sabic case

53
PART - I: INTRODUCTION This study shows this experience with a complete study of improving the competitiveness of Sabic against its competitors from a marketing perspective. PART – II: SAUDI BASIC INDUSTRIES CROP. 2.1 Sabic In this section, the focus is paid to discuss the whole picture of Sabic and how its subsidies work together to compete highly in the market and to stand as one unit. Because of that, this section discusses four parts. The first one is the history of Sabic. The second one is the companies working under Sabic. The third one is the global planning for the corporation. Finally, the fourth one is the current situation of Sabic. History o Sabic was established in 1976. 1

Upload: ameerah-sa

Post on 26-Nov-2014

174 views

Category:

Documents


6 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Sabic Case

PART - I: INTRODUCTION

This study shows this experience with a complete study of improving the

competitiveness of Sabic against its competitors from a marketing

perspective.

PART – II: SAUDI BASIC INDUSTRIES CROP.

2.1 Sabic

In this section, the focus is paid to discuss the whole picture of Sabic and

how its subsidies work together to compete highly in the market and to stand

as one unit. Because of that, this section discusses four parts. The first one is

the history of Sabic. The second one is the companies working under Sabic.

The third one is the global planning for the corporation. Finally, the fourth

one is the current situation of Sabic.

History o Sabic was established in 1976.

o It was established to widen the economic base of Saudi Arabia and to use the oil wealth

of the Kingdom in petrochemical industries instead of selling it as row material.

o Sabic has petrochemical industries, fertilizers, iron and steel, aluminum, other

hydrocarbon-based industries, construction of projects for supplying Sabic with its needs

of raw materials and marketing of products inside Saudi Arabia and abroad.

o Every now and then Sabic is adding a new development to its organizations to increase

their potentials.

Global o Sabic used some alliance with others to penetrate the market.

1

Page 2: Sabic Case

Planning o Because of the low cost production, Sabic can compete highly in these foreign markets

such as the European market and the American markets.

o The trade restrictions that face this expansion of Sabic's operation can be overcame by

the a number of treaties with the European countries and the TWO.

o Penetrating these markets will give Sabic the potential that it plans and look for.

Current

Situation

o The current situation of Sabic is to gain more knowledge and experience.

o That is because Sabic wants to compete in the global markets not from the price

prospective only but from the quality.

o This look is applicable because there have been established many training centers that

increased the potential of the workers, engineers and management of the different Sabic

companies.

Companies Under Sabic

Percentage of Sabic Name of Company

100% Arabian Petrochemicals Co. (PETROKEMYA)

Saudi Iron and Steel Co. (HADEED)

SABIC Industrial Investment Co.

SABIC Luxemburg

SABIC Asia Pacific,SABIC Antlizan

More than 50% Al-Jubail United Petrochemicals Co. (UNITED) 75%

2

Page 3: Sabic Case

National Chemical Fertilizers (Ibn Baytar) 71.5%

National Gases Co. (GAS) 70%

Saudi European Petrochemicals Co. (Ibn Zahr) 70%

Arabia Synthetic Fibers Co. (Ibn Rushd) 53.9%

50% Saudi Methanol Co. (AR-RAZI)

Al-Jubail Fertilizers Co. (SAMAD)

Saudi Yanbu Petrochemicals Co. (YANPET)

National Methanol Co. (Ibn Sina)

Saudi Petrochemicals Co. (SADAF)

Eastern Petrochemicals Co. (SHARQ)

Al-Jubail Petrochemicals Co. (KEMYA)

Less than 50% Saudi Arabian Fertilizers Co. (SAFCO) 42.99%.

2.2 Products

In 1983 Sabic started production of Methanol with a capacity of 600,000

tons/year. After 15 years, SABIC has now 15 plants, producing 40

petrochemical products, as well as metals and industrial gases. The total

design capacity of Sabic’s petrochemical plants is 21.5 million tons per year,

and the design capacity of the plants for metals and industrial gases are 2.9

3

Page 4: Sabic Case

million tons per year and 1.2 million tons per year respectively. (The Saudi

net)

Sabic produced 25.3 million metric tons of chemicals, fertilizers, plastic

resins, metals and gases in 1998, up from the previous year's total of 23.7

million metric tons. Of that amount, 19.4 million metric tons were marketed

worldwide. Sabic has embarked on a massive expansion program aimed at

increasing output to about 35 million tons by 2002. (The Saudi net)

