sherifff ronald crockett ex-parte letter to the fcc

1
OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF .... i Uf ' -" 1!1015 FCC Ma\\ 8293 MARY BALL ROAD LANCASTER, VIRGINIA 22503 PHONE: 804-462-5111 FAX: 804-462-7046 www.lancastersheriff,net RONALD 0, CROCKffi, SHERIFF EX PAATE OR LATE FILED Ms. Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street SW Room TW-A325 Washington, DC 20554 Re: Ex Parle Communicati on April 16, 2015 WC Docket No. 12-375; Inmate Calling Dear Ms. Dortch: The Lancaster County Sheriffs Office hereby files an ex parte communication in connection with the proceeding. The Lancaster County Sheriffs Office supports the comments and reply comments filed by the National Sheriffs' Association in this proceeding. The purpose of this filing is to submit additional information specific! to this office in support of NSA's position that Sheriffs must be .allowed to recover their costs ifICS services are to contmue to be widely available in jails. , I Inmate calling is a discretionary service in our jail and it is allowed for the benefit of inmates and their families. not permitted to recover the costs associated with t he pr-0vision. of JCS service, then we can and we may be fi significantly limit or eliminate altogether access to inmate phones in our jail. Currently, we have the incentive t allow significant access to ICS service and .inmates are able to make calls 15 hours per day. Denying payments to ·ails or restricting such payments to levels that do not at least cover our costs, will have the effect of reducing the incen ·ve and ability to continue to allow ICS in this manner. .. · · ·. · ' . .. · .. · .• . : ·· .··. ·: : . ··' . ·:'' . . Our budget has not kept pace with our cost to operate in recent years. In addition to security and administrative fJnctions that must be maintained, there are programs for inmates that we are required to maintain by law. If the k::ost of allowing ICS must compete with all other budget needs, it may not be funded. However, if the cost of a lowing ICS has its own source of funding, it is less likely to be impacted by the budget rocess. . ... . . ;, Accordingly, Sheriffs incur significant costs in allowing ICS in jails and Sheriffs must be allowed to recover their osts to be able to continue to allow.JCS and to encourage the deployment ofICS in jails. If you have any questions, please do not,hesitate to contact me. Sincere1y 1 , ' .. ·. i . ·Ronald D. Crockett Sheriff cc: correspondence file No. of Copies rec'd_ _.O..L-"---- list ABCDE

Upload: eric-markowitz

Post on 11-Nov-2015

14.293 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

A sheriff's letter to the FCC over inmate calling services.

TRANSCRIPT

  • OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF

    .... i Uf'-" ~p~ 1!1015

    FCC Ma\\ ~oorn 8293 MARY BALL ROAD LANCASTER, VIRGINIA 22503 PHONE: 804-462-5111 FAX: 804-462-7046

    www.lancastersheriff,net

    RONALD 0, CROCKffi, SHERIFF EX PAATE OR LATE FILED

    Ms. Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street SW Room TW-A325 Washington, DC 20554

    Re: Ex Parle Communication

    April 16, 2015

    WC Docket No. 12-375; Inmate Calling Servi~es

    Dear Ms. Dortch:

    The Lancaster County Sheriffs Office hereby files an ex parte communication in connection with the above-ref~renced proceeding. The Lancaster County Sheriffs Office supports the comments and reply comments filed by the National Sheriffs' Association in this proceeding. The purpose of this filing is to submit additional information specific! to this office in support of NSA's position that Sheriffs must be .allowed to recover their costs ifICS services are to contmue to be widely available in jails. ,

    I Inmate calling is a discretionary service in our jail and it is allowed for the benefit of inmates and their families. not permitted to recover the costs associated with the pr-0vision. of JCS service, then we can and we may be fi significantly limit or eliminate altogether access to inmate phones in our jail. Currently, we have the incentive t allow significant access to ICS service and .inmates are able to make calls 15 hours per day. Denying payments to ails or restricting such payments to levels that do not at least cover our costs, will have the effect of reducing the incen ve and ability to continue to allow ICS in this manner. .. . '

    . .. .. . . : .. : : . ' . :'' . .

    Our budget has not kept pace with our cost to operate in recent years. In addition to security and administrative fJnctions that must be maintained, there are programs for inmates that we are required to maintain by law. If the k::ost of allowing ICS must compete with all other budget needs, it may not be funded. However, if the cost of a lowing ICS has its own source of funding, it is less likely to be impacted by the budget rocess.

    . ... . . ; ,

    Accordingly, Sheriffs incur significant costs in allowing ICS in jails and Sheriffs must be allowed to recover their osts to be able to continue to allow.JCS and to encourage the deployment ofICS in jails.

    If you have any questions, please do not,hesitate to contact me.

    Sincere1y1 , ' . . . i

    ~drtlvial-. Ronald D. Crockett

    Sheriff

    cc: correspondence file No. of Copies rec'd _ _.O..L-"----list ABCDE