sikhs under british rule (1849-1947) - infrared...

CHAPTER IX

SIKHS UNDER BRITISH RULE (1849-1947)

Sikhs Pacified by the British 1850-1872After the annexation of the Sikh empire, the British demobilized the Sikh army byputting over eight thousand Sikhs in jails in the very first year. Most of the Sikh fortswere demolished. Sikhs were disarmed and over forty thousand Sikh soldiers weredismissed who went back to their homes to take up the traditional occupation ofagriculture, but some of the best Sikh forces were retained in service. A Punjab forcewas set up consisting exclusively of Sikhs, particularly Sikh jats excluding the weakersections so as to divide the Sikhs. The Jagirs of the Sikh chiefs who had not participatedin the Sikh wars against the British were confirmed so as to create a loyal Sikh sectiontowards the British and intensify the divide between the Sikhs, while the jagirs of thehostile Sikh chiefs were confiscated or reduced. Some prominent Sikh warriors weresent out of Punjab to face sedition trials. At the same time the British took steps topacify the Sikhs generally. The British Governor General Lord Dalhousie recorded in1849 to warn the British government :

"Hatred of Sikhs against the Britishers exceeds the national and religious animosity of Sikhs againstAfghans."

The British took the Sikhs as a wounded lion and knew that a wounded lion isvery dangerous. They were also in the know about the ups and downs in Sikh historyin the struggle against the Mughals and Afghans. National re-unification andreorganization of the Sikhs in order to challenge British rule in the near future wasa fear uppermost in the minds of the British. They could also predict that if the Sikhscame into direct conflict with them again, their stay in India may not be prolonged.They knew that they could take over the Sikh state only with the help of conspiraciesand betrayals by insincere elements in the Sikh state. So the British planned to pacifythe Sikhs and heal their wounds by honouring their religious feelings, their vocations,their life and sense of dignity.

The British were in a difficult situation as to how to deal with the Sikhs. Oneview was to have a hostile attitude towards the Sikhs by setting up army rule in Punjab

PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com

http://www.pdffactory.com


344 Religion and History of the Sikhs

and not allowing them to reunite and have the management of the Sikh gurdwarasunder their control through the Mahants who were ever ready to play into their handsto make their offices hereditary. The other view was against such a hostile attitudeand rather to set up a civil administration in Punjab, not to interfere in Sikh religiousaffairs and rather to pacify the Sikhs and help them to settle in vocations of their choicewhich were mostly army and agriculture. But on the other hand the Punjab Governorwrote to the Viceroy of India on August 8, 1881 to keep the managements of Sikhgurdwaras under their control :

"I think it would be politically dangerous to allow the management of Sikh temples to fall into thehands of committee emancipated from government control and I trust your Excellency will assistto pass such an order in the case as will enable to continue the system which has worked outsuccessfully for more than thirty years."

It predicts the thinking of the first category views that they had been consistentlyusing a hostile attitude in trying to deal with the Sikhs. The British government tooka half way course and put it into practice from the very beginning. Neither was theretotal army rule nor total civil rule; they encouraged Sikh adversaries including theMahants against the Sikhs, but if the Sikhs display determination to come into conflictwith the British, then they were to yield so as not to be in direct confrontation withthe Sikhs.

The British appointed a board to look into the administration of Punjab at thevery start. It consisted of Henry Lawrence (army and political), his brother JohnLawrence (Revenue) and Charles Manson (Law and Justice), Henry was a knownopponent of British machinations and bitter over the way the Punjab and the Sikhstate had been annexed on the false pretext of a local rebellion and had even sentin his resignation over this matter which had not been accepted by the GovernorGeneral and he was rather made the President of the Board. The Sikhs had an affinitytowards him for having resisted the annexation of the Sikh state. Also he had prevailedover the commander in chief of the British army Charles Napier who wanted militarydictatorship in Punjab and instead he got civilian rule established. Sikhs were recruitedinto the Army by amending the rules; so they could not only remain baptized Sikhsbut also it was ensured that Sikh soldiers must retain the Sikh code of conduct. Largetracts of lands with irrigation facilities were made available to Sikhs to keep thembusy in Agriculture.

To honour Sikh religious sentiments and to satisfy the martial spirit of the Sikhsas to their avocation of army service, the British government made amendments inthe rules of recruitment to the army, making baptised Sikhs, observing the Sikh codeof conduct, and possessing the five Sikh emblems to be eligible to join the army. Theregulations and rules provided :

"The pool of religious pledges of Sikh fraternity should on no account be interfered with. The Sikh




345Sikhs under British Rule (1849-1947)

should be permitted to wear his beard and the hair of his head gathered up as enjoined by hisreligion. Any invasion however slight of these obligations would be construed into a desire to subverthis faith, lead to evil consequences and naturally inspire general distrust and alarm. Even thosewho have assumed the outward conventional characteristics of Sikhs should not be permitted afterentering the British army to drop them."

(SC 38 of 28.2.1951)

The Governor General, Lord Dalhousie gave his consent to these regulations andremarked :

"Soon after I entered Punjab during the present march, I heard that Sikhs had been enlisted butthat in compliance I presume with existing regulations they had been required to cut their beards-an act to which no real Sikh can submit, or if he for a time submits to it for necessity, it is impossiblethat he can do so without the deepest discontent. No true Sikh will submit to it and the intelligencethat such a regulation is enforced rapidly spreading among other Sikh corps in the service mayproduce alarm or at least restlessness which is much to be deprecated. This point therefore shouldat once be set at rest."

(SC 39 of 28.2.1951)

It was recorded by the British in the very next year :

"Sikh soldiers proved their fighting quality and loyalty in the Anglo-Burmese war of 1852 and twoyears later against the nomad tribe on the North West frontier."

(Baird, Private Letters of Marquess of Dalhousie, pp. 200, 321)

In the mutiny of 1857 the British realized that it was the Sikh soldiers who playedsuch a great role in curbing the mutiny. The Sikhs were acknowledged for their braverole in suppressing the mutiny. It was recorded in the secret correspondence of theBritish :

"The Sikhs were raised at a most crucial season, when other recruiting grounds were in the handsof the mutineers or in a state of rebellion. They were called on to save the empire and have fulfilledtheir mission and we all owe our wamest thanks to that bold and sagacious policy which calledthem into the field and which I am sure will also devise means for keeping them under commandfor future."

(SC 2 of 29.10.1958)

Ultimately the Sikhs formed over thirty percent of the Indian army in British India,though their population was less than two percent. The Sikhs accomplished so muchfeats of bravery and commitment that they made a name for themselves for theircourage; on the battlefield during the World Wars to achieve victories, whilemaintaining their moral ethics. The British set up separate Sikh Batallions withGurdwaras in all the cantonments and ensured their observance of the Sikh code ofconduct. The turbaned Sikh soldiers and officers in their distinct Sikh appearance andidentity could be visible from far off. The British were thus successful in avoiding





conflict with the Sikhs by allowing the Sikhs to take up vocations of their choice namelythe army, and giving due regards to their religious sentiments and dignity. In fact theSikhs were in no mood to be in armed conflict with British due to the intense rivalriesof the sons of Maharaja Ranjit Singh, of all the Sikh chiefs, and the betrayals of Sikhcommanders and ministers in conspiracy with British officers to defeat Sikh army.

The Britishers took all pains to satisfy the Sikhs as to their main vocation ofagriculture. Canals were constructed to take the river waters to the lands mostlyoccupied by the Sikhs to advance the prospects of agriculture. The desert lands tothe west of Punjab were made cultivable by being irrigated by canals and were allottedto Sikhs residing in eastern Punjab on nominal prices so as to keep them busy andoccupied and content in their agricultural vocation. The Sikhs particularly the Sikhjats who were involved in agriculture were made the owners of big tracts of land withthe facility of irrigation from canal waters. The area specifically selected for Sikhs washuge and vast tract of land known as 'Nilibar' irrigated by the Chenab Canal. The Sikhfarmers from the districts of Amritsar, Ludhiana, Ferozepur and adjoining areas weregiven these lands, giving them a sense of becoming big farm owners. The small landholders were allotted 14 to 16 acres of land, without any payment. The middle landholders were allotted 100 to 150 acres of land at the nominal price of less than tenper acre. The big land holders were allotted 150 to 500 acres of land at a price ofless than twenty rupees per acre. The Sikh farmers known for their sense of hard labourmade their farms cultivable, capable of producing surplus agricultural produce. TheSikhs thus became the most prosperous peasantry of India, most of them were jat Sikhs.

The canals constructed were Upper Bari Doab, from river Ravi and lower BariDoab as well from that River; the upper Chenab canal from Chenab river. The ShahpurThal desert was irrigated by the canals taken from river Jhelum in upper Jhelum canal.These irrigation projects covered entire lands which were previously deserts and madethem fit for agriculture from the Chenab river, 427 miles of Canal were taken and2280 miles of distributor channels, while 12,000 miles of the water course were taken.These channels irrigated 2.25 million acres of land. It was at the cost of twenty sixmillion rupees, the yearly value of the crop yielded over seventy-eight million rupeeswhich was earned mostly by the Sikh farmers. The prosperity of Sikhs and otherPunjabis is well exhibited by the report of the financial commissioner of Punjab :

"Cultivation has now become more careful, comfortable and commodious houses have been built.All villages have now a good well, many of these have a mosque or a dharamsala and a rest house;the growth of good shading trees is remarkable both in the villages and fields. Many villages area pattern of cleanliness and comfort and the people evidently take pride in them and their imposinghouses of brick and mortar. There are of course, some exceptions among 1,00,000 colonies, butthe general impression is one of good prosperity, comfort and content from which a feeling ofgratitude to Government for the extraordinary benefits, its colonization scheme has conferred onthese fortunate individuals in the short space of fifteen years is not absent."

(Civil and Military Gazette, May 26, 1909)





The first attempt to erect a cotton mill in the Punjab was made in March 1883when citizens of Lahore met under the chairmanship of Raja Harbans Singh to considerthe matter. (Reported in The Tribune, March 18, 1883)

It shows that in addition to the development of lands for agriculture, cotton millswere also being set up. Posts for Sikhs were reserved in the Army and in the civilservices as well to be filled exclusively by baptized Sikhs, the Khalsa. It was also astep to recognize Sikh religious sentiments and to keep the Sikhs satisfied, by theBritish government. Such steps taken by the British government resulted in the increaseof Sikhs substantially. The Sikh jats had now become superior to the Brahmins andother castes, because of their being the land owners of the entire village lands andthus being more prosperous. Now others had become dependant upon them, whenpreviously Brahmins were considered to be superior. There was no thought of conflictbetween Sikhs and the Britishers; instead their co-operation increased. The British withtheir experience and tactics won over the minds of the Sikhs tactfully.

The British also paid attention to the construction of roads in Punjab to satisfythe people that they were interested and were committed to the overall developmentof the state. The G.T. road from Peshawar to Delhi was reopened and hundreds ofbridges on it were repaired. In the administration report of 1850 and 1851, of twoyears after the annexation of Punjab, it was stated in para 346 :

"1349 miles of roads have been cleared and constructed while 853 miles are under construction;2487 miles have been traced and 5272 miles surveyed, all exclusively of minor cross and branchroads."

The British administration provided a more systematic and accountable civiladministration. Punjab was divided into 7 divisions or commissionerships which wasfurther divided into districts (of which there were 25 in the province) a five tieredadministration was set up. Next to the board were the commissioners of the sevendivisions. Below the commissioners were the Deputy and Assistant Commissioners andbelow them extra Assistant Commissioner, a cadre specially constituted to provide jobsfor such natives as might have filled offices of trust under the Darbar. The lowest gradeof gazetted officers was the tehsildar whose civil powers extended to deciding casesup to the value of Rupees 300.

For internal security, ten regiments – five cavalry and fifty infantry, were raised.Some of the Darbar's soldiers were absorbed in these regiments. A military police forceconsisting of 8000 men, largely Punjabi Mussalmans, was raised. The foot constabularywas meant to guard treasuries and goals, the mounted police to petrol highways. Asecret intelligence services (Khufia) police comprised of informers and detectives(Jasus) was attached to the police to keep the government in touch with the politicaltemper of the people. Village watchmen-Chaunkidars continued to be employed bythe villagers but were expected to keep the police informed of the movements ofstrangers.

(Khushwant Singh, History of Sikhs, Vol. II, p. 90)





Time for Sikh AwakeningBritish government continued taking a keen interest in Sikh affairs. In 1859 it

drafted the rules and regulations for the administration of Harimandar Sahib knownas 'Dastur-al-Amal' whereby a manager was to be appointed who was to be guidedby a council of nine baptized Sikhs. The sole proprietorship of all Gurdwaras was tobe in the Guru, while the claim to management was to vest in Sikh Panth. But theauthority of the Government to appoint a manager could never be acceptable to theSikhs. For some time, the Government appointed the managers of its choice, to beexploited to its advantage but ultimately yielded to the Sikhs and Harimandar Sahibcame in to the exclusive management of the Sikhs. Similarly the British administration,initially helped the Mahants to keep them under its obligation, but yielded to the Sikhswhen they exhibited their determination to oust them at any cost, thus to avoidconfrontation with the Sikhs, and ultimately enacting the Sikh Gurdwaras Act 1925to vest the management of Sikh Gurdwaras with the Sikhs directly. Time for Sikhawakening to its real tenets had now arrived.

