sample australian national report 2006

Upload: felipe-alejandro-mora-veloz

Post on 03-Jun-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/12/2019 Sample Australian National Report 2006

    1/43

    Prepared for

    Sample MLQ Report

    Your Raters

    Effective Average Scores

    2006

    Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire

    Feedback ReportBernard M. Bass and Bruce J. Avolio

    Tran

    sformation

    al2.1

    2.3

    Tran

    sactio

    nal

    Tran

    sformation

    al2.1

    Tran

    sactio

    nal 2.5

    Tran

    sactio

    nal 2.5

    Passive Active

    Passiv

    e/A

    void

    ant

    Tran

    sactio

    nal 2.5

    1.6

    0.9

    Passiv

    e/A

    void

    ant

    0.9

    Frequency

    Ineffective

    Australasian Edition designed by MLQ Pty. Ltd. Melbourne.

    Distributed by MLQ Pty. Ltd. for MindGarden Inc. (USA).

    P.O. Box 199Hawthorn Vic. 3122

    Australia

    www.mlq.com.au [email protected]

    Passiv

    e/A

    void

    ant

    Profiled against a full range of

    leadership styles

    0.9

    0 = Never

    1 = Once in

    a while

    2 = Sometimes

    3 = Fairly often

    4 = Frequently,

    if not

    always

    5 Is

    CR

    MBE(A)

    MBE(P)

    LF

    MLQ 360

    Builds Trust (IA)

    Acts With Integrity (IB)

    Inspires Others (IM)

    Encourages InnovativeThinking (IS)

    Coaches People (IC)

    Rewards

    Achievements (CR)

    Monitors Mistakes

    (MBE-A)

    Fights Fires

    (MBE-P)

    Avoids Involvement

    (LF)

    1996, 2002 by Bernard M. Bass and Bruce J. Avolio. All rights reserved.

  • 8/12/2019 Sample Australian National Report 2006

    2/43

    Sample MLQ Report

    PageIntroduction 3

    The Full Range Leadership Model: Transformational Leadership 4Transactional Management 5Passive / Avoidant 5Outcomes of Leadership 6

    Some Research Findings 6

    Making the Most of Your Report 7

    Your Full Range Leadership Profile: Transformational Leadership 10Contingent Reward 11Management-by-Exception: Active 11Management-by-Exception: Passive 11Laissez-Faire 11

    Outcomes of Leadership Overview 12

    Self & Rater Group Feedback: Transformational Leadership 13Transactional Leadership 15

    Passive Avoidant Behaviours 16Outcomes of Your Leadership 17

    Comparison with Norms: Transformational 18

    Transactional and Passive / Avoidant 19Outcomes of Leadership 20

    Your Transformational Leadership: Style Strengths 21Areas for Development 22

    Self - Rater Gaps: Self and Higher level Raters 23Self and Same level Raters 24Self and Lower level Raters 25

    Self and Other level Raters 26

    Complete Reporting of All Rater Responses: Transformational Leadership Styles 27

    Transactional Leadership Styles 32Passive / Avoidant Behaviour Styles 34Outcomes of Leadership 36

    Three Open-ended Questions: Responses 39

    Individual Planning and Goal Setting 42

    Contents

    The section 'Making the Most of Your Report' provides important guidance about how to access the extensive

    information contained in this report.

    MLQ 360 MLQTeam ODQ

    1996, 2002 by Bernard M. Bass and Bruce J. Avolio. All rights reserved. 2

  • 8/12/2019 Sample Australian National Report 2006

    3/43

    Sample MLQ Report

    The Scope of this Feedback Report:

    Full Range Leadership Model Factor Labels

    Transformational LeadershipThe five I's of transformational leadership: Idealised Attributes (Builds Trust) IA

    Idealised Behaviours (Acts With Integrity) IB

    Inspirational Motivation (Inspires Others) IMIntellectual Stimulation (Encourages Innovative Thinking) IS

    Individualised Consideration (Coaches People) IC

    Transactional Leadership - ManagementConstructive - Contingent Reward (Rewards Achievements) CR

    Corrective - Management-by-Exception: Active (Monitors Mistakes) MBEA

    Passive-Avoidant Leadership BehavioursPassive - Management-by-Exception: Passive (Fights Fires) MBEP

    Avoidant - Laissez faire (Avoids Involvement) LF

    The MLQ also measures three outcomes of a person's leadership profile:

    Your Followers

    Extra Effort

    Individual, Unit and Organisational Effectiveness Ratings

    Satisfaction

    The MLQ report will help you to develop a plan for enhancing your "full range" of leadership potential to achieve

    optimal outcomes with followers and associates. This report is feedback on how you and others perceive thefrequency of different leadership behaviours you exhibit.

    The MLQ measures leadership styles which may be grouped under three broad categories differentiated by their

    respective outcome effects and the nature of the influencing processes involved.

    It has been shown in numerous independent scientific studies that these outcomes - and many others such as

    productivity, innovation and sales performance - are achieved at the highest levels when transformational leadership

    is optimally used. Such deeper influencing augments the usual transactional leadership often associated with

    'management'. The best leaders use a full range of influencing spanning transformational and transactional styles.

    The MLQ Profile Report provides feedback which enables optimisation of frequencies with which this full range of

    leadership repertoire is used over time with followers and associates to achieve the strongest outcomes.

    The feedback is first profiled against research benchmarks to optimise outcomes. Comparisons are then provided

    with several norms (which may not be 'optimal' in terms of research findings).

    Introduction

    Following are items measured in each of the full range of leadership factors and items of the three outcome scales

    contained in the MLQ multirater survey. Eight of the factors measure behaviours which are trainable; the ninth factor

    measures important attributions about transformational leaders. Each factor is measured by four questions in the

    MLQ5x - like four different coloured over-lapping "spot lights" for each factor which together illuminate an important

    part of the "leadership stage".

    MLQ 360 MLQTeam ODQ

    1996, 2002 by Bernard M. Bass and Bruce J. Avolio. All rights reserved. 3

  • 8/12/2019 Sample Australian National Report 2006

    4/43

    Sample MLQ Report

    The Full Range Leadership Model

    Transformational Leadership

    Builds Trust (IA)

    Instil pride in others for being associated with themGo beyond self-interest for the good of the groupAct in ways that build others' respect for me

    Display a sense of power and confidence

    Acts With Integrity (IB)

    Talk about their most important values and beliefsSpecify the importance of having a strong sense of purposeConsider the moral and ethical consequences of decisionsEmphasise the importance of having a collective sense of mission

    Inspires Others (IM)

    Talk optimistically about the futureTalk enthusiastically about what needs to be accomplished

    Articulate a compelling vision of the futureExpress confidence that goals will be achieved

    Encourages Innovative Thinking (IS)

    Seek differing perspectives when solving problemsGet others to look at problems from many different angles

    Coaches People (IC)

    Spend time teaching and coaching

    Consider an individual as having different needs, abilities, and aspirations from othersHelp others to develop their strengths

    Treat others as individuals rather than just as a member of the group

    Suggest new ways of looking at how to complete assignments

    Transformational leadership is a process of influencing in which leaders change their associates awareness of what

    is important, and move them to see themselves and the opportunities and challenges of their environment in a new

    way. Transformational leaders are proactive: they seek to optimise individual, group and organisational development

    and innovation, not just achieve performance "at expectations". They convince their associates to strive for higher

    levels of potential as well as higher levels of moral and ethical standards.

