strangeness measurements with the experiment
DESCRIPTION
Strangeness measurements with the Experiment. G á bor Veres Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA for the Collaboration. Strangeness in Quark Matter ’06 UCLA, California, March 27, 2006. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Gábor Veres Strangeness in Quark Matter ‘06, UCLA, March 27, 2006
1
Strangeness measurements with the Experiment
Gábor VeresEötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USAfor the Collaboration
Strangeness in Quark Matter ’06UCLA, California, March 27, 2006
Gábor Veres Strangeness in Quark Matter ‘06, UCLA, March 27, 2006
2
Collaboration (March 2006)
Burak Alver, Birger Back, Mark Baker, Maarten Ballintijn, Donald Barton, Russell Betts, Richard
Bindel,
Wit Busza (Spokesperson), Zhengwei Chai, Vasundhara Chetluru, Edmundo García, Tomasz
Gburek, Kristjan Gulbrandsen, Clive Halliwell, Joshua Hamblen, Ian Harnarine, Conor Henderson,
David Hofman, Richard Hollis, Roman Hołyński, Burt Holzman, Aneta Iordanova, Jay Kane,
Piotr Kulinich, Chia Ming Kuo, Wei Li, Willis Lin, Constantin Loizides, Steven Manly, Alice
Mignerey,
Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen, Rachid Nouicer, Andrzej Olszewski, Robert Pak, Corey Reed,
Eric Richardson, Christof Roland, Gunther Roland, Joe Sagerer, Iouri Sedykh, Chadd Smith,
Maciej Stankiewicz, Peter Steinberg, George Stephans, Andrei Sukhanov, Artur Szostak,
Marguerite Belt Tonjes, Adam Trzupek, Sergei Vaurynovich, Robin Verdier, Gábor Veres,
Peter Walters, Edward Wenger, Donald Willhelm, Frank Wolfs, Barbara Wosiek, Krzysztof
Woźniak, Shaun Wyngaardt, Bolek Wysłouch
ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORYINSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR PHYSICS PAN, KRAKOW MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
NATIONAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY, TAIWAN UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGOUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER
Gábor Veres Strangeness in Quark Matter ‘06, UCLA, March 27, 2006
3
Outline
Identification of strange particles in PHOBOS slow particles stopping in the active part of the detector dE/dx in the Si spectrometer Time Of Flight measurement reconstruction of mesons
Identified particle spectra and ratios in Au+Au at 62.4 GeV
Identified particle spectra and ratios in d+Au at 200 GeV
Connections to net baryons and baryon transport
New techniques to reconstruct the meson at low pT
Gábor Veres Strangeness in Quark Matter ‘06, UCLA, March 27, 2006
4
The PHOBOS detector
137000 Silicon Pad Channels
1m
Spectrometer
Octagon
Vertex
Ring Counters
Paddle TriggerCounters
Čerenkov Counter
ProtonCalorimeter
Calorimeter
Time of Flight
Spectrometertrigger
Gábor Veres Strangeness in Quark Matter ‘06, UCLA, March 27, 2006
5
PID Capabilities of PHOBOS
pT (GeV/c)0.03 0.5 5.0
Stoppingparticles dE/dx TOF
Particle ID from low to high pT
Eloss (MeV)1 2 3 4 50
p (GeV/c)
30
40
50
60
70
1/v
(ps/
cm)
PRC 70 (2004) 051901(R)
p+p
K +K + -
++-
p (GeV/c)
K+
K–
mK+K–
Gábor Veres Strangeness in Quark Matter ‘06, UCLA, March 27, 2006
6
Particle identification at low pT
10 cm
z
-x
70 cm
PHOBOS Spectrometer:• 16 layers of silicon wafers• fine pixelization, precise deposited energy measurement• collision vertex close (10 cm) to spectrometer• near mid-rapidity coverage• dipole magnetic field of 2T at maximum, but small at the first layers
• pT > 0.2 GeV/c track curvature in B field p,charge, dE/dx in Si mass ToF • pT = 0.03 – 0.2 GeV/c low-p particles stop in silicon wafers p, mass
B field negligible no charge identification
Gábor Veres Strangeness in Quark Matter ‘06, UCLA, March 27, 2006
7
Mass measurement
(‘energy-range’ method):
Cuts on dE/dx per plane ”MASS HYPOTHESIS”
Search for particles ranging out
in the 5th spectrometer plane:
A B C D E
dE
/dx
Ek= 8 MeV
p Ek=21 MeV
K Ek=19 MeV Cuts on Eloss (Ek=kinetic energy)
”MOMENTUM HYPOTHESIS”
• Eloss = dE (kinetic energy)• <dE/dx> Eloss m
(1/2) ( m2)
Corrections• acceptance • efficiency • background
silicon plane
Finding very low pT particles
0 10 20 Z [cm]
X[c
m]
AB
CD
EF
Be pipe .