The Mahants and managers of Sikh historical Gurdwaras had become so anti-Sikh under the patronage of the British administration and Brahmanical agents thatthey even dared to issue a Hukamnama, from Takhat Hazur Sahib, Nanded that Sikhsshould not give co-operation to the Singh Sabha movement. This was done on thepretext that the Singh Sabha was baptizing muslims of lower castes and women. Eventhough Hukamnama from Akal Takhat had already been issued in 1879 that Sikhsshould join the Singh Sabha movement which was aimed at bringing the desiredreformation and restoration to the original form of Sikhism. There can be no objectionto the baptizing of any person who is willing to join the Sikh religion, irrespectiveof the religion, caste or sex one belongs to.

On March 18, 1887 a Hukamnama was also issued from Akal Takhat, Amritsaragainst Prof. Gurmukh Singh, the main spirit behind Lahore Singh Sabha for gettingbaptized the muslims and low castes in Singh Sabha Gurdwaras in violation of thebasic thought of Sikh religion and the earlier Hukamnama of Akal Takhat. Such antiSikh actions were obviously beyond the toleration of Sikhs.

Activism of Anti-Sikh ElementsBrahmanical cult was anti-Sikh from the very start, as they had a fear psychosis

as to the danger to their false sense of superiority and exploitation of the innocentmasses by the Divine teachings of Sikh Religion. They were thus interested inintroducing the same Hindu myths, superstitions, gods and incarnations into the Sikhreligion which had all been rejected by the Sikh Gurus. Most of the converts to theSikh religion were from Hinduism. Arya Samaj and other fundamentalist Hindu groupswere also active in misrepresenting Sikh religion to be a part of Hinduism and theSikhs to be a sect of the Hindus. Swami Daya Nand, Arya Samaj leader, came to Punjab





to propagate it and attracted some Sikh leaders with his novel plan that Arya Samaj,like the Sikhs also condemned Idol-worship, caste and creed distinctions andBrahmincal domination. But he was committed to Vedantic ideology and its superioritygiving a secondary place to the Guru Granth Sahib and had even made adverse remarksagainst the Sikh Gurus. So all the Sikhs turned against him. He had to leave Punjabwithout fulfilling his mission. Some Sikh scholars negated the propaganda that theSikhs were a sect of the Hindus. Kahan Singh Nabha wrote a book — Hum Hindu Nahin"Hum (Sikhs) are not Hindus". So this propaganda proved counter productive.

Nirankaris, Radhaswamis and Namdharis were some other groups whose headswere called as 'Satguru' with false notions though they mostly referred to the Sikhscriptures and their divine teachings to be supreme. But in Sikhism there can be norecognition to such Gurus wherein only the ten Sikh Gurus and the Guru Granth Sahibare the only Gurus. They caused some confusion in a few Sikhs initially but the Sikhsultimately rejected them as non-Sikh groups, as in Sikh religion no one is permittedto call himself as Guru and there can be no scope for any such groups. The governmentagencies tried to exploit them to mislead the Sikhs but the Sikhs faced the challengewith determination to successfully reject such groups to be a part of Sikhism. BabaRam Singh was misrepresented to be the Namdhari Guru, though throughout his life,he remained a devoted and humble Sikh following the Sikh code of conduct strictlyand preaching the Guru Granth Sahib to be the perpetual Sikh Guru, while attemptingto regain Sikh rule. The anti Sikh forces were behind these groups to provide themall the hidden support to misrepresent Sikhs and Sikh religion. The Sikhs thus hadto face this challenge and which they did.

Sikhs also had to face another challenge from Christian Missionaries who hadbecome active in Punjab after its annexation by the British, and had the governmentpatronage. They started their missionary schools in which prayers were held in thename of Jesus Christ and the preaching of Christianity was imparted to students. Theirmodus operandi was to lure the people with financial assistance and to serve mankindwith the aim of conversions to their religion. Their first encounter with the Sikhs tookplace at Amritsar where they persuaded four Sikh students to embrace Christianity.This was exposed with the timely action of the Sikhs and the missionaries could notsucceed. The Christian Missionaries got the message that they would not be permittedto operate within the Sikh populace; with no objection to their missionary spirit toserve mankind. They abandoned their plans of conversions as far as the Sikhs wereconcerned, realizing the determination and devotion of the Sikhs towards theirreligion. The British government had already decided not to interfere in the religiousaffairs of the Sikhs in order to avoid direct confrontation with them. It had amendedthe army rules to allow baptized Sikhs as they had felt the commitment of Sikhs totheir code of conduct.

A confidential report on the development in Sikh politics (1900-1911) by D.Setrie, Assistant Director Criminal Intelligence, government of India dated 11 August,





1911 (National Archives Delhi) depicts the hostility of the Brahmanical cult andfundamentalist Hindus against Sikhs :

"Hinduism has always been hostile to Sikhism whose Gurus peacefully and successfully attackedthe principles of caste which is the foundation on which the whole fabric of Brahmanism has beenreared. The activities of Hindus have therefore been constantly directed to the undermining ofSikhism; both by preventing the children of Sikh fathers from taking Pahul and by reducing theprofessed Sikhs from their allegiance to their faith. Hinduism has strangled Budhism, once aformidable rival to it and it has already made serious in-roads into the domain of Sikhism."

Sikhs were thus to face this challenge.

Singh Sabha Movement (1873 to 1920)— Sikh AwarenessIn 1873 AD, the Sikhs started a movement for Sikh education and Sikh religious

reforms known as "Singh Sabha movement". It was to preach the real tenets, thedoctrines and the principles and religious practices of the Sikh religion to be strictlyfollowed by the Sikhs. It was to curtail Brahmanical infiltration in Sikh religious placesand the spread of Christianity among Sikhs besides setting up of educationalinstitutions, Sikh schools and colleges for Sikh students for their general studies aswell as to enable them to live the Sikh way of life. It was also to set up Sikh newspapersand journals which would give the Sikh point of view against the misrepresentationspropagated against Sikh religion. It was also done to set up Gurdwaras and to takepractical steps to educate and awaken the Sikhs towards correct perspectives. TheSikhs having been peacefully settled in their respective vocations, found the time togive attention to these matters. Even during Sikh rule no such steps could be takenin these matters as the Sikhs remained occupied with the conflicts and battles toestablish the Sikh Empire.

Singh Sabha Gurdwaras were set up throughout Punjab, which was the need ofthe day. Effective steps were taken to set up Sikh schools and colleges in which theteachings of Sikh religion were to be imparted to the students from the very beginningin their childhood. The first Khalsa High school was set up at Gujranwala in 1889and thereafter Khalsa schools were set up in every important town. Guru Nanak KhalsaCollege was set up and the foundation stone of it was laid down by Sant Attar Singhwho took keen interest in Sikh educational institutions at Mastuana. Later on, a veryprestigious Khalsa College was set up at Amritsar in 1892 and likewise, many moreinstitutions also at other places. Sant Teja Singh also did a lot in the field of Sikheducation. He himself had achieved distinctions at Oxford University London, and atHarvard University in America.

Effective steps were taken by the Sikhs to promote the Punjabi language ingurmukhi, was published in 1854. The Punjabi Printing Press was set up for the





publication of Sikh literature, journals and newspapers. In 1880 gurmukhi Akhar andvidyak Punjabi were started, while in 1885, Khalsa Akhar, in 1886 Rasala Sadharakand Khalsa Gazette were added. In 1884, Khalsa Tract Society was set up at Amritsarunder the driving force of Bhai Kaur Singh and Bhai Vir Singh to preach Sikh religion.The famous tract of Bhai Kahn Singh Nabha, the eminent Sikh scholar, Ham HinduNahin was published in 1899. Giani Ditt Singh and other Sikh scholars silenced theArya Samajists and the Brahmanical cult bringing forth a separate Sikh identity basedon the correct analysis of the distinctive features of Sikh religion as separate andindependent revealed religion and not a part of Hinduism.

Khalsa DiwansIn 1883 Khalsa Diwan was formed with the aim to educate the Sikh youth as

to the Sikh way of life and the Sikh code of conduct to be strictly observed by theSikhs and to organize the Sikh educational institutions. Three types of Sikh leaderscame to the fore. First were the hawks led by persons like Thakur Singh Sandhawalia,who were opposed to any co-operator with the British government, second were themoderates led by Kanwar Bikramjit Singh Kapurthala and Bhai Gurumukh Singh whowere in favour of cooperation with the British government and third were the Bedisand Sodhis led by Baba Khem Singh Bedi who were desirous of their own superiority,because they belonged to the same clan as the Sikh Gurus.

Due to the difference of ideologies of the leaders of the Khalsa Diwan, two KhalsaDiwans were formed. One was called Khalsa Diwan, Amritsar while the other as KhalsaDiwan Lahore. They operated in their own ways but their aims were the same toeducate the Sikh masses and to awaken them to the reality of the Sikh religion.

In 1902, the chief Khalsa Diwan was formed to accommodate all the Sikh leadersand coordinate their activities. Its founder President was Arjan Singh Bagarianwala;while its secretary was Sunder Singh Majithia. The Chief Khalsa Diwan attended tothe plans for Sikh educational schemes methodically. The annual educationalconferences were also organized. It laid the foundation for Khalsa College Amritsarin 1890 on a vast tract of land with a magnificent architectural construction. OtherSikh colleges and schools were also set up by it.

In 1918 Sikh education committee was formed by the Chief Khalsa Diwan toeffectively deal with the Sikh educational affairs. It certainly goes to the credit of theSingh Sabha movement of the Sikh organizations which made the Sikhs conscious asto their education and religion and not to be misled by their adversaries.

In 1905, Sikhs got the idols from the Parkarma of Harimandar Sahib removed.These had been placed by the Mahants under the instigation of the Brahmanical agentsthough idol worship was totally prohibited in the Sikh religion. Anti Sikh activitiesin Gurdwaras were exposed and would no more be tolerated. The Sikhs gave clearmessage to the Mahants that henceforth Gurdwaras would function strictly inaccordance with the Sikh religious doctrines and practices.





Separate Sikh Identity RecognitionsIn 1909, Anand Marriage Act 1909 was enacted to legalise the Sikh marriage

conducted by Anand Karaj ceremony which Sikhs used to perform from the days ofthe Sikh Gurus but had no legal sanction. This act acknowleged the separate Sikhidentity and personal law. Hindu personal laws were not applicable to Sikhs as notbeing a part of Hinduism. In October 1908, Tikka Ripudaman Singh of Nabha hadintroduced the Anand Karaj bill in the legislative council which was passed in 1909and became law.

In 1914, Khalsa Gurdwara Committee Delhi was formed which took over themanagement of Delhi Gurdwaras under its control.

In 1914, wearing of kirpan was allowed to Sikhs in Punjab; it being one of theSikh articles of faith by exempting it from the perview of Arms Act. In 1917, kirpanwas allowed by the government of India to Sikhs throughout India. In 1920, wearingof kirpan was allowed to Sikh army perssonnels.

To establish the separate Sikh identity, King Abdur Rehman of Afghanistan issuedthe order in 1905 against Hindus prohibiting the keeping of idols in Gurdwara at Kabulholding that Guru Nanak was against idol worship and the Hindus had no connectionwith Sikh gurdwaras, as Sikhs were not concerned with Hindu temples.

Separate representation of Sikhs concededIn 1918, the British government accepted the Sikh demand of separate

representation in the 'Montague Chemsford report' on Indian constitutional reformsconceding the separate identity of Sikhs, being not part of Hindus.

Gurdwara Rakab Ganj wall reconstructed by Government (1920)In 1911, capital of India had shifted to Delhi from Calcutta. In 1912, the British

government purchased portion of land of Gurdwara Rakab Ganj for building theresidence of the Viceroy of Delhi, which adjoins the building of Indian Parliament.In 1914, some portion of the outer wall of that gurdwara was demolished by theagitation against it. In 1920, the government of India yielded to the Sikhs andreconstructed the wall and did not touch it again ensuring that no such encroachmenton Sikh religious land would ever be made by the government. The Gurdwara landis still under occupation of the Gurdwara management.

Management of Khalsa College Amritsar given to SikhsIn November 1920, the management of Khalsa College Amritsar was handed over

to the Sikhs by the government as the Sikhs had given the ultimatum to the governmentto hand over the management of the college exclusively to Sikhs by Novermber 5,1920. Sunder Singh Majithia became the President while Harbans Singh Attari thesecretary of Khalsa college managing committee.





Misuse of Mahants as Gurdwara ManagersBritish government misused the Mahants as Gurdwara managers for its political

strategy. They were not committed to the Sikhs and were desirous of prolonging theirhold on Sikh Gurdwaras, as they could easily be made government stooges forexploitation. However, the British government yielded to the Sikhs when they realizedthe resentment of the Sikhs to such hostile activities, in order to avoid conflict withthe Sikhs.

Akal Takhat Hukamnama Against Kamagatamaru Sikhs-1915In 1915, the British government got a Hukamnama issued from Akal Takhat,

Amritsar against Baba Gurdit Singh and other Sikhs of Kamagatamaru Ship that theywere not Sikhs because of their peaceful movement to oust the British from India.This was done with the mischievious design to discourage the Sikhs from taking activepart in Indian independence movement. It was resented by the Sikhs who were ensuredthat such an act will not be repeated in future.

Saropa to General O' Dyer in Harimandar Sahib-1919In 1919, the British government got a Saropa (Robe of honour) presented to

General O' Dyer in Harimandar Sahib, who was responsible for massacring hundredsof innocent unarmed persons, most of them Sikhs on Baisakhi day of that year atJallianwala Bagh, Amritsar. The motive of this was to show that Sikhs were againstthe Indian Independence movement, though the Sikhs were already active in thatmovement. They had shown their utter resentment and decided to oust the Mahantsand such Gurdwara management, acting as stooges of government without any furtherdelay.