    Re-examine critical assumptions to question whether they are appropriate

    MLQ 360 MLQTeam ODQ

    1996, 2002 by Bernard M. Bass and Bruce J. Avolio. All rights reserved. 4

  • 8/12/2019 Sample Australian National Report 2006

    5/43

    Sample MLQ Report

    Transactional Leadership

    Rewards Achievements (CR)

    Provide others with assistance in exchange for their efforts

    Make clear what one can expect to receive when performance goals are achievedExpress satisfaction when others meet expectations

    Monitors Mistakes (MBEA)

    Focus attention on irregularities, mistakes, exceptions, and deviations from standardsConcentrate my full attention on dealing with mistakes, complaints, and failures

    Keep track of all mistakesDirect my attention toward failures to meet standards

    Passive / Avoidant Behaviour

    Fights Fires (MBEP)

    Fail to interfere until problems become seriousWait for things to go wrong before taking actionShow a firm belief in "If it aint broke, dont fix it."Demonstrate that problems must become chronic before I take action

    Avoids Involvement (LF)

    Avoid getting involved when important issues ariseAbsent when needed

    Avoid making decisionsDelay responding to urgent questions

    Discuss in specific terms who is responsible for achieving performance targets

    Transactional leaders display behaviours associated with constructive and corrective transactions. The constructive

    style is labelled Contingent Reward and the corrective style is labelled Management-by-Exception. Transactional

    leadership defines expectations and promotes performance to achieve these levels. Contingent Reward andManagement-by-Exception are two core behaviours associated with 'management' functions in organisations. Full

    range leaders do this and more.

    Another form of Management-by-Exception leadership is more passive and "reactive": it does not respond to

    situations and problems systematically. This style is has a negative effect on desired outcomes - opposite to what is

    intended by the leader - manager. In this regard it is similar to laissez-faire styles - or "no leadership". Both types of

    behaviour have negative impacts on followers and associates. Accordingly, both styles can be grouped together as

    'Passive - Avoidant Leadership'.

    MLQ 360 MLQTeam ODQ

    1996, 2002 by Bernard M. Bass and Bruce J. Avolio. All rights reserved. 5

  • 8/12/2019 Sample Australian National Report 2006

    6/43

    Sample MLQ Report

    Outcomes of Leadership

    Extra Effort

    Get others to do more than they expected to doHeighten others desire to succeed

    Increase others willingness to try harder

    Effectiveness

    Are effective in meeting others job-related needsAre effective in representing others to higher authorityAre effective in meeting organisational requirementsLeads a group that is effective

    Satisfaction

    Uses methods of leadership that are satisfyingWork with others in a satisfactory way

    Some Research Findings

    The nine factor Full Range Leadership Model has been shown to best represent the

    data collected by the MLQ when sample characteristics and situation factors are

    statistically controlled.

    Transformational and Transactional leadership are both related to the success of the group. Success is measured

    with the MLQ by how often the raters perceive their leader to be motivating, how effective raters perceive their leader

    to be at different levels of the organisation, and how satisfied raters are with their leader's methods of working withothers.

    Transformational leaders created greater alignment around strategic visions and

    missions.

    Transformational leadership behaviour factors are associated with organisational

    sales increases, market share, earnings and ROI.

    Scores on transformational leadership predict individual and group performance.

    Transformational leadership training has been shown to improve leadership and

    associated performance over time.

    Transformational leadership has been found to explain between

    45% and 60% of organisational performance.

    Transformational leaders created greater unit cohesion, commitment, and lowerturnover.

    Transformational leadership predicted higher levels of product innovation in R & D

    teams.

    Transformational leaders created safer work environments.

    MLQ 360 MLQTeam ODQ

    1996, 2002 by Bernard M. Bass and Bruce J. Avolio. All rights reserved. 6

  • 8/12/2019 Sample Australian National Report 2006

    7/43

    Sample MLQ Report

    About the Report

    !

    !

    !

    !

    !

    !

    !

    !

    !

    !

    Maximising the MLQ Report

    When viewing your report for the first time keep in mind the following suggestions:

    1.

    2.

    your profile is compared with universal, national and, where they exist, local organisational norms. These

    enable you to see how your leadership contrasts with these other benchmarks. Effective leadership, as

    indicated by research, is usually the best benchmark against which to optimise your own leadership - not just

    comparisons with norms. These dual benchmarks for assessment - research-driven as well as aggregate

    norms - are one of the strengths of the unique MLQ Report.

    your top six transformational leadership strengths ('Style strengths') are presented

    unedited comments by your raters to the three open-responses are provided.

    your six areas for developing your transformational leadership ('Areas for Development') are highlighted

    gaps between your self-ratings and the ratings of others ('Self-Rater gaps') are provided in a graph format.

    the collated responses for each of the thirty-six leadership items (four questions for each of the nine factors)

    are presented

    the collated responses for the nine items assessing the three outcomes (extra effort, effectiveness and

    satisfaction) are presented

    Complete reporting of all feedback data

    Making the Most of Your ReportLook through the following eight suggestions before you begin closely reading your MLQ Report. This

    approach has been extensively tried and proven to be quite powerful. It will speed up your accessing of theextensive information in the report, and your processing of this to produce a unique and dedicated set of

    leadership development objectives.

    Unfortunately leadership assessment, as it is often practiced, does not often lead to leadership training and

    development. However the MLQ is an excellent tool for developing a unique leadership development plan. Some

    general tips are given in the last pages of the report to help you make the most of this investment. By far the bestresults are obtained when you work with a dedicated Leadership Coach trained in the MLQ. You will be helped to

    move between the "big picture" of the initial sections of your MLQ Report and the final "detailed sections" to establish

    a specific and trainable set of objectives for your development using another complementary resource 'The Leader's

    Notebook'.

    The following summarises the structure of the MLQ report as outlined in the contents list on page 2:

    Your Full Range Leadership Profile: this section contains important reference background information

    Aids to assist you to establish your own Leadership Development Plan

    your leadership profile is presented using average aggregate scores, including your own self-ratings

    your feedback data is broken up into separate rater groups and your own self-ratings on each leadership item

    comparisons with optimal leadership profiles, as indicated by research studies, are also presented in each of

    these first two sections

    Look through the report when you are not distracted by other things. Don't discuss the report with anybody

    until you have had the opportunity to review it with your development coach. This process helps you to

    access the information contained in this report accurately and to accommodate this feedback in the best way

    possible.

    Do not just compare yourself with "the norms" !they can be sub-optimal! The important benchmarks are

    driven by research studies which show which leadership behaviours are most powerful in achieving the best

    outcomes with followers and associates.

    MLQ 360 MLQTeam ODQ

    7

  • 8/12/2019 Sample Australian National Report 2006

    8/43

    Sample MLQ Report

    3.

    a) My leadership strengths?

    (What strengths do others see in you that you already knew?)

    b)

    (What strengths do others see in you that you didn't know?)

    c) Areas where I need to develop my leadership behaviours:

    (What weaknesses do others see in you that you already knew?)

    d) Specific leadership behaviour items I need to do more frequently:

    e) Specific behaviour items I need to do less frequently:

    f) Areas where I see myself as being stronger than I am perceived to be by others:

    g) How can I be a more effective leader with my followers?

    h) How can I be a more effective leader with my peers?

    I) How can I influence "upwards" more effectively?

    j) What issues really challenge my thinking about my leadership?

    k) How do I sometimes engage in "self-talk" which is unhelpful to me as a leader?

    Now focus on the Transformational Leadership sections.

    l) What are my strongest transformational leadership behaviours? How can I leverage those behaviours?

    m)

    n)

    o)

    Areas where I tend notto perceive myself as having leadership strengths, but where my raters see me as

    having strengths:

    What transformational leadership behaviours are most important for me to improve given my current role in

    the organisation and the surrounding environment?

    Look at the balance between your observed positive Rewards Achievements (CR) behaviours and your

    Monitors Mistakes (MBEA) behaviours. Do you practice CR more frequently than MBEA, and if not why not?

    Do you rely too much on these transactional influencing behaviours when compared with your

    transformational influencing repertoire?

    Notice how frequently you are seen to be engaging in MBE-P and LF behaviours. Consider whether you need

    to pay more attention to this perception by others since it is a de-motivator for them. How could you get

    feedback about what others think is important but which they think you "miss" or simply "react to".

    Consider the following questions "a" to "o". Attend to "a" to "f" initially, then extend to the others. Notice that

    the questions start by focusing your attention to your leadership strengths. Do not go looking for the bad

    news first! Note down any other questions or issues which may concern you.