.
Gábor Veres Strangeness in Quark Matter ‘06, UCLA, March 27, 2006
8
Test of the method:
Reconstruction of lowmomentum MC particles
Eloss [MeV]
<d
E/d
x>
Elo
ss [
10-3
Ge
V2/c
m]
(+,)
(K+,K–)
(p,p)
MC
Measuring particle mass at low pT
Eloss [MeV]
(+,)
(K+,K–)
(p,p)
Au+Au sNN=200 GeV 15% most central
DATA
PRC 70 (2004) 051901(R)
<d
E/d
x>
Elo
ss
[1
0-3G
eV
2/c
m]
Gábor Veres Strangeness in Quark Matter ‘06, UCLA, March 27, 2006
9
Medium pT: PID via dE/dx in the Si
0 0.5 1 1.5p [GeV/c]
5
10
15
0
dE
/dx
[M.I
.P.]
dE/dx
• Calibrated and well studied dE/dx measurement in the Spectrometer
• Particles separated in the 1/2 region of the Bethe-Bloch function
• Track-by-track identification: –K: up to p0.4 GeV/c K–p: up to p0.8 GeV/c
• Yields can be extracted using fits up to p1.5 GeV/c for protons (PID in the statistical sense)
A realistic line-shape is used: natural tail to higher dE/dx (Landau-fluctuations)
• the mean positions are given by the Bethe-Bloch formula• the width follows the empirical relation: dE/dx ~ (dE/dx)0.9 • only the amplitudes are free fit parameters
K
p
d
Gábor Veres Strangeness in Quark Matter ‘06, UCLA, March 27, 2006
10
Medium pT: PID via Time of Flight• Improved time measurement (new T0 detectors, better cables and correction for timing drifts)
• Particles separated: 1/ vs. p (even better constraint than dE/dx)
• Track-by-track identification: –K: up to p1.3 GeV/c K–p: up to p2.3 GeV/c
• Yields can be extracted using fits up to p5 GeV/c for protons (PID in the statistical sense)
0 1 2 3 4 5p [GeV/c]
50
45
40
35
30
60
55
1/v
[ps
/cm
]
K
p
d
A realistic line-shape is used reflecting the time resolution• the mean positions are given by 1/v=m2/p2+1/c2
• the width: same for all species (time resolution does not depend on mass) • only the amplitudes are free fit parameters
Gábor Veres Strangeness in Quark Matter ‘06, UCLA, March 27, 2006
11
Acceptance of the PID
Time of Flight + tracking
Very low pT particles dE/dx in the Si Spectrometer
p=const.lines
different bending directions
Gábor Veres Strangeness in Quark Matter ‘06, UCLA, March 27, 2006
12
Synthesis of dE/dx and TOF data
• Data merged from both detectors and bending directions
• Small but finite rapidity range
• Additional error estimated from difference between linear and constant fit
0 0.5 1.0 1.5y0
1
2
3
4
pT [
GeV
/c]
0 0.5 1.0 1.5y
3
2
2.5
d2N
/ 2p
Td
pTd
y [ G
eV–
2c2
]
Proton data pointson the pT-y plane
Invariant yieldsat pT=0.69 GeV/c
PHOBOSpreliminary
PHOBOSpreliminary
Gábor Veres Strangeness in Quark Matter ‘06, UCLA, March 27, 2006
13Identified spectra in Au+Au at 62.4 GeV
Corrections:• Acceptance, efficiency• Occupancy in the spectrometer• Feed-down from weak decays (DCA fits and estimates)• Ghosts (fakes), secondaries• Dead channels in the detector• Momentum resolution
Centrality bins:0-15% Npart=294±1015-30% 160±1030-50% 78±8
• Smooth centrality dependence• Large baryon/meson ratios at high pT
Gábor Veres Strangeness in Quark Matter ‘06, UCLA, March 27, 2006
14
Antiparticle to particle ratios
Results at 62.4 GeV fit smoothly into the energy evolution of the antiparticle/particle ratios
(ratios are integratedover the accessiblepT and y range in centralcollisions)
