star strangeness! k0sk0s k+k+ (preliminary)

26
STAR STRANGENESS! K 0 s K + (Preliminary)

Post on 20-Dec-2015

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: STAR STRANGENESS! K0sK0s    K+K+ (Preliminary)

STAR STRANGENESS!

K0s

K+

(Preliminary)

Page 2: STAR STRANGENESS! K0sK0s    K+K+ (Preliminary)

What do we measure?

K+ (us) 494MeV ++ccm

K0s (ds) 498MeV ++ ccm

uds) 1116MeV p+- ccm

(dss) 1321MeV +- ccm

(sss) 1672MeV +K- ccm

0 (ss) 1020MeV K++K+ ccm

+ anti-particles + other more exotic resonances ((1520)!)

Page 3: STAR STRANGENESS! K0sK0s    K+K+ (Preliminary)

What do we measure (2)?

Particle yields

How much is created?

Spectra (dN/dy, dN/dpt, d2N/dydpt)

Where and when are they created and what are the dynamics?

Particle ratios

What are the chemical potentials?

Interferometry

How large is the source and how long did it exist?

Page 4: STAR STRANGENESS! K0sK0s    K+K+ (Preliminary)

Tfireball < Tc Hadron gas

Hard to make S 0 particles

+ N + K (Ethresh 530MeV) + K + (Ethresh 1420MeV)

Mtm phase space suppressedNeed to create 3 qq pairs

(initially there are no q) with similar momenta in a region already containing many quarks.

Why are we interested in Strangeness production?

Tfireball >Tc QGP

Easy to make s quarks E=2ms ( 300MeV)Free gluons

g-g fusion - dominate s s creation faster reaction time than qq

Pauli blocking may aid creation of s s quarks

( probably not true at high T, too many states).

¯

¯¯

¯

¯

¯

Page 5: STAR STRANGENESS! K0sK0s    K+K+ (Preliminary)

What is the best thing to measure?

While K’s carry ~70% of the strangeness they are easily produced in the final stage reactions as the hadrons in the expanding gas interact and

already show an enhancement over N-N collisions at energies too low

to form a QGP.

Want to look at the yields of multi-strange (anti-)baryons

production suppressed in Hadron Gas because

a) need large energy to create

b) need to create u d s where there are already many ud

c) need to create them in the same mtm phase space

Looking at the particle ratios ptells you the s/u ratio -> 1 if there is chemical equilibration

¯

¯¯¯

¯ ¯ ¯¯

Page 6: STAR STRANGENESS! K0sK0s    K+K+ (Preliminary)

Evidence for Strangeness Enhancement - WA97 results

Page 7: STAR STRANGENESS! K0sK0s    K+K+ (Preliminary)

Strange particle ratios

AGS > 1 and is higher than SPS.

Seems to be a clear strangeness enhancement between pA and AA

collisions at the SPS

Page 8: STAR STRANGENESS! K0sK0s    K+K+ (Preliminary)

Where are the strange particles produced?

If heavy ion collisions were just N-N reaction superpositions

(uds) concentrated in the baryon rich projectile regions

(uds), K0s(ds) peaked at mid-rapidity

due to their sea-quark content

PROBLEM!

What if there is any stopping?

Baryon-rich projectile and baryon-free

“fire-ball” region become merged

Have to separate fire-ball creation from that merely due to associated production

Page 9: STAR STRANGENESS! K0sK0s    K+K+ (Preliminary)

Stopping and the net distribution

We expect that the net

yield should follow the net p yield.

However there is a distinct “bump” about mid-rapidity in the

distribution that is not observed in the p.

Is this NEW physics?

Or is it evidence of feed-down into the channel that has yet to be corrected properly. NA49 have

recently obtained and results

which may help answer this question

Page 10: STAR STRANGENESS! K0sK0s    K+K+ (Preliminary)

Freeze out “Temperature” vs Mass

From two particle correlation studies you can extract 2/T from R.

~50% transverse kinetic energy goes into radial flow.

-> Very important for any global thermo-chemical analysis

Tprop = 120 ±10MeV

= 0.5

N.B

(Na49) T=305 MeV

(Na50) T=213 MeV

Also 3x smaller yield

Page 11: STAR STRANGENESS! K0sK0s    K+K+ (Preliminary)
Page 12: STAR STRANGENESS! K0sK0s    K+K+ (Preliminary)
Page 13: STAR STRANGENESS! K0sK0s    K+K+ (Preliminary)

K+/- +/- +

K+, K- High Pt identification via “Kink”Analysis

Page 14: STAR STRANGENESS! K0sK0s    K+K+ (Preliminary)

Finding V0s

Page 15: STAR STRANGENESS! K0sK0s    K+K+ (Preliminary)

STAR TPC Acceptance for B=0.25T (Half Field)

Page 16: STAR STRANGENESS! K0sK0s    K+K+ (Preliminary)

The peaks in their glory

332K Events |z|<50cm, |y|=0.5, GeV/c

0.16/event 0.13/event

Page 17: STAR STRANGENESS! K0sK0s    K+K+ (Preliminary)

154K MinBias Events |z|<50cm, |y|=0.5, GeV/c

And there’s more

0.0009/event0.2/event

Page 18: STAR STRANGENESS! K0sK0s    K+K+ (Preliminary)

STAR STRANGENESS!

K0s

K+

(Preliminary)

Page 19: STAR STRANGENESS! K0sK0s    K+K+ (Preliminary)

In case you thought it was easy…

Before

Page 20: STAR STRANGENESS! K0sK0s    K+K+ (Preliminary)

And Voila!!!!

After

Page 21: STAR STRANGENESS! K0sK0s    K+K+ (Preliminary)

• Large peaks at 2 o’clock and 8 o’clock

• TPC pad row “floating”

Fine way to calibrate a detector..

Now in ExB “Hell”

Page 22: STAR STRANGENESS! K0sK0s    K+K+ (Preliminary)

• Baryons distributions carry information related to– stopping and particle production– baryon chemical potential– thermal equilibrium

• p/p ratio should be sensitive•

• Last call for RHIC predictions (nucl-th/9907090) at sNN = 200 GeV :– Quark Coalescence: p/p = 0.6– Fireball: p/p = 0.9 - 1.0– Hijing: p/p = 0.8– RQMD: p/p = 0.5

Page 23: STAR STRANGENESS! K0sK0s    K+K+ (Preliminary)

p/p: centrality and pt dependence

• No strong pt dependence• Weak centrality dependence

more stopping and/or other process ?

85% centrality 6% Ratio for 0.3 < |y| < 0.4

Page 24: STAR STRANGENESS! K0sK0s    K+K+ (Preliminary)

/ preliminary

= 4 MeV

332K min bias Events0 < pt < 2.3 GeV/c0.5<y<0.5

¯

Page 25: STAR STRANGENESS! K0sK0s    K+K+ (Preliminary)

p/p

@AGS

@SPS

p/ p E866

+

+

p/ p NA49

WA97

p/ p STAR

STAR-

---

-

AGS SPS RHIC

STAR Preliminary

/

ratio

Anti-Baryon/Baryon Ratio

Preliminary: / = 0.70 0.05 (stat) 0.2 (syst)

p/p = 0.65 0.03 (stat.) 0.06 (sys.) ¯

Page 26: STAR STRANGENESS! K0sK0s    K+K+ (Preliminary)

Conclusion

Stay tuned for QM2001!!!!