shef fy 2014: summary of data and findings april 30, 2015 andy carlson, senior policy analyst john...

Download SHEF FY 2014: Summary of Data and Findings April 30, 2015 Andy Carlson, Senior Policy Analyst John Armstrong, Information Analyst

If you can't read please download the document

Upload: bertina-wood

Post on 22-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Slide 1
  • SHEF FY 2014: Summary of Data and Findings April 30, 2015 Andy Carlson, Senior Policy Analyst John Armstrong, Information Analyst
  • Slide 2
  • Agenda Overview of SHEF project and changes made for FY 2014 report Findings What the data tell us at the national and state levels Interactive data demonstration Q&A
  • Slide 3
  • Changes to the 2014 Report New design Case studies Interactive data Surveyed SHEFOs, data providers, and policy community prior to making changes
  • Slide 4
  • SHEF Metrics State and Local Support Educational Appropriations Net Tuition Revenue Full-Time Equivalent Enrollment (FTE) Total Educational Revenue Data adjusted for inflation, enrollment mix, and cost of living differences among states Make up the Wave Chart
  • Slide 5
  • SHEF Adjustments - HECA Higher Education Cost Adjustment (HECA) To measure inflation over time, $s adjusted to current year SHEEO developed as an alternative to CPI and HEPI as a means to account for the market basket of goods higher education must purchase, that is, primarily personnel costs Constructed from two existing federal indices - the Employee Cost Index (75%) and GDP-Implicit Price Deflator (25%) FY 2013 appropriation: $1000 Divide by corresponding HECA: $1000/0.9824 FY 2013 appropriation in FY 2014 $s: $1018
  • Slide 6
  • HECA vs CPI - HECA Criticisms HECAs critics argue that HECA has historically grown more quickly than CPI and therefore overstates the amount of support institutions need in order to keep up with inflation A further critique is that HECA is a meaningless figure for families struggling to pay tuition costs HECA CPI
  • Slide 7
  • HECA vs. CPI - SHEEOs Response Higher educations primary costs are driven by personnel expenditures which make up the bulk of the higher education market basket of goods. SHEFs intent is to measure trends in revenue for educational delivery. HECA is a reasonable means to compare available revenue to necessary expenditures Little difference between CPI and HECA since 2007, due to flat salaries. Since 2010, CPI is growing faster than HECA CPI is a better measure for tuition rate increases, which SHEF does not measure. SHEF tracks changes in net tuition revenues
  • Slide 8
  • SHEF Adjustments EMI and COLA Enrollment Mix Index (EMI) To adjust for differences in the mix of enrollment and costs among types of institutions among the states Aggregated IPEDS data Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) To account for cost of living differences among the states Derived from the 2003 Berry Index that provides a single index for each state State X with $1000 educational appropriation Adjust by EMI: $1000/0.95 = $1053 Adjust by EMI and COLA: $1053/1.01 = $1043
  • Slide 9
  • National Findings
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • State-level findings
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Slide 18
  • Slide 19
  • What does the future hold? Is this recovery sustainable? States still making cuts Pension challenges Oil dependent states Structural issues Tax policy Goods v. services Amazon
  • Slide 20
  • Interactive Data Demonstration
  • Slide 21
  • Questions