Sikhs Determined to oust Mahants from GurdwarasSikhs now became determined to liberate their Gurdwaras from Mahants at the

cost of any sacrifice, in order to eliminate such outside influence in Gurdwaras. TheSingh Sabha movement had awakened the Sikhs to strictly adhere to the Sikh codeof conduct and the setting of Sikh Gurdwaras and Sikh educational institutions to bemanaged directly by them with honesty of purpose. The Sikhs started a very effectivemovement for this purpose, known as 'Akali Movement'.

Akali Movement 1920-1925Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee formed - 1920

On November 15, 1920, a gathering of Sikhs took place at Akal Takhat Amritsarand decided to take over the management of all the Sikh Gurdwaras by ousting the





Mahants without any further delay. Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee(SGPC) was elected by the Sikhs themselves for the management of the Sikhgurdwaras. A committee of thirty six eminent Sikhs under the Presidentship of BhaiHarbans Attari was formed to take immediate effective steps in this respect. A generalcommittee of one hundred and seventy five Sikhs was also formed with S. SundarSingh Majithia as its Chairman. The meeting of this committee was held at Akal Takhat,Amritsar on December 12, 1920. Its office bearers were elected. Its constitution wasdrafted.

Executive Committee of SGPC Elected-1921On August 27, 1921, the meeting of the general body of SGPC was held at Akal

Takhat, Amritsar. Executive committee of thirty one Sikhs was elected out of them.Baba Kharak Singh, the veteran Sikh leader, was elected President of SGPC.

Shiromani Akali Dal formed-1920On December 14, 1920, The Sikhs formed Shiromani Akali Dal with Sarmukh

Singh Jhabal as its President to help the SGPC with the implementation of its decisions.Akali Dal became the political representative body of Sikhs, which did its work in aneffective manner. The Sikhs thus organized themselves well.

Gurdwaras were thus taken over by Sikhs under their management ousting theMahants.

Sikhs took over Sialkot Gurdwara-1920A dispute had taken place at Sialkot Gurdwara between the Sikhs and the Mahant

of that gurdwara. On October 5, 1920 a big gathering of Sikhs was held there andthey decided to occupy the Gurdwara and oust the Mahant from there. Initially theBritish administration helped the Mahant but when the Sikhs occupied the Gurdwara,the British Commissioner came there on that very evening and announced that theBritish government had no intention to interfere in the religious affairs of the Sikhsand the Sikhs may manage the Gurdwara as they desire. The Mahant ran away andthe Gurdwara came under the direct management of the Sikhs.

Harimandar Sahib and Akal Takhat taken overIn October 1920, the Sikhs held a meeting at Jallianwala Bagh, just near

Harimandar Sahib Amritsar. They decided to take over Harimandar Sahib and AkalTakhat and to oust the Mahants on that very day. Jathedar Kartar Singh Jhabbar alongwith twenty five Sikhs was deputed to take over Harimandar Sahib and Akal Takhat.The jatha of these brave Sikhs went to Harimandar Sahib and ousted the Mahantsand took over the Management of both these centres of Sikh religion.





The Deputy Commissioner of Amritsar, invited Jathedar Kartar Singh Jhabbar andsome other Sikh bodies and informed them about the orders of the Governor that asthe Sikhs have taken control of Harimandar Sahib complex, the government wouldnot interfere in the matter; it being the religious affair of the Sikhs as the governmenthas revised its policy, to now have no interest in the management of Gurdwaras. Heformally handed over the possession of the Harimandar Sahib complex to them. Itwas a great victory for the Sikhs. On the next day on October 15, 1920, it was soannounced in the congregation at Akal Takhat to call a meeting of the Sikhs to electgurdwaras management committee on November 15, 1920. Thousands of Sikhsattended the meeting wherein SGPC was established. A Hukamnama from Akal Takhatwas issued prescribing the qualification of the members of SGPC. Every member shouldbe a practising Sikh, a baptized Sikh possessing the five Sikh emblems and notcommitting any of the violations (Kuraihat) and contributing Daswandh. Such 175members were nominated.

A convention of Sikh league took place at Lahore, which was in co-operation withIndian National congress on October 19, 1920. MK Gandhi while stressing for the non-co-operation resolution against the British advised the Sikhs :

"I understand that some Sikh young men were taking possession of Gurdwaras. It was unjust toturn out Mahants by force. Rather they should do congress work."

Sikhs rejected his advice to be anti Sikh and so he could not impose his confidencein Sikhs for over a decade, though later on, he sent a telegraphic message to Sikhsthat Sikhs have won the battle against the British, bringing first victory against themin India. Dr. Kitchlu, a top congress leader contradicted Gandhi :

"The measure of success which the Hindus had achieved thus for through Congress in 35 years andthe Muslims through Muslim League in 25 years, the Khalsa ji has done in 5 months.

Sikhs were determined to oust the Mahants which they did alone, without anyoutside help within five years.

Gurdwara Tarn Taran taken over by Sikhs 1921On January 24, 1921, a congregation of Sikhs was held at Akal Takht Amritsar.

A woman stood up and narrated the misconduct of a Mahant of Gurdwara Tarn Taranthat he had misbehaved with her daughter when she had gone to visit the Gurdwara.The Sikhs got enraged and decided to oust the Mahant immediately and took overthe Gurdwara. On the next day, Jathedar Teja Singh Bhucher led the Jatha of fortySikhs to Gurdwara Tarn Taran and took over its management after a fight betweenthe Sikhs and stooges of the Mahant. Two Sikhs were killed and several injured, butthe Sikhs ousted the Mahant and took over the management of the gurdwara onJanuary 26, 1921. The Mahant ran away. A committee of 15 Sikhs was formed tomanage the gurdwara.





Gurdwara Nankana Sahib taken over–Mahant Narain Dass ousted1921

SGPC decided to oust Mahant Narain Dass from the historic Gurdwara NankanaSahib – the birth place of Guru Nanak, founder of Sikhism. The Mahant had hiredcriminals armed with fire arms and deadly weapons to guard the gurdwara andchallenged the Sikhs. On February 22, 1921, Bhai Lachhman Singh led a Jatha of 200Sikhs to liberate the gurdwara. After offering prayers, the SGPC leaders sent a messageto Bhai Lachhman Singh to wait for a day for other Sikh Jathas when they knew aboutthe hired criminals of the Mahant. But he refused to wait for a day even, as the Ardashas been performed and as such their Jatha would enter the gurdwara without anyinterruption, come what may; such was the commitment to ardas – prayer by the Sikhs.

Sikh Jatha Attacked by Hired Criminals of the MahantThe Sikh Jatha of Bhai Lachhman Singh entered Gurdwara Nankana Sahib. The

Sikhs were attacked from all the sides by the hired assassins. Bhai Lachhman Singhwas martyred when he was sitting by the Guru Granth Sahib inside the gurdwara hall.Several Sikhs were shot at and even burnt alive by spreading Kerosene oil on themfor which preparations had already been made by the Mahant. One hundred and thirtySikhs of that Jatha got martyrdom. Thousands of Sikhs reached gurdwara next daywhich had been locked by the British administration with 150 personnel of Army.

Keys of Gurdwara given to SikhsThe British administration realized determination of the Sikhs to take over the

gurdwara on that very day. Keys of the gurdwara were handed over to SGPCrepresentatives by the British administration in order to have their own managementand the Sikhs took over it by ousting the Mahant.

Mahant Narain Dass and other Culprits ArrestedThe administration arrested Mahant Narain Dass and his hired assassins. They

were prosecuted for the heinous crimes committed by them and sentenced. Some ofthem were sentenced to death, while some were imprisoned for life by the sessioncourt. The British Government gave the impression that they did not intend to interferein the religious affairs of the Sikhs and the management of their gurdwaras by themdirectly.

Gurdwara Panja Sahib Taken Over on November 18, 1920Gurdwara Panja Sahib at Hasan Abdal is a historic gurdwara in the memory of

Guru Nanak. Here the Guru humbled the arrogant Muslim faqir Wali Kandhari by





holding the rock, pushed by the faqir towards the Guru, with his hand. The rock stillcontains the impression of the hand of the great Guru and the fountain of water isstill gushing. All this came into being to provide water to Mardana when the faqirrefused water to him from his tank. That tank immediately became dry. This gurdwarawas also under the occupation of the Mahant. In accordance with the decision of SGPCJathedar Kartar Singh Jhabbar led the Sikh jatha to oust the Mahant. The Sikhs hadexhibited that they would remain peaceful to every extent and suffer the martyrdomto liberate their gurdwaras. The Sikhs had to make sacrifices and ultimately theMahant was ousted and the management of gurdwara was taken over by the Sikhs.The British administration initially helped the mahant, but yielded to the Sikhsrealizing their firm determination.

Keys of Harimandar Sahib Tosha Khana taken by SGPC 1921-22The keys of Harimandar Sahib Tosha Khana had been taken by Deputy

Commissioner, Amritsar from Sunder Singh Ramgarhia, who was in possession ofthose keys. On November 7, 1921, SGPC decided that these keys should be taken overfrom the Deputy Commissioner by Baba Kharak Singh, president SGPC. The DeputyCommissioner refused to hand over the keys. The government appointed a custodianof Harimandar Sahib and arrested the main leaders of Akali Dal and SGPC. The Sikhsstarted Morcha – agitation, against it. The government yielded to the Sikhs. On January17, 1922 Kharak Singh and all other sikh leaders were released. The keys were handedover to Baba Kharak Singh by the representative of the Deputy Commissionerpersonally in the Sikh congregation that very evening, assuring them that the Britishgovernment did not want to interfere in the management of gurdwaras by Sikhs.

Mahatma Gandhi congratulated Sikhs on this VictoryMahatma Gandhi, leader of Indian National Congress, leading the Indian

independence movement against the British, telegraphically congratulated the Sikhsover this victory stating that the first struggle of independence against the British hadbeen won over by the Sikhs.

Liberation of Gurdwara Guru Ka Bagh-1922On August 23, 1921, SGPC sent Jatha of Sikhs to liberate gurdwara Guru Ka

Bagh – a historical gurdwara in the memory of Guru Arjan Dev and Guru TegBahadur – by ousting the Mahant Sunder Dass, and it got the possession of thegurdwara from the Mahant.

Sikhs arrested on complaint of MahantThe Mahant got the Sikhs arrested from the gurdwara by filing a false complaint





of having committed theft of cutting the trees from the gurdwara land for langar. Thepolice seized the gurdwara and prohibited the langar material to reach the gurdwara.The Sikhs were also lathi charged by the police in gurdwara.

Sikhs started Morcha from Akal TakhatOn August 29, 1922, a big gathering of Sikhs was held at Akal Takhat and decided

to start a peaceful agitation Morcha against the high handedness of the police to helpthe Mahant at Guru ka Bagh. Daily Sikh jathas would go to get themselves arrested.The Sikhs remained peaceful despite the rude behaviour of the police and their useof tortures on them. They had exhibited that Sikhs could also remain peaceful andas well as defeating the armed forces with excellent heroism on the battlefield.

Government Yielded to SikhsIn that peaceful agitation, the arrest of 5605 Sikhs took place. The government

yielded to the Sikhs on November 7, 1922 and released all the arrested personsensuring that Sikhs could manage their gurdwaras as they liked.

Sikhs took over Gurdwara and ousted MahantThe gurdwara and its land was occupied by the Sikhs, bringing it under their

management. The Mahant was ousted who ran away.

Jaitu Morcha won by Sikhs 1923-24— Maharaja Ripudaman Singh of Nabha dislodgedBritish govt. dislodged Maharaja Ripudaman Singh of Nabha on July 9, 1923,

who was a supporter of the Sikh movement spreading over in those days.

Sacrilege of Guru Granth Sahib at Jaitu.On August 29, 1923, sacrilege of Guru Granth Sahib was committed by some

government officials, which infuriated the Sikhs. It was done at Jaitu, which was inthe territory of Nabha State.

Sikhs started Morcha against GovernmentThe Sikhs started the Morcha – peaceful agitation on September 14, 1923. Several

Sikhs were arrested. There was interference in the performance of Akhand Path ofthe Guru Granth Sahib by some government officials as well. SGPC decided onSeptember 15, 1923 that jathas of 25 Sikhs be daily sent to Jaitu from Akal Takhat.





Sikh Administrator ex-communicatedGurdial Singh, administrator of Nabha state was ex-communicated by Akal Takhat

from Sikh panth for sacrilege towards the Guru Granth Sahib.

Government declared SGPC and Akali Dal UnlawfulThe British government made full efforts to curb this agitation of Sikhs. It went

to the extent of declaring both the SGPC and the Akali Dal to be unlawful on October13, 1923. The leaders of these parties were arrested. Some were prosecuted andconvicted and got sentenced to death and exiled for life. This further enraged the Sikhsand made them more determined to defeat the government and support the SikhMorcha.

500 Shahidi Jatha sent from Akal TakhatOn February 9, 1924, a Jatha of 500 Sikhs, called the Shahidi jatha of 'martyrs'

was sent from Akal Takhat with the direction that every Sikh would remain peacefulinspite of government provocations and high handedness. Ten thousand Sikhs morejoined this jatha at Bargari near Jaitu. Dr. Kitchlu and Gidwani, the leaders of IndianNational Congress and Mr. Jimand of the New Times of America also accompanied theSikh Jatha, which proceeded to gurdwara Tibbi Sahib, Jaitu reciting the Divine hymnsof the Guru Granth Sahib.

Government announced prohibitory orders; used Machine gunsThe Jatha reached the gurdwara outside the precincts of Jaitu. The British

administrator of Nabha announced the prohibitory orders, not to proceed further. Thepolice fired machine gun shots, whereby several members of the jatha were injuredand killed, but despite this, the Sikhs did not stop and reached gurdwara Tibbi Sahib.Twelve Sikhs were killed while fifty got injured in the police firing. Several Sikhs werearrested and prosecuted but Sikhs could not be terrified. Government failed to stopthe Sikhs from reaching the gurdwara, in spite of all its excesses.

