report for electric vehicle charging infrastructure in new

Report ForElectric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure inNew Multifamily Developments -Requirement Options and Costing AnalysisElectrical Engineering Services

PREPARED FOR:City of Richmond6911 No 3 RoadRichmond, B.C. V6Y 2C1

AUTHORED BY:AES Engineering Ltd.

PEER REVIEWED BY:Kevin Cheong P.Eng., RCDD, LEED AP BD+C

SUBMITTED BY:AES Engineering Ltd.1330 Granville StreetVancouver, BC Canada V6Z 1M7P 604.569.6500 F 604.569.6501www.AESEngr.com

PROJECT NO. 2-16-334April 4, 2017

Electric Vehicle Charging Requirements – AnalysisCity of Richmond

AES Engineering Ltd. 1330 Granville Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6Z 1M7 P 604.569.6500 F 604.569.6501

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 SCOPE ...................................................................................................................................................................... 1

1.1 General ..................................................................................................................................................... 1

2.0 DEFINING EV INFRASTRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS AND TECHNOLOGIES ...................................................... 2

2.1 General ..................................................................................................................................................... 2

2.2 Infrastructure Definitions ....................................................................................................................... 2

2.3 “Load Management” and “Load Sharing” ............................................................................................ 2

3.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ON POLICY FOR EV INFRASTRUCTURE ........................................................................ 3

3.1 General ..................................................................................................................................................... 3

3.2 Minimum Performance Levels .............................................................................................................. 4

3.3 Accommodating “Load Management” and “Load Sharing” ............................................................... 5

3.4 Billing Systems ........................................................................................................................................ 6

3.5 Mechanisms To Ensure Availability Of Charging ................................................................................. 6

4.0 ASSESSMENT OF DIFFERENT EV INFRASTRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS .......................................................... 7

4.1 Life Cycle Costing .................................................................................................................................... 7

4.2 Qualitative Commentary ........................................................................................................................ 7

5.0 CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................................................................................ 8

5.1 Recommendations .................................................................................................................................. 8

Appendix A – Costing Analysis

Appendix B – Costing Analysis – Partial Infrastructure

Appendix C – Parkade Layouts

Appendix D – Single Line Diagrams

Appendix E – Metering Data

Appendix F – Proposed CEC Changes

Appendix G – EVSE Performance Analysis

Appendix H – Right-to-Charge Legislation

Appendix I – Load Calculations

Appendix J – Definitions

Appendix K – Example Bylaw

Appendix L – Acknowledgements


Page 1


1.0 SCOPE

1.1 GENERAL

The City of Richmond’s Official Community Plan (OCP) includes a target to reduce Richmond’s community

greenhouse gas emissions 80% below 2007 levels by 2050. Richmond’s Community Energy and

Emissions Plan (CEEP) identifies that to reach this target will require near universal adoption of zero

carbon vehicles by the 2040s. The CEEP includes Strategy 7 to “Promote Low Carbon Vehicles”, and

actions pursuant to this strategy.

The following report addresses Action 18 of the CEEP, which states that the City of Richmond (The City)

will “set minimum requirements for EV charging infrastructure in new developments”, as part of an

objective to reduce energy use and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Accordingly, the City is currently re-

evaluating policies to improve the provision of electric vehicle (EV) infrastructure in new developments, to

better enable wide-spread adoption.

Multi Unit Residential Building (MURB) construction represents 58% (24,360 units) of the projected

increase in residential dwellings from 2011 to 2041, and is the focus of this report. MURB’s inherently

include the greatest barriers to EV adoption due to the challenges associated with common property.

Community charging infrastructure deployment, which is also a fundamental element in the holistic

approach to the provision of EV infrastructure is not addressed in the analysis.

The report presents the results of an analysis of EV charging infrastructure requirements for Council’s

Consideration. The assessment included:

· Development of definitions for charging infrastructure requirements;

· Recommendation of mechanisms to better ensure effective implementation of EVSE in new strata

developments;

· Assessment of costs and benefits of different EV infrastructure requirements.

The intent of the assessment was to identify reasonable, cost effective measures, to achieve the greatest

value for money, with consideration afforded to both developers and EV owners, whilst remaining

cognizant of the fundamental objective to better enable wide-spread adoption.

The following sections provide the results of the assessment for each of the major items indicated above.


Page 2


2.0 DEFINING EV INFRASTRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS AND TECHNOLOGIES

2.1 GENERAL

Definitions for key EV infrastructure configurations are provided in the following sub-sections. Appendix J

includes definitions for other terminology used in this report.

2.2 INFRASTRUCTURE DEFINITIONS

The following definitions for EV infrastructure requirements are recommended.

· “EVSE (Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment) installed”: All infrastructure required for charging of an

electrical vehicle (EV), including all electrical equipment (including metering), cabling and associated

raceways, and connections, and Level 2 EVSE equipment permanently installed.

· “Energized”: All infrastructure required for charging of an electric vehicle (EV), including all electrical

equipment (including metering), cabling and associated raceways, and connections, with exception of

the Level 2 EVSE equipment.

· “Partial EV infrastructure” (note: not recommended for inclusion in policy): All infrastructure required

for charging of an electric vehicle (EV), including all electrical equipment (including metering), cabling

and associated raceways, and connections, up to the provisional branch panelboard locations, minus

the feeder cabling to the panelboards. Raceways for the feeder cabling to the provisional panelboard

locations would be included as part of the “Partial EV infrastructure”. The branch panelboards and

associated feeder cabling, branch cabling and associated raceways, and connections to EVSE’s would

be installed at a later-date.

Although “Partial EV infrastructure” configurations were assessed, it is not recommended for inclusion in

City regulation, as detailed in Section 3.1. Refer to single line diagrams (Appendix D) for further details of

the components of the EV infrastructure.

2.3 “LOAD MANAGEMENT” AND “LOAD SHARING”

Load management and load sharing are EVSE control technologies that reduce peak power demand and

improve utilization of EV charging systems, thereby reducing electrical infrastructure costs. The

technologies also provide the capability to control the time of use, which may be utilized in reducing the

impact on the Utility’s system.

Terminology utilized in this report includes:

· “Load management”: Control of the current drawn by the EVSE, at the main switchboard of the

building.


Page 3


· “Load sharing”: Control of the current drawn by multiple EVSE on a single circuit, to ensure the

capacity of the circuit is not exceeded, and that maximum charging is achieved at each EVSE based

on the available capacity.

A number of EV charging service providers offer EVSE with load management and/or load sharing

functionality. One business model that has been established is to provide EVSE equipment capable of load

management and load sharing, as well as metering EV electricity consumption to allow for reconciliation

of building electrical costs. Providers offering these “smart charging” services in the market today typically

charge a service fee that is paid by the EV owner. This arrangement is assumed in the life cycle costing in

Appendix A. However, some EVSE providers are emerging that offer EVSE capable of load management

and/or sharing that are not based on such a subscription model, and could result in reduced costs for end

users.

3.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ON POLICY FOR EV INFRASTRUCTURE

3.1 GENERAL

If the City intends for all residents of new multifamily developments to have access to “at home” EV

charging, it is recommended that City policy specify that all residential parking stalls be Energized. As part

of the Terms of Reference for this study, the City requested commentary on the following question:

For parking stalls that are not “Energized”, should the City specify that remaining stalls feature a “Partial

EV Infrastructure” configuration? The proponent should propose a “Partial EV Infrastructure” definition that

can be included in City regulation. The proponent should then describe the benefits and drawbacks of

including this definition in City regulation, and recommend whether it be included.

Although “Partial EV infrastructure” configuration specifications were developed, it is not recommended

that the City make reference to this configuration in the requirements due to:

· Higher costs associated with completion of the installation at a later-date. Appendix B includes Partial

Infrastructure costing analysis;

· Additional time associated with completion of the installation at a later-date;

· Delays in gaining strata approval;

· Extending the sales cycle (awaiting installation of charging infrastructure);

· Common property complications associated with apportioning of costs;

· Reasonable costs associated with “Energized” infrastructure;

· Complications with parking stall re-assignment;


Page 4


· Disincentive of additional costs for the EV owner, which is contrary to the initiative to encourage EV

adoption (i.e. Demand elasticity is high (between 3.0 and 4.0), which means sales are significantly

impacted by price);

· Inclusion of Partial EV infrastructure assumes EV adoption will follow a linear progression as opposed

to exponential, which is contrary to the historical record for disruptive technologies.

Analysis identifies that Partial EV infrastructure provision represents significantly higher final costs

compared to complete (Energized) installations. Depending on building archetype and design, selected

infrastructure configuration, and extent of partial provisions, the increase in final costs (with the exception

of the townhouse archetype) ranges from 20% to well over 700%. Refer to Appendix B for a summary of

results of the Partial EV infrastructure costing analysis.

Given acceptance that EV adoption is required to meet GHG emission reduction targets, and widespread

projections for exponential growth in uptake of EV’s, the logical conclusion is that provision of Partial EV

infrastructure incurs additional time and cost on future buildings owners and residents, and is contrary to

the objective to better enable wide-spread adoption. On this basis, complete EV infrastructure installation

(Energized) should not be viewed from the perspective of an “additional cost” compared to Partial EV

infrastructure, but more appropriately, a “cost savings” compared to Partial EV infrastructure.

3.2 M INIMUM PERFORMANCE LEVELS

As part of the Terms of Reference for this study, the City requested commentary on the following question:

Should the City specify a minimum performance level for EV Infrastructure (e.g. a kW minimum; or

average and maximum kWh overnight delivered to stalls)? This could preclude load managed designs that

provide insufficient power to effectively charge vehicles. The proponent should recommend whether a

minimum performance level is necessary, and recommend a performance level if so.

The recommended minimum performance level is:

A minimum performance level of 12 kWh per EVSE, over an eight (8) hour overnight period. Load

management and/or load sharing may be implemented.

Refer to Appendix G for details of the basis for the minimum performance levels.

Analysis indicates that a 40A 208V connection to each parking stall, with circuit sharing of up to four

stalls per branch circuit, or equivalent (additional chargers on a circuit of greater ampacity) is sufficient to

provide the minimum charging requirement. This is based on provision of load sharing to maximize

utilization of circuit ampacity, and to benefit from the capacity pooling effect of sharing, in lieu of

restricting each charger to a maximum of 25% of the circuit ampacity.


Page 5


The above statements should not be interpreted to preclude the use of alternate configurations to achieve

the minimum performance level. It is highlighted that it is not the intent to limit the options of designers,

only to establish a minimum performance level to be achieved. A minimum performance level is

necessary to ensure an appropriate experience for the EV owner, thereby encouraging EV adoption.

It is understood that the City may wish to entertain reduced performance requirements, including Level 1

charging, in some specific instances where average driving distances of residents of a specific building are

considered atypical/limited. It is highlighted that the industry is generally coalescing around Level 2

charging due to the reasons of performance requirements (average driving distances) and consumer

expectation. Level 2 charging is considerably more consistent with the objective to better enable wide-

spread adoption, and represents a lower initial infrastructure (not including EVSE) installation cost than

Level 1 charging where load sharing is implemented. Should there be specific instances where the City

considers reducing the requirement to Level 1 it is recommended that some level of performance

augmentation, such as the installation of a number of dedicated Level 2 or DC fast chargers, be

considered. Metering issues inherent with Level 1 charging would also need to be carefully considered in

any such instances.

3.3 ACCOMMODATING “LOAD MANAGEMENT” AND “LOAD SHARING”

As part of the Terms of Reference for this study, the City requested commentary on the following question:

Should the City make any special requirements to ensure that EV infrastructure configurations designed

for “load management” will be able to be used by building occupants? E.g. Should an EV charging

infrastructure design be shown to be compatible with specific EV charging service providers’ offerings (or

multiple different service providers)? Should a contractual relationship with an EV charging service

provider be demonstrated? The proponent should recommend any requirements appropriate for the City to

pursue during its development approvals process.

The recommendation is to not preclude “load management/load sharing” configurations, as many are

capable of achieving the minimum performance level, and are cost effective installations. The process of

amendment to CSA C22.1 (refer to Appendix F for further details) to clarify the allowance of load

management, is in progress. Requirements should allow designs to be based on any system capable of

achieving the minimum performance level, and not favor a specific vendor. Contractual relationship with

an EV charging service provider whilst to be encouraged for reasons of quality of service, is not necessarily

recommended for inclusion in City regulation. Requirements proposed for inclusion during the

development approvals process are the definitions and minimum performance levels.

Load sharing solutions provide the opportunity to significantly reduce infrastructure costs by avoiding the

inherent high costs of dedicated circuits. A Level 2 load sharing installation is less than one-third the cost


Page 6


of a dedicated circuit installation; and even less than a Level 1 dedicated circuit installation. Historically,

installations and Codes have been based on dedicated circuits. Analysis identifies there are significant

opportunities for cost reductions through the implementation of load management and load sharing

solutions.

The trade-off for the cost benefit is reduced performance and restriction on EVSE selection. A minimum

performance level requirement, as designated in Section 3.2 addresses the performance issue. In terms

of EVSE selection, the equipment must be capable of load sharing, which means a networked EVSE, as

opposed to standalone. At present EVSE equipment from various manufacturers is not open protocol and

cannot work in a sharing arrangement with equipment from other manufacturers. This means a

requirement (at present) to select one manufacturer, at least for each shared circuit, and more

realistically/appropriately for each building.

Additional benefits of networked systems include monitoring and maintenance features, thereby

improving the experience for the EV owner, which better enables wide-spread adoption. It is anticipated

that in the future all chargers will be “smart chargers” with increased features and range of available

services and capabilities, eventually including open protocols to allow greater selection and

interconnection of equipment. It is also anticipated that capabilities will further develop in relation to

instantaneous monitoring of available building electrical capacity to maximize charging performance

whilst minimizing infrastructure costs.