The industry is also turning its attention to plants that manufacture higher

value-added intermediate products such as fiber intermediates, industrial

gases, and plastics. The plastics industry has seen tremendous growth. In

1993, SABIC produced 1.6 million metric tons of plastics; by 1998, plastics

production had grown to 2.6 million metric tons and is projected to grow to

over 4 million mt by 2003. (The Saudi net)

2.3 Market

One of the most important markets that the petrochemical industry looks to

fulfill is the local market. This is because of two things. First of all, there are

a lot of present industries that depend entirely on petrochemical products.

The second is that the petrochemical industry is opening the door for any

future industry that could depend on their products.

In addition to the local market, there are the international markets. There are

two main markets of the petrochemical industry. The first one is Europe

which is a promising one but because it has some industries, the Saudi

4

Page 5: Sabic Case

products are facing some trade barrier from the European countries. The

second market is the one in Southeast Asian countries. This is the largest

market because of there are many plants and factories in these countries that

depend on the petrochemical products. Also, the petrochemical products in

these countries are small compared to their needs.

2.4 Organizational Chart

5

Page 6: Sabic Case

6

Page 7: Sabic Case

PART – III: TECHNICAL STUDY

3.1 Introduction

In this chapter, the technical part consists of three parts. The first one is a

literature review which is about creating value and core competency,

porter’s five competitive forces, corporate social responsibility and the last

one is about the balance scorecard. After that, the analysis of Sabic is done

by using SWOT and Porter’s five forces. Finally, the discussion is presented

at the end.

3.2: Literature Review

7

Page 8: Sabic Case

3.2.1 Creating Value and Core Competency

One of the most important steps to make a successful business in highly

competitive environment is by creating value. When the industry

successfully creates real-value, then it will earn higher return than others.

Therefore, any decision must to support creating –real value. There are three

points that will create real-value for industries. These three points are as the

following:

1- Being different: the industry should have unique product, superior

reputation for service and/or quality and meeting and exceeding the

customers need.

2- Being hard to imitate: since competitors will mimic the industry, the

industry should be different from others. This can be done by being

the first in producing a certain product or service, having a better

location, having a brand name and building strong reputation.

3- Continuous improvement: the industry must continuously develop its

products and services and its core competency. (Innovation, 2005)

Core competency can be gained buy having these three points:

1. Potential access to a wide variety of markets - the core competency

must be capable of developing new products and services

2. A core competency must make a significant contribution to the

perceived benefits of the end product.

8

Page 9: Sabic Case

3. Core Competencies should be difficult for competitors to imitate. In

many industries, such competencies are likely to be unique

(wikipedia, 2007)

3.2.2 Porter’s Five Competitive Forces

The industry should have the ability to compete locally, domically and

internationally. In order to reach this point, it should have the five

competitive forces that determine industry competition. These five forces are

as the following:

1- The threat of new entries

2- Bargaining power of buyer

3- Bargaining power of suppliers

4- Threat of substitute products of services

5- Rivalry among existing competition (Porter, 1990)

9

Page 10: Sabic Case

In order to improve the position of the industry, the industry should have the

ability to compete and that lead to competitive advantages. Industries should

have competitive advantages which can be gained by:

1. Lower cost: design, produce and market a comparable product

better than other competitors.

2. Differentiation: the ability to provide unique and superior value

to the buyer in terms of products quality, special features, or

after sale services.

3. Competitive scope: the industry must be clear in terms of range

of products, distribution channels, the type of buyers it will

serves, the geographical area it will cover and the related

industries it will need. (Porter, 1990)

3.2.3 Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

In the past few years, there are many new concepts that have been

introduced in the world of business organizations. Most of these new

concepts are done for one of two purposes or both. The first one is to

differentiate the business from others and the second one is to face the

growing level of competition locally and internationally. One of these

old/new concepts that are revived is the corporate social responsibility

(CSR). (Pearce, 2003)

Globally, there are many corporations that are paying much attention for

corporate social responsibility. This is because these corporation feel that thy

have obligation towards their environment, society and stakeholders (Teach,

10

Page 11: Sabic Case

2005). There are many types and because of that, they can be divided into

three types. These three types are as follows:

1. Generic social issues. This type doesn’t affect the business in any way

since it does not affect the business, suppliers, distributors or

customers.

