session 1 stefan johansson

24
Beyond Climate Neutral Climate Positive Urban Districts and the Stockholm Royal Seaport (SRS) as an Example Stefan Johansson PhD Candidate, Division of Industrial Ecology (IE), KTH, Stockholm

Upload: olena-tatarchenko

Post on 14-Jun-2015

71 views

Category:

Documents


5 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Session 1 stefan johansson

Beyond Climate Neutral Climate Positive Urban Districts and the Stockholm Royal Seaport (SRS) as an Example

Stefan Johansson

PhD Candidate, Division of Industrial Ecology (IE), KTH, Stockholm

Page 2: Session 1 stefan johansson

Presentation topics

• The process to climate positive and IE’s work together with CCI and the City

• How to account emissions – scopes & boundaries

• Some preliminary results on the road towards climate positive

• How can a very ambitious target such as climate positive play a role in a climate neutral city or district?

Page 3: Session 1 stefan johansson

The climate positive process (1/2)

• The process has been developed using CCI’s climate positive development program

• It has then been refined by IE into two instruction documents and one Excel tool regarding:

- How to compile a baseline of emissions according to CCI’s specifications

- How to track emissions, emission reductions and credits

• Is being implemented in Stockholm (SWE), San Francisco (US) and Pedra Branca (BRA)

Page 4: Session 1 stefan johansson

The climate positive process (2/2)

Page 5: Session 1 stefan johansson

CCI in practice

• Focuses on low energy use, a high degree of renewables, local energy generation AND a system of credits (if necessary)

• A very local urban district focus with three main emission categories; energy, transportation and waste

• Allows for technology and policy actions that reduce emissions in the surrounding areas called credits

• Emission reductions through flexible Kyoto mechanisms such as CDM, JI and ETS are not allowed

Page 6: Session 1 stefan johansson

CCI’s scopes & boundaries (1/3)

Target A climate positive urban district where GHG emissions are < 0 once the entire urban district is complete

Unit of measure Ton CO2e/capita, year 49 000 person (19 000 residents & 30 000 workers)

System boundaries

- Geographical SRS’s geographical area (*transportation an exception)

- Activity Direct emissions from energy use stemming from activities within SRS’s geographical area

- Temporal Annual emissions once the entire area is built

- Life cycle (LCA) LCA emissions from fuels and energy carriers

Page 7: Session 1 stefan johansson

CCI’s scopes & boundaries (2/3)

Primary emission categories

- Energy Heating/Cooling Electricity (building & household/commercial) Emission reductions from local energy generation (solar pv, biogas) Infrastructure Water

- Transportation 40% of all trips starting or ending in SRS Residents (private trips & commuting) Workers (commuting & business trips) Goods & services

- Waste Collection & treatment

Page 8: Session 1 stefan johansson

CCI’s scopes & boundaries (3/3)

Excluded emissions

Excluded due to geography Services that is common for a normal person living in Stockholm - Hospitals - Libraries - Municipal government - Sports and recreational centres

- Long distance travel

Excluded due to time - Construction emissions

Excluded due to the methodology itself

- Consumption of goods and food

Page 9: Session 1 stefan johansson

Basic principle for GHG accounting

Activity x Emission factor = Emissions

Common activities Corresponding emission factor(s)

Heating [kWh/year] g CO2e/kWh of district heating

PKM by biogas car [PKM/year] g CO2e/PKM of biogas car

Page 10: Session 1 stefan johansson

An example of calculating emissions using data from the SRS baseline (1/2)

Residential buildings in SRS Data value & unit

District heating* 42.5 kWh/m2, year

Hot water* 25 kWh/m2, year

Building electricity* 15 kWh/m2, year

Household electricity 30 kWh/m2, year

District heating emission factor 99.46 g CO2e/kWh

Nordic electricity emission factor 74.76 g CO2e/kWh

Total residential area built 1,143,400 m2

*Included in energy requirements regarding building energy efficiency

Page 11: Session 1 stefan johansson

An example of calculating emissions using data from the SRS baseline (2/2)

Emissions [Ton CO2e/year]

