Only air compressors with operable oil and water traps will be used to prepare the joints for sealing. The joint faces will be surface dry when the seal is applied. The surface of the installed sealant material will be 1/4-inch to 3/8-inch below the existing pavement surface.


a. Removal of Existing Joint Sealant. All existing joint sealants will be removed by routing. Any remaining sealant / debris will be removed by use of a hot lance and compressed air free of oil and water. In some instances, re-sawing the joints may be required. This is only recommended in areas where the existing joint faces cannot be thoroughly cleaned to satisfactorily promote the effectiveness and adherence of the new sealant. If re-sawing the existing joints is required, immediately after sawing, the joint faces will be cleaned by use of a hot lance and compressed air free of oil and water. The joint reservoir width to depth ratio should be as close to 2:1 as practical, with a minimum width of 3/8 inches preferred, when re-sawing is required. The use of backer material is recommended to obtain the desired ratio at the reservoir or as recommended by the sealant manufacturer.

b. Sealing. Immediately before sealing, the joints will be thoroughly cleaned of all remaining laitance and other foreign material. Cleaning will be accomplished by use of a hot lance. Upon completion of cleaning, the joints will be blown out with compressed air free of oil and water. Only air compressors with operable oil and water traps will be used to prepare the joints for sealing. The joint faces will be allowed to cool to the ambient temperature and will be surface dry when the seal is applied. The surface of the installed sealant material will be 1/4-inch to 3/8-inch below the existing pavement surface.

362-3.4 Preparation of Cracks in Rigid Pavements

a. Sawing. All cracks will be cleaned of any debris or laitance by use of wire brushes or other tools as necessary. In some instances, sawing the cracks may be required. If sawing the cracks is required, immediately after sawing, the resulting slurry will be completely removed from the crack and

56


adjacent area by flushing with a jet of water, and by use of other tools as necessary. The crack will be allowed sufficient time to dry prior to sealing. When sawing cracks, the reservoir ratio should be 2:1 with a 3/8-inch minimum width recommended.

b. Sealing. Immediately before sealing, the cracks will be thoroughly cleaned of all remaining laitance and other foreign material. Cleaning will be accomplished by sandblasting. Sandblasting will be accomplished in a minimum of two passes. One pass per crack face with the nozzle held at an angle directly toward the crack face and not more that 3 inches from it. Upon completion of cleaning, the cracks will be blown out with compressed air free of oil and water. Only air compressors with operable oil and water traps will be used to prepare the cracks for sealing. The crack faces will be surface dry when the seal is applied. The surface of the installed sealant material will be 1/4-inch to 3/8-inch below the existing pavement surface.


a. Routing. All cracks will be cleaned of any debris or laitance by use of a hot lance and compressed air free of oil and water. In some instances, routing the cracks may be required. If routing the cracks is required, immediately after routing, the resulting debris will be completely removed from the crack and adjacent area by a hot lance and compressed air free of oil and water, and by use of other tools as necessary. The crack will be allowed sufficient time to dry prior to sealing. When routing cracks, the reservoir ratio should be 2:1 with a 3/8-inch minimum width recommended.

b. Sealing. Immediately before sealing, the cracks will be thoroughly cleaned of all remaining dust and debris. Cleaning will be accomplished by use of a hot lance. Upon completion of cleaning, the cracks will be blown out with compressed air free of oil and water. Only air compressors with operable oil and water traps will be used to prepare the cracks for sealing. The joint faces will be allowed to cool to the ambient temperature and will be surface dry when the seal is applied. The surface of the installed sealant material will be 1/4-inch to 3/8-inch below the existing pavement surface.

*************************************************************************************

Delete the paragraphs from 362-3.2 to 362-3.5 that do not apply.

*************************************************************************************

362-3.6 INSTALLATION OF SEALANTS. [Joints][Cracks] will be inspected for proper width, depth, and preparation, and will be approved by the Engineer before sealing is allowed. Sealants will be installed in accordance with the following requirements:

a. Silicone Sealants. The [joint][crack] sealant will be applied uniformly solid from bottom to top and will be filled without formation of entrapped air or voids. Backing rod material will be placed as per sealant manufacturer’s requirements and will be both non-reactive and non-adhesive to the pavement and the sealant material. A direct connecting pressure type extruding device with nozzles shaped for insertion into the joint will be provided. Any sealant spilled on the surface of the pavement, structures and/or lighting fixtures will be removed immediately.

b. Backer Rod Material. The use of backer rod material or bond breaker in the bottom of the [joint][crack] to be filled is recommended to control the depth of the sealant, to achieve the desired shape factor, and to support the sealant against indentation and sag. Backer rod materials and bond breakers should be compatible with the sealant, should not adhere to the sealant, should be compressible without extruding the sealant, and should recover to maintain contact with the [joint][crack] faces when the

57


[joint][crack] is open. The backer rod will be 25 percent larger in diameter than the width of the reservoir.


362-4.1 The sealant material will be measured by the [gallon (liter)][pound (kg)][linear foot (meter)][lump sum] of sealant in place, completed, and accepted.

BASIS OF PAYMENT

362-5.1 Payment for sealing material will be made at the contract unit price bid per [gallon (liter)][pound (kg)][linear foot (meter)][lump sum]. This price will be full compensation for furnishing all materials, for all preparation, delivering, and placing of these materials, and for all labor, equipment, tools, and incidentals necessary to complete the item.


Item M-362-5.1 [Joint][Crack] Sealant – per [gallon (liter)][pound (kg)][linear foot (meter)][lump sum]


ASTM C 661 Standard Test Method for Indentation Hardness of Elastomeric-Type Sealants by Means of a Durometer

ASTM C 679 Standard Test Method for Tack-Free Time of Elastomeric Sealants

ASTM C 1183 Standard Test Method for Extrusion Rate of Elastomeric Sealants


ASTM D 5249 Standard Specification for Backer Material for Use with Cold- and Hot-Applied Joint Sealants in Portland Cement Concrete and Asphalt Joints

ASTM D 5893 Standard Specification for Cold Applied, Single Component, Chemically Curing Silicone Joint Sealant for Portland Cement Concrete Pavements

END ITEM M-362

58



ITEM M-363 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REPAIR FOR PATCHING FLEXIBLE (BITUMINOUS) PAVEMENTS AND TEMPORARY REPAIRS TO RIGID (PORTLAND

CEMENT CONCRETE) PAVEMENTS

DESCRIPTION

363-1.1 This specification provides a general guidance for the selection of bituminous materials to be used for the repair and patching of existing bituminous pavements that have been evaluated and identified through the Airport Pavement Management System (APMS) for removal and replacement action due to the type of existing distress identified. This material specification also addresses the temporary repair patches to PCC pavements using bituminous pavement. This material specification should be used when the standard 1/2-inch maximum aggregate size P-401 bituminous surface course is not readily available or is impractical to obtain in small quantities for patching. The patching bituminous pavement will be composed of mineral aggregate, mineral fillers and bituminous binder material mixed in a central mixing plant and generally conforming to the [insert state] Department of Transportation specifications for asphalt pavements.

MATERIALS

363-2.1 Aggregates. The maximum size for coarse aggregate in the mix should be 1/2-inch (12.5mm) for patches less than 2 inches in depth, and 3/4-inch (19mm) for patches 2 inches in depth or greater. The fine and coarse aggregate properties should conform to the DOT’s material requirements based on plant job mixture formulas for the particular supplier’s plant.

363-2.2 Bituminous Binder. The asphalt binder material will be chosen based on the project’s geographical location and local climate conditions and approved by the State DOT for use within the different regions of the state.

363-2.3 Composition and Compaction Testing of Materials. The bituminous pavement will be considered acceptable for use where plant inspection is maintained by the State DOT and production samples are taken on a regular basis for conformance with State DOT standards based on the approved job mixture formula. For example, plants that have approved state DOT Superpave (SUperior PERforming Asphalt PAVEments) systems for 1/2-inch (12.5mm) and 3/4-inch (19mm) would be considered acceptable job mix formulas. The compaction of the mixture for large areas of repair patches that are machine placed should be tested in the field for density. The use of a Nuclear Density Gauge to monitor compaction efforts should be considered for paving in excess of 100 tons. The standard for acceptance testing is dependent on the minimum [insert state] compaction requirements for the specified mix based on the theoretical maximum densities (TMD) and/or the Marshal mix design method, whichever is applicable to the [insert state] standards.


363-3.1 General. The amount of bituminous pavement required to complete the work area patches should be ordered for arrival to the site based on the methods to be used for placement. The temperature of the mix should be within the binder manufacturer’s recommended range for mixing and compaction. The size of the repairs should determine which placement method will be utilized. There are two methods of spreading and finishing the mixture. Hand spreading and finishing is commonly used for small patches and trench style repairs. Conventional small scale pavers and rollers should be used whenever the repair areas are large and of such a size and number that this equipment is effective.

59


363-3.2 Repair of Bituminous Pavements. The repair for bituminous pavement includes the following procedures.

a. Full-depth Repair of Bituminous Pavement and Base Course. Remove the surface and base as deep as necessary to reach a firm foundation. In some cases, a portion of the subgrade may also have to be removed. Saw cut the existing bituminous pavement making vertical square or rectangular cuts through the pavement. Replace the base material with material equal to that removed; however, if the base material has proved problematic, replace it with a more appropriate material. Compact each layer placed. Apply a tack coat, conforming to FAA specification P-603, to the vertical faces of the existing pavement. Place bituminous concrete and compact. If necessary, saw and seal the joints around the perimeter of the patch area.

b. Full-depth Repair of Bituminous Pavement. Saw cut and remove the affected area, at least 1 foot into the surrounding pavement. Make the saw cut faces straight and vertical. Compact and reshape base material as needed. Apply a light tack coat, conforming to FAA specification P-603, to the vertical faces of the existing pavement and to the existing base. Place bituminous material in the cutout area in lifts not to exceed 2 inches, compacted depth. Continue with subsequent lifts until the bituminous patch meets the existing grade of the surrounding pavement. Continue to compact the bituminous mixture with rollers suitable for the size of the repair area, until the surface is the same elevation as the surrounding pavement. If necessary, saw and seal the joints around the perimeter of the patch area.

c. Partial-depth Repair of Bituminous Pavements. Mill the identified area to provide a vertical face around the edge. The FAA recommends a minimum patch depth of 2 inches. Thoroughly clean the entire area. Apply a light tack coat, conforming to FAA specification P-603, to the area including the vertical face of the patch area. Spread the bituminous pavement in the prepared area to bring it to original grade when compacted. Deeper patches may require multiply lifts to allow proper compaction of each lift. Thoroughly compact the bituminous patch material with a roller or vibratory plate compactor.

363-3.3 Temporary Repair of PCC Pavements. The partial-depth repair of PCC pavements will include the following procedures. Make a vertical cut with a concrete saw 2 inches in depth and approximately 2 inches outside of the affected area. Remove all unsound concrete until sound, intact material has been reached (into at least 1/2-inch of visually sound concrete). The unsound pavement may be removed by means of milling 2-3 inches in depth. Remove the unsound concrete material with suitable hand tools such as air hammers, pneumatic drills, electric impact hammers, or grinding equipment and blow out the area with oil-free compressed air. Clean the area to be repaired with high-pressure water. Allow the patch area to dry completely. Treat the surface (all sides and bottom, except any joint face) with tack coat, conforming to FAA specification P-603, to ensure a good bond between the existing PCC pavement and the new bituminous pavement. Apply the tack coat before placing the bituminous patch. Place the bituminous concrete in layers not exceeding 2 inches. Compact each layer with a vibratory-plate compactor, roller, hand tampers, or mechanical rammers. If the repair crosses or abuts a working joint, saw and seal the joint as soon as possible after placement of the bituminous patch has cooled.


363-4.1 The bituminous repairs will be measured by the [square foot (square meter)][square yard (square meter)] of material installed or area repaired.

60


BASIS OF PAYMENT

363-5.1 Payment for bituminous repairs will be made at the contract unit price bid per [square foot (square meter)][square yard (square meter)]. This price will be full compensation for furnishing all materials, for all preparation, delivering, and placing of these materials, and for all labor, equipment, tools, and incidentals necessary to complete the item.


Item M-363-5.1 Bituminous Pavement Repair – per [square foot (square meter)][square yard (square meter)]


ASTM D 2950 Standard Test Method for Density of Bituminous Concrete in Place by Nuclear Methods

END ITEM M-363

61



ITEM P-M-461 HOT-APPLIED CRACK SEALANTS/FILLERS WITH FIBERS FOR FLEXIBLE (HOT-MIX ASPHALT) PAVEMENT OVERLAYS

DESCRIPTION

461-1.1 This work consists of milling, saw cutting, reshaping, cleaning, filling, repairing and reconstructing cracked flexible (Hot-Mix Asphalt) pavements in preparation of overlays, including the application of a stress absorbing membrane over the crack, as required, and installing pavement patches where necessary, in accordance with this specification and where directed by the Engineer. This specification is applicable to cracks wider than 1/4-inch.

a. Classification of Crack Repair. The various types of cracks and repairs are further classified as follows:

(1) Type 1 Crack Repair – Fiber Modified Crack Sealer. Applying the hot pumped asphalt crack filler containing polyester fibers will be as directed by the Engineer. Crack sealing should be flush to existing surface where practicable and any overband material should be as thin as practical and no more than 2 inches wide. An applicator shoe of appropriate size should be used. This method applies to cracks 1/4-inch to 1-inch wide.

(2) Type 2A Crack Repair – Mill and Inlay Repair for Cracks Greater Than 1-inch Wide. For pavements 5 inches or greater in depth, remove pavement by milling to a depth of 3 inches and a width of 24 inches, shape, clean, dry and fill crack with fiber-reinforced crack sealer, install a minimum 12-inch wide (minimum width is dependent on the manufacturer’s recommendations) stress absorbing membrane centered over the crack, tack coat, install Hot-Mix Asphalt (HMA) pavement patch, tack coat surface, and overlay as required. The use of a stress absorbing membrane may be eliminated based on the engineer’s evaluation of pavement conditions.

(3) Type 2B Crack Repair – Mill and Inlay Repair for Cracks Greater Than 1-inch Wide. For pavements less than 5 inches in depth, remove pavement by milling or saw cutting full-depth and a width of 24 inches. Compact base course, tack coat bottom and sides of trench, install HMA pavement patch, tack coat surface, and overlay as required.

MATERIALS

461-2.1 MEMBRANE. Stress absorbing membrane will conform to the following requirements:

Property Value Test Method

Thickness, in 0.135 (minimum) ASTM D 1777

Strip tensile, lbs/in 60 (minimum) ASTM D 882 (modified)

Puncture resistance, lbs 215 ASTM E 154

Permanence, Perms 0.01 (maximum) ASTM E 96, Method B

Pliability – 1/4 inch Mandrel No cracks in fabric or rubberized asphalt, 32°F (0°C)

ASTM D 146 (modified)

62


Primer will be compatible with membrane and will be supplied by membrane manufacturer.

*************************************************************************************

If the engineer elects not to include a stress absorbing membrane, delete paragraph 461-2.1.

*************************************************************************************

461-2.2 HMA PATCHING PAVEMENT. Bituminous pavement will conform to the requirements of the specified HMA for patching material as specified in generic specification Item M-363, Bituminous Pavement Repair for Patching Flexible (Bituminous) Pavements and Temporary Repairs to Rigid (Portland Cement Concrete) Pavements.

461-2.3 HMA PAVEMENT FOR OVERLAYS. The use of FAA Item P-401, Bituminous Surface Course, is recommended for overlay material. [insert state] Department of Transportation (DOT) approved HMA mixes may be used on a case by case basis for overlays where conditions warrant.

461-2.4 TACK COAT. Tack coat will conform to the requirements of ASTM D 2397, Type RS-1 or RS-1h. In addition, tack coat will also conform to the requirements of FAA specification P-603, Bituminous Tack Coat, if required.

461-2.5 FIBER REINFORCED ASPHALT CRACK SEALER MATERIAL. Fiber reinforced asphalt crack sealer materials will be short-length polyester fibers having the following properties:

Length 7 mm Diameter 0.008 inch, plus or minus 0.001 inch Specific Gravity, ASTM D 792 1.32 to 1.40 Melt Temperature, ASTM D 3418 480°F minimum

Ignition Temperature 1000°F minimum Tensile Strength, ASTM D 2256 75,000 PSI, plus or minus 5,000 PSI Break Elongation, ASTM D 2256 33%, plus or minus 9% when they are fully

drawn

a. Asphalt Fiber Compound. Asphalt Fiber compound will be mixed at a rate of 6-8% fiber weight to weight of asphalt cement.

b. Asphalt Binder. The asphalt binder will consist of a blend of neat asphalt binder and chemically modified crumb rubber (CMCR) or other approved polymer modifiers that meet the following specifications:

(1) PG 64-XX or PG 70-XX after modification.

(2) Viscosity of not more than 3 PaS at 300°F.

(3) Modification at a minimum will consist of 5% CMCR and the maximum particle size for the CMCR will be 80 mesh (#80 sieve).

(4) The performance grade of the neat asphalt binder will not exceed a PG 58-XX.

(5) The asphalt supplier will provide testing for the neat asphalt binder and modified asphalt binder in accordance with AASHTO M 320.

63



461-3.1 WEATHER LIMITATIONS. No crack repair material will be applied in wet cracks, or where frost, snow or ice is present, or when the ambient temperature is below 40°F (4°C).

461-3.2 TIME LIMITATIONS. The Contractor will schedule his operations so that all crack filling and pavement repair will be performed within the schedules identified by the Engineer.

461-3.3 EQUIPMENT. Equipment used in the performance of the work will be subject to the approval of the Engineer and maintained in satisfactory working condition at all times.

Air compressor will be portable and capable of furnishing not less than 100 cubic feet of air per minute at not less than 90 pounds per square inch pressure at the nozzle. The compressors will be equipped with traps that will maintain the compressed air free of oil and water.

Manually operated, gas powered air-broom or self-propelled vacuum sweeper designed especially for use in cleaning pavements will be used to remove debris, dirt and dust from routed cracks. Hand sweeping and cleanup of debris, dirt, and dust may be used on small areas.

Hand tools consist of brooms, shovels, metal bars with chisel-shaped ends, and any other tools that may be satisfactorily used to accomplish the work.

The melting kettle used to melt the crack sealing compound will be a double boiler, indirect fired type. The space between the inner and outer shells will be filled with a suitable heat transfer oil or substitute having a flash point of not less than 600°F. The kettle will be equipped with a satisfactory means of agitating the crack sealer at all times. This may be accomplished by continuous stirring with mechanically operated paddles and/or by a continuous circulating gear pump attached to the heating unit. The kettle will be equipped with thermostatic control calibrated between 200 and 550°F (93 and 288°C).

Equipment for blowing clean, drying and rejuvenating sidewall of cracks will be a propane torch unit which operates at 3,000°F and gas velocity 3000 feet per second.

461-3.4 TYPE 1 CRACK REPAIR - FIBER MODIFIED CRACK SEALER. All cracks will be blown clean by high pressure air. All loose material and other material will be removed from the cracks and from the pavement surfaces. The cracks will be sterilized by use of propane torch to eliminate all vegetation, moisture and dirt.

No crack sealing material will be applied in wet cracks or where frost snow or ice is present nor when the ambient temperature is below 40°F (4°C).

Joint sealing material will be heated and applied at a temperature specified by the manufacturer and approved by the Engineer. Minimum application temperature will be 320°F.

Sealer will be delivered to the pavement surface through a pressure hose line and applicator shoe, size as specified.

All cracks will be sealed as specified herein, and the sealer will be well bonded to the pavement. A well bonded sealant cannot be readily pulled from the pavement by hand. For Type 1, cracks will be completely filled flush with the surface of the pavement. More than one application of crack sealer may

64


be necessary to fill cracks to required level. Any overband material will be kept to a minimum thickness of 1/8-inch or less and a minimum 2-inch width. Overbands will be rolled with a steel-wheel 1- or 2-ton roller to set the material while hot. Excess or spilled sealer will be removed from the pavement by approved methods and discarded.

461-3.5 TYPE 2A CRACK REPAIR – MILL AND INLAY REPAIR FOR CRACKS GREATER THAN 1-INCH WIDE. Type 2A crack repair for all cracks greater than 1-inch wide will include removing the existing pavement to a minimum depth of 3 inches and a minimum width of 24 inches, or as directed by the engineer, symmetrical about the centerline of the crack by milling. Prepare and fill crack using sealer and membrane treatment, tack coat bottom and sides of trench, place and compact HMA patch.

All milled pavement material will be legally disposed of offsite. Locations of cracks to be repaired will be located in the field by the Engineer.

A HMA pavement patch will be installed and compacted to a minimum density defined in the State DOT or FAA P-401 specification when tested with a nuclear gauge. The patch will closely match the adjacent pavement grade. The tack coat and HMA patch pavement will be as specified in paragraphs 461-2.4 and 461-2.2. The Engineer may elect not to use a stress absorbing membrane based on evaluation of pavement conditions.

*************************************************************************************

If the engineer elects not to use a stress absorbing membrane, revise paragraph 461-3.5 to read:

“461-3.5 TYPE 2A CRACK REPAIR – MILL AND INLAY REPAIR FOR CRACKS GREATER THAN 1-INCH WIDE. Type 2A crack repair for all cracks greater than 1-inch wide will include removing the existing pavement to a minimum depth of 3 inches and a minimum width of 24 inches, or as directed by the engineer, symmetrical about the centerline of the crack by milling. Prepare and fill crack using sealer treatment, tack coat bottom and sides of trench, place and compact HMA patch.

All milled pavement material will be legally disposed of offsite. Locations of cracks to be repaired will be located in the field by the Engineer.

A HMA pavement patch will be installed and compacted to a minimum density defined in the State DOT or FAA P-401 specification when tested with a nuclear gauge. The patch will closely match the adjacent pavement grade. The tack coat and HMA patch pavement will be as specified in paragraphs 461-2.4 and 461-2.2.”

*************************************************************************************

461-3.6 TYPE 2B CRACK REPAIR – MILL AND INLAY REPAIR FOR CRACKS GREATER THAN 1-INCH WIDE. Type 2B crack repair for all cracks greater than 1-inch wide will include removing the existing pavement by milling or saw cutting full-depth and a minimum width of 24 inches, symmetrical about the centerline of the crack. Compact base course, tack coat bottom and sides of trench, install HMA pavement patch, tack coat surface, and overlay as required.

All milled or removed pavement material will be legally disposed of offsite. Locations of cracks to be repaired will be located in the field by the Engineer.

65


A HMA pavement patch will be installed and compacted to a minimum density defined in the State DOT or FAA P-401 specification when tested with a nuclear gauge. The patch will closely match the adjacent pavement grade. The tack coat and HMA patch pavement will be as specified in paragraphs 461-2.4 and 461-2.2. The Engineer may elect not to use a stress absorbing membrane based on evaluation of pavement conditions.

461-3.7 STRESS ABSORBING MEMBRANE. Membrane will be installed after crack filling or as specified herein. The pavement surface will be thoroughly cleaned and dried and will be prepared in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions prior to placement of the membrane.

The membrane will be installed in minimum widths of 12 inches and a maximum of 20 inches and will be centered over the crack within a two-inch tolerance.

The membrane will be installed straight and wrinkle-free with no curled or uplifted edges. Any wrinkles over 3/8 inches in width will be slit and folded down. Manufacturer’s requirements for tacking or self-bonding of the membrane will be strictly followed. After the membrane has been placed, it will be pressed against the asphalt surface by means of a hand roller or other suitable equipment to insure proper bonding. Special attention should be given to insure that the edges and corners of the strips are bonded securely to the surface. Any strips with loose edges or corners should be re-bonded or replaced prior to placement of the HMA patch at the expense of the Contractor.

All membrane will be surface dry before placement of the HMA patch.

*************************************************************************************

If the engineer elects to include a stress absorbing membrane, revise paragraph 461-3.7 to read:

“461-3.7 STRESS ABSORBING MEMBRANE. Not used.”

*************************************************************************************

461-3.8 MILLING. Milling as required will conform to industry standards.

461-3.9 CERTIFICATION. Manufacturer’s certificates of all materials used will be required for the following materials:

a. Stress absorbing membrane

b. HMA pavement (aggregate, asphalt, etc)

c. Tack coat

d. Fiber reinforced crack sealer (asphalt fiber compound, asphalt binder, etc)

66



461-4.1 CRACK REPAIR – TYPES 1, 2A AND 2B. The quantities of crack repair for Types 1, 2A, and 2B to be paid for will be the number of linear feet (meters) of crack repair, of the type specified, measured in place, completed and accepted by the Engineer.

461-4.2 STRESS ABSORBING MEMBRANE, INSTALLED. The quantity of stress absorbing membrane to be paid for will be the number of linear feet (meters) of membrane, installed in prepared Type 2A or Type 2B crack repair areas, measured in place, completed and accepted by the Engineer.

BASIS OF PAYMENT

461-5.1 CRACK REPAIR – TYPE 1. Payment for “Crack Repair, Type 1” will be made at the contract unit price per linear foot (meter). This price will be full compensation for cleaning, and filling the prepared crack with hot pumped applied asphalt with polyester fibers; rolling the overband, and for furnishing all materials, labor, equipment, tools, supplies and incidentals necessary to complete the work.

461-5.2 CRACK REPAIR – TYPE 2A. Payment for “Crack Repair, Type 2A” will be made at the contract unit price per linear foot (meter). This price will be full compensation for pavement milling, preparation and filling of crack, installing, tack coat, and HMA pavement patch as specified herein for pavements to be overlaid; and for furnishing all materials, labor, equipment, tools, supplies and incidentals necessary to complete the work.

461-5.3 CRACK REPAIR - TYPE 2B. Payment for “Crack Repair, Type 2B” will be made at the contract unit price per linear foot (meter). This price will be full compensation for pavement milling or saw cutting, compaction of base course, tack coat, and HMA pavement patch as specified herein for pavements to be overlaid; and for furnishing all materials, labor, equipment, tools, supplies and incidentals necessary to complete the work.

461-5.4 STRESS ABSORBING MEMBRANE, INSTALLED. Payment for “Stress Absorbing Membrane, Installed” will be made at the contract unit price per linear foot (meter). This price will be full compensation for the stress absorbing membrane, installed in prepared Type 2A or Type 2B crack repair areas, as specified herein; and for furnishing all materials, labor, equipment, tools, supplies and incidentals necessary to complete the work.

*************************************************************************************

If the engineer elects not to include a stress absorbing membrane, delete paragraph 461-5.4.

*************************************************************************************


Item M-461-5.1 Crack Repair, Type 1 – per linear foot (meter)

Item M-461-5.2 Crack Repair, Type 2A – per linear foot (meter)

Item M-461-5.3 Crack Repair, Type 2B – per linear foot (meter)

Item M-461-5.4 Stress Absorbing Membrane, Installed – per linear foot (meter)

67


*************************************************************************************

If the engineer decides not to include a stress absorbing membrane, delete pay item M-4615.4.

*************************************************************************************


ASTM D 146 Standard Test Methods for Sampling and Testing Bitumen-Saturated Felts and Woven Fabrics for Roofing and Waterproofing

ASTM D 792 Standard Test Methods for Density and Specific Gravity (Relative Density) of Plastics by Displacement

ASTM D 882 Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Thin Plastic Sheeting

ASTM D 1777 Standard Test Method for Thickness of Textile Materials

ASTM D 2256 Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Yarns by the Single-Strand Method

ASTM D 3418 Standard Test Method for Transition Temperatures and Enthalpies of Fusion and Crystallization of Polymers by Differential Scanning Calorimetry

ASTM E 96, Standard Test Methods for Water Vapor Transmission of Materials Method B

ASTM E 154 Standard Test Methods for Water Vapor Retarders Used in Contact with Earth Under Concrete Slabs, on Walls, or as Ground Cover


ASTM D 2397 Standard Specification for Cationic Emulsified Asphalt

END OF ITEM M-461

68



ITEM M-462 COLD-APPLIED JOINT AND CRACK SEALANTS FOR FLEXIBLE (BITUMINOUS) PAVEMENTS

DESCRIPTION

462-1.1 This item consists of providing and installing a resilient and adhesive [joint][crack] sealant, cold-applied, capable of effectively sealing [joints][cracks] in flexible (hot-mix asphalt) pavements up to 1 inch in width. This item includes the removal of existing, loose, or damaged sealant material where applicable, preparation of the [joints][cracks], and the complete installation of the sealant material.

MATERIALS

462-2.1 The sealant selection will be made based on local climate conditions. The sealant material will be a cold-applied sealant conforming to the requirements of ASTM D 977, ASTM D 7226, ASTM D 2939, and ASTM D 244. The sealant material will also meet the performance characteristics of ASTM D 6690 (or AASHTO M 324), as listed in Table 1 for the classification type specified below:

a. Type I – A joint and crack sealant capable of maintaining an effective seal in moderate climates. The material is tested for low temperature performance at -18°C (-64.4°F) using 50% extension.

b. Type II – A joint and crack sealant capable of maintaining an effective seal in most climates. The material is tested for low temperature performance at -29°C (-84.2°F) using 50% extension.

c. Type III – A joint and crack sealant capable of maintaining an effective seal in most climates. The material is tested for low temperature performance at -29°C (-84.2°F) using 50% extension. Special tests are included.

*************************************************************************************

The Engineer will select the materials to be used for the sealant and delete the paragraphs from 462-2.1a to 462-2.1.c that do not apply.

*************************************************************************************


*

Cone Penetration at 25°C (77°F), per ASTM D 90 max

Bond, non-immersed, per ASTM D 5329 *

Bond, water immersed, per ASTM D 5329 *

Resilience, %, per ASTM D 5329 *

Oven Aged Resilience, %, per ASTM D 5329 *

Asphalt Compatibility, per ASTM D 5329 PassB

69

5329




*************************************************************************************

The Engineer will specify the applicable sealant requirements. Asterisks denote insertion points.


Cone Penetration at 25°C (77°F) per ASTM D 5329

Bond, non-immersed per ASTM D 5329

Bond, water immersed per ASTM D 5329

Resilience, % per ASTM D 5329

Oven Aged Resilience, % per ASTM D 5329

Asphalt Compatibility per ASTM D 5329

Type I Type II Type III

90 max 90 max 90 max

Two out of three 25.4mm specimens pass A 5 cycles at 50% ext at -18°C (-64.4°F)

--

--

Three 12.7mm specimens pass A 3 cycles at 50% ext at 29°C (-84.2°F)

60 min

--



60 min

-- -- 60 min

Pass B Pass B Pass B



70


*************************************************************************************

462-2.2 Backer Rod. The backer rod will be compatible with the sealant. The backer rod will be nonreactive and non-adhesive with the pavement or the sealant. The backer rod will conform to the requirements of ASTM D 5249. The backer rod diameter will be 25 percent larger than the nominal width of the [joint][crack].