2. Value chain impact. This type has a direct impact on the business and

it could affect the company positively or negatively.

3. Competitive context. These aspects of the social environment that

constrain the productivity of the business in its operating locations.

For example, when the business build hospitals, training centers or

schools, may affect the competitiveness of companies that depend on

the domestic workforce. (Alfonso, 2005)

One could ask, what is the real importance of corporate social

responsibility? Actually, the importance is strong enough to make many

corporations to seek program suiting this area. There are four important

points of CSR. These four points are as the following:

1. Reputation. The process of building the brand name is one of the most

important points that all corporations are looking for. By using CSR,

the building of the brand name becomes easy.

2. Retention and recruitment. All talented employees who have strong

experience look for position in such strong corporations. Therefore,

CSR attracts these talented people.

3. Operational efficiencies. CSR improves the utilization of materials

and it minimizes the wastes especially in cases when the pollution.

11

Page 12: Sabic Case

4. Increased sales. People tend to buy from such organizations that have

CSR programs more than they do from their competitors. (Alfonso,

2005)

3.2.4 The Balanced Scorecard

The Balanced Scorecard is a strategic management tool that was formed in

1992 by Robert Kaplan and David Norton to measure performance and to

link strategies with short-run plans. (Ettore, 2005)

The reason for using the balanced score cards is because they show and

implement the organizational strategies, enabling to update the strategies

according to reality, enhancing communication (vertically and horizontally),

linking divisional goals with the organization’s goals and strategies, linking

short-run plans with long-run plans and linking performance evaluations and

measurement with long-term strategies. (Pineno, 2004)

Balanced scorecards are connected with these goals by four areas. The first

one is that balanced scorecards are able to translate the vision, communicate

and linking, business plans and feedback and learning. The importance of

using scorecards is that because it is one of the few managerial tools that can

be used to view performance in several areas simultaneously. This is a

difficult task because of the complexity of running the business these days

because of the strong competition that is raising everyday in all industries.

(Ettore, 2005)

12

Page 13: Sabic Case

However, in order to use the balanced score cards, they must by fully known

by employees and managers in the organization. Even when the managers

understand the importance of measuring performance and finding methods

for linking the measurements with the strategies of the organization, the

employees should also have this knowledge. (Pineno, 2004)

3.3 Statement of the Problems

The competition that is growing in the petrochemical sector in the regional

and international markets has put strong pressure on Sabic to make strategies

for facing this competition. As noticed from the figure below, it is obvious

that the major petrochemical companies are merging to face the growing

competition in the international markets. Sabic represents a case in which it

depends on its resources. This merging will increase the market share of

these international companies and that will affect the market share of Sabic.

Therefore, the purpose of the research is to improve the competitiveness of

Sabic vs. International and regional petrochemical companies.

13

Page 14: Sabic Case

3.4 Objectives

There are many products that Sabic produce which has been explained in the

previous part. Because my coop training program was done Urea unit, the

focus of this study is on the market of urea. Therefore, the objectives of this

study are as the following:

To evaluate Sabic petrochemical industry

To analyze the global market of Urea

To analyze the competition of

To analyze the performance of Sabic in face of its competitors

3.5 Methodology

14

Page 15: Sabic Case

The research is based on primary information that is collected from various

well-known articles and studies. In addition, the research will use the

analysis based on the Porter’s five competitive forces to evaluates the

competitiveness of Sabic in the Urea market.

3.6 Marketing Analysis

3.6.1. SWOT Analysis

INTERNALStrengths Weaknesses

Increasing the number of employment in Saudi Arabia

Supplying the local market of the raw materials

The petrochemical industry highly contributing to the

economy of Saudi Arabia: training and economic base.

The oil and gas production prices are low, and therefore,

the production of chemical products is cheaper than

others.

The quaintly of oil and gas in Saudi Arabia is huge and it

can use as feedstock for the petrochemical industry

processed by Sabic.

The location of Saudi Arabia is critical since it is near of

all of its major customers.

The location of the petrochemical industry helps in

supplying its customers. The location of Yanbu serves

Africa, Europe and the USA and the locations Jubail

services Asia and Australia.

This sector is using the latest techniques, concepts, tools

and requirements because it is flexible to adopt new

changes

• Governmental customers in the

importing countries.

