selling science

18
SELLING SCIENCE Framing, and How Discovery is only Half the Battle By Justin Appler

Upload: anana

Post on 24-Feb-2016

81 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Framing, and How Discovery is only Half the Battle By Justin Appler. Selling Science. In This Presentation. What is Framing? Neurological Basis Framing in Science Framing in AI Using Framing. What is Framing?. A social perception of a social phenomena - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Selling Science

SELLING SCIENCEFraming, and How Discovery is only Half the Battle

By Justin Appler

Page 2: Selling Science

In This Presentation What is Framing? Neurological Basis Framing in Science Framing in AI Using Framing

Page 3: Selling Science

What is Framing? A social perception of a social phenomena In other words, the frame through which we

look at things

Page 4: Selling Science

Estate Tax Death Tax

59% of Americans support keeping the Estate Tax

58% of Americans called the Death Tax “completely unfair”

Page 5: Selling Science

Drilling ANWRFor Oil

Exploring ANWRFor Energy

53% of Americans oppose drilling in ANWR

67% of Americans support exploring ANWR for Energy

Page 6: Selling Science

What’s wrong with us? Critical thinking is a process in the

Prefrontal Cortex Emotions tend to be focused in the

Amygdala What happens when given decisions?

Page 7: Selling Science

Framing Effect Study Participants asked a financial decision

while undergoing Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)

Simple Financial Decision2 Groups: “Gain” frame and “Loss” frameShown starting funds (50 GBP)Given 2 options on what to do with the funds

(Save/Lose or Gamble)

Page 8: Selling Science
Page 9: Selling Science

Results When given the option to “Save ₤20”,

61% chose to “Save” When given the option to “Lose ₤30”,

42% chose to “Lose” Thus

Significant difference in choice based merely on how the options are presented

Page 10: Selling Science

Brain Scans

Page 11: Selling Science

Framing and Science Special Interest Groups can influence

Policy, Funding, and Implementation Presenting Science no longer simply a

“Statement of Fact” but a “Negotiation of Meaning”

Page 12: Selling Science

Where it could have helped… Genetically-modified Foods

In the US, 45% of the corn, 85% of soybeans, and 76% of cotton planted were GM

In the European Union, almost no GM crops and fewer GM foods in stores

Why? No consistent frame allowed one positive and one negative outcome

Page 13: Selling Science

Why does AI need to be ‘Framed’?

Page 14: Selling Science
Page 15: Selling Science

Technophobia Pre-existing Negative Perceptions Nanobots

Planet-consuming ‘grey goo’ Sentience

‘Playing God’ frame

Page 16: Selling Science

Don’t Get Framed Learn about Communication, Take

ClassesCommunication is a Science, too

Don't Rely on Popular ScienceEvidence has shown that evidence is not

enoughFacts must be carefully presented

Page 17: Selling Science

Don’t Get Framed Try it out (Focus Groups)

Try and determine how people understand the topic

Which claims/points work best, which instill FUD

Be AwareIf research is controversial, employ expertsDon't get blindsided

Page 18: Selling Science

Sources http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14170927/

http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/313/5787/684

http://www.neurosciencemarketing.com/blog/?p=83

http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ulh&AN=15529570&site=ehost-live

http://www.pewtrusts.org/uploadedFiles/wwwpewtrustsorg/Reports/

Food_and_Biotechnology/Biotech_USEU1205.pdf

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technophobia

http://www.soc.american.edu/docs/Scientist.pdf

http://www.soc.american.edu/docs/newagendas.pdf

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/17/magazine/17DEMOCRATS.html?

pagewanted=5&_r=1&ei=5070&en=e3e686efd4fa97c5&ex=1183608000