3.4 B ILLING SYSTEMS

To ensure electricity consumption costs are appropriately apportioned to EV owners it is recommended

that revenue grade metering (one meter) be provided on electrical distribution equipment feeding EVSE

equipment. “Apportioning of costs” as opposed to “resale of electricity” may then be performed via

metering integral to the EVSE equipment. Alternatively, as is the case in 20 US states currently, “resale of

electricity” by the strata organization may be performed based on metering integral to EVSE equipment,

once issues with the BC Utilities Commission Act (and other regulations) are resolved.

3.5 MECHANISMS TO ENSURE AVAILABILITY OF CHARGING

The recommendation to avoid “Partial EV infrastructure” minimizes potential restrictions to charging

availability and avoids complexities inherent with parking stall re-assignment. However, it does not

eliminate all possible impediments to an EV driver being able to charge. Provincial “Right-to-Charge”

legislation similar to that enacted by the State of California (on September 21, 2014) would ensure

availability of charging to MURB residents. Costs associated with the purchase and installation of EVSE

equipment, electricity consumption costs, and ongoing maintenance of the EVSE equipment would be


Page 7


borne by the EV owner. Costs associated with “Energized” provisions would be borne by the developer of

the property. California’s Right-to-Charge legislation is included in Appendix H.

City of Richmond staff have noted their preference for effective provincial Right-to-Charge legislation to

ensure access to EV charging in buildings subject to EV infrastructure requirements. In the potential

absence of provincial action, City staff note that Right-to-Charge provisions may be included in strata

bylaws and/or covenant, which could be secured through rezoning and development approval processes.

Potential clauses for such mechanisms are included in Appendix H.

4.0 ASSESSMENT OF DIFFERENT EV INFRASTRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS

4.1 L IFE CYCLE COSTING

Analysis identifies the opportunities for significant cost savings through the implementation of load

managed and load shared solutions. While the life cycle cost for the 100% AC L1 “energized” (dedicated)

configuration represents the lowest cost over a 20-year period (due to the absence of the Level 2 charger

and EV service costs) it comes at the cost of performance. The 100% AC L2 “energized” (4-way load

shared and load managed) configuration represents the least expensive option assessed as achieving the

recommended minimum performance level. It also represents the least expensive initial cost of any

option (including the 100% AC L1 “energized” (dedicated) configuration), at an average of $561/stall for

the four archetypes.

EV service costs include all provider service charges, including incorporation into the provider system,

configuration of chargers, monitoring (operation, usage), control of access to chargers (users, time), 24/7

remote support, generation of reports, and software updates.

Refer to Appendix A for a complete summary of results of the costing analysis. Cost estimates were

primarily developed using RSMeans 2017, with additional review by Mott Electric GP.

4.2 QUALITATIVE COMMENTARY

In accordance with Section 3.2 a minimum performance level of 12 kWh (over an eight-hour period),

which corresponds to a 65km of charge range is considered a reasonable compromise between

performance and price, for a MURB installation in the City of Richmond.

The 100% AC L1 “energized” (dedicated) configuration provides the lowest charging rate at 1.4kW, and

the 100% AC L2 “energized” (dedicated) configuration provides the highest charging rate at 6.3kW. Refer

to Appendix G for details of charging rates for the various configurations.


Page 8


5.0 CONCLUSIONS

5.1 RECOMMENDATIONS

The cost analysis identifies the 100% AC L2 “energized” (4-way load shared and load managed)

configuration as a reasonable compromise between price and performance. It also avoids concerns

inherent with “Partial EV infrastructure” installations. Whilst it has been identified as a reasonable

solution, it should not preclude other configurations or favor a specific vendor. It is recommended that

alternate configurations that can reasonably be verified to achieve the minimum recommended

performance level for a specific installation, be deemed acceptable.

Solutions that provide an improved performance level are particularly encouraged, to inspire range

confidence and maximize the experience for the EV owner, thereby further encouraging EV adoption. For

example, a minimal provision (1% - 2% of stalls) of DC Fast charging (in suitably accessible locations) for

larger developments (>100 stalls), whilst not included in the recommendations, is encouraged for

consideration during the development process, to increase EV adoption, sustainability, and marketability

of the development.

It is understood the City may have the ability to offset costs associated with EV infrastructure through

reduction in the required/designated number of parking stalls. Through implementation of load managed

and load shared solutions (as opposed to dedicated circuits) the reduction in parking stalls necessary to

offset costs would be minimal (2% – 3%). A reduction in parking stall numbers would also be consistent

with the trend towards reduced vehicle ownership, increased sharing options and membership, and

associated potential future impacts of autonomous vehicles.

The larger disruptive technology of battery storage (which EV’s are a component) can be expected to play

a role in influencing charging infrastructure and EVSE equipment in the future. Autonomous and wireless

technologies are also expected to impact requirements in the longer-term.

We understand that the recommendations are likely to inspire considerable comment and debate from

the many and varied stakeholders. For this reason, we recommend further consultation with the various

stakeholders, to ensure appropriate opportunity for expression of opinions and due consideration, prior to

implementation of any final requirements. With the increasingly rapid developments inherent with this

disruptive technology, the perception of the recommendations is also likely to change within a short

period of time, and the consultation period would provide such time.

Electric Vehicle Charging Requirements – Analysis

City of Richmond


Appendix A Costing Analysis

Electric Vehicle Charging Requirements - Analysis

City of Richmond

Appendix A | Page 1

Floor AreaSuites/

Units

Parking

Stalls

Floors

(above

grade)

CapacityMax.

DemandLoading

ft2 No. No. No. $/ft

2 M$ kW kW %

High Rise - City Centre 100,000 100 108 14 250 25 825 290 35

Mid Rise - City Centre 100,000 100 126 6 220 22 835 375 45

Mid Rise - Outside City Centre 80,000 80 136 4 150 12 460 185 40

Townhouse - Outside City Centre 20,000 18 36 2 - 3 125 2.5 170 95 55

Construction CostArchetype

ARCHETYPE SUMMARY


City of Richmond

Appendix A | Page 2

$ % $/stall

1.

High Rise - City Centre 155,895 0.62 1,443

Mid Rise - City Centre 106,727 0.49 847

Mid Rise - Outside City Centre 119,796 1.00 881

Townhouse - Outside City Centre 4,522 0.18 126

2.


Mid Rise - City Centre 308,439 1.40 2,448

Mid Rise - Outside City Centre 314,756 2.62 2,314

Townhouse - Outside City Centre 95,588 3.82 2,655

3.





4.





5.





6.

High Rise - City Centre 82,049 0.33 760




7.





8.





9.

High Rise - City Centre 83,184 0.33 770




COST SUMMARY

100% AC L2 "energized" (dedicated, load managed)

100% AC L2 "energized" (18-way load shared, 80A)

100% AC L2 "energized" (4-way load shared & load managed)

InstallationCost

100% AC L1 "energized" (dedicated)


100% AC L2 "energized" (2-way load shared)


100% AC L2 "energized" (panel shared)



City of Richmond

Appendix A | Page 3

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

HIGH RISE - CITY CENTRE MID RISE - CITY CENTRE MID RISE - OUTSIDE CITY CENTRE TOWNHOUSE - OUTSIDE CITY

CENTRE

Initial Cost ($/stall)

100% AC L1 "energized"

(dedicated)


(dedicated)


(dedicated, load

managed)


(2-way load shared)


(4-way load shared)


(4-way load shared &

load managed)


(panel shared)


(12-way load shared,

150A)


(18-way load shared,

80A)


City of Richmond

Appendix A | Page 4

824

2,610

1,615

1,174

751

561

1,184 1,193

711

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

100% AC L1

"ENERGIZED"

(DEDICATED)

100% AC L2

"ENERGIZED"

(DEDICATED)

100% AC L2

"ENERGIZED"

(DEDICATED,

LOAD MANAGED)

100% AC L2

"ENERGIZED" (2-

WAY LOAD

SHARED)

100% AC L2

"ENERGIZED" (4-

WAY LOAD

SHARED)

100% AC L2

"ENERGIZED" (4-

WAY LOAD

SHARED & LOAD

MANAGED)

100% AC L2

"ENERGIZED"

(PANEL SHARED)

100% AC L2

"ENERGIZED" (12-

WAY LOAD

SHARED, 150A)

100% AC L2

"ENERGIZED" (18-

WAY LOAD

SHARED, 80A)

Average Initial Cost ($/stall)


City of Richmond

Appendix A | Page 5

Infrastructure ChargerEV Service

(20 years)Total

1.

High Rise - City Centre 1,443 0 0 1,443

Mid Rise - City Centre 847 0 0 847

Mid Rise - Outside City Centre 881 0 0 881

Townhouse - Outside City Centre 126 0 0 126

2.

High Rise - City Centre 3,023 2,000 6,000 11,023

Mid Rise - City Centre 2,448 2,000 6,000 10,448

Mid Rise - Outside City Centre 2,314 2,000 6,000 10,314

Townhouse - Outside City Centre 2,655 2,000 6,000 10,655

3.




Townhouse - Outside City Centre 307 2,000 6,000 8,307

4.





5.


Mid Rise - City Centre 628 2,000 6,000 8,628

Mid Rise - Outside City Centre 638 2,000 6,000 8,638


6.

High Rise - City Centre 760 2,000 6,000 8,760




7.





8.





9.

High Rise - City Centre 770 2,000 6,000 8,770




Cost ($/stall)


COST SUMMARY - LIFE CYCLE



Installation




100% AC L2 "energized" (4-way load shared & load managed)

100% AC L2 "energized" (panel shared)


Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure Requirements

City of Richmond

Appendix A | Page 6

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

HIGH RISE - CITY CENTRE MID RISE - CITY CENTRE MID RISE - OUTSIDE CITY CENTRE TOWNHOUSE - OUTSIDE CITY

CENTRE

20-Year Life Cycle Cost ($/stall)

100% AC L1

"energized" (dedicated)

100% AC L2

"energized" (dedicated)

100% AC L2

"energized" (dedicated,

load managed)

100% AC L2

"energized" (2-way load

shared)

100% AC L2


shared)

100% AC L2


shared & load

managed)100% AC L2

"energized" (panel

shared)

100% AC L2

"energized" (12-way

load shared, 150A)

100% AC L2

"energized" (18-way

load shared, 80A)


City of Richmond

Appendix A | Page 7

824

10,610

9,615

9,174

8,7518,561

9,184 9,193

8,711

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

100% AC L1

"ENERGIZED"

(DEDICATED)

100% AC L2

"ENERGIZED"

(DEDICATED)

100% AC L2

"ENERGIZED"

(DEDICATED,

LOAD MANAGED)

100% AC L2

"ENERGIZED" (2-

WAY LOAD

SHARED)

100% AC L2

"ENERGIZED" (4-

WAY LOAD

SHARED)

100% AC L2

"ENERGIZED" (4-

WAY LOAD

SHARED & LOAD

MANAGED)

100% AC L2

"ENERGIZED"

(PANEL SHARED)

100% AC L2

"ENERGIZED" (12-

WAY LOAD

SHARED, 150A)

100% AC L2

"ENERGIZED" (18-

WAY LOAD

SHARED, 80A)

Average 20-Year Life Cycle Cost ($/stall)


City of Richmond

Appendix A | Page 8

108

25,000,000

825

207

1,032

No. QTY COST (∆$)

1 1 21,319

2 1 7,160

3 1 2,921

4 1 12,949

5 1 9,440

6 4 10,849

7 4 2,018

8 4 5,015

9 4 19,106

10 18 18,166

11 18 34,453

12 50 12,500

Cost (∆$) 155,895

Cost (∆%) 0.62

Cost ($ per stall) 1,443

100% AC L1 "energized" (dedicated, no load management)

100 ft of 2" conduit

Additional electrical room area (ft2)

200 A, 208Y/120V switchboard circuit breaker

Increase (kW):

Archetype 1 - High Rise - City Centre

DESCRIPTION

Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

800 A, 208Y/120V switchboard (No Main)

50 ft of 2" conduit

225 A main lugs, 208Y/120V, 42 cct panelboard (with 20 A circuit breakers)

50 ft of 4#3/0

6 sets of (100 ft of 2#8 + 1#10B)

Final load (kW):

Increase rating of 25kV - 600Y/347V main transformer from 1,000 kVA to 1,500 kVA

Increase rating of main switchboard (and main breaker) from 800 A to 1,200 A

225 kVA, 600V - 208Y/120V transformer



City of Richmond

Appendix A | Page 9


126

22,000,000

835

242

1,077

No. QTY COST (∆$)

1 1 3,951

2 0 -

3 4 10,849

4 4 2,018

5 4 5,015

6 4 19,106

7 21 21,193

8 21 40,195

9 20 4,400

Cost (∆$) 106,727

Cost (∆%) 0.49

Cost ($ per stall) 847

3,000 A main switchboard (no change)


200 A switchboard circuit breaker



6 sets of (100 ft of 2#8 + 1#10B)

50 ft of 2" conduit

Final load (kW):

Base load (kW):

DESCRIPTION

Increase (kW):


Archetype 2 - Mid Rise - City Centre

Stalls:

Base cost ($):

50 ft of 4#3/0


City of Richmond

Appendix A | Page 10


136

12,000,000

461

261

722

No. QTY COST (∆$)

1 1 7,571

2 1 2,078

3 4 10,849

4 4 2,018

5 4 5,015

6 4 19,106

7 24 24,221

8 24 45,937

9 20 3,000

Cost (∆$) 119,796

Cost (∆%) 1.00




Increase rating of 25kV - 208Y/120V main transformer from 500 kVA to 750 kVA

Increase rating of main switchboard (and main breaker) from 1,600 A to 2,000 A

Archetype 3 - Mid Rise - Outside City

Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):