Gábor Veres Strangeness in Quark Matter ‘06, UCLA, March 27, 2006
15
Fraction of protons among all hadrons
p>++K+ line
At pT2.5–3 GeV/c, baryons become dominantin central Au+Au collisions at 62.4 GeV
PHOBOS Preliminary
Au+Au 62.4 GeV
(p>– or p>K–) line
Gábor Veres Strangeness in Quark Matter ‘06, UCLA, March 27, 2006
16
Open symbols: not feeddown-corrected
• central A+A collisions• data from: E802 (4%) NA44 (3.7%) NA49 (5%) STAR (5% and 6%) PHENIX (5%) PHOBOS (15%)
PHOBOS Preliminary
PHOBOS Preliminary
p/p
• p/+ ‘crossing’ is there at all measured energies• ‘crossing’ pT value increases with energy• contribution of ‘pair produced’ protons grows with energy• p/p at high pT grows with energy since pT spectra of p and p are similar
pT where p/+=1, as a function of s
Gábor Veres Strangeness in Quark Matter ‘06, UCLA, March 27, 2006
17Low pT spectra of identified particles in Au+Au collisions
at 62.4 GeV
Blast wave fit parameters: 0-15%: Tfo = 99 MeV, <T>=0.5115-30%: Tfo = 98 MeV, <T>=0.5130-50%: Tfo = 97 MeV, <T>=0.49
d2 N
/2p
Td
pTd
y [
Ge
V2
c2 ]
d
2 N/2
pTd
pTd
y [
Ge
V2
c2 ]
d2 N
/2p
Td
pTd
y [
Ge
V2
c2 ]
Fit to the high pT part and extrapolating to low pT
Gábor Veres Strangeness in Quark Matter ‘06, UCLA, March 27, 2006
18
Low pT identified spectra, Au+Au at 200 GeV
No enhancement for pions at low pT observed Flattening of (p+p) spectra down to very low pT
(consistent with transverse expansion of the system)
• Blast Wave fit: Tfo= 99 MeV <T> = 0.54
T= 229 MeV for (++–) 293 MeV for (K++ K–) 392 MeV for (p + p)
mT =pT2+mh
2
B-E fit
BWF fit
d2N
/2p
Td
pTd
y [G
eV
–2c2
]
d2N/2mTdmTdy=A[exp(mT/T)±1]–1
• Bose-Einstein fit:
PHOBOS, PR C70, 051901 (R) (2004) PHENIX, PR C69, 034909 (2004)
Gábor Veres Strangeness in Quark Matter ‘06, UCLA, March 27, 2006
19
Low pT identified spectra, d+Au at 200 GeV
pT range:(++-) : > 0.03 GeV/c
(K++ K-): > 0.09 GeV/c
(p + p) : > 0.14 GeV/c
Background corrections: very low-pT:
(++-) : 20%
(K++ K-): 10%
(p + p) : 20% intermediate pT
(p + p) : 20%
Systematic uncertainties: very low pT: 30% intermediate pT : 15%
Event selection: described in PRL 93, 082301
d2N
/2p
Td
pTd
y [
Ge
V
c2]
Blast wave fit:
Tfo = 152 MeV<T>=0.37
Gábor Veres Strangeness in Quark Matter ‘06, UCLA, March 27, 2006
20
mT-scaling in d+Au collisions at 200 GeV
• mT spectra of (++–), (K++K–) and (p + p) have similar shape
• (K++ K-) yield is smaller
than the other species by a factor of 2 (strangeness suppression)
• Local slopes of mT spectra are similar
Tlo
cal[G
eV/c
2 ]d
2 N/2
pTd
pTd
y [G
eV–2
c2 ]
Gábor Veres Strangeness in Quark Matter ‘06, UCLA, March 27, 2006
21mT scaling in d+Au vs. Au+Au at 200 GeVT
loc[
GeV
/c2 ]
d2 N
/2m
Td
mTd
y [G
eV–2
c4 ]
PRC 70 (2004) 051901(R)
• In central Au+Au, larger flattening of p+p mT spectra at small pT
• Low pT spectra of p+p can constrain models describing collective transverse expansion of the system
Tlo
c[G
eV/c
2 ]d
2 N/2
mTd
mTd
y [G
eV–2
c4 ]
Gábor Veres Strangeness in Quark Matter ‘06, UCLA, March 27, 2006
22
Net proton yield at midrapidity, Au+Au
62.4 GeV: PHOBOS Preliminary200 GeV: PHENIX PRC 69, 024904 (2004) (correlated errors assumed: underestimated errors)
• Net protons: p–p
• Their yield is proportional to Npart within errors!