    Making the Most of Your ReportMLQ 360 MLQTeam ODQ

    8

  • 8/12/2019 Sample Australian National Report 2006

    9/43

    Sample MLQ Report

    4.

    5.

    6.

    7.

    Making the Most of Your ReportMake some brief answers to the preceding questions and review them with your development coach. This will

    help to make your feedback review session more effective and speed up the process of establishing your

    development plan.

    A key outcome of the first session with your leadership coach is to identify both the areas of your strengths

    ("celebrating success") and a set of clear objectives for your leadership development. Each objective for

    improvement should have a particular rater level in mind. Essentially your plan will be about "more of this"

    and "less of that."

    You may notice yourself being challenged by the questions or statements and want to dispute their

    importance or meaning. It is important to remember that each question in the Multifactor Leadership

    Questionnaire is a validated marker of a full range of leadership styles. The report may therefore challenge

    you to question and refine your own implicit assumptions about leadership. This can be a fruitful area for

    reflection and discussion with your leadership coach.

    Keep perspective about your whole report and avoid getting "locked into" just one aspect of it. Your MLQ

    Profile, as a whole, is an important means by which you can improve the effectiveness of your leadership and

    ability to influence others.

    MLQ 360 MLQTeam ODQ

    9

  • 8/12/2019 Sample Australian National Report 2006

    10/43

    Sample MLQ Report

    Frequency

    Your Full-Range Leadership Profile

    Transformational Leadership

    Overall

    Frequency

    0 = Never

    1 = Once in a while2 = Sometimes

    3 = Fairly often

    4 = Frequently,

    if not alwaysTransformational Leadership

    The table below shows your aggregate ratings, including your self-rating. The average

    frequencies for this full-range of leadership styles can be interpreted with the scale to theright:

    Avg. Nota

    tall

    Onc

    ein

    a

    while

    Sometim

    es

    Fairl

    yoften

    Freq

    uently

    ,if

    notalw

    ays

    Transformational Leadership

    Overall

    How you rated yourself 1.8

    How your 25 raters rated you 2.1

    0 1 2 3 4

    Research Validated Benchmark >3.0 to

  • 8/12/2019 Sample Australian National Report 2006

    11/43

    Sample MLQ Report

    Your Full-Range Leadership Profile

    Transactional Leadership

    Rewards Achievements (CR) Avg. Nota

    tall

    Onc

    ein

    a

    while

    Sometim

    es

    Fairl

    yoften

    Freq

    uently

    ,

    ifno

    talw

    ays

    Rewards Achievements (CR)

    How you rated yourself 2.3

    How your 25 raters rated you 2.3

    0 1 2 3 4

    Research Validated Benchmark 2-3

    Monitors Mistakes (MBEA)

    How you rated yourself 1.3How your 25 raters rated you 2.5

    0 1 2 3 4

    Research Validated Benchmark 1-2

    Fights Fires (MBEP)

    How you rated yourself 0.8

    How your 25 raters rated you 1.6

    0 1 2 3 4

    Research Validated Benchmark 0-1

    Avoids Involvement (LF)

    How you rated yourself 1.0

    How your 25 raters rated you 0.9

    0 1 2 3 4

    Research Validated Benchmark 0-1

    Passive / Avoidant Behaviou

    MLQ 360 MLQTeam ODQ

    1996, 2002 by Bernard M. Bass and Bruce J. Avolio. All rights reserved. 11

  • 8/12/2019 Sample Australian National Report 2006

    12/43

    Sample MLQ Report

    Outcomes of Leadership Overview

    Extra Effort Avg. Nota

    tall

    Onc

    eina

    while

    Sometim

    es

    Fairl

    yoften

    Freq

    uen

    tly,

    ifno

    talway

    s

    Extra Effort

    How you rated yourself 1.3

    How your 25 raters rated you 1.8

    0 1 2 3 4

    Effectiveness

    How you rated yourself 2.0

    How your 25 raters rated you 2.4

    0 1 2 3 4

    Satisfaction

    How you rated yourself 1.0

    How your 25 raters rated you 2.0

    0 1 2 3 4

    The most effective leaders achieve all rater averages outcomes in excess of 3.5

    MLQ 360 MLQTeam ODQ

    1996, 2002 by Bernard M. Bass and Bruce J. Avolio. All rights reserved. 12

  • 8/12/2019 Sample Australian National Report 2006

    13/43

    Sample MLQ Report

    This section presents the average ratings given by each source for each leadership style.

    The average frequencies for this full-range of leadership styles can be interpreted with the scale below:

    Yourself

    Three Rater(s) at a Higher Organisational LevelSix Rater(s) at the Same Organisational Level

    Seven Rater(s) at a Lower Organisational Level

    Nine Rater(s) at "Other" Group

    Self & Rater Group Feedback:

    Transformational Leadership

    Standard deviation refers to the amount of variation of your raters' responses for the leadership style. 0 indicates

    complete agreement; higher numbers indicate less agreement (higher variation) in your rater's evaluation of your

    leadership behaviours.

    Your report was developed from the following number of raters providing you with feedback using the Multifactor

    Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ).

    Frequency

    0 = Never

    1 = Once in a while2 = Sometimes

    3 = Fairly often

    4 = Frequently,

    if not always

    Transformational Leadership

    Overall Avg. Nota

    tall

    Onc

    ein

    a

    while

    Sometim

    es

    Fairl

    yoften

    Freq

    uently

    ,

    ifno

    talw

    ays

    Transformational Leadership

    Overall

    Self TLS 1.8

    Higher Level TLH 2.1

    Same Level TLSL 2.0

    Lower Level TLL 1.7

    "Other" Group TLNL 2.5

    0 1 2 3 4

    Research Validated Benchmark >3.0 to

  • 8/12/2019 Sample Australian National Report 2006

    14/43

    Sample MLQ Report

    Builds Trust (IA) Avg. Nota

    tall

    Onc

    ein

    a

    while

    Sometim

    es

    Fairl

    yoften

    Freq

    uently

    ,

    ifno

    talw

    ays

    Builds Trust (IA)

    Self 1.8

    Higher Level 2.1

    Same Level 2.5

    Lower Level 1.9

    "Other" Group 2.6

    0 1 2 3 4

    All raters average 2.3

    All raters standard deviation 1.0

    Self 2.3

    Higher Level 2.6

    Same Level 2.4

    Lower Level 2.3

    "Other" Group 2.7

    0 1 2 3 4

    All raters average 2.5

    All raters standard deviation 1.0

    Self 0.8

    Higher Level 1.7

    Same Level 1.8

    Lower Level 1.7

    "Other" Group 2.7

    0 1 2 3 4

    All raters average 2.1

    All raters standard deviation 1.1

    Self 2.0

    Higher Level 1.9

    Same Level 1.3

    Lower Level 1.5

    "Other" Group 2.1

    0 1 2 3 4

    All raters average 1.7

    All raters standard deviation 1.0

    Coaches People (IC)

    Self 2.0

    Higher Level 2.4

    Same Level 1.8

    Lower Level 1.4

    "Other" Group 2.2

    0 1 2 3 4

    All raters average 1.9

    All raters standard deviation 1.1

    Encourages Innovative

    Thinking (IS)

    Acts With Integrity (IB)

    Inspires Others (IM)

    MLQ 360 MLQTeam ODQ

    1996, 2002 by Bernard M. Bass and Bruce J. Avolio. All rights reserved. 14

  • 8/12/2019 Sample Australian National Report 2006

    15/43

    Sample MLQ Report

    Self & Rater Group Feedback:

    Transactional Leadership

    Rewards Achievements (CR) Avg. Nota

    tall

    Onc

    ein

    awhile

    Sometim

    es

    Fairl

    yoften

    Freq

    uently

    ,

    ifno

    talw

    ays

    Rewards Achievements (CR)

    Self 2.3

    Higher Level 2.3

    Same Level 2.7

    Lower Level 1.8

    "Other" Group 2.5

    0 1 2 3 4

    Research Validated Benchmark 2-3.25

    All raters average 2.3

    All raters standard deviation 1.1

    Monitors Mistakes (MBEA)