462-3.1 Time of Application. [Joints][Cracks] will be sealed as soon after completion of the pavement preparation as feasible and before the pavement is opened to traffic, including construction equipment. The pavement temperature must be above 40°F (4°C) at the time of installation of the cold-applied [joint][crack] sealing material.


a. Removal of Existing Joint Sealant. All existing joint sealants will be removed by routing. Routed joints should be 3/4-inch wide by 3/4-inch in depth. Any remaining sealant / debris will be removed by use of a hot lance and compressed air free of oil and water. In some instances, re-sawing the joints may be required. This is only recommended in areas where the existing joint faces cannot be thoroughly cleaned to satisfactorily promote the effectiveness and adherence of the new sealant. If re-sawing the existing joints is required, immediately after sawing, the joint faces will be cleaned by use of a hot lance and compressed air free of oil and water. Should wet cut sawing equipment be used, the joint will be allowed sufficient time to dry prior to sealing.

b. Sealing. Immediately before sealing, the joints will be thoroughly cleaned of all remaining laitance and other foreign material. Cleaning will be accomplished by use of a hot lance. Upon completion of cleaning, the joints will be blown out with compressed air free of oil and water. Only air compressors with operable oil and water traps will be used to prepare the joints for sealing. The joint faces will be allowed to cool to the ambient temperature and will be surface dry when the seal is applied. Backer rod material may be installed in the joint opening prior to sealing to control depth and sealant usage.


a. Routing. All cracks will be cleaned of any debris or laitance by use of a hot lance and compressed air free of oil and water. In some instances, routing the cracks may be required. If routing of the cracks is required, a 3/4-inch wide by 3/4-inch in depth bit will be used to create the sealant reservoir. Immediately after routing, the resulting debris will be completely removed from the crack and adjacent area by use of a hot lance and compressed air free of oil and water, and by use of other tools as necessary. Should wet cut sawing equipment be used, the crack will be allowed sufficient time to dry prior to sealing.

b. Sealing. Immediately before sealing, the cracks will be thoroughly cleaned of all remaining dust and debris. Cleaning will be accomplished by use of a hot lance. Upon completion of cleaning, the cracks will be blown out with compressed air free of oil and water. Only air compressors with operable oil and water traps will be used to prepare the cracks for sealing. The joint faces will be allowed to cool to the ambient temperature and will be surface dry when the seal is applied. Backer rod material may be installed in the crack opening prior to sealing to control depth and sealant usage.

71


462-3.4 INSTALLATION OF SEALANTS. [Joints][Cracks] will be inspected for preparation and will be approved by the Engineer before sealing is allowed. Sealants will be installed in accordance with the manufacturer’s requirements. The installation of sealants in prepared [joints][cracks] will be flush with the existing pavement surface. Excess material will be removed by squeegee or other approved methods.


462-4.1 The sealant material will be measured by the [gallon (liter)][pound (kg)][linear foot (meter)][lump sum] of sealant in place, completed, and accepted.

BASIS OF PAYMENT

462-5.1 Payment for sealing material will be made at the contract unit price bid per [gallon (liter)][pound (kg)][linear foot (meter)][lump sum]. This price will be full compensation for furnishing all materials, for all preparation, delivering, and placing of these materials, and for all labor, equipment, tools, and incidentals necessary to complete the item.


Item M-462-5.1 [Joint][Crack] Sealant – per [gallon (liter)][pound (kg)][linear foot (meter)][lump sum]


ASTM D 244 Standard Test Methods and Practices for Emulsified Asphalts

ASTM D 2939 Standard Test Methods for Emulsified Bitumens Used as Protective Coatings

ASTM D 7226 Standard Test Method for Determining the Viscosity of Emulsified Asphalts Using a Rotational Paddle Viscometer


ASTM D 977 Standard Specification for Emulsified Asphalt

ASTM D 5249 Standard Specification for Backer Material for Use with Cold- and Hot-Applied Joint Sealants in Portland Cement Concrete and Asphalt Joints

ASTM D 6690 Standard Specification for Joint and Crack Sealants, Hot Applied, for Concrete and Asphalt Pavements

END ITEM M-462

72



ITEM M-564 REPAIR OF PAVEMENT DISTRESSES IN RIGID (PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE) PAVEMENTS

DESCRIPTION

564-1.1 This item consists of repairing pavement distresses (e.g., cracks, spalls, corner breaks, etc.) in rigid (Portland Cement Concrete) pavements, as well as patching of small areas (less than 5 square feet) of PCC pavements. This work consists of: saw cutting, chipping, and removing the existing unsound PCC pavement; cleaning and preparing the area for the repair materials. This work also includes placing, vibrating, and finishing the repair material to reconstruct the PCC pavements, in accordance with this specification.

MATERIALS

564-2.1 The repair method and material will be of the type specified below for the appropriate application, as outlined in Table 1 – Repair Material Usage Matrix.

Table 1. Repair Material Usage Matrix

PAVEMENT DISTRESS

TYPE 1 (Conventional)

TYPE 2A (Pre-packaged w/ Aggregate)

TYPE 2B (Pre-packaged w/o Aggregate)

TYPE 3 (Rapid Setting, Early Strength)

CORNER BREAKS Permanent Permanent n/a Permanent

DURABILITY “D” CRACKING

Permanent Temporary/ Emergency

Temporary/ Emergency

Temporary/ Emergency

SCALING, MAP CRACKING AND CRAZING

Permanent n/a n/a n/a

JOINT SPALLING n/a Permanent Permanent Permanent

CORNER SPALLING n/a Permanent Permanent Permanent

PATCHING, SMALL (less than 5 square feet)

n/a Permanent Permanent Permanent

PATCHING, LARGE AND UTILITY CUTS

Permanent n/a n/a Temporary/ Emergency

SHATTERED SLAB / INTERSECTING CRACKS

Permanent n/a n/a n/a

BLOWUPS Permanent n/a n/a n/a

a. Type 1 – Conventional Concrete Mixture. The conventional concrete mixture will conform to FAA specification P-501 for materials. This repair method is considered a permanent, long term repair as it is typically used for large repair areas requiring 3 cubic yards or more of mix supplied by a local concrete mixing plant.

73


b. Type 2A – Pre-packaged Cementitious Mixture with Aggregate. The pre-packaged, one-component, cementitious mixture will have a minimum compressive strength of 5,000 psi in 7 days when tested in accordance with ASTM C 39. Bond strength will be 2,000 psi in 7 days when tested in accordance with ASTM C 882. The aggregate will conform to the requirements of ASTM C 33. This repair method may be used for either permanent or temporary/emergency repairs dependent on the distress type, as noted in Table 1. Preparation of materials (mixing with potable water, blending, etc) will be per manufacturer’s requirements for the product.

c. Type 2B – Pre-packaged Cementitious Mixture without Aggregate. The pre-packaged, one-component, cementitious mixture will have a minimum compressive strength of 5,000 psi in 7 days when tested in accordance with ASTM C 39. Bond strength will be 2,000 psi in 7 days when tested in accordance with ASTM C 882. If the repair size requires the addition of coarse aggregate, the aggregate to be added maximum size will be 3/8-inch and will conform to the requirements of ASTM C 33. The aggregate will be blended into the pre-packaged mixture per the manufacturer’s requirements. This repair method may be used for either permanent or temporary/emergency repairs dependent on the distress type, as noted in Table 1. Preparation of materials (mixing with potable water, blending, etc) will be per manufacturer’s requirements for the product.

d. Type 3 – Rapid Setting and Early Strength Gaining Cementitious Mixture. The rapid setting and early strength gaining cementitious mixture will have a minimum compressive strength of 2,000 psi in 2 hours and 5,000 psi in 1 day when tested in accordance with ASTM C 109. Bond strength will be 2,000 psi in 7 days when tested in accordance with ASTM C 882. This repair method may be used for either permanent or temporary/emergency repairs dependent on the distress type, as noted in Table 1. Preparation of materials (mixing with potable water, blending, etc) will be per manufacturer’s requirements for the product.

564-2.2 Nonabsorbent Board. The nonabsorbent board will be used as a joint form for the joint reservoir to be protected. The nonabsorbent board will be a standard 1/2-inch asphalt impregnated fiberboard. For joint widths greater than 1/2-inch, the width of the nonabsorbent board will be adjusted to fit the larger joint width.

564-2.3 Curing Compound. The curing compound will be a white pigmented impervious membrane conforming to the requirements of ASTM C 309. The curing compound will be of such character that the film will harden within 30 minutes after application.


564-3.1 Time of Application. The ambient temperature and concrete surface temperature will be within the range specified by the manufacturer’s requirements for that product at the time of application.

564-3.2 Repair of Distresses in PCC Pavements.

a. Corner Breaks / Shattered Slabs / Blowups. These are considered structural failures and require full-depth repairs. The procedures for repairing these types of distresses are as follows:

(1) Make full-depth saw cuts at constructed joints. The FAA recommends that full-depth cuts be made at a distance of at least 2 feet beyond the limits of the break. Make the saw cuts so the repair area is rectangular. For corner cracks, cut the repair area square.

(2) Use appropriate-sized impact equipment (e.g., jackhammer) to remove material within the limits of the saw cuts. When using a hoe-ram or removing the concrete by lifting, make a second saw

74


cut inside the perimeter cuts to provide expansion. Remove by hand any loose materials that remain. During the repair, try to minimize any disturbance to the subgrade soils or base materials.

(3) Restore subgrade or subbase materials to the base elevation of the panel being repaired.

(4) Use tie-bars consisting of #4 deformed bars (#5 bars for pavements more than 12 inches thick) in the faces of the parent panel. Install by drilling into the face and using an epoxy bonding agent. Use equidistant spacing of the bars, but do not install them more than 24 inches apart. When spacing bars, do not allow their ends to overlap with those of other tie-bars or dowels.

(5) Use dowel bars, of the type and size of the existing dowel bars, in the joint that parallels the direction of traffic. On aprons and areas where traffic may be oblique to joints, install dowels in both joint faces. Dowels are installed by drilling and epoxying. Dowel bars will spaced at least one bar spacing away from faces parallel to the dowel bar. Space dowel bar ends at least one bar spacing apart at corners of intersecting joints. Oil exposed dowel bar ends prior to backfilling with concrete.

(6) Install nonabsorbent board within the limits of the joint seal reservoirs along the adjacent concrete panels. When repairing multiple panels, restore the joint seal reservoirs with the nonabsorbent filler board.

(7) Fill the repair area with concrete, being sure to consolidate the concrete along the limits of repair. Exercise caution when working adjacent to existing concrete faces, particularly during consolidation, and watch for segregation of the concrete. Finish the surface to match existing surface when practical.

(8) After the concrete cures, remove the nonabsorbent board by sawing. Reinstall joint seal material per specification M-361 or M-362.

b. Durability “D” Cracking. This type of distress usually requires repairing the complete slab since “D” cracking will normally reappear adjacent to the repaired areas. Temporary/emergency repairs can be made using the technique noted in paragraph 564-3.2.a (Corner Breaks/Shattered Slabs/Blowups). Another temporary/emergency repair, which is not a preferred method but is a rapid repair, is the partial depth repair by milling 2-3 inches in depth by 3-4 feet in length and width and filling the patch area with a high quality HMA.

c. Scaling, Map Cracking, and Crazing. If the distress is severe and produces FOD, the repair method is to remove and replace the area. Permanent repairs can be made using the technique noted in paragraph 564-3.2.a (Corner Breaks/Shattered Slabs/Blowups).

d. Joint Spalling and Corner Spalling. The procedure for the repair of spalls is as follows:

(1) Make a vertical cut with a concrete saw 2 inches in depth and approximately 2 inches outside of the spalled area. Saw cuts will be straight lines forming rectangular areas.

(2) Remove all unsound concrete until sound, intact material has been reached (into at least 1/2-inch of visually sound concrete). Break out the unsound concrete with air hammers or pneumatic drills and blow out the area with oil-free compressed air.

(3) Clean the area to be repaired with high-pressure water. Allow patch area to dry completely if required by the patch material specification.

75


(4) Treat the surface (all sides and bottom, except any joint face) with a neat cement grout mixture to ensure a good bond between the existing and new concrete. It is important to maintain the joint through the full depth of the spall repair and prevent a bond between the patch and the adjacent slab, thereby eliminating point-to-point loading. Apply the grout immediately before placing the patch mixture and spread with a stiff-bristle broom or brush to a depth of 1/16 inches. The use of liquid bonding agents will be acceptable if recommended by the manufacturer’s requirements.

(5) Place the nonabsorbent board in the joint groove and vibrate or tamp the new mixture into the old surface.

(6) After edging the patch, finish it to a texture matching the adjacent area. After a proper cure period, remove the nonabsorbent board by sawing. Reinstall joint seal material per specification M361 or M-362.

(7) When there are adjacent spall repair areas within a slab, the minimum distance between repair areas is 1-1/2 feet. Therefore, when repairs areas are less than 1-1/2 feet apart, combine the repair areas into one repair. Similarly, when the repair areas are greater than 1-1/2 feet apart, maintain separate repair areas.

e. Patching, Small (less than 5 square feet). Patching repairs can be made using the technique noted in paragraph 564-3.2.d (Joint Spalling and Corner Spalling). For full-depth repairs, follow technique noted in paragraph 564-3.2.f (Patching, Large or Utility Cut).

f. Patching, Large or Utility Cut. The procedure for patching a large or utility cut areas of PCC pavement is as follows:

(1) Make a full-depth vertical cut with a concrete saw at the limits of the area to be patched (approximately 6 inches outside of each end of the broken area).

(2) Break out the concrete with pneumatic tools, and remove concrete down to the subbase/subgrade material.

(3) Add subbase material, if necessary, and compact.

(4) In reinforced pavement construction, use joint techniques to tie the new concrete to the old reinforced material. Dowel any replacement joints, and build them to joint specifications. Follow procedures in paragraph 564-3.2.a(4) or 564-3.2a.(5) as appropriate.

(5) Dampen the subgrade and the edges of existing PCC pavement. Place conventional concrete on the area to be patched. Finish the concrete so the surface texture approximates that of the existing pavement.

(6) Immediately after completing finishing operations, properly cure the surface with curing compound.

(7) After a proper cure period, fill the open joints with joint sealant per specification M-361 or M-362.

*************************************************************************************

Delete the paragraphs from 564-3.2a to 564-3.2f that do not apply.

76


*************************************************************************************


564-4.1 The repair will be measured by the [cubic yard (cubic meter)] for large areas and by the [square foot (square meter)] for small areas for the material in place, completed, and accepted.

BASIS OF PAYMENT

564-5.1 Payment for repairs will be made at the contract unit price bid per [cubic yard (cubic meter)][square foot (square meter)]. This price will be full compensation for furnishing all materials, for all preparation, delivering, and placing of these materials, and for all labor, equipment, tools, and incidentals necessary to complete the item.


Item M-564-5.1 Type 1 – per [cubic yard (cubic meter)][square foot (square meter)]

Item M-564-5.2 Type 2A – per [square foot (square meter)]

Item M-564-5.3 Type 2B – per [square foot (square meter)]

Item M-564-5.4 Type 3 – per [cubic yard (cubic meter)][square foot (square meter)]


ASTM C 39 Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens

ASTM C 109 Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars(Using 2-in. or [50-mm] Cube Specimens)

ASTM C 882 Standard Test Method for Bond Strength of Epoxy-Resin Systems Used With Concrete By Slant Shear


ASTM C 33 Standard Specification for Concrete Aggregates

ASTM C 309 Standard Specification for Liquid Membrane-Forming Compounds for Curing Concrete

END ITEM M-564

77



78

September 28, 2007 AC 150/5380-6B Appendix C

APPENDIX C. GENERIC TYPICAL DETAILS

This appendix provides guidance in the installation of materials and repair procedures through generic typical details. The generic typical details include such items as: repair of cracks, corner breaks, joint spalls, corner spalls, and blowups in rigid pavement; patching in rigid pavement; temporary patching of rigid pavement with flexible pavement; and repair of cracks in flexible pavement.

79

AC 150/5380-6B September 28, 2007 Appendix C

Figure C - 1.A. Existing Condition Random Crack in Rigid Pavement Detail Figure C - 1.B. Proposed Saw Cut and Seal Detail

80


Figure C - 2. Corner Break Repair Detail - Section

81


Figure C - 3. Corner Break Repair Saw Cut Detail - Plan

82


Figure C - 4. Existing Condition Reseal/ Repair of Saw Cut Joint Detail

83


Figure C - 5. Joint Spall Repair at Existing Rigid Pavement Joint Detail

84


Figure C - 6. Spall Repair at Existing Rigid Pavement Isolation Joint Detail

85


Figure C - 7. Typical Popout Spall Repair Detail

86


Figure C - 8. Full Depth Rigid Pavement Slab Repair Detail - Plan

87


Figure C - 9. Full Depth Rigid Pavement Slab Repair Detail - Section

88


Figure C - 10. Saw Cut Contraction Joint Detail

89


Figure C - 11. Saw Cut Detail Rigid Pavement/Rigid Pavement Interface Large Slab(s) Repairs

90


Figure C - 12. Temporary Repairs of Rigid Pavements Using Flexible Pavement Detail

91


Figure C - 13. Saw and Seal Joint Detail Rigid/Flexible Pavement Interface

92


Figure C - 14. Crack Repair Detail – Cracks Less Than 1” Wide and Greater Than 1/8” Wide Using Router

93


Figure C - 15. Crack Repair With HMA Pavement Overlay 2” or Greater Detail

94


Figure C - 16. Type 1 Crack Repair Detail – Hot Applied Sealant With Fibers

95


Figure C - 17. Type 2A Crack Repair Detail – Cracks Greater Than 1” Wide in Pavements 5” or Greater in Thickness

96


Figure C - 18. Type 2B Crack Repair Detail – Cracks Greater Than 1” Wide in Pavements Less Than 5” in Thickness

97


Figure C - 19. Saw and Seal HMA Pavements Detail ‘A’

98

September 28, 2007 AC 150/5380-6B Appendix D

APPENDIX D. BIBLIOGRAPHY

1. Joint and Crack Sealing and Repair for Concrete Pavements, TB012P, American Concrete Pavement Association, Skokie, IL, 1993.

2. Diamond Grinding and Concrete Pavement Restoration, TB008P, American Concrete Pavement Association, Skokie, IL, 2000.

3. Slab Stabilization Guidelines for Concrete Pavements, TB018P, American Concrete Pavement Association, Skokie, IL, 1994.

4. Stitching Concrete Pavement Cracks and Joints, SR903P, American Concrete Pavement Association, Skokie, IL, 2001.

5. Concrete Pavement Rehabilitation, Guide for Load Transfer Restoration, JP001P, American Concrete Pavement Association, Skokie, IL, 1998.

6. The Concrete Pavement Restoration Guide, TB020P, American Concrete Pavement Association, Skokie, IL, 1998.

7. Concrete Pavement Repair Manual, JP002P, American Concrete Pavement Association, Skokie, IL, June, 2003.

8. Concrete Crack and Partial-Depth Spall Repair Manual, JP003P, American Concrete Pavement Association, Skokie, IL, 2003.

9. SHRP H 349 Concrete Pavement Repair Manuals of Practice, Materials and Procedures for the Repair of Joint Seals in Concrete Pavements, Materials and Procedures for Rapid Repair of Partial-Depth Spalls in Concrete Pavements, Strategic Highway Research Program–National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1993.

10. SHRP H 348 Asphalt Pavement Repair Manuals of Practice, Materials and Procedures for Sealing and Filling Cracks in Asphalt-Surfaced Pavements, Materials and Procedures for the Repair of Potholes in Asphalt-Surfaced Pavements, Strategic Highway Research Program–National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1993.

11. Maintenance of Joints and Cracks in Concrete Pavement, IS188.01P, Portland Cement Association, Skokie, Illinois 60077, 1976.

12. Asphalt in Pavement Maintenance, MS-16, Third Edition, The Asphalt Institute, Lexington, KY 40512, 1997.

13. The Basic Asphalt Emulsion Manual, MS-19 Third Edition, The Asphalt Institute, Lexington, KY 40512, 1998.

14. Asphalt Overlays for Highway and Street Rehabilitation, MS-17, Third Edition, The Asphalt Institute, Lexington, KY 40512, 2000.

15. Maintenance and Repair of Surface Areas, TM 5-624, MO-1 02, AFR 85-8, Departments of the Army, Navy, and Air Force, Washington, DC, 1977.

99

AC 150/5380-6B September 28, 2007 Appendix D

16. Pavement Rehabilitation Materials and Techniques, Synthesis of Highway Practice 9, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, DC, 1972.

17. Sealing Joints and Cracks, Thin Resurfacing, and Locating Voids Under Concrete Slabs, Transportation Research Record 752, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1980.

18. Report No. DOT/FAA/PM-87/8, Micro-PAVER, Concept and Development, Airport Pavement Management System. 1988

19. Report No. CEEDO-TR-77-44-VOL-1, Development of a Pavement Maintenance Management System, Volume I: Maintenance and Repair Guidelines for Airfield Pavements, Construction Engineering Research Laboratory, Champaign, IL, December 1977.

20. Report No. CEEDO-TR-77-44-VOL-2, Development of a Pavement Maintenance Management System, Volume II: Airfield Pavement Distress Identification Manual, Construction Engineering Research Laboratory, Champaign, IL, December 1977.

21. Report No. CEEDO-TR-77-44-VOL-3, Development of a Pavement Maintenance Management System, Volume III: Maintenance and Repair Guidelines for Airfield Pavements, Construction Engineering Research Laboratory, Champaign, IL, September 1977.

22. Report No. CEEDO-TR-77-44-VOL-4, Development of a Pavement Maintenance Management System, Volume IV: Appendices A through I, Maintenance and Repair Guidelines for Airfield Pavements, Construction Engineering Research Laboratory, Champaign, IL, September 1977.

23. Report No. FAA-RD-75-110-II, Methodology for Determining, Isolating, and Correcting Runway Roughness, Civil Engineering Research Facility, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, June 1977

24. Document No. D6-81746, Runway Roughness Measurement, Quantification, and Application–The Boeing Method, Boeing Commercial Airplane Group–Airport Technology Organization, Seattle, Washington, 2002.

25. Report No. FAA-RD-80-55, Procedures for Condition Survey of Civil Airports, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experimental Station, Vicksburg, MS, May 1980.

26. AC 150/5320-5, Airport Drainage.

27. AC 150/5320-6, Airport Pavement Design and Evaluation.

28. AC 150/5320-12, Measurement, Construction, and Maintenance of Skid Resistant Airport Pavement Surfaces.

29. AC 150/5370-11, Use of Nondestructive Testing Devices in the Evaluation of Airport Pavements.

30. AC 150/5380-7, Airport Pavement Management System.

100

APPENDIX C

CAUSE OF DISTRESS


Applied Pavement Technology, Inc. C-1

Table C-1. Cause of pavement distress, asphalt-surfaced pavements.

Distress Type Probable Cause of Distress

Alligator Cracking

Fatigue failure of the asphalt concrete surface under repeated traffic loading.

Bleeding Excessive amounts of asphalt cement or tars in the mix and/or low air void content.

Block Cracking Shrinkage of the asphalt concrete and daily temperature cycling; it is not load associated.

Corrugation Traffic action combined with an unstable pavement layer.

Depression Settlement of the foundation soil or can be “built up” during construction.

Jet Blast Bituminous binder has been burned or carbonized. Joint Reflection

Cracking Movement of the concrete slab beneath the asphalt concrete surface because of thermal and moisture changes.

Longitudinal and Transverse Cracking

Cracks may be caused by 1) a poorly constructed paving lane joint, 2) shrinkage of the AC surface due to low temperatures or hardening of the asphalt, or 3) reflective cracking caused by cracks in an underlying portland cement concrete (PCC) slab.

Oil Spillage Deterioration or softening of the pavement surface caused by the spilling of oil, fuel, or other solvents.

Patching N/A Polished

Aggregate Repeated traffic applications.

Raveling Asphalt binder may have hardened significantly, causing coarse aggregate pieces to dislodge.

Rutting Usually caused by consolidation or lateral movement of the materials due to traffic loads.

Shoving Where PCC pavements adjoin flexible pavements, PCC “growth” may shove the asphalt pavement.

Slippage Cracking

Low strength surface mix or poor bond between the surface and the next layer of the pavement structure.

Swelling Usually caused by frost action or by swelling soil.

Weathering Asphalt binder and/or fine aggregate may wear away as the pavement ages and hardens.


Applied Pavement Technology, Inc. C-2

Table C-2. Cause of pavement distress, PCC pavements.

Distress Type Probable Cause of Distress

Alkali-Silica Reaction (ASR)

Chemical reaction of alkalis in the portland cement with certain reactive silica minerals. ASR may be accelerated by the use of chemical pavement deicers.

Blow-Up Incompressibles in the joints. Corner Break Load repetition combined with loss of support and curling stresses.

Linear Cracking Combination of load repetition, curling stresses, and shrinkage stresses.

Durability Cracking

Concrete’s inability to withstand environmental factors such as freeze-thaw cycles.

Joint Seal Damage

Stripping of joint sealant, extrusion of joint sealant, weed growth, hardening of the filler (oxidation), loss of bond to the slab edges, or absence of sealant in the joint.

Patching (Small and Large) N/A

Popouts Freeze-thaw action in combination with expansive aggregates. Pumping Poor drainage, poor joint sealant.

Scaling Over finishing of concrete, deicing salts, improper construction, freeze-thaw cycles, and poor aggregate.

Settlement Upheaval or consolidation. Shattered Slab Load repetition.

Shrinkage Cracking Setting and curing of the concrete.

Spalling (Joint and Corner)

Excessive stresses at the joint caused by infiltration of incompressible materials or traffic loads; weak concrete at the joint combined with traffic loads.

APPENDIX D

PAVEMENT INSPECTION SUMMARY

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-1

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Table D-1. Pavement inspection summary.

Airport Name Branch Section Surface

Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI

% Distress due to: Distress Types

Load Climate or Durability

A.J. Eisenberg Airport

A01OH 01 AC 20,659 WEST 9/1/1958 27 37 57 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Oil Spillage, Patching, Raveling

A02OH 01 AC 16,766 WEST 9/1/1958 31 51 36 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling, Rutting

AHLD07OH 01 AC 6,055 WEST 9/1/1958 41 24 72 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

AHLD25OH 01 AC 5,795 WEST 9/1/1958 15 26 41 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Oil Spillage, Raveling

RW0725OH 01 AC 85,076 WEST 9/1/1958 13 61 39 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling, Rutting

TAOH 01 AC 7,925 WEST 9/1/1990 79 28 66 Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Rutting, Weathering

Anacortes Airport

A01AN

01 AAC 111,593 WEST 9/1/1996 78 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching

02 AAC 57,647 WEST 9/1/2001 77 0 100 L&T Cracking

03 AC 16,009 WEST 6/3/2008 100 0 0 No distress

04 PCC 2,000 WEST 6/2/2008 89 37 63 Corner Break, Joint Seal Damage


AHLD18AN 01 AAC 6,914 WEST 9/1/1996 92 0 100 L&T Cracking

AHLD36AN 01 AAC 5,800 WEST 9/1/1996 95 0 100 L&T Cracking

R18AN 01 AAC 180,671 WEST 9/1/2003 93 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching

TAAN 01 AAC 124,504 WEST 9/1/1996 84 42 58 L&T Cracking, Patching, Rutting

Table D-1. Pavement inspection summary (continued).