• Financial difficulties and corruption

in some markets.

• Logistics.

• Production instability

15

Page 16: Sabic Case

EXTERNALOpportunities Threats

Because of the high oil prices gained in the last four

years, the revenues can be used to make other industries

that support and improve the petrochemical industry in

Saudi Arabia.

There are many markets which Sabic has accessed can be

improved by differentiation strategies

There are many markets which Sabic has not accessed

It is true that Saudi Arabia can not exceeds the

production of oil as OPEC states, but the extra quantities

of oil can be used to produce better and cheaper

petrochemical industry

The petrochemical industry can be used as the basic for

other industries that suit the needs of the local, regional

and international markets.

The petrochemical industry attracts local, regional and

foreign investment and that will improve the overall

economy of Saudi Arabia and enhances the position of

the petrochemical industry.

There are many competitors of Sabic

in the area of petrochemical

industry. These competitors share

with Sabic much strength. An

example of these competitors is

Qatar.

There are many regional and

international competitors.

The human factor must be improved

in Sabic by applying the knowledge

management concept to improve the

HR.

The performance of Sabic is weak in

some countries and it can be

improved.

3.6.2. Market Segmentation & Market Share

Market segmentation starts from the observation that different subgroups or

segments of a market exhibit different consumption preferences and then

seeks to develop products or services which will match the needs of these

segments.

16

Page 17: Sabic Case

Identifying the correct market segment for the product range in general and

for the individual product in particular is the biggest success. This can be

made possible when an authentic data of the offers and orders is available.

Also, this data can help us to think on the following basis:

- To look in to the possibilities and the growth of the business in

the areas need to be explored.

- To maintain the market share in the segments we are successful

in doing good business.

- To make overall strategy based on the market segments.

Sabic for its Urea products has segmented the market into six areas

according to the geographical locations. These locations are Australia, Far

East Asia, the Middle East, Africa, Europe and the USA.

17

Page 18: Sabic Case

Australia

As

18

SABIC'S UREA SHIPMENTS TOAUSTRALIA

11631093

1208 1234

1145 1150

280

120126

373

191273247

1311

10%31%17%23%

19%

10%24%

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

QTY

: KM

T

SABIC QTYTOTAL IMPORTSSABIC SHARE

SABIC QTY 247 273 191 373 126 120 280

TOTAL IMPORTS 1311 1163 1093 1208 1234 1145 1150

SABIC SHARE 19% 23% 17% 31% 10% 10% 24%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Page 19: Sabic Case

19

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

220

240

SUMMIT PIVOT INCITEC LTD ICITEC & PIVOT LTD HIFERT

SUMMIT 150 153 146 211 126 120 81

PIVOT 97 120 76

INCITEC LTD 45 42

ICITEC & PIVOT LTD 44

HIFERT 199

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

SABI C'S UREA SHI PMENTS TO AUTRALI A

247 KMT 273 KMT191 KMT

373 KMT

126 KMT 120 KMT

280 KMT

Page 20: Sabic Case

New Zealand

Market consumption

Production SABIC market share

MAIN Competitors

600 KMT 260 KMT 81.5% MITCO &QAFCO

20

SABIC'S UREA SHIPMENTS TO NEW ZEALAND

184

238

194

339 346356

441

394

320

148

261

167169

95

129

194

82%

37%54%

66%50% 48%

52%49%

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

QTY

: KM

T

SABIC QTYTOTAL IMPORTSOUR SHARE

SABIC QTY 129 95 169 167 184 238 148 261

TOTAL IMPORTS 194 194 339 346 356 441 394 320

OUR SHARE 66% 49% 50% 48% 52% 54% 37% 82%

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Page 21: Sabic Case

Thailand

Market consumption

Production SABIC market share

MAIN Competitors

1,500 KMT NONE 40.4% YARA MITCO PIC Helm (Egypt)

21

20406080

100120140160180200220240260280300320340360380400420440460480500

Chia Tai TFMC Thai Mc Sumitai

Chia Tai 267 311 435 414 446 419 511

TFMC 187 179 48 16

Thai Mc 18 26 32 47 6 14

Sumitai 23 111 94 81

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

SABI C'S UREA SHI PMENTS TO THAI LAND

454 KMT

508 KMT

509 KMT 485 KMT 604 KMT 519 KMT

607 KMT

Page 22: Sabic Case

Philippines

Market consumption

Production SABIC market share

MAIN Competitors

550 KMT NONNE 37.1 % YARA

22

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

220

240

SWIRE FARMIX TRAMO

SWIRE 133 174 143 69 50 164

FARMIX 10 40

TRAMO 93

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

SABIC'S UREA SHIPMENTS TO PHL.