    Self 1.3

    Higher Level 3.3

    Same Level 2.3

    Lower Level 2.8

    "Other" Group 2.2

    0 1 2 3 4

    Research Validated Benchmark 1-2

    All raters average 2.5

    All raters standard deviation 1.1

    MLQ 360 MLQTeam ODQ

    1996, 2002 by Bernard M. Bass and Bruce J. Avolio. All rights reserved. 15

  • 8/12/2019 Sample Australian National Report 2006

    16/43

    Sample MLQ Report

    Self & Rater Group Feedback:

    Passive / Avoidant Behaviours

    Fights Fires (MBEP) Avg. Nota

    tall

    Onc

    ein

    awhile

    Sometim

    es

    Fairl

    yoften

    Freq

    uently

    ,

    ifno

    talw

    ays

    Fights Fires (MBEP)

    Self 0.8

    Higher Level 1.3

    Same Level 2.3

    Lower Level 1.5

    "Other" Group 1.4

    0 1 2 3 4

    Research Validated Benchmark 0-1

    All raters average 1.6

    All raters standard deviation 1.2

    Avoids Involvement (LF)

    Self 1.0

    Higher Level 0.8

    Same Level 1.8

    Lower Level 0.6

    "Other" Group 0.6

    0 1 2 3 4

    Research Validated Benchmark 0-1

    All raters average 0.9

    All raters standard deviation 1.1

    MLQ 360 MLQTeam ODQ

    1996, 2002 by Bernard M. Bass and Bruce J. Avolio. All rights reserved. 16

  • 8/12/2019 Sample Australian National Report 2006

    17/43

    Sample MLQ Report

    Self & Rater Group Feedback:

    Outcomes of Your Leadership

    Extra Effort Avg. Nota

    tall

    Onc

    ein

    a

    while

    Sometim

    es

    Fairl

    yoften

    Freq

    uently

    ,

    ifno

    talw

    ays

    Extra Effort

    Self 1.3

    Higher Level 1.0

    Same Level 1.7

    Lower Level 1.7

    "Other" Group 2.2

    0 1 2 3 4

    All raters average 1.8

    All raters standard deviation 1.2

    Effectiveness

    Self 2.0

    Higher Level 2.0

    Same Level 2.0

    Lower Level 2.2

    "Other" Group 2.8

    0 1 2 3 4

    All raters average 2.4All raters standard deviation 1.1

    Satisfaction

    Self 1.0

    Higher Level 2.0

    Same Level 2.1

    Lower Level 1.6

    "Other" Group 3.1

    0 1 2 3 4

    All raters average 2.0

    All raters standard deviation 1.0

    The most effective leaders achieve all rater averages outcomes in excess of 3.5

    MLQ 360 MLQTeam ODQ

    1996, 2002 by Bernard M. Bass and Bruce J. Avolio. All rights reserved. 17

  • 8/12/2019 Sample Australian National Report 2006

    18/43

    Sample MLQ Report

    Builds Trust (IA)

    Comparison with Norms:

    Transformational Leadership

    The three charts below show how you and your raters perceived the frequency of behaviours you exhibit for each

    leadership style and organisational outcomes compared to various norms for the MLQ. Two norms are always

    provided - 'Universal' and 'National'. A third norm 'Market Segment', 'Local Organisation' or 'Previous MLQ Report' is

    provided where this is available.

    Avg. Nota

    tall

    Onc

    ein

    a

    while

    Sometim

    es

    Fairl

    yoften

    Freq

    uently

    ,

    ifno

    talw

    ays

    Builds Trust (IA)

    Self 1.8

    Your Raters 2.3

    General AUST Norms 3.0

    Professional Organisation 2.3

    Universal Norms 2.5

    0 1 2 3 4

    Acts With Integrity (IB)

    Self 2.3

    Your Raters 2.5

    General AUST Norms 2.8

    Professional Organisation 2.2

    Universal Norms 2.6

    0 1 2 3 4

    Inspires Others (IM)

    Self 0.8

    Your Raters 2.0

    General AUST Norms 3.0

    Professional Organisation 2.2

    Universal Norms 2.6

    0 1 2 3 4

    Encourages Innovative Thinking (IS)

    Self 2.0Your Raters 1.7

    General AUST Norms 2.8

    Professional Organisation 2.3

    Universal Norms 2.5

    0 1 2 3 4

    Coaches People (IC)

    Self 2.0

    Your Raters 2.0

    General AUST Norms 2.8

    Professional Organisation 2.3

    Universal Norms 2.6

    0 1 2 3 4

    MLQ 360 MLQTeam ODQ

    1996, 2002 by Bernard M. Bass and Bruce J. Avolio. All rights reserved. 18

  • 8/12/2019 Sample Australian National Report 2006

    19/43

    Sample MLQ Report

    Transactional Leadership

    Comparison with Norms:

    Transactional and Passive/Avoidant

    Rewards Achievements (CR) Avg. Nota

    tall

    Onc

    ein

    a

    while

    Sometim

    es

    Fairl

    yoften

    Freq

    uently

    ,

    ifno

    talw

    ays

    Rewards Achievements (CR)

    Self 2.3

    Your Raters 2.3

    General AUST Norms 2.9

    Professional Organisation 2.2

    Universal Norms 2.5

    0 1 2 3 4

    Monitors Mistakes (MBEA)

    Self 1.3

    Your Raters 2.7

    General AUST Norms 1.9

    Professional Organisation 1.8

    Universal Norms 1.7

    0 1 2 3 4

    Passive / Avoidant BehaviourFights Fires (MBEP)

    Self 0.8

    Your Raters 1.6

    General AUST Norms 1.0

    Professional Organisation 1.6

    Universal Norms 1.1

    0 1 2 3 4

    Avoids Involvement (LF)

    Self 1.0

    Your Raters 1.0

    General AUST Norms 0.7

    Professional Organisation 1.2

    Universal Norms 0.9

    0 1 2 3 4

    MLQ 360 MLQTeam ODQ

    1996, 2002 by Bernard M. Bass and Bruce J. Avolio. All rights reserved. 19

  • 8/12/2019 Sample Australian National Report 2006

    20/43

    Sample MLQ Report

    The effects of your leadership profile compared with other benchmarks.

    Extra Effort

    Comparison with Norms:

    Outcomes of Leadership

    Avg. Nota

    tall

    Onc

    ein

    a

    while

    Sometim

    es

    Fairl

    yoften

    Freq

    uently

    ,

    ifno

    talw

    ays

    Extra Effort

    Self 1.3

    Your Raters 1.6

    General AUST Norms 2.6

    Professional Organisation 1.8

    Universal Norms 2.6

    0 1 2 3 4

    Effectiveness

    Self 2.0

    Your Raters 2.3

    General AUST Norms 3.1

    Professional Organisation 2.3

    Universal Norms 2.6

    0 1 2 3 4

    SatisfactionSelf 1.0

    Your Raters 2.4

    General AUST Norms 3.1

    Professional Organisation 2.4

    Universal Norms 2.5

    0 1 2 3 4

    MLQ 360 MLQTeam ODQ

    1996, 2002 by Bernard M. Bass and Bruce J. Avolio. All rights reserved. 20

  • 8/12/2019 Sample Australian National Report 2006

    21/43

    Sample MLQ Report

    ite

    m

    #

    25

    ! ! !

    18

    ! !

    23

    ! ! !

    34

    ! ! !

    36

    !

    29

    ! !

    Inspires Others (IM)

    Coaches People (IC)

    Your Transformational Leadership:

    Style Strengths

    Builds Trust (IA)

    Builds Trust (IA)

    Acts With Integrity (IB)

    This section lists your Transformational Leadership strengths. The items listed below are those for which you received your six

    highest average ratings, all rater sources having been taken into account. All 20 Transformational items are ranked from top to

    bottom by average of all raters. The top six are listed below, but grouped by leadership style. The diamonds!then indicate where

    a specific source gave you a "Fairly often" rating on the Transformational leadership style. "Fairly often" is defined as greater than

    or equal to 3.0. To optimise leadership, aim for a frequency of "Fairly often" or "Frequently, if not always" rating.

