run ii status and prospects - spalding1 run ii status and prospects jeff spalding fermilab june 14,...
Post on 15-Jan-2016
221 views
TRANSCRIPT
Run II Status and Prospects - Spalding 1
Run II Status and ProspectsRun II Status and Prospects
Jeff SpaldingFermilab
June 14, 2004
Run II Status and Prospects - Spalding 2
ContentsContents
Introduction Major elements of the Run II “campaign” Present performance Status of the upgrade projects Luminosity projection Summary
Run II Status and Prospects - Spalding 3
Run II goal: maximize integrated luminosity delivered to CDF & Run II goal: maximize integrated luminosity delivered to CDF & D0 …D0 …
Run II Status and Prospects - Spalding 4
… … with a program of upgrades throughout the complexwith a program of upgrades throughout the complex
Recycler Ring
Run II Status and Prospects - Spalding 5
Basis for the Plan: What drives the luminosityBasis for the Plan: What drives the luminosity
Peak Luminosity
Luminosity lifetime (tunes, beam-beam interactions)
Reliable Operation
p, pbar, form factor F, * provide some gains
But major improvements from bunch intensities
especially total number of pbars BNpbar, (B=36 bunches for Run II) proton brightness (Np/p) is constrained by beam-beam tune shift
Run II Status and Prospects - Spalding 6
Major Elements of the Run II CampaignMajor Elements of the Run II Campaign
Run II Status and Prospects - Spalding 7
Operational improvements and upgrade projectsOperational improvements and upgrade projects
Near Term (and ongoing) Improved reliability and operating efficiency
Failure modes, abort system improvements… Tevatron alignment Improved instrumentation throughout the complex
Optimization of transfers, improved optics and helices in Tevatron
Upgrade Projects Increase pbar production
Slip stacking Pbar acceptance upgrade Stacking rate and stack size (stacktail, Recycler, e-cooling)
Upgrade Tevatron for higher bunch intensities Helix TEL: active beam-beam compensation
Run II Status and Prospects - Spalding 8
ReliabilityReliability
The number of store hours per week is up 27% from FY03 - the TEV is a more reliable machine.
Typical store length 15 hrs last year >24 hrs now
Due to: Alignment of the TEV
• Dipole un-rolls, Low Beta alignment, Smart bolt retrofit Reliability strategy
• Aggressively pursue equipment failures– Individual components and Systems (e.g. TEV abort
system) Operations strategy
• With improved reliability run long stores– More time to ensure large stack size– Minimize the effects of store turnaround time– Minimize impact of parasitic studies
• Short focused dedicated studies– Configuration control
Run II Status and Prospects - Spalding 9
Dynamic plan – adjust the strategy when new information from operations and project R&D
Major Elements
Increase number of protons on the pbar production target Slip stacking (5E12 >8E12 protons on pbar target) Upgrade the target itself to handle higher intensity
Increase antiproton collection Increase the gradient of the antiproton collection lens Increase the aperture of the antiproton collection transfer
line (AP2) and the Debuncher ring. Increase the antiproton stacking and storing capabilities
Increase the flux capability of the Accumulator stacktail stochastic cooling system.
Use the Recycler as a second antiproton storage ring, with both stochastic and electron cooling
Upgrade Tevatron to handle higher intensity bunches. Improvements to helix separation and smoothness Active compensation for beam-beam tune shift using the
TEL
Upgrade ProjectsUpgrade Projects
Run II Status and Prospects - Spalding 10
Status of OperationsStatus of Operations
Run I
Run II Status and Prospects - Spalding 11
Status: Integrated LuminosityStatus: Integrated Luminosity
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390
Days Since June 1
Inte
grat
ed L
umin
osity
(pb
-1)
6/03 - 6/04
6/02 - 6/03
FY04 Design
FY04 Base
Up 55% with 14% fewer scheduled running weeks
Average integrated luminosity per week is up 80%
Compare the last 12 months to the year before
Run II Status and Prospects - Spalding 12
Status: Peak LuminosityStatus: Peak Luminosity
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390
Days Since June 1
Pe
ak
Lu
min
osi
ty ( b
-1/s
ec)
6/03 - 6/04
6/02 - 6/03
FY04 Design
FY04 Base
Current best = 7.6E31 cm-2s-1
*
Run II Status and Prospects - Spalding 13
Summary of Current OperationsSummary of Current Operations
Booster running at record intensities Major improvements in transfer efficiencies and emittances,
TEV tunes, optics and helix Improved reliability and operations allows longer stores
larger stacks higher luminosity
However, stacking rate is ~75% of current goal – present focus of investigation and improvement for the stacktail and core cooling systems
Near term: introduce mixed-source operation (pbars loaded from both Accumulator and Recycler) – first [pilot] store 6/9/04 successful (6.7E31)
And slip-stacking by end of 04 ( already tested at 75% of design intensity) – awaits completion of RF upgrade
Run II Status and Prospects - Spalding 14
Status of the Upgrade ProjectsStatus of the Upgrade Projects
Run II Status and Prospects - Spalding 15
Main InjectorMain Injector
Slip Stacking (goal x1.8ppp on pbar tgt)
Excellent progress Tested @ 6 x 1012 and 1.5 nsec bunch
length on pbar target Reliable operation >8 x 1012 requires
RF upgrade (beam-loading compensation)
On track for end of this year.