133 KMT

174 KMT

143 KMT

69 KMT

0 KMT

153 KMT

204 KMT

Page 23: Sabic Case

23

SABIC'S UREA SHIPMENTS TO PHL.

70

0

703

780

667693

550

159205

143174

13383

500

37%

23%0%

17%19% 18%

8%19%

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

QTY:

KM

T

SABIC QTYTOTAL IMPORTSOUR SHARE

SABIC QTY 83 133 174 143 70 0 159 205

TOTAL IMPORTS 500 703 931 780 916 667 693 550

OUR SHARE 17% 19% 19% 18% 8% 0% 23% 37%

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Page 24: Sabic Case

South Korea

Market consumption

Production SABIC market share

MAIN Competitors

990 KMT 320 KMT 9.5% QAFCO CHINA

24

SABIC'S UREA SHIPMENTS TO S.KOREA

853 38 17 26

49 66

522

467

675

771

656

834

700

62

500

9%

7%7%

2%8% 2%

3%10%

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

QTY

: KM

T

SABIC QTYTOTAL IMPORTSOUR SHARE

SABIC QTY 8 53 38 17 26 49 62 66

TOTAL IMPORTS 500 522 467 675 771 656 834 700

OUR SHARE 2% 10% 8% 2% 3% 7% 7% 9%

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Page 25: Sabic Case

The Middles East

25

Page 26: Sabic Case

The USA

Market consumption

Production SABIC market share

MAIN Competitors

10 KMT 5400 KMT 6% PIC QAFCO Central America

South Africa

Market consumption

Production SABIC market share

MAIN Competitors

475 KMT Nil 60 % Yara

  2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Sabic 140 146 195 250 337 221 287

Imports 510 467 715 485 587 474 475

Sabic Share

27% 31% 27% 52% 57% 47% 60%

26

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Sabic

Imports

Page 27: Sabic Case

East Africa

Market consumption

Production SABIC market share

MAIN Competitors

192 KMT Nil 20 % Qafco; FertilFSU

  2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 (Est)

Sabic 10 34 45 55 12 39 32

Imports 107 60 92 60 79 192 147

Sabic Share

9% 57% 49% 92% 15% 20% 22%

27

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006(Est)

Sabic

Imports

Page 28: Sabic Case

Europe

Market consumption

Production SABIC market share

MAIN Competitors

6.5 MMT 3.8 MMT 0 % Egypt , QafcoFSU, EU15

  2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Sabic 0 0 0 46 28 0 0

Imports 4.4 m 4.1 m 4 m 4.5 m 4 m 4 m 4.1 m

Sabic Share 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0%

3.6.3. Channels of Distribution

Sabic has an international distribution network that enables it to reach all of

its major markets. All of the production of Sabic is transported by sea. The

logistics costs have been found to represent 30% of the cost of the material.

Therefore, the channel of distribution is a key factor in the Urea production.

28

0

200000

400000

600000

800000

1000000

1200000

1400000

1600000

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Sabic

Imports

Page 29: Sabic Case

3.6.4 Major Competition

For the Urea market, there are four types of major competitors. Of course

there are many other competitors, but these four are the major competitors of

Sabic. These competitors are as the following:

1- Black Sea

Country Quantity (KMT)

Sales Methods

Product Types

Russia 4450 SPOT P-UREA Ukraine 3600 SPOT P-UREA

29

Page 30: Sabic Case

2- Egypt

Company Name Quantity (KMT)

Sales Methods

Product Types

EFC 1200 Traders G-UREAALEXFERT 600 Traders G-UREAHELWAN 600 Traders G-UREA

3- Arabian Gulf

Company Name Quantity (KMT)

Sales Methods

Product Types

PIC 1035 LTC/SPOT G-UREAGPIC 615 LTC/SPOT G-UREAQAFCO 2850 LTC/SPOT G&P UREAFERTIL 575 SPOT P-UREA

4- Malaysia

Company Name Quantity (KMT)