    This is only an approximate first step to establishing a leadership development plan. See 'Making the Most of Your Report' and

    'Individual Planning and Developing Goals' for further suggestions.

    I go beyond self-interest for the good of

    the group

    I consider the moral and ethical

    consequences of decisions

    I display a sense of power and

    confidence

    "Oth

    er"

    Group

    I consider an individual as having

    different needs, abilities, and aspirations

    from others

    I emphasise the importance of having a

    collective sense of mission

    I express confidence that goals will be

    achieved

    Acts With Integrity (IB)

    Leadership

    Style

    High Performance

    Behaviours Self

    High

    erL

    evel

    Sam

    eLevel

    LowerL

    evel

    MLQ 360 MLQTeam ODQ

    1996, 2002 by Bernard M. Bass and Bruce J. Avolio. All rights reserved. 21

  • 8/12/2019 Sample Australian National Report 2006

    22/43

    Sample MLQ Report

    !

    Self

    This section lists Transformational Leadership areas you could develop. The items listed below are those for which you

    received your six least frequent average ratings on the Transformational leadership styles, all rater sources having been

    taken into account. All 20 Transformational items are ranked top to bottom by average of all raters. The bottom six are

    displayed below, but grouped by leadership style. The triangles "then indicate where a specific source gave you a

    "Sometimes", "Once in a while", or "Not at all" rating.

    Sam

    eLevel

    LowerL

    evel

    Your Transformational Leadership:

    Areas for Development

    "Oth

    er"

    Group

    High

    erLevel

    21

    " " " " "

    9

    " " " "

    32

    " " " " "

    30

    " " " " "

    31

    " " " " "

    15

    " " " " "

    Builds Trust (IA)

    Inspires Others (IM)

    Coaches People (IC)I spend time teaching and coaching

    Encourages Innovative Thinking

    (IS)

    Encourages Innovative Thinking

    (IS)

    Coaches People (IC)

    I talk optimistically about the future

    I help others to develop their strengths

    I act in ways that build others respect for

    me

    I suggest new ways of looking at how to

    complete assignments

    I get others to look at problems from

    many different angles

    SelfLow Frequency Behaviours

    Sam

    eLevel

    LowerL

    evel

    "Oth

    er"

    Group Leadership

    StyleHigh

    erLevel

    MLQ 360 MLQTeam ODQ

    1996, 2002 by Bernard M. Bass and Bruce J. Avolio. All rights reserved. 22

  • 8/12/2019 Sample Australian National Report 2006

    23/43

    Sample MLQ Report

    Self and Higher Level Raters

    Difference Under-estimations

    -0.33

    0.25 1

    -0.33

    -0.50 2

    -0.92

    -2.08 3

    0.08

    0.00 4

    0.08

    -0.42 5

    0.00

    0.08 6

    -2.08

    -0.92 7

    -0.50

    -0.33 8

    0.25

    -0.33 9

    The average frequencies for this full-range of leadership styles are interpreted with

    the scale to the right.

    Over-estimations

    Self to Rater Gaps

    The tables below highlight the differences in ratings between your self-frequency ratings and your raters frequency ratings of

    you, separated out by source. The bars represent the average frequency difference comparing your frequency ratings to

    those of your raters on each leadership style. The longer the bars, the greater the gaps between your perception of yourbehaviour and your raters'. When the bar is on the left, you under rate your frequency on that style. When the bar is to the

    right you over rate your frequency on that style.

    0 = Never

    1 = Once in

    a while

    2 = Sometimes

    3 = Fairly often

    4 = Frequently,

    if not always

    Fights Fires (MBEP)

    Avoids Involvement (LF)

    Builds Trust (IA)

    Frequency

    Acts With Integrity (IB)

    Monitors Mistakes (MBEA)

    Inspires Others (IM)

    Encourages Innovative Thinking (IS)

    Coaches People (IC)

    Rewards Achievements (CR)

    -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4

    ML 360 MLQTeam ODQ

    1996, 2002 by Bernard M. Bass and Bruce J. Avolio. All rights reserved. 23

  • 8/12/2019 Sample Australian National Report 2006

    24/43

    Sample MLQ Report

    Difference Under-estimations Over-estimations

    -0.8

    -0.8

    9

    -0.2

    -1.5

    8

    -1.0

    -1.0

    7

    0.7-0.5

    6

    0.2

    0.2

    5

    -0.5

    0.7

    4

    -1.0

    -1.0

    3

    -1.5

    -0.2

    2

    -0.8

    -0.8

    1

    Self and Same Level Raters

    Avoids Involvement (LF)

    Fights Fires (MBEP)

    Rewards Achievements (CR)

    Builds Trust (IA)

    Acts With Integrity (IB)

    Inspires Others (IM)

    Encourages Innovative Thinking (IS)

    Monitors Mistakes (MBEA)

    Coaches People (IC)

    -4.0 -3.0 -2.0 -1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0

    MLQ 360 MLQTeam ODQ

    1996, 2002 by Bernard M. Bass and Bruce J. Avolio. All rights reserved. 24

  • 8/12/2019 Sample Australian National Report 2006

    25/43

    Sample MLQ Report

    Self and Lower Level Raters

    Difference Under-estimations Over-estimations

    -0.1

    0.4

    9

    0.0

    -0.8

    8

    -1.0

    -1.6

    7

    0.5

    0.4

    6

    0.6

    0.6

    5

    0.4

    0.5

    4

    -1.6

    -1.0

    3

    -0.8

    0.0

    2

    0.4

    -0.1

    1

    Rewards Achievements (CR)

    Monitors Mistakes (MBEA)

    Fights Fires (MBEP)

    Avoids Involvement (LF)

    Builds Trust (IA)

    Acts With Integrity (IB)

    Inspires Others (IM)

    Encourages Innovative Thinking (IS)

    Coaches People (IC)

    -4.0 -3.0 -2.0 -1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0

    MLQ 360 MLQTeam ODQ

    1996, 2002 by Bernard M. Bass and Bruce J. Avolio. All rights reserved. 25

  • 8/12/2019 Sample Australian National Report 2006

    26/43

    Sample MLQ Report

    Self and "Other" Group Raters

    Difference Under-estimations Over-estimations

    -0.8

    0.4

    9

    -0.4

    -0.7

    8

    -1.9

    -1.0

    7

    -0.1

    -0.2

    6

    -0.2

    -0.2

    5

    -0.2

    -0.1

    4

    -1.0

    -1.9

    3

    -0.7

    -0.4

    2

    0.4

    -0.8

    1Avoids Involvement (LF)

    Coaches People (IC)

    Rewards Achievements (CR)

    Monitors Mistakes (MBEA)

    Fights Fires (MBEP)

    Encourages Innovative Thinking (IS)

    Acts With Integrity (IB)

    Inspires Others (IM)

    Builds Trust (IA)

    -4.0 -3.0 -2.0 -1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0

    MLQ 360 MLQTeam ODQ

    1996, 2002 by Bernard M. Bass and Bruce J. Avolio. All rights reserved. 26

  • 8/12/2019 Sample Australian National Report 2006

    27/43

    Sample MLQ Report

    The tables below highlight the spread of leadership ratings provided by you and your raters. The numbers are

    the frequency of each rating; the dot shows the rating you gave yourself. If there is no indication of a rating,

    the item was left blank by the rater(s) of that level.

    Complete Reporting of All Rater Responses:

    Transformational Leadership Styles

    Not

    atall

    Once

    inawhile

    Som

    etim

    es

    Fairly

    Oft

    en

    Fre

    quently

    ,if

    not

    alw

    ays

    the item was left blank by the rater(s) of that level.