DESCRIPTION

50 ft of 4#3/0


50 ft of 2" conduit

6 sets of (100ft of 2#8 + 1#10B)


City of Richmond



36

2,500,000

170

69

239

No. QTY COST ($)

1 1 3,083

2 18 667

3 18 772

Cost (∆$) 4,522

Cost (∆%) 0.18


Archetype 4 - Townhouse - Outside City

2 sets of (10 ft of 2#12 + 1#12B)

DESCRIPTION

Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):

10 ft of ¾" conduit



City of Richmond


108

25,000,000

825

718

1,543

No. QTY COST (∆$)

1 1 35,876

2 1 28,427

3 1 9,426

4 1 36,068

5 1 12,497

6 8 40,736

7 8 8,074

8 8 20,059

9 8 36,136

10 54 27,216

11 54 34,453

12 150 37,500

Cost (∆$) 326,467

Cost (∆%) 1.31





Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION




2,000 A, 208Y/120V switchboard


50 ft of two parallel 4#3/0


2 sets of (100ft of 2#8 + 1#10B)


50 ft of two 2" conduit



City of Richmond



126

22,000,000

835

838

1,673

No. QTY COST (∆$)

1 1 18,203

2 1 65,033

3 10 50,920

4 10 10,092

5 10 25,074

6 10 45,170

7 63 31,752

8 63 40,195

9 100 22,000

Cost (∆$) 308,439

Cost (∆%) 1.40


Increase (kW):


Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION


Additional 3,000 A main switchboard section (and main breaker)




2 sets of (100ft of 2#8 + 1#10B)





City of Richmond



136

12,000,000

461

904

1,365

No. QTY COST (∆$)

1 1 25,810

2 1 65,033

3 10 50,920

4 10 10,092

4 10 25,074

5 10 45,170

7 68 34,272

6 68 43,385

7 100 15,000

Cost (∆$) 314,756

Cost (∆%) 2.62


Stalls:



Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION

Increase rating of 25kV - 208Y/120V main transformer from 500 kVA to 1,500 kVA





2 sets of (100ft of 2#8 + 1#10B)




City of Richmond



36

2,500,000

170

239

409

No. QTY COST (∆$)

1 1 23,636

2 1 10,515

3 18 24,042

4 18 20,339

5 18 15,000

6 18 907

7 18 1,148

Cost (∆$) 95,588

Cost (∆%) 3.82


Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION


Increase rating of panelboards from 100 A to 200 A


Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

2 sets of (10 ft of 2#8 + 1#10B)

10 ft of 1" conduit


Increase rating of switchboard circuit breakers from 100 A to 200 A

Increase size of 100 ft feeders from 3#3 to 3#3/0


City of Richmond


108

25,000,000

825

718 available

825

No. QTY COST (∆$)

1 1 9,426

2 1 36,068

3 1 12,497

4 8 40,736

5 8 8,074

6 8 20,059

7 8 36,136

8 54 27,216

9 54 34,453

10 150 37,500

11 1 2,000

Cost (∆$) 264,165

Cost (∆%) 1.06


Load management


Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION









2 sets of (100 ft of 2#8 + 1#10B)

EVSE (kW):



Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):


City of Richmond



126

22,000,000

835

838 available

835

No. QTY COST (∆$)

1 1 15,834

2 10 50,920

3 10 10,092

4 10 25,074

5 10 45,170

6 63 31,752

7 63 40,195

8 100 22,000

9 1 2,000

Cost (∆$) 243,037

Cost (∆%) 1.10





2 sets of (100 ft of 2#8 + 1#10B)


Load management



Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

EVSE (kW):

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION

Additional 3,000 A main switchboard section



City of Richmond



136

12,000,000

461

904 available

461

No. QTY COST (∆$)

1 1 15,834

2 10 50,920

3 10 10,092

4 10 25,074

5 10 45,170

6 68 34,272

7 68 43,385

8 100 15,000

9 1 2,000

Cost (∆$) 241,747

Cost (∆%) 2.01


Load management

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION

Additional 3,000 A main switchboard section






2 sets of (100 ft of 2#8 + 1#10B)


EVSE (kW):


Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):


City of Richmond



36

2,500,000

170

239 available

170

No. QTY COST (∆$)

1 18 907

2 18 1,148

3 18 9,000

Cost (∆$) 11,056

Cost (∆%) 0.44


DESCRIPTION

Load management


Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

EVSE (kW):

Final load (kW):

10 ft of 1" conduit

2 sets of (10 ft of 2#8 + 1#10B)


City of Richmond


108

25,000,000

825

359

1,184

No. QTY COST (∆$)

1 1 21,319

2 1 7,160

3 1 5,092

4 1 22,815

5 1 11,365

6 4 20,368

7 4 4,037

8 4 10,030

9 4 18,068

10 28 14,112

11 28 17,865

12 100 25,000

Cost (∆$) 177,229

Cost (∆%) 0.71





Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION










2 sets of (100ft of 2#8 + 1#10B)



City of Richmond



126

22,000,000

835

419

1,254

No. QTY COST (∆$)

1 1 3,951

2 1 27,956

3 6 30,552

4 6 6,055

5 6 15,044

6 6 27,102

7 32 16,128

8 32 20,417

9 50 11,000

Cost (∆$) 158,205

Cost (∆%) 0.72


Base cost ($):


Stalls:

2 sets of (100ft of 2#8 + 1#10B)

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION










City of Richmond



136

12,000,000

461

452

913

No. QTY COST (∆$)

1 1 21,859

2 1 15,811

3 5 25,460

4 5 5,046

5 5 12,537

6 5 22,585

7 34 17,136

8 34 21,693

9 20 3,000

Cost (∆$) 145,126

Cost (∆%) 1.21




Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION







2 sets of (100ft of 2#8 + 1#10B)



City of Richmond



36

2,500,000

170

120

290

No. QTY COST (∆$)

1 1 3,083

2 1 3,355

3 18 8,474

4 18 5,811

5 18 3,600

6 18 907

7 18 1,148

Cost (∆$) 26,379

Cost (∆%) 1.06


Increase (kW):


Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):


10 ft of 1" conduit

2 sets of (10 ft of 2#8 + 1#10B)

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION


Increase rating of main switchboard (and main breaker) from 600 A to 800 A


Increase size of 100 ft feeders from 3#3 to 3#1


City of Richmond


108

25,000,000

825

180

1,005

No. QTY COST (∆$)

1 1 21,319

2 1 7,160

3 1 2,921

4 1 12,949

5 1 9,440

6 2 10,184

7 2 2,018

8 2 5,015

9 2 9,034

10 14 7,056

11 14 8,932

12 50 12,500

Cost (∆$) 108,528

Cost (∆%) 0.43


800 A, 208Y/120V switchboard






2 sets of (100ft of 2#8 + 1#10B)





Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION





City of Richmond



126

22,000,000

835

209

1,044

No. QTY COST (∆$)

1 1 3,951

2 0 -

3 4 20,368

4 4 4,037

5 4 10,030

6 4 18,068

7 16 8,064

8 16 10,208

9 20 4,400

Cost (∆$) 79,126

Cost (∆%) 0.36








2 sets of (100ft of 2#8 + 1#10B)


Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION


Base cost ($):


Stalls:


City of Richmond



136

12,000,000

461

226

687

No. QTY COST (∆$)

1 1 7,571

2 1 4,221

3 4 20,368

4 4 4,037

5 4 10,030

6 4 18,068

7 17 8,568

8 17 10,846

9 20 3,000

Cost (∆$) 86,709

Cost (∆%) 0.72



Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION








2 sets of (100ft of 2#8 + 1#10B)

Base load (kW):


Stalls:

Base cost ($):


City of Richmond



36

2,500,000

170

120

290

No. QTY COST (∆$)

1 1 3,083

2 1 3,355

3 18 8,474

4 18 5,811

5 18 3,600

6 18 907

7 18 1,148

Cost (∆$) 26,379

Cost (∆%) 1.06



10 ft of 1" conduit

2 sets of (10 ft of 2#8 + 1#10B)

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION






Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):


City of Richmond


108

25,000,000

825

180

1,005

No. QTY COST (∆$)

1 1 21,319

2 1 7,160

3 1 2,921

4 1 12,949

5 1 9,440

6 4 11,682

7 4 2,018

8 4 5,015

9 4 27,930

10 54 27,216

11 54 34,453

12 50 12,500

Cost (∆$) 174,603

Cost (∆%) 0.70




50 ft of 2" conduit

50 ft of 4#3/0



2 sets of (100ft of 2#8 + 1#10B)



100% AC L2 "energized" (dedicated, panel shared /4)


Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION





City of Richmond



126

22,000,000

835

209

1,044

No. QTY COST (∆$)

1 1 3,951

2 0 -

3 5 25,460

4 5 2,523

5 5 6,269

6 5 34,913

7 63 31,752

8 63 40,195

9 20 4,400

Cost (∆$) 149,462

Cost (∆%) 0.68



2 sets of (100ft of 2#8 + 1#10B)

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION




50 ft of 2" conduit

50 ft of 4#3/0



Base cost ($):


Stalls:


City of Richmond



136

12,000,000

461

226

687

No. QTY COST (∆$)

1 1 7,571

2 1 4,221

3 5 25,460

4 5 2,523

5 5 6,269

6 5 34,913

7 68 34,272

8 68 43,385

9 20 4,400

Cost (∆$) 163,014

Cost (∆%) 1.36


50 ft of 2" conduit

50 ft of 4#3/0



2 sets of (100ft of 2#8 + 1#10B)




Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION




City of Richmond



36

2,500,000

170

120

290

No. QTY COST (∆$)

1 1 3,083

2 1 3,355

3 18 8,474

4 18 5,811

5 18 3,600

6 18 907

7 18 1,148

Cost (∆$) 26,379

Cost (∆%) 1.06



10 ft of 1" conduit

2 sets of (10 ft of 2#8 + 1#10B)

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION





Increase (kW):


Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):


City of Richmond


108

25,000,000

825

180 available

825

No. QTY COST (∆$)

1 1 2,921

2 1 12,949

3 1 9,440

4 2 10,184

5 2 2,018

6 2 5,015

7 2 9,034

8 14 7,056

9 14 8,932

10 50 12,500

11 1 2,000

Cost (∆$) 82,049

Cost (∆%) 0.33


Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION


EVSE (kW):

100% AC L2 "energized" (4-way load shared, load managed)


Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):








2 sets of (100ft of 2#8 + 1#10B)


Load management


City of Richmond



126

22,000,000

835

209 available

835

No. QTY COST (∆$)

1 4 20,368

2 4 4,037

3 4 10,030

4 4 18,068

5 16 8,064

6 16 10,208

7 20 4,400

8 1 2,000

Cost (∆$) 77,175

Cost (∆%) 0.35


Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION

Base load (kW):

EVSE (kW):



Load management


2 sets of (100ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) in 1" conduit





Stalls:

Base cost ($):


City of Richmond



136

12,000,000

461

226 available

461

No. QTY COST (∆$)

1 4 20,368

2 4 4,037

3 4 10,030

4 4 18,068

5 17 8,568

6 17 10,846

7 20 3,000

8 1 2,000

Cost (∆$) 76,917

Cost (∆%) 0.64


Load management



EVSE (kW):

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION





2 sets of (100ft of 2#8 + 1#10B)

Base load (kW):


Stalls:

Base cost ($):


City of Richmond



36

2,500,000

170

120 available

170

No. QTY COST (∆$)

1 18 907

2 18 1,148

3 18 9,000

Cost (∆$) 11,056

Cost (∆%) 0.44


10 ft of 1" conduit

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION

Load management


Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

EVSE (kW):

2 sets of (10 ft of 2#8 + 1#10B)


City of Richmond


108

25,000,000

825

389

1,214

No. QTY COST (∆$)

1 1 21,319

2 1 7,160

3 1 5,092

4 1 22,815

5 1 11,365

6 9 19,217

7 9 14,990

8 9 27,165

9 108 19,764

10 108 4,005

11 108 3,445

12 50 12,500

Cost (∆$) 168,836

Cost (∆%) 0.68



200 ft of 1-1/2" conduit

200 ft of (3#2/0 + 1#6B)

40 A, 2-pole, circuit breaker in enclosure


10 ft of (2#8 + 1#10B)




100% AC L2 "energized" (12-way load shared, on 150A trunk)


Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION





City of Richmond



126

22,000,000

835

475

1,310

No. QTY COST (∆$)

1 1 3,951

2 1 49,222

3 11 23,487

4 11 18,322

5 11 33,202

6 126 23,058

7 126 4,672

8 126 4,020

9 20 5,000

Cost (∆$) 164,933

Cost (∆%) 0.75


200 ft of (3#2/0 + 1#6B)



Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):


DESCRIPTION


Additional 1,600 A switchboard (with main breaker)



10 ft of (2#8 + 1#10B)



City of Richmond



136

12,000,000

461

518

979

No. QTY COST (∆$)

1 1 21,859

2 1 15,811

3 12 25,622

4 12 19,987

5 12 36,220

6 136 24,888

7 136 5,043

8 136 4,339

9 20 5,000

Cost (∆$) 158,768

Cost (∆%) 1.32




Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION





10 ft of (2#8 + 1#10B)


200 ft of (3#2/0 + 1#6B)



City of Richmond



36

2,500,000

170

120

290

No. QTY COST (∆$)

1 1 3,083

2 1 3,355

3 18 8,474

4 18 5,811

5 18 3,600

6 18 907

7 18 1,148

Cost (∆$) 26,379

Cost (∆%) 1.06


Stalls:


2 sets of (10 ft of 2#8 + 1#10B)

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION





10 ft of 1" conduit



City of Richmond


108

25,000,000

825

80

905

No. QTY COST (∆$)