Run II Status and Prospects - Spalding 16
Pbar SourcePbar Source
Pbar Acceptance (goal: x2) Lithium Lens (goal x 1.1)
Prototype of new design (higher field gradient) bench test successful AP2 and Debuncher aperture increase (goal x1.8)
Developed procedures for beam-based identification of limiting apertures, identified components to modify
Stacktail cooling upgrade
Cooling system upgrade (extends the bandwith 2-4 2-6 GHz) Requires the large stack to be in Recycler (with e-cool), and “rapid
transfers” Not [easily] reversible
emphasize a phased approach Interim upgrade (05) [NEW]
• Reconfigure existing cooling tanks -quick and reversible• Simulated performance ~30E10 per hr
Full upgrade, with new cooling tanks (06)• Simulated performance ~40E10 per hr
Run II Status and Prospects - Spalding 17
RecyclerRecycler
The Recycler has made excellent progress over the past year Transverse emittance growth is no longer an issue (vacuum problems
solved) Met the performance specs needed for commissioning electron cooling Ready to be integrated into operations (with stochastic cooling)
Provides possibility for interim operating phase [NEW]
Extract pbars from both Accumulator and Recycler: “mixed-source” e.g. 24 bunches from the Accumulator + 12 bunches from the Recycler A few (2-4) interim transfers from Accumulator to Recycler Improves average stacking rate in the Accumulator
Reasons Push Recycler commissioning progress by plunging it into operations Potential luminosity enhancement – more pbars for smaller emittances
• Break-even right now, potential for up to 20% gain in the next year Flexibility in the Run II Upgrade schedule
• Merge more naturally into commissioning electron cooling
Run II Status and Prospects - Spalding 18
Electron CoolingElectron Cooling
R&D program on e-beam is complete, now moving the setup to the Recycler R&D scheduled stretched by ~2 months
NOT BAD!
Operational test of the full system successful All major components, diagnostics and
controls developed and tested Beam properties achieved close to spec
(analysis ongoing)
Will add additional Pelletron section at Recycler reliable operation at 4.3 MeV
Commission e-beam and then pbar cooling in Recycler, parasitic to HEP, then intro e-cooled stacks to HEP (05)
Still R&D (until pbar cooling demonstrated next year), but excellent progress
Run II Status and Prospects - Spalding 19
TevatronTevatron
Major improvements so far Lifetime at 150 GeV
Larger aperture, alignment and dipole un-rolls Emittance dilution reduced
De-coupling at TEV injection, optimization of injection optics
Helix improvements CDF IP
Centered beam in low beta quads (4mm move at CDF), and re-aligned the quadrupoles
New Low Beta Optics 20% increase in luminosity
Upgrades Further alignment improvements in shutdown 04 (and
05) Add separators and polarity switches in shutdown 04
and 05 improved helices
Run II Status and Prospects - Spalding 20
Luminosity ProjectionsLuminosity Projections
Run II Status and Prospects - Spalding 21
Luminosity ProjectionLuminosity Projection
Luminosity model incorporates Performance parameters from simulation, parametric model and
data Long term operating experience
• Sustained average store length was 15 hrs (now >24)• Sustained average 85 store hrs/week (operating weeks often >>100)
Scheduled shutdowns + turn on & recovery + learning slopes
Expect to do better on some parameters, worse on others
What’s new The following plots are from Feb04 DOE review
• Illustrate strategy• Updated projection will be similar in scale
We are in the process of updating the projections for: • e-cooling and stacktail schedules and strategy• Improved reliability (longer stores and stacking)• Mixed-source op - assume break even (conservative)
Run II Status and Prospects - Spalding 22
Design and Base Projections Design and Base Projections (Feb04 DOE Review)(Feb04 DOE Review)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
9/29/03 9/29/04 9/30/05 10/1/06 10/2/07 10/2/08 10/3/09
Start of Fiscal Year
Inte
grat
ed L
umin
osit
y (
fb-1
)
Design Projection
Base Projection
Integrated Luminosity
Design Projection - No schedule contingency, maintains eng. design margin per subproject
Base Projection - Assumes schedule slip for all subprojects and that all subprojects under perform
Run II Status and Prospects - Spalding 23
Design and Base Projections Design and Base Projections (Feb04 DOE Review)(Feb04 DOE Review)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
9/29/03 9/29/04 9/30/05 10/1/06 10/2/07 10/2/08 10/3/09
Start of Fiscal Year
Inte
grat
ed L
umin
osit
y pe
r W
eek
(pb-1)
Phase 1(FY04)
Phase 2(Slip Stacking)
Phase 3(Recycler &
Electron Cooling)
Phase 4(Stacktail upgrade)
Phase 5(Tevatron upgrades
complete)
Phase 6(No upgrade-related studies)
Design Projection
Base Projection
We arehere
Integrated Luminosity per Week
Run II Status and Prospects - Spalding 24
Risk Analysis / Strategy Risk Analysis / Strategy (Feb04 DOE Review)(Feb04 DOE Review)
Our plan is to deliver the Design Projectionbut develop strategy for fallback scenarios:
Base Projection models schedule slip and under-performance for all upgrades
Can also ask: where would we be without Recycler & e-cooling? with e-cooling, but without stacktail upgrade?