    Builds Trust (IA) 0 1 2 3 4 Average10

    Self

    All Rater Average 2.2

    Rater(s) at a Higher Organisational Level 1 1 1 2.3

    Rater(s) at the Same Organisational Level 2 2 1 1 2.2

    Rater(s) at a Lower Organisational Level 2 1 4 1.3

    Rater(s) at "Other" Group 4 3 2 2.8

    18

    Self

    All Rater Average 2.5

    Rater(s) at a Higher Organisational Level 3 3.0

    Rater(s) at the Same Organisational Level 3 2 1 2.7

    Rater(s) at a Lower Organisational Level 2 1 2 1 1 1.7

    Rater(s) at "Other" Group 1 2 3 3 2.9

    21

    Self

    All Rater Average 1.6

    Rater(s) at a Higher Organisational Level 2 1 1.3

    Rater(s) at the Same Organisational Level 5 1 2.3

    Rater(s) at a Lower Organisational Level 1 5 1 1.1

    Rater(s) at "Other" Group 2 1 4 2 1.7

    25

    Self

    All Rater Average 2.9

    Rater(s) at a Higher Organisational Level 1 2 1.7

    Rater(s) at the Same Organisational Level 2 2 2 3.0

    Rater(s) at a Lower Organisational Level 2 1 4 3.3

    Rater(s) at "Other" Group 3 3 3 3.0

    Builds Trust (IA)

    I instil pride in others for being associated with me

    I display a sense of power and confidence

    I go beyond self-interest for the good of the group

    I act in ways that build others respect for me

    MLQ 360 MLQTeam ODQ

    1996, 2002 by Bernard M. Bass and Bruce J. Avolio. All rights reserved. 27

  • 8/12/2019 Sample Australian National Report 2006

    28/43

    Sample MLQ Report

    Notatall

    Onc

    ein

    awhile

    Som

    etim

    es

    FairlyOfte

    n

    Fre

    que

    ntly

    ,ifno

    t

    alw

    ays

    Acts With Integrity (IB) 0 1 2 3 4 Average6

    Self

    All Rater Average 2.0

    Rater(s) at a Higher Organisational Level 1 2 2.7

    Rater(s) at the Same Organisational Level 1 2 1 1 1 1.8

    Rater(s) at a Lower Organisational Level 1 2 1 3 1.9

    Rater(s) at "Other" Group 2 3 3 2.1

    14

    Self

    All Rater Average 2.2

    Rater(s) at a Higher Organisational Level 1 2 2.7

    Rater(s) at the Same Organisational Level 1 1 2 2 1.8

    Rater(s) at a Lower Organisational Level

    1 2 3 1 1.7

    Rater(s) at "Other" Group 4 3 1 2.6

    23

    Self

    All Rater Average 2.9

    Rater(s) at a Higher Organisational Level 1 1 1 3.0

    Rater(s) at the Same Organisational Level 1 2 3 3.3

    Rater(s) at a Lower Organisational Level 2 2 1 2 2.4

    Rater(s) at "Other" Group 3 3 2 2.9

    34

    Self

    All Rater Average 2.8

    Rater(s) at a Higher Organisational Level 1 2 2.0

    Rater(s) at the Same Organisational Level 1 2 1 2 2.7

    Rater(s) at a Lower Organisational Level 1 1 2 3 3.0

    Rater(s) at "Other" Group 2 5 2 3.0

    Acts With Integrity (IB)

    I specify the importance of having a strong sense of purpose

    I consider the moral and ethical consequences of decisions

    I emphasise the importance of having a collective sense of mission

    I talk about my most important values and beliefs

    MLQ 360 MLQTeam ODQ

    1996, 2002 by Bernard M. Bass and Bruce J. Avolio. All rights reserved. 28

  • 8/12/2019 Sample Australian National Report 2006

    29/43

    Sample MLQ Report

    Notatall

    Onc

    ein

    awhile

    Som

    etim

    es

    FairlyOfte

    n

    Fre

    que

    ntly

    ,ifno

    t

    alw

    ays

    Inspires Others (IM) 0 1 2 3 4 Average9

    Self

    All Rater Average 1.8

    Rater(s) at a Higher Organisational Level 2 1 1.3

    Rater(s) at the Same Organisational Level 4 2 1.3

    Rater(s) at a Lower Organisational Level 2 2 2 1 1.3

    Rater(s) at "Other" Group 4 3 2 2.8

    13

    Self

    All Rater Average 2.1

    Rater(s) at a Higher Organisational Level 2 1 2.3

    Rater(s) at the Same Organisational Level 1 2 1 2 1.7

    Rater(s) at a Lower Organisational Level

    1 3 2 1 1.9

    Rater(s) at "Other" Group 1 2 5 2.5

    26

    Self

    All Rater Average 1.9

    Rater(s) at a Higher Organisational Level 1 2 1.3

    Rater(s) at the Same Organisational Level 1 2 2 1 1.7

    Rater(s) at a Lower Organisational Level 2 2 1 1 1 1.6

    Rater(s) at "Other" Group 1 4 1 2 2.5

    36

    Self

    All Rater Average 2.4

    Rater(s) at a Higher Organisational Level 1 2 1.7

    Rater(s) at the Same Organisational Level 5 1 2.3

    Rater(s) at a Lower Organisational Level 1 1 2 2 1 2.1

    Rater(s) at "Other" Group 2 4 2 3.0

    I express confidence that goals will be achieved

    I talk optimistically about the future

    Inspires Others (IM)

    I talk enthusiastically about what needs to be accomplished

    I articulate a compelling vision of the future

    MLQ 360 MLQTeam ODQ

    1996, 2002 by Bernard M. Bass and Bruce J. Avolio. All rights reserved. 29

  • 8/12/2019 Sample Australian National Report 2006

    30/43

    Sample MLQ Report

    Not

    atall

    Once

    inawhile

    Som

    etim

    es

    Fairly

    Oft

    en

    Fre

    quently

    ,if

    not

    alw

    ays

    Encourages Innovative Thinking (IS) 0 1 2 3 4 Average2

    Self

    All Rater Average 2.0

    Rater(s) at a Higher Organisational Level 1 2 2.3

    Rater(s) at the Same Organisational Level 1 2 1 1 1 1.8

    Rater(s) at a Lower Organisational Level 1 2 2 1 1.5

    Rater(s) at "Other" Group 1 3 4 2.4

    8

    Self

    All Rater Average 1.7

    Rater(s) at a Higher Organisational Level 1 1 1 2.0

    Rater(s) at the Same Organisational Level 1 2 3 1.3

    Rater(s) at a Lower Organisational Level 1 2 3 1 1.6

    Rater(s) at "Other" Group 1 1 4 3 2.0

    30

    Self

    All Rater Average 1.6

    Rater(s) at a Higher Organisational Level 1 1 1 2.0

    Rater(s) at the Same Organisational Level 2 3 1 1.0

    Rater(s) at a Lower Organisational Level 2 1 2 2 1.6

    Rater(s) at "Other" Group 1 6 1 2.0

    32

    Self

    All Rater Average 1.5

    Rater(s) at a Higher Organisational Level 2 1 1.3

    Rater(s) at the Same Organisational Level 1 4 1 1.0

    Rater(s) at a Lower Organisational Level 1 4 1 1 1.3

    Rater(s) at "Other" Group 2 5 1 1 2.1

    I get others to look at problems from many different angles

    I suggest new ways of looking at how to complete assignments

    Encourages Innovative Thinking (IS)I re-examine critical assumptions to question whether they are

    appropriate

    I seek differing perspectives when solving problems

    MLQ 360 MLQTeam ODQ

    1996, 2002 by Bernard M. Bass and Bruce J. Avolio. All rights reserved. 30

  • 8/12/2019 Sample Australian National Report 2006

    31/43

    Sample MLQ Report

    Not

    atall

    Once

    inawhile

    Som

    etim

    es

    Fairly

    Oft

    en

    Fre

    quently

    ,if

    not

    alw

    ays

    Coaches People (IC) 0 1 2 3 4 Average15

    Self

    All Rater Average 1.4

    Rater(s) at a Higher Organisational Level 2 1 2.3

    Rater(s) at the Same Organisational Level 4 1 1.4

    Rater(s) at a Lower Organisational Level 4 1 1 1 0.9

    Rater(s) at "Other" Group 2 2 4 1 1.4

    19

    Self

    All Rater Average 2.2

    Rater(s) at a Higher Organisational Level 1 2 2.7

    Rater(s) at the Same Organisational Level 2 2 1 1 2.2

    Rater(s) at a Lower Organisational Level 1 3 1 1 1 1.7

    Rater(s) at "Other" Group 1 3 3 1 2.5

    29

    Self

    All Rater Average 2.5

    Rater(s) at a Higher Organisational Level 2 1 3.3

    Rater(s) at the Same Organisational Level 3 2 1 2.2

    Rater(s) at a Lower Organisational Level 2 2 2 1 2.0

    Rater(s) at "Other" Group 1 1 5 1 2.8

    31

    Self

    All Rater Average 1.6

    Rater(s) at a Higher Organisational Level 1 1 1 1.3

    Rater(s) at the Same Organisational Level 4 2 1.3

    Rater(s) at a Lower Organisational Level 3 1 2 1 1.1

    Rater(s) at "Other" Group 2 4 2 1 2.2

    I spend time teaching and coaching

    I treat others as individuals rather than just as a member of a group

    I consider an individual as having different needs, abilities, and

    aspirations from others

    Coaches People (IC)

