situation analysis on the water quality of ha long bay a social study from tourism businesses ’...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Situation Analysis on the Water Quality of Ha Long Bay
A social study from tourism businesses ’ perspectives
Le Tuan Anh PhD.
2
Agenda
• Overview of Ha Long Bay• Research Objectives• Methods• Findings• Recommendations• Questions & Answers
3
Overview of Ha Long Bay
• Dual role as a tourist destination and an industrial and shipping centre
• Over development of tourism
• Limited authority and decision making power
-> water contamination, solid waste accumulation, and large-scale damage to both species and ecosystems.
-> ‘Save the Bay program’
4
Research Objectives
• Relevance of program objectives• Situation analysis on water quality with focus
on impacts from tourism• Public Private relationship and willingness• Recommendations for project interventions
(2015-2017)
5
Methods
• Qualitative approach– Review of relevant projects, plans and reports
– Interviews relevant stakeholders
• Quantitative approach– Survey of 4 tourism supplier groups of 208
• 29 cruise managers
• 114 captains
• 49 accommodation managers, and
• 16 restaurant managers
6
Qualitative Findings
• Improvement on environment quality (IUCN 2013)
• 2013: 2.55 million tourists (35% domestic, 65% international) (HLBM report, 2014)
• Revenue from entrance tickets of about US$10 millions
• Environment quality is crucial factors (ERST, 2014)
• Master plan in tourism to 2020 with vision 2030
• Master plan in environment -> Europe water quality standard by 2020
• Quarterly water quality monitoring
• Local authority support to protect environment
7
Qualitative Findings
• Over carrying capacity e.g. 5,500/day at Thien Cung and Dau Go (HLBM, 2009)
• Increasing negative environmental impacts on coastal area and on the bay (JICA, 2013)
• Tourist discharges about 0.5 kg of solid waste and 100 liters of wastewater per trip (JICA, 2013)
• Boats increased 1.6 time from 329 (2006) to 527 (2014); 30% (167 overnight boats)
• Tourism pressure as a major factor affecting the universal value of the site in addition to industrial development, population growth, aquaculture and fishing (IUCN, 2013)
8
Qualitative Findings
• Ha Long Bay rated lowest on the criteria of environmental friendly destination (M=4.4) and on overall evaluation (M=4.8) among 5 destinations (Sa Pa, Ha Long, Hue, Da Nang and Hoi An) (ESRT, 2014)
• 17% of international and 15% of national showed their serious concern about the environment in the destinations of Ha Long
• Of the total 2,373 reviews of Ha Long Bay as an attraction from Jan 01 to July 16, 2014, a total of 51 (2.15%) reviews classified the attraction as ‘terrible’ while 80 (3.37%) classified their experience as ‘poor’. (Tripadvisor 2014)
9
Qualitative Findings
• Sources of pollution mainly from coastal areas and buffer zone e.g. state- owned enterprises and socio-economic organizations
• Low local awareness on environment protection
• Ha Long waste treatment capacity does not meet the growth -> discharge in to the sea
• Sewage discharge into the sea without treatment
• No collection points and treatment of sewage and black water
• Oil pollution at Bai Chay harbor (0.23mg/l in 4/2013) (HLBM 2013)
10
Quantitative findings
• General information• Perception on water quality• Environmental impacts• Public private relationship
11
General information
• Expected guests in 2015 vs. 2014: Increase
• Average guest night: cruise/hotel (1.36/1.34)
• Average occupancy rate: cruise/hotel (66%/ 44%)
• Main markets: Europe, NEA, SEA and Domestic
12
Perception on water quality
• Impression of the water quality over the past 5 years
• Observation of current water quality
• Describe the physical evidence
• The most polluted areas (on map)
• Main sources of pollutions
• Influence of water quality on tourist experience
• Responsibility on water quality protection
• Involvement in environmental protection initiative
13
Much im-
proved
Improved Unchanged Worse Much worse0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
45.0%
10.6%
40.4%
18.3%
24.0%
6.7%
Heavily polluted Some pollution Good Very good0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
5.8%
63.0%
30.8%
0.5%
Impression of the water quality over the past 5 years
Observation of current water quality
14
Impression of the water quality over the past 5 years
Observation of current water quality
Heavily polluted Some pollution Good Very good0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Owner CaptainAccomodation Restaurant
Much im-
proved
Improved Unchanged Worse Much worse0%5%
10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50%
Owner CaptainAccomodation Restaurant
15
Change of color Dead fish Rubbish floating Unpleasant smell0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
33.7%
5.3%
63.5%
14.4%
Physial evidence
Owner Captain Accomodation Restaurant0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
62%68%
61%
44%
Change of color Dead fish Rubbish floating Unpleasant smell
16
Polluted areas
21% Bai Chay coastal area
14% Bai Chay habour
7% Thien Cung - Dau Go caves