The Jathas kept coming to Jaitu continuously. In spite of all the atrocities andthreats of the Government sixteen such jathas continuously reached Jaitu. The Morchawas so spread over that even the shahidi Sikh jathas came to Jaitu from outside Punjaband even from overseas like Canada, Hong-Kong and other countries. It had becomea point of prestige for the Sikhs to defeat the British Government so that it may notthink of coming into conflict with Sikhs again. No Sikh arrested could be persuadedby the government to surrender in spite of its efforts in that regard. More than 200Sikhs died in jails and hundreds suffered the tortures and died in jails. But the Sikhsremained in high spirits. Sikhs won over the Morcha and the British Government hadto yield and to accept their demands to have control over their gurdwaras.





MK Gandhi, who had been advising the Sikhs not to oust the Mahants fromgurdwaras forcefully, now issued the statement :

"first battle for Indian freedom had been won by Sikhs."(Harbans Singh, The Heritage of Sikhs, p. 149)

CF Andrews, a British and close assossiate of MK Gandhi remarked :

"A new heroism learnt through suffering has arisen in the land. A new lesson in moral warfare hasbeen taught to the world by Sikhs. It reminded me of the shadow of the cross – To me the spiritof Christ is visible in the peaceful Sikh agitators."

(Manchester Guardian, February 15, 1924)

Madan Mohan Malviya, the eminent congress leader, remarked :

"If Hindus desire to achieve freedom for them and their country, then it is essential and imperativefor them to convert at least one of their sons as a Sikh in each and every family."

(Dr. Gopal Singh, A History of the Sikh People, p. 657)

British Government Yielded to Sikhs to enact Sikh Gurdwaras Act 1925The British government yielded to the Sikhs as it used to yield earlier after testing

the determination of the Sikhs. But this time the agitation had been prolonged withmore sufferings and bitterness. The British were finding it hard to pacify the Sikhs.They released all the arrested Sikhs and declared the enactment of the Sikh GurdwarasAct for the statutory management of the gurdwaras directly by the Sikhs through theirelected representatives. The British government assured the Sikhs that they wouldnever interfere in their religious affairs and neither would they ever come into sucha conflict with the Sikhs. Thus the British again tactfully pacified the Sikhs to avoidany future conflict with them. The Sikhs got their long standing demand accepted toget the enactment of management of their gurdwaras directly by them through theirown elected representatives under a statute after having ousted the Mahants from allthe gurdwaras.

Sikh Gurdwaras Act 1925The British Government enacted the Sikh Gurdwaras Act 1925. It came into effect

on November 1, 1925. According to the provisions of this Act :

i) All historical Sikh gurdwaras were to be under the direct control of SGPC.ii) Other gurdwaras, specified therein were to be under the local management

committees to be elected under the supervision of SGPC.iii) SGPC was to be elected by all the Sikh voters and it was to elect its office

bearer for one year.





Originally the management committee was named as Control Board, but onOctober 2, 1926 its name was changed to SGPC – Shiromani Gurdwara ParbandhakCommittee in accordance with the wishes of Sikhs by amendment.

The first election of SGPC was held on June 18, 1926 and its first meeting washeld on September 4, 1926. The office bearers and executive committee were electedon October 2, 1926. Baba Kharak Singh, was elected the President, while Master TaraSingh as Vice President of the first SGPC.

The new SGPC took over the management of Sikh gurdwaras on November 11,1926 from the previous SGPC which had been formed by the Sikhs themselves. TheSikhs successfully achieved their aim to get the management of Sikh gurdwaras directlyunder them through their elected representatives under a piece of legislation.

A Sikh judicial commission was provided in the Sikh Gurdwara Act to decide thedisputes inter-se as to the religious matters arising out of the implementation of thematters relating to the provision of Sikh Gurdwara Act, ousting the jurisdiction of civilcourts.

It is to the great credit of Sikhs and Sikh leaders to have suffered supremesacrifices and adversities in selfless service to the Sikh cause to achieve their aim andto bring the Sikh gurdwaras under the management of Sikhs themselves. The Britishgovernment yielded to Sikhs to enact Sikh Gurdwara Act 1925 after over fortythousand Sikhs courted arrests, five hundred Sikhs martyred and twenty thousandSikhs were injured, besides the withdrawls of Jagirs and Pensions, confiscation ofproperties and imposition of fines etc. of hundreds of thousands of Sikhs. In spite ofall these excesses upon Sikhs they kept the movement peaceful in totality, exhibitingthat Sikhs, who showed exemplary courage on the battlefields, could also initiate andmaintain a peaceful movement of this kind all the while maintaining high moral andethical values.

The names of Sikhs and Sikh leaders needed to be recorded on the golden pagesof Sikh history for having ousted the Mahants and taking gurdwaras under the directmanagement of Sikhs by making supreme sacrifices in the process. Kartar SinghJhabbar with his jatha was always in the forefront. Bhai Lachhman Singh set theexample never to desist from Ardas but opting to be martyred along with the jatha.Sunder Singh Majithia, Harbans Singh Attari, Mehtab Singh, Kharak Singh, MasterTara Singh, Prof Jodh Singh, Teja Singh Samundri and several other educated Sikhsremained determined to make this movement a success. In fact, it is due to the senseof devotion to the Sikh cause and commitment to the Sikh code of conduct, that allthe Sikhs were ready to suffer any sacrifice in this movement and therefore, theydeserve all to be praised and appreciated by coming generations.

Under Sikh Gurdwaras Act 1925, to become voter for SGPC, a Sikh has to makethe declaration :

"I solemnly affirm that I am a Sikh; that I believe in Guru Granth Sahib, that I believe in the tenSikh Gurus, that I have no other religion, I am not patit."





A Sikh who becomes patit (apostate) by committing any violation of 5 K's as Do'sor 4 kuraihats as don't's of Sikhism, automatically is disqualified to be a voter as heis deemed to have been excommunicated from the Sikh Panth till re-entry by re-initiation, i.e. taking Amrit, after seeking apology from the congregation. The so called'Sehajdhari Sikhs, having no entity in Sikhism had not been given any right to vote.There is no mention of such a word which is outside the Sikhs dictionary. The SikhGurdwara Act had mentioned in its provisions only the word Sikh which obviouslymeans, one who has been initiated in the prescribed procedure and strictly adheresto the Sikh code of conduct. All the members of SGPC were such Sikhs commonlycalled Amritdhari as there was no other category in Sikhs. It has been so settled inthe debates on gurdwara bill.

Raja Narindra Nath, stated on the first gurdwara bill that “the Guru Granth Sahibis nothing more nor less than the higher teachings of Vedas and Upnishads in popularlanguage and Sikhs are Hindus." (PLCD, April 5, 1921, p. 539)

It was replied to by Mehtab Singh, Barister at Law :

"I, for one say that if the Sikhs do not wish to remain in the fold of Hinduism, why should theHindus seek to force them to do so ? What benefits can they obtain by keeping an unwilling peopleas partners in their community ? Why not let them go ? That Sir, is at the bottom of the wholeexcitement. The Hindus say we will manage your affairs for you as your gurdwaras are partly yoursand partly ours. We say that we wish to manage our own affairs and look after our own gurdwarasand are determined to do so."

(PLCD, April 8, 1921, p. 583)

Dr. Gopal Chand Narang stated :

"Sikhs are flesh of our flesh and love of our love."(PLCD, July 6, 1925, p. 1214)

After the debate on this issue it had been finally settled that only Sikhs who arenot patits come under the definition of 'Sikh' and only they can be voters for SGPC.This statutory dictum was followed without any further controversy as laid down inthe provisions of Sikh Gurdwaras Act 1925. At the time of the formation of SGPC bySikhs in 1920, it was decided at Akal Takhat that only Amritdhari Sikhs could becomethe members of SGPC. Guru Gobind Singh the tenth Sikh Guru, had made the Sikhinitiation of Amrit (Pahul of double-edged sword) to be mandatory for all the Sikhs.But it was only in 1959 that political fraud was played in the legislation by theamendment of Sikh Gurdwara Act, 1925 by introducing the word Sehajdhari in it tobecome a voter. It was the mischief of the Congress to attempt taking SGPC from thecontrol of the Akali Dal by fraudulent means to enroll non-Sikhs as voters for SGPC,though in Sikhism there is no class of Sikhs as Sehajdhari Sikhs. Either one is a Sikhor not, The Central government is stated to have repealed that amendment now in2003 at the repeated requests of SGPC. Better to be late that never !





Sikhs Active involvement in politics (1926-1947)Akali Dal – Sikh political party

After the management of Sikh gurdwaras having been taken over by Sikhs underSikh Gurdwaras Act, 1925 through SGPC, a statutory representative elected institutionby Sikhs – the aim of the gurdwaras reform movement – stood achieved. The religiousfunctions, preaching of Sikhism and the management of historical Sikh gurdwaras,was now under the domain of SGPC. The Sikh educational institutions aimed at bySingh Sabha movement had been set up and the local Sikh population was seized ofthis matter to set up Sikh schools and colleges in their areas for the education of theiryounger generation. Akali Dal was now to devote its time and energy to the Sikhpolitical affairs as the political representative party of Sikhs. It was to be a hard timefor the political leaders of the Sikhs as communal conflict had already started andthere was Hindu-Muslim tension and there was the struggle for Indian independencefrom British rule. The rights of Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs the – three main religiousgroups – were to be settled at the time the British Quit India.

The Sikhs before 1926 were not very active in politics. From 1920-1925 theyremained occupied in the Akali movement to oust the Mahants from gurdwaras andto get direct control over their religious places. Prior to this they remained busy inthe renaissance and self awakening of their religion which had been diluted by theMahants under the patronage of the Brahmanical cult and the British administration.Then there was the Singh Sabha movement to set up gurdwaras and educationalinstitutions throughout Punjab besides the publication of Sikh journals, tracts,newspapers and other literature to educate all of the Sikhs. The elective legislativebodies were brought into existence by the British in 1909 for the active participationof Indians and that too with limited powers. Chief Khalsa Dewan took part initiallyin Sikhs political affairs which had spearheaded the Singh Sabha movement. Mainlythe rich educated Sikhs with big estates were prominent in the nominated or electivebodies to start with.

The Punjab Legislative Council was set up in 1897. The first six members of thePunjab Council were well known persons of caliber who had good relations with theBritish administration : Baba Sir Khem Singh Bedi, Bhagat Singh, a chief secretary ofKapurthala state; Sir Ranbir Singh, Partap Singh Ahluwalia, Yuvraj Ripudaman Singhof Nabha and Arjan Singh of Bagrian. They had been nominated by the GovernorGeneral council.

Minto Morley Reforms, 1909 had introduced the election process to the legislaturefor the first time. Muslims had pressed for separate electorates. Chief Khalsa Dewanfollowed them to ask for separate electorates for Sikhs. The British government onlyconceded to Muslim demand and not of the Sikhs. However more nominations weremade by Lt. Governor Punjab to Sikh quota by Sunder Singh Majithia as representativeof Chief Khalsa Dewan, Gurbakhsh Singh Bedi and Gajjan Singh, a lawyer of Ludhiana.





In 1919, Govt. of India Act was introduced. Congress and Muslim League enteredinto a pact called "Lucknow pact” and at Lucknow meeting they drafted an agreementconceding the demand of separate electorates. Sikhs were not invited there. ChiefKhalsa Diwan sent a memorandom to the Lt. Governor that they would not acceptany constitution which did not provide adequate representation to Sikhs in thelegislative and administrative wings with due regard to their status before theannexation of Punjab, claiming 1/3rd share in all these institutions. In 1917, Secretaryof state, Montague visited India and a delegation of Sikhs met him to press their claim.The Montague Chelsford report was issued in 1918 accepting the claim of the Sikhsand extending the system to Sikhs which had been adopted for Muslims.

In the provisions of Govt. of India Act 1919, Sikhs were not given the 33% shareclaimed by them but their share was fixed, to be 15 seats out of 93 in Punjab LegislativeCouncil to be elected by Sikhs; 3 out of 145 in the Central Assembly; one, out of 60,in the Council of States. Chief Khalsa Diwan sent four member delegation to Londonto demand more Sikh share. The Sikh representation in Punjab was increased by twoonly and nothing more. In 1920 Sunder Singh Majithia, representative of Chief KhalsaDiwan was nominated to Governor's executive council while Jogindra Singh to thecouncil of states. From 1926 onwards Akali Dal dominated the Sikh politics.

The Sikh leaders of Akali Dal were at a disadvantage as in comparison to thecongress leaders. They lacked the political skills and experience and educationalqualification, which led to their exploitation by congress leaders in crucial and criticaltimes. The congress leaders were also not totally above communal considerations,though working under the garb of secularism. One aspect was optimistic that Sikhson the whole, followed Sikh leaders, having confidence in them as they hadspearheaded successfully the gurdwara reforms movement with sacrifices andselflessness.

Congress leaders, MK Gandhi and others, knew well that Sikhs were under thecommand of Akali leadership and that the Congress could have no base in Punjabwithout the co-operation and support of the Sikhs. So they planned to win over theAkali leaders to get the Sikh support for their party and Indian Independencemovement. Two main issues had cropped up, to be relevant for Sikh support. Onewas the legislature representation of Sikhs as Muslims had already been fighting fortheir effective representation. The other was the National flag issue, which containedthree colours white, green and red but red was changed to saffron by the Congressin 1931 symbolising the religious colours of Christians, Muslims and Hindus. Sikhleaders wanted insertion of Kesri colour symbolizing the Sikhs religion. Both thesecontroversial issues were not solved by congress leaders as these manifested theseparate Sikh identity which congress leaders, particularly MK Gandhi, did not wantto concede and was openly advocating the Sikhs to be a part of Hinduism. Congressleaders could not annoy the Sikhs as their support was very crucial; so they tried toprolong these issues by appointing committees and commissions on one pretext or the





other. However Sikhs involved themselves in the Indian Independence movement, asthey stood for the freedom of India from the British empire.