Sales Methods

Product Types

MITCO 1300 LTC/SPOT G-UREA

3.6.5. Customers

The customers of Sabic can be divided into six groups accruing to their

geographical locations. These six groups are as the following:

1- Australia Region:

Australia: it is divided into two regions: east/ south east & west

Australia

New Zealand

2- South East Asia

Thailand

Philippines

30

Page 31: Sabic Case

South Korea

3- The Middle East

India

Pakistan

Sri Lanka

Bangladesh

Iran

Yemen

Jordan

4- USA

5- Africa

South Africa: Sudan

East Africa: Ethiopia

6- Europe

However, the need for Urea for global customer should be explained to see

the potentials of Sabic in the global markets and to know how it can invest

and improve its positions.

From the table below which show the Urea Supply/Demand Balance form

1994 to 2015, it is obvious that the potential of improvement is promising.

The need of Urea is not covered by suppliers and that gives Sabic an

opportunity to improve and increase its position in these markets.

31

Page 32: Sabic Case

From another point of view, the figure below shows that the need for Urea

will increase in the coming years. It should be mentioned that after 2006, the

figures are expected by Sabic.

32

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

f

2007

f

2008

f

2009

f

2010

f

2011

f

2012

f

2013

f

2014

f

2015

f

75%

77%

79%

81%

83%

85%

87%

89%

91%

93%

95%

Capacity Production Operating Rate

Page 33: Sabic Case

3.7 Analyzing Performance

3.7.1. Discussion

Porter explains that there are five forces that determine industry

attractiveness and long-run industry profitability and competitions. In this

part, these five factors are applied to Sabic in the Urea market.

Threat of New Entrants

Since the petrochemical industry depends on two factors which are the

availability of the raw materials such as natural gas and oil and the funds for

investing, it is difficult for new entrants to enter this market. From another

point of view, the availability of oil and gas in Saudi Arabia in large

quantities, and the availabili8ty of funds from high oil prices,, enables Saudi

Arabia to invest heavily in this area more than other competitors. Therefore,

the barriers of the threats of new entrants are high.

Threat of Substitutes

It is true that there are many researches that are being made for replacing oil

by other alternatives, but the process is at its begging and all of the other

alternatives being developed are not viable. And even if this point is

reached, products such as Urea can not be replaced by other products

because of the characteristics of this material and because of the buyers’

willingness to have such a replacement.

33

Page 34: Sabic Case

Bargaining Power of Suppliers

Sabic has a strength point in this because f the following. First, the raw

materials are taken directly from Saudi Arabia and the oil industry is owned

by the government. In addition, because of the nature of oil in Saudi Arabia,

it needs less cost to be processed.

Bargaining Power of Buyers

It is expected that the demand for Urea will increase in the coming years. In

addition, the customers can not have backward integration because of the

properties of the material. However, there are many competitions in the

market and they compete to have contracts from these customers. The

customers have been segmented by their geographical locations. The sub-

grouped are segmented according to their quantity of urea consumption. For

example, Far East Asia has the following customers: Australia, New

Zealand, Thailand, the Philippines, and South Korea. However, the sub

grouped is divided into three locations according to their consumption of

urea. These areas are South East Asian countries such as Thailand, the

Philippines and South Korea, Australia and New Zealand. Further, fort he

case of Australia, it is Sub-Sub divided to two regions: east/ south east &

34

Page 35: Sabic Case

west Australia. Other customers are the Middle East, Africa, Europe and the

USA.

Intensity of Rivalry

There are many major and strong competitors of Sabic in the Urea product.

Some of these competitors have the same characteristics that Sabic has. In

addition, these competitors cover a wide geographical area. Each of them

can supply their near by customers with better logistics better than Sabic or

even similar to Sabic. In addition, there are many mergers between these

competitors and these mergers will affect the market share. For the Urea

market, there are four major competitors. These competitors are Black Sea

(Russia and Ukraine), Egypt (three locations) the Arabian Gulf (Qatar,

Kuwait, Iran) and Malaysia. For the case of the Black Sea, they produce P-

Urea. For the case of Egypt, it produces G-Urea. For the Arabian Gulf

Competitors, they produce both G and P Urea. Finally, Malaysia produces

G-Urea.