    I help others to develop their strengths

    MLQ 360 MLQTeam ODQ

    1996, 2002 by Bernard M. Bass and Bruce J. Avolio. All rights reserved. 31

  • 8/12/2019 Sample Australian National Report 2006

    32/43

    Sample MLQ Report

    Complete Reporting of All Rater Responses:

    Transactional Leadership Detail

    Notatall

    Onc

    ein

    awhile

    Som

    etim

    es

    FairlyOften

    Fre

    que

    ntly,

    ifno

    t

    alw

    ays

    Rewards Achievements (CR) 0 1 2 3 4 Average1

    Self

    All Rater Average 2.5

    Rater(s) at a Higher Organisational Level 2 1 2.7

    Rater(s) at the Same Organisational Level 1 3 2 3.2

    Rater(s) at a Lower Organisational Level 1 4 2 2.1

    Rater(s) at "Other" Group 1 4 3 1 2.3

    11

    Self

    All Rater Average 2.6

    Rater(s) at a Higher Organisational Level 1 1 1 2.3

    Rater(s) at the Same Organisational Level 1 1 3 1 2.7

    Rater(s) at a Lower Organisational Level 2 1 3 1 2.4

    Rater(s) at "Other" Group 1 3 3 2 2.7

    16

    Self

    All Rater Average 1.5

    Rater(s) at a Higher Organisational Level 2 1 2.0

    Rater(s) at the Same Organisational Level 2 1 2 1 2.3

    Rater(s) at a Lower Organisational Level 4 2 1 0.6

    Rater(s) at "Other" Group 2 2 1 3 1.6

    35

    Self

    All Rater Average 2.7

    Rater(s) at a Higher Organisational Level 1 1 1 2.0

    Rater(s) at the Same Organisational Level 1 2 1 2 2.7

    Rater(s) at a Lower Organisational Level 1 1 2 2 1 2.1

    Rater(s) at "Other" Group 6 3 3.3

    I express satisfaction when others meet expectations

    I discuss in specific terms who is responsible for achievingperformance targets

    I make clear what one can expect to receive when performance goals

    are achieved

    I provide others with assistance in exchange for their efforts

    Rewards Achievements (CR)

    MLQ 360 MLQTeam ODQ

    1996, 2002 by Bernard M. Bass and Bruce J. Avolio. All rights reserved. 32

  • 8/12/2019 Sample Australian National Report 2006

    33/43

    Sample MLQ Report

    Not

    atall

    Once

    inawhile

    Som

    etim

    es

    Fairly

    Oft

    en

    Fre

    quently

    ,if

    not

    alw

    ays

    Monitors Mistakes (MBEA) 0 1 2 3 4 Average4

    Self

    All Rater Average 2.9

    Rater(s) at a Higher Organisational Level 3 4.0

    Rater(s) at the Same Organisational Level 2 3 1 2.8

    Rater(s) at a Lower Organisational Level 2 3 2 3.0

    Rater(s) at "Other" Group 1 4 2 2 2.6

    22

    Self

    All Rater Average 2.6

    Rater(s) at a Higher Organisational Level1 1 1 3.0

    Rater(s) at the Same Organisational Level 2 1 2 1 2.3

    Rater(s) at a Lower Organisational Level 1 1 1 4 2.7

    Rater(s) at "Other" Group 2 2 4 1 2.4

    24

    Self

    All Rater Average 2.3

    Rater(s) at a Higher Organisational Level 2 1 3.3

    Rater(s) at the Same Organisational Level 1 2 1 2 1.7

    Rater(s) at a Lower Organisational Level 1 2 3 1 2.6

    Rater(s) at "Other" Group 1 2 2 3 1 2.1

    27

    Self

    All Rater Average 2.4

    Rater(s) at a Higher Organisational Level 1 2 3.0

    Rater(s) at the Same Organisational Level 2 1 3 2.2

    Rater(s) at a Lower Organisational Level 1 1 2 3 3.0

    Rater(s) at "Other" Group 3 3 2 1.9

    I keep track of all mistakes

    I direct my attention toward failures to meet standards

    Monitors Mistakes (MBEA)

    I focus attention on irregularities, mistakes, exceptions, and

    deviations from standards

    I concentrate my full attention on dealing with mistakes, complaints,

    and failures

    MLQ 360 MLQTeam ODQ

    1996, 2002 by Bernard M. Bass and Bruce J. Avolio. All rights reserved. 33

  • 8/12/2019 Sample Australian National Report 2006

    34/43

    Sample MLQ Report

    Complete Reporting of All Rater Responses:

    Passive / Avoidant Behaviours Detail

    Notatall

    Onc

    ein

    awhile

    Som

    etim

    es

    FairlyOften

    Fre

    que

    ntly,

    ifno

    t

    alw

    ays

    Fights Fires (MBEP) 0 1 2 3 4 Average3

    Self

    All Rater Average 1.5

    Rater(s) at a Higher Organisational Level 2 1 0.3

    Rater(s) at the Same Organisational Level 1 4 1 2.2

    Rater(s) at a Lower Organisational Level 3 1 1 1 1.0

    Rater(s) at "Other" Group 2 2 2 3 1.7

    12

    Self

    All Rater Average 1.9

    Rater(s) at a Higher Organisational Level 1 1 1 1.7

    Rater(s) at the Same Organisational Level 1 2 2 1 2.3

    Rater(s) at a Lower Organisational Level 2 1 2 2 2.3

    Rater(s) at "Other" Group 2 3 3 1 1.3

    17

    Self

    All Rater Average 1.8

    Rater(s) at a Higher Organisational Level 1 2 1.3

    Rater(s) at the Same Organisational Level 1 2 2 1 2.3

    Rater(s) at a Lower Organisational Level 3 1 2 1.5

    Rater(s) at "Other" Group 2 6 1.8

    20

    Self

    All Rater Average 1.4

    Rater(s) at a Higher Organisational Level 1 2 1.7

    Rater(s) at the Same Organisational Level 1 1 1 2 1 2.2

    Rater(s) at a Lower Organisational Level 2 2 2 1 1.3

    Rater(s) at "Other" Group 3 3 2 0.9

    Fights Fires (MBEP)

    I fail to interfere until problems become serious

    I wait for things to go wrong before taking action

    I show that I am a firm believer in If it aint broke, dont fix it.