Simon Commission boycotted by Akalis–1927On November 8, 1927, Simon Commission was announced by British government

to review the working of reforms. Simon Commission visited Lahore on October 30,1928. Akalis boycotted it, following the boycott by the congress. However on 24.1.1928Raghbir Singh of Raja Sansi formed the Central Sikh Association, which presented theSikh case before the Simon Commission. Sikhs got no relief from the Commission.

Moti Lal Nehru report rejected by Sikhs – 1928Sikhs advocated complete abolition of separate communal representation

throughout the country or to give them adequate representation on the same linesas was to be given to Muslims. The committee headed by Moti Lal Nehru recommendedthe abolition of communal representation in Punjab only to avoid Sikh separaterepresentation on the same hidden agenda that Sikhs would then not be termed aspart of Hindus. The communal approach of these Hindu Congress leaders tried to tagthe Sikhs with the Hindus intentionally and not conceding to their separate identity.At All Parties Conference; Sikhs rejected Nehru report outrightly.

Sikh leaders walked out of Calcutta conference – 1928On December 28, 1928, All Parties Conference was held at Calcutta. At that

conference Mehtab Singh, Sikh leader moved an amendment that “communalismshould not be formed as basis of future policy of India in any shape or form." Dr.Ansari, President of the Conference, ruled out this amendment. Sikh leaders walkedout of that conference.

Gandhi’s efforts to pacify the Sikhs – 1929Congress leaders realized that Sikh sentiments had been aroused against

Congress. The Muslim league had already disassociated itself from the Congress,feeling that Congress leaders were communal and starting from MK Gandhi were alsoHindu fundamentalists and so Muslim interests were not safe with them. So, Congressleaders planned to win over the Sikh leaders at any cost, though not to concede anyissue of substance as far as possible. In that strategy Gandhi gave the statement that,"Personally I think we have not done full justice to the Sikhs," without elaboratingthat how he would now ensure the full justice to them. In February 1929, he wentto attend a Sikh conference at Karachi and told them to be patient and not to losefaith in the congress." In October, 1929, he sent a special messenger to Lyalpur toattend conference of Sikhs with the message to Sikhs that "the issue of Sikh





representation was not closed but open for discussion and consideration." It did notprove any success as Baba Kharak Singh announced the boycott of congress sessionby Sikhs which was to be held at Lahore in December 1929.

Congress leaders met Akali leaders and gave assurances to Sikhs –December 1929

On December 27, 1929, on the eve of the Annual Congress and Akali Dalconvention at Lahore, Indian National Congress leaders MK Gandhi, Moti Lal Nehru,Dr. Ansari along with some others went to Baba Kharak Singh and held discussionwith Akali leaders, besides him, Master Tara Singh, Mehtab Singh and others. Gandhitold Akali leaders that their demands as to the rejection of Moti Lal Nehru report andagainst dominion status have been accepted by the congress. Assurance was also givento the Sikh leaders that congress would never accept any constitution which wouldbe unacceptable to Sikhs, thereby, giving freedom to Sikhs to decide their politicalstatus and insert any provisions in the constitution to their liking on to theirautonomous state a constitutional power as to shape these matters was to be inaccordance with the provisions of the constitution. It was also ensured that a formalresolution would be passed at the congress session. The resolution in this regard wasactually passed on December 29, 1929 at the annual session of the congress at Lahore.

(A.L. Bannerjee, Indian Constitution Documents, Vol, II)

Congress session a poor show at Lahore 1929Akali Dal also held its conference at Lahore in the days of the congress session.

On its eve, a procession was taken out by the Sikhs with Baba Kharak Singh, PresidentAkali Dal, seated on an elephant in which over half a million Sikhs (500,000)participated. The Sikhs had exhibited their solidarity with Akali Dal. On the other handthe congress session was a poor show, though all its national leaders had come toparticipate in it. Even, Times of London took notice of it and reported the Akali Dalconference :

"A most impressive spectacle of human congregation, that put the congress show in shame andshadow."

Baba Kharak Singh Authorized to Continue Negotiation 1929The Sikh conference authorized Baba Kharak Singh to constitute a committee for

the continuation of the negotiations with congress. However Master Tara Singh, issueda statement on his own congratulating the congress resolution particularly Gandhi,for it and hoped that overall support of Sikhs for congress in future, which obviouslylacked political wisdom and shrewdness on his part as it weakened the negotiationaspect.





Contradictory stands of Baba Kharak Singh and Master Tara Singh,1930

Master Tara Singh got the participation of the Sikhs in large numbers on theJanuary 26, 1930, Independence Day celebrations and later on in the civil disobediencemovement of the congress. He was taken into the ‘war council’ set up by Punjabcongress. Master Tara Singh was also made the dictator of the civil disobediencemovement after the arrest of Dr. Kitchlu. He was elected to All India CongressCommittee. He offered 5000 Akali volunteers to participate in the freedom movementunder the Akali Dal Flag. On the other hand Baba Kharak Singh, President Akali Dalhad a stiff stand. He refused to co-operate with the congress unless Sikh Kesri colourwas included in the National Flag. He even went to the extent of submitting hisresignation if Akali Dal did not refuse to fight under the congress flag which did notinclude Sikh colour. Master Tara Singh replaced Baba Kharak Singh as President AkaliDal to the relief and jubiliation of congress leaders, who found Baba Kharak Singh,a difficult nut to crack. Master Tara Singh ensured the co-operation of Sikhs to congresson empty assurances without yielding any substance. If Master Tara Singh had showntoughness like Baba Kharak Singh, the congress leaders would have yielded to Sikhdemands but at a crucial and critical stage, he did not put up a fight to the net congressleaders.

Master Tara Singh admitted his differences with Baba Kharak Singh and criticizedhim in his autobiography at page 111, that :

"After the Nehru report (1928) was rejected by the Sikhs and was not accepted by the British either,the congress also withdrew it next year and passed the resolution that no constitution would beacceptable to congress which would not satisfy the Muslims, Sikhs and other minorities." Thissatisfied us but Baba Kharak Singh was no longer for co-operation with congress unless the Sikhcolour was added to the congress flag. When this was done he objected that yellow nor ochre wasthe Sikh colour. And such objections went on multiplying till he resigned both offices."

However, later on, after the freedom of India in 1951, Jawahar Lal Nehru, PrimeMinister praised Baba Kharak Singh saying that :

"I do not see anybody in the country today who can be compared in courage, bravery andtruthfulness with Baba Kharak Singh."

MK Gandhi's Assurance to Sikhs at Gurdwara Sahib-1931On Feb. 26, 1931 MK Gandhi visited Gurdwara Sis Ganj Delhi and assured the

Sikhs in presence of the Guru Granth Sahib :

“I venture to suggest that the non-violence creed of the congress is the surest guarantee of its goodfaith and our Sikh friends have no reason to fear betrayal at its hands. For the moment it did so,the congress would not only seal its own doom but that of the country too. Moreover the Sikhs





are a brave people. They know how to safeguard their rights by the exercise of arms if it shouldever come to that. Let God be the witness of the bond that binds me and the congress with you."

(Young India, 19.3.1931)

The congress betrayed all the assurances given to Sikhs. Gandhi had beenassassinated in 1948. So it is conjectural as to how Gandhi would have reacted tothis betrayal.

Round table conferences 1931-32 : Sikhs did not participateThe British held the Round Table Conference with Indian leaders in 1931-32 for

the discussion of the question of Indian Freedom and other matters in controversy.Sikhs did not participate in the first RTC. As sole representative of congress, MasterTara Singh presented the 17 demands charter of Sikhs to MK Gandhi and wanted himto represent the Sikhs too. What a political immaturity on the part of Master TaraSingh ! He should have attended the conference himself to put forth the Sikh pointof view or have deputed some other capable and competent Akali leader for thatpurpose. The obvious consequence was that the Sikh case went unrepresented. TheIrony is that Gandhi was a known critic of Sikh separate identity and always openlypropagated that Sikhs are part of Hindus. Still he was authorized to represent theSikh case. Interestingly MK Gandhi addressed the second RTC on the issue of separateelectorate for depressed classes :

"We do not want on our register and on our census untouchables as a separate class. Sikhs mayremain as such in perpetuity. So may Mohammadans, so may Europeans. I do not mind untouchablesif they so desire being converted to Islam or Christianity. I should tolerate that but I can not possiblytolerate what is in store for Hinduism if there are two divisions set forth in villages."

(C.W. Vol 58, p. 192)

No doubt, Bhupinder Singh Maharaja of Patiala, Sampuran Singh and Ujjal Singhas invitees of the Viceroy attended the first and second Round Table Conference atLondon, but they could not represent the Sikhs in reality because their main politicalrepresentative party, the Akali Dal, did not send its leaders to attend these conferencesunder the influence of congress party. The congress wanted an assurance to attendthe first Round Table Conference to frame the dominion constitution of India insteadof any other discussions which the British Government was not ready for. So it decidedits non participation in the conference, which was followed by the Akali Dal workingin alliance with the congress. In its 1929 Lahore annual session, congress passed aresolution for complete independence instead of dominion status. The SimonCommission in its report in May 1930 had suggested a federal constitution with twohouses of the legislature at the centre and autonomy for provinces and Princely states,but not wide powers for the central Govt. As to the Sikhs, it provided some assurancethat :





"It would be unfair that Mohammadans should retain the very considerable weightage, they nowenjoy in six provinces and that there should be at the sametime be imposed in face of Hindu andSikh opposition, a definite muslim majority in the Punjab and in Bengal, unalterable by any appealto the electorate."

(Simon Commission report Indian statutory commission report)

The purpose of the first Round Table Conference was to discuss the Simoncommission report by the British with Indian leaders. The principle of separateelectorate was accepted in this conference due to the total rejection of joint electorateby the Muslim representatives.

On March 5, 1931, 'Gandhi-Irwin pact' was signed, due to some understandingbetween MK Gandhi and Lord Irvin, whereby the congress leaders were set free fromjails and the congress withdrew its resistance movement, thereby paving the way forthe congress leader MK Gandhi to attend second Round Table Conference at London.Akali Dal still kept it unrepresented at this conference. However this conference couldyield no result as no compromise could be arrived at on the most complex issue ofthe communal representation. Gandhi was not agreeable to separate electorate whileJinnah was adamant about it, rejecting the joint electorates to never be acceptableto muslims. Ujjal Singh and Sampuran Singh though not representing the Akali Daland being the invitees of Viceroy only, demanded 30% representation for Sikhs inPunjab, while 5% at the centre with at least one Sikh as cabinet minister. But nosettlement could be arrived at on this crucial issue. The second Round TableConference thus proved to be a total failure for the purpose for which it was convened.The British Prime Minister himself gave the award on communal representationyielding the separate electorates to all the minorities on April 16, 1932. Muslims weregive 331/3% representation at the centre, with 86 out of 175 seats in Punjab. Sikhswere given only 33 seats out of 175 in Punjab; 3 out of 50 in NWFP; 6 out of 250in federal legislative assembly; 4 out of 150 in council of states, which was totallyinadequate for Sikhs.

No Sikh representative attended third RTC. Sikhs naturally achieved nothing inthese conferences, not even getting their presence felt.

Sikhs Rejected Communal Award-1932On August 16, 1932 Sikhs rejected the Communal Award as 51 percent

reservation was provided to Muslims in Punjab while only 19 percent to Sikhs. Sikhsorganized Akali Shahidi Dal with 100,000 volunteers to spearhead the agitationagainst the award. However nothing substantial was achieved by Akalis with such ahollow slogan.

Govt. of India Act 1935British Government enacted Govt. of India Act, 1935 to constitute the legislative





assemblies and to elect their representatives by Indian voters and to form theirgovernments. It was with the purpose of involving Indians in such a limited democraticprocess to provide semi-Independence and democratic rights to Indians to participatein such political activities.

Gandhi and Ambedkar Rift over Depressed classes and SeparateElectorate-1936

Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, leader of depressed classes—the untouchables, considered tobe the lowest in Hindu society, was for a separate electorate for them so that theymay have their own political say, while Gandhi a conservative Hindu, vehementlyopposed it in favour of a joint electorate, for which he had already advocated at thesecond Round Table Conference going to the extent of saying that if untouchableswant a separate electorate status, they may convert to Islam or Christianity, whichhe thought they would never do so because of their religious and cultural distinctionsand contradictions. Gandhi had not advised them to convert to Sikhism which couldbe possible and rather he openly embarrassed the Sikh religion. Dr. Ambedkar foundno other alternative for the depressed classes than to embrace Sikh religion, whereinthere was no distinction of caste and creed and every one enjoyed equal status, asotherwise they would perpetually suffer in Hindu society as untouchables.

Dr. Ambedkar Planned to Embrace SikhismAfter consultations and deliberations with Sikh leaders Dr. Ambedkar made it

publicly known that he along with over five millions of untouchables would embraceSikhs religion. Sikhs set up a press at Bombay for publication of its paper Janta andestablished Khalsa college at Bombay for imparting higher education to the newconverts. Hindu Maha Sabha leaders did not oppose it as they thought it to be thelesser evil than of their conversion to the semitic religions – Islam or Christianity.However, the so called secular leader MK Gandhi could never tolerate it, though ithad no concern with the independence movement of his Congress party.

