scott midavaine, otr swedish medical center. discuss how use of technology combined with functional...
TRANSCRIPT
Discuss how use of technology combined with functional tasks can improve outcomes
Benefits of Neuroprosthesis over traditional FES systems
Efforts to limit the severity of the initial injury to minimize loss of function
Efforts to reorganize the brain to restore and compensate for function already lost or compromised
Collateral Sprouting
Neuroplasticity changes in neural
pathways and synapses to adapt to changes in behavior, environment and neural processes, as well as changes resulting from injury.[1]
Good- Compensation Assistive devices Use of normally working extremity
Better- Repetition PROM AAROM AROM
Best- Functional Use
Neuroplasticity and repair depends on the performance of functional tasks and not just use of extremity.
Adjacent brain areas adopted the function of damaged brain areas that receive a full rehabilitation program
Use of low level electrical currents to stimulate and facilitate increased mvmts in muscles.
Usually focused on single muscles or muscle groups.
Normally used in repetition type exercises
Need to place 2-4 electrodes consistently in right place to be effective.
Uses water moistened electrode pads Uses electrical currents to stimulate
muscle contraction Electrical stimulation also excites sensory
and proprioceptive receptors to utilize feedback systems
Is a neuroprosthetic to be utilized during functional activities
5 electrodes vs 2-4 electrodes includes 1 Thenar electrode to facilitate lateral
pinch After being fitted, the panels (electrodes)
remain in place to decrease time needed to find most effective placement.
Enables patient to utilize hand functionally with stimulation and having prosthetic in place.
Videohttp://youtu.be/Px6CJUfZOhQ
RepetitionsPersonal- programable (spasticity reduction)Exercise- repeated flexion and extensionOpen Exercise- repeated extensions and relaxationsGrasp Exercise- repeated flexions and relaxationsFunctional UseOpen- Opening and maintaining an extended positionGrasp- Grasping and releasing objects in a palmar graspKey- Gripping and releasing objects between thumb and the lateral border of the index finger
Stimulation intensity should be set at the lowest level possible to get the desired results Fatigue
FES stimulates type II muscle fibers instead of normal fatigue resistant type I fibers.
Mimic true muscle contraction Minimize pain=increased compliance
Should decrease intensity as grip/pinch improves
Edema management Spasticity reduction Functional use Blood circulation Improved sensation Increased attention to neglected
extremity
Research Study by Ring et al. studied Effectiveness of Neuroprosthetic in improving hand function in stoke victims with moderate to severe UE paresis.
6-week Study Assessments
Modified Ashworth Scale Box & Blocks Test Jebsen-Taylor hand test (simulated eating and
lifting light/heavy objects)
Procedures Both groups had traditional therapy
3 days/wk for 3 hrs/day Occupational Therapy
ADL retraining Bobath Neuromuscular re-education
PT and SLP Neuroprosthetic Group
In addition to traditional therapy Started at 10 min 2x/day progressing to 50 min
3x/day
Results Spasticity
Control Group 9% improvement (2 or less)
Neuroprosthesis Group 64% improvement (2 or less)
Active Movement Control Group
No statistical significance Neuroprosthetic Group
Shld flex increased 28 degrees Wrist ext increased 17 degrees Wrist flex increased 21 degrees
Results Functional Movement
Control Group Box & Blocks Test
2% improvement Jebsen-Taylor Object placement
9-16% improvment Neuroprosthetic Group
Box & Blocks Test 50% improvement
Jebsen-Taylor Object placement 36-39% improvment
Pain and Edema Control Group
Out of 5 patients with pain 1 reported improvement
No change in edema Neuroprosthesis Group
100% decrease in pain reported 100% improvement in edema