    I demonstrate that problems must become chronic before I take

    action

    MLQ 360 MLQTeam ODQ

    1996, 2002 by Bernard M. Bass and Bruce J. Avolio. All rights reserved. 34

  • 8/12/2019 Sample Australian National Report 2006

    35/43

    Sample MLQ Report

    Notatall

    Onc

    ein

    awhile

    Som

    etim

    es

    FairlyOfte

    n

    Fre

    que

    ntly

    ,ifno

    t

    alw

    ays

    Avoids Involvement (LF) 0 1 2 3 4 Average5

    Self

    All Rater Average 1.0

    Rater(s) at a Higher Organisational Level 2 1 1.0

    Rater(s) at the Same Organisational Level 1 2 3 2.2

    Rater(s) at a Lower Organisational Level 6 1 0.6

    Rater(s) at "Other" Group 6 2 1 0.4

    7

    Self

    All Rater Average 0.6

    Rater(s) at a Higher Organisational Level 3 0.0

    Rater(s) at the Same Organisational Level 3 1 1 1 1.0

    Rater(s) at a Lower Organisational Level

    4 2 1 0.7

    Rater(s) at "Other" Group 5 4 0.4

    28

    Self

    All Rater Average 1.3

    Rater(s) at a Higher Organisational Level 1 2 2.0

    Rater(s) at the Same Organisational Level 1 1 4 2.5

    Rater(s) at a Lower Organisational Level 5 1 1 0.9

    Rater(s) at "Other" Group 5 2 2 0.7

    33

    Self

    All Rater Average 0.8

    Rater(s) at a Higher Organisational Level 3 0.0

    Rater(s) at the Same Organisational Level 1 2 2 1 1.7

    Rater(s) at a Lower Organisational Level 4 3 0.4

    Rater(s) at "Other" Group 4 3 2 0.8

    I am absent when needed

    I avoid making decisions

    I delay responding to urgent questions

    Avoids Involvement (LF)

    I avoid getting involved when important issues arise

    MLQ 360 MLQTeam ODQ

    1996, 2002 by Bernard M. Bass and Bruce J. Avolio. All rights reserved. 35

  • 8/12/2019 Sample Australian National Report 2006

    36/43

    Sample MLQ Report

    Complete Reporting of All Rater Responses:

    Outcomes of Leadership

    Not

    atall

    Onc

    ein

    aw

    hile

    Som

    etim

    es

    Fairly

    Often

    Fre

    que

    ntly,ifnot

    alw

    ays

    Extra Effort 0 1 2 3 4 Average39

    Self

    All Rater Average 1.6

    Rater(s) at a Higher Organisational Level 2 1 0.7

    Rater(s) at the Same Organisational Level 2 3 1.2

    Rater(s) at a Lower Organisational Level 1 3 2 1 1.9

    Rater(s) at "Other" Group 3 5 1 1.9

    42

    Self

    All Rater Average 1.9

    Rater(s) at a Higher Organisational Level 1 1 1 1.3

    Rater(s) at the Same Organisational Level 1 2 1 1 1 1.8

    Rater(s) at a Lower Organisational Level 2 2 1 2 1.7

    Rater(s) at "Other" Group 1 5 2 1 2.3

    44

    Self

    All Rater Average 1.9

    Rater(s) at a Higher Organisational Level 1 1 1 1.0

    Rater(s) at the Same Organisational Level 3 1 1 1 2.0

    Rater(s) at a Lower Organisational Level 2 1 2 2 1.6

    Rater(s) at "Other" Group 2 3 3 1 2.3

    I get others to do more than they expected to do

    I heighten others desire to succeed

    I increase others willingness to try harder

    Extra Effort

    MLQ 360 MLQTeam ODQ

    1996, 2002 by Bernard M. Bass and Bruce J. Avolio. All rights reserved. 36

  • 8/12/2019 Sample Australian National Report 2006

    37/43

  • 8/12/2019 Sample Australian National Report 2006

    38/43

    Sample MLQ Report

    Notatall

    Onc

    ein

    awhile

    Som

    etim

    es

    FairlyOfte

    n

    Fre

    que

    ntly

    ,ifno

    t

    alw

    ays

    Satisfaction 0 1 2 3 4 Average38

    Self

    All Rater Average 1.5

    Rater(s) at a Higher Organisational Level 3 1.0

    Rater(s) at the Same Organisational Level 3 2 1.4

    Rater(s) at a Lower Organisational Level 3 1 1 2 1.3

    Rater(s) at "Other" Group 2 5 2 1.8

    41

    Self

    All Rater Average 2.5

    Rater(s) at a Higher Organisational Level 1 1 1 3.0

    Rater(s) at the Same Organisational Level 2 3 1 2.8

    Rater(s) at a Lower Organisational Level

    1 2 1 3 1.9

    Rater(s) at "Other" Group 1 2 3 2 2.8

    I use methods of leadership that are satisfying

    I work with others in a satisfactory way

    Satisfaction

    MLQ 360 MLQTeam ODQ

    1996, 2002 by Bernard M. Bass and Bruce J. Avolio. All rights reserved. 38

  • 8/12/2019 Sample Australian National Report 2006

    39/43

    Sample MLQ Report

    Open-ended Question ": Responses

    What I admire most about Sample MLQ

    Report's leadership is -

    The rater comments below are provided unedited and do not represent any

    order of relative importance.

    MLQ 360 MLQTeam ODQ

    1996, 2002 by Bernard M. Bass and Bruce J. Avolio. All rights reserved. 39

  • 8/12/2019 Sample Australian National Report 2006

    40/43

    Sample MLQ Report

    Open-ended Question 2: Responses

    One thing that gets in the way of

    Sample MLQ Report's effectiveness is -

    The rater comments below are provided unedited and do not represent any

    order of relative importance.

    MLQ 360 MLQTeam ODQ

    1996, 2002 by Bernard M. Bass and Bruce J. Avolio. All rights reserved. 40

  • 8/12/2019 Sample Australian National Report 2006

    41/43

    Sample MLQ Report

    Open-ended Question 3: Responses

    The rater comments below are provided unedited and do not represent any

    order of relative importance.

    What are two or three things

    that would help Sample MLQ Report be more

    effective as a leader?

    MLQ 360 MLQTeam ODQ

    1996, 2002 by Bernard M. Bass and Bruce J. Avolio. All rights reserved. 41

  • 8/12/2019 Sample Australian National Report 2006

    42/43

    Sample MLQ Report

    i.

    ii.

    iii.

    iv.

    v.

    vi.

    vii.

    viii.

    ix.

    Individual Planning and Goal Setting

    The MLQ uncovers where you have strengths and areas for development as determined by leading

    research into optimal outcomes for followers and associates. The following generic points are useful in

    responding to your report and determining a plan for your future development:

    Accept the ratings as revealing how others perceive your exercise of leadership behaviours that

    really count in influencing others for better or worse.

    Consider the outcomes of your leadership style at present. Know that transformational behaviours

    relate strongly to extra effort in particular.

    Where appropriate share your plan with trusted people who can help you with feedback,

    suggestions and encouragement. Consider working with a professional coach - either internally or

    externally to help you achieve these goals. Routinely seek and review feedback from these people.

    Avoid putting raters "on the spot" about their ratings or giving them the impression that you know

    what they may have said. Such behaviour undermines confidence in the whole process. Leaders

    have to manage other's fantasies as well as the reality.

    Consider setting a time when you will review your progress by repeating an MLQ.

    Carefully examine agreements and disagreements between your self and others' ratings, as well as

    differences between raters within and between groups. These differences can be the result of a

    number of different factors.

    Compare your ratings with the benchmarks indicated by research, and not just with norms. Knowing

    you are 'above' or 'below average' is often not very helpful for developmental purposes.

    Explore your implicit leadership model or theories with colleagues and your facilitator. Use the Full

    Range Leadership Model to tune up your own ideas of effective leadership.

    Develop a plan based on increasing or decreasing your behaviours on particular items in the MLQ,

    not just on the ideas of the nine leadership styles. Pick items which will have the biggest effect on

    your overall average for a particular style and to which you can visualise yourself committing with

    your followers or associates.

    MLQ 360 MLQTeam ODQ

    42

  • 8/12/2019 Sample Australian National Report 2006

    43/43

    Sample MLQ Report

    Based on information I've received from my MLQ feedback, here are two or three specific

    developmental goals:

    Actions I will take to improve my effectiveness:

    Act ion Expected Outcome Timeframe

    How I will monitor my progress?

    Resources or support I need to achieve my development plan:

    Individual Planning and Goal Setting

    MLQ 360 MLQTeam ODQ