MK Gandhi’s Staunch Opposition to Ambedkar's Move 1936Gandhi raised a hue and cry against Dr. Ambedkar's move to embrace Sikh

religion himself and by his followers to raise their status as equals and not to remainuntouchables. He termed this move to be a dangerous move as he could never envisagethe depressed classes to be out of the Hindu domination. He addressed a letter tohis friend Jugal Kishore Birla, dated September 7, 1936, who had welcomed this movealong with other Hindu leaders :

"Today I will only say that to me Sikhism is a part of Hinduism but the situation is different fromthe legal point of view. Dr. Ambedkar wants a change of religion. If becoming a Sikh amounts to





conversion, then this kind of conversion on the part of Harijans is dangerous. If you can persuadethe Sikhs to accept that Sikhism is a part of Hinduism and if you can make them give up the separateelectorate, then I will have no objection to 'Harijans' calling themselves Ramanujis or Sikhs"

(C.W., Vol 63, p. 267)

In his article in the Harijan of September 19, 1936 Gandhi wrote :

"Dr. Ambedkar does not regard Sikhs as Hindus. He definitely wants a change of faith. If Sikhswere Hindus that would not matter. Since Sikhs consider themselves to be a separate religion andhave separate electorate, no one could be a party to the proposal put forth by Dr. Ambedkar andMoonje."

(C.W., Vol. 63, p. 294)

Gandhi's conversation with Sujan SinghMaster Tara Singh sent Master Sujan Singh, General Secretary All India Sikh

Mission to MK Gandhi to personally talk to him to dissuade him from opposition toAmbedkar's move to embrace Sikh religion. The conversation as reported betweenthem depicts that Gandhi was firm in his stand and rather avoided calls on such acrucial matter. The conduct of Gandhi in opposing Dr. Ambedkar's move to embraceSikhism, establishes him to be a more Hindu fundamentalist and extremely communalthan the so called fundamentally Hindu communal leaders, though he had the garbof secularism, being the leader of the Nationalist Congress Party. It was not his concernas a leader of Indian Freedom movement to meddle into the affairs of a person orclass of persons to be embracing or following one religion or the other, whatsoever.Not only this, MK Gandhi even went to the extent of 'fast unto death' to get theGovernment notification that untouchables were Hindus and would be entitled tospecial concessions only if they remained within Hindu fold and not otherwise, sealingtheir future emancipation from Manu Samrities dictum that denouncement of castesystem would pollute dharma itself, by frustrating the move of Dr. Ambedkar. Thesame is the plight of the so called untouchables, though more than half a century haspassed over and is to remain so till they are in the Hindu fold–a caste and creed riddensociety. Sikh leaders also did not play their cards well. It is a reflection on them andtheir capability and sincerity to the cause for their failure to convert Dr. Ambedkarand his followers to Sikh religion.

1937 Punjab Assembly ElectionsAkali Dal under the leadership of Master Tara Singh contested the 1937 Punjab

assembly elections in co-operation with the Congress Party and agreed that Akalimembers of legislature would form part of congress legislative party and be regulatedby its discipline as well because of the close contacts of master Tara Singh with thecongress leaders. Though it could not be in Sikh interest as Congress leaders like MKGandhi did not even tolerate the separate Sikh identity and were rather playing the





game of exploiting Sikhs against the Muslims. Khalsa National Party under the leadersof Chief Khalsa Diwan, therefore, came into formation under the leadership of SirSunder Singh Majithia and Sir Joginder Singh, which was also backed by Baba KharakSingh and Giani Sher Singh of Central Akali Dal, staunch opponents of Master TaraSingh. Khalsa National Party got 14 seats as against Akalis who could get only 10seats, while the socialists only one. Unionist Party under leadership of Sir SikandarHayat Khan formed Government in Punjab in coalition with Khalsa National Partyincluding its leader Sunder Singh Majithia in the cabinet. On October 15, 1937,Unionist Muslims joined Muslim League under Sikander Jinah party.

Akali Dal-Congress Rift 1940Declaration of war in 1939 brought the rift between Akali and Congress out in

the open as their strategies and line of action were not in conformity on this crucialissue. Akali Dal formulated Khalsa Defence League with Yadvindra Singh Maharajaof Patitala as its head, while Master Tara Singh and Giani Kartar Singh Akali leadersas its members, to support the British in the war. Mahatma Gandhi in his article inhis journal Harijan, dated November 15, 1939 devised separate Sikh entity anddeclared the assurances given to Sikhs by Congress in 1929 as no more binding.However Jawahar Lal Nehru in double talk gave assurances to Sikhs that Congresswould never ignore the Sikh interests. Gandhi in his article 'Sikhs and Sword' publishedin Harijan dated September 29, 1940 went to the extent of stating that "Sikhs wereunsuitable to remain in the Congress and his letter of August 16, 1940 would applyto the entire Sikh community if they accept Master Tara Singh as their undisputedleader" at the same time contradicting his previous statement as to 1929 LahoreResolution that as "his commitment to it was a sacred trust for him." In his letter ofApril 16, 1940 Gandhi had written to Master Tara Singh :

"As I told you, in my opinion, you have nothing in common with the congress nor the congresswith you. You believe in the rule of sword, the congress does not. Your civil disobedience is purelya branch of violence. I am quite clear in my mind that being in the congress, you weaken yourcommunity and weaken the congress. You have to be either fully nationalist or frankly communaland therefore dependent upon the British or other foreign power."

(The Sikhs in History, by Sangat Singh at p. 176)

On 12.9.1940, Master Tara Singh submitted his resignation from the Congress.The Congress leaders dubbed the Sikhs as Anti-National for supporting the British inwar efforts. Thus there was rift and break down of relations between Akali andCongress.

Pakistan Resolution by Muslim league-1940In march 1940, Muslim league passed the resolution for the formation of their





own independent and sovereign country Pakistan, declaring that the interests ofMuslims are not safe in Hindu dominated India. Mohammad Ali Jinnah, a barristerof Bombay led their movement for the creation of Pakistan.

Punjab Premier asserted Provinces to be free and Autonomous-1941In March 1941, Sir Sikandar Hayat Khan, Premier of Punjab asserted in the Punjab

legislative Assembly that :

"Muslims fear that if the provinces are not free and autonomous, there would always be a dangerof undue and unwarranted interference from the centre which will be dominated by Hindus."

Muslims declared the Hindu Congress leaders to be communal and not to sharepower with them.

Sikandar – Baldev Singh pact 1942Baldev Singh, Akali leader, formed a separate Akali group in Punjab Assembly

in March 1942, including some Khalsa National Party members and independents. TheUnionist turned Muslim league of Sir Sikandar Hayat Khan, Punjab Premier, was alsosupporting the British in the war. On 15.6.1942 Sikandar Hayat Khan and Akalilegislative entered into pact known as 'Sikandar-Baldev Singh pact', under whichBaldev Singh joined the 'Punjab Cabinet', thus Akalis sharing power with UnionistMuslim league party. Akalis breaking ties with congress, Quit India movement ofcongress made no headway in Punjab, because of the Akali and Congress rift.

Sir Stafford Crips's visit to Punjab-1942In March 1942, Sir Stafford Crips, representative of the British Government visited

Punjab, hinting at the possibility of creation of Pakistan and Division of Punjab. TheSikh leaders met him in a delegation and he assured them of British concern for theprotection of Sikh rights and to seek iron clad guarantees as the British would behelpless if the successor government decided to ignore its treaty obligations afterindependence. But the Sikh leaders gave no attention to their aspect and relied uponthe empty assurances of the congress leaders without the firm binding guarantees,to which they refused to implement just after independence. The utterances of Gandhiwere anti Sikhs, but still Sikh leaders, particularly Master Tara Singh relied upon himand his lieutenants without getting any solid iron clad guarantee.

C.R. Formula rejected by Sikhs-1944C. RajGopalachayra, a top congress leader put forth his formula of July 10, 1944

advocating a plebiscite wherever Muslim population was in majority after thetermination of the war to decide the formation of a sovereign Muslim separate state,





in return for the Muslim league's co-operation for the formation of a provisionalinterim government for the transitional period. It also suggested transfer of populationon voluntary basis. It had the approval of MK Gandhi and other congress leaders. Thisformula was rejected by Sikhs to be against the Sikh interests as it obviously acceptedthe formation of Pakistan and division of Punjab. The Sikhs wanted a sovereign Sikhstate if Pakistan was to be formed.

Jinnah conceded the Sikh demand and the Sikhs to be a separate nation.

Master Tara Singh not pressed for Sikh state-1944Akali conference was held at Lahore on October 14 and 15, 1944. In his

Presidential address on October 14, 1944, Jathedar Pritam Singh Gojran demandedthat if India is to be divided, Sikhs must be given their homeland, an independentSikh state on the basis of the land now in their possession of their political importance.However on October 15, 1944, Master Tara Singh moved the main resolution statingthat the demand for an independent Sikh state is not pressed and it was being heldback in order to keep the door open for negotiations. The Akali leaders emphasizedthat the Sikhs were prepared for any kind of settlement but they would in no casetolerate division of India or the establishment of Pakistan.

(N.N. Mitra IAR 1944, vol. 2 p. 219)

The formation of Pakistan was already at the final stage but the Sikh leaders werestill intolerant towards it. Instead of seriously putting forth their demand for a Sikhstate they were seeking to avoid Pakistan which had been already conceded topractically by all the three main forces—the Muslim league, the Congress and theBritish Government The Sikh leadership failed in the assessment of the politicalsituations. The congress leaders exploited them to the last.

Simla conference –1945Lord Wavell called the conference of Congress, Muslim league leaders for the

formation of coalition govt. at centre on June 25, 1945. Master Tara Singh was alsoinvited and he opposed the demand for Pakistan and demanded Sikh state in centralPunjab if Pakistan is to be formed.

Sikh state not demanded in All India Akali Conferrence–1945All India Akali conference was held on September 29-30, 1945 at Gujranwala.

No resolution was passed for the formation of a sovereign Sikh state in that conference.Thus Master Tara Singh's assertion at Simla conference was only an eye wash. Rathera Sikh Election Board to fight the 1946 elections was formed under the leadershipof Master Tara Singh. The support of Akali Dal to congress was ensured in all politicalaffairs. The same slogan of unity of India was repeated, though the partition of the





country was at its anvil. The demand for a separate Sikh state was in contradictionto the demand for the unity of India and against the formation of Pakistan. Formationof Independent Sikh state was to be the reality only with the partition of the countryfor carving out Pakistan an independent state for Muslims, still the Sikh leaders hadbeen opposing it thus being exploited by the congress leaders who had themselvesconceded to the formation of Pakistan privately though opposing it outwardly.

Unionist-Congress Akali Coalition Government 1946In the elections of Punjab assembly held in January 1946, Akalis got 23 seats.

Sir Khizar Hayat Khan Tiwana of the Unionist Party formed the coalition governmentin Punjab at its head with the inclusion of congress and Akali legislatures. Muslimleague remained the opposition party though it had won the largest number of seatsin that election. Its aim was the formation of Pakistan a separate state for Muslims,rather than to gain power in Indian provinces temporarily.

Master Tara Singh and M.A. Jinnah meetingOn 4.4.1946, a meeting between Master Tara Singh and M.A. Jinnah, Muslim

League leader, was held. Jinnah offered the Sikh state including Lahore as its capitaland Nankana Sahib the birth place of Guru Nanak with the eastern side of Punjabto be in confederation with Pakistan but the Akali leader outrightly refused it as hepreferred to side with and the negotiations with Indian congress leaders than Muslimleague leaders.

Sikh leaders rejected British offers of Political PowerCabinet Mission Plan-1946

In February, 1946, British government announced the cabinet mission plan tosend a special mission of the British cabinet, consisting of Sir Stafford Cripps, A.V.Alexander and Pethic Lawrence, secretary of state to India for the finalization ofgranting Independence to India. The cabinet mission came to India on March 24, 1946.Sikh leaders Master Tara Singh, Giani Kartar Singh and Harnam Singh held themeeting with the cabinet mission on April 15, 1946. Baldev Singh met the cabinetmission separately. The Sikh leaders' point of view placed before the commission wasnot uniform in the shape of one consolidated plan but rather confusing with ifs andbuts. By and large their prime demand was the unity and integrity of India withoutany partition to form Pakistan, instead of a separate Sikh state outrightly. But ifMuslims were to be given a separate sovereign status, then they demanded a separateSikh state. If two constituent bodies are to be set up, then Sikhs should also havetheir separate constitution set up. If Hindus and Muslims are to be transferred poweron majority of population basis, then no one should dominate over Sikhs. If there are





to be separate states on two nation theory then Sikhs should have their state withright to federate with Hindustan or Pakistan. "No commission would stand convincedover such type of ambiguous stand. Sikh leaders should have taken one united standthat Sikhs are a separate nation as Hindus and Muslims are and they had their ownrule over Punjab before annexation by British and that now they want their rule backwith a separate independent sovereign Sikh state, of course with some adjustmentsdue to majority population of Muslims in some areas of Punjab, which could be solvedby transfer of population, at least in the areas from River Ravi to Panipat includinghistorical gurdwaras Nankana Sahib, Kartarpur Sahib etc. and Lahore, capital ofPunjab to be in the separate Sikh state.”

