soil as a wastewater treatment medium by j.g. mexal department of agronomy & horticulture new...
Post on 21-Dec-2015
216 views
TRANSCRIPT
Soil as a Wastewater Treatment Medium
By
J.G. Mexal
Department of Agronomy & Horticulture
New Mexico State University
Soil as a Treatment Slow Rate Land Application System• “Slow rate land application for wastewater
treatment is a proven technology for municipal and other organic wastewaters. Used for over one hundred years, it has evolved from a ‘disposal’ method to one that can be used to recycle wastewater onto agricultural crops, forests, or park lands.”
• EPA 1992
Soil as a Treatment
Who Does It?Location Wastewater Size (ac) SpeciesJacksonville, FL secondary 6,000 ‘forest’
Clayton Co., GA secondary 3,600 Loblolly pine
Myrtle Beach, SC secondary 1,500 Hardwoods
Edenton, NC chlorinated 300 Sycamore
Woodburn, OR secondary 80 Poplar
Adelaide, So.Aust.
Secondary 35 Eucalyptus
Soil as a Treatment
Site Characteristics
Characteristic AcceptabilityPoor Fair Best
Depth <20” 20-40” >40”Slope (%) >8 3-8 <3Texture clay sand loamEC (dS/cm) >8 2-8 <2AWC (in/ft) <0.6 0.6-1.2 >1.2SAR >8 4-8 <4
Soil as a Treatment
Wastewater Loading Rates/ Tyler & Assoc.
Soil Texture Loading Rate (in/day)
Wastewater Water
Septic Sand Filter
Sand 1.3 10.0-20.0 400
Loam 0.7 2.5-5.0 20
Clay 0.3 0.8-2.4 2
Soil as a Treatment
Wastewater Infiltration
A = RestaurantB = SepticC = GrayD = Tap
Soil as a Treatment
Wastewater Composition/ Metcalf & Eddy
Contaminant Unit Weak Medium StrongTDS mg/L 250 500 850TOC “ 80 160 290BOD5 “ 110 220 400Nitrogen “ 20 40 85CaCO3 “ 50 100 200Coliforms #/100ml <107 <108 <109
Soil as a Treatment
Survival of Human Parasites
Parasite Time to Kill 90%
Protozoans 2-10 days
Viruses 6 days
Ascaris worms 17 days
E. coli 30 days
Soil as a Treatment Land Application Performance
Parameter Removal Comments
BOD5 94-99% Percolate < 1 mg/L
Nitrogen 65-95% Function of crop &management
Phosphorus 75-99% Plant uptake ~ 25%
Pathogens >99% --
Organics varies Removesbiodegragables
Soil as a Treatment Wastewater Treatment OptionsSystem Advantages Disadvantages
Conventional Small landrequirementReturn clean water
ExpensiveComplicated
ConstructedWetlands
Moderate landrequirementReturn clean waterInexpensive (?)
No source of revenue
Land Application(Slow Rate)
InexpensiveSource of revenueBest of LA systems
Large land requirementNo water return to riverWinter use/storageconcern
Soil as a Treatment Wastewater Treatment OptionsSystem Construction Costs
($/1,000 gal/day)O & M Costs
($/1,000 gal/day)
Conventional $3,000 $1.00
Constructed Wetlands $700 - $3,000 “negligible”
Land Application(Slow Rate)
$1,000 $0.20[$0.05]
Wastewater Treatment Options/ PSC
Soil as a Treatment
Conceptual Mass Balance Diagram
Soil as a Treatment
Water Characteristics--OjinagaParameter Wastewater Rio Grande Well Water
EC (dS/m) 2.9 2.3 2.5
Coliforms (mpn) 105 150 --
BOD5 ~35 3 14
Nitrate N (mg/L) 0.16 0.05 1.8
Kjeldahl N (mg/L) 25 11 0
Chloride (mg/L) 220 560 191
Soil as a Treatment Species Selection--Ojinaga / 2 yrs
Salt Content (%)Species Clone Survival(%)
Height(m) Ca++ Cl-
Populus 376 88 6.4 1.30 0.29
Populus 029 67 4.8 0.99 0.52
Populus 197 24 3.9 0.90 0.53
Eucalyptus SC5 98 5.2 0.80 0.49
Eucalyptus 4019 94 5.2 0.67 0.51
Eucalyptus 4016 97 5.2 0.61 0.75
Soil as a Treatment Groundwater Quality/ OjinagaParameter Before (8/97) After (8/98)Coliforms (mpn) 0 0Kjeldahl N (mg/L) 30.91 1.5Nitrate N (mg/L) 0.4 0.2EC (dS/cm) 3.5 3.9 (+12%)
TSS (mg/L) 18,1381 266Chloride (mg/L) 292 339 (+16%)
Land Application System/West Mesa
Pipes
H20
H20Wastewater(H20, OM, N, Salts)
N,P,Ca,Mg,K
N2
Soil Matrix/PrecipitantP,Ca,Mg
PCa
Mg Cl Na
Cl Cl
Cl
PP
P
Na
NaNaCa
Ca
Ca
Mg
Mg
MgMg
Mg
P
PP
Cl Cl
Cl
Cl
Caliche
CO2
Soil as a Treatment
Limitations of SRLA System
• Percolate < 10 mg NO3- -N
• Balance water- vs N-loading
• Salt loading limits plant productivity
• Growing season limits water use
Soil as a Treatment
Conclusions
• A functioning soil-plant ecosystem is an effective wastewater treatment and water reuse system.
• Arid environments create unique situations that preclude ‘off-the-shelf’ adoption.
• SRLA systems can be economical, sustainable treatment systems.