1 1 -

2 1 7,160

3 1 1,847

4 1 7,684

5 1 1,009

6 1 2,507

7 1 2,522

8 6 1,895

9 6 8,323

10 6 10,523

11 108 19,764

12 108 4,005

13 108 3,445

14 50 12,500

Cost (∆$) 83,184

Cost (∆%) 0.33



112.5 kVA, 600V - 208Y/120V transformer

80 A, 2p circuit breakers



10 ft of (2#8 + 1#10B)


Increase (kW):



Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):


400 A main lugs, 208Y/120V, 42 cct panelboard (lugs only)


200 ft of (2#1 + 1#6B)

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION

1,000 kVA, 25kV - 600Y/347V main transformer (no change)




City of Richmond



126

22,000,000

835

93

928

No. QTY COST (∆$)

1 1 -

2 1 -

3 1 5,092

4 1 1,009

5 1 2,507

6 1 2,522

7 7 2,210

8 7 9,710

9 7 12,277

10 126 23,058

11 126 4,672

12 126 4,020

13 20 5,000

Cost (∆$) 72,078

Cost (∆%) 0.33







200 ft of (2#1 + 1#6B)





10 ft of (2#8 + 1#10B)



Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION

1,000 kVA, 25kV - 600Y/347V main transformer (no change)


City of Richmond



136

12,000,000

461

120

581

No. QTY COST (∆$)

1 1 7,571

2 1 4,221

3 2 10,184

4 2 2,018

5 2 5,015

6 2 5,044

7 9 2,842

8 9 12,485

9 9 15,785

10 136 24,888

11 136 5,043

12 136 4,339

13 20 5,000

Cost (∆$) 104,434

Cost (∆%) 0.87




Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION






200 ft of (2#1 + 1#6B)





Base load (kW):


Stalls:

Base cost ($):

10 ft of (2#8 + 1#10B)


City of Richmond



36

2,500,000

170

120

290

No. QTY COST (∆$)

1 1 3,083

2 1 3,355

3 18 8,474

4 18 5,811

5 18 3,600

6 18 907

7 18 1,148

Cost (∆$) 26,379

Cost (∆%) 1.06



10 ft of 1" conduit

2 sets of (10 ft of 2#8 + 1#10B)

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION






Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):


City of Richmond


Appendix B Costing Analysis – Partial Infrastructure


City of Richmond

Appendix B | Page 1


108

22

25,000,000

825

718

1,543

No. QTY COST (∆$) QTY COST (∆$) QTY MULT COST

1 Increase rating of 25kV - 600Y/347V main transformer from 1,000 kVA to 2,000 kVA 1 35,876 1 35,876 0 7.5 -

2 Increase rating of main switchboard (and main breaker) from 800 A to 1,600 A 1 28,427 1 28,427 0 7.5 -

3 800 A, 600Y/347V switchboard circuit breaker 1 9,426 1 9,426 0 3.0 -

4 750 kVA, 600V - 208Y/120V transformer 1 36,068 1 36,068 0 3.0 -

5 2,000 A, 208Y/120V switchboard 1 12,497 1 12,497 0 5.0 -


7 50 ft of two 2" conduit 8 8,074 8 8,074 0 5.0 -

8 50 ft of two parallel 4#3/0 8 20,059 8 20,059 0 3.0 -

9 400 A main lugs, 208Y/120V, 42 cct panelboard (with 40 A circuit breakers) 8 36,136 8 36,136 0 3.0 -

10 100 ft of 1" conduit 54 27,216 54 27,216 0 5.0 -

11 2 sets of (100ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 54 34,453 11 7,018 43 3.0 82,305

12 Additional electrical room area (ft2) 150 37,500 150 37,500 0 10.0 -

Cost (∆$) 326,467 299,033 82,305

Cost (∆%) 1.31 1.20

Cost ($ per energized stall) 3,023 13,592 957

Energized Partial

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION

AC L2 Energized vs Partial, dedicated, with conduits

Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Later Costs

Stalls (20%):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):


City of Richmond

Appendix B | Page 2

Energized Partial


Later Costs


126

26

22,000,000

835

838

1,673



2 Additional 3,000 A main switchboard section (and main breaker) 1 65,033 1 65,033 0 7.5 -

3 400 A switchboard circuit breaker 10 50,920 10 50,920 0 3.0 -

4 50 ft of two 2" conduit 10 10,092 10 10,092 0 5.0 -



7 100 ft of 1" conduit 63 31,752 63 31,752 0 5.0 -

8 2 sets of (100ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 63 40,195 13 8,294 50 3.0 95,703


Cost (∆$) 308,439 276,538 95,703

Cost (∆%) 1.40 1.26


Stalls (20%):

DESCRIPTION

Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):


City of Richmond

Appendix B | Page 3

Energized Partial


Later Costs


136

28

12,000,000

461

904

1,365


1 Increase rating of 25kV - 208Y/120V main transformer from 500 kVA to 1,500 kVA 1 25,810 1 25,810 0 7.5 -



4 50 ft of two 2" conduit 10 10,092 10 10,092 0 5.0 -



7 100 ft of 1" conduit 68 34,272 68 34,272 0 5.0 -

6 2 sets of (100ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 68 43,385 14 8,932 54 3.0 103,359


Cost (∆$) 314,756 280,303 103,359

Cost (∆%) 2.62 2.34


Stalls (20%):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Stalls:


City of Richmond

Appendix B | Page 4

Energized Partial


Later Costs


36

18

2,500,000

170

239

409


1 Increase rating of 25kV - 208Y/120V main transformer from 225 kVA to 500 kVA 1 23,636 1 23,636 0 7.5 -


3 Increase rating of switchboard circuit breakers from 100 A to 200 A 18 24,042 18 24,042 0 3.0 -

4 Increase size of 100 ft feeders from 3#3 to 3#3/0 18 20,339 18 20,339 0 3.0 -

5 Increase rating of panelboards from 100 A to 200 A 18 15,000 18 15,000 0 3.0 -

6 10 ft of 1" conduit 18 907 18 907 0 5.0 -

7 2 sets of (10 ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 18 1,148 9 574 9 3.0 1,723

Cost (∆$) 95,588 95,014 1,723

Cost (∆%) 3.82 3.80


Stalls (50%):

Stalls:

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION

Base cost ($):


City of Richmond

Appendix B | Page 5


108

22

25,000,000

825

718

1,543






5 2,000 A, 208Y/120V switchboard 1 12,497 1 12,497 0 5.0 -

6 400 A, 208Y/120V switchboard circuit breaker 8 40,736 2 10,184 6 3.0 91,657

7 50 ft of two 2" conduit 8 8,074 2 2,018 6 5.0 30,276

8 50 ft of two parallel 4#3/0 8 20,059 2 5,015 6 2.0 30,089

9 400 A main lugs, 208Y/120V, 42 cct panelboard (with 40 A circuit breakers) 8 36,136 2 9,034 6 3.0 81,305

10 100 ft of 1" conduit 54 27,216 11 5,544 43 5.0 108,360

11 2 sets of (100ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 54 34,453 11 7,018 43 2.0 54,870


Cost (∆$) 326,467 198,607 396,557

Cost (∆%) 1.31 0.79

Cost ($ per energized stall) 3,023 9,028 4,611

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION

AC L2 Energized vs Partial, dedicated, without conduits

Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Stalls (20%):

Energized Partial Later Costs


City of Richmond

Appendix B | Page 6




126

26

22,000,000

835

838

1,673




3 400 A switchboard circuit breaker 10 50,920 2 10,184 8 3.0 122,209

4 50 ft of two 2" conduit 10 10,092 2 2,018 8 5.0 40,368



7 100 ft of 1" conduit 63 31,752 13 6,552 50 5.0 126,000

8 2 sets of (100ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 63 40,195 13 8,294 50 2.0 63,802


Cost (∆$) 308,439 146,333 500,905

Cost (∆%) 1.40 0.67


DESCRIPTION

Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):

Stalls (20%):


City of Richmond

Appendix B | Page 7




136

28

12,000,000

461

904

1,365





4 50 ft of two 2" conduit 10 10,092 2 2,018 8 5.0 40,368



7 100 ft of 1" conduit 68 34,272 14 7,056 54 5.0 136,080

6 2 sets of (100ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 68 43,385 14 8,932 54 2.0 68,906


Cost (∆$) 314,756 148,082 516,089

Cost (∆%) 2.62 1.23


Stalls (20%):

Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION


City of Richmond

Appendix B | Page 8




36

18

2,500,000

170

239

409





4 Increase size of 100 ft feeders from 3#3 to 3#3/0 18 20,339 18 20,339 0 3.0 -


6 10 ft of 1" conduit 18 907 18 907 0 5.0 -

7 2 sets of (10 ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 18 1,148 9 574 9 3.0 1,723

Cost (∆$) 95,588 95,014 1,723

Cost (∆%) 3.82 3.80


Stalls (50%):

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION

Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):


City of Richmond

Appendix B | Page 9

326308 315

96

299

199

277

146

280

148

95 95

82

397

96

501

103

516

2 2

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

L2 Dedicated

Energized vs Partial (Total Cost k$)

80% Future/Retrofit

20% Partial Infrastructure

100% Energized


City of Richmond

Appendix B | Page 10


108

22

25,000,000

825

718 available

825




3 2,000 A, 208Y/120V switchboard 1 12,497 1 12,497 0 5.0 -


5 50 ft of two 2" conduit 8 8,074 8 8,074 0 5.0 -



8 100 ft of 1" conduit 54 27,216 54 27,216 0 5.0 -

9 2 sets of (100 ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 54 34,453 11 7,018 43 3.0 82,305


11 Load management 1 2,000 1 2,000 0 3.0 -

Cost (∆$) 264,165 236,730 82,305

Cost (∆%) 1.06 0.95


DESCRIPTION

Final load (kW):

AC L2 Energized vs Partial, dedicated and load managed, with conduits

Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

EVSE (kW):

Stalls (20%):



City of Richmond





126

26

22,000,000

835

838 available

835


1 Additional 3,000 A main switchboard section 1 15,834 1 15,834 0 7.5 -


3 50 ft of two 2" conduit 10 10,092 10 10,092 0 5.0 -



6 100 ft of 1" conduit 63 31,752 63 31,752 0 5.0 -

7 2 sets of (100 ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 63 40,195 13 8,294 50 3.0 95,703


9 Load management 1 2,000 1 2,000 0 3.0 -

Cost (∆$) 243,037 211,136 95,703

Cost (∆%) 1.10 0.96


Stalls:

Base load (kW):

EVSE (kW):

Final load (kW):

Base cost ($):

Stalls (20%):

DESCRIPTION


City of Richmond





136

28

12,000,000

461

904 available

461




3 50 ft of two 2" conduit 10 10,092 10 10,092 0 5.0 -



6 100 ft of 1" conduit 68 34,272 68 34,272 0 5.0 -

7 2 sets of (100 ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 68 43,385 14 8,932 54 3.0 103,359


9 Load management 1 2,000 1 2,000 0 3.0 -

Cost (∆$) 241,747 207,294 103,359

Cost (∆%) 2.01 1.73


Base load (kW):

EVSE (kW):

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION

Base cost ($):

Stalls:

Stalls (20%):


City of Richmond





36

18

2,500,000

170

239 available

170


1 10 ft of 1" conduit 18 907 18 907 0 5.0 -

2 2 sets of (10 ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 18 1,148 9 574 9 3.0 1,723

3 Load management 18 9,000 18 9,000 0 3.0 -

Cost (∆$) 11,056 10,481 1,723

Cost (∆%) 0.44 0.42

Cost ($ per energized stall) 307 582 96

Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Stalls (50%):

Base load (kW):

EVSE (kW):

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION


City of Richmond



108

22

25,000,000

825

718 available

825




3 2,000 A, 208Y/120V switchboard 1 12,497 1 12,497 0 7.5 -


5 50 ft of two 2" conduit 8 8,074 2 2,018 6 5.0 30,276



8 100 ft of 1" conduit 54 27,216 11 5,544 43 5.0 108,360

9 2 sets of (100 ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 54 34,453 11 7,018 43 2.0 54,870


11 Load management 1 2,000 1 2,000 0 3.0 -

Cost (∆$) 264,165 136,304 396,557

Cost (∆%) 1.06 0.55


DESCRIPTION

Final load (kW):

AC L2 Energized vs Partial, dedicated and load managed, without conduits

Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

EVSE (kW):

Stalls (20%):



City of Richmond





126

26

22,000,000

835

838 available

835




3 50 ft of two 2" conduit 10 10,092 2 2,018 8 5.0 40,368



6 100 ft of 1" conduit 63 31,752 13 6,552 50 5.0 126,000

7 2 sets of (100 ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 63 40,195 13 8,294 50 2.0 63,802


9 Load management 1 2,000 1 2,000 0 3.0 -

Cost (∆$) 243,037 80,931 500,905

Cost (∆%) 1.10 0.37


Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

EVSE (kW):

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION

Stalls (20%):


City of Richmond





136

28

12,000,000

461

904 available

461




3 50 ft of two 2" conduit 10 10,092 2 2,018 8 5.0 40,368



6 100 ft of 1" conduit 68 34,272 14 7,056 54 5.0 136,080

7 2 sets of (100 ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 68 43,385 14 8,932 54 2.0 68,906


9 Load management 1 2,000 1 2,000 0 3.0 -

Cost (∆$) 241,747 75,073 516,089

Cost (∆%) 2.01 0.63


Base load (kW):

EVSE (kW):

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION

Base cost ($):

Stalls:

Stalls (20%):


City of Richmond





36

18

2,500,000

170

239 available

170


1 10 ft of 1" conduit 18 907 18 907 0 5.0 -

2 2 sets of (10 ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 18 1,148 9 574 9 3.0 1,723

3 Load management 18 9,000 18 9,000 0 3.0 -

Cost (∆$) 11,056 10,481 1,723

Cost (∆%) 0.44 0.42


Base load (kW):

EVSE (kW):

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION

Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Stalls (50%):