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-2

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI



Anacortes Airport TH01AN

01 AAC 37,999 WEST 9/1/1996 72 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering

02 AC 100,789 WEST 6/1/2008 98 0 100 L&T Cracking



Anderson Field Airport

A01BW 01 AC 92,379 NCNT 8/3/2005 90 0 100 L&T Cracking

A02BW 01 PCC 3,114 NCNT 9/1/1934 43 100 0 Shattered Slab

R07BW 01 AC 239,993 NCNT 8/4/2005 95 0 100 L&T Cracking

T01BW 01 AC 14,647 NCNT 8/3/2005 94 0 100 L&T Cracking

T03BW 01 AC 5,144 NCNT 9/2/1987 39 53 44 Alligator Cracking, Bleeding, L&T Cracking, Weathering

T04BW 01 AC 14,649 NCNT 8/3/2005 95 0 100 L&T Cracking

Apex Airport R17SD 01 AC 72,022 WEST 6/1/1982 87 0 98 Depression, L&T Cracking

TASD 01 AC 50,321 WEST 6/1/1985 74 60 40 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking

Arlington Municipal Airport

A01AR 01 AC 25,283 WEST 9/2/1997 88 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering


A03AR 01 AC 19,142 WEST 9/2/1997 86 0 100 Patching


A05AR 01 AC 21,250 WEST 9/1/1999 96 0 100 L&T Cracking

AAIRAR 01 AC 33,854 WEST 9/2/1989 84 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching

ABAYAR





Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-3

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




AHP1AR 01 AC 23,918 WEST 6/3/2009 90 0 100 Patching

AMNDAR 01 AC 146,311 WEST 9/2/1943 49 35 59 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering

APMMAR 01 AC 17,212 WEST 9/2/1991 94 0 96 Bleeding, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching

AR1AR

01 APC 24,716 WEST 9/1/1993 71 0 100 Joint Reflection Cracking, L&T Cracking

02 PCC 524,898 WEST 9/2/1943 91 67 0

Corner Spalling, Faulting, Joint Spalling, LTD Cracking, Shrinkage Cracking, Small Patch

AR2AR 01 AC 96,577 WEST 9/3/1990 86 0 100 L&T Cracking

AR3AR 01 AC 36,074 WEST 6/3/2009 100 0 0 No distress

R11AR 01 AAC 291,122 WEST 9/1/1991 69 0 100 Block Cracking, L&T Cracking

R16AR 01 AAC 533,300 WEST 9/1/1994 87 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching

T02AR 01 AC 199,205 WEST 9/2/1943 28 36 63 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling

T03AR 01 AC 21,899 WEST 9/1/1999 90 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

TA4AR 01 AAC 83,410 WEST 9/1/1994 91 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching

TAAR 01 AAC 353,038 WEST 9/1/1993 92 0 100 L&T Cracking

02 AAC 68,139 WEST 9/1/1994 76 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

TB2AR 01 AC 21,558 WEST 9/1/2003 92 0 100 L&T Cracking

TBAR





Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-4

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




TBAYAR 01 AC 21,263 WEST 9/1/2001 98 0 100 L&T Cracking

TC1AR 01 AAC 4,187 WEST 6/1/2009 100 0 0 No distress


TC2AR 02 AAC 4,223 WEST 9/1/1991 86 0 100 L&T Cracking



TCAR 01 AAC 155,474 WEST 6/1/2009 100 0 0 No distress

TD2AR 01 AC 22,517 WEST 6/3/2009 100 0 0 No distress

TDAR 01 AAC 142,819 WEST 6/1/2009 100 0 0 No distress

TFAR 01 AC 239,020 WEST 6/3/2005 97 0 100 Bleeding, L&T Cracking

THGRAR


02 AC 14,923 WEST 9/2/1988 66 45 54 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering

03 AC 30,784 WEST 9/2/1996 97 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

05 AC 12,000 WEST 6/1/2011 96 0 35 Depression, L&T Cracking


07 AC 40,081 WEST 9/1/2002 97 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching



10 AC 21,367 WEST 9/2/1990 81 31 68 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching

11 AC 18,044 WEST 9/2/1975 59 41 59 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-5

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




THGRAR

12 AC 13,311 WEST 9/2/1994 57 52 48 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling, Weathering

13 AC 13,484 WEST 9/1/2000 98 0 100 Patching


16 AC 6,500 WEST 9/1/2000 89 0 91 Patching, Swelling

05A AC 18,000 WEST 9/2/1989 53 60 40 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching

TPMMAR


02 AC 7,736 WEST 9/2/1989 64 67 33 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking

04 AC 9,656 WEST 9/2/1989 54 74 26 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching


TR2AR 01 AC 13,005 WEST 9/3/1990 68 38 62

Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering


Auburn Municipal Airport

A01AU 01 AC 164,504 WEST 9/3/1982 71 19 81 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

A02AU 01 AC 370,255 WEST 9/3/1972 45 51 41

Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling, Rutting, Swelling, Weathering

A03AU

02 AC 113,274 WEST 9/2/1989 76 0 99 Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling, Weathering

03 AC 80,500 WEST 9/3/1986 65 11 86 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Oil Spillage, Patching, Raveling, Weathering


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-6

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI



Auburn Municipal Airport

A04AU 01 AC 8,407 WEST 9/3/1986 71 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

A05AU 01 AC 7,821 WEST 9/2/1969 63 23 77 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering

A06AU 01 AC 13,602 WEST 6/3/2009 100 0 0 No distress

A07AU 01 AC 12,957 WEST 6/3/2009 100 0 0 No distress

R16AU 01 AAC 37,500 WEST 9/1/2004 81 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling


T08AU 01 AC 99,080 WEST 9/3/1999 75 14 85 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling, Weathering

TAAU


02 AC 11,743 WEST 9/2/1969 61 13 74 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Swelling, Weathering


TBAU


02 AC 60,855 WEST 9/2/1969 29 48 43 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling, Weathering

TGAU 01 AC 20,039 WEST 9/2/1969 60 25 74 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering

Bellingham International Airport

A01BL 01 AC 119,675 WEST 6/3/2003 90 0 82 L&T Cracking, Oil Spillage


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-7

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




AGABL




04 AAC 204,477 WEST 6/1/1991 71 54 37 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Rutting, Swelling


AHLD16BL 01 AAC 28,991 WEST 6/3/2010 100 0 0 No distress

AHLD34BL 01 AAC 142,531 WEST 12/1/1995 100 0 0 No distress

ATERMBL

01 PCC 72,643 WEST 3/21/2010 100 0 0 No distress


03 PCC 61,539 WEST 12/1/1998 99 0 0 Small Patch


R34BL

01C AAC 87,500 WEST 8/4/2010 100 0 0 No distress

01W AAC 175,000 WEST 8/4/2010 100 0 0 No distress

02C APC 249,968 WEST 8/4/2010 100 0 0 No distress

02W APC 499,935 WEST 6/4/2010 100 0 0 No distress

TABL 01 AC 555,195 WEST 12/1/1998 100 0 0 No distress

TBBL 01 AC 32,981 WEST 6/5/2010 100 0 0 No distress

TCBL 01 AAC 35,063 WEST 6/4/2010 100 0 0 No distress

TDBL 01 APC 36,090 WEST 6/4/2010 100 0 0 No distress


TEBL 01 AAC 45,172 WEST 6/4/2010 100 0 0 No distress


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-8

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




TEBL 02 AC 29,395 WEST 6/4/2008 100 0 0 No distress

TFBL

01 AAC 47,727 WEST 6/4/2010 100 0 0 No distress

02 APC 28,477 WEST 12/1/1992 61 0 100 Block Cracking, L&T Cracking, Weathering

03 AC 17,120 WEST 12/1/1992 58 59 41 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Weathering


05 AAC 15,529 WEST 12/1/1992 71 25 75 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Weathering

TGBL 01 AC 20,460 WEST 6/5/2010 100 0 0 No distress

THANGBL



03 AAC 32,111 WEST 6/1/1991 80 79 17 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Rutting, Swelling

04 AC 20,130 WEST 6/2/1990 71 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering


THBL 01 AAC 58,234 WEST 6/4/2010 100 0 0 No distress

Bowerman Field Airport

A01HO 01 AC 24,529 CSTL 9/3/1990 88 0 100 L&T Cracking

A02HO 01 AC 61,032 CSTL 9/1/1950 23 15 83

Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Swelling

02 AC 6,600 CSTL 9/1/1994 86 0 90 L&T Cracking, Raveling, Swelling

A03HO 01 AAC 82,445 CSTL 9/1/1992 88 0 88 Bleeding, L&T Cracking, Oil Spillage, Raveling


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-9

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




A03HO

02 APC 12,310 CSTL 9/1/1992 83 0 81 Bleeding, Depression, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

03 AC 109,101 CSTL 9/3/1992 90 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

04 AAC 59,177 CSTL 9/1/1992 90 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling

R06HO

01A APC 15,000 CSTL 9/1/1990 79 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling

01B APC 7,500 CSTL 9/1/1990 78 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling

02A AAC 470,058 CSTL 9/1/1990 77 0 96 L&T Cracking, Swelling

02B AAC 235,029 CSTL 9/1/1990 79 0 96 L&T Cracking, Swelling

03A APC 15,000 CSTL 9/1/1990 74 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling

03B APC 7,500 CSTL 9/1/1990 76 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling

T01HO 01 AAC 240,899 CSTL 9/1/1990 80 0 100

L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling, Weathering

02 AC 28,280 CSTL 9/2/1992 92 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

T02HO 01 AC 6,043 CSTL 9/1/1988 55 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling

T03HO 01 AC 6,070 CSTL 9/1/1991 51 38 62 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering

T04HO 01 AC 5,443 CSTL 9/1/1968 35 45 55 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling, Rutting, Weathering

T05HO 01 AC 3,642 CSTL 9/1/1936 25 44 50 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering



Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-10

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




T07HO 01 AC 3,643 CSTL 9/1/1940 21 61 39 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling, Weathering


T09HO 01 AAC 15,896 CSTL 9/1/1990 93 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching

T10HO 01 AAC 15,896 CSTL 9/1/1990 88 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling

Bowers Field Airport

A01EL

01 AC 29,967 SCNT 6/4/2007 92 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling

02 PCC 356,306 SCNT 9/2/1943 65 42 21

Corner Break, Corner Spalling, Joint Seal Damage, Joint Spalling, LTD Cracking, Scaling, Shattered Slab, Shrinkage Cracking

03 AAC 234,879 SCNT 9/1/1995 68 26 74 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

04 AC 19,728 SCNT 6/4/2007 82 35 65 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling

06 PCC 1,250 SCNT 6/2/2007 100 0 0 No distress

R07EL

03 AC 8,047 SCNT 9/2/1942 36 14 85 Alligator Cracking, Block Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Swelling

01A AC 116,600 SCNT 9/3/1943 26 60 36 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Swelling, Weathering

01B AC 58,307 SCNT 9/3/1943 20 59 40 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Rutting


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-11

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




R07EL

02A AC 429,490 SCNT 9/2/1942 48 17 75 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Swelling, Weathering

02B AC 214,743 SCNT 9/2/1942 41 32 60

Alligator Cracking, Block Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling, Swelling

R11EL

02 AC 10,738 SCNT 9/2/1942 27 20 80 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling

01A AC 308,958 SCNT 9/2/1942 33 49 47


01B PCC 322,500 SCNT 6/1/1997 93 57 0

Corner Break, Corner Spalling, Joint Spalling, LTD Cracking, Shrinkage Cracking, Small Patch

T01EL 01 AC 65,476 SCNT 6/4/2007 61 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling

02 AC 18,504 SCNT 9/2/1942 5 53 45 Alligator Cracking, Block Cracking, Depression, Raveling

T02EL 01 PCC 7,500 SCNT 9/1/1942 73 0 34 Corner Spalling, Joint Seal Damage, Joint Spalling, Shrinkage Cracking

T06EL 01 PCC 44,700 SCNT 9/1/1997 93 27 0 Corner Break, Corner Spalling, Joint Spalling, Scaling, Shrinkage Cracking

TAEL

01 AAC 127,073 SCNT 9/1/2002 84 0 100 L&T Cracking

02 AAC 21,972 SCNT 9/1/2002 79 0 99 Depression, L&T Cracking, Weathering


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-12

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




TAEL

03 AAC 60,550 SCNT 9/1/1995 82 0 95 L&T Cracking, Swelling, Weathering

04 AAC 99,141 SCNT 9/1/2002 80 37 63 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Weathering

05 AAC 51,149 SCNT 9/1/2002 88 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling

TCEL 01 AAC 51,349 SCNT 9/1/2002 95 0 100 L&T Cracking

TFEL 01 AAC 106,894 SCNT 9/1/2002 83 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

Bremerton National Airport

A01BR 01 AC 100,417 WEST 9/2/1995 99 0 100 Bleeding, L&T Cracking

A02BR





05 AC 20,120 WEST 9/2/1971 38 56 44 Alligator Cracking, Block Cracking, L&T Cracking

A03BR


02 AC 44,798 WEST 9/2/1978 36 0 97 L&T Cracking, Oil Spillage, Raveling

03 AC 130,599 WEST 9/2/1968 65 0 100 Block Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

04 AC 46,682 WEST 9/2/1976 67 22 78 Alligator Cracking, Block Cracking, L&T Cracking

05 AC 138,150 WEST 9/2/1981 74 26 69 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Oil Spillage


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-13

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




A04BR 01 AC 41,300 WEST 9/2/1943 21 22 65

Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Raveling

02 AAC 2,114 WEST 9/1/1978 56 36 64 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Raveling

A05BR 01 AC 77,323 WEST 9/1/2004 86 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching

AFUELBR 01 AC 15,326 WEST 9/3/1996 67 57 43 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking

AH1BR 01 AC 17,350 WEST 9/2/1994 96 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

AH2BR 01 AC 22,000 WEST 9/2/1994 85 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

AH3BR 01 AC 29,446 WEST 6/4/2006 100 0 0 No distress

R01BR

01A AAC 90,000 WEST 5/1/2010 98 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering

01B AAC 45,000 WEST 5/1/2010 95 0 100 Patching, Weathering

02A AAC 261,500 WEST 5/1/2010 99 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

02B AAC 130,750 WEST 5/1/2010 97 0 100 Patching, Weathering

03A AAC 151,500 WEST 5/1/2010 99 0 100 L&T Cracking

03B AAC 75,750 WEST 5/1/2010 100 0 0 No distress

04A AC 67,700 WEST 6/4/2006 100 0 0 No distress

04B AC 33,850 WEST 6/4/2006 99 0 100 Weathering

05A AAC 31,000 WEST 5/1/2010 99 0 100 Weathering

05B AAC 15,500 WEST 5/1/2010 99 0 100 Weathering

T01BR


02 AAC 34,809 WEST 9/1/1991 86 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

03 AC 30,137 WEST 9/2/1991 56 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-14

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




T01BR 04 AC 9,885 WEST 9/2/1991 81 0 100

L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering


T02BR 01 AAC 28,732 WEST 6/1/2009 100 0 0 No distress

TABR




04 AAC 10,712 WEST 9/1/1978 66 19 81 Alligator Cracking, Block Cracking, L&T Cracking

05 AC 16,000 WEST 9/2/1978 70 15 85 Alligator Cracking, Block Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching


TBBR 01 AC 10,787 WEST 9/2/1994 84 0 100 L&T Cracking


TCBR 01 AC 8,887 WEST 9/2/1978 65 0 100

Block Cracking, L&T Cracking, Weathering


TDBR 01 AC 12,987 WEST 9/2/1978 63 0 100

Block Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering


TEBR 01 AAC 22,548 WEST 9/1/1976 66 17 83

Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Weathering



Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-15

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




TFBR



03 AC 10,760 WEST 9/2/1977 52 37 49 Alligator Cracking, Bleeding, Block Cracking, L&T Cracking, Weathering


TGBR 01 AC 7,043 WEST 9/2/1977 48 38 62

Alligator Cracking, Block Cracking, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering


TJBR 01 AC 18,243 WEST 9/2/1994 94 0 100 L&T Cracking

Camano Island Airport

A01CI 01 AAC 1,112 WEST 6/1/2005 21 62 5

Alligator Cracking, Depression, Weathering

02 PCC 1,560 WEST 6/1/1980 13 89 11 Joint Seal Damage, LTD Cracking, Shattered Slab

R16CI 01 AC 46,178 WEST 1/1/1980 53 27 73 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Rutting, Weathering

T01CI 01 AC 6,000 WEST 1/1/1980 40 24 72 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

Cashmere-Dryden Airport

A01CD 01 AC 5,483 NCNT 6/3/2008 96 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

R07CD 01 AC 90,250 NCNT 9/1/2001 71 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

T01CD 01 AC 57,235 NCNT 6/3/2008 97 0 100 Raveling, Weathering


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-16

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI



Cashmere-Dryden Airport

T02CD 01 AAC 22,227 NCNT 9/1/1988 9 69 19


Chehalis-Centralia Airport

A02CS 01 AC 4,340 WEST 9/1/1960 0 59 41 Alligator Cracking, Patching, Raveling

AACS 01 PCC 4,176 WEST 9/1/1985 39 81 15 Corner Spalling, Joint Seal Damage, LTD Cracking

ABCS 01 PCC 4,400 WEST 9/1/1985 59 57 20

Corner Break, Faulting, Joint Seal Damage, LTD Cracking, Shrinkage Cracking


ACCS 01 PCC 2,312 WEST 9/1/1960 7 77 9 Corner Break, Faulting, Joint Seal Damage, LTD Cracking, Shattered Slab

ADCS

01 PCC 18,377 WEST 9/1/1960 7 93 7

Corner Break, Joint Seal Damage, LTD Cracking, Shattered Slab, Shrinkage Cracking

02 AC 5,223 WEST 9/1/1985 16 33 67 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling, Rutting

AFBOCS 01 AC 47,473 WEST 9/3/1952 43 39 60

Alligator Cracking, Block Cracking, L&T Cracking, Oil Spillage, Patching, Raveling, Weathering

APRNCS 01 AC 11,835 WEST 9/3/1993 81 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-17

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




APRNCS

02 AC 91,548 WEST 9/3/1982 63 16 81 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Oil Spillage, Patching, Raveling, Weathering


04 AC 40,490 WEST 1/1/2007 100 0 0 Swelling

R16CS

01A PCC 450,000 WEST 9/2/1942 84 30 51 Corner Spalling, Faulting, Joint Seal Damage, Joint Spalling, LTD Cracking, Shattered Slab

01B PCC 250,000 WEST 9/2/1942 89 6 69

Corner Break, Corner Spalling, Faulting, Joint Seal Damage, Joint Spalling, Large Patch/Utility, LTD Cracking, Shrinkage Cracking, Small Patch

T01CS 01 AC 15,754 WEST 9/3/1982 34 49 49

Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering


T02CS 01 AC 20,821 WEST 9/3/1982 26 48 52 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling, Rutting, Weathering

T03CS 01 AC 21,483 WEST 9/3/1982 61 46 54 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering

T04CS 01 AC 11,076 WEST 9/3/1981 26 52 48 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

T05CS 01 AC 49,940 WEST 6/1/2005 90 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering

T06CS 01 AC 56,626 WEST 6/2/2006 96 0 100 L&T Cracking


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-18

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




TA2CS 01 AC 14,896 WEST 9/3/1982 63 45 55 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

TA3CS 01 AC 52,456 WEST 9/4/1997 94 0 94 Depression, L&T Cracking, Weathering

TA4CS 01 PCC 39,241 WEST 9/2/1942 68 39 23

Corner Break, Corner Spalling, Faulting, Joint Seal Damage, Joint Spalling, Large Patch/Utility, LTD Cracking, Shrinkage Cracking

TA5CS 01 PCC 7,561 WEST 9/2/1942 69 29 26 Corner Break, Joint Seal Damage, Joint Spalling, Large Patch/Utility, LTD Cracking

TACS 01 PCC 219,941 WEST 9/2/1942 83 5 56 Corner Spalling, Faulting, Joint Seal Damage, Large Patch/Utility, LTD Cracking

TCLCS 01 PCC 69,773 WEST 9/2/1942 75 47 24

Corner Break, Corner Spalling, Faulting, Joint Seal Damage, Joint Spalling, Large Patch/Utility, LTD Cracking, Shattered Slab, Shrinkage Cracking

Cle Elum Municipal Airport

R07CL 01 AC 142,740 SCNT 6/3/2008 94 0 100 L&T Cracking

T01CL 01 AC 8,920 SCNT 6/3/2008 96 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching

T02CL 01 AC 12,886 SCNT 6/3/2008 96 0 82 Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Swelling

T03CL 01 AC 14,530 SCNT 6/3/2008 94 0 100 L&T Cracking

Colville Municipal Airport

A01CO

01 AC 7,676 EAST 9/2/1993 63 38 42 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Weathering

02 AC 8,785 EAST 9/2/1985 69 0 92 Depression, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Swelling, Weathering


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-19

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI



Colville Municipal Airport

A02CO 01 AC 5,920 EAST 9/2/1972 26 29 63 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

A03CO 01 AC 4,266 EAST 9/2/1985 66 0 100

L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering

02 AC 3,519 EAST 6/2/1999 69 0 96 L&T Cracking, Swelling, Weathering

A04CO

01 AC 53,055 EAST 6/2/2000 75 54 46 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Weathering

02 PCC 1,675 EAST 9/2/2000 51 79 18 Joint Seal Damage, LTD Cracking, Shattered Slab, Shrinkage Cracking

R01CO 01 AC 124,667 EAST 6/3/1999 75 0 100 L&T Cracking

T01CO 01 AC 6,636 EAST 6/3/1999 81 0 91

Depression, L&T Cracking, Swelling

02 AC 10,160 EAST 9/2/2000 39 70 23 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Weathering

T02CO

01 AAC 9,309 EAST 9/1/1993 60 57 20 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Rutting, Swelling, Weathering

02 AAC 14,200 EAST 8/1/1988 4 47 41 Alligator Cracking, Block Cracking, Depression, Rutting, Weathering

03 AAC 8,800 EAST 8/1/1988 22 37 62 Alligator Cracking, Block Cracking, L&T Cracking, Swelling, Weathering

T03CO 01 AC 3,682 EAST 6/3/1999 91 0 100 L&T Cracking

T05CO 01 AC 49,718 EAST 6/2/2000 88 0 98 Depression, L&T Cracking


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-20

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI



Crest Airpark

A01KE 01 AAC 32,257 WEST 9/1/1982 41 49 50 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Rutting, Weathering

R15KE 01 AAC 147,015 WEST 9/1/1986 67 15 85 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Weathering

T01KE 01 AAC 97,769 WEST 9/1/1986 68 0 91 Block Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering

T02KE 01 AAC 58,741 WEST 9/1/1982 44 42 46 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Rutting, Weathering

T03KE 01 AAC 9,570 WEST 9/1/1982 60 0 68 Depression, L&T Cracking, Swelling, Weathering

Darrington Municipal Airport

A01DR 01 AC 42,900 WEST 9/2/1995 92 0 88 Depression, L&T Cracking, Swelling, Weathering

R10DR 01 AC 99,600 WEST 9/2/1995 84 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering

T01DR 01 AC 58,273 WEST 9/2/1995 77 55 44 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Weathering

Davenport Municipal Airport

A01DA 01 AAC 32,191 NCNT 9/1/2000 69 0 93 L&T Cracking, Swelling

A02DA 01 AC 35,200 NCNT 9/3/2003 78 0 100 L&T Cracking

R05DA 01 AAC 124,425 NCNT 9/1/2000 57 55 43 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Swelling

T01DA 01 AC 22,446 NCNT 9/2/2003 84 0 100 L&T Cracking

02 AC 37,230 NCNT 9/3/2009 100 0 0 No distress

T02DA 01 AAC 16,200 NCNT 9/1/2000 76 0 100 L&T Cracking

Deer Park Municipal Airport

A01DP 01 AC 179,410 EAST 8/1/2012 100 0 0 No distress

02 AC 64,870 EAST 8/1/2012 100 0 0 No distress


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-21

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI



Deer Park Municipal Airport


04 PCC 16,380 EAST 7/2/2011 96 92 0 LTD Cracking, Shrinkage Cracking



R04DP 01 AC 194,315 EAST 9/1/2000 81 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling

R16DP 01 AC 457,500 EAST 9/1/2001 86 0 100 L&T Cracking

TA1DP 01 AC 31,500 EAST 9/3/1995 82 0 100 L&T Cracking

TA2DP 01 AC 40,300 EAST 9/3/1995 81 42 58 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking

TA3DP 01 AC 18,470 EAST 9/2/1983 70 21 79 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching

TA4DP 01 AC 51,721 EAST 9/3/1995 73 0 99 Depression, L&T Cracking, Raveling

TA5DP 01 AC 14,526 EAST 9/2/1998 50 66 34 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking

TA6DP 01 AC 24,845 EAST 6/2/2007 92 0 100 L&T Cracking

TA7DP 01 AC 5,000 EAST 6/2/2011 100 0 0 No distress

TADP 01 AC 284,066 EAST 9/1/2001 100 0 0 No distress

TBDP 01 AC 31,197 EAST 7/2/2000 93 0 100 L&T Cracking

TCDP 01 AC 138,590 EAST 9/2/1987 17 49 51

Alligator Cracking, Block Cracking, Weathering


TCDP 03 AC 6,523 EAST 9/2/2000 88 0 100 L&T Cracking

Desert Aire Airport A01MT 01 AAC 39,956 SCNT 9/1/1995 71 0 96 Depression, L&T Cracking, Swelling


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-22

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI



Desert Aire Airport

R10MT 01 AAC 131,976 SCNT 9/1/1995 72 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

T01MT 01 AC 116,483 SCNT 6/2/2008 96 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling

T02MT 01 AC 105,207 SCNT 6/1/2009 99 0 100 L&T Cracking

DeVere Field Airport

A01DV 01 AC 6,750 SCNT 9/2/1976 17 29 63 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Raveling

R08DV 01 AC 52,520 SCNT 9/2/1976 62 7 41 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Swelling, Weathering

Dorothy Scott Airport

A01OV

01 AC 4,875 NCNT 9/2/1991 34 63 23 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Weathering

02 AAC 53,675 NCNT 9/1/1992 25 50 50 Alligator Cracking, Block Cracking, L&T Cracking, Weathering

A02OV 01 PCC 11,250 NCNT 6/2/2008 100 0 0 No distress

R15OV 01 AAC 200,700 NCNT 8/1/1998 79 0 96 L&T Cracking, Swelling, Weathering

T01OV 01 AC 5,270 NCNT 5/2/1985 0 34 66

Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

02 AAC 25,875 NCNT 9/1/1992 24 83 17 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking

T02OV 01 AAC 4,000 NCNT 9/1/1992 0 40 60 Alligator Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

Dorothy Scott Airport

T03OV

01 AAC 39,188 NCNT 9/1/1992 24 82 18 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Weathering

02 AC 3,975 NCNT 5/2/1985 1 26 74 Alligator Cracking, Block Cracking, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-23

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI



Ed Carlson Memorial – South Lewis County Airport

A01TO 01 AC 69,508 WEST 6/1/2007 100 0 0 No distress

R05TO 01 AAC 359,719 WEST 9/1/2004 85 0 100 L&T Cracking


T01TO 01 AC 74,928 WEST 9/2/1943 31 51 49 Alligator Cracking, Block Cracking, L&T Cracking, Weathering

T02TO 01 AC 76,937 WEST 7/2/1975 11 79 8

Patching, Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Rutting, Swelling


T03TO 01 AC 4,980 WEST 9/2/1989 32 82 18 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Rutting

T04TO 01 PCC 3,907 WEST 9/2/1995 7 91 9 Joint Seal Damage, Corner Break, LTD Cracking, Shattered Slab

Elma Municipal Airport

A01EM 01 AC 28,411 WEST 9/1/1960 19 44 56 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Raveling

R25EM


02 AAC 76,858 WEST 9/1/1985 81 31 65 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Swelling

T01EM 01 AAC 6,651 WEST 6/1/1985 69 42 52 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Swelling

Ephrata Municipal Airport

A01EP

01 AC 225,341 SCNT 9/3/1943 56 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching

02 AC 853,161 SCNT 9/3/1943 57 0 99 L&T Cracking, Raveling, Swelling

03 AC 41,173 SCNT 9/3/1943 45 0 71 Block Cracking, L&T Cracking, Shoving, Swelling


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-24

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




A01EP

04 PCC 20,800 SCNT 9/2/1943 9 90 10 Joint Seal Damage, Shattered Slab

05 PCC 20,800 SCNT 9/2/1943 3 91 9 Joint Seal Damage, Shattered Slab

06 AC 15,313 SCNT 9/1/1987 56 0 100 L&T Cracking


08 AC 9,304 SCNT 9/3/1943 48 0 94 Depression, L&T Cracking, Oil Spillage, Patching, Swelling

AHLD03EP 01 AC 21,734 SCNT 6/4/2007 99 0 100 L&T Cracking

AHLD21EP 01 AC 22,049 SCNT 6/4/2007 97 0 100 L&T Cracking

R03EP 01 AAC 153,750 SCNT 6/1/2008 100 0 0 No distress

02 AAC 258,750 SCNT 6/1/2008 100 0 0 No distress

R04EP 01 AC 517,500 SCNT 9/3/1943 57 0 100 Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling

R11EP 01 AC 227,638 SCNT 9/2/2004 89 0 100 L&T Cracking

TA2EP 01 AC 11,850 SCNT 9/3/1995 66 0 100 L&T Cracking

02 AC 1,800 SCNT 6/5/2007 100 0 0 No distress

TAEP 01 AC 34,274 SCNT 6/4/2008 98 0 100 L&T Cracking


TB1EP


02 AC 12,563 SCNT 9/3/1943 39 30 68 Alligator Cracking, Block Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Swelling


TBEP 01 AAC 16,817 SCNT 9/1/2004 85 0 100 L&T Cracking



Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-25

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




TBEP 03 AC 14,741 SCNT 9/3/2004 92 0 100 L&T Cracking

TCEP 01 AC 79,352 SCNT 9/3/1943 62 0 98 L&T Cracking, Raveling, Swelling

Felts Field Airport A01FL

01 AC 6,750 EAST 9/1/1992 78 0 100 L&T Cracking

02 AC 106,102 EAST 9/1/1973 25 39 58 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

03 PCC 2,801 EAST 9/1/1941 0 100 0 Shattered Slab

04 PCC 20,526 EAST 9/1/1941 12 74 4 Joint Seal Damage, LTD Cracking, Scaling, Shattered Slab, Shrinkage Cracking

05 AC 9,865 EAST 9/1/1943 3 42 58 Alligator Cracking, Patching, Raveling

06 AAC 34,305 EAST 9/1/1986 66 23 77 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching

07 AC 19,925 EAST 9/2/1968 25 29 71 Alligator Cracking, Block Cracking, L&T Cracking, Weathering

08 AC 11,452 EAST 9/2/1944 6 55 45 Alligator Cracking, Patching, Raveling

09 AC 73,005 EAST 9/2/1969 27 41 59 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

10 AAC 122,232 EAST 9/1/1984 58 0 100 Bleeding, Block Cracking, L&T Cracking



Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-26

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI



Felts Field Airport

A01FL

12 AC 22,176 EAST 9/1/1965 13 54 46 Alligator Cracking, Block Cracking, L&T Cracking, Rutting, Weathering

13 AC 19,602 EAST 9/1/1972 13 79 21 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking

14 AC 28,544 EAST 9/1/1966 12 69 31 Alligator Cracking, Block Cracking, L&T Cracking

15 AC 35,925 EAST 9/2/1980 32 60 40 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

16 AC 7,800 EAST 9/1/1993 50 38 62 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering

17 AC 12,926 EAST 9/1/1999 65 0 66 Bleeding, L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering

18 AC 16,000 EAST 9/2/2007 94 0 100 L&T Cracking

A02FL 01 AC 30,414 EAST 9/2/1989 64 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

A03FL 01 AC 31,636 EAST 9/2/1999 65 42 58 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Rutting, Weathering

A04FL 01 AC 48,125 EAST 9/2/1995 62 14 86

Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling, Weathering

02 AC 44,993 EAST 9/1/2002 80 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

A05FL 01 AC 16,761 EAST 9/1/1971 32 30 70 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering




A09FL 01 AC 19,756 EAST 9/2/2010 100 0 0 No distress


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-27

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI



Felts Field Airport

R03LFL

01A PCC 224,808 EAST 9/1/1941 69 0 4

Corner Spalling, Faulting, Joint Seal Damage, Joint Spalling, Large Patch/Utility, Scaling, Small Patch

01B PCC 224,808 EAST 9/1/2000 97 10 87 Joint Seal Damage, LTD Cracking, Shrinkage Cracking

01C PCC 224,808 EAST 9/1/1941 73 12 20

Corner Break, Corner Spalling, Faulting, Joint Seal Damage, Joint Spalling, Large Patch/Utility, LTD Cracking, Scaling, Shrinkage Cracking, Small Patch

R03RFL 01 AAC 199,503 EAST 9/1/1992 75 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

TAFL

01 AAC 136,590 EAST 9/1/1992 71 0 100 Bleeding, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering




TBFL




TCFL 01 AAC 26,740 EAST 9/1/1960 15 42 58 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

TDFL 01 PCC 11,937 EAST 9/1/1941 77 0 8 Corner Spalling, Joint Seal Damage, Joint Spalling, Large Patch/Utility, Scaling


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-28

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI



Felts Field Airport TDFL 02 AAC 31,560 EAST 9/1/1985 50 48 52


TEFL 01 AAC 24,956 EAST 9/1/1992 73 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