District heating 4,833

Hot water 2,843

Building electricity 1,282

Household electricity 2,564

Annual residential building emissions 11,522

District heating energy use: 1,143,400 m2 * 42.5 kWh/m2, year = 48,594,500 kWh/year Emissions from district heating: 48,594,500 kWh/year * 99.46 g CO2e/kWh = 4,833 ton CO2e/year

Page 12: Session 1 stefan johansson

SRS baseline emissions

Page 13: Session 1 stefan johansson

So far not climate positive time for

road mapping

• Three basic types of road mapping actions:

1. Energy efficiency – For example more energy efficient buildings. The fuel or energy carrier however stays the same

Page 14: Session 1 stefan johansson

So far not climate positive time for

road mapping

• Three basic types of road mapping actions:

1. Energy efficiency – For example more energy efficient buildings. The fuel or energy carrier however stays the same

2. Fuel switching – Switching from Nordic electricity to electricity generated by wind power. The amount of energy used is however the same

Page 15: Session 1 stefan johansson

So far not climate positive time for

road mapping

• Three basic types of road mapping actions:

1. Energy efficiency – For example more energy efficient buildings. The fuel or energy carrier however stays the same

2. Fuel switching – Switching from Nordic electricity to electricity generated by wind power. The amount of energy used is however the same

3. Behavior change – Actions that focuses on either energy efficiency or fuel switching through behavioral change

Page 16: Session 1 stefan johansson

Some preliminary examples of possible roadmapping actions

Energy Road mapping Actions

Buildings

Energy efficient buildings – 55

kWh/m2, year

Energy efficient buildings – 45

kWh/m2, year

Solar PV cells – 30 % of building

electricity

Solar PV cells – 80% of building

electricity

Local Energy Production

Reduced energy use to clean and

distribute water

Reduced energy use to clean and

distribute water

Biogas production (sewage) –

Henriksdal

Biogas production (sewage) – Loudden

Biogas production (food waste) –

Henriksdal

Biogas production (food waste) –

Loudden

Biogas production (cruise ships) –

Loudden

Remaining biogas (sewage) -

Henriksdal

Page 17: Session 1 stefan johansson

Visual representation of the process

-5000

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

Baseline After EnergyEfficiency

After Fuel-Switching

After Credits

Baseline and Road map example

Infrastructure

Waste

Water

Transportation

Building Energy

Energy Production

Page 18: Session 1 stefan johansson

Roadmapping so far

• So far SRS has reduced annual per capita emissions from roughly 0.55 ton CO2e/cap, year

• Down towards 0.3 to 0.2 ton CO2e/cap, year

Page 19: Session 1 stefan johansson

Still not climate positive credits?

• Credits aim to increase local collaboration between the urban district and the surrounding city by reducing the city’s emissions either through:

1. Physical infrastructure such as energy, transportation and waste

Page 20: Session 1 stefan johansson

Still not climate positive credits?

• Credits aim to increase local collaboration between the urban district and the surrounding city by reducing the city’s emissions either through:

1. Physical infrastructure such as energy, transportation and waste

2. Decisions made through the process of the urban district

Page 21: Session 1 stefan johansson

Why use a method such as CCI’s?

• Compared to many of the other tools Nils showed CCI has an extremely ambitious and explicit goal – climate positive

Page 22: Session 1 stefan johansson

Why use a method such as CCI’s?

• Compared to many of the other tools Nils showed CCI has an extremely ambitious and explicit goal – climate positive

• Transparency is the key, otherwise comparisons between other urban districts are impossible and valuable experiences and solutions are lost

Page 23: Session 1 stefan johansson

Why use a method such as CCI’s?

• Compared to many of the other tools Nils showed CCI has an extremely ambitious and explicit goal – climate positive

• Transparency is the key, otherwise comparisons between other urban districts are impossible and valuable experiences and solutions are lost

• The process of baseline, roadmap and credits offer a wide variety of different kinds of solutions and also offers the urban district to test how far different actions will get them

Page 24: Session 1 stefan johansson

Thank you!

Questions?

Contact info: [email protected]