"Their demand against partition of the country to form Pakistan was on the faceof it in contradiction to the demand an independent Sikh state which could only comeinto existence with the partition of the country. Moreover it was out of tune as thepartition of the country and formation of Pakistan had been already decided muchearlier by the British Government with the implied consent of the congress. Cabinetcommission members and particularly Sir Stafford Cripps had given clear hints to theSikh leaders for the viability of such a state for Sikhs in between Ravi and Panipat.Moreover Sir Stafford Cripps had given such a hint to Sikh leaders about four yearsback also in 1942 when he had visited India and met the Sikh leaders delegation andas to the creation of separate Muslim state Pakistan as well. Muslim league leaderMuhammad Ali Jinnah had openly conceded to the formation of Sikh state in betweenRavi and Panipat, though with co-federation with Pakistan but that condition of hiscould not be binding upon British Government and he would have withdrawn it attheir instance as Britishers were already obliging him and the Muslims for theformation of their independent state out of India. The Sikh leaders remained underthe exploitation of congress leaders throughout whose main aim was avoidance of aseparate Sikh state as Muslim separate state was a reality for them, which they couldnot avoid. Muslim league leader M.A. Jinnah was a shrewed statesman to be exploitedby congress leaders who outrightly rejected the empty assurances of congress Hinduleaders unlike Master Tara Singh Akali leader, who remained under their net to bebetrayed in free India.

Cabinet Mission ProposalsOn May 16, 1946, cabinet mission released its report and proposals to set up

Indian federation with the Foreign Affairs, Defence and Communication with provisionto raise necessary finances as central subjects. All other subjects and residual powerswere to remain with the provinces. Three groups of states were to be formed. Group Aconsisted of six Hindu majority provinces; group B, included Punjab, NWFP and Sind.While group C had Bengal and Assam. Groups B and C excluding Assam had Muslimmajority population. The groups could frame their own constitution and the provincescould opt out of the group after a period of ten years. It also provided for parity in





the central executive between 6 Hindu majority and 5 Muslim majority provinces witha population of 190 and 90 million respectively.

MK Gandhi, congress leader rejected the plan terming it worse than Pakistan andpleaded for composition of central legislature and executive on the basis of populationwhile Muslim league accepted the cabinet Mission plan vide its resolution dated June6, 1946.

Akalis rejected British Cabinet Mission ReportOn June 9, 1946, Akali Dal rejected the report of the British cabinet mission.

Cabinet Mission's offer to SikhsThe British cabinet mission while in India in early winter of 1946 at Delhi made

the offer to Sikhs through Baldev Singh, the Sikh representative :

"If Sikhs are determined not to part company with Hindu India, the British Parliament in theirsolitude with the Sikh people was prepared to so frame the independence Act of India so that inrespect of Sikh homeland wherein their areas eventually might go in Pakistan or in India, noconstitution shall be framed such as does not have the concurrence of the Sikhs."

This offer of British cabinet mission was rejected by Baldev Singh afterconsultation with congress leaders as the congress would itself provide it. It was apolitical blunder of Baldev Singh, rather Anti Sikh.

Sikhs and Congress Resolutions and DeclarationsResolution for Sovereign Sikh state

On August 20, 1944, All Parties Sikh Conference passed the resolution forIndependent Sikh state.

On March 10, 1946 SGPC elected representative body of Sikhs under Sikhgurdwaras Act 1925, passed the resolution for the formation of independent Sikh state.All the Sikhs were voters of SGPC and as such it was the demand of the entire Sikhnation.

On March 22, 1946, Shiromani Akali Dal the representative political party ofSikhs, passed the resolutions for an independent Sikh state.

These resolutions were passed only to create hurdles in the formation of Pakistanand to assert that if Pakistan is to be formed for Muslim by dividing the country, thena separate Sikh state, Khalistan, be also formed for Sikhs and as such Sikh leadershipdid not take any serious steps for the implementation of these resolutions. Rather Sikhleaders first option was to keep India united.





Congress resolutions for Sikh autonomous stateIndian National Congress also became active in assuring the Sikhs and affirming

their previous pledges to provide a Sikh autonomous state in the Sikh homeland Punjaband the constitutional guarantees in order to undo the offers of the British and Muslimleague for a Sikh state. In July 1946, congress working committee in its meeting heldat Calcutta passed the resolution reaffirming their assurances and promises given toSikhs to set up their autonomous homeland in Punjab with constitutional guaranteesto set up their own self determined political status. Jawahar Lal Nehru gave the pressstatement :

"The brave Sikhs of Punjab are entitled to special constitutions. I see nothing wrong in an areaand set up in the North where Sikhs can also experience the glow of freedom."

(Statesman Calcutta, July 7, 1946)

Jawaharlal Nehru also made the declaration later on :

"Redistribution of provincial boundaries was essential and inevitable, I stand for the semiautonomous units as well. If the Sikhs desire to function such a unit, I would like them to holdsemi autonomous unit so that they may have a sense of freedom."

(National Book Club Publication, 147)

'Congress Party resolution for Sikh rights'On 5.1.1947 congress party passed the resolution :

"The rights of Sikhs in Punjab should not be jeopardised."

In July 1947, Punjab legislative assembly passed the resolution :

"In the divided Indian Punjab special constitutional measures are imperative to meet the justaspirations and rights of Sikhs."

V.B. Patel Announced Sikh StateOn 3.4.1947, Sardar V.B. Patel, the first Home Minister of India, announced the

formation of 'Sikhistan' after independence of India.

Baldev Singh Becomes Defence MinisterAkali Dal representative Baldev Singh had been inducted in the Indian cabinet

formed by Jawaharlal Nehru as Prime Minster on interim basis on September 2, 1946as defence Minister.





Swaran Singh replaced him in the Punjab cabinetCongress leaders thus took every caution to keep the Sikhs with them. Sikh leaders

also stood by the congress having blind faith in them refusing the offers of the Muslimleague and of the British cabinet mission. It was political blunder on their part notto discuss the offer with the British cabinet mission. Even if Sikh leaders wanted toside with India, their autonomous state and constitutional guarantees should havebeen inserted in freedom of India Act."

Sikhs rejected last British Offer 1947On May 17, 1947 British Govt. invited Congress, Muslim league and Sikh leaders

to London for a meeting to give the final touch of the Indian Independence Act.Jawaharlal Nehru of congress, M.A. Jinnah of Muslim league and Baldev Singh of AkaliDal attended that meeting in London. After the meeting, Secretary of state for Indiacontacted Baldev Singh to stay on for further talks to save Sikh interests as :

"Britishers wanted the Sikhs to have a political feet of their own on which they may walk into thecurrent of World history."

Instead of staying there for further talks with the British government Baldev Singhdivulged it to Nehru, who asked him not to stay behind and rather tell the Secretaryof state that Sikhs have no demand, as they have settled their political aspirationswith congress. Baldev Singh acted accordingly and gave a press statement at Londonas desired by Nehru :

"The Sikhs have no demands to make on the British except the demand that they should quit India.Whatever the political rights and aspirations, the Sikhs have, they shall have them satisfied throughthe goodwill of the Congress and the majority community."

Baldev Singh then accompanied Nehru to India disappointing the British andbetraying the cause of Sikhs whom he had represented. Can there be a more bankruptpolitical wisdom and statesmanship ? The Sikhs had only to curse their own fate iftheir representatives were of such a caliber, void of any political understanding andbargaining and having no sincerity towards the Sikh cause.

Baldev Singh had also ignored the Sikhs' interests earlier when he refused theoffer of British Cabinet Commission to safeguard the Sikh political power. These offerswere made by the persons who were at the helm of affairs. British Cabinet Commissioncomprised of three senior cabinet ministers of England while Secretary of state wasthe senior most authority to deal with Indian affairs. The British had a great regardfor Sikhs for their heroism, self respect and dignity. They had themselves seen theSikhs as brave and courageous in the Army who made their name in both the worldwars and earlier in the battlefields in Punjab against them. So they did not want





humiliation and harassment of the Sikhs after independence when they would beunable to do anything for them. But Sikh leaders disappointed them and betrayedthe Sikh cause in not getting in touch with them. It was really a sorry state of affairsfor the Sikhs.

Master Tara Singh, the Akali Chief, and other higher level Akali leaders are alsoresponsible for these political blunders. It was the duty of the Akali Chief to havehimself met and discussed the Sikhs' political power affairs along with other membersof the high command of his party with the cabinet mission and the members of theBritish cabinet when they had shown their desire to have talks in that regard and alsowith the Secretary of state at London, when he invited them.

Penderal Moon's last effort for Sikhs stateSir Penderal Moon, Secretary, Development Board, Govt. of India, a British Senior

officer made a last effort to create a Sikh state, in his letter dated June 27, 1947 tochief of the Viceroy's staff advocating the exclusion of Gurgaon, Hissar, Rohtak andKarnal districts from east Punjab, which had the Hindu majority population. Hementioned in his letter :

"The Sikhs have already put this demand to congress who hesitated to accept it. This Sikh demandshould be taken out of Hindu clutches as they want to be, and put in a more or less independentposition of their own."

He hinted at the creation of a Sikh buffer state between India and Pakistan byplanned migration.

Mountbatten wrote to Jinnah and Nehru. Jinnah sent no reply while Nehrudeclined saying that "the time was short." (The Sikhs in History, Sangat Singh, p. 205)

In spite of such support from the British, the high caliber Sikh leaders made noefforts to get a Sikh state. They rather kept themselves in Hindu clutches, out of whichthe British at a high post wanted them to be taken out and put them in an independentposition even at the last hour. Sikh leaders were singing the tunes of congress leadersonly on the empty assurances of Sikhs autonomous state and constitutional guarantees,which too were deceptive and fraudulent from the very inception. Sikh leaders couldnot find out the lack of bona-fides in those assurances in such a long period that thosemay not be implemented. Then what ? Prolonged confrontation with India. However,the Sikhs true to their own self gave sacrifices in the Indian freedom movement morethan other Indians though in population they were only 2 percent, following the Sikhstradition.

Punjab and Bengal Divided to form PakistanBritish Govt. decided to create Pakistan in Muslim majority areas and to divide

Bengal and Punjab. Lord, Mountbatten, the Viceroy announced it that the respective





legislatives of these provinces would be divided in two parts; one representing Muslimmajority districts and the other, the rest of the Province. Each group would vote foror against partition. If any one group voted for partition a commission would beappointed to draw the line of demarcation. Congress and Muslim league agreed tothe proposals in principle. The Sikh representative Baldev Singh stated that Sikhsposition would be borne in mind in drafting the terms of reference of the boundrycommission. Akali Dal in its meeting held on June 2, 1947 resolved to press for thepartition of Punjab but it demanded that boundries be drawn at River Chenab.(Hindustan Times, June 3, 1947)

In the Punjab legislative assembly, all the Muslim members voted against partitionof Punjab while all Sikh and Hindu members voted for the partition of Punjab province.

Boundary Commission was appointed with Sir Cyril Redcliffe as Chairman, fourjudges—two Muslims and two Hindus—were to be the members of the Commission.Justice Teja Singh, a judge of the Punjab High Court, was also made a member ofthe Punjab Commission. A memorandum of 32 Sikh members of Punjab legislativegiven to the Boundary Commission put up the demand to include all the territoriesup to Chenab in East Punjab, to be a part of India, while the Muslim representativesclaimed the territories up to Ambala district in west Punjab, to be part of Pakistan.The Boundary line between western Punjab and Eastern Punjab was drawn at WaghaBorder in between Lahore and Amritsar. The main historical Sikh Gurdwarasparticularly connected with the founder of Sikhism, Nanakana Sahib and Kartarpur,besides the Lahore city capital of Punjab went to Pakistan side. New Punjab in Indiawas left with no capital of its own and no fertile canal irrigated lands which remainedin west Punjab in Pakistan. Sikh leaders raised a hue and cry that Sikhs should begiven the benefit of the land they held and land revenue they pay but it was of norelevance, as the partition of the country to create Pakistan was based on the majorityof Muslims in those areas, who were consistently agitating for several years for itexhibiting their determination not to stay in Hindu majority India. The British wereout spoken, that Sikhs opted for the partition and so it is their own doing thoughthey expressed a few sympathetic words for Sikhs. There was no time now, to shedcrocodile tears for Sikh leaders as they had lost the game of politics indulging in 'ifsand buts' never putting forth their case consistently for a separate Independent Sikhstate and the exchange of population under the British Regime; rather shoutingsentimental slogans to keep India united and against the creation of Pakistan to thelast with no consideration to the reality of the decision to set up Pakistan much earlier.

On June 14, 1947, the press attache of Lord Mountbatten stated :

"The Sikhs see that the partition of India means substantially and irrevocably the partition of Sikhsand they feel themselves to be sacrificed on the altars of Muslim ambition and Hindu opportunism.No juggling of the boundary commission can prevent their bisection. They react accordingly andthe leaders haplessly outmanoeuvered in the political struggle."

(Campbell Johnson, Mission with Mountbatten, p. 118)





The Governor of Punjab, Sir Evan Jenkins, wrote a letter to Lord Mountbattendated July 10, 1947 regarding his meeting with Giani Kartar Singh, President AkaliDal, wherein he stated :

"Giani told me that British had said for years that they intended to protect the minorities and whathad happened. The present situation was a clear breach of faith by the British. I replied that I realizedthat the Sikhs were dissatisfied but when independence came to any country some classes, whohad formerly regarded themselves as protected invariably suffered. At the same time, I thought theSikhs had only themselves to blame for the present position. The Giani himself insisted on partitionand Baldev Singh had accepted the plan."

On July 13, Jenkins wrote another letter to Mountbatten, stating :

"The Sikhs believe that they will be expropriated and massacred in west Punjab and smothered bythe Hindus and congress generally in East Bengal. They threaten violent rising immediately."

(Leonard and Moslay, The Last Days of British Raj, pp. 205-7)

It is interesting to note that Mountbatten did ask if the Sikh motive was to setup a Sikh state. V.P. Menon replied, No. Politically they had lost out and had not evengained the Jullundur Division. Their motive was almost lost.