Ferry County Airport

A01RE

01 PCC 1,600 NCNT 9/2/1980 61 31 14 Joint Seal Damage, LTD Cracking, Scaling, Shrinkage Cracking

02 AC 6,408 NCNT 9/1/2001 66 0 97 L&T Cracking, Raveling, Swelling, Weathering

03 AC 3,150 NCNT 9/1/2004 18 83 17 Alligator Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

R17RE 01 AAC 208,800 NCNT 9/1/1987 47 47 53 Alligator Cracking, Block Cracking, L&T Cracking, Weathering

T01RE 01 AAC 8,970 NCNT 9/1/1987 77 0 100 L&T Cracking

Firstair Field Airport

A01MN 01 AC 5,085 WEST 9/2/1974 38 74 26 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Weathering

A02MN 01 AC 3,968 WEST 9/2/1974 29 56 44 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Weathering

A08MN 01 AC 16,323 WEST 9/2/1974 14 73 27 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering

R07MN 01 AAC 52,635 WEST 9/1/1974 28 58 42


02 AC 16,500 WEST 9/2/1974 39 65 35 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering

T01MN 01 AC 24,797 WEST 9/3/1997 54 63 32 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Rutting, Weathering


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-29

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI



Firstair Field Airport T01MN

02 AC 13,306 WEST 9/2/1984 29 64 22 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling, Rutting, Weathering


04 AC 12,743 WEST 9/2/1980 36 66 28 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling, Rutting

Forks Municipal Airport

A01FO 01 AC 38,343 WEST 9/4/1988 63 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

R04FO 01 AC 180,000 WEST 9/4/1988 46 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling

T01FO 01 AC 106,142 WEST 9/4/1988 45 36 64 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling

Friday Harbor Airport

AFUELFH 01 AC 3,489 WEST 9/3/1986 77 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching

AIAFH 01 AC 5,100 WEST 9/2/1982 41 22 63

Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Oil Spillage, Patching, Weathering

02 AC 17,425 WEST 9/2/1992 50 21 47 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching

ARES1FH 01 AC 24,824 WEST 9/2/1992 88 0 100 L&T Cracking

ARES2FH 01 AC 78,000 WEST 9/3/1993 84 0 100 L&T Cracking

ATERMFH 01 AC 246,924 WEST 9/3/1985 82 24 44 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking

ATRANSFH 01 AC 100,058 WEST 9/3/1985 84 0 100 L&T Cracking

AWASHFH 01 AC 4,000 WEST 9/3/1985 82 0 100 L&T Cracking

R16FH 01 AAC 255,000 WEST 9/1/2004 94 0 100 L&T Cracking


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-30

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI



Friday Harbor Airport

TAFH 01 AC 170,523 WEST 4/3/2012 100 0 0 No distress

02 AC 21,743 WEST 9/3/1985 83 64 32 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking

TGFH 01 AC 8,110 WEST 9/3/1985 76 35 65 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching

THANG1FH

01 AC 86,608 WEST 9/3/1985 89 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering


03 PCC 6,375 WEST 9/2/1996 77 0 43 Joint Seal Damage, Joint Spalling, Scaling

THANG2FH


02 PCC 4,355 WEST 9/2/1982 36 55 13

Corner Break, Corner Spalling, Joint Seal Damage, Joint Spalling, Large Patch/Utility, LTD Cracking

THANG3FH 01 AC 109,596 WEST 9/3/1986 80 0 65 Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching

TIAFH 01 AC 12,918 WEST 9/3/1986 71 29 60 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching

Goldendale Municipal Airport

A03GO 01 AAC 27,401 WEST 7/2/1987 25 0 77 Depression, Raveling

R07GO 01 AAC 147,174 WEST 9/1/2004 84 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

T01GO 01 AAC 41,011 WEST 9/1/2004 77 37 63 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Weathering

T02GO 01 AC 4,627 WEST 9/2/1995 13 34 56 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Rutting, Swelling, Weathering


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-31

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI



Goldendale Municipal Airport

T03GO 01 AC 33,891 WEST 8/1/2005 76 51 49 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

Grand Coulee Dam Airport

A01EC 01 AC 63,103 NCNT 8/1/2005 82 41 59 L&T Cracking, Patching, Rutting

R03EC 01 AC 315,000 NCNT 8/1/2005 86 0 100 L&T Cracking

T01EC 01 AC 8,910 NCNT 8/1/2005 94 0 100 L&T Cracking

T02EC 01 AC 11,613 NCNT 8/1/2005 75 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching

T03EC 01 AC 11,622 NCNT 8/1/2005 86 0 100 L&T Cracking

T04EC 01 AC 14,818 NCNT 6/3/2009 100 0 0 No distress

Grant County International Airport

A01GC

01 APC 430,299 SCNT 9/2/1990 68 0 95 Joint Reflection Cracking, L&T Cracking, Oil Spillage

02 PCC 333,048 SCNT 9/2/1956 8 68 6

Corner Break, Joint Spalling, Joint Seal Damage, LTD Cracking, Shattered Slab, Corner Spalling, Faulting, Large Patch/Utility

03 PCC 32,397 SCNT 9/1/1995 66 66 24

Corner Spalling, Joint Seal Damage, LTD Cracking, Shattered Slab, Shrinkage Cracking


05 PCC 305,084 SCNT 9/2/1956 23 31 41

Corner Spalling, Blow-up, Corner Break, Durability Cracking, Faulting, Joint Seal Damage, Joint Spalling, Large Patch/Utility, LTD Cracking, Shattered Slab, Small Patch


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-32

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




A01GC

06 PCC 100,375 SCNT 9/2/1956 54 36 24

ASR, Corner Break, Joint Seal Damage, Joint Spalling, Large Patch/Utility, LTD Cracking, Scaling, Shattered Slab, Shrinkage Cracking

07 APC 248,322 SCNT 6/1/1990 42 0 100 Block Cracking, Joint Reflection Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching

08 PCC 224,379 SCNT 9/2/1956 56 41 23

ASR, Joint Seal Damage, Large Patch/Utility, LTD Cracking, Shattered Slab, Shrinkage Cracking, Small Patch

09 PCC 347,499 SCNT 9/2/1956 60 61 16

ASR, Joint Seal Damage, Large Patch/Utility, LTD Cracking, Shattered Slab, Shrinkage Cracking, Small Patch

10 AC 173,280 SCNT 9/2/1997 46 0 100 Block Cracking, Joint Reflection Cracking, L&T Cracking

ACOLUMBGC 01 PCC 114,617 SCNT 9/2/1956 88 10 73

Corner Break, Corner Spalling, Joint Seal Damage, Joint Spalling, LTD Cracking, Small Patch

AEASTGC

01 PCC 1,502,205 SCNT 9/2/1955 81 25 56

Corner Break, Corner Spalling, Joint Seal Damage, Joint Spalling, LTD Cracking, Shrinkage Cracking, Small Patch

02 PCC 89,964 SCNT 9/1/2002 97 23 43 Joint Seal Damage, LTD Cracking, Shrinkage Cracking


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-33

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




AEASTGC

03 PCC 53,601 SCNT 9/2/1955 27 80 16

Blow-up, Corner Break, Corner Spalling, Faulting, Joint Seal Damage, Joint Spalling, LTD Cracking, Shattered Slab, Shrinkage Cracking

04 AC 45,266 SCNT 9/2/1955 13 62 38 Alligator Cracking, Block Cracking, L&T Cracking, Weathering

AFUELGC 01 PCC 2,545,615 SCNT 9/2/1956 75 57 6

Joint Seal Damage, Large Patch/Utility, LTD Cracking, Shattered Slab, Shrinkage Cracking, Small Patch

AHANGGC 01 APC 88,490 SCNT 6/2/2009 100 0 0 No distress

AHELIPADGC 01 PCC 625 SCNT 9/1/1997 75 49 39 Joint Seal Damage, LTD Cracking, Shrinkage Cracking

AHLD4GC 01 PCC 119,918 SCNT 9/2/1958 86 36 14

Corner Break, Corner Spalling, Joint Seal Damage, Joint Spalling, Large Patch/Utility, LTD Cracking, Shrinkage Cracking

AHOLD14LGC 01 PCC 220,271 SCNT 9/2/1958 75 86 7

Corner Break, Joint Seal Damage, LTD Cracking, Shattered Slab, Shrinkage Cracking

AMGC

01 AC 19,749 SCNT 6/1/1999 60 0 100 Block Cracking, L&T Cracking

02 AC 92,190 SCNT 6/1/1999 62 9 91 Alligator Cracking, Block Cracking, L&T Cracking


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-34

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




R14LGC

01C PCC 150,472 SCNT 9/2/1958 70 56 38

Corner Break, Corner Spalling, Joint Seal Damage, Large Patch/Utility, LTD Cracking, Shattered Slab, Shrinkage Cracking, Small Patch

01W PCC 451,603 SCNT 9/2/1958 78 64 29 Joint Seal Damage, LTD Cracking, Shrinkage Cracking, Small Patch

02C PCC 49,972 SCNT 9/2/1991 93 0 100 Joint Seal Damage

02OW PCC 50,057 SCNT 9/2/1991 70 61 33 Corner Spalling, Joint Seal Damage, Large Patch/Utility, LTD Cracking, Shattered Slab

02W PCC 99,958 SCNT 9/2/1991 97 0 100 Joint Seal Damage

03C APC 400,045 SCNT 9/1/2005 89 0 100 L&T Cracking

03W APC 1,200,059 SCNT 5/1/2005 87 0 100 L&T Cracking

04C PCC 74,976 SCNT 9/2/1991 81 8 58 Joint Seal Damage, LTD Cracking, Shrinkage Cracking

04OW PCC 39,970 SCNT 9/2/1956 50 76 24 Joint Seal Damage, LTD Cracking, Shattered Slab

04W PCC 184,934 SCNT 9/2/1991 83 32 58 Joint Seal Damage, LTD Cracking, Shrinkage Cracking

R14RGC 01 PCC 235,392 SCNT 9/2/1958 82 91 9 Joint Seal Damage, LTD Cracking

R18GC 01 APC 250,275 SCNT 9/2/1989 72 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling

R22GC 01 PCC 7,500 SCNT 9/2/1958 68 26 18 Joint Seal Damage, Joint Spalling, LTD Cracking, Small Patch


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-35

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




R22GC

05 PCC 7,500 SCNT 9/2/1958 63 79 15 Joint Seal Damage, LTD Cracking, Shattered Slab, Shrinkage Cracking

02C AC 215,929 SCNT 9/3/2001 83 0 100 L&T Cracking

02W AC 215,929 SCNT 6/3/2001 87 0 100 L&T Cracking

03C AAC 55,454 SCNT 5/1/2005 88 0 100 L&T Cracking

03W AAC 55,454 SCNT 5/1/2005 83 0 100 L&T Cracking

04C APC 210,564 SCNT 9/1/2001 83 0 100 L&T Cracking

04W APC 211,335 SCNT 9/1/2001 83 0 100 L&T Cracking

R927GC 01 PCC 309,004 SCNT 6/1/1944 86 11 64 Corner Spalling, Joint Seal Damage, Joint Spalling, LTD Cracking, Scaling, Small Patch

TA1GC 01 PCC 22,837 SCNT 9/2/1956 40 71 13

Corner Spalling, Joint Seal Damage, Large Patch/Utility, LTD Cracking, Shattered Slab, Shrinkage Cracking, Small Patch

TA2GC 01 PCC 19,750 SCNT 9/2/1956 46 56 15

ASR, Corner Spalling, Joint Seal Damage, Large Patch/Utility, LTD Cracking, Shattered Slab, Shrinkage Cracking, Small Patch

TA3GC 01 PCC 19,750 SCNT 9/2/1956 61 48 23

Joint Seal Damage, Large Patch/Utility, LTD Cracking, Shrinkage Cracking, Small Patch

TAGC 01 PCC 31,634 SCNT 9/2/1956 80 58 29 Joint Seal Damage, LTD Cracking, Shrinkage Cracking


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-36

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




TAGC

02 PCC 79,831 SCNT 9/2/1956 64 91 4 Joint Seal Damage, Large Patch/Utility, LTD Cracking, Shattered Slab

03 PCC 294,273 SCNT 9/2/1956 73 85 6 Corner Spalling, Joint Seal Damage, Joint Spalling, LTD Cracking, Shrinkage Cracking

TBGC 01 PCC 200,452 SCNT 9/2/1956 74 49 43

Joint Seal Damage, Large Patch/Utility, LTD Cracking, Shattered Slab, Shrinkage Cracking, Small Patch

TCGC

01 APC 313,333 SCNT 9/2/1989 75 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling

02 PCC 22,791 SCNT 9/2/1958 71 92 6 Joint Seal Damage, LTD Cracking, Shattered Slab, Shrinkage Cracking

TCOMPASSGC 01 PCC 88,633 SCNT 9/2/1991 83 11 47

Corner Break, Joint Seal Damage, Joint Spalling, Large Patch/Utility, LTD Cracking, Scaling, Shrinkage Cracking, Small Patch

TDGC

01 PCC 71,386 SCNT 6/2/2007 98 0 67 Joint Seal Damage, Small Patch

02 PCC 16,392 SCNT 9/2/1958 87 68 15 Joint Seal Damage, LTD Cracking, Shrinkage Cracking, Small Patch

TEGC 01 PCC 115,779 SCNT 9/2/1958 72 54 43 Joint Seal Damage, LTD Cracking, Shrinkage Cracking

TFGC 01 PCC 27,541 SCNT 6/1/1955 67 79 20 Corner Break, Joint Seal Damage, LTD Cracking, Shattered Slab, Small Patch


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-37

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




TFGC

02 PCC 80,067 SCNT 6/1/1955 94 41 23 Corner Spalling, Joint Seal Damage, Joint Spalling, LTD Cracking, Small Patch

03 PCC 41,045 SCNT 6/1/1955 91 10 19

Corner Spalling, Joint Seal Damage, Joint Spalling, Large Patch/Utility, LTD Cracking, Small Patch

04 PCC 16,000 SCNT 6/1/1955 66 41 5

Corner Spalling, Joint Seal Damage, Joint Spalling, Large Patch/Utility, LTD Cracking, Shrinkage Cracking, Small Patch

TG1GC 01 PCC 25,815 SCNT 9/2/1955 85 0 70 Joint Seal Damage, Large Patch/Utility, Shrinkage Cracking, Small Patch

TG2GC 01 PCC 26,075 SCNT 9/2/1955 80 29 57

Corner Break, Corner Spalling, Joint Seal Damage, Joint Spalling, Large Patch/Utility, LTD Cracking, Shrinkage Cracking

TGGC

01 PCC 16,000 SCNT 9/2/1955 77 33 7 Joint Seal Damage, Large Patch/Utility, LTD Cracking, Shrinkage Cracking

02 APC 620,459 SCNT 9/1/1956 31 25 75 Alligator Cracking, Block Cracking, Joint Reflection Cracking, L&T Cracking

03 PCC 40,588 SCNT 9/2/1956 77 51 25 Corner Spalling, Joint Seal Damage, LTD Cracking, Shrinkage Cracking


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-38

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




THGC

01 APC 16,337 SCNT 9/1/1956 30 47 53 Alligator Cracking, Joint Reflection Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching

02 PCC 33,416 SCNT 9/2/1956 83 7 67 Corner Spalling, Joint Seal Damage, Joint Spalling, LTD Cracking

TJ1GC 01 AC 32,117 SCNT 9/3/1998 87 0 100 Joint Reflection Cracking, L&T Cracking



TJGC 01 AC 235,123 SCNT 9/3/1998 92 0 100 L&T Cracking

Grove Field Airport

R07CA 01 AC 110,266 WEST 9/3/1990 89 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

T01CA




T02CA 01 AC 42,126 WEST 10/2/2012 100 0 0 No distress

T03CA

01 AC 32,138 WEST 9/2/1992 82 75 25 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling, Rutting, Weathering

03 AC 10,920 WEST 9/2/1997 69 21 79 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering




Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-39

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI



Harvey Field Airport

A01HF 01 AC 39,845 WEST 9/1/1985 68 43 53 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching

A02HF 01 AC 5,000 WEST 9/1/1985 71 0 98 Depression, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

R15LHF 01 AC 97,152 WEST 9/1/1985 53 48 52 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

TAHF

01 AC 52,866 WEST 9/1/1985 31 73 26 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Rutting, Weathering


TBHF 01 AC 12,626 WEST 9/1/1985 69 54 46 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling, Weathering

TH01HF

01 AC 57,069 WEST 9/1/1985 60 43 39 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Oil Spillage, Raveling, Weathering

02 AC 95,177 WEST 9/1/1985 52 61 28 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Rutting, Weathering

03 AC 57,964 WEST 9/1/2000 91 0 82 Depression, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

04 PCC 7,248 WEST 9/1/1985 5 100 0 Corner Break, LTD Cracking, Shattered Slab

Ione Municipal Airport

A01IO 01 AAC 12,674 EAST 9/1/2002 48 77 12 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking

R15IO 01 AAC 112,099 EAST 9/1/2002 97 0 77 L&T Cracking, Swelling

02 AAC 51,165 EAST 9/1/2002 99 0 100 L&T Cracking


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-40

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI



Ione Municipal Airport

T01IO 01 AC 13,642 EAST 9/3/1970 0 93 7 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Rutting

T02IO 01 AAC 2,651 EAST 9/1/2002 50 57 28 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Swelling, Weathering

Jefferson County International Airport

A01PT 01 AC 118,630 WEST 9/3/1990 87 0 100

Bleeding, L&T Cracking, Weathering


A02PT 01 AC 14,404 WEST 9/3/1996 82 59 40 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering

A03PT 01 AC 12,533 WEST 9/3/1990 78 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering

A04PT 01 AC 6,686 WEST 9/3/1990 85 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

R08PT 01 AC 225,000 WEST 9/3/1990 77 0 75 Bleeding, L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering

T01PT 01 AC 18,269 WEST 9/3/1996 88 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling, Weathering

T02PT 01 AC 3,438 WEST 9/3/1996 95 0 100 Bleeding, L&T Cracking

T03PT 01 AC 4,725 WEST 3/1/2012 100 0 0 No distress

T04PT 01 AC 27,240 WEST 9/3/1995 73 29 70 Alligator Cracking, Bleeding, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling, Weathering

T05PT 01 AC 40,625 WEST 9/3/1999 94 0 100 Weathering

T06PT 01 AC 52,780 WEST 9/3/1996 85 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering



Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-41

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI



Jefferson County International Airport

T08PT 01 AC 11,508 WEST 9/3/1992 77 60 37 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Rutting, Swelling, Weathering

T09PT 01 AC 19,236 WEST 8/4/2012 88 0 100 Bleeding, L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering


T11PT 01 AC 84,905 WEST 6/3/2006 100 0 0 No distress

Lake Chelan Airport

A01CN 01 AC 6,663 NCNT 6/16/1986 59 0 100 Block Cracking, L&T Cracking

A02CN 01 AC 27,448 NCNT 7/2/1987 74 14 86

Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching

03 AC 3,900 NCNT 9/1/1987 7 42 58 Rutting, Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Raveling

A03CN 01 AC 104,951 NCNT 6/17/1986 80 0 66 Depression, L&T Cracking

A04CN 01 AC 6,743 NCNT 6/16/1986 62 26 74 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Weathering

R02CN 01 AC 210,600 NCNT 6/16/1986 62 40 60 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking

T01CN 01 AC 36,953 NCNT 9/2/1997 59 45 47 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Raveling

T02CN 01 AC 21,384 NCNT 7/2/1987 52 67 22

Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking

02 AC 59,771 NCNT 9/2/1997 35 81 14 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Rutting

T03CN 01 AC 30,338 NCNT 9/2/1997 74 72 28 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Rutting

T04CN 01 AC 26,554 NCNT 6/6/2004 100 0 0 No distress

Lind Municipal A01LI 01 AAC 62,939 SCNT 6/1/2005 85 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-42

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI



Lind Municipal Airport

A01LI 02 AC 15,457 SCNT 6/3/2006 100 0 0 No distress

R05LI 01 AC 153,600 SCNT 6/3/2006 84 0 100 L&T Cracking

T01LI 01 AAC 18,500 SCNT 8/1/2005 90 0 97 Depression, L&T Cracking

T02LI 01 AC 3,675 SCNT 6/3/2006 100 0 0 No distress

Lopez Island Airport

A01LO 01 AAC 88,470 WEST 9/1/2012 100 0 0 No distress

AH16LO 01 AC 11,895 WEST 9/3/2012 100 0 0 No distress

R16LO 01 AAC 175,800 WEST 9/1/2003 98 0 100 L&T Cracking

TALO 01 AAC 97,024 WEST 9/1/2012 100 0 0 No distress

TH01LO 01 AC 24,906 WEST 9/3/2003 96 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching

Lynden Municipal Airport

A01LY 01 AC 48,184 WEST 9/3/1996 86 0 91 L&T Cracking, Swelling

A02LY 01 AC 18,794 WEST 9/3/1997 85 0 100 L&T Cracking


R07LY 01 AAC 110,526 WEST 9/1/1989 86 0 100 L&T Cracking

T01LY 01 AC 29,374 WEST 6/3/2000 77 0 100 L&T Cracking

T02LY 01 AC 5,522 WEST 9/3/1996 63 64 36 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching

T03LY 01 AC 4,620 WEST 9/3/1997 78 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching

T04LY 01 APC 4,060 WEST 9/1/1997 72 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

Mansfield Airport

A01MA 01 AC 30,000 NCNT 8/2/1992 68 45 55

Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking

02 AC 5,123 NCNT 8/2/1996 30 60 18 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking

A03MA 01 AC 4,750 NCNT 8/2/1996 46 54 41 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Swelling

A04MA 01 AC 4,750 NCNT 9/2/1996 65 47 53 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-43

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI



Mansfield Airport

R03MA 01 AAC 118,220 NCNT 6/15/1996 76 0 100 L&T Cracking

T01MA 01 AC 5,379 NCNT 9/2/1992 66 61 39 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking

T02MA 01 AC 4,502 NCNT 8/2/1996 65 47 49 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Swelling

Martin Field Airport

A01CP

01 PCC 2,432 SCNT 6/2/1980 23 81 11 Corner Break, Corner Spalling, Joint Seal Damage, Large Patch/Utility, LTD Cracking

02 PCC 2,473 SCNT 6/1/1998 88 0 100 Joint Seal Damage

03 PCC 1,600 SCNT 6/1/1960 0 75 6

Corner Break, Corner Spalling, Faulting, Joint Seal Damage, Joint Spalling, LTD Cracking, Shattered Slab

R05CP


02 AC 150,006 SCNT 6/1/1960 34 31 69 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Rutting, Weathering

T01CP

01 AC 228,502 SCNT 6/1/1960 29 40 59 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Oil Spillage, Raveling, Weathering



Mead Flying Service

A01ME 01 AAC 4,050 EAST 9/1/1979 74 0 99 Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching

A02ME 01 AAC 3,600 EAST 9/1/1979 75 0 58 Depression, L&T Cracking

R16ME 01 AAC 77,100 EAST 9/1/1979 65 37 34 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Rutting


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-44

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI



Mears Field (Concrete) Airport

A01CC 01 AAC 4,593 WEST 9/1/1993 90 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

A02CC 01 AAC 12,000 WEST 9/1/1993 84 0 45 Depression, L&T Cracking, Weathering

A03CC 01 PCC 1,600 WEST 9/1/1997 82 0 0 Shrinkage Cracking, Small Patch

A04CC 01 AAC 4,593 WEST 9/1/1993 71 0 78 Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering

R07CC 01 AAC 6,800 WEST 6/1/1993 88 0 92

L&T Cracking, Swelling, Weathering

02 AAC 154,800 WEST 9/1/1993 80 0 95 L&T Cracking, Raveling, Swelling, Weathering

T01CC 01 AAC 8,810 WEST 9/1/1993 85 0 94 L&T Cracking, Swelling, Weathering

Methow Valley State Airport

A03MV 01 AC 85,000 NCNT 9/3/1996 64 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

A04MV

01 AC 63,343 NCNT 9/1/2003 78 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering

02 AC 35,565 NCNT 9/1/2003 71 31 69 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering

03 AC 6,545 NCNT 9/1/1955 55 45 55 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Weathering

A05MV 01 AC 20,462 NCNT 9/1/1996 59 0 100 L&T Cracking

R13MV 01 AC 406,259 NCNT 9/3/1996 67 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

T01MV 01 AC 20,837 NCNT 9/3/1996 78 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

T02MV 01 AC 20,930 NCNT 9/1/1996 59 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-45

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI



Methow Valley State Airport

T03MV 01 AC 7,051 NCNT 9/3/1996 49 32 68 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling, Weathering

T04MV 01 AC 8,530 NCNT 9/3/1996 69 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

T05MV

01 AC 15,737 NCNT 9/1/1955 4 56 44 Alligator Cracking, Raveling, Rutting

02 AC 13,935 NCNT 9/1/2002 86 42 58 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking


Moses Lake Municipal Airport

A01ML 01 AC 7,000 SCNT 9/2/1989 60 0 76 Depression, L&T Cracking


AHLD16ML 01 AC 8,169 SCNT 5/2/1995 34 64 36 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Rutting

AHLD34ML 01 AC 8,001 SCNT 9/2/1999 71 0 100 L&T Cracking

R16ML

01 AAC 8,225 SCNT 5/1/1995 63 33 64 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking



T01ML

01 AAC 43,334 SCNT 9/1/1989 62 51 49 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking



T02ML

01 AAC 5,573 SCNT 5/1/1995 67 0 98 Depression, L&T Cracking



Ocean Shores A01OS 01 AC 16,443 CSTL 5/3/2008 99 0 100 L&T Cracking


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-46

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI



Ocean Shores Municipal Airport

A02OS 01 AAC 96,648 CSTL 9/1/1995 85 0 34 Depression, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

R15OS 01 AC 134,156 CSTL 9/2/1987 74 0 100


02 AC 25,511 CSTL 5/3/2008 100 0 0 No distress

T01OS

01 AC 8,271 CSTL 9/2/1987 45 40 59 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling, Weathering

02 AC 92,274 CSTL 5/3/2008 99 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling

03 AC 3,309 CSTL 9/2/1987 30 51 41 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

Odessa Municipal Airport

R02OD 01 AAC 91,500 SCNT 9/1/1998 68 0 98 L&T Cracking, Swelling


T01OD 01 AAC 5,249 SCNT 9/1/1998 67 0 62 L&T Cracking, Swelling

T02OD 01 AAC 5,560 SCNT 9/1/1998 75 0 100 L&T Cracking

T03OD 01 AAC 6,370 SCNT 9/1/1998 79 0 100 L&T Cracking

T04OD 01 AC 95,754 SCNT 9/2/2004 45 72 27 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Rutting, Swelling

Okanogan Legion Airport

A01OK 01 AC 57,273 NCNT 9/1/1987 73 33 67 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking

R04OK 01 AC 104,827 NCNT 9/3/1993 43 64 31 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Rutting, Swelling

Olympia Regional Airport

A01OL 01 AC 19,275 WEST 9/1/1937 20 23 70 Block Cracking, Depression, Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Raveling


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-47

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




ACOV1OL 01 AC 41,564 WEST 9/2/1984 68 0 98

Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering


AFISHOL 01 AC 12,358 WEST 9/1/1960 53 33 67 L&T Cracking, Alligator Cracking, Weathering

AGOWOL



04 AC 11,327 WEST 9/1/2005 86 0 100 Patching, Weathering


07 AC 7,743 WEST 9/2/1996 96 0 100 Patching

AH35OL 01 AC 20,006 WEST 9/3/1980 70 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

AHABCOL 01 AC 50,332 WEST 9/3/1996 96 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering

AHDEOL



AHFGHOL 01 AC 48,807 WEST 9/3/1998 97 0 100 L&T Cracking

APEAOL 01 AC 22,471 WEST 9/2/1943 7 39 58 Alligator Cracking, Depression, Oil Spillage, Patching, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

AS8OL 01 AC 5,044 WEST 9/1/1993 88 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

ASPOL 01 AC 97,832 WEST 9/3/1996 90 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

ATERMOL 01 AC 154,848 WEST 9/3/1979 68 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

ATRANSOL 01 AC 235,192 WEST 9/2/1996 91 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-48

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




ATRANSOL 02 AC 5,659 WEST 9/2/1943 49 39 61 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Rutting, Weathering

R08OL

01A AC 65,096 WEST 9/2/1943 42 26 67 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Rutting, Swelling, Weathering

01B AC 33,765 WEST 9/3/1992 91 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

02A AC 439,348 WEST 9/2/1943 40 24 67 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Swelling, Weathering

R17OL


01B AC 82,340 WEST 10/17/2007 100 0 0 No distress

02A AC 75,369 WEST 10/1/2005 97 0 100 L&T Cracking

02B AC 37,515 WEST 10/1/2005 87 0 100 L&T Cracking

03A AAC 66,272 WEST 10/18/2007 100 0 100 Weathering



04B AC 154,557 WEST 10/18/2008 100 0 0 No distress

T03OL 01 AAC 37,973 WEST 9/1/1996 97 0 100 L&T Cracking

TAOL 01 AC 50,963 WEST 9/3/1979 76 0 99

Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering


TBOL






Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-49

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




TCOL 01 AC 92,315 WEST 9/2/1943 12 51 44 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Rutting, Swelling, Raveling

TCOVOL 01 AC 8,060 WEST 9/2/1949 38 30 70 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling

TDOL 01 AC 14,185 WEST 9/3/1979 63 0 71 Depression, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

TEOL 01 AC 147,243 WEST 10/15/2010 100 0 0 No distress

02 AC 107,288 WEST 10/15/2010 99 0 100 Patching

TFOL



03 AC 36,446 WEST 9/3/1979 60 0 100 L&T Cracking, Rutting, Weathering


05 AC 7,468 WEST 10/15/2010 100 0 100 Weathering

TGOL


02 AC 159,101 WEST 9/2/1943 40 44 56 L&T Cracking, Rutting, Alligator Cracking, Patching, Weathering


TH1OL 01 AC 46,750 WEST 10/1/2005 94 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching

THABCOL 01 AC 9,349 WEST 9/2/1996 96 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

THAOL 01 AC 6,260 WEST 9/2/1945 47 37 63 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

THBOL 01 AC 6,260 WEST 9/2/1965 51 26 74 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-50

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




THCOL 01 AC 6,260 WEST 9/2/1949 43 34 66 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

THFOL 01 AC 28,583 WEST 9/1/1960 63 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