City of Richmond


264243 242

11

237

136

211

81

207

75

10 10

82

397

96

501

103

516

2 2

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

L2 Dedicated and Load Managed


80% Future/Retrofit


100% Energized


City of Richmond



108

22

25,000,000

825

359

1,184






5 1,200 A, 208Y/120V switchboard 1 11,365 1 11,365 0 5.0 -


7 50 ft of two 2" conduit 4 4,037 4 4,037 0 5.0 -



10 100 ft of 1" conduit 28 14,112 28 14,112 0 5.0 -

11 2 sets of (100ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 28 17,865 6 3,828 22 3.0 42,109


Cost (∆$) 177,229 163,193 42,109

Cost (∆%) 0.71 0.65


Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION

AC L2 Energized vs Partial, 2-way shared, with conduits

Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Stalls (20%):



City of Richmond





126

26

22,000,000

835

419

1,254





4 50 ft of two 2" conduit 6 6,055 6 6,055 0 5.0 -



7 100 ft of 1" conduit 32 16,128 32 16,128 0 5.0 -

8 2 sets of (100ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 32 20,417 7 4,466 25 3.0 47,852


Cost (∆$) 158,205 142,254 47,852

Cost (∆%) 0.72 0.65


DESCRIPTION

Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):

Stalls (20%):


City of Richmond





136

28

12,000,000

461

452

913



2 Increase rating of main switchboard (and main breaker) from 1,600 A to 3,000 A 1 15,811 1 15,811 0 7.5 -


4 50 ft of two 2" conduit 5 5,046 5 5,046 0 5.0 -



7 100 ft of 1" conduit 34 17,136 34 17,136 0 5.0 -

8 2 sets of (100ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 34 21,693 7 4,466 27 3.0 51,680


Cost (∆$) 145,126 127,900 51,680

Cost (∆%) 1.21 1.07


Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):

Stalls (20%):

Stalls:

DESCRIPTION


City of Richmond





36

18

2,500,000

170

120

290



2 Increase rating of main switchboard (and main breaker) from 600 A to 800 A 1 3,355 1 3,355 0 7.5 -


4 Increase size of 100 ft feeders from 3#3 to 3#1 18 5,811 18 5,811 0 3.0 -


6 10 ft of 1" conduit 18 907 18 907 0 5.0 -

7 2 sets of (10 ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 18 1,148 9 574 9 3.0 1,723

Cost (∆$) 26,379 25,805 1,723

Cost (∆%) 1.06 1.03

Cost ($ per energized stall) 733 1,434 96

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION

Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Stalls (50%):


City of Richmond



108

22

25,000,000

825

359

1,184






5 1,200 A, 208Y/120V switchboard 1 11,365 1 11,365 0 5.0 -


7 50 ft of two 2" conduit 4 4,037 1 1,009 3 5.0 15,138



10 100 ft of 1" conduit 28 14,112 6 3,024 22 5.0 55,440

11 2 sets of (100ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 28 17,865 6 3,828 22 2.0 28,073


Cost (∆$) 177,229 112,728 200,176

Cost (∆%) 0.71 0.45


Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION

Stalls (20%):

Energized Partial

AC L2 Energized vs Partial, 2-way shared, without conduits

Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Later Costs


City of Richmond


Energized Partial


Later Costs


126

26

22,000,000

835

419

1,254





4 50 ft of two 2" conduit 6 6,055 1 1,009 5 5.0 25,230



7 100 ft of 1" conduit 32 16,128 7 3,528 25 5.0 63,000

8 2 sets of (100ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 32 20,417 7 4,466 25 2.0 31,901


Cost (∆$) 158,205 64,026 289,340

Cost (∆%) 0.72 0.29


DESCRIPTION

Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):

Stalls (20%):


City of Richmond


Energized Partial


Later Costs


136

28

12,000,000

461

452

913





4 50 ft of two 2" conduit 5 5,046 1 1,009 4 5.0 20,184



7 100 ft of 1" conduit 34 17,136 7 3,528 27 5.0 68,040

8 2 sets of (100ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 34 21,693 7 4,466 27 2.0 34,453


Cost (∆$) 145,126 61,789 258,044

Cost (∆%) 1.21 0.51


DESCRIPTION

Stalls (20%):

Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):


City of Richmond


Energized Partial


Later Costs


36

18

2,500,000

170

120

290







6 10 ft of 1" conduit 18 907 18 907 0 5.0 -

7 2 sets of (10 ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 18 1,148 9 574 9 3.0 1,723

Cost (∆$) 26,379 25,805 1,723

Cost (∆%) 1.06 1.03


DESCRIPTION

Stalls (50%):

Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):


City of Richmond


177

158

145

26

163

113

142

64

128

62

26 26

42

200

48

289

52

258

2 2

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

Two-Way Load Shared


80% Future/Retrofit


100% Energized


City of Richmond



108

22

25,000,000

825

180

1,005






5 800 A, 208Y/120V switchboard 1 9,440 1 9,440 0 5.0 -


7 50 ft of two 2" conduit 2 2,018 2 2,018 0 5.0 -



10 100 ft of 1" conduit 14 7,056 14 7,056 0 5.0 -

11 2 sets of (100ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 14 8,932 3 1,914 11 3.0 21,055


Cost (∆$) 108,528 101,509 21,055

Cost (∆%) 0.43 0.41




Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION

Stalls (20%):


City of Richmond





126

26

22,000,000

835

209

1,044



2 3,000 A main switchboard (no change) 0 - 0 - 0 7.5 -


4 50 ft of two 2" conduit 4 4,037 4 4,037 0 5.0 -



7 100 ft of 1" conduit 16 8,064 16 8,064 0 5.0 -

8 2 sets of (100ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 16 10,208 4 2,552 12 3.0 22,969


Cost (∆$) 79,126 71,470 22,969

Cost (∆%) 0.36 0.32


DESCRIPTION

Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):

Stalls (20%):


City of Richmond





136

28

12,000,000

461

226

687





4 50 ft of two 2" conduit 4 4,037 4 4,037 0 5.0 -



7 100 ft of 1" conduit 17 8,568 17 8,568 0 5.0 -

8 2 sets of (100ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 17 10,846 4 2,552 13 3.0 24,883


Cost (∆$) 86,709 78,415 24,883

Cost (∆%) 0.72 0.65


Stalls:

DESCRIPTION

Stalls (20%):

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):


City of Richmond





36

18

2,500,000

170

120

290







6 10 ft of 1" conduit 18 907 18 907 0 5.0 -

7 2 sets of (10 ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 18 1,148 9 574 9 3.0 1,723

Cost (∆$) 26,379 25,805 1,723

Cost (∆%) 1.06 1.03


DESCRIPTION

Stalls (50%):

Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):


City of Richmond



108

22

25,000,000

825

180

1,005






5 800 A, 208Y/120V switchboard 1 9,440 1 9,440 0 5.0 -


7 50 ft of two 2" conduit 2 2,018 1 1,009 1 5.0 5,046



10 100 ft of 1" conduit 14 7,056 3 1,512 11 5.0 27,720

11 2 sets of (100ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 14 8,932 3 1,914 11 2.0 14,036


Cost (∆$) 108,528 82,840 80,644

Cost (∆%) 0.43 0.33




Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION

Stalls (20%):


City of Richmond





126

26

22,000,000

835

209

1,044





4 50 ft of two 2" conduit 4 4,037 1 1,009 3 5.0 15,138



7 100 ft of 1" conduit 16 8,064 4 2,016 12 5.0 30,240

8 2 sets of (100ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 16 10,208 4 2,552 12 2.0 15,312


Cost (∆$) 79,126 26,045 162,216

Cost (∆%) 0.36 0.12

Cost ($ per energized stall) 628 1,002 1,622

DESCRIPTION

Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):

Stalls (20%):


City of Richmond





136

28

12,000,000

461

226

687





4 50 ft of two 2" conduit 4 4,037 1 1,009 3 5.0 15,138



7 100 ft of 1" conduit 17 8,568 4 2,016 13 5.0 32,760

8 2 sets of (100ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 17 10,846 4 2,552 13 2.0 16,589


Cost (∆$) 86,709 32,486 166,012

Cost (∆%) 0.72 0.27

Cost ($ per energized stall) 638 1,160 1,537

Stalls:

DESCRIPTION

Stalls (20%):

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):


City of Richmond





36

18

2,500,000

170

120

290







6 10 ft of 1" conduit 18 907 18 907 0 5.0 -

7 2 sets of (10 ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 18 1,148 9 574 9 3.0 1,723

Cost (∆$) 26,379 25,805 1,723

Cost (∆%) 1.06 1.03


DESCRIPTION

Stalls (50%):

Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):


City of Richmond


109

7987

26

102

83

71

26

78

3226 26

21

81

23

162

25

166

2 2

0

50

100

150

200

250

Four-Way Load Shared


80% Future/Retrofit


100% Energized


City of Richmond



108

22

25,000,000

825

180

1,214






5 800 A, 208Y/120V switchboard 1 9,440 1 9,440 0 5.0 -


7 50 ft of 2" conduit 4 2,018 4 2,018 0 5.0 -

8 50 ft of 4#3/0 4 5,015 4 5,015 0 3.0 -


10 100 ft of 1" conduit 54 27,216 54 27,216 0 5.0 -

11 2 sets of (100ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 54 34,453 11 7,018 43 3.0 82,305


Cost (∆$) 174,603 147,168 82,305

Cost (∆%) 0.70 0.59


AC L2 Energized vs Partial, 4-fold panel shared, with conduits


Stalls

Stalls (20%):

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION


City of Richmond





126

26

22,000,000

835

93

928





4 50 ft of 2" conduit 5 2,523 5 2,523 5 5.0 -

5 50 ft of 4#3/0 5 6,269 5 6,269 2 3.0 -


7 100 ft of 1" conduit 63 31,752 63 31,752 5 5.0 -

8 2 sets of (100ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 63 40,195 26 16,589 2 3.0 70,820


Cost (∆$) 149,462 125,856 70,820

Cost (∆%) 0.68 0.57


Stalls:

Stalls (20%):

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION


City of Richmond





136

28

12,000,000

461

120

581





4 50 ft of 2" conduit 5 2,523 5 2,523 0 5.0 -

5 50 ft of 4#3/0 5 6,269 5 6,269 0 3.0 -


7 100 ft of 1" conduit 68 34,272 68 34,272 0 5.0 -

8 2 sets of (100ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 68 43,385 28 17,865 40 3.0 76,562


Cost (∆$) 163,014 137,493 76,562

Cost (∆%) 1.36 1.15


Stalls:

Stalls (20%):

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION


City of Richmond





36

18

2,500,000

170

120

290







6 10 ft of 1" conduit 18 907 18 907 0 5.0 -

7 2 sets of (10 ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 18 1,148 9 574 9 3.0 1,723

Cost (∆$) 26,379 25,805 1,723

Cost (∆%) 1.06 1.03


Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION

Increase (kW):

Stalls:

Stalls (50%):

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):


City of Richmond



108

22

25,000,000

825

180

1,214






5 800 A, 208Y/120V switchboard 1 9,440 1 9,440 0 5.0 -


7 50 ft of 2" conduit 4 2,018 1 505 3 5.0 7,569

8 50 ft of 4#3/0 4 5,015 1 1,254 3 2.0 7,522


10 100 ft of 1" conduit 54 27,216 11 5,544 43 5.0 108,360

11 2 sets of (100ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 54 34,453 11 7,018 43 2.0 54,870


Cost (∆$) 174,603 90,512 267,449

Cost (∆%) 0.70 0.36


AC L2 Energized vs Partial, 4-fold panel shared, without conduits


Stalls

Stalls (20%):

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION


City of Richmond





126

26

22,000,000

835

93

928





4 50 ft of 2" conduit 5 2,523 1 505 5 5.0 10,092

5 50 ft of 4#3/0 5 6,269 1 1,254 2 2.0 10,030


7 100 ft of 1" conduit 63 31,752 26 13,104 5 5.0 93,240

8 2 sets of (100ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 63 40,195 26 16,589 2 2.0 47,213


Cost (∆$) 149,462 51,876 305,470

Cost (∆%) 0.68 0.24


Stalls:

Stalls (20%):

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION


City of Richmond





136

28

12,000,000

461

120

581





4 50 ft of 2" conduit 5 2,523 1 505 4 5.0 10,092

5 50 ft of 4#3/0 5 6,269 1 1,254 4 2.0 10,030


7 100 ft of 1" conduit 68 34,272 28 14,112 40 5.0 100,800

8 2 sets of (100ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 68 43,385 28 17,865 40 2.0 51,042


Cost (∆$) 163,014 62,002 316,858

Cost (∆%) 1.36 0.52


DESCRIPTION

Stalls:

Stalls (20%):

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):


City of Richmond





36

18

2,500,000

170

120

290







6 10 ft of 1" conduit 18 907 18 907 0 5.0 -

7 2 sets of (10 ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 18 1,148 9 574 9 3.0 1,723

Cost (∆$) 26,379 25,805 1,723

Cost (∆%) 1.06 1.03


DESCRIPTION

Final load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Stalls:

Stalls (50%):

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):


City of Richmond


175

149

163

26

147

91

126

52

137

62

26 26

82

267

71

305

77

317

2 2

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

Panel Shared


80% Future/Retrofit


100% Energized


City of Richmond



108

22

25,000,000

825

180 available

825




3 800 A, 208Y/120V switchboard 1 9,440 1 9,440 0 5.0 -


5 50 ft of two 2" conduit 2 2,018 2 2,018 0 5.0 -



8 100 ft of 1" conduit 14 7,056 14 7,056 0 5.0 -

9 2 sets of (100ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 14 8,932 3 1,914 11 3.0 21,055


11 Load management 1 2,000 1 2,000 0 3.0 -

Cost (∆$) 82,049 75,031 21,055

Cost (∆%) 0.33 0.30


Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION

Stalls (20%):