(September 15, 1947 Campbell Johnson, Mission with Mountbatten, p. 191)

The Viceroy Lord Mountbatten in his broadcast on June 5, 1947 touched on thefate of the Sikhs that :

"We have given careful consideration to the position of the Sikhs. This valiant community form aboutan eighth of the population of Punjab, but they are so distributed that any partition of this provincewill inevitably divide them. All of us who have the good of Sikh community at heart, are very sorryto think, that the partition of Punjab which they themselves desire, cannot avoid splitting them toa greater or lesser extent. The exact degree of split will be left to the Boundary Commission onwhich they will of course be represented."

(Khushwant Singh, A History of the Sikhs II, p. 272, Lord Mountbatten’s address at All India Radio).

And further; the next day at press conference, Mountbatten stated :

"There are two main parties to this plan – the congress and the Muslim league – but anothercommunity much less numerous, but of great importance—the Sikh community – have of courseto be considered. I found that it was mainly at the request of the Sikh community that congresshad put forward the resolution on the partition of Punjab and you will remember that in the wordsof that resolution they wished the Punjab to be divided between predominantly Muslim and Non-Muslim areas. It was therefore, on that resolution, which the Sikhs themselves sponsored, that thisdivision has been provided for. I was not aware of all the details when this suggestion was madebut when I sent for the map and studied the distribution of Sikh population under this proposalI must say that I was astounded to find the plan which they had produced divided their communityinto two equal parts. I have spent a great deal of time both out here and in England in seeing whetherthere was any solution which would keep the Sikh community move together, without departing





from the broad principle which was demanded on the one side and was conceded on the other.I am not a miracle worker and I have not found that solution."

And at page 274, British parliamentarians had also shown sympathy towardsSikhs on July 15, 1947. R.A. Butler said in the house of commons :

"The British had the happiest possible relations with the Sikh community and of all the martial racesof the world the Sikhs probably had built up the greatest reputation. The only situation which couldmitigate the plight of Sikhs was that the boundary commission should so define the boundary thatthe maximum portion of the Sikhs should be included within one conglomerate."

(The Tribune, July 16, 1947)

While nothing could be now done at this last stage, the Boundary Commissionwas itself bound by the majority population of Muslim criteria on which Pakistan'sfoundation had been laid. It was before setting the issue that the Sikh case was requiredto be built up for independent state by exchange of the population. Now the matterhad gone out of the hands of negotiations. The Sikh leaders now could not changethe policy decisions already taken. They did issue a circular for a free sovereign statenow when confronted with the partition problems, but now it could be of no value.Chief Secretary, Punjab, had sent a note on the Sikh plan :

"The partition plan envisaged, divides the Sikh strength and leaves them in a minority in bothareas..... They have therefore, been driven back on reiterating their demands and perfecting theorganization on their forces. Their endeavour in both directions is positive in character. The Sikhsare pinning their hopes upon the Boundary Commission and the Congress, but their latest circularissued by Shiromani Akali Dal shows that the confidence in the strength of the Panth has neitherbeen undermined nor surrendered. The circular states that Pakistan means total death to the SikhPanth and that the Sikhs are determined on a free sovereign state with Chenab and Jumna as itsborders and it calls on all Sikhs to fight for their deal under the flag of Dal."

(Note on Sikh Plan, p. 25, A History of the Sikhs, p. 273)

Such a circular, distributed to Sikhs could be of no value. If Akalis sought asovereign Sikh state, then they should have put their case to the British Governmentand pursued it constantly with facts and figures to get it conceded on convincinggrounds and to negotiate it with all the parties concerned, so that it could be decidedfavourably before finalizing the independence act. But they refused to even talk tothe British government when invited. Now the stage reached was the demarcation ofthe boundaries on the partition of Punjab which the Sikh leaders themselvesdemanded. No body could do much in this regard as the majority of Muslims wasthe criteria and it was a matter of record. It could only be a few words of sympathyfor Sikhs which their well wishers could utter. The whole process of the independenceof India was finalized creating a separate country for Muslims named Pakistan. TheBritish transferred their powers in all respects to the people of India and the newlycreated Pakistan. Sikhs were divided in both countries but were forced out of Pakistanarea to India.





On August 15, 1947, India achieved freedom under the Indian Independence Actof the British Parliament. India was partitioned and divided in two countries of Indiaand Pakistan as demanded by Muslim league. Mountbatton became the first GovernorGeneral of free India, who had finally settled the Independence issue as the last Viceroyof British Empire. Punjab was bifurcated. West Punjab went to Pakistan from Wagahborder in between Amritsar and Lahore, while the east Punjab remained in India. Sikhsremained in India but the Indian congress leaders and their government refused toimplement their agreement with Sikhs to make their homeland Punjab autonomousstate and the constitutional guarantees as promised. They had to suffer betrayaldiscrimination and persecution in the Indian republic due to the failure of theirleadership to obtain anything solid for their political power and rather having beencaught in the net of clever and crafty congress leaders.

Sacrifices and contribution of Sikhs in Independencemovement

Sikhs made sacrifices and contribution in all respects in the Indian Independencemovement much more than all other Indians though Sikhs comprise only about twopercent of Indian population. According to the statistical records :

i) Out of 121 persons hanged to death, 93 were Sikhs.ii) Out of 2644 persons awarded the sentence for transportation of life, 2147

were Sikhs.iii) Out of 1300 persons killed at Jallianwala Bagh shootings, 799 were Sikhs.iv) Out of 42,000 persons of INA, 21000 were Sikhs.v) Out of Kamagata Maru passengers killed, 22 were Sikhs. The Sikhs from

India and other countries came to give sacrifices.

It shows that Sikhs gave voluntary sacrifices and contributions in the IndianIndependence movement more than forty times of their population ratio in India asthe Sikhs are courageous and dedicated to the cause they take over. Before the Britishduring the struggle against Mughal tyranic rule and Afghan invaders, it was the Sikhsalone, who uprooted the Mughals and Afghans and established their Sikh rule. Theysaved India from these foreign invaders when other Indian population had mostlysubmitted to them. Historians have recorded that otherwise their rule would have beenprolonged. The Hindu scholar Daulat Ram Arya has commented in his book on GuruGobind Singh; “if Sikhs had not been on the scene, most of Hindus would have beenmade circumcised Muslims in Mughal Rule." A price cannot be put on sacrifices ofSikhs, to throw out the foreign powers from India. The Sikh leaders appear to haveblind faith in Indian leaders because of this entire history but in politics these matterscount little. Sentimentalism and sincerity have no place in modern politics.





Failure of Sikh leadershipSikh leaders are responsible for not obtaining Sikh political power at the time

of the granting of Independence to India by the British. They did not play their cardswell. No doubt, Sikh leaders were not well-educated like the barristers of IndianNational Congress and Muslim league and lacked the political experience incomparison to them, besides political manoeuvering and shrewdness, but they alsofailed to be consistent in their political aims and determination. They had blind faithin congress leaders and so were easily caught in their net. They even refused to havediscussions with the British and Muslim league leaders on the only ground thatCongress had given them the assurances for an autonomous Sikh state andconstitutional guarantees for their self determined political status. They put their caseof 'ifs and buts' to the cabinet commission without taking the one clearcut andconsistent stand and when the commission wanted to have further talks, they did notavail of the opportunity. Similarly, they did not meet the Secretary of state wheninvited.

The Sikh leaders were kept by the congress leaders in their confidence and notbecause they wished to negotiate for the Sikh political power independently but moreso under the impression that they are not in majority in any area of Punjab and theminority can have no claim to any area. They should have pleaded for the immigrationof Sikhs from the areas being created as Pakistan on Muslim majority, visualizing theforced migration amidst bloodshed after independence which was what happened.Migration of Sikhs from Pakistan areas to east Punjab and of Muslims to Pakistan areasfrom east Punjab before partition of the country would make east Punjab a Sikhmajority area for Sikh political power. It was a realistic and justified step in thatsurcharged violent communal atmosphere. The bloodshed of forced migration in thepost independence era could have been avoided. This plan was hinted at by the cabinetmission and particularly by Sir Stafford Cripps and even earlier in 1942 by him whenhe met the Sikh leaders. Jinnah had supported this plan. It was the congress leaderswho torpedoed it and kept the Sikh leaders exploited to constantly oppose the partitionof the country to form Pakistan. So much so that on 3.3.1947, when Muslim leaguewas asked to form govt in Punjab, Akali leaders met at Lahore assembly chamber.A crowd of Muslims outside raised provocative slogans for formation of Pakistan. Atthat time, Master Tara Singh, Akali Chief, came out, unleashed his sword and shouted :

"We shall lay down our lives but would not concede Pakistan."

Master Tara Singh was kept so much in ignorance by the congress leaders thathe did not know that formation of Pakistan had long been decided by the Britishgovernment and to which congress leaders themselves had conceded but he was stillshouting emotional slogans against its formation.

Even if the Akali leaders were satisfied with the understanding with the congress





for the autonomous Sikh state as Sikh homeland in Punjab with constitutionalguarantees to set up their own political self determination status and the constitutionto be only that is acceptable to Sikhs, then these agreements should have been insertedin Indian Independence act. In the meeting at London on May 17, 1947 to give finaltouches to the Independence Act, Sikh representative Baldev Singh was present. Heshould have pressed for this to be a part of the Independence Act. Congress couldnot raise any objection to it as it was their offer to Sikhs. If it was left to be so donein the meeting, then with the meeting of Secretary of state, it should have been gotinserted. It is not at all understandable as to why it was not done. If it had been soinserted in Independence Act, the Indian government could never refuse itsimplementation.

Congress leaders exploited Sikh leaders and always kept putting in their mindsof the majority of population to be the only criteria and they were caught in sucha net of Congress to refuse any discussion with any body, including the British whowere to decide each and every matter relating to Indian Independence affairs and toenact the law for that purpose in spite of the offers by them for Sikh political power.

Sikhs had lost their just and genuine cause due to the utter failure of Sikhleadership which was not capable of dealing with the intricate issues at that crucialtime particularly in comparison to the congress and Muslim league leadership. It lackedthe political wisdom, shrewdness and manoeuvering besides self confidence,intelligence and political experiences. Master Tara Singh himself admitted in hisautobiography that : "ignorance of Sikh leadership of the history and world politicsis the reason of their failure to get Independent Sikh state."

Very important historical Sikh gurdwaras including Nankana Sahib, KartarpurSahib and Panja Sahib relating to Guru Nanak, Founder of Sikh religion and DeraSahib Lahore relating to the martyrdom of Guru Arjan Dev and several others relatingto other Sikh Gurus remained in Pakistan. The Sikh leaders should have got it insertedin Independence Act the special provisions for these gurdwaras to continue under themanagement of SGPC and for the visits by Sikhs to these historical Sikh shrines withoutany hindrance from the governments. of Pakistan and India. The absence of whichmade these historical Sikh gurdwaras to be foreign for the Sikhs and SGPC. It hasbeen now made dependent upon these governments to permit or not the Sikhs' visitto these Gurdwaras, what to say of their management by Sikhs ! Sikh leadership wasthus not farsighted.

Master Tara Singh Admitted Ignorance of History and WorldPolitics

Master Tara Singh himself stated at page 197 in his autobiography shedding thecrocodile tears :





"The reason for our not pressing the demand for a Sikh state was our ignorance of history andworld politics. None of us had known that a community could have a state of its own in spite ofits being a minority in that area. Jewish state 'Israel' is one such recent example. I came to knowabout it in 1949 when I was in Almora Prison. I was informed there by some one that RussianNews Paper Pravada had once commented that "In this world there are two communities whopossess all the ingredients of being a nation but have no homeland of their own. These communitiesare Jews and the Sikhs". The Jews have got their homeland but the Sikhs have no homeland oftheir own so far. When Isreal came into existence, the Muslim population there was 600,000,Christians were 86, 000 while jews were only 46,000. But within a few years, the population ofjews has grown up to 6,00,000 due to migration of jews from other countries. But for such ignorance,we might have obtained a Sikh state, particularly when the Britishers sympathised with us."

The comments about Sikh leadership of the two senior most officers, ViceroyGeneral Lord Wavel and Sir Lepel Griffin are very distressing but these are their ownbonafide assessments about them.

In the entry dated March 13, 1947 in Wavell's Journal, London, 1973 at page427, it is recorded :

"The Sikhs who are in a position to negotiate on the spot are disunited and poorly led. Master TaraSingh is stupid and emotional."

In Ranjit Singh Oxford, 1946 at page 16, Sir Lepel Griffin recorded :

"In intellectual competition with Hindus and Muslims, he (the Sikh) was a cart horse pitted againstthoroughbreds."

In 1942, Sir Bertrand Glancy, Governor of Punjab, commented :

"Master Tara Singh was sailing in two boats when he supported the Britishers in war efforts, butat the same time wooed the congress leaders who were against any such support.

These are the impressions of those highly placed persons in the Britishadministration who were effective in the independence affairs dealings. At the crucialhour, an honest well educated and capable leadership was a must for calculating thecorrect assessments, with a shrewd bargaining capacity and not to be emotional andinactive as to leave their fate in the hands of the leaders of other parties with blindfaith in them. It may not be any exaggeration or miscalculation to say that in thetwentieth century, the incapable and politically unwise and inexpressed Sikhleadership, having little farsighted vision on the intricate issues involved, lost the Sikhpolitical power at the time of Indian Independence; as it was destroyed in thenineteenth century by the ambitious rivalaries of Sikh Sardars, the turning of Sikhdemocratic rule to selfish monarchy and bringing Dogras and Brahmins at the helmof Sikh affairs, to have easily become traitors.