THGOL 01 AC 30,448 WEST 9/1/1995 93 0 96

Depression, L&T Cracking, Weathering

02 AC 4,205 WEST 9/1/1989 67 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling, Weathering

THHOL 01 AC 14,803 WEST 9/1/1999 91 0 71 Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering

THIOL 01 AC 40,449 WEST 10/1/2005 100 0 0 No distress

TSOLOYOL 01 AC 51,780 WEST 9/2/2005 100 0 0 No distress

TTERMOL 02 AAC 32,076 WEST 9/1/1979 69 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering

TWOL



03 AC 35,825 WEST 9/2/1943 32 54 42 Depression, L&T Cracking, Rutting, Alligator Cracking, Weathering


Omak Municipal Airport

A01OM 01 AC 66,099 NCNT 9/3/1997 83 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling

A02OM 01 AAC 173,981 NCNT 9/1/1991 66 0 94 Bleeding, Depression, L&T Cracking, Swelling, Weathering

A03OM 01 AC 23,426 NCNT 8/3/2011 100 0 0 No distress

R17OM 01A AAC 331,774 NCNT 9/1/1974 39 25 74

Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Swelling, Weathering

01B AC 350,025 NCNT 9/3/2002 85 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-51

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI



Omak Municipal Airport

R17OM 02A AC 9,094 NCNT 8/3/2011 100 0 0 No distress

03A AC 9,031 NCNT 8/3/2011 100 0 0 No distress

T01OM 01 AC 39,077 NCNT 9/3/1997 69 66 34


02 AAC 52,459 NCNT 9/1/1991 65 0 97 Block Cracking, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Swelling, Weathering

T01OM 03 AC 68,551 NCNT 9/3/1991 46 80 20 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking

T02OM 01 AC 34,486 NCNT 8/3/2011 100 0 0 No distress

T05OM 01 AC 10,724 NCNT 9/3/2002 96 0 100 L&T Cracking

T06OM 01 AC 10,402 NCNT 9/3/2002 88 0 100 L&T Cracking

T07OM 01 AC 29,420 NCNT 8/3/2011 100 0 0 No distress

Orcas Island Airport

A01OR


02 AC 96,602 WEST 9/3/1986 77 79 17 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Oil Spillage, Rutting


A02OR 01 AC 5,301 WEST 9/3/1993 89 0 49 Depression, L&T Cracking

HP01OR 01 PCC 1,600 WEST 6/1/2007 88 0 100 Joint Seal Damage

R16OR 01 AAC 119,400 WEST 9/1/1986 77 0 100 L&T Cracking


TA1OR 01 AC 5,261 WEST 9/3/1994 69 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching

TAOR 01 AAC 67,237 WEST 9/1/1986 78 20 80

Alligator Cracking, Bleeding, L&T Cracking, Patching


THANGOR 01 AC 29,245 WEST 9/3/1990 93 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-52

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI



Othello Municipal Airport

A01OT

01 AC 6,780 SCNT 9/2/1989 67 0 68 Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching

02 AC 3,940 SCNT 9/2/1990 28 39 55 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling

A02OT 01 AC 14,141 SCNT 9/2/1989 84 0 100 L&T Cracking

A03OT 01 PCC 2,500 SCNT 9/2/1989 12 87 13 Joint Seal Damage, Shattered Slab

AHLD7OT 01 AC 5,967 SCNT 6/3/2006 97 0 100 L&T Cracking

R07OT 01 AC 164,700 SCNT 9/2/1976 75 57 43 L&T Cracking, Rutting

TAOT

01 AC 104,210 SCNT 9/2/1976 35 57 43 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling, Rutting



Packwood Airport

A01PA 01 AC 3,249 WEST 8/17/1985 55 32 68 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

R01PA 01 AC 87,165 WEST 8/17/1985 50 54 46 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering

Pangborn Memorial Airport

A01WN

01 AC 18,248 NCNT 6/2/1984 25 25 69 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

02 AC 29,900 NCNT 6/1/2001 69 14 86 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

03 AAC 76,223 NCNT 6/1/1984 29 58 42 Alligator Cracking, Block Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Rutting, Raveling


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-53

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




A01WN

05 AAC 50,565 NCNT 6/1/2001 66 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

06 AAC 59,750 NCNT 6/1/1984 62 0 100 Block Cracking, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

07 AAC 296,518 NCNT 6/1/2001 73 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

08 AC 42,914 NCNT 9/1/1999 67 0 100 Block Cracking, L&T Cracking, Weathering

09 AC 11,802 NCNT 9/1/1999 67 0 100 Block Cracking, L&T Cracking, Weathering

A02WN 02 AC 69,022 NCNT 9/1/1942 25 0 100

L&T Cracking, Patching, Block Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

03 PCC 1,200 NCNT 9/1/1985 88 0 100 Joint Seal Damage

A03WN 01 AC 28,875 NCNT 6/2/1987 54 47 53


02 PCC 4,906 NCNT 9/1/1985 75 0 0 Scaling, Shrinkage Cracking

A04WN 02 AC 28,413 NCNT 9/1/1942 95 0 100 L&T Cracking

AHOLD30WN 01 AC 37,145 NCNT 6/3/2006 96 0 100 L&T Cracking

ATERMWN 01 AC 78,853 NCNT 6/3/1992 64 0 100

Block Cracking, L&T Cracking, Weathering

02 AC 15,400 NCNT 6/3/2001 74 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

R12WN 01A AC 572,951 NCNT 6/3/1999 81 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

R12WN

01B AC 285,016 NCNT 6/3/1999 68 43 57 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

02A AC 60,648 NCNT 6/3/2006 98 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

02B AC 30,000 NCNT 6/3/2006 85 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

TA2WN 01 AC 8,772 NCNT 6/3/1999 90 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-54

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




TA3WN 01 AC 26,103 NCNT 6/1/1999 70 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering


TAWN

01 AC 75,021 NCNT 6/3/2006 95 0 100 L&T Cracking

02 AC 72,779 NCNT 6/2/1987 58 0 61 Bleeding, L&T Cracking, Weathering


04 AC 160,792 NCNT 6/3/2001 65 21 78 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

05 AC 20,745 NCNT 6/3/2001 51 36 64 Alligator Cracking, Block Cracking, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

06 AC 9,117 NCNT 6/3/1999 79 0 75 Depression, L&T Cracking, Raveling

07 AC 10,557 NCNT 10/2/1942 11 76 24 Alligator Cracking, Block Cracking, Rutting, Weathering

TCWN

01 AC 24,135 NCNT 6/2/1978 70 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

02 AC 20,378 NCNT 1/1/1999 89 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering


TFWN


03 AC 42,184 NCNT 9/1/1999 66 39 59 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Swelling, Weathering


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-55

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




TFWN 04 AC 8,522 NCNT 9/1/1978 28 0 100 Block Cracking, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

TGWN





THWN







Pearson Field Airport

A01PE 03 AC 5,785 WEST 9/1/1939 10 37 41 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Raveling

A02PE


02 AC 36,386 WEST 6/2/1986 73 0 92 Block Cracking, L&T Cracking, Oil Spillage, Weathering


04 AC 5,625 WEST 9/1/1986 17 12 88 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Raveling


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-56

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




A03PE 01 AAC 26,565 WEST 9/1/2002 93 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering


A05PE 01 AC 10,250 WEST 5/2/1985 88 0 100 L&T Cracking

A06PE 01 AC 7,675 WEST 6/1/2002 86 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

A07PE 01 AC 42,406 WEST 9/2/2002 87 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

R08PE 01 AAC 203,356 WEST 9/1/1990 70 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

T01PE 01 AAC 41,079 WEST 9/1/1990 80 0 100



T03PE

01 AC 13,229 WEST 9/1/1959 13 36 43 L&T Cracking, Rutting, Swelling, Alligator Cracking, Depression, Raveling


03 AC 6,104 WEST 9/2/2002 59 49 42 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking

T05PE 01 AC 7,297 WEST 9/1/1998 47 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

T06PE 01 AC 31,081 WEST 9/2/2002 85 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

T07PE 01 AC 27,571 WEST 8/11/1999 84 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering


T10PE 01 AC 45,015 WEST 6/2/1986 64 20 80 L&T Cracking, Raveling, Rutting, Weathering


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-57

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




T11PE 02 AC 9,618 WEST 9/1/1991 59 58 42 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Rutting, Weathering

T12PE 01 AC 9,618 WEST 9/1/1997 86 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering



Pierce County Airport – Thun Field

A01TH 01 AC 45,375 WEST 9/2/2002 98 0 100


02 AC 154,872 WEST 9/3/1988 73 0 89 L&T Cracking, Oil Spillage

A02TH 01 AC 155,751 WEST 9/2/1983 70 27 48 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Oil Spillage, Raveling, Weathering

AH1TH 01 AC 10,000 WEST 9/3/1988 77 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

AH2TH 01 AC 24,678 WEST 6/4/2008 100 0 0 No distress

R16TH 01 AC 214,136 WEST 9/3/1988 67 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

T01TH 01 AC 135,585 WEST 9/3/1988 70 25 75



T02TH 01 AC 43,128 WEST 9/2/2002 91 0 27


02 AC 20,399 WEST 9/2/1992 86 30 32 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Weathering

T03TH 01 AC 23,205 WEST 9/2/1992 77 25 75 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-58

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI



Pierce County Airport – Thun Field

T03TH 02 AC 44,960 WEST 9/2/1990 75 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering

Port of Ilwaco Airport

A01IL 01 AAC 4,095 CSTL 8/1/2005 99 0 100 Weathering

A02IL 01 AAC 2,500 CSTL 8/1/2005 97 0 100 Weathering

R10IL 01 AAC 103,500 CSTL 8/2/2005 99 0 100 Weathering

Port of Whitman Business Air Center Airport

A01CF 01 AC 4,859 EAST 6/4/2007 100 0 0 No distress


A02CF 01 AC 6,387 EAST 6/4/2007 100 0 0 No distress

R07CF

01 AAC 26,500 EAST 9/1/2001 51 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling



T01CF 01 AC 107,384 EAST 6/4/2007 100 0 0 No distress


T03CF 01 AAC 2,985 EAST 9/1/2004 64 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling


T05CF 01 AAC 13,967 EAST 9/1/2004 72 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling

Prosser Airport

A01PR 01 AC 13,560 SCNT 9/2/1991 68 37 63

L&T Cracking, Patching, Rutting, Weathering

02 AC 12,840 SCNT 9/2/1995 82 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

A02PR

01 AAC 41,870 SCNT 9/1/1995 77 0 92 L&T Cracking, Oil Spillage, Weathering


03 PCC 1,600 SCNT 9/2/1995 79 0 46 Joint Seal Damage, Shrinkage Cracking

A03PR 01 AC 55,926 SCNT 9/1/2003 86 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-59

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI



Prosser Airport

A03PR




A04PR 01 AC 179,296 SCNT 9/1/2003 79 0 92 L&T Cracking, Oil Spillage, Patching, Weathering

A05PR 01 AC 5,375 SCNT 6/1/2010 100 0 0 No distress

R07PR 01 AAC 143,179 SCNT 9/1/1995 82 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching


T01PR 01 AAC 5,070 SCNT 9/1/1995 80 0 100 L&T Cracking

T02PR 01 AAC 85,701 SCNT 9/1/1995 89 0 100

L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling


T03PR 01 AAC 1,972 SCNT 9/1/1995 78 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

T04PR 01 AC 18,683 SCNT 6/3/2010 100 0 0 No distress

Pru Field Airport

A01RZ 01 AC 67,503 SCNT 9/2/1998 65 17 81 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Swelling

R01RZ 01 AAC 164,400 SCNT 10/1/1999 66 49 51 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking

T01RZ 01 AAC 97,995 SCNT 9/1/1999 76 0 34 L&T Cracking, Swelling

02 AAC 23,288 SCNT 10/1/1999 74 0 74 L&T Cracking, Swelling

T02RZ 01 AC 6,183 SCNT 10/1/1999 80 0 100 L&T Cracking

Pullman – Moscow Regional Airport

A01PM 01 AAC 93,134 EAST 9/1/2003 85 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching

A02PM

01 AC 58,963 EAST 6/3/1995 62 0 59 Bleeding, L&T Cracking, Patching

02 AAC 120,521 EAST 9/1/2004 98 0 63 L&T Cracking, Oil Spillage

03 AC 137,290 EAST 6/2/2005 94 0 99 Bleeding, Patching


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-60

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI



Pullman – Moscow Regional Airport

A02PM 04 PCC 3,600 EAST 6/1/2010 98 0 100 Joint Seal Damage

A03PM 01 AC 24,750 EAST 7/1/2006 93 0 100 L&T Cracking

02 AC 20,250 EAST 7/1/2006 88 0 98 Depression, L&T Cracking

AHP23PM 01 AC 6,662 EAST 1/1/1995 83 0 100 L&T Cracking

R05PM

01A AAC 22,500 EAST 7/11/2012 100 0 0 No distress

01B AAC 22,500 EAST 7/11/2012 100 0 0 No distress





T01PM 01 AAC 109,352 EAST 1/1/1995 74 0 100

L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling

02 AAC 253,509 EAST 1/1/1995 72 26 74 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling

T02PM 01 AAC 9,120 EAST 1/1/1995 78 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling

T03PM 01 AAC 10,320 EAST 1/1/1995 71 0 100 L&T Cracking

Quillayute Airport

A01QU 01 PCC 528,750 WEST 9/2/1943 72 38 25

Corner Spalling, Faulting, Joint Seal Damage, Joint Spalling, Large Patch/Utility, LTD Cracking, Shattered Slab, Small Patch

R04QU 01 PCC 421,250 WEST 9/3/1943 71 29 39

Corner Spalling, Faulting, Joint Seal Damage, Joint Spalling, Large Patch/Utility, LTD Cracking, Shrinkage Cracking, Small Patch


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-61

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI



Quillayute Airport

T01QU 01 PCC 59,363 WEST 9/3/1943 63 56 22

Corner Spalling, Faulting, Joint Seal Damage, Joint Spalling, Large Patch/Utility, LTD Cracking, Small Patch

T02QU 01 PCC 157,739 WEST 9/2/1943 69 22 25

Corner Spalling, Faulting, Joint Seal Damage, Joint Spalling, Large Patch/Utility, LTD Cracking, Small Patch

T03QU 01 PCC 118,965 WEST 9/3/1943 58 27 25

Corner Break, Faulting, Joint Seal Damage, Joint Spalling, Large Patch/Utility, LTD Cracking, Small Patch

Quincy Municipal Airport

A01QC

01 AC 29,823 SCNT 9/2/1979 49 73 21 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Rutting

02 AAC 17,050 SCNT 9/1/2005 91 0 86 L&T Cracking, Oil Spillage


R09QC 01 AAC 174,880 SCNT 8/1/2004 75 0 100 L&T Cracking

T01QC 01 AAC 71,816 SCNT 8/1/2005 87 0 100 L&T Cracking

Ranger Creek State Airport

R15RC 01 AC 86,700 WEST 9/1/1986 41 43 29 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Swelling, Weathering

Renton Municipal Airport

ABRN 01 AC 89,813 WEST 9/2/1990 66 48 52 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Rutting, Weathering

ACUSTRN 01 AC 14,933 WEST 6/1/1986 54 28 65

Alligator Cracking, Block Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling, Weathering

ADUSTRN 01 AC 19,338 WEST 1/1/2002 97 0 100 Patching


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-62

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




AH16RN 01 AAC 4,789 WEST 9/1/2002 89 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching


AH34RN 01 AAC 6,722 WEST 9/1/2002 92 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching

R16RN

01A AAC 445,684 WEST 9/2/2009 100 0 0 No distress




03A PCC 105,000 WEST 9/1/1955 92 72 0

Corner Break, Corner Spalling, Large Patch/Utility, LTD Cracking, Shattered Slab, Shrinkage Cracking, Small Patch

03B PCC 63,000 WEST 9/1/1955 98 0 0 Corner Spalling, Faulting, Joint Spalling, Scaling, Small Patch

TARN

01 AAC 224,277 WEST 9/1/2002 79 56 44 L&T Cracking, Patching, Rutting, Weathering

02 AAC 20,695 WEST 6/1/2002 72 76 24 L&T Cracking, Rutting

03 AAC 32,861 WEST 9/1/2002 75 97 3 Alligator Cracking, Raveling, Rutting, Weathering

04 AAC 5,015 WEST 6/1/2002 64 100 0 Rutting

05 AAC 24,555 WEST 9/1/2002 72 91 9 Patching, Rutting

TBRN


02 AC 2,474 WEST 9/2/1972 11 70 23 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Weathering



Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-63

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




TBRN


05 AC 91,698 WEST 9/2/1990 56 63 37 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Rutting, Weathering


TDRN 01 AAC 4,688 WEST 9/2/2009 100 0 0 No distress


TEASTRN 01 AC 78,837 WEST 6/2/1980 22 45 35

Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling, Weathering


TERN 01 AAC 10,455 WEST 9/2/2009 100 0 0 No distress


TFRN 01 AAC 4,298 WEST 9/2/2009 100 0 0 No distress


TGRN 01 AAC 8,702 WEST 9/2/2009 100 0 0 No distress

02 AAC 9,006 WEST 9/1/2002 91 0 53 Depression, L&T Cracking

THANGRN 01 AC 45,085 WEST 9/2/1998 93 0 95 Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling, Weathering

THRN 01 AAC 11,912 WEST 9/2/2009 93 0 0 Depression

02 AAC 8,986 WEST 9/1/2002 96 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling

TKRN 01 AAC 9,106 WEST 9/2/2009 100 0 0 No distress

02 AC 10,816 WEST 9/2/1989 74 0 91 Depression, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

TLRN 01 AAC 15,269 WEST 9/2/2009 100 0 0 No distress


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-64

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




TLRN 02 AAC 5,576 WEST 9/1/2002 79 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

TMRN 01 AAC 8,250 WEST 9/2/2009 100 0 0 No distress

TNRN 01 AAC 13,625 WEST 9/2/2009 100 0 0 No distress


TVLRN 01 AC 269,574 WEST 9/2/1972 73 24 76 Alligator Cracking, Block Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling, Weathering

TWESTRN 01 AC 21,840 WEST 6/2/2001 90 0 97 Depression, L&T Cracking, Weathering

Richland Airport

A01RI 01 AAC 119,361 SCNT 9/1/2002 87 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering

A02RI

01 AAC 56,952 SCNT 9/1/2002 89 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering



05 AAC 21,180 SCNT 9/1/1992 63 0 97 L&T Cracking, Oil Spillage, Raveling

06 AC 6,341 SCNT 5/3/1999 71 46 54 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Weathering

07 AC 74,566 SCNT 9/2/1990 66 17 79 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Oil Spillage, Patching, Weathering

08 AAC 5,117 SCNT 9/1/2002 57 50 50 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Weathering


A03RI 01 AAC 21,219 SCNT 9/1/2002 94 0 100 Weathering


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-65

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI



Richland Airport

A03RI 02 AC 5,550 SCNT 9/1/1997 55 43 57



A04RI

01 AAC 16,849 SCNT 5/1/1999 76 35 65 L&T Cracking, Patching, Rutting, Weathering

02 AAC 140,710 SCNT 5/1/1999 73 42 58 L&T Cracking, Patching, Rutting, Weathering

03 AAC 34,201 SCNT 5/1/1999 82 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering

04 AC 101,618 SCNT 5/3/1999 82 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering

R01RI 01 AC 299,925 SCNT 6/2/2008 100 0 0 No distress

R08RI




T01RI 01 AC 68,880 SCNT 9/2/1990 77 0 100



T02RI 01 AC 20,311 SCNT 8/1/2004 94 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

TA2RI 01 AC 5,673 SCNT 6/2/2008 100 0 0 No distress




TA4RI


02 AC 6,398 SCNT 6/1/2003 83 0 95 Bleeding, L&T Cracking, Weathering


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-66

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI



Richland Airport



TARI


02 AC 148,256 SCNT 6/1/2003 90 0 100 Bleeding, L&T Cracking, Weathering




TB2RI 01 AC 4,938 SCNT 6/2/2009 100 0 0 No distress


TB3RI 01 AC 4,504 SCNT 6/2/2009 100 0 0 No distress


TBRI

01 AC 43,399 SCNT 9/2/1990 81 31 69 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking






TCRI 01 AC 16,918 SCNT 9/3/1977 85 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering


TDRI 01 AC 30,548 SCNT 9/2/1979 72 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling


Rosalia Municipal Airport

A01RO 01 AAC 57,371 EAST 6/1/2011 100 0 0 No distress

R02RO 01 AC 112,000 EAST 6/3/2008 100 0 0 No distress


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-67

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI



Rosalia Municipal Airport

T01RO 01 AAC 92,060 EAST 6/1/2008 100 0 100 L&T Cracking

T02RO 01 AAC 5,596 EAST 6/1/2008 100 0 0 No distress

Sand Canyon Airport

A01CH 01 AAC 60,000 EAST 9/1/1995 58 84 16 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking

A02CH 01 AC 4,000 EAST 9/2/1974 17 40 60 Alligator Cracking, Block Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

R17CH 01 AAC 163,035 EAST 10/1/1999 70 0 100 L&T Cracking

T01CH 01 AC 109,379 EAST 6/2/1976 24 71 29 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Raveling

T02CH 01 AAC 1,710 EAST 9/1/1999 54 58 42 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking

T03CH 01 AAC 1,890 EAST 9/1/1999 40 67 33 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking

T04CH 01 AC 2,878 EAST 10/2/1999 61 43 57 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Weathering

T05CH 01 AC 1,710 EAST 9/1/2001 48 73 27 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking

Sanderson Field Airport

A01SH 01 PCC 300,500 WEST 7/2/1943 64 32 29

Corner Spalling, Faulting, Joint Seal Damage, Joint Spalling, Large Patch/Utility, LTD Cracking, Scaling, Shattered Slab, Shrinkage Cracking, Small Patch

A02SH





Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-68

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




R05SH 01 AAC 503,200 WEST 9/1/1992 83 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

T01SH 01 AC 113,268 WEST 7/2/1943 78 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling

T02SH 01 AC 13,672 WEST 7/2/1943 80 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling

T03SH 01 AC 13,611 WEST 7/2/1943 67 0 98 L&T Cracking, Raveling, Swelling

T05SH 01 AC 7,800 WEST 9/2/1979 65 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling, Weathering

T06SH 01 AC 10,396 WEST 9/2/1979 42 33 54 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling, Weathering

T07SH 01 AC 9,636 WEST 9/2/1995 73 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering


T09SH 01 AC 38,543 WEST 7/2/2003 78 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling, Weathering


T11SH 01 AC 19,586 WEST 7/2/1943 67 0 98 Depression, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Swelling

TA1SH 01 AC 67,020 WEST 7/2/1943 54 34 66

Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling

02 AAC 83,821 WEST 9/1/1992 88 0 100 Bleeding, L&T Cracking, Weathering

TA3SH 01 AAC 16,399 WEST 9/1/1992 83 0 97 Bleeding, L&T Cracking, Weathering

TA4SH 01 AAC 26,537 WEST 9/1/1992 77 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-69

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




TA5SH 01 AC 11,463 WEST 7/2/1943 64 16 84

Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Raveling


TASH 01 AAC 229,661 WEST 9/1/1992 85 0 98 Bleeding, L&T Cracking, Weathering

TBSH 01 AAC 66,485 WEST 9/1/1992 90 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

Sekiu Airport

A01SI 01 AC 9,750 WEST 9/2/1979 30 23 46 Alligator Cracking, Depression, Patching, Raveling, Swelling

A02SI 01 AC 5,250 WEST 9/2/1972 39 0 75 Block Cracking, Depression, Raveling

A03SI


02 AC 18,499 WEST 9/2/1972 0 49 35 Alligator Cracking, Depression, Raveling


R08SI 01 AAC 56,400 WEST 7/1/1987 43 0 85

Depression, L&T Cracking, Raveling

02 AAC 135,300 WEST 7/1/1987 16 48 52 Alligator Cracking, Block Cracking, Raveling, Rutting

Sequim Valley Airport

A01SE 01 AAC 3,936 WEST 7/1/1997 82 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

A02SE

01 AC 45,201 WEST 8/2/1985 18 96 0 Alligator Cracking, Bleeding, Depression, Rutting

02 AC 32,042 WEST 8/2/1985 39 84 16 Alligator Cracking, Raveling

03 AC 5,447 WEST 8/2/1985 16 38 62 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Rutting

A03SE 01 AAC 4,593 WEST 7/1/1997 84 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-70

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI



Sequim Valley Airport

R09SE 01 AAC 140,000 WEST 7/1/1997 78 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling

T01SE 01 AC 17,777 WEST 8/2/1985 39 89 11 Alligator Cracking, Bleeding, L&T Cracking, Raveling

Shady Acres Airport R16SP 01 AC 37,857 WEST 8/2/1999 94 0 100 Weathering

Skagit Regional Airport

A01SK 01 AC 67,110 WEST 5/15/1992 93 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching

A02SK 01 AAC 230,874 WEST 6/15/1991 98 0 100 L&T Cracking

A03SK 01 AC 53,232 WEST 10/4/1999 99 0 100 L&T Cracking




AASK




ADSK 01 AC 38,807 WEST 9/3/1990 98 0 100 L&T Cracking


AESK 01 AC 20,880 WEST 5/15/1992 89 0 100 L&T Cracking


AH1SK 01 AC 28,878 WEST 6/15/1991 97 0 100 L&T Cracking

AH2SK 01 AC 42,475 WEST 9/3/2012 100 0 0 No distress

R04SK

01 AC 138,674 WEST 9/3/1942 16 77 23 Alligator Cracking, Block Cracking, Weathering




Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-71

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




R10SK 01 AAC 548,950 WEST 9/1/2011 100 0 0 No distress

T02SK 01 AC 31,525 WEST 9/1/2003 92 0 100 L&T Cracking

T03SK 01 AC 25,223 WEST 6/15/1991 100 0 100 Weathering

T04SK 01 AC 21,137 WEST 6/15/1991 81 27 73 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking

T04SK 02 AC 17,176 WEST 6/4/1942 24 74 26 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking

T05SK 01 AC 33,185 WEST 8/4/1993 95 0 73 L&T Cracking, Oil Spillage

T06SK 01 AC 107,234 WEST 5/15/1992 89 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering

T07SK 01 AC 43,275 WEST 8/3/2008 100 0 0 No distress

TASK




TCSK 01 AC 28,267 WEST 9/3/2012 100 0 0 No distress

TDSK 01 AC 28,216 WEST 9/3/2012 100 0 0 No distress

TESK


02 AC 29,649 WEST 10/3/1999 99 0 100 Patching








Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-72

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




TFSK 01 AC 283,614 WEST 9/3/1942 24 75 25

Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Rutting, Weathering


Snohomish County Airport (Paine Field)

AARMYPF


02 PCC 202,325 WEST 9/2/1942 68 12 27 Corner Spalling, Joint Seal Damage, Large Patch/Utility, LTD Cracking, Small Patch



06 AAC 65,133 WEST 1/1/1963 24 12 88 Alligator Cracking, Block Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling

07 APC 100,651 WEST 9/3/1990 54 30 60 L&T Cracking, Oil Spillage, Patching, Raveling, Rutting, Weathering

08 PCC 55,858 WEST 9/2/1942 59 62 19

Joint Spalling, Joint Seal Damage, LTD Cracking, Shrinkage Cracking, Small Patch

ABTRPF 01 AAC 66,833 WEST 6/1/1989 98 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

02 AC 19,360 WEST 9/2/1959 11 81 19 Alligator Cracking, Weathering

ACENTPF 01 AC 103,696 WEST 3/3/1984 74 32 68




Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-73

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




ACENTPF


04 AAC 37,979 WEST 5/18/1985 94 0 68 L&T Cracking, Oil Spillage, Patching

05 AC 82,220 WEST 2/3/1965 54 75 17

Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Oil Spillage, Raveling, Rutting, Swelling, Weathering

ACHPF


02 AC 91,850 WEST 6/3/1972 27 66 34 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Rutting, Raveling

03 AC 197,703 WEST 11/17/1960 15 44 56 L&T Cracking, Patching, Alligator Cracking, Block Cracking, Raveling, Rutting

04 AC 57,408 WEST 2/3/1965 15 56 44 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Rutting, Raveling

05 AC 65,347 WEST 9/17/1967 15 69 30 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Rutting, Raveling

ACTPF 01 AAC 224,888 WEST 6/1/1989 71 41 59 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Weathering

AEHPF 01 AC 183,451 WEST 9/2/1988 91 28 14 Depression, Patching, Rutting

AERPF 01 AC 179,180 WEST 1/2/1986 64 0 57 Depression, L&T Cracking, Oil Spillage, Patching, Weathering

AFLIGHTPF 01 PCC 51,958 WEST 6/3/2006 100 0 0 No distress


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-74

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




AFUELPF 01 PCC 3,600 WEST 9/2/1994 46 62 16 ASR, Joint Seal Damage, LTD Cracking, Shattered Slab, Shrinkage Cracking

AH16LPF 01 AC 5,261 WEST 5/3/1985 85 0 74 Depression, L&T Cracking

AH34RPF 01 AAC 5,268 WEST 6/1/2009 100 0 0 No distress


AHA4PF 01 AAC 7,200 WEST 6/1/2009 100 0 0 No distress

AITRPF

01 AAC 31,411 WEST 6/1/1989 81 59 34 L&T Cracking, Oil Spillage, Raveling, Rutting

02 AAC 236,752 WEST 6/1/1989 86 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling, Weathering

03 AAC 12,061 WEST 6/1/1989 82 55 45 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Rutting



AMESSPF

01 AC 24,256 WEST 2/3/1965 57 0 100 Depression, L&T Cracking, Weathering

02 APC 15,422 WEST 2/1/1965 39 27 66

Bleeding, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Swelling, Alligator Cracking, Depression, Joint Reflection Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

AMESSPF 03 PCC 23,057 WEST 9/2/1942 65 19 25

Corner Spalling, Joint Spalling, Joint Seal Damage, Large Patch/Utility, LTD Cracking, Small Patch

ANFUELPF 01 AC 25,425 WEST 9/2/1993 85 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-75