Energized Partial

AC L2 Energized vs Partial, 4-way shared and managed, with conduits

Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

EVSE (kW):

Later Costs


City of Richmond


Energized Partial


Later Costs


126

26

22,000,000

835

209 available

835



2 50 ft of two 2" conduit 4 4,037 4 4,037 0 5.0 -



5 100 ft of 1" conduit 16 8,064 16 8,064 0 5.0 -

6 2 sets of (100ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) in 1" conduit 16 10,208 4 2,552 12 3.0 22,969


8 Load management 1 2,000 1 2,000 0 3.0 -

Cost (∆$) 77,175 69,519 22,969

Cost (∆%) 0.35 0.32


DESCRIPTION

Final load (kW):

Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

EVSE (kW):

Stalls (20%):


City of Richmond


Energized Partial


Later Costs


136

28

12,000,000

461

226 available

461



2 50 ft of two 2" conduit 4 4,037 4 4,037 0 5.0 -



5 100 ft of 1" conduit 17 8,568 17 8,568 0 5.0 -

6 2 sets of (100ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 17 10,846 4 2,552 13 3.0 24,883


8 Load management 1 2,000 1 2,000 0 3.0 -

Cost (∆$) 76,917 68,623 24,883

Cost (∆%) 0.64 0.57


Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION

Stalls (20%):

Stalls:

Base load (kW):

EVSE (kW):

Base cost ($):


City of Richmond


Energized Partial


Later Costs


36

18

2,500,000

170

120 available

170


1 10 ft of 1" conduit 18 907 18 907 0 5.0 -

2 2 sets of (10 ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 18 1,148 9 574 9 3.0 1,723

3 Load management 18 9,000 18 9,000 0 3.0 -

Cost (∆$) 11,056 10,481 1,723

Cost (∆%) 0.44 0.42


Base load (kW):

EVSE (kW):

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION

Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Stalls (50%):


City of Richmond



108

22

25,000,000

825

180 available

825




3 800 A, 208Y/120V switchboard 1 9,440 1 9,440 0 5.0 -


5 50 ft of two 2" conduit 2 2,018 1 1,009 1 5.0 5,046



8 100 ft of 1" conduit 14 7,056 3 1,512 11 5.0 27,720

9 2 sets of (100ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 14 8,932 3 1,914 11 2.0 14,036


11 Load management 1 2,000 1 2,000 0 3.0 -

Cost (∆$) 82,049 56,361 80,644

Cost (∆%) 0.33 0.23


Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION

Stalls (20%):

Energized Partial

AC L2 Energized vs Partial, 4-way shared and managed, without conduits

Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

EVSE (kW):

Later Costs


City of Richmond


Energized Partial


Later Costs


126

26

22,000,000

835

209 available

835



2 50 ft of two 2" conduit 4 4,037 1 1,009 3 5.0 15,138



5 100 ft of 1" conduit 16 8,064 4 2,016 12 5.0 30,240

6 2 sets of (100ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) in 1" conduit 16 10,208 4 2,552 12 2.0 15,312


8 Load management 1 2,000 1 2,000 0 3.0 -

Cost (∆$) 77,175 24,094 162,216

Cost (∆%) 0.35 0.11

Cost ($ per energized stall) 612 927 1,622

DESCRIPTION

Final load (kW):

Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

EVSE (kW):

Stalls (20%):


City of Richmond


Energized Partial


Later Costs


136

28

12,000,000

461

226 available

461



2 50 ft of two 2" conduit 4 4,037 1 1,009 3 5.0 15,138



5 100 ft of 1" conduit 17 8,568 4 2,016 13 5.0 32,760

6 2 sets of (100ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 17 10,846 4 2,552 13 2.0 16,589


8 Load management 1 2,000 1 2,000 0 3.0 -

Cost (∆$) 76,917 22,694 166,012

Cost (∆%) 0.64 0.19

Cost ($ per energized stall) 566 810 1,537

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION

Stalls (20%):

Stalls:

Base load (kW):

EVSE (kW):

Base cost ($):


City of Richmond


Energized Partial


Later Costs


36

18

2,500,000

170

120 available

170


1 10 ft of 1" conduit 18 907 18 907 0 5.0 -

2 2 sets of (10 ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 18 1,148 9 574 9 3.0 1,723

3 Load management 18 9,000 18 9,000 0 3.0 -

Cost (∆$) 11,056 10,481 1,723

Cost (∆%) 0.44 0.42


Base load (kW):

EVSE (kW):

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION

Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Stalls (50%):


City of Richmond


8277 77

11

75

56

70

24

69

23

10 10

21

81

23

162

25

166

2 2

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

Four-Way Load Shared and Load Managed


80% Future/Retrofit


100% Energized


City of Richmond



108

22

25,000,000

825

389

1,214






5 1,200 A, 208Y/120V switchboard 1 11,365 1 11,365 0 5.0 -


7 200 ft of 1-1/2" conduit 9 14,990 9 14,990 0 5.0 -

8 200 ft of (3#2/0 + 1#6B) 9 27,165 9 27,165 0 3.0 -

9 40 A, 2-pole, circuit breaker in enclosure 108 19,764 108 19,764 0 3.0 -

10 10 ft of ¾" conduit 108 4,005 108 4,005 0 5.0 -

11 10 ft of (2#8 + 1#10B) 108 3,445 22 702 86 3.0 8,230


Cost (∆$) 168,836 166,093 8,230

Cost (∆%) 0.68 0.66


AC L2 Energized vs Partial, 12-way shared on 150A trunk, with conduits


Stalls

Stalls (20%):

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION


City of Richmond





126

26

22,000,000

835

93

928



2 Additional 1,600 A switchboard (with main breaker) 1 49,222 1 49,222 3 7.5 -


4 200 ft of 1-1/2" conduit 11 18,322 11 18,322 5 5.0 -

5 200 ft of (3#2/0 + 1#6B) 11 33,202 11 33,202 2 3.0 -


7 10 ft of ¾" conduit 126 4,672 126 4,672 5 5.0 -

8 10 ft of (2#8 + 1#10B) 126 4,020 26 829 2 3.0 9,570


Cost (∆$) 164,933 161,743 9,570

Cost (∆%) 0.75 0.74


DESCRIPTION

Stalls:

Stalls (20%):

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):


City of Richmond





136

28

12,000,000

461

120

581





4 200 ft of 1-1/2" conduit 12 19,987 12 19,987 0 5.0 -

5 200 ft of (3#2/0 + 1#6B) 12 36,220 12 36,220 0 3.0 -


7 10 ft of ¾" conduit 136 5,043 136 5,043 0 5.0 -

8 10 ft of (2#8 + 1#10B) 136 4,339 28 893 108 3.0 10,336


Cost (∆$) 158,768 155,323 10,336

Cost (∆%) 1.32 1.29


Final load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Stalls:

Stalls (20%):

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

DESCRIPTION


City of Richmond





36

18

2,500,000

170

120

290







6 10 ft of 1" conduit 18 907 18 907 0 5.0 -

7 2 sets of (10 ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 18 1,148 9 574 9 3.0 1,723

Cost (∆$) 26,379 25,805 1,723

Cost (∆%) 1.06 1.03


DESCRIPTION

Increase (kW):

Base load (kW):

Stalls:

Stalls (50%):

Base cost ($):

Final load (kW):


City of Richmond



108

22

25,000,000

825

389

1,214






5 1,200 A, 208Y/120V switchboard 1 11,365 1 11,365 0 5.0 -


7 200 ft of 1-1/2" conduit 9 14,990 2 3,331 7 5.0 58,296

8 200 ft of (3#2/0 + 1#6B) 9 27,165 2 6,037 7 2.0 42,257

9 40 A, 2-pole, circuit breaker in enclosure 108 19,764 22 4,026 86 3.0 47,214

10 10 ft of ¾" conduit 108 4,005 22 816 86 5.0 15,944

11 10 ft of (2#8 + 1#10B) 108 3,445 22 702 86 2.0 5,487


Cost (∆$) 168,836 99,432 214,037

Cost (∆%) 0.68 0.40


AC L2 Energized vs Partial, 12-way shared on 150A trunk, without conduits


Stalls

Stalls (20%):

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION


City of Richmond





126

26

22,000,000

835

93

928



2 Additional 1,600 A switchboard (with main breaker) 1 49,222 1 49,222 3 7.5 -


4 200 ft of 1-1/2" conduit 11 18,322 2 3,331 5 5.0 74,952

5 200 ft of (3#2/0 + 1#6B) 11 33,202 2 6,037 2 2.0 54,330


7 10 ft of ¾" conduit 126 4,672 26 964 5 5.0 18,540

8 10 ft of (2#8 + 1#10B) 126 4,020 26 829 2 2.0 6,380


Cost (∆$) 164,933 78,363 266,752

Cost (∆%) 0.75 0.36


Stalls:

Stalls (20%):

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION


City of Richmond





136

28

12,000,000

461

120

581





4 200 ft of 1-1/2" conduit 12 19,987 3 4,997 9 5.0 74,952

5 200 ft of (3#2/0 + 1#6B) 12 36,220 3 9,055 9 2.0 54,330


7 10 ft of ¾" conduit 136 5,043 28 1,038 108 5.0 20,023

8 10 ft of (2#8 + 1#10B) 136 4,339 28 893 108 2.0 6,891


Cost (∆$) 158,768 70,182 273,138

Cost (∆%) 1.32 0.58


Stalls:

Stalls (20%):

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION


City of Richmond





36

18

2,500,000

170

120

290







6 10 ft of 1" conduit 18 907 18 907 0 5.0 -

7 2 sets of (10 ft of 2#8 + 1#10B) 18 1,148 9 574 9 3.0 1,723

Cost (∆$) 26,379 25,805 1,723

Cost (∆%) 1.06 1.03


Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION

Increase (kW):

Stalls:

Stalls (50%):

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):


City of Richmond


169 165159

26

166

99

162

78

155

70

26 26

8

214

10

267

10

273

2 2

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

Twelve-Way Load Shared on 150A Trunk

Energized vs Partial (Total Cost $)

80% Future/Retrofit


100% Energized


City of Richmond



108

22

25,000,000

825

80

905


1 1,000 kVA, 25kV - 600Y/347V main transformer (no change) 1 - 1 - 0 7.5 -



4 112.5 kVA, 600V - 208Y/120V transformer 1 7,684 1 7,684 0 3.0 -

5 50 ft of two 2" conduit 1 1,009 1 1,009 0 5.0 -


7 400 A main lugs, 208Y/120V, 42 cct panelboard (lugs only) 1 2,522 1 2,522 0 3.0 -

8 80 A, 2p circuit breakers 6 1,895 6 1,895 0 3.0 -

9 200 ft of 1-1/4" conduit 6 8,323 6 8,323 0 5.0 -

10 200 ft of (2#1 + 1#6B) 6 10,523 6 10,523 0 3.0 -


12 10 ft of ¾" conduit 108 4,005 108 4,005 0 5.0 -

13 10 ft of (2#8 + 1#10B) 108 3,445 22 702 86 3.0 8,230


Cost (∆$) 83,184 80,441 8,230

Cost (∆%) 0.33 0.32


Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION


Stalls:

Base cost ($):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Stalls (20%):



City of Richmond





126

26

22,000,000

835

93

928


1 1,000 kVA, 25kV - 600Y/347V main transformer (no change) 1 - 1 - 0 7.5 -



4 50 ft of two 2" conduit 1 1,009 1 1,009 0 5.0 -


6 400 A main lugs, 208Y/120V, 42 cct panelboard (lugs only) 1 2,522 1 2,522 0 3.0 -

7 80 A, 2p circuit breakers 7 2,210 7 2,210 0 3.0 -

8 200 ft of 1-1/4" conduit 7 9,710 7 9,710 0 5.0 -

9 200 ft of (2#1 + 1#6B) 7 12,277 7 12,277 0 3.0 -


11 10 ft of ¾" conduit 126 4,672 126 4,672 0 5.0 -

12 10 ft of (2#8 + 1#10B) 126 4,020 26 829 100 3.0 9,570


Cost (∆$) 72,078 68,888 9,570

Cost (∆%) 0.33 0.31


Stalls:

Stalls (20%):

Base load (kW):

Increase (kW):

Final load (kW):

DESCRIPTION

Base cost ($):


City of Richmond


Appendix C Parkade Layouts

STAIRS

DRIVEWAY

STRATA

LOT

(62.2 m

2

)

STAIRS

MECHANICAL

ROOM

S 13

S 14

S 15

S 16

S 17

S 18

S 19

FAN

ROOM

S 46 S 47 S 48 S 49 S 50 S 51 S 52 S 53

S 45 S 44 S 43 S 42 S 41 S 40 S 39 S 38

S 20 S 21 S 22 S 23 S 24 S 25 S 26 S 27 S 28 S 29 S 30

S 32

S 33

S 34

S 35

S 36

S 12 S 11 S 10 S 9 S 8 S 7 S 6 S 5 S 4 S 3 S 2

WATER

ROOM

CABLE

RISER

GENE-

RATOR

ROOM

GARBAGE/

RECYCLE

ROOM

CORR

STAIRS

ELEV

ELEC

LOBBY

ENTRANCE

LOBBY

STRATA LOT

(103.7 m

2

)

STRATA LOT

(56.4 m

2

)

STRATA LOT

(64.2 m

2

)

STRATA

LOT

(45.6 m

2

)

STRATA

LOT

(45.8 m

2

)

STRATA

LOT

(45.8 m

2

)

DRIVEWAY

ELECTRICAL AND

COMMUNICATIONS

ROOM

EVSE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EVSE

EV

SE

STORAGE

S 31

S 1

S 54

S 37

EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE

ENTRANCE

RAMP

2 LEVELS OF PARKADE

54 PARKING STALLS PER FLOOR

108 PARKING STALLS TOTAL

GENERAL NOTES


EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE


EV

SE

seal

rev.