7% Amazing cave
5% Three caves
5% Fishing village
4% Titop3% Luon cave
2% Cai Lan Industrial Area
2% Doan habour
30% Other areas
17
Main sources of pollutions
Coal mining
Fishing a
ctiviti
es
Commercial
ship ro
ute
Hotels a
nd resta
urants
on shore
Residen
ts on floati
ng villa
ges
Residen
ts on sh
ore
Touris
t acti
vities
on islan
ds/cav
es
Touris
t boats
/cruise
Other0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
38%
13%
23%
27%
43%
27%
35%
22%
10%
18
Main sources of pollutions
Coal mining
Fishing a
ctiviti
es
Commercial
ship ro
ute
Hotels a
nd resta
urants
on shore
Residen
ts on floati
ng villa
ges
Residen
ts on sh
ore
Touris
t acti
vities
on islan
ds/cav
es
Touris
t boats
/cruise
Other0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Owner Captain Accomodation Restaurant
19
Water quality and tourist experience
All
Owner
Captain
Accomodation
Restaurant
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
Not important Neutral Important Very important
20
Responsibility on water quality protection
Boat owners Hotels and restaurants on
shore
Provincial and local authorities
Residents in floating villages
Tourists Other (everyone)0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
AllOwnerCaptainAccomodationRestaurant
21
Involvement in environmental protection
• Participate JICA project
• Environment monitoring
• Collect rubbish with tourists
• For a green Ha Long
• Installed oil separator
• Awareness raising
• Water saving in hotel
• Waste collection at coastal swimming area
• Etc…
N= 94
Yes; 61%
No; 39%
Owner Accomodation Restaurant0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
NoYes
22
Environmental Impacts(114 Cruise Boat Captains)
• Average volume of solid waste produced per night
• Measures use to reduce solid waste production
• Average water consumption per night
• Usage of water saving devices/ practices
• Average oiled water production per night
• Management of oily water
• Installed oily water separator and its functioning
• Average sewage production per day-only trip
• Management of sewage
• Management of grey water
23
Solid waste production and reduction
• Average volume of 11.3 kg of solid waste produced per night
• Measures use to reduce solid waste production
Waste segregation bins
Replacing individual with bulk dispensers
Replacing single with multiple-use bottles
Recycling paper, cooking oil, etc.
Selling or donating left-over food
Other
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
24
Water consumption and reduction
• Average water consumption of 6.4 m3 per night
• Usage of water saving devices/ practices
Auto detect in sinks/urinals
Double flush toilets
Linen and towel re-use cards
Flow restrictors in showers
Low flow taps in sinks
Waterless urinals
Other
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%
25
Oiled water production and management
• Average oiled water production of 1.05 m3per trip
• 100% installed oily water separator (82%/18%)
• Installed oily water separator and its functioning
75%
3%
19%
4%
Oil separation and discharge into the BayDump into the Bay without treatmentCarry back to shore Other
34%
48%
18%
Very effectively EffectivelyNot effectivelyDo not use
26
Sewage production and management
• Average sewage production of 12.2 m3 per day-only trip
• Management of sewage
77%
3%
20%
Separation and discharge into the BayDump into the Bay without treatmentCarry back to shore Other
27
Management of grey water
9%
79%
11%
2%
Dump into the Bay
Processed and dump into the Bay
Carry back to shore
Other
28
Public Private Relationship (Cruise, Accommodations, Restaurant)
• Current relationship• Willingness to engage in the Alliance• Factors hindering involvement in the Alliance• Contribution toward water quality
improvement
29
Current relationship
• Together with enterprises (2014)
• Monthly and quarterly Public Private Dialogues
• Limited participation from tourism sector
• Empowered tourism association
10%
49%
38%
2% 1%
ExcellentGoodNeutralBadTerrible
Excellent
Good
Neutral
Bad
Terrible
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
RestaurantAccomodationOwner
30
Willingness to engage in the Alliance
Highly likely Somewhat likely Indifferent Unlikely Very unlikely0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
All Owner Accomodation Restaurant
31
Possible hindering factors
Investment Negative experiences Resources Time Unwilling to collaborate Other0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
All Owner Accomodation Restaurant
32
Contribution toward water quality improvement
Certification program
Donation in EP fund
Encouragement of employees
Other
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%100%
Certification program
Donation in EP fund
Encouragement of employees
Other
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Restaurant Accomodation Owner
33
Suggestions
• A Ha Long – Cat Ba Alliance as an advisory board for Ha Long/Quang Ninh authority
• Public awareness raising program through engagement of media
• Environment protection fee/fund• Synergy/facilitation of joint activities • Pilot public-private initiatives/activities