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




ANRPF

01 AC 20,726 WEST 9/2/1979 15 66 32 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Rutting

02 AC 9,508 WEST 9/2/1979 46 52 34 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Rutting


04 AC 49,050 WEST 9/2/1994 77 56 26 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling, Rutting

05 AAC 49,667 WEST 9/1/1991 67 64 36 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering

06 AC 7,000 WEST 9/2/1980 32 68 19 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Oil Spillage, Raveling, Rutting

07 APC 6,343 WEST 6/1/1991 58 0 100 Joint Reflection Cracking, Patching, Weathering



10 AC 4,195 WEST 9/2/1991 59 47 25 Alligator Cracking, Bleeding, Block Cracking

11 AC 2,976 WEST 9/2/1994 42 21 54 Depression, Patching, Raveling, Rutting, Weathering

12 AC 4,375 WEST 9/2/1991 55 13 87 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Raveling


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-76

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




ANRPF


14 APC 18,122 WEST 9/1/1991 73 0 100 Joint Reflection Cracking, L&T Cracking, Weathering

15 APC 22,500 WEST 9/1/1991 68 28 72 Alligator Cracking, Joint Reflection Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering

16 APC 6,480 WEST 9/1/1991 50 0 100 Joint Reflection Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering

AOTRPF

01 AAC 153,657 WEST 3/1/1984 38 56 44 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Weathering

02 AAC 5,340 WEST 6/1/1989 81 0 100 Patching, Weathering


ASRPF 01 AAC 14,386 WEST 6/1/1989 16 49 51 Alligator Cracking, Block Cracking, Raveling

ATRPF 01 AC 76,636 WEST 6/1/2004 84 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

AWASHEPF 01 PCC 1,600 WEST 9/2/1988 0 92 8 Joint Seal Damage, LTD Cracking, Shattered Slab

AWRPF

01 AC 267,348 WEST 9/2/1982 81 51 49 Alligator Cracking, Block Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Rutting, Weathering

02 PCC 48,567 WEST 9/2/1994 30 88 10

Corner Break, Corner Spalling, Joint Seal Damage, Large Patch/Utility, LTD Cracking, Shattered Slab, Small Patch

03 AC 145,490 WEST 9/2/1996 92 0 59 Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering



Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-77

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




AWRPF

05 AC 4,817 WEST 9/2/1996 31 64 34 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Rutting, Swelling

06 AAC 64,012 WEST 3/1/1984 54 0 96 Block Cracking, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Swelling

07 AAC 68,118 WEST 1/1/1956 33 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling

R11PF 01 AC 313,533 WEST 8/8/1995 91 52 48 L&T Cracking, Rutting, Weathering

R16LPF 01 AC 225,000 WEST 1/3/1986 20 76 24 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Rutting, Weathering

R16RPF

01A AAC 30,000 WEST 6/2/1994 72 21 79 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering

01B AAC 15,000 WEST 6/2/1994 81 0 97 L&T Cracking, Patching, Swelling, Weathering

02A PCC 76,125 WEST 6/3/2009 100 0 0 No distress

02B PCC 76,125 WEST 6/3/2009 100 0 0 No distress

03A AC 14,500 WEST 6/5/2009 92 0 100 L&T Cracking

03B AC 7,250 WEST 6/5/2009 95 0 100 L&T Cracking



04D AAC 64,900 WEST 6/1/2009 81 0 100 L&T Cracking

05A AAC 40,000 WEST 6/1/2009 89 0 43 L&T Cracking, Swelling


05D AAC 4,400 WEST 6/1/2009 92 0 100 L&T Cracking


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-78

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




R16RPF

06A AC 111,205 WEST 5/8/1996 61 54 42 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling, Swelling, Weathering

06B AC 37,049 WEST 5/8/1996 79 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

06D AC 39,250 WEST 6/2/1996 79 43 57 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Weathering

07A AC 43,124 WEST 6/2/2000 87 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering

07B AC 21,836 WEST 6/2/2000 87 0 100 Bleeding, L&T Cracking, Weathering

TA1PF 01 PCC 122,167 WEST 9/1/2000 100 0 0 No distress

TA2PF 01 AAC 15,036 WEST 6/1/2009 100 0 0 No distress


TA3PF 01 AC 65,109 WEST 8/3/2011 100 0 0 No distress






TA6PF








Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-79

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI







TA8PF 01 APC 32,300 WEST 6/1/2009 100 0 0 No distress

02 APC 24,431 WEST 6/1/2009 100 0 0 No distress

TA9PF

01 AAC 15,493 WEST 5/1/1996 57 55 45 Alligator Cracking, Bleeding, L&T Cracking, Rutting




05 AC 2,183 WEST 7/2/1993 58 0 92 Bleeding, L&T Cracking, Weathering


TAAPF 01 PCC 64,966 WEST 1/1/1967 74 84 7 Shattered Slab, Joint Seal Damage, LTD Cracking, Small Patch

TAAPF 02 AAC 2,790 WEST 6/1/1994 54 0 91

L&T Cracking, Swelling, Weathering

03 AAC 5,157 WEST 9/1/1994 62 54 39 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Swelling, Weathering

TAPF







Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-80

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




TAPF




















TBPF

01 AAC 64,637 WEST 9/1/1991 48 39 61 Alligator Cracking, Bleeding, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling, Weathering

03 AAC 4,761 WEST 3/1/1984 36 56 28 Alligator Cracking, Bleeding, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Rutting, Weathering


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-81

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




TCPF




06 AAC 10,682 WEST 9/1/1985 26 63 24 Alligator Cracking, Bleeding, Depression, L&T Cracking, Weathering

TD0PF




TD1PF 01 AAC 11,600 WEST 6/1/1989 84 0 100 L&T Cracking

TD2PF 01 AAC 6,432 WEST 6/1/1989 94 0 100 L&T Cracking


TD3PF 01 AAC 5,415 WEST 6/1/1989 80 0 50 Depression, L&T Cracking, Raveling

TD4PF 01 AAC 5,460 WEST 6/1/1989 74 0 74 Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling

TD5PF 01 AAC 16,743 WEST 9/1/1958 37 0 89 Block Cracking, Depression, Patching, Weathering

TDPF

01 AAC 23,723 WEST 6/1/1989 77 0 89 Bleeding, L&T Cracking, Patching


03 AAC 39,028 WEST 6/1/1989 99 0 100 Raveling

04 AC 6,600 WEST 6/2/1962 14 53 47 L&T Cracking, Patching, Rutting, Alligator Cracking, Raveling


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-82

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




TDPF



07 AAC 35,703 WEST 6/1/1989 40 63 37 Alligator Cracking, Block Cracking

TEPF 01 AAC 158,027 WEST 6/1/1989 70 24 73

Bleeding, Depression, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Rutting, Swelling


TF2PF 01 AC 6,263 WEST 2/4/1991 54 0 75 Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling

TF4PF 01 AAC 9,444 WEST 6/1/2009 100 0 0 No distress

TFPF

01 AC 46,698 WEST 2/4/1991 83 34 66 L&T Cracking, Rutting

02 AC 44,765 WEST 2/4/1991 74 55 45 L&T Cracking, Patching, Rutting, Weathering


04 AC 14,892 WEST 2/26/1995 90 0 86 L&T Cracking, Raveling, Swelling

TG1PF 01 AC 4,757 WEST 2/3/1985 35 46 33 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching

TG2PF 01 AC 5,925 WEST 2/3/1985 59 31 69 L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling, Rutting

TG3PF 01 AAC 11,647 WEST 6/1/2009 97 0 100 L&T Cracking

TG4PF 01 AC 8,426 WEST 2/3/1985 86 0 100 L&T Cracking

TG5PF 01 AC 5,925 WEST 2/3/1985 47 33 53 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-83

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




TG6PF 01 AC 9,498 WEST 2/3/1985 77 0 72 Depression, L&T Cracking


TGPF 01 AC 50,026 WEST 2/3/1985 75 67 33

Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Rutting


THPF 01 AAC 3,669 WEST 1/1/1956 52 0 100 Block Cracking, Raveling

THPF 02 AAC 70,560 WEST 3/1/1984 42 45 52 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling, Rutting, Swelling

TINTPF


02 AAC 25,065 WEST 6/1/1989 82 28 68 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Swelling, Weathering

TK1PF 01 PCC 95,000 WEST 6/3/2006 100 0 0 No distress

TK7PF 01 AC 72,186 WEST 6/3/2009 100 0 0 No distress

TKNPF 01 PCC 146,644 WEST 9/3/2009 100 0 0 No distress

TW1PF 01 AC 5,001 WEST 6/3/2004 96 0 100

Joint Reflection Cracking, Weathering


TWPF 01 AC 58,370 WEST 6/3/2004 100 0 0 No distress

Southwest Washington Regional Airport

A01KL 01 AAC 26,989 WEST 9/1/1989 73 0 100 L&T Cracking

A02KL



03 AC 6,914 WEST 9/2/1983 15 0 62 Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling, Weathering


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-84

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




A02KL

04 PCC 4,506 WEST 9/2/1983 26 64 11 Corner Break, Joint Seal Damage, Large Patch/Utility, LTD Cracking, Shattered Slab



A03KL 01 AC 113,424 WEST 9/3/1995 97 0 100 L&T Cracking

R12KL 01 AC 430,500 WEST 8/3/1983 79 0 100 L&T Cracking

02 AC 9,000 WEST 8/2/1983 73 38 58 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Swelling

T01KL 01 AC 11,083 WEST 8/2/1983 73 0 100 L&T Cracking

T02KL


02 AAC 27,034 WEST 9/1/1989 79 0 83 Depression, L&T Cracking, Weathering

03 AAC 6,600 WEST 9/1/1989 33 36 60 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

T03KL 01 AAC 3,947 WEST 9/1/1989 75 0 100 L&T Cracking

T04KL 01 AC 6,086 WEST 8/3/1983 64 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling

T05KL 01 AC 11,953 WEST 9/2/1995 81 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering

T06KL 01 AAC 19,835 WEST 9/1/2002 100 0 0 No distress


T07KL 01 AC 9,326 WEST 9/3/1995 98 0 100 L&T Cracking

TAKL




Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-85

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




TAKL 03 AC 31,126 WEST 8/3/1983 73 0 100 L&T Cracking

TBKL 02 AC 8,318 WEST 8/3/1983 82 0 100 L&T Cracking

TCKL 01 AC 6,573 WEST 8/3/1983 72 0 100 L&T Cracking

Strom Field Airport

A01MO 01 AAC 10,434 WEST 8/1/1987 24 46 40 Alligator Cracking, Bleeding, Depression, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Rutting

A02MO 01 AAC 9,509 WEST 8/1/1987 14 42 19 Alligator Cracking, Bleeding, Depression, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Rutting

A03MO 01 PCC 238 WEST 9/1/1987 43 100 0 Shattered Slab

R07MO 01 AAC 72,000 WEST 8/1/1987 42 50 44 Alligator Cracking, Bleeding, Depression, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Rutting

T01MO 01 AAC 7,238 WEST 8/1/1987 10 49 22 Alligator Cracking, Bleeding, Depression, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Rutting

Sunnyside Municipal Airport

A01SU

01 AAC 129,091 SCNT 9/1/1998 56 39 61 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Rutting, Weathering




R07SU 01 AAC 189,480 SCNT 9/1/2003 68 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering


T01SU 01 AC 45,527 SCNT 6/3/2009 100 0 0 No distress

T02SU 01 AAC 19,840 SCNT 9/1/1998 50 52 48 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering

T03SU 01 AC 42,097 SCNT 9/2/1985 70 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-86

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI



Sunnyside Municipal Airport

T03SU 02 AC 5,258 SCNT 9/2/1975 61 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

Swanson Field Airport

A01EA 01 AC 4,710 WEST 9/3/1997 80 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

A02EA 01 AC 4,895 WEST 9/3/1997 83 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling

R16EA 01 AC 107,640 WEST 9/3/1997 97 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

Tacoma Narrows Airport

A01TN





05 AC 77,120 WEST 9/2/1983 72 16 79 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Oil Spillage, Weathering




09 AC 32,263 WEST 9/1/1975 70 16 84 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

11 AC 26,455 WEST 9/1/1965 71 21 74 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Oil Spillage, Raveling, Weathering





Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-87

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




A01TN

15 AC 111,630 WEST 9/2/1985 76 36 64 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Rutting, Weathering



19 AC 18,398 WEST 9/1/1985 63 33 52 Depression, L&T Cracking, Rutting, Weathering


AH17TN 01 AC 28,438 WEST 9/2/1992 95 0 100 L&T Cracking

AH35TN 01 AC 28,956 WEST 9/2/1970 74 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

R17TN

01A AC 212,500 WEST 9/3/1964 72 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering


02A AC 287,500 WEST 9/3/1964 70 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering


TA1TN 01 AC 21,825 WEST 9/3/1964 71 32 68 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Weathering

TA2TN 01 AC 23,971 WEST 9/3/1964 72 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

TA3TN




TA4TN 01 AC 37,082 WEST 9/2/1970 72 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

TATN 01 AC 186,742 WEST 9/2/1970 74 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching, Weathering


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-88

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




TATN 02 AC 190,463 WEST 9/3/1964 75 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

Tonasket Municipal Airport

A01TK 01 AC 47,203 NCNT 9/2/1993 30 57 33

Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking

02 AC 38,786 NCNT 9/1/2002 60 0 58 Depression, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Swelling, Weathering

A02TK 01 PCC 1,500 NCNT 9/2/1998 57 100 0 LTD Cracking, Shattered Slab

R15TK 01 AC 152,122 NCNT 9/2/1990 51 85 15 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Rutting

Tonasket Municipal Airport

T01TK 01 AAC 98,622 NCNT 10/1/2005 83 58 41 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Weathering

T02TK 01 AC 21,957 NCNT 9/2/1993 20 83 14 Patching, Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Rutting

T06TK 01 AC 10,036 NCNT 9/2/1993 22 60 23 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling, Rutting, Weathering

Twisp Municipal Airport

A01TW 01 AAC 7,086 NCNT 9/1/1995 40 42 58 Alligator Cracking, Block Cracking, L&T Cracking, Weathering

A02TW

01 AC 21,347 NCNT 9/2/1992 57 39 61 Alligator Cracking, Block Cracking, L&T Cracking, Weathering

02 AC 6,205 NCNT 9/2/1995 42 44 40 Alligator Cracking, Block Cracking, Depression, Weathering

A03TW 01 AC 7,600 NCNT 9/1/2002 67 55 45


02 AC 11,480 NCNT 9/2/2004 93 0 100 Patching


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-89

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI



Twisp Municipal Airport

R10TW 01 AAC 168,762 NCNT 6/1/2010 100 0 0 No distress

T01TW 01 AC 41,135 NCNT 9/2/1995 13 89 11 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Rutting, Weathering

T02TW 01 AC 2,719 NCNT 9/2/1992 13 84 13 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Weathering

T03TW 01 AC 6,030 NCNT 9/2/2003 70 0 94 Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching

Vista Field Airport

A01KW

01 AAC 82,165 SCNT 9/1/1999 67 0 94 L&T Cracking, Oil Spillage, Raveling, Weathering

02 AAC 37,075 SCNT 6/1/1999 90 44 45 L&T Cracking, Oil Spillage, Rutting, Weathering

03 AC 43,185 SCNT 9/2/1994 74 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

AHLD20KW 01 AC 9,160 SCNT 9/2/1994 75 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

AHLD2KW 01 AC 4,200 SCNT 9/2/2002 97 0 100 L&T Cracking

R02KW 01 AAC 348,200 SCNT 9/2/1999 76 0 100 L&T Cracking


T01KW




T02KW 01 AC 4,223 SCNT 9/2/1994 83 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

TA1KW




Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-90

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI



Vista Field Airport TAKW 01 AAC 124,714 SCNT 9/1/2002 65 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

Walla Walla Regional Airport

AGAWW

01 PCC 390,169 SCNT 9/2/1943 65 43 31

Corner Break, Corner Spalling, Joint Seal Damage, Joint Spalling, Large Patch/Utility, LTD Cracking, Scaling, Shattered Slab, Shrinkage Cracking, Small Patch

02 APC 235,885 SCNT 9/1/1993 30 22 75

Alligator Cracking, Bleeding, Block Cracking, Joint Reflection Cracking, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Swelling, Weathering

03 APC 342,193 SCNT 9/1/1993 55 0 98 Joint Reflection Cracking, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Swelling, Weathering

04 APC 557,776 SCNT 11/1/2012 100 0 0 No distress

05 PCC 314,843 SCNT 9/2/1943 69 33 29

Corner Break, Joint Seal Damage, Joint Spalling, Large Patch/Utility, LTD Cracking, Scaling, Shattered Slab, Small Patch

06 PCC 5,184 SCNT 11/3/2012 100 0 0 No distress

ATERMWW 01 PCC 118,898 SCNT 9/3/2000 96 15 38 Corner Break, Corner Spalling, Joint Seal Damage, Joint Spalling, Small Patch

R02WW





Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-91

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




R07WW

01 PCC 244,547 SCNT 9/2/1943 10 16 10 Joint Seal Damage, Joint Spalling, LTD Cracking, Scaling, Shrinkage Cracking

02 PCC 244,547 SCNT 9/2/1943 11 15 10

Joint Seal Damage, Joint Spalling, Large Patch/Utility, LTD Cracking, Scaling, Small Patch

03 PCC 244,547 SCNT 9/2/1943 9 9 9

Joint Seal Damage, Joint Spalling, Large Patch/Utility, LTD Cracking, Scaling, Shrinkage Cracking, Small Patch


05 AC 17,389 SCNT 9/2/2003 99 0 100 Weathering

06 AC 17,389 SCNT 9/2/2003 99 0 100 Weathering

R16WW

01 PCC 323,039 SCNT 9/2/1943 14 7 11 Joint Seal Damage, Joint Spalling, LTD Cracking, Scaling

02 PCC 323,039 SCNT 9/2/1943 15 8 11 Corner Spalling, Joint Seal Damage, Joint Spalling, LTD Cracking, Scaling

03 PCC 323,039 SCNT 9/2/1943 14 16 48

Blow-up, Corner Spalling, Joint Seal Damage, Joint Spalling, Large Patch/Utility, LTD Cracking, Scaling, Shattered Slab

TAWW 01 PCC 3,500 SCNT 9/2/1943 4 33 9

Corner Break, Joint Seal Damage, LTD Cracking, Scaling

02 APC 10,127 SCNT 9/1/2002 98 0 100 L&T Cracking


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-92

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




TAWW

03 APC 15,841 SCNT 9/1/2003 97 0 100 L&T Cracking

04 APC 392,490 SCNT 9/1/1982 56 29 71 Alligator Cracking, Joint Reflection Cracking, L&T Cracking, Weathering

05 APC 92,598 SCNT 9/1/1996 73 0 100 Joint Reflection Cracking, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

06 APC 42,543 SCNT 9/1/1995 68 0 100 Joint Reflection Cracking, L&T Cracking, Raveling

07 PCC 12,501 SCNT 9/2/1943 10 50 7

Corner Break, Corner Spalling, Joint Seal Damage, Large Patch/Utility, LTD Cracking, Scaling, Shattered Slab, Shrinkage Cracking

TBWW 01 APC 12,149 SCNT 9/1/1996 88 0 100


02 APC 14,435 SCNT 6/1/1982 70 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

TCWW

01 APC 165,970 SCNT 9/1/1982 43 0 79 Joint Reflection Cracking, L&T Cracking, Swelling, Weathering

02 APC 10,841 SCNT 9/1/1996 98 0 100 Weathering



05 APC 15,292 SCNT 9/1/1982 67 0 100 Joint Reflection Cracking, L&T Cracking, Weathering

TDWW 01 APC 12,432 SCNT 9/1/2003 92 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

02 APC 16,270 SCNT 9/1/1982 66 57 43 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Weathering

TEWW 01 APC 19,115 SCNT 9/1/2003 98 0 100 L&T Cracking


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-93

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




TEWW 02 APC 32,413 SCNT 9/1/1982 54 35 65 Alligator Cracking, Joint Reflection Cracking, L&T Cracking, Weathering

TGWW 01 PCC 70,820 SCNT 6/2/1943 7 27 40

Blow-up, Corner Break, Corner Spalling, Joint Seal Damage, Joint Spalling, Large Patch/Utility, LTD Cracking, Scaling, Shattered Slab, Shrinkage Cracking

Warden Airport

A01WA 01 AC 26,936 SCNT 9/2/2002 86 0 28 Depression, L&T Cracking

R17WA 01 AC 112,000 SCNT 9/2/1977 50 38 62



Waterville Airport

A01WV 01 AC 9,522 NCNT 9/2/1976 1 49 26 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Raveling

A02WV

01 AC 34,937 NCNT 9/2/1997 81 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling

02 AC 13,397 NCNT 9/3/1998 63 14 84 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling, Swelling, Weathering

A03WV 01 AC 4,257 NCNT 9/3/1998 70 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling, Weathering

R07WV 01 AAC 149,750 NCNT 9/2/1997 69 40 45 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Swelling, Weathering

T01WV 01 AC 18,033 NCNT 6/1/2009 96 0 97 Depression, L&T Cracking, Raveling

T02WV 01 AC 18,775 NCNT 9/3/1997 64 58 34 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling, Swelling


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-94

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI



Waterville Airport T03WV 01 AC 6,141 NCNT 9/3/1998 65 30 70 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling, Weathering

Westport Airport

A01WE 01 AC 80,000 CSTL 9/1/1993 71 0 25 Raveling, Swelling, Weathering

A02WE 01 AC 4,886 CSTL 9/1/1993 66 0 40 Depression, Raveling, Swelling, Weathering

R12WE 01 AC 112,500 CSTL 9/1/1993 61 0 64 Raveling, Swelling, Weathering

T01WE 01 AC 24,359 CSTL 9/1/1993 69 32 48 Alligator Cracking, Raveling, Swelling, Weathering

Whidbey Airpark R16LA 01 AAC 71,711 WEST 7/1/2002 97 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling

Wilbur Municipal Airport

A01WL 01 AC 21,250 NCNT 9/1/2003 69 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling

A02WL 01 AC 6,614 NCNT 1/1/1985 23 40 54 Alligator Cracking, Block Cracking, L&T Cracking, Raveling, Rutting, Swelling

A03WL


02 PCC 8,140 NCNT 6/1/1985 58 80 0 LTD Cracking, Shattered Slab, Shrinkage Cracking, Small Patch

R02WL 01 AAC 110,425 NCNT 6/1/2009 97 0 100 L&T Cracking


T01WL

01 AC 38,680 NCNT 6/2/2010 98 0 100 Patching


03 AAC 3,573 NCNT 6/1/2009 100 0 0 No distress

T02WL 01 AC 26,378 NCNT 6/3/2009 100 0 0 No distress

Willapa Harbor Airport

A01WP 01 AAC 40,260 CSTL 10/1/2007 100 0 0 No distress

R11WP 01 AAC 156,000 CSTL 10/1/2005 100 0 0 No distress


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-95

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI



Willapa Harbor Airport

T01WP 01 AC 89,178 CSTL 10/3/2007 100 0 0 No distress

Willard Field Airport

A01TE 01 AAC 18,236 EAST 10/1/1996 55 69 31 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking

HP01TE 01 AC 1,600 EAST 9/2/2001 69 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling

R04TE 01 AAC 58,980 EAST 9/1/2001 80 0 100 L&T Cracking, Patching

02 AC 32,860 EAST 9/2/2001 49 31 69 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Raveling

T01TE 01 AAC 4,500 EAST 10/1/1996 74 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling

William R. Fairchild International Airport

A01PO


02 AC 96,042 WEST 9/2/1978 93 48 52 Alligator Cracking, Block Cracking

03 PCC 2,000 WEST 9/2/1999 71 8 90 Joint Seal Damage, LTD Cracking, Shrinkage Cracking




A02PO 02 AC 32,771 WEST 9/2/1942 37 41 59

Alligator Cracking, Block Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching

03 PCC 22,500 WEST 9/2/1942 95 0 100 Joint Seal Damage

A03PO



03 AC 87,123 WEST 9/2/1978 75 0 100 L&T Cracking, Raveling


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-96

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




A04PO 01 AC 108,045 WEST 9/2/1965 55 55 45 Alligator Cracking, Block Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Rutting

AHLD08PO 01 AAC 11,249 WEST 9/1/1980 82 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

R08PO

01A AAC 328,000 WEST 9/1/1989 71 0 98 Block Cracking, L&T Cracking, Swelling, Weathering

01B AAC 164,000 WEST 9/1/1989 80 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

02A AAC 307,000 WEST 9/1/1996 85 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

02B AAC 153,500 WEST 9/1/1996 84 0 95 L&T Cracking, Swelling, Weathering

R13PO 01 AAC 170,463 WEST 9/1/1978 65 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering

T01PO 01 AC 3,897 WEST 6/2/2007 100 0 0 No distress

T02PO 01 AC 4,449 WEST 9/2/1978 64 0 100 Block Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching

T03PO 01 AC 4,941 WEST 9/3/1987 34 63 37 Alligator Cracking, Block Cracking, L&T Cracking

T04PO 01 AC 5,668 WEST 9/2/1970 45 43 57 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching

T05PO 01 AC 17,496 WEST 9/3/1942 80 31 69 Alligator Cracking, L&T Cracking

T06PO 01 AC 25,192 WEST 9/3/1942 35 49 32 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking

TAPO






Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-97

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI




TAPO 05 AAC 47,705 WEST 6/1/2009 100 0 0 No distress

TBPO 01 AAC 2,343 WEST 6/1/2009 100 0 0 No distress


TCLPO 01 AC 34,696 WEST 9/3/1942 19 55 37

Alligator Cracking, Block Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling, Rutting

TCPO 02 AAC 5,687 WEST 6/1/2009 100 0 0 No distress

TDPO 01 AAC 5,988 WEST 6/1/2009 100 0 0 No distress


TEPO 01 AC 20,833 WEST 9/2/1942 31 48 44

Alligator Cracking, Block Cracking, L&T Cracking, Patching, Swelling


TFPO 01 AAC 13,573 WEST 9/1/1980 90 0 100 L&T Cracking

TGPO 01 AAC 13,573 WEST 6/1/2009 100 0 0 No distress

THPO 01 AAC 16,909 WEST 6/1/2009 100 0 0 No distress

TINDPO 01 AC 37,355 WEST 9/3/1985 68 0 100 Block Cracking, L&T Cracking, Weathering

TJPO 01 AC 159,969 WEST 9/2/1942 34 53 38 Alligator Cracking, Depression, L&T Cracking, Patching, Raveling, Rutting

TKPO 01 AC 4,513 WEST 9/2/1972 38 0 98 L&T Cracking, Raveling, Swelling, Weathering

Wilson Creek Airport

A01WC 01 AC 85,995 EAST 9/1/2003 49 69 22 L&T Cracking, Rutting, Swelling

R10WC 01 AC 137,500 EAST 9/1/1997 59 57 43 L&T Cracking, Rutting


Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

D-98

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013


Type Section

Area (sf) Zone LCD

2012 PCI



Woodland State Airport

R32WO 01 AAC 11,235 WEST 9/1/2003 79 0 100 L&T Cracking, Weathering


APPENDIX E

PAVEMENT PERFORMANCE MODELS, UNIT COST, AND WORK POLICY INFORMATION


Table E-1. Detailed information on pavement performance models.

Applied Pavement Technology, Inc. E-1

Model Name1 Description of Model Family1 Mathematical Equation2

AAC-CW-APRON-GA AAC Aprons; GA Coastal and Western Zones Critical PCI = 60

PCI = 100-0.5296X-0.03124X2

AAC-CW-APRON-RELIEVER/COMM/ PRIMARY

AAC Aprons; Reliever, Commercial, and Primary Coastal and Western Zones Critical PCI = 60

PCI = 100-0.50777X-0.01575X2

AAC-CW-RW<60

AAC Runways Load <60,000 lbs Coastal and Western Zones Critical PCI = 65

PCI = 100-0.69945X-0.03381X2

AAC-CW-RW>60

AAC Runways Load ≥ 60,000 lbs Coastal and Western Zones Critical PCI = 70

PCI = 100-0.17509X-0.05866X2+ 0.00101X3

AAC-CW-TW<60

AAC Taxiways Load <60,000 lbs Coastal and Western Zones Critical PCI = 60

PCI = 100-0.44193X-0.02829X2+ 0.00033X3

AAC-CW-TW>60

AAC Taxiways Load ≥ 60,000 lbs Coastal and Western Zones Critical PCI = 65

PCI = 100-0.44193X-0.02829X2+ 0.00033X3

AAC-ENS-APRON-ALL

AAC Aprons East, North, and South Zones Critical PCI = 60

PCI = 100-1.57767X

AAC-ENS-RW<60

AAC Runways Load <60,000 lbs East, North, and South Zones Critical PCI = 65

PCI = 100-1.77067X+0.01535X2

AAC-ENS-RW>60

AAC Runways Load ≥ 60,000 lbs East, North, and South Zones Critical PCI = 70

PCI = 100-0.09711X-0.18053X2+0.00671X3-0.00008X4


Table E-1. Detailed information on pavement performance models (continued).