project no.

drawing no.checked

approved

drawn

designed scale dateconsultant project

drawing title

1330 Granville St.Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1M7

P : 604.569.6500F : 604.569.6501

Designing A Better TomorrowCALGARY | VANCOUVER | VICTORIA

W : AESengr.com

PARKING FLOOR PLANTYPICAL HIGH RISE

INFRASTRUCTURE REQUIREMENTSELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING

2-16-334

1:250 2017 JAN 16

RB

CF

CF

E100 1

STAIRS

DRIVEWAY

STRATA

LOT

(62.2 m

2

)

STAIRS

MECHANICAL

ROOM

S 13

S 14

S 15

S 16

S 17

S 18

S 19

FAN

ROOM

S 46 S 47 S 48 S 49 S 50 S 51 S 52 S 53

S 45 S 44 S 43 S 42 S 41 S 40 S 39 S 38

S 20 S 21 S 22 S 23 S 24 S 25 S 26 S 27 S 28 S 29 S 30

S 32

S 33

S 34

S 35

S 36

S 12 S 11 S 10 S 9 S 8 S 7 S 6 S 5 S 4 S 3 S 2

WATER

ROOM

CABLE

RISER

GENE-

RATOR

ROOM

GARBAGE/

RECYCLE

ROOM

CORR

STAIRS

ELEV

ELEC

LOBBY

ENTRANCE

LOBBY

STRATA LOT

(103.7 m

2

)

STRATA LOT

(56.4 m

2

)

STRATA LOT

(64.2 m

2

)

STRATA

LOT

(45.6 m

2

)

STRATA

LOT

(45.8 m

2

)

STRATA

LOT

(45.8 m

2

)

DRIVEWAY

ELECTRICAL AND

COMMUNICATIONS

ROOM

EVSE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EVSE

EV

SE

STORAGE

S 31

S 1

S 54

S 37


ENTRANCE

RAMP

2 LEVELS OF PARKADE



GENERAL NOTES


EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE


EV

SE

208Y/120V,

225A, 42 CCT

PANEL

208Y/120V,

225A, 42 CCT

PANEL

J

J

J

J J

J

J

6 S

ET

S O

F 2

#8

+

1

#1

0 B

ON

D IN

2

"C

3 SETS OF 2#8 + 1#10 BOND IN 1-1/4"C

4 SETS OF 2#8 + 1#10 BOND IN 1-1/2"C

6 S

ET

S O

F 2

#8

+

1

#1

0 B

ON

D IN

2

"C

6 S

ET

S O

F 2

#8

+

1

#1

0 B

ON

D IN

2

"C

6 SETS OF 2#8 + 1#10 BOND IN 2"C


8 SETS OF 2#10 + 1#12 BOND IN 1-1/2"C

10 SETS OF 2#10 + 1#12 BOND IN 2"C

120V, 16A (1920W) PER STALL

LEVEL 1 CHARGING - DEDICATED

208Y/120V, 225A, 42 CCT PANELS

TOTAL OF 2 PANELS REQUIRED PER FLOOR

seal

rev.

project no.

drawing no.checked

approved

drawn


drawing title


P : 604.569.6500F : 604.569.6501


W : AESengr.com

L1 CHARGING (DEDICATED)TYPICAL HIGH RISE


2-16-334

1:250 2017 JAN 16

RB

CF

CF

E101 1

STAIRS

DRIVEWAY

STRATA

LOT

(62.2 m

2

)

STAIRS

MECHANICAL

ROOM

S 13

S 14

S 15

S 16

S 17

S 18

S 19

FAN

ROOM

S 46 S 47 S 48 S 49 S 50 S 51 S 52 S 53

S 45 S 44 S 43 S 42 S 41 S 40 S 39 S 38

S 20 S 21 S 22 S 23 S 24 S 25 S 26 S 27 S 28 S 29 S 30

S 32

S 33

S 34

S 35

S 36

S 12 S 11 S 10 S 9 S 8 S 7 S 6 S 5 S 4 S 3 S 2

WATER

ROOM

CABLE

RISER

GENE-

RATOR

ROOM

GARBAGE/

RECYCLE

ROOM

CORR

STAIRS

ELEV

ELEC

LOBBY

ENTRANCE

LOBBY

STRATA LOT

(103.7 m

2

)

STRATA LOT

(56.4 m

2

)

STRATA LOT

(64.2 m

2

)

STRATA

LOT

(45.6 m

2

)

STRATA

LOT

(45.8 m

2

)

STRATA

LOT

(45.8 m

2

)

DRIVEWAY

ELECTRICAL AND

COMMUNICATIONS

ROOM

EVSE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EVSE

EV

SE

STORAGE

S 31

S 1

S 54

S 37


ENTRANCE

RAMP

2 LEVELS OF PARKADE



GENERAL NOTES


EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE


EV

SE

208Y/120V,

400A, 42 CCT

PANEL

208Y/120V,

400A, 42 CCT

PANEL

J3 SETS OF 2#8 + 1#10 BOND IN 1-1/4"C





208Y/120V,

400A, 42 CCT

PANEL

208Y/120V,

400A, 42 CCT

PANEL






3 SETS OF 2#8 + 1#10 BOND IN 1-1/4"C

J




seal

rev.

project no.

drawing no.checked

approved

drawn


drawing title


P : 604.569.6500F : 604.569.6501


W : AESengr.com

L2 CHARGING (DEDICATED)TYPICAL HIGH RISE


2-16-334

1:250 2017 JAN 16

RB

CF

CF

E102 1

STAIRS

DRIVEWAY

STRATA

LOT

(62.2 m

2

)

STAIRS

MECHANICAL

ROOM

S 13

S 14

S 15

S 16

S 17

S 18

S 19

FAN

ROOM

S 46 S 47 S 48 S 49 S 50 S 51 S 52 S 53

S 45 S 44 S 43 S 42 S 41 S 40 S 39 S 38

S 20 S 21 S 22 S 23 S 24 S 25 S 26 S 27 S 28 S 29 S 30

S 32

S 33

S 34

S 35

S 36

S 12 S 11 S 10 S 9 S 8 S 7 S 6 S 5 S 4 S 3 S 2

WATER

ROOM

CABLE

RISER

GENE-

RATOR

ROOM

GARBAGE/

RECYCLE

ROOM

CORR

STAIRS

ELEV

ELEC

LOBBY

ENTRANCE

LOBBY

STRATA LOT

(103.7 m

2

)

STRATA LOT

(56.4 m

2

)

STRATA LOT

(64.2 m

2

)

STRATA

LOT

(45.6 m

2

)

STRATA

LOT

(45.8 m

2

)

STRATA

LOT

(45.8 m

2

)

DRIVEWAY

ELECTRICAL AND

COMMUNICATIONS

ROOM

EVSE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EVSE

EV

SE

STORAGES 31

S 1

S 54

S 37


ENTRANCE

RAMP


EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE


EV

SE

208Y/120V,

400A, 42 CCT

PANEL

208Y/120V,

400A, 42 CCT

PANEL

J

J

J

1 SET OF 2#8 + 1#10B

2 SETS OF 2#8 + 1#10B

in 27mmC

2 SETS OF 2#8 + 1#10B

2 SETS OF 2#8 + 1#10B2 SETS OF 2#8 + 1#10B

1 SET OF 2#8 + 1#10B

1 SET OF 2#8 + 1#10B

2 SETS OF 2#8 + 1#10B

1 SET OF 2#8 + 1#10B

GENERAL NOTES

2 LEVELS OF PARKADE54 PARKING STALLS PER FLOOR108 PARKING STALLS TOTAL

LEVEL 2 CHARGING - 4/SHARED

32A * 208V (6,656W) PER 4 STALLS208Y / 120V, 400 A, 42cct PANELS1 PANEL PER FLOOR

seal

rev.

project no.

drawing no.checked

approved

drawn


drawing title


P : 604.569.6500F : 604.569.6501


W : AESengr.com

L2 CHARGING (LOAD SHARING)TYPICAL HIGH RISE


2-16-334

1:250 2017 JAN 16

RB

CF

CF

E103 1

STAIRS

DRIVEWAY

STRATA

LOT

(62.2 m

2

)

STAIRS

MECHANICAL

ROOM

S 13

S 14

S 15

S 16

S 17

S 18

S 19

FAN

ROOM

S 46 S 47 S 48 S 49 S 50 S 51 S 52 S 53

S 45 S 44 S 43 S 42 S 41 S 40 S 39 S 38

S 20 S 21 S 22 S 23 S 24 S 25 S 26 S 27 S 28 S 29 S 30

S 32

S 33

S 34

S 35

S 36

S 12 S 11 S 10 S 9 S 8 S 7 S 6 S 5 S 4 S 3 S 2

WATER

ROOM

CABLE

RISER

GENE-

RATOR

ROOM

GARBAGE/

RECYCLE

ROOM

CORR

STAIRS

ELEV

ELEC

LOBBY

ENTRANCE

LOBBY

STRATA LOT

(103.7 m

2

)

STRATA LOT

(56.4 m

2

)

STRATA LOT

(64.2 m

2

)

STRATA

LOT

(45.6 m

2

)

STRATA

LOT

(45.8 m

2

)

STRATA

LOT

(45.8 m

2

)

DRIVEWAY

ELECTRICAL AND

COMMUNICATIONS

ROOM

STORAGE

S 31

S 1

S 54

S 37

ENTRANCE

RAMP

2 LEVELS OF PARKADE



GENERAL NOTES

208Y/120V,

400A, 42 CCT

PANEL

208V, 64A (13,312W) PER CIRCUIT

LEVEL 2 CHARGING - TRUNK STYLE


TOTAL OF 1 PANEL REQUIRED

CBJ

EVSE

CB

EVSE

CB

EVSE

CB

EVSE

CBJ

EVSE

CB

EVSE

CB

EVSE

CB

EVSE

CBJ

EVSE

CB

EVSE

CB

EVSE

CB

EVSE

CBJ

EVSE

CB

EVSE

CB

EVSE

CB

EVSE

CBJ

EVSE

CB

EVSE

ALL BRANCH WIRING FROM JUNCTION BOXES TO

EVSE UNITS IS TO BE 2#8 + 1#10 BOND IN 3/4"C

CBJ

EVSE

CB

EVSE

CBJ

EVSE

CB

EVSE

CBJ

EVSE

CB

EVSE

CBJ

EVSE

CB

EVSE

CBJ

EVSE

CB

EVSE

CBJ

EVSE

CB

EVSE

CB

J

EVSECB

EVSE

CB

J

EVSECB

EVSE

CB JEVSE

CB

J

EVSECB

EVSE

CBJEVSE

CB

J

EVSECB

EVSE

CB

J

EVSECB

EVSE

JCB

EVSE

CB

EVSE

JCB

EVSE

CB

EVSE

JCB

EVSE

CB

EVSE

JCB

EVSE EVSE

JCB

EVSE

CB

EVSE

JCB

EVSE

CB

EVSE

CB

ALL WIRING FROM PANELS TO JUNCTION BOXES

IS TO BE 2#1 + 1#6 BOND IN 1-1/4"C

TOTAL OF 3 CIRCUITS REQUIRED PER FLOOR

J

seal

rev.

project no.

drawing no.checked

approved

drawn


drawing title


P : 604.569.6500F : 604.569.6501


W : AESengr.com

L2 CHARGING (TRUNK STYLE)TYPICAL HIGH RISE


2-16-334

1:250 2017 JAN 16

RB

CF

CF

E104 1

S 2

S 3

S 4

S 5

S 6

S 7

S 39

S 40

S 41

S 42

S 52

S 51

S 50

S 49

S 43 S 48

S 44 S 47

S 14 S 15 S 16 S 17 S 18 S 19 S 20 S 21 S 22 S 23 S 24

S 8

S 9

S 10

S 11

S 12

S 25 S 26 S 27

S 1

BIKE

STORAGE

ELECTRICAL

MECHANICAL

STORAGE

STORAGE

STAIRS

LOBBY

S 53

S 54

S 55

S 56

S 57

S 58

STAIRS

S 45 S 46 S 59

STORAGE

S 13

S 28

S 29S 30S 31S 32S 33S 34S 35S 36S 37S 38

S 60 S 61 S 62 S 63

ENTRANCE

RAMP

EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

2 LEVELS OF PARKADE



GENERAL NOTES

EV

SE

EVSE

EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE

EV

SE

DRIVEWAY

DRIVEWAY

DR

IV

EW

AY

seal

rev.

project no.

drawing no.checked

approved

drawn


drawing title


P : 604.569.6500F : 604.569.6501


W : AESengr.com

PARKING FLOOR PLANTYPICAL MID RISE - WITHIN CITY CENTRE


2-16-334

1:250 2017 JAN 16

RB

CF

CF

E110 1

S 2

S 3

S 4

S 5

S 6

S 7

S 39

S 40

S 41

S 42

S 52

S 51

S 50

S 49

S 43 S 48

S 44 S 47

S 14 S 15 S 16 S 17 S 18 S 19 S 20 S 21 S 22 S 23 S 24

S 8

S 9

S 10

S 11

S 12

S 25 S 26 S 27

S 1

BIKE

STORAGE

ELECTRICAL

MECHANICAL

STORAGE

STORAGE

STAIRS

LOBBY

S 53

S 54

S 55

S 56

S 57

S 58

STAIRS

S 45 S 46 S 59

STORAGE

S 13

S 28

S 29S 30S 31S 32S 33S 34S 35S 36S 37S 38

S 60 S 61 S 62 S 63

ENTRANCE

RAMP

EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

2 LEVELS OF PARKADE



GENERAL NOTES

EV

SE

EVSE


EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE

EV

SE

DRIVEWAY

DRIVEWAY

DR

IV

EW

AY

208Y/120V,

225A, 42 CCT

PANEL

208Y/120V,

225A, 42 CCT

PANEL

J

J

J


4 SETS OF 2#10 + 1#12 BOND IN 1"C

3 SETS OF 2#10 + 1#12 BOND IN 3/4"C

4 SETS OF 2#10 + 1#12 BOND IN 1"C

JJ

14 SETS OF 2#10 + 1#10 BOND IN 2"C

4 SETS OF 2#8 + 1#10 BOND IN 1-1/2"C

5 SETS OF 2#8 + 1#10 BOND IN 1-1/2"C6 SETS OF 2#8 + 1#10 BOND IN 2"C

1 SET OF 2#8 + 1#10 BOND IN 3/4"C

4 S

ET

S O

F 2

#8

+

1

#1

0 B

ON

D IN

1

-1

/2

"C

6 S

ET

S O

F 2

#8

+

1

#1

0 B

ON

D IN

2

"C






JJ

seal

rev.