Run II Status and Prospects - Spalding 25
Risk Analysis / Strategy Risk Analysis / Strategy (Feb04 DOE Review)(Feb04 DOE Review)
Design Projection Electron Cooling Stacktail Upgrade
Parameters in FY09• Debuncher & AP2 at 32-mm-mrad• Slip Stacking at 8x1012 ppp• Av. Stk Rate = 39x1010/hr• Stk in Accum = 20x1010
• Stk in Rec’r = 570x1010
Base Projection As above with sched & param slip
Parameters in FY09• Debuncher & AP2 at 25• Slip Stacking at 7x1012 ppp• Av. Stk Rate = 24x1010/hr• Stk in Accum = 24x1010
• Stk in Rec’r = 360x1010
Black Projection NO Electron Cooling NO Stacktail Upgrade
Parameters in FY09• Debuncher & AP2 at 21• Slip Stacking at 7x1012
• Av. Stk Rate = 14x1010/hr• Stk in Accum = 205x1010
• Stk in Rec’r = 0x1010
Purple Projection Electron Cooling NO Stacktail Upgrade
Parameters in FY09• Debuncher & AP2 at 20• Slip Stacking at 8x1012
• Av. Stk Rate = 23x1010/hr• Stk in Acum = 58x1010
• Stk in Rec’r = 337x1010
Run II Status and Prospects - Spalding 26
0
10
20
30
40
50
9/29/03 9/29/04 9/30/05 10/1/06 10/2/07 10/2/08 10/3/09
Start of Fiscal Year
Inte
gra
ted
Lu
min
osi
ty p
er
We
ek
(pb
-1)
e-cooling antiprotons
f or HEP
6/ 1/ 05
Stacktail Upgd ready to install
Rapid transf ers
Acc Upgd on track
8/ 8/ 05
Risk Analysis / Strategy Risk Analysis / Strategy (Feb04 DOE Review)(Feb04 DOE Review)
with e-cooling, but w/o stacktail upgd
without e-cooling& stacktail upgd
Branch points from Design ProjectionDesign
Black
Purple
Assumes average store length 15 hrs
Run II Status and Prospects - Spalding 27
0
10
20
30
40
50
9/29/03 9/29/04 9/30/05 10/1/06 10/2/07 10/2/08 10/3/09
Start of Fiscal Year
Inte
grat
ed L
umin
osity
per
Wee
k (p
b-1)
Strategy ChangesStrategy Changes
Design
Black
Purple
mixed-source
operation longer stores
e-cooling and interim stacktail upgrade will be delayed to fall 2005, full upgrade in 06
interim Stacktail upgrade
WARNING: curves not yet updated changes in green to be implemented
Run II Status and Prospects - Spalding 28
Risk Analysis / Strategy Risk Analysis / Strategy (Feb04 DOE Review)(Feb04 DOE Review)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
9/29/03 9/29/04 9/30/05 10/1/06 10/2/07 10/2/08 10/3/09
Start of Fiscal Year
Inte
gra
ted
Lu
min
osi
ty (
fb-1
)
8.5 fb-1
6.5
4.4
Design
Base
Black
Purple
Run II Status and Prospects - Spalding 29
Summary Summary
Current performance is above the design projection
80% higher weekly luminosity than a year ago
Major achievements in the last year (Tevatron perf, Recycler…)
There is a complex-wide plan for the Run II campaign
Plan is dynamic: schedule/scope adjustments, mixed-source, capitalize on improved reliability
The upgrade projects are making good technical progress
The plan and progress are formally reviewed by DOE
With the updated plan, expect the design projection to be close to the previous 8.5 fb-1 2009, with fall-back scenarios >4.5 fb-1