Really strange result:
• Number of protons‘transported’ to midrapidityper participant pair isindependent of numberof collisions per participant!
PHOBOS
Preliminary
Gábor Veres Strangeness in Quark Matter ‘06, UCLA, March 27, 2006
23
meson studies
Tracking modified for -s: ● Si layers 0-5 (no mag. field) straight lines● Si layers 8-9 (low mag. field) 3D-, 4D-fits
• extends the PID (strangeness scope) of PHOBOS in a special direction• low pT is an important tool to study the hot medium created
0 0.5 1pT [GeV/c]
0
0.5
1
y
0 0.5 1 1.50
100
200
Single mesonacceptance (MC)
pT [GeV/c]
Kaons in differentspectrometer arms
Kaons in the same arm
MC
Gábor Veres Strangeness in Quark Matter ‘06, UCLA, March 27, 2006
24
mass resolution at very low pT (MC study)
No background,only mesons
With high multiplicity background ( embedded in Au+Au data)
Single with 0<pT<0.13 GeV
=8.4 MeV
MK+K– [GeV/c2]1 1.02 1.04
2000
1500
1000
500
0
=11.5 MeV
MK+K– [GeV/c2]1 1.02 1.04
100
50
0
Table values: M=1.019 GeV/c2
=4.26 MeV/c2
MCMC
Gábor Veres Strangeness in Quark Matter ‘06, UCLA, March 27, 2006
25
signal level estimation
BRAHMS (nucl-ex/0403050) K– rapidity distribution: Gaussian, width 2.14
Total # of 's per 10% most central event: 36
STAR (nucl-ex/0406003)dN/dy6.65 for ||<0.5, T=357 MeV
Assumptions for 's: Rapidity: Gaussian, width=2.14 pT:
rapidity distributions:NA49 (nucl-ex/0305017)
K+
K–
pTexp( )T
–pT+M 22
Gábor Veres Strangeness in Quark Matter ‘06, UCLA, March 27, 2006
26
Expected signal size, no background
Single mesons, 0.0 < pT < 0.13 GeV/c
MK+K– [GeV/c2]
• Expected signal from all our Au+Au events at 200 GeV passing event selection (67 M events)
• ~ Npart assumed
• y distribution shape assumed to be centrality independent
• pT slope vs. centrality from STAR
MC
Gábor Veres Strangeness in Quark Matter ‘06, UCLA, March 27, 2006
27
Preliminary meson studies
• A new method of meson reconstruction was developed.
• Acceptance of the PHOBOS detector for low pT was studied.
• The method was tested on • single MC • single MC embedded into real data events
• The method is being applied on real data and its performance
is being studied.
Gábor Veres Strangeness in Quark Matter ‘06, UCLA, March 27, 2006
28
Summary
• PHOBOS developed various PID techniques: stopping low pT particles, dE/dx, TOF, resonance spectroscopy • No evidence for enhanced production of very low pT pions in the most central Au+Au collisions at 62.4 and 200 GeV
• Flattening of p+p mT spectra at low pT in the 15% most central Au+Au collisions at 62.4 and 200 GeV
• Approximate mT scaling of particle spectra for d+Au collisions at low and intermediate pT
• At high pT, baryons become dominant over mesons. Net baryon yield per participant is centrality independent
• Extensive MC studies on sensitivity to mesons
Gábor Veres Strangeness in Quark Matter ‘06, UCLA, March 27, 2006
29
backups
Gábor Veres Strangeness in Quark Matter ‘06, UCLA, March 27, 2006
30
PHOBOS magnetic field
Phobos Si Spectrometer Phobos Magnetic Field (Gauss)
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
Gábor Veres Strangeness in Quark Matter ‘06, UCLA, March 27, 2006
31PID Measurement in PHOBOS Spectrometer
<d
E/d
x>
pT > 0.2 GeV/c pT = 0.03 - 0.2 GeV/c
Etot = dEi , i=A, ... ,E
Mpi = Ei dEi/dx
Mp = < Mpi >
/K separation: pT < ~0.6 GeV/cp(p) separation: pT < ~1.2 GeV/c
Kp
p+p
K +K + -
++-
Gábor Veres Strangeness in Quark Matter ‘06, UCLA, March 27, 2006
32
d+Au, Model Comparison
Gábor Veres Strangeness in Quark Matter ‘06, UCLA, March 27, 2006
33