seminar series 2

44
Seminar series 2 Protein structure validation

Upload: ave

Post on 05-Jan-2016

20 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Protein structure validation. Seminar series 2. Structure validation. Everything that can go wrong, will go wrong, especially with things as complicated as protein structures. What is real?. What is real?. ATOM 1 N LEU 1 -15.159 11.595 27.068 1.00 18.46 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Seminar series 2

Seminar series 2

Protein structure validation

Page 2: Seminar series 2

Structure validation

Everything that can go wrong, will go wrong, especially with things as complicated as protein structures.

Page 3: Seminar series 2

What is real?

Page 4: Seminar series 2

What is real?

ATOM 1 N LEU 1 -15.159 11.595 27.068 1.00 18.46ATOM 2 CA LEU 1 -14.294 10.672 26.323 1.00 9.92ATOM 3 C LEU 1 -14.694 9.210 26.499 1.00 12.20ATOM 4 O LEU 1 -14.350 8.577 27.502 1.00 13.43ATOM 5 CB LEU 1 -12.829 10.836 26.772 1.00 13.48ATOM 6 CG LEU 1 -11.745 10.348 25.834 1.00 15.93ATOM 7 CD1 LEU 1 -11.895 11.027 24.495 1.00 13.12ATOM 8 CD2 LEU 1 -10.378 10.636 26.402 1.00 15.12

Page 5: Seminar series 2

X-ray

Page 6: Seminar series 2

X-ray

Page 7: Seminar series 2

X-ray

‘FFT-inv’

FFT-inv

And now move the atoms around till the calculated reflections best match the observed ones.

Page 8: Seminar series 2

Multiple minima

X-ray refinement / multiple minima

Page 9: Seminar series 2

X-ray R-factor

Error = Σ w.(obs-calc)2

R-factor = Σ w.|obs-calc|

Page 10: Seminar series 2

X-ray resolution

Page 11: Seminar series 2

NMR data collection

Page 12: Seminar series 2

From NMR spectra to structure

A

B

If proton A and proton B are close in space, so-called ‘cross peaks appear’ in a spectrum due to the Nuclear Overhauser Effect (NOE).

The NOE depends on the distance between proton A and B

Page 13: Seminar series 2

From NMR spectra to structure

A

B

The NMR data thus contains distance information!

Most NOEs are between close neighbours in the sequence. Those hold little information.The ‘good’ NOEs are between atoms far away in the sequence. There are few of those, normally.

H1 H2 Distance(Å)A B 3A C 4B D 2C D 1.. .. ..

Page 14: Seminar series 2

From NMR spectra to structure

The list of distances can be used in a computer simulation that is reminiscent of protein folding.

Page 15: Seminar series 2

From NMR spectra to structure

.. until the protein is ‘folded’.

Page 16: Seminar series 2

From NMR spectra to structure

NMR ‘ensemble’

Page 17: Seminar series 2

Multiple minima

NMR refinement

Page 18: Seminar series 2

NMR refinement

Green lines:Distance OK

Red lines:Protons too far away from each other

Page 19: Seminar series 2

NMR Q-factor

Error = Σ NOE-violations + Energy term2

Page 20: Seminar series 2

NMR versus X-ray

With X-ray you measure reflections. Each reflection holds information about each atom. With NMR you measure pair-wise distances, angles, and orientations. These all hold local information.

X-ray requires crystals, and crystals cause/are artefacts.NMR is in solution, but provides much less precision.

Page 21: Seminar series 2

NMR versus X-ray

NMR X-ray‘Error’ 1-2 Å 0.1-0.5 ÅMobility yes not reallyCrystal artefacts no yesMaterial needed 20 mg 1 mgCost of hardware 4 M Euro near infinite (share)Drug design no almost

Better combine and use the best of both worlds.

Page 22: Seminar series 2

More about (protein) crystallography and NMR in:

KristalstructuurMagnetische ResonantieFourier Analyse

and Structuur, Functie, Bioinformatica, of course

Page 23: Seminar series 2

Why validation ?

Why have we spend twenty years to search for millions of errors in the PDB?

Page 24: Seminar series 2

Validation because:

Everything we know about proteins comes from PDB files.

Errors become less dangerous when you know about them.

And, going back to the connecting thread through this series, if a template is wrong the model will be wrong.

Page 25: Seminar series 2

What kind of errors can the software find?

Administrative errors.Crystal-specific errors.NMR-specific errors.Really wrong things.Improbable things.Things worth looking at.Ad hoc things.

Page 26: Seminar series 2

Smile or cry?

A 5RXN 1.2 B 7GPB 2.9 C 1DLP 3.3 D 1BIW 2.5

Page 27: Seminar series 2

Little things hurt big

Page 28: Seminar series 2

X-ray specific

Page 29: Seminar series 2

His, Asn, Gln ‘flips’

Page 30: Seminar series 2

Hydrogen bond network

Page 31: Seminar series 2

Your best check:

Page 32: Seminar series 2

Contact Probability

Page 33: Seminar series 2

Contact Probability

Page 34: Seminar series 2

Contact probability box

A positive nitrogen around a Phe

Page 35: Seminar series 2

How bad is bad?

X-ray

In a normal distribution, half of the points are above and half of the points are below average

In a normal distribution, 68% of the points are within 1 standard deviation of the mean

Less than 1 in 10000 points is more than 4 sd away from the mean

95% are within 2 sd

ΔG = -RT ln K

Page 36: Seminar series 2

One slide about homology modelling

Page 37: Seminar series 2

How difficult can it be?

1CBQ

2.2 A

Page 38: Seminar series 2

How difficult can it be?

Page 39: Seminar series 2

How difficult can it be?

Page 40: Seminar series 2

How difficult can it be?

Page 41: Seminar series 2

How difficult can it be?

1CBQ

2.2 A0.33

1.000.33

0.33

0.33

Page 42: Seminar series 2

How difficult can it be?

1CBQ

2.2 A

Even if the oxygen labels would have been reversed,the so-called ‘asymmetric unit’ could also have been chosen in a much better way…

This is what standard viewers show:

Page 43: Seminar series 2

Errors or discoveries?

Buried histidine.

Warning for buried histidine triggered biochemical follow -up and new mechanism for KH-module of Vigilin. (A. Pastore, 1VIG).

Page 44: Seminar series 2

Acknowledgements:

Elmar Krieger Sander Nabuurs Chris SpronkMaarten Hekkelman

Rob Hooft

Robbie Joosten