AAC-ENS-TW-GA/RELIEVER<60

AAC Taxiways; GA and Reliever Load <60,000 lbs East, North, and South Zones Critical PCI = 60

PCI = 100-1.94008X

AAC-ENS-TW-GA/RELIEVER>60

AAC Taxiways; GA and Reliever Load ≥ 60,000 lbs East, North, and South Zones Critical PCI = 65

PCI = 100-1.94008X

AAC-ENS-TW-COMM/PRIMARY>60

AAC Taxiways; Commercial/Primary Load ≥ 60,000 lbs East, North, and South Zones Critical PCI = 65

PCI = 100-0.16187X-0.07503X2

AC-CW-APRON-GA AC Aprons; GA Coastal and Western Zones Critical PCI = 60

PCI = 100-1.20902X

AC-CW-APRON-RELIEVER

AC Aprons; Reliever Coastal and Western Zones Critical PCI = 60

PCI = 100-1.47255X

AC-CW-APRON-COMM/PRIMARY

AC Aprons; Commercial/Primary Coastal and Western Zones Critical PCI = 60

PCI = 100-1.09126X

AC-CW-RW<60

AC Runways Load <60,000 lbs Coastal and Western Zones Critical PCI = 65

PCI = 100-0.07805X2+ 0.00083X3

AC-CW-RW>60

AC Runways Load ≥ 60,000 lbs Coastal and Western Zones Critical PCI = 70

PCI = 100-1.1712X+0.00741X2

AC-CW-TW-GA<60

AC Taxiways; GA Load <60,000 lbs Coastal and Western Zones Critical PCI = 60

PCI = 100-1.08643X+0.00403X2





AC-CW-TW-GA>60

AC Taxiways; GA Load ≥ 60,000 lbs Coastal and Western Zones Critical PCI = 65

PCI = 100-1.08643X+0.00403X2

AC-CW-TW-RELIEVER<60

AC Taxiways; Reliever Load <60,000 lbs Coastal and Western Zones Critical PCI = 60

PCI = 100-0.91873X-0.02084X2+ 0.00033X3

AC-CW-TW-RELIEVER>60

AC Taxiways; Reliever Load ≥ 60,000 lbs Coastal and Western Zones Critical PCI = 65

PCI = 100-0.91873X-0.02084X2+ 0.00033X3

AC-CW-TW-COMM/PRIMARY<60

AC Taxiways; Commercial/Primary Load <60,000 lbs Coastal and Western Zones Critical PCI = 60

PCI = 100-1.32579X

AC-CW-TW-COMM/PRIMARY>60

AC Taxiways; Commercial/Primary Load ≥ 60,000 lbs Coastal and Western Zones Critical PCI = 65

PCI = 100-1.32579X

AC-ENS-APRON-GA/RELIEVER

AC Aprons; GA and Reliever East, North, and South Zones Critical PCI = 60

PCI = 100-1.73609X-0.01665X2+ 0.0003X3

AC-ENS-APRON- COMM/PRIMARY

AC Aprons; Commercial/PrimaryEast, North, and South Zones Critical PCI = 60

PCI = 100-1.49788X+0.02254X2-0.0019X3

AC-ENS-RW>60

AC Runways Load ≥ 60,000 lbs East, North, and South Zones Critical PCI = 70

PCI = 100-0.50455X-0.03737X2

AC-ENS-RW<60

AC Runways Load <60,000 lbs East, North, and South Zones Critical PCI = 65

PCI = 100-1.48168X





AC-ENS-TW-GA/RELIEVER<60

AC Taxiways; GA and Reliever Load <60,000 lbs East, North, and South Zones Critical PCI = 60

PCI = 100-1.33213X+0.00029X2-0.00019X3

AC-ENS-TW-GA/RELIEVER>60

AC Taxiways; GA and Reliever Load ≥ 60,000 lbs East, North, and South Zones Critical PCI = 65

PCI = 100-1.33213X+0.00029X2-0.00019X3

AC-ENS-TW-COMM/PRIMARY>60

AC Taxiways; Commercial/Primary Load ≥ 60,000 lbs East, North, and South Zones Critical PCI = 65

PCI = 100-1.75787X

AC/AAC-THANG-CW AC/AAC T-Hangars Coastal and Western Zones Critical PCI = 60

PCI = 100-1.02854X

AC/AAC-THANG-ENS AC/AAC T-Hangars East, North, and South Zones Critical PCI = 60

PCI = 100-1.04037X

APC-ALL-APRON APC Aprons All Zones Critical PCI = 60

PCI = 100-1.54694X+0.0056X2

APC-ALL-RW>60

APC Runways Load ≥ 60,000 lbs All Zones Critical PCI = 70

PCI = 100-1.54694X+0.0056X2

APC-ALL-TW<60

APC Taxiways Load <60,000 lbs All Zones Critical PCI = 60

PCI = 100-1.54694X+0.0056X2

APC-ALL-TW >60

APC Taxiways Load ≥ 60,000 lbs All Zones Critical PCI = 65

PCI = 100-1.54694X+0.0056X2

PCC-APRON-GA/RELIEVER

PCC Aprons; GA and Reliever All Zones Critical PCI = 50

PCI = 100-1.47697X





PCC-APRON- COMM/PRIMARY

PCC Aprons; Commercial/Primary All Zones Critical PCI = 50

PCI = 100-0.63693X

PCC-RW>60

PCC Runways Load ≥ 60,000 lbs All Zones Critical PCI = 70

PCI = 100-0.63605X

PCC-RW<60

PCC Runways Load <60,000 lbs All Zones Critical PCI = 65

PCI = 100-0.63605X

PCC-TW<60

PCC Taxiways Load <60,000 lbs All Zones Critical PCI = 60

PCI = 100-0.67149X+0.00186X2

PCC-TW >60

PCC Taxiways Load ≥ 60,000 lbs All Zones Critical PCI = 65

PCI = 100-0.67149X+0.00186X2

1AC = asphalt cement concrete; AAC = asphalt overlay on AC; PCC = portland cement concrete; APC = asphalt overlay on PCC. 2x = pavement age in years.



Table E-2. Localized preventive maintenance policy, asphalt-surfaced pavements.

Distress Type Severity

Level Maintenance Action

Alligator Cracking Low Monitor

Medium Full Depth AC Patch High Full Depth AC Patch

Bleeding N/A Monitor

Block Cracking Low Monitor

Medium Crack Seal High Crack Seal

Corrugation Low Monitor

Medium Monitor High Full Depth AC Patch

Depression Low Monitor


Jet Blast N/A Partial Depth AC Patch

Joint Reflection Cracking

Low Monitor Medium Crack Seal

High Crack Seal

Longitudinal and Transverse Cracking

Low Monitor Medium Crack Seal

High Crack Seal Oil Spillage N/A Partial Depth AC Patch

Patching Low Monitor


Polished Aggregate N/A Monitor

Raveling Low Monitor

Medium Partial Depth AC Patch High Partial Depth AC Patch

Rutting Low Monitor


Shoving Low Monitor

Medium Full Depth AC Patch High Full Depth AC Patch

Slippage Cracking N/A Full Depth AC Patch

Swelling Low Monitor

Medium Monitor High Full Depth Patch

Weathering Low Monitor

Medium Monitor High Monitor



Table E-3. Localized preventive maintenance policy, PCC pavements.

Distress Type Severity

Level Maintenance Action

Alkali-Silica Reactivity (ASR)

Low Monitor Medium Slab Replacement

High Slab Replacement

Blow-Up Low Slab Replacement

Medium Slab Replacement High Slab Replacement

Corner Break Low Monitor

Medium Crack Seal High Full Depth PCC Patch

Linear Cracking Low Monitor

Medium Crack Seal High Slab Replacement

Durability Cracking

Low Monitor Medium Full Depth PCC Patch


Joint Seal Damage

Low Monitor Medium Joint Seal

High Joint Seal

Patching Low Monitor

Medium Monitor High Full Depth PCC Patch

Popouts N/A Monitor Pumping N/A Monitor

Scaling Low Monitor

Medium Slab Replacement High Slab Replacement

Settlement/ Faulting

Low Monitor Medium Monitor


Shattered Slab

Low Monitor Medium Slab Replacement

High Slab Replacement Shrinkage Cracking N/A Monitor

Spalling Low Monitor (Joint and Medium Partial Depth PCC Patch Corner) High Partial Depth PCC Patch

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

E-8

Table E-4. 2013 localized preventive maintenance unit costs.

Description Unit <12,500# 12,500 to 60,000# 60,000 to 100,000# >100,000#

West East West East West East West East

AC Pavements AC Patch-Deep SF $ 35.91 $ 31.96 $ 47.51 $ 42.70 $ 49.24 $ 44.44 $ 44.13 $ 40.18

Thickness INCH 2 2 5 5 5 5 5 5

AC Patch-Partial SF $ 30.02 $ 27.29 $ 30.02 $ 27.29 $ 30.02 $ 27.29 $ 30.02 $ 27.29 Thickness INCH 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

Crack Sealing LF $ 0.83 $ 0.79 $ 0.83 $ 0.79 $ 0.83 $ 0.79 $ 0.83 $ 0.79

PCC Pavements

Slab Replacement SF $ 18.57 $ 17.10 $ 29.56 $ 29.11 $ 34.23 $ 32.36 $ 40.74 $ 43.52 Thickness INCH 5 5 10 11 12 12.5 15 16

Full Depth Patch SF $ 48.06 $ 42.61 $ 78.45 $ 74.42 $ 84.61 $ 79.28 $125.88 $107.76

Thickness INCH 5 5 10 11 12 12.5 15 16

Partial Depth Patch SF $ 26.03 $ 23.62 $ 26.03 $ 23.62 $ 26.03 $ 23.62 $ 26.03 $ 23.62 Thickness INCH 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

Crack Seal LF $ 6.62 $ 5.92 $ 6.62 $ 5.92 $ 6.62 $ 5.92 $ 6.62 $ 5.92

Joint Seal (bituminous) LF $ 6.62 $ 5.92 $ 6.62 $ 5.92 $ 6.62 $ 5.92 $ 6.62 $ 5.92

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc.

E-9

Table E-5. 2013 unit costs for major rehabilitation activities.

Description1 Unit <12,500# 12,500 to 60,000# 60,000 to 100,000# >100,000#


AC Overlay SF $ 1.40 $ 1.37 $ 1.91 $ 1.88 $ 1.91 $ 1.88 $ 2.55 $ 2.50 Thickness INCH 2 2 3 3 3 3 4 4

PCC Reconstruction SF $ 16.93 $ 17.26 $ 31.57 $ 31.83 $ 35.36 $ 35.29 $ 45.42 $ 43.44

PCC Thickness INCH 5 5 10 11 12 12.5 15 16

Stab. Subbase Thickness INCH 8 8

Subbase Thickness INCH 4 9 8 10 8 12 14 14

AC Reconstruction SF $ 6.92 $ 9.37 $ 14.58 $ 16.58 $ 16.16 $ 21.36 $ 15.10 $ 18.50

AC Thickness INCH 2 2 5 5 5 5 5 5

Base Thickness INCH 3 3 6 6 6 6 17 26

Subbase Thickness INCH 4 10 10 16 13 20 N/A N/A

1PCI < 40 = Reconstruction; PCI > 40 = Asphalt Overlay

Table E-6. 2013 unit costs for global maintenance activities.

Description Unit <12,500# 12,500 to 60,000# 60,000 to 100,000# >100,000#


Fog Seal SF $ 0.18 $ 0.17 $ 0.18 $ 0.17 $ 0.18 $ 0.17 $ 0.18 $ 0.17 Slurry Seal SF $ 1.14 $ 1.01 $ 1.14 $ 1.01 $ 1.14 $ 1.01 $ 1.14 $ 1.01

APPENDIX F

2013 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE DETAILS

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. F

-1

Table F-1. 2013 preventive maintenance plan details.

Associated City

Airport Name Branch Section Distress Type SeverityMaintenance Recommendation Unit

Cost Estimated

Cost Action Quantity Unit

Anacortes Anacortes A01AN

01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 2,221 Ft $0.83 $1,84302 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 1,490 Ft $0.83 $1,23604 Joint Seal Damage Medium Joint Seal (Localized) 310 Ft $6.62 $2,052

TAAN 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 465 Ft $0.83 $386TH01AN 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 189 Ft $0.83 $157


ABAYAR 03 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 114 Ft $0.83 $94

AR1AR 01 Joint Reflection Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 659 Ft $0.83 $54702 Joint Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 70 SqFt $26.03 $1,810

THGRAR 02

Alligator Cracking Medium Patching - AC Deep 120 SqFt $44.13 $5,296L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 192 Ft $0.83 $159

10 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 104 Ft $0.83 $87TR2AR 01 Alligator Cracking Medium Patching - AC Deep 35 SqFt $44.13 $1,526


A01AU 01

Alligator Cracking Medium Patching - AC Deep 82 SqFt $35.91 $2,946L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 2,278 Ft $0.83 $1,891

Raveling Medium Patching - AC Shallow 931 SqFt $30.02 $27,953Raveling High Patching - AC Shallow 31 SqFt $30.02 $932

A03AU

02 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 1,466 Ft $0.83 $1,217

Raveling Medium Patching - AC Shallow 27 SqFt $30.02 $823Raveling High Patching - AC Shallow 59 SqFt $30.02 $1,782

03

L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 676 Ft $0.83 $561Oil/Fuel Damage N/A Patching - AC Shallow 29 SqFt $30.02 $875

Raveling Medium Patching - AC Shallow 1,078 SqFt $30.02 $32,365Raveling High Patching - AC Shallow 29 SqFt $30.02 $863

A04AU 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 72 Ft $0.83 $60

Raveling Medium Patching - AC Shallow 500 SqFt $30.02 $15,012R16AU 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 225 Ft $0.83 $187

Table F-1. 2013 preventive maintenance plan details (continued).

Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. F

-2

Associated City


Cost Estimated



R16AU 01 Raveling Medium Patching - AC Shallow 7 SqFt $30.02 $20002 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 553 Ft $0.83 $459

T08AU 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 83 Ft $0.83 $69

Raveling Medium Patching - AC Shallow 17 SqFt $30.02 $496Raveling High Patching - AC Shallow 33 SqFt $30.02 $992


A01BL 01 Oil/Fuel Damage N/A Patching - AC Shallow 224 SqFt $30.02 $6,714

AGABL 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 423 Ft $0.83 $35103 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 77 Ft $0.83 $6404 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 2,229 Ft $0.83 $1,850

TDBL 02 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 172 Ft $0.83 $143TFBL 05 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 343 Ft $0.83 $285

THANGBL

01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 328 Ft $0.83 $27303 Alligator Cracking Medium Patching - AC Deep 157 SqFt $44.13 $6,945

04 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 45 Ft $0.83 $38

Raveling Medium Patching - AC Shallow 524 SqFt $30.02 $15,719


A02BR

01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 306 Ft $0.83 $25402 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 263 Ft $0.83 $218

03 Alligator Cracking Medium Patching - AC Deep 88 SqFt $44.13 $3,880

L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 1,125 Ft $0.83 $934

A03BR



Raveling High Patching - AC Shallow 313 SqFt $30.02 $9,409


L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 1,066 Ft $0.83 $885L & T Cracking High Crack Sealing - AC 90 Ft $0.83 $74



Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. F

-3

Associated City


Cost Estimated



A03BR 05 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 4,108 Ft $0.83 $3,410

Oil/Fuel Damage N/A Patching - AC Shallow 166 SqFt $30.02 $4,981A05BR 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 284 Ft $0.83 $236

AFUELBR 01 Alligator Cracking Medium Patching - AC Deep 306 SqFt $44.13 $13,519

L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 285 Ft $0.83 $237AH2BR 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 106 Ft $0.83 $88

T01BR



Raveling High Patching - AC Shallow 14 SqFt $30.02 $428



TABR

01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 120 Ft $0.83 $10002 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 1,005 Ft $0.83 $834


L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 185 Ft $0.83 $15305 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 152 Ft $0.83 $126

TBBR 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 141 Ft $0.83 $117

TFBR 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 98 Ft $0.83 $8102 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 150 Ft $0.83 $125

TJBR 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 25 Ft $0.83 $21


AESK 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 73 Ft $0.83 $60T04SK 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 50 Ft $0.83 $42T05SK 01 Oil/Fuel Damage N/A Patching - AC Shallow 14 SqFt $30.02 $434T06SK 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 271 Ft $0.83 $225

Camas Grove Field R07CA 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 794 Ft $0.83 $659



Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. F

-4

Associated City


Cost Estimated


Camas Grove Field

T01CA 03 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 48 Ft $0.83 $40


T03CA 01

Alligator Cracking Medium Patching - AC Deep 363 SqFt $35.91 $13,019Raveling High Patching - AC Shallow 6 SqFt $30.02 $180

03 Raveling Medium Patching - AC Shallow 40 SqFt $30.02 $1,201

Cashmere Cashmere-Dryden

R07CD 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 845 Ft $0.79 $667


T01CD 01 Raveling Medium Patching - AC Shallow 6 SqFt $27.29 $156Raveling High Patching - AC Shallow 3 SqFt $27.29 $78


ABCS 01 Corner Break Medium Crack Sealing - PCC 8 Ft $6.62 $54

Joint Seal Damage High Joint Seal (Localized) 353 Ft $6.62 $2,336

APRNCS



02


Oil/Fuel Damage N/A Patching - AC Shallow 97 SqFt $30.02 $2,903Raveling Medium Patching - AC Shallow 191 SqFt $30.02 $5,742Raveling High Patching - AC Shallow 54 SqFt $30.02 $1,608

03 Raveling Medium Patching - AC Shallow 3 SqFt $30.02 $103Raveling High Patching - AC Shallow 2 SqFt $30.02 $69

R16CS 01A

Corner Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 28 SqFt $26.03 $719Joint Seal Damage Medium Joint Seal (Localized) 19,972 Ft $6.62 $132,217Joint Seal Damage High Joint Seal (Localized) 9,986 Ft $6.62 $66,108

Joint Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 66 SqFt $26.03 $1,724Joint Spalling High Patching - PCC Partial Depth 83 SqFt $26.03 $2,156LTD Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - PCC 135 Ft $6.62 $895


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. F

-5

Associated City


Cost Estimated



R16CS 01B Joint Seal Damage Medium Joint Seal (Localized) 5,269 Ft $6.62 $34,884Joint Seal Damage High Joint Seal (Localized) 2,635 Ft $6.62 $17,442

Joint Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 36 SqFt $26.03 $934T05CS 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 27 Ft $0.83 $23T06CS 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 54 Ft $0.83 $45TA3CS 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 73 Ft $0.83 $60

TA4CS 01

Corner Break Medium Crack Sealing - PCC 15 Ft $6.62 $101Corner Spalling High Patching - PCC Partial Depth 5 SqFt $26.03 $131

Joint Seal Damage High Joint Seal (Localized) 4,943 Ft $6.62 $32,719Joint Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 12 SqFt $26.03 $314Joint Spalling High Patching - PCC Partial Depth 30 SqFt $26.03 $785LTD Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - PCC 199 Ft $6.62 $1,315

TA5CS 01 Joint Seal Damage High Joint Seal (Localized) 675 Ft $6.62 $4,469

Joint Spalling High Patching - PCC Partial Depth 8 SqFt $26.03 $210

TACS 01 Corner Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 15 SqFt $26.03 $387Corner Spalling High Patching - PCC Partial Depth 15 SqFt $26.03 $387

Joint Seal Damage High Joint Seal (Localized) 30,400 Ft $6.62 $201,248

TCLCS 01

Joint Seal Damage High Joint Seal (Localized) 8,955 Ft $6.62 $59,282Joint Spalling High Patching - PCC Partial Depth 18 SqFt $26.03 $459LTD Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - PCC 55 Ft $6.62 $365Shattered Slab Medium Slab Replacement - PCC 368 SqFt $34.23 $12,612Shattered Slab High Slab Replacement - PCC 169 SqFt $34.23 $5,776

Chelan Lake Chelan A02CN 01

L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 164 Ft $0.79 $129L & T Cracking High Crack Sealing - AC 125 Ft $0.79 $99

A03CN 01 Depression High Patching - AC Deep 56 SqFt $31.96 $1,791

L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 348 Ft $0.79 $275


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. F

-6

Associated City


Cost Estimated


Chewelah Sand Canyon R17CH 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 8,065 Ft $0.79 $6,371


A01CP 02 Joint Seal Damage High Joint Seal (Localized) 374 Ft $5.92 $2,212

R05CP 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 1,695 Ft $0.79 $1,339



A01CO 02 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 112 Ft $0.79 $89

A03CO 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 135 Ft $0.79 $10702 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 133 Ft $0.79 $105

A04CO 01 Alligator Cracking Medium Patching - AC Deep 278 SqFt $31.96 $8,893

L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 4 Ft $0.79 $3R01CO 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 3,917 Ft $0.79 $3,095T01CO 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 40 Ft $0.79 $32T05CO 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 399 Ft $0.79 $315

Concrete Mears Field (Concrete) A02CC 01 Depression High Patching - AC Deep 12 SqFt $35.91 $420

Darrington Darrington Municipal T01DR 01 Alligator Cracking Medium Patching - AC Deep 282 SqFt $35.91 $10,127

Davenport Davenport Municipal

A01DA 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 1,654 Ft $0.79 $1,307A02DA 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 855 Ft $0.79 $675T01DA 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 416 Ft $0.79 $329T02DA 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 471 Ft $0.79 $372


R04DP 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 1,367 Ft $0.79 $1,080

Raveling Medium Patching - AC Shallow 1,114 SqFt $27.29 $30,403R16DP 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 54 Ft $0.79 $43

TA1DP 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 346 Ft $0.79 $273L & T Cracking High Crack Sealing - AC 100 Ft $0.79 $79

TA2DP 01 Alligator Cracking Medium Patching - AC Deep 76 SqFt $42.70 $3,253


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. F

-7

Associated City


Cost Estimated



TA2DP 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 352 Ft $0.79 $278

TA3DP 01 Alligator Cracking Medium Patching - AC Deep 18 SqFt $42.70 $784

L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 696 Ft $0.79 $550TA4DP 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 959 Ft $0.79 $757TBDP 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 266 Ft $0.79 $210


HP01OR 01 Joint Seal Damage High Joint Seal (Localized) 240 Ft $6.62 $1,589

R16OR 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 378 Ft $0.83 $314 02 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 794 Ft $0.83 $659

TA1OR 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 58 Ft $0.83 $48

Eatonville Swanson Field A01EA 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 131 Ft $0.83 $109A02EA 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 39 Ft $0.83 $32

Electric City

Grand Coulee Dam

A01EC 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 757 Ft $0.79 $598R03EC 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 3,332 Ft $0.79 $2,632T01EC 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 6 Ft $0.79 $5T02EC 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 334 Ft $0.79 $264T03EC 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 90 Ft $0.79 $71

Ellensburg Bowers Field A01EL


Raveling Medium Patching - AC Shallow 2 SqFt $27.29 $55

02

Corner Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 45 SqFt $23.62 $1,073Corner Spalling High Patching - PCC Partial Depth 136 SqFt $23.62 $3,220

Joint Seal Damage High Joint Seal (Localized) 55,715 Ft $5.92 $329,833Joint Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 436 SqFt $23.62 $10,305LTD Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - PCC 1,478 Ft $5.92 $8,747

Scaling Medium Slab Replacement - PCC 2,639 SqFt $32.36 $85,394Scaling High Slab Replacement - PCC 13,194 SqFt $32.36 $426,972



Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. F

-8

Associated City


Cost Estimated



A01EL


Raveling Medium Patching - AC Shallow 78 SqFt $27.29 $2,137Raveling High Patching - AC Shallow 2,576 SqFt $27.29 $70,295


Patching High Patching - AC Deep 63 SqFt $44.44 $2,796Raveling High Patching - AC Shallow 2 SqFt $27.29 $40

R11EL 01B Corner Spalling High Patching - PCC Partial Depth 58 SqFt $23.62 $1,367Joint Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 46 SqFt $23.62 $1,093LTD Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - PCC 90 Ft $5.92 $533

T02EL 01 Corner Spalling High Patching - PCC Partial Depth 11 SqFt $23.62 $254

Joint Seal Damage High Joint Seal (Localized) 1,000 Ft $5.92 $5,920Joint Spalling High Patching - PCC Partial Depth 24 SqFt $23.62 $572

T06EL 01 Corner Spalling High Patching - PCC Partial Depth 11 SqFt $23.62 $254Joint Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 52 SqFt $23.62 $1,220

TAEL

02 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 170 Ft $0.79 $13403 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 136 Ft $0.79 $108


L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 705 Ft $0.79 $55705 Raveling High Patching - AC Shallow 5 SqFt $27.29 $140

TFEL 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 141 Ft $0.79 $111


Elma Elma Municipal R25EM



L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 256 Ft $0.83 $213T01EM 01 Alligator Cracking Medium Patching - AC Deep 42 SqFt $35.91 $1,508


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. F

-9

Associated City


Cost Estimated


Elma Elma Municipal T01EM 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 150 Ft $0.83 $125


TB1EP 03 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 110 Ft $0.79 $87

TBEP 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 326 Ft $0.79 $25803 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 125 Ft $0.79 $99


AARMYPF

02 Corner Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 21 SqFt $26.03 $539

Joint Seal Damage High Joint Seal (Localized) 19,250 Ft $6.62 $127,434LTD Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - PCC 150 Ft $6.62 $994


Depression High Patching - AC Deep 149 SqFt $44.13 $6,572Raveling Medium Patching - AC Shallow 152 SqFt $30.02 $4,575

08

Joint Seal Damage High Joint Seal (Localized) 4,250 Ft $6.62 $28,135Joint Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 20 SqFt $26.03 $530Joint Spalling High Patching - PCC Partial Depth 13 SqFt $26.03 $331LTD Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - PCC 178 Ft $6.62 $1,175

ACENTPF 03 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 1,252 Ft $0.83 $1,03904 Oil/Fuel Damage N/A Patching - AC Shallow 127 SqFt $30.02 $3,817

ACHPF 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 446 Ft $0.83 $370

ACTPF 01 Alligator Cracking Medium Patching - AC Deep 948 SqFt $44.13 $41,815

L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 2,242 Ft $0.83 $1,861AEHPF 01 Depression High Patching - AC Deep 22 SqFt $44.13 $981

AERPF 01 Depression High Patching - AC Deep 153 SqFt $44.13 $6,763

L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 7,239 Ft $0.83 $6,008Oil/Fuel Damage N/A Patching - AC Shallow 557 SqFt $30.02 $16,713

AH16LPF 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 18 Ft $0.83 $15AITRPF 01 Oil/Fuel Damage N/A Patching - AC Shallow 155 SqFt $30.02 $4,663


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. F

-10

Associated City


Cost Estimated



AITRPF 01 Raveling Medium Patching - AC Shallow 55 SqFt $30.02 $1,640



AMESSPF 03

Corner Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 4 SqFt $26.03 $113Joint Seal Damage High Joint Seal (Localized) 3,139 Ft $6.62 $20,782

Joint Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 42 SqFt $26.03 $1,089Large Patching High Patching - PCC Full Depth 104 SqFt $125.88 $13,039LTD Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - PCC 64 Ft $6.62 $422

ANRPF 04 Alligator Cracking Medium Patching - AC Deep 42 SqFt $44.13 $1,85315 Alligator Cracking Medium Patching - AC Deep 76 SqFt $44.13 $3,354

AWRPF 01 Alligator Cracking Medium Patching - AC Deep 1,354 SqFt $44.13 $59,743

R16RPF 01B L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 9 Ft $0.83 $807A L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 30 Ft $0.83 $2507B L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 6 Ft $0.83 $5

TA9PF 03 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 259 Ft $0.83 $21504 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 98 Ft $0.83 $81

TAPF 13 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 38 Ft $0.83 $3221 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 1,404 Ft $0.83 $1,166

TCPF 01

L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 304 Ft $0.83 $253Raveling High Patching - AC Shallow 3 SqFt $30.02 $76


TD0PF 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 32 Ft $0.83 $2702 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 34 Ft $0.83 $2803 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 39 Ft $0.83 $32

TD1PF 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 105 Ft $0.83 $87TD2PF 03 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 93 Ft $0.83 $77


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. F

-11

Associated City


Cost Estimated



TD2PF 03 Raveling Medium Patching - AC Shallow 60 SqFt $30.02 $1,801TD3PF 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 9 Ft $0.83 $7TD4PF 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 30 Ft $0.83 $25

TDPF



Raveling Medium Patching - AC Shallow 2 SqFt $30.02 $6003 Raveling Medium Patching - AC Shallow 16 SqFt $30.02 $488


Raveling Medium Patching - AC Shallow 317 SqFt $30.02 $9,503TEPF 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 5,289 Ft $0.83 $4,390TFPF 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 389 Ft $0.83 $323

TG4PF 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 107 Ft $0.83 $89

TG6PF 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 28 Ft $0.83 $2302 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 105 Ft $0.83 $87

TGPF 01

Alligator Cracking Medium Patching - AC Deep 1,238 SqFt $44.13 $54,611L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 338 Ft $0.83 $280


L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 161 Ft $0.83 $134TINTPF 02 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 217 Ft $0.83 $180

Forks Forks Municipal A01FO 01

L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 305 Ft $0.83 $253Raveling High Patching - AC Shallow 86 SqFt $30.02 $2,590


AFUELFH 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 27 Ft $0.83 $22ARES1FH 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 18 Ft $0.83 $15ARES2FH 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 9 Ft $0.83 $8

ATRANSFH 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 294 Ft $0.83 $244TAFH 02 Alligator Cracking Medium Patching - AC Deep 31 SqFt $35.91 $1,097


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. F

-12

Associated City


Cost Estimated



TGFH 01 Alligator Cracking Medium Patching - AC Deep 42 SqFt $35.91 $1,508


THANG1FH 03 Joint Seal Damage High Joint Seal (Localized) 225 Ft $6.62 $1,490

Joint Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 13 SqFt $26.03 $336THANG3FH 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 434 Ft $0.83 $361

TIAFH 01 Alligator Cracking Medium Patching - AC Deep 45 SqFt $35.91 $1,612



R07GO 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 103 Ft $0.83 $86

T01GO 01 Alligator Cracking Medium Patching - AC Deep 87 SqFt $35.91 $3,114


T03GO 01 Alligator Cracking Medium Patching - AC Deep 216 SqFt $35.91 $7,751

L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 149 Ft $0.83 $123Raveling High Patching - AC Shallow 5 SqFt $30.02 $156


A01HO 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 28 Ft $0.83 $23A02HO 02 Raveling Medium Patching - AC Shallow 62 SqFt $30.02 $1,861

A03HO 01

Oil/Fuel Damage N/A Patching - AC Shallow 85 SqFt $30.02 $2,542Raveling High Patching - AC Shallow 29 SqFt $30.02 $874

03 Raveling High Patching - AC Shallow 240 SqFt $30.02 $7,20504 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 89 Ft $0.83 $74

R06HO

01A L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 40 Ft $0.83 $3302A L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 627 Ft $0.83 $52002B L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 251 Ft $0.83 $20803A L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 13 Ft $0.83 $1103B L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 10 Ft $0.83 $8

T01HO 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 574 Ft $0.83 $476


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. F

-13

Associated City


Cost Estimated



A01KL 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 1,344 Ft $0.83 $1,116

R12KL 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 855 Ft $0.83 $710


L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 239 Ft $0.83 $199T01KL 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 408 Ft $0.83 $339T02KL 02 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 244 Ft $0.83 $203T03KL 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 130 Ft $0.83 $108

TAKL



L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 562 Ft $0.83 $46703 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 990 Ft $0.83 $822

TBKL 02 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 135 Ft $0.83 $112TCKL 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 261 Ft $0.83 $217


A01KW 01


02 Oil/Fuel Damage N/A Patching - AC Shallow 38 SqFt $27.29 $1,04103 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 796 Ft $0.79 $628

AHLD20KW 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 226 Ft $0.79 $179

R02KW 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 6,906 Ft $0.79 $5,45602 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 2,031 Ft $0.79 $1,604

T01KW 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 1,963 Ft $0.79 $1,55103 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 799 Ft $0.79 $631

T02KW 01 Raveling Medium Patching - AC Shallow 2 SqFt $27.29 $55TA1KW 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 47 Ft $0.79 $37TAKW 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 6,391 Ft $0.79 $5,049

Kent Crest Airpark T01KE 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 147 Ft $0.83 $122


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. F

-14

Associated City


Cost Estimated


Langley Whidbey Airpark R16LA 01 Raveling Medium Patching - AC Shallow 300 SqFt $30.02 $9,006

Lind Lind Municipal A01LI 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 280 Ft $0.79 $221R05LI 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 2,240 Ft $0.79 $1,770T01LI 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 159 Ft $0.79 $126