3.7.2. Results

Sabic is a strong company with strong bases. From the analysis above, it has

strong industry attractiveness and long-run industry profitability and

35

Page 36: Sabic Case

competitions. However, the presence of competitors which are regional and

international reduces the effectiveness of Sabic in the international markets.

In order to improve the competitiveness of Sabic, there are some points that

should be made.

First of all, the company must ensure that it has the enough skilled and

talented workers who can improve the position of Sabic. Also, the strategy,

vision and mission and goals of the companies must be tied with the

performance of workers, employees, managers, department and firms of

Sabic. Applying the concept of Balance Scored Card will serve this purpose.

Moreover, taking the lead in the area of corporate social responsibility

(CSR) will build the brand name of the company and it will enable it to

reach better competition skills in front of the other competitors.

Furthermore, Sabic should look into increasing long term contract (one year

or more) sales over spot sales. The prices are based on one or a combination

of the fertilizer products and this will enable Sabic to benefit from its

existing customers. In order to satisfy the need of the customers in terms of

time, contract quantities should be distributed evenly thorough the year to

insure regular monthly lifting.

Because of the presence of competition, the logistics play a major role in the

Urea market. For example, because of the location of Egypt, Europe was

closed in front of Sabic because of this point. Therefore, logistics is the

backbone of success in the market. It is true that Sabic depend in traders

because there is no direct business, but this should changed in order to enter

36

Page 37: Sabic Case

new markets or improve the position in existing market by improving the

logistics of Sabic.

PART – IV: CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

There are three points that considered as real weaknesses for Sabic. The first

one is the logistics. This important issue should be solved because it is

considered as the weakest point affecting Sabic’s operations in international

market. The second one is the instable production and this can be solved by

long term contractors. Finally, the third one is the internal environment in

which Sabic should improve the human resources by applying strong and

effective courses that will elevate the skills of these employees and manager

to fulfill their positions. It can be notices that the strongest competitors of

Sabic in the area of Urea are the competitors located in the Arabian Gulf.

They have the same strengths, opportunities, geographical characteristics

and economical and political properties. This makes them the strongest

competitors facing Sabic. One of the solutions is cooperation and integration

between these companies under the umbrella of the GCC. When the GCC is

functional, many of these problems will be solved automatically.

37

Page 38: Sabic Case

REFERENCES

1. Alfonso, Felipe B. “Is responsibility on the menu? Managers must understand what corporate social responsibility programs mean for all aspects of the business, and any CSR initiative must be led from the top.” Communication World May-June 2005: 1-3. <http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m4422/is_3_22/ai_n13667321/print>

2. Atkinson, Maurice. “Measuring the Performance of the IT Function in the UK Health Service Using a Balanced Scorecard Approach.” Academic Conferences Limited Oct 2002. <http://www.ejise.com/volume-7/v7-iss-1/v7-i1-art1-atkinson.pdf#search='Balanced%20Scorecard%20%20article%20%20abstract'>

3. “Core Competency” <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Core_competency>4. “Innovation Key To Creating Value.” Deseret News (Salt Lake City) 9

Jan 2005: 1-2. <http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4188/is_20050109/ai_n11501513/print>

5. Pearce, Brian. “Sustainability And Business Competitiveness Measuring The Benefit For Business Competitive Advantage From Social Responsibility And Sustainability.” Centre for Sustainable Investment December 2003

6. Pineno, Charles J. “Balanced Scorecard Applications And Model Building: A Survey And Comparison Of The Manufactured Homes And Motor Homes Industries: An Analysis Of The Performance Measurement Practices In The Manufactured And Motor Homes Industries Focuses On The Development Of A Balanced Scorecard Methodology That Would Enhance Measurement Accuracy And Increase Productivity And Efficiency.” Management Accounting Quarterly Fall, 2004. <http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0OOL/is_1_6/ai_n11832747/print>

6. Teach, Edward. “Two views of virtue: the corporate social responsibility movement is picking up steam. Should you worry about it?.” CFO: Magazine for Senior Financial Executives Dec 2005: 1-3. <http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m3870/is_17_21/ai_n15999730/print>

8. <http://www.the-saudi.net/business-enter/economy.htm#Petrochemicals>

38

Page 39: Sabic Case

9. Sabic Web Site

10. Sabic Internal Documents

39