A01LY 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 167 Ft $0.83 $139T02LY 01 Alligator Cracking Medium Patching - AC Deep 90 SqFt $35.91 $3,236T03LY 01 Patching High Patching - AC Deep 36 SqFt $35.91 $1,296

Mansfield Mansfield

A01MA 01 Alligator Cracking Medium Patching - AC Deep 351 SqFt $31.96 $11,229


A04MA 01 Alligator Cracking Medium Patching - AC Deep 56 SqFt $31.96 $1,791


R03MA 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 2,878 Ft $0.79 $2,274L & T Cracking High Crack Sealing - AC 41 Ft $0.79 $32

T01MA 01 Alligator Cracking Medium Patching - AC Deep 36 SqFt $31.96 $1,154


T02MA 01 Alligator Cracking Medium Patching - AC Deep 46 SqFt $31.96 $1,480


Mattawa Desert Aire

A01MT 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 1,869 Ft $0.79 $1,477

R10MT 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 6,164 Ft $0.79 $4,869


T01MT 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 95 Ft $0.79 $75

Raveling Medium Patching - AC Shallow 33 SqFt $27.29 $905Raveling High Patching - AC Shallow 5 SqFt $27.29 $129


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. F

-15

Associated City


Cost Estimated


Moses Lake


A01GC

01

Joint Reflection Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 6,914 Ft $0.79 $5,462

L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 7,061 Ft $0.79 $5,579Oil/Fuel Damage N/A Patching - AC Shallow 2,246 SqFt $27.29 $61,299

03 Corner Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 3 SqFt $23.62 $66

Joint Seal Damage High Joint Seal (Localized) 7,776 Ft $5.92 $46,033LTD Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - PCC 212 Ft $5.92 $1,253

06

ASR Medium Slab Replacement - PCC 2,609 SqFt $43.52 $113,530Joint Seal Damage Medium Joint Seal (Localized) 1,261 Ft $5.92 $7,464Joint Seal Damage High Joint Seal (Localized) 4,539 Ft $5.92 $26,872

Joint Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 9 SqFt $23.62 $212LTD Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - PCC 175 Ft $5.92 $1,036

Scaling Medium Slab Replacement - PCC 870 SqFt $43.52 $37,843Shattered Slab Medium Slab Replacement - PCC 870 SqFt $43.52 $37,843

08

ASR Medium Slab Replacement - PCC 1,380 SqFt $43.52 $60,074Joint Seal Damage Medium Joint Seal (Localized) 2,068 Ft $5.92 $12,240Joint Seal Damage High Joint Seal (Localized) 14,783 Ft $5.92 $87,513

LTD Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - PCC 220 Ft $5.92 $1,302Shattered Slab Medium Slab Replacement - PCC 2,761 SqFt $43.52 $120,147Small Patching High Patching - PCC Full Depth 12 SqFt $107.76 $1,281

09 Joint Seal Damage High Joint Seal (Localized) 26,650 Ft $5.92 $157,768

LTD Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - PCC 503 Ft $5.92 $2,975Shattered Slab Medium Slab Replacement - PCC 3,590 SqFt $43.52 $156,226

ACOLUMBGC 01 Corner Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 30 SqFt $23.62 $700Corner Spalling High Patching - PCC Partial Depth 10 SqFt $23.62 $233

Joint Seal Damage Medium Joint Seal (Localized) 12,720 Ft $5.92 $75,303


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. F

-16

Associated City


Cost Estimated


Moses Lake


ACOLUMBGC 01 Joint Seal Damage High Joint Seal (Localized) 4,240 Ft $5.92 $25,101

Joint Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 47 SqFt $23.62 $1,120Small Patching High Patching - PCC Full Depth 10 SqFt $107.76 $1,064

AEASTGC 01

Corner Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 249 SqFt $23.62 $5,876Joint Seal Damage Medium Joint Seal (Localized) 14,808 Ft $5.92 $87,662Joint Seal Damage High Joint Seal (Localized) 177,692 Ft $5.92 $1,051,940

Joint Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 149 SqFt $23.62 $3,526Joint Spalling High Patching - PCC Partial Depth 373 SqFt $23.62 $8,814LTD Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - PCC 375 Ft $5.92 $2,222

AFUELGC 01 Small Patching High Patching - PCC Full Depth 42 SqFt $107.76 $4,540AHELIPADGC 01 Joint Seal Damage High Joint Seal (Localized) 46 Ft $5.92 $272

R14LGC

01C Corner Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 5 SqFt $23.62 $109

Joint Seal Damage Medium Joint Seal (Localized) 5,131 Ft $5.92 $30,378Joint Seal Damage High Joint Seal (Localized) 3,849 Ft $5.92 $22,784

01W Joint Seal Damage Medium Joint Seal (Localized) 16,480 Ft $5.92 $97,56202C Joint Seal Damage Medium Joint Seal (Localized) 2,950 Ft $5.92 $17,464

02OWCorner Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 4 SqFt $23.62 $85

Joint Seal Damage High Joint Seal (Localized) 1,967 Ft $5.92 $11,64302W Joint Seal Damage Medium Joint Seal (Localized) 1,380 Ft $5.92 $8,17003W L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 2,116 Ft $0.79 $1,671

04C Joint Seal Damage Medium Joint Seal (Localized) 2,225 Ft $5.92 $13,172Joint Seal Damage High Joint Seal (Localized) 2,225 Ft $5.92 $13,172

04W Joint Seal Damage Medium Joint Seal (Localized) 13,186 Ft $5.92 $78,058Joint Seal Damage High Joint Seal (Localized) 3,165 Ft $5.92 $18,734

R22GC 01 Joint Seal Damage Medium Joint Seal (Localized) 530 Ft $5.92 $3,140

Joint Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 7 SqFt $23.62 $153


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. F

-17

Associated City


Cost Estimated


Moses Lake


R22GC

01 Joint Spalling High Patching - PCC Partial Depth 8 SqFt $23.62 $19103C L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 327 Ft $0.79 $25803W L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 333 Ft $0.79 $26304W L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 120 Ft $0.79 $95

R927GC 01

Corner Spalling High Patching - PCC Partial Depth 26 SqFt $23.62 $609Joint Seal Damage Medium Joint Seal (Localized) 6,693 Ft $5.92 $39,623Joint Seal Damage High Joint Seal (Localized) 10,040 Ft $5.92 $59,434

Joint Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 62 SqFt $23.62 $1,462LTD Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - PCC 78 Ft $5.92 $462

Scaling Medium Slab Replacement - PCC 1,198 SqFt $43.52 $52,123Small Patching High Patching - PCC Full Depth 39 SqFt $107.76 $4,168

TA3GC 01 Joint Seal Damage High Joint Seal (Localized) 925 Ft $5.92 $5,476

LTD Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - PCC 25 Ft $5.92 $148

TAGC

01 Joint Seal Damage Medium Joint Seal (Localized) 1,005 Ft $5.92 $5,950

LTD Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - PCC 25 Ft $5.92 $14802 LTD Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - PCC 265 Ft $5.92 $1,569

03 Joint Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 17 SqFt $23.62 $397LTD Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - PCC 260 Ft $5.92 $1,539

TBGC 01 Joint Seal Damage Medium Joint Seal (Localized) 919 Ft $5.92 $5,443Joint Seal Damage High Joint Seal (Localized) 1,287 Ft $5.92 $7,620

TCGC 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 1,606 Ft $0.79 $1,269

TCOMPASSGC 01 Joint Seal Damage High Joint Seal (Localized) 7,746 Ft $5.92 $45,854

Large Patching High Patching - PCC Full Depth 110 SqFt $107.76 $11,837

TEGC 01 Joint Seal Damage Medium Joint Seal (Localized) 1,003 Ft $5.92 $5,936Joint Seal Damage High Joint Seal (Localized) 1,003 Ft $5.92 $5,936

LTD Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - PCC 80 Ft $5.92 $474


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. F

-18

Associated City


Cost Estimated


Moses Lake


TFGC

01 Joint Seal Damage Medium Joint Seal (Localized) 1,010 Ft $5.92 $5,980

02 Corner Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 5 SqFt $23.62 $111LTD Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - PCC 29 Ft $5.92 $173

03 Corner Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 4 SqFt $23.62 $89Joint Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 45 SqFt $23.62 $1,068

04 Corner Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 3 SqFt $23.62 $64Joint Spalling High Patching - PCC Partial Depth 8 SqFt $23.62 $191

TG1GC 01 Joint Seal Damage High Joint Seal (Localized) 2,141 Ft $5.92 $12,673

TG2GC 01 Corner Spalling High Patching - PCC Partial Depth 4 SqFt $23.62 $83

Joint Seal Damage Medium Joint Seal (Localized) 664 Ft $5.92 $3,929Joint Seal Damage High Joint Seal (Localized) 1,991 Ft $5.92 $11,788

TGGC 03 Corner Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 4 SqFt $23.62 $84

Joint Seal Damage Medium Joint Seal (Localized) 1,816 Ft $5.92 $10,752

THGC 02

Corner Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 10 SqFt $23.62 $237Joint Seal Damage Medium Joint Seal (Localized) 759 Ft $5.92 $4,492Joint Seal Damage High Joint Seal (Localized) 3,962 Ft $5.92 $23,457

Joint Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 48 SqFt $23.62 $1,139Joint Spalling High Patching - PCC Partial Depth 15 SqFt $23.62 $356

TJ1GC 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 137 Ft $0.79 $108TJ3GC 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 39 Ft $0.79 $31

Moses Lake


A01ML 02 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 527 Ft $0.79 $416L & T Cracking High Crack Sealing - AC 11 Ft $0.79 $9

AHLD34ML 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 189 Ft $0.79 $149L & T Cracking High Crack Sealing - AC 125 Ft $0.79 $99

R16ML 03 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 240 Ft $0.79 $189L & T Cracking High Crack Sealing - AC 320 Ft $0.79 $253


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. F

-19

Associated City


Cost Estimated


Moses Lake


T01ML 02


03 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 320 Ft $0.79 $253L & T Cracking High Crack Sealing - AC 20 Ft $0.79 $16

T02ML




Oak Harbor AJ Eisenberg TAOH 01 Patching High Patching - AC Deep 56 SqFt $35.91 $2,013

Ocean Shores

Ocean Shores Municipal

A01OS 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 5 Ft $0.83 $4

R15OS 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 1,594 Ft $0.83 $1,323



R02OD 01

L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 4,227 Ft $0.79 $3,340L & T Cracking High Crack Sealing - AC 201 Ft $0.79 $159

02 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 4,454 Ft $0.79 $3,519L & T Cracking High Crack Sealing - AC 16 Ft $0.79 $13

T01OD 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 158 Ft $0.79 $125T02OD 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 169 Ft $0.79 $134T03OD 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 38 Ft $0.79 $30

Okanogan Okanogan Legion A01OK 01



ACOV1OL 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 95 Ft $0.83 $79AHFGHOL 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 62 Ft $0.83 $51


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. F

-20

Associated City


Cost Estimated



ASPOL 01 Raveling High Patching - AC Shallow 8 SqFt $30.02 $235ATERMOL 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 2,601 Ft $0.83 $2,159

R08OL 01B L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 11 Ft $0.83 $9R17OL 02B L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 550 Ft $0.83 $457TAOL 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 450 Ft $0.83 $374TFOL 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 3,785 Ft $0.83 $3,141

THFOL 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 816 Ft $0.83 $677THGOL 02 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 10 Ft $0.83 $8THHOL 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 50 Ft $0.83 $42

TTERMOL 02 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 513 Ft $0.83 $426

Omak Omak Municipal

A01OM 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 648 Ft $0.79 $512

Raveling Medium Patching - AC Shallow 16 SqFt $27.29 $433A02OM 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 3,340 Ft $0.79 $2,639R17OM 01B L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 1,348 Ft $0.79 $1,065

T01OM 01 Alligator Cracking High Patching - AC Deep 256 SqFt $40.18 $10,272

L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 358 Ft $0.79 $282T06OM 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 84 Ft $0.79 $66

Oroville Dorothy Scott R15OV 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 74 Ft $0.79 $58


A01OT 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 66 Ft $0.79 $52A02OT 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 21 Ft $0.79 $17TAOT 02 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 20 Ft $0.79 $16

Port Angeles


A01PO 02 Alligator Cracking Medium Patching - AC Deep 244 SqFt $44.13 $10,76103 Joint Seal Damage High Joint Seal (Localized) 0 Ft $6.62 $0

A02PO 03 Joint Seal Damage Medium Joint Seal (Localized) 1,879 Ft $6.62 $12,440

A03PO 03 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 1,470 Ft $0.83 $1,220



Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. F

-21

Associated City


Cost Estimated


Port Angeles


AHLD08PO 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 31 Ft $0.83 $26R08PO 01B L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 289 Ft $0.83 $240TFPO 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 45 Ft $0.83 $37

Port Townsend

Jefferson County International

A02PT 01 Alligator Cracking Medium Patching - AC Deep 70 SqFt $35.91 $2,494A03PT 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 15 Ft $0.83 $12R08PT 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 767 Ft $0.83 $636T04PT 01 Alligator Cracking Medium Patching - AC Deep 63 SqFt $35.91 $2,274

T08PT 01 Alligator Cracking Medium Patching - AC Deep 51 SqFt $35.91 $1,814


Prosser Prosser

A01PR 01

L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 260 Ft $0.79 $205Rutting High Patching - AC Deep 1 SqFt $42.70 $43


A02PR 01 Oil/Fuel Damage N/A Patching - AC Shallow 27 SqFt $27.29 $74602 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 587 Ft $0.79 $46303 Joint Seal Damage High Joint Seal (Localized) 80 Ft $5.92 $474

A03PR 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 401 Ft $0.79 $31704 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 70 Ft $0.79 $55

A04PR 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 2,334 Ft $0.79 $1,844

Oil/Fuel Damage N/A Patching - AC Shallow 72 SqFt $27.29 $1,974R07PR 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 668 Ft $0.79 $528T01PR 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 90 Ft $0.79 $71T02PR 01 Raveling High Patching - AC Shallow 57 SqFt $27.29 $1,559


A01PM 01 Patching High Patching - AC Deep 438 SqFt $40.18 $17,614A02PM 02 Oil/Fuel Damage N/A Patching - AC Shallow 31 SqFt $27.29 $854

T01PM 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 2,834 Ft $0.79 $2,239



Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. F

-22

Associated City


Cost Estimated



T01PM 02 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 1,445 Ft $0.79 $1,142

Raveling Medium Patching - AC Shallow 254 SqFt $27.29 $6,918T02PM 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 85 Ft $0.79 $67

Puyallup Pierce County-Thun Field

A01TH 02 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 4,900 Ft $0.83 $4,067

Oil/Fuel Damage N/A Patching - AC Shallow 924 SqFt $30.02 $27,725

A02TH 01

Alligator Cracking Medium Patching - AC Deep 401 SqFt $35.91 $14,387Depression High Patching - AC Deep 62 SqFt $35.91 $2,213



AH1TH 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 138 Ft $0.83 $115


T01TH 01 Alligator Cracking Medium Patching - AC Deep 169 SqFt $35.91 $6,077

L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 4,360 Ft $0.83 $3,618

T02TH 02 Alligator Cracking Medium Patching - AC Deep 62 SqFt $35.91 $2,207

Depression High Patching - AC Deep 39 SqFt $35.91 $1,403L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 31 Ft $0.83 $26

T03TH 01

Alligator Cracking Medium Patching - AC Deep 15 SqFt $35.91 $529L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 206 Ft $0.83 $171


Quillayute Quillayute A01QU 01

Joint Seal Damage High Joint Seal (Localized) 69,500 Ft $6.62 $460,091Joint Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 193 SqFt $26.03 $5,014Joint Spalling High Patching - PCC Partial Depth 161 SqFt $26.03 $4,179LTD Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - PCC 1,367 Ft $6.62 $9,048Shattered Slab Medium Slab Replacement - PCC 3,728 SqFt $29.56 $110,210

R04QU 01 Corner Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 140 SqFt $26.03 $3,632


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. F

-23

Associated City


Cost Estimated


Quillayute Quillayute

R04QU 01


Joint Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 402 SqFt $26.03 $10,459LTD Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - PCC 1,685 Ft $6.62 $11,155

T01QU 01 Joint Seal Damage High Joint Seal (Localized) 7,412 Ft $6.62 $49,068

Joint Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 30 SqFt $26.03 $786LTD Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - PCC 760 Ft $6.62 $5,031

T02QU 01

Joint Seal Damage High Joint Seal (Localized) 18,063 Ft $6.62 $119,579Joint Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 66 SqFt $26.03 $1,719Joint Spalling High Patching - PCC Partial Depth 193 SqFt $26.03 $5,014LTD Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - PCC 375 Ft $6.62 $2,485Small Patching High Patching - PCC Full Depth 9 SqFt $78.45 $720

T03QU 01

Corner Break Medium Crack Sealing - PCC 33 Ft $6.62 $216Joint Seal Damage Medium Joint Seal (Localized) 1,647 Ft $6.62 $10,903Joint Seal Damage High Joint Seal (Localized) 14,823 Ft $6.62 $98,128

Joint Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 154 SqFt $26.03 $4,020LTD Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - PCC 748 Ft $6.62 $4,948

Quincy Quincy Municipal

A01QC 02 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 111 Ft $0.79 $88

Oil/Fuel Damage N/A Patching - AC Shallow 18 SqFt $27.29 $491R09QC 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 7,278 Ft $0.79 $5,750T01QC 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 408 Ft $0.79 $322


R16RN 03B Scaling Medium Slab Replacement - PCC 375 SqFt $40.74 $15,278TBRN 04 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 28 Ft $0.83 $23TDRN 02 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 102 Ft $0.83 $85TFRN 02 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 58 Ft $0.83 $48THRN 02 Raveling High Patching - AC Shallow 1 SqFt $30.02 $30


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. F

-24

Associated City


Cost Estimated



TKRN 02 Raveling Medium Patching - AC Shallow 280 SqFt $30.02 $8,406Raveling High Patching - AC Shallow 4 SqFt $30.02 $120

TLRN 02 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 36 Ft $0.83 $30TVLRN 01 Alligator Cracking Medium Patching - AC Deep 509 SqFt $44.13 $22,464TVLRN 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 1,015 Ft $0.83 $843

Republic Ferry County A01RE

01 Joint Seal Damage Medium Joint Seal (Localized) 80 Ft $5.92 $474

Scaling Medium Slab Replacement - PCC 400 SqFt $17.10 $6,84002 Raveling High Patching - AC Shallow 120 SqFt $27.29 $3,275

T01RE 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 241 Ft $0.79 $190

Richland Richland

A01RI 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 455 Ft $0.79 $360

A02RI

01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 143 Ft $0.79 $11304 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 112 Ft $0.79 $8906 Alligator Cracking Medium Patching - AC Deep 43 SqFt $44.44 $1,931



A03RI 03 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 60 Ft $0.79 $47

A04RI 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 5 Ft $0.79 $402 Rutting High Patching - AC Deep 23 SqFt $44.44 $1,00104 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 467 Ft $0.79 $369

T01RI 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 60 Ft $0.79 $48

Raveling High Patching - AC Shallow 18 SqFt $27.29 $493TA2RI 02 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 79 Ft $0.79 $62TA3RI 02 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 53 Ft $0.79 $42TA4RI 02 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 27 Ft $0.79 $21TA5RI 02 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 80 Ft $0.79 $63


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. F

-25

Associated City


Cost Estimated


Richland Richland

TARI 02 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 69 Ft $0.79 $55

TBRI 01


03 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 23 Ft $0.79 $18TCRI 02 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 15 Ft $0.79 $12TDRI 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 34 Ft $0.79 $27

Ritzville Pru Field

A01RZ 01 Alligator Cracking Medium Patching - AC Deep 88 SqFt $31.96 $2,815

L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 2,799 Ft $0.79 $2,211L & T Cracking High Crack Sealing - AC 873 Ft $0.79 $690

T01RZ

01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 1,933 Ft $0.79 $1,52701 Swelling High Patching - AC Deep 16 SqFt $31.96 $50802 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 480 Ft $0.79 $37902 L & T Cracking High Crack Sealing - AC 91 Ft $0.79 $72

T02RZ 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 126 Ft $0.79 $100Sequim Sequim Valley R09SE 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 163 Ft $0.83 $136


A01SH 01

Corner Spalling High Patching - PCC Partial Depth 36 SqFt $26.03 $936Joint Seal Damage Medium Joint Seal (Localized) 6,259 Ft $6.62 $41,435Joint Seal Damage High Joint Seal (Localized) 18,777 Ft $6.62 $124,305

Joint Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 43 SqFt $26.03 $1,123LTD Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - PCC 919 Ft $6.62 $6,080

Scaling High Slab Replacement - PCC 6,262 SqFt $34.23 $214,339

A02SH 01 Alligator Cracking Medium Patching - AC Deep 39 SqFt $49.24 $1,92402 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 113 Ft $0.83 $94

T01SH 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 1,260 Ft $0.83 $1,045T02SH 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 24 Ft $0.83 $20


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. F

-26

Associated City


Cost Estimated



T03SH 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 529 Ft $0.83 $439T07SH 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 138 Ft $0.83 $115

T09SH 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 137 Ft $0.83 $114


T11SH 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 910 Ft $0.83 $756L & T Cracking High Crack Sealing - AC 172 Ft $0.83 $143

Raveling Medium Patching - AC Shallow 658 SqFt $30.02 $19,752TA1SH 02 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 48 Ft $0.83 $40TA4SH 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 108 Ft $0.83 $90TASH 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 268 Ft $0.83 $222

Silverdale APEX

A02HF 01 Raveling Medium Patching - AC Shallow 100 SqFt $30.02 $3,002

TASD 01 Alligator Cracking Medium Patching - AC Deep 620 SqFt $35.91 $22,265

L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 272 Ft $0.83 $225TBHF 01 Alligator Cracking Medium Patching - AC Deep 83 SqFt $35.91 $2,961

Spokane Felts Field

A01FL 06 Alligator Cracking Medium Patching - AC Deep 124 SqFt $42.70 $5,290

L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 1,231 Ft $0.79 $972L & T Cracking High Crack Sealing - AC 118 Ft $0.79 $93

A04FL 02 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 215 Ft $0.79 $169A06FL 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 1,035 Ft $0.79 $818A07FL 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 140 Ft $0.79 $111

R03LFL 01A

Corner Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 88 SqFt $23.62 $2,080Joint Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 388 SqFt $23.62 $9,153Joint Spalling High Patching - PCC Partial Depth 44 SqFt $23.62 $1,040

Scaling Medium Slab Replacement - PCC 24,546 SqFt $29.11 $714,518Scaling High Slab Replacement - PCC 2,046 SqFt $29.11 $59,543


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. F

-27

Associated City


Cost Estimated


Spokane Felts Field

R03LFL

01B Joint Seal Damage Medium Joint Seal (Localized) 2,586 Ft $5.92 $15,311

01C

Corner Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 29 SqFt $23.62 $693Joint Seal Damage Medium Joint Seal (Localized) 2,586 Ft $5.92 $15,311

Joint Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 106 SqFt $23.62 $2,496Scaling Medium Slab Replacement - PCC 8,182 SqFt $29.11 $238,173Scaling High Slab Replacement - PCC 2,046 SqFt $29.11 $59,543

R03RFL 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 71 Ft $0.79 $56

TAFL


Raveling Medium Patching - AC Shallow 1,467 SqFt $27.29 $40,02002 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 236 Ft $0.79 $18703 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 7 Ft $0.79 $604 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 497 Ft $0.79 $393

TBFL 01 Alligator Cracking Medium Patching - AC Deep 56 SqFt $42.70 $2,387


TDFL 01 Corner Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 3 SqFt $23.62 $64Joint Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 71 SqFt $23.62 $1,678

Scaling Medium Slab Replacement - PCC 672 SqFt $29.11 $19,550

Spokane Mead Flying Service

A01ME 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 50 Ft $0.79 $40A02ME 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 30 Ft $0.79 $24


A01SU 03 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 187 Ft $0.79 $14804 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 110 Ft $0.79 $87

R07SU 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 7,004 Ft $0.79 $5,53402 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 604 Ft $0.79 $477

T03SU 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 1,373 Ft $0.79 $1,085L & T Cracking High Crack Sealing - AC 140 Ft $0.79 $111


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. F

-28

Associated City


Cost Estimated



A01TN



Oil/Fuel Damage N/A Patching - AC Shallow 63 SqFt $30.02 $1,89606 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 37 Ft $0.83 $31




Oil/Fuel Damage N/A Patching - AC Shallow 25 SqFt $30.02 $74112 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 6,707 Ft $0.83 $5,567

13 Raveling Medium Patching - AC Shallow 69 SqFt $30.02 $2,084Raveling High Patching - AC Shallow 2,186 SqFt $30.02 $65,636

14 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 1,059 Ft $0.83 $87915 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 277 Ft $0.83 $23016 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 735 Ft $0.83 $61017 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 3,173 Ft $0.83 $2,63419 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 388 Ft $0.83 $322

AH35TN 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 228 Ft $0.83 $189R17TN 01A L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 5,454 Ft $0.83 $4,527

TA1TN 01 Alligator Cracking Medium Patching - AC Deep 59 SqFt $44.13 $2,609

L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 207 Ft $0.83 $171TA2TN 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 630 Ft $0.83 $523TA3TN 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 603 Ft $0.83 $500

TATN 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 830 Ft $0.83 $68902 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 2,648 Ft $0.83 $2,198

Tekoa Willard Field R04TE 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 973 Ft $0.79 $769T01TE 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 36 Ft $0.79 $28


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. F

-29

Associated City


Cost Estimated


Toledo Ed Carlson Memorial-South Lewis County

T02TO 02 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 49 Ft $0.83 $41

Tonasket Tonasket Municipal T01TK 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 49 Ft $0.79 $39


A03TW 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 129 Ft $0.79 $102T03TW 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 124 Ft $0.79 $98


A02PE 01


02 Oil/Fuel Damage N/A Patching - AC Shallow 198 SqFt $30.02 $5,94703 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 92 Ft $0.83 $77

T01PE 02 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 44 Ft $0.83 $37L & T Cracking High Crack Sealing - AC 37 Ft $0.83 $31

T10PE 01 Raveling Medium Patching - AC Shallow 1,946 SqFt $30.02 $58,431

Walla Walla


AGAWW

01

Corner Break Medium Crack Sealing - PCC 67 Ft $5.92 $397Joint Seal Damage Medium Joint Seal (Localized) 29,121 Ft $5.92 $172,396Joint Seal Damage High Joint Seal (Localized) 16,427 Ft $5.92 $97,249

LTD Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - PCC 562 Ft $5.92 $3,329Scaling Medium Slab Replacement - PCC 6,138 SqFt $43.52 $267,120Scaling High Slab Replacement - PCC 4,603 SqFt $43.52 $200,340

Shattered Slab Medium Slab Replacement - PCC 4,603 SqFt $43.52 $200,340

05


LTD Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - PCC 1,042 Ft $5.92 $6,170LTD Cracking High Slab Replacement - PCC 1,421 SqFt $43.52 $61,846

Scaling High Slab Replacement - PCC 9,948 SqFt $43.52 $432,922ATERMWW 01 Corner Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 22 SqFt $23.62 $530


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. F

-30

Associated City


Cost Estimated


Walla Walla


ATERMWW 01 Joint Spalling Medium Patching - PCC Partial Depth 18 SqFt $23.62 $424TAWW 05 Joint Reflection Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 274 Ft $0.79 $217

TBWW 01 Raveling Medium Patching - AC Shallow 1 SqFt $27.29 $2702 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 404 Ft $0.79 $319

Warden Warden A01WA 01 Depression High Patching - AC Deep 69 SqFt $31.96 $2,219R17WA 02 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 86 Ft $0.79 $68


A02WV 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 445 Ft $0.79 $352


A03WV 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 95 Ft $0.79 $75


R07WV 01 Alligator Cracking High Patching - AC Deep 340 SqFt $31.96 $10,855

L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 3,061 Ft $0.79 $2,418T01WV 01 Raveling High Patching - AC Shallow 1 SqFt $27.29 $27

T02WV 01

Alligator Cracking Medium Patching - AC Deep 68 SqFt $31.96 $2,161Alligator Cracking High Patching - AC Deep 22 SqFt $31.96 $716

L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 15 Ft $0.79 $12Raveling High Patching - AC Shallow 67 SqFt $27.29 $1,823

T03WV 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 134 Ft $0.79 $106



A01WN 02

L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 200 Ft $0.79 $158Raveling Medium Patching - AC Shallow 103 SqFt $27.29 $2,814Raveling High Patching - AC Shallow 206 SqFt $27.29 $5,627

05 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 1,112 Ft $0.79 $87908 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 362 Ft $0.79 $286

A02WN 03 Joint Seal Damage High Joint Seal (Localized) 160 Ft $5.92 $947A03WN 02 Scaling Medium Slab Replacement - PCC 1,375 SqFt $43.52 $59,839


Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. F

-31

Associated City


Cost Estimated



ATERMWN 02 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 10 Ft $0.79 $8

R12WN 01A L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 859 Ft $0.79 $67902B L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 136 Ft $0.79 $107

TA3WN 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 142 Ft $0.79 $11202 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 7 Ft $0.79 $6

TAWN 06 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 3 Ft $0.79 $2

TCWN 01 L & T Cracking High Crack Sealing - AC 19 Ft $0.79 $15


Raveling High Patching - AC Shallow 4 SqFt $27.29 $115TGWN 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 38 Ft $0.79 $30

THWN 03 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 5 Ft $0.79 $405 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 105 Ft $0.79 $83

Westport Westport A02WE 01 Raveling High Patching - AC Shallow 50 SqFt $30.02 $1,501

T01WE 01 Alligator Cracking High Patching - AC Deep 19 SqFt $35.91 $687



A01WL 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 712 Ft $0.79 $562

Raveling Medium Patching - AC Shallow 315 SqFt $27.29 $8,591A03WL 02 LTD Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - PCC 43 Ft $5.92 $257


A04MV 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 1,344 Ft $0.79 $1,062



T01MV 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 403 Ft $0.79 $318

Raveling Medium Patching - AC Shallow 19 SqFt $27.29 $509T04MV 01 L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 376 Ft $0.79 $297

T05MV 02 Alligator Cracking Medium Patching - AC Deep 30 SqFt $42.70 $1,279



Washington S

tatewide A

irport Pavem

ent Managem

ent Report

June 2013

Applied P

avement T

echnology, Inc. F

-32

Associated City


Cost Estimated


Winthrop Methow Valley State T05MV 03

Alligator Cracking High Patching - AC Deep 83 SqFt $42.70 $3,524L & T Cracking Medium Crack Sealing - AC 8 Ft $0.79 $6

statewide airport pavement management report - … · washington statewide airport pavement...

Documents