project no.

drawing no.checked

approved

drawn


drawing title


P : 604.569.6500F : 604.569.6501


W : AESengr.com

L1 CHARGING (DEDICATED)TYPICAL MID RISE - WITHIN CITY CENTRE


2-16-334

1:250 2017 JAN 16

RB

CF

CF

E111 1

S 2

S 3

S 4

S 5

S 6

S 7

S 39

S 40

S 41

S 42

S 52

S 51

S 50

S 49

S 43 S 48

S 44 S 47

S 14 S 15 S 16 S 17 S 18 S 19 S 20 S 21 S 22 S 23 S 24

S 8

S 9

S 10

S 11

S 12

S 25 S 26 S 27

S 1

BIKE

STORAGE

ELECTRICAL

MECHANICAL

STORAGE

STORAGE

STAIRS

LOBBY

S 53

S 54

S 55

S 56

S 57

S 58

STAIRS

S 45 S 46 S 59

STORAGE

S 13

S 28

S 29S 30S 31S 32S 33S 34S 35S 36S 37S 38

S 60 S 61 S 62 S 63

ENTRANCE

RAMP

EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

2 LEVELS OF PARKADE



GENERAL NOTES

EV

SE

EVSE


EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE

EV

SE

DRIVEWAY

DRIVEWAY

DR

IV

EW

AY

208Y/120V,

400A, 42 CCT

PANEL

208Y/120V,

400A, 42 CCT

PANEL


3 SETS OF 2#8 + 1#10 BOND IN 1-1/4"C


1 SET OF 2#8 + 1#10 BOND IN 3/4"C





208Y/120V,

400A, 42 CCT

PANEL


208Y/120V,

400A, 42 CCT

PANEL

208Y/120V,

400A, 42 CCT

PANEL

2 SETS OF 2#8 + 1#10 BOND IN 1"C2 SETS OF 2#8 + 1#10 BOND IN 1"C


1 SET OF 2#8 + 1#10 BOND IN 3/4"C



1 SET OF 2#8 + 1#10 BOND IN 3/4"C

seal

rev.

project no.

drawing no.checked

approved

drawn


drawing title


P : 604.569.6500F : 604.569.6501


W : AESengr.com

L2 CHARGING (DEDICATED)TYPICAL MID RISE - WITHIN CITY CENTRE


2-16-334

1:250 2017 JAN 16

RB

CF

CF

E112 1

S 2

S 3

S 4

S 5

S 6

S 7

S 39

S 40

S 41

S 42

S 52

S 51

S 50

S 49

S 43 S 48

S 44 S 47

S 14 S 15 S 16 S 17 S 18 S 19 S 20 S 21 S 22 S 23 S 24

S 8

S 9

S 10

S 11

S 12

S 25 S 26 S 27

S 1

BIKE

STORAGE

ELECTRICAL

MECHANICAL

STORAGE

STORAGE

STAIRS

LOBBY

S 53

S 54

S 55

S 56

S 57

S 58

STAIRS

S 45 S 46 S 59

STORAGE

S 13

S 28

S 29S 30S 31S 32S 33S 34S 35S 36S 37S 38

S 60 S 61 S 62 S 63

ENTRANCE

RAMP

EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

2 LEVELS OF PARKADE



GENERAL NOTES

EV

SE

EVSE


EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE

EV

SE

DRIVEWAY

DRIVEWAY

DR

IV

EW

AY

208Y/120V,

400A, 42 CCT

PANEL

208Y/120V,

400A, 42 CCT

PANEL

J

J

J


1 SET OF 2#8 + 1#10 BOND IN 3/4"C

1 SET OF 2#8 + 1#10 BOND IN 3/4"C

1 SET OF 2#8 + 1#10 BOND IN 3/4"C

J


1 SET OF 2#8 + 1#10 BOND IN 3/4"C


1 SET OF 2#8 + 1#10 BOND IN 3/4"C

1 SET OF 2#8 + 1#10 BOND IN 3/4"C

1 S

ET

O

F 2

#8

+

1

#1

0 B

ON

D IN

3

/4

"C

1 S

ET

O

F 2

#8

+

1

#1

0 B

ON

D IN

3

/4

"C


208V, 32A (6656W) PER 4 STALLS (APPROXIMATE)

LEVEL 2 CHARGING - LOAD SHARING




seal

rev.

project no.

drawing no.checked

approved

drawn


drawing title


P : 604.569.6500F : 604.569.6501


W : AESengr.com

L2 CHARGING (LOAD SHARING)TYPICAL MID RISE - WITHIN CITY CENTRE


2-16-334

1:250 2017 JAN 16

RB

CF

CF

E113 1

S 2

S 3

S 4

S 5

S 6

S 7

S 39

S 40

S 41

S 42

S 52

S 51

S 50

S 49

S 43 S 48

S 44 S 47

S 14 S 15 S 16 S 17 S 18 S 19 S 20 S 21 S 22 S 23 S 24

S 8

S 9

S 10

S 11

S 12

S 25 S 26 S 27

S 1

BIKE

STORAGE

ELECTRICAL

MECHANICAL

STORAGE

STORAGE

STAIRS

LOBBY

S 53

S 54

S 55

S 56

S 57

S 58

STAIRS

S 45 S 46 S 59

STORAGE

S 13

S 28

S 29S 30S 31S 32S 33S 34S 35S 36S 37S 38

S 60 S 61 S 62 S 63

ENTRANCE

RAMP

DRIVEWAY

DRIVEWAY

DR

IV

EW

AY

2 LEVELS OF PARKADE



GENERAL NOTES




TOTAL OF 1 PANEL REQUIRED




IS TO BE 2#1 + 1#6 BOND IN 1-1/4"C

TOTAL OF 7 CIRCUITS REQUIRED

208Y/120V,

400A, 42 CCT

PANEL

JCB

EVSE

CB

EVSE

JCB

EVSE

CB

EVSE

JCB

EVSE

CB

EVSE

JCB

EVSE

CB

EVSE

JCB

EVSE

CB

EVSE

JCB

EVSE

CB

J

EVSECB

EVSE

CB

J

EVSECB

EVSE

CB

J

EVSECB

EVSE

JEVSE

CB

CB

J

EVSECB

EVSE

CB

J

EVSECB

EVSE

CB

J

EVSECB

EVSE

CB

J

EVSECB

EVSE

CB

EVSECB

EVSE

CB

J

EVSECB

EVSECB

EVSECB

EVSE

CB

J

EVSECB

EVSECB

EVSECB

EVSE

J

EVSECB

EVSECB

CB

J

EVSECB

EVSE

CB

J

EVSECB

EVSE

CB

J

EVSECB

EVSE

CBJ

EVSE

CB

EVSE

CBJ

EVSE

CB

EVSE

CBJ

EVSE

CB

EVSE

CBJ

EVSE

CB

EVSE

CBJ

EVSE

CB

EVSE

CBJ

EVSE

CB

EVSE

CBJ

EVSE

CB

EVSE

CBJ

EVSE

JCB

EVSE

CB

EVSE

JCB

EVSE

CB

EVSE

J TO 2ND FLOOR

OF PARKADE

TO 2ND FLOOR

OF PARKADE

seal

rev.

project no.

drawing no.checked

approved

drawn


drawing title


P : 604.569.6500F : 604.569.6501


W : AESengr.com

L2 CHARGING (TRUNK STYLE)TYPICAL MID RISE - WITHIN CITY CENTRE


2-16-334

1:250 2017 JAN 16

RB

CF

CF

E114 1

ELECTRICAL

ROOM

DRIVEWAY

STAIRS

MECHANICAL

ROOM

S 1

S 2

S 3

STAIRS

S 18 S 19 S 20 S 21 S 22 S 23 S 24 S 25 S 26 S 27 S 28 S 29 S 30 STAIRS

S 43

S 45

S 46

S 47

S 48

S 49

S 63 S 62 S 61 S 60 S 59 S 58 S 57 S 56 S 55 S 54 S 53 S 52

ENTRANCE

RAMP

S 51 S 50

STORAGE

S 93

S 94

S 95

S 96

S 97

S 98

S 99

S 100

S 101

S 112

S 111

S 110

S 109

S 108

S 107

S 106

S 105

S 104

S 113

S 114

S 115

S 116

S 117

S 118

S 120

S 121

S 122

S 123

S 136

S 135

S 134

S 133

S 132

S 131

S 129

S 128

S 127

S 126

S 42

S 41

S 40

S 39

S 4

S 5

S 6

S 7

S 9

S 10

S 17

S 11

S 12

S 13

DRIVEWAY

DR

IV

EW

AY

DR

IV

EW

AY

DR

IV

EW

AY

S 69

S 70

S 71

S 72

S 73

S 74

S 76

S 77

S 78

S 79

S 92

S 91

S 90

S 89

S 88

S 87

S 85

S 84

S 83

S 82

DR

IV

EW

AY

S 31 S 32 S 33 S 34 S 35 S 36 S 37

S 64S 65S 66S 67S 68

DRIVEWAY

DRIVEWAY

S 38

S 14

S 15

S 16

S 80 S 81 S 102 S 103 S 124 S 125

S 75 S 86 S 119 S 130

CORRIDOR

STAIRS

S 8

S 44

STORAGE

EVSE

EV

SE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EV

SE

EVSE

1 LEVEL OF PARKADE


GENERAL NOTES

EVSEEVSEEVSEEVSEEVSEEVSEEVSEEVSEEVSE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE

STORAGE

seal

rev.

project no.

drawing no.checked

approved

drawn


drawing title


P : 604.569.6500F : 604.569.6501


W : AESengr.com

PARKING FLOOR PLANTYPICAL MID RISE - OUTSIDE CITY CENTRE


2-16-334

1:250 2017 JAN 16

RB

CF

CF

E120 1

ELECTRICAL

ROOM

DRIVEWAY

STAIRS

MECHANICAL

ROOM

S 1

S 2

S 3

STAIRS


S 43

S 45

S 46

S 47

S 48

S 49

S 63 S 62 S 61 S 60 S 59 S 58 S 57 S 56 S 55 S 54 S 53 S 52

ENTRANCE

RAMP

S 51 S 50

STORAGE

S 93

S 94

S 95

S 96

S 97

S 98

S 99

S 100

S 101

S 112

S 111

S 110

S 109

S 108

S 107

S 106

S 105

S 104

S 113

S 114

S 115

S 116

S 117

S 118

S 120

S 121

S 122

S 123

S 136

S 135

S 134

S 133

S 132

S 131

S 129

S 128

S 127

S 126

S 42

S 41

S 40

S 39

S 4

S 5

S 6

S 7

S 9

S 10

S 17

S 11

S 12

S 13

DRIVEWAY

DR

IV

EW

AY

DR

IV

EW

AY

DR

IV

EW

AY

S 69

S 70

S 71

S 72

S 73

S 74

S 76

S 77

S 78

S 79

S 92

S 91

S 90

S 89

S 88

S 87

S 85

S 84

S 83

S 82

DR

IV

EW

AY

S 31 S 32 S 33 S 34 S 35 S 36 S 37

S 64S 65S 66S 67S 68

DRIVEWAY

DRIVEWAY

S 38

S 14

S 15

S 16

S 80 S 81 S 102 S 103 S 124 S 125

S 75 S 86 S 119 S 130

CORRIDOR

STAIRS

S 8

S 44

STORAGE

EVSE

EV

SE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EV

SE

EVSE

1 LEVEL OF PARKADE


GENERAL NOTES


EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE


EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE

STORAGE

208Y/120V,

225A, 42 CCT

PANEL

208Y/120V,

225A, 42 CCT

PANEL

208Y/120V,

225A, 42 CCT

PANEL

208Y/120V,

225A, 42 CCT

PANEL

J


12 SETS OF 2#10 + 1#12 BOND IN 2"C

J


J


12 SETS OF 2#10 + 1#12 BOND IN 2"C

J


J J


5 SETS OF 2#8 + 1#10 BOND IN 1-1/2"C

J

12 SETS OF 2#10 + 1#12 BOND IN 2"C

J

10 SETS OF 2#8 + 1#10 BOND IN 2-1/4"C



10 SETS OF 2#8 + 1#10 BOND IN 2-1/4"C

J J

4 SETS OF 2#8 + 1#10 BOND IN 1-1/2"C

5 SETS OF 2#8 + 1#10 BOND IN 1-1/2"C

12 SETS OF 2#10 + 1#12 BOND IN 2"C

J6 SETS OF 2#8 + 1#10 BOND IN 2"C




TOTAL OF 4 PANELS REQUIRED

seal

rev.

project no.

drawing no.checked

approved

drawn


drawing title


P : 604.569.6500F : 604.569.6501


W : AESengr.com

L1 CHARGING (DEDICATED)TYPICAL MID RISE - OUTSIDE CITY CENTRE


2-16-334

1:250 2017 JAN 16

RB

CF

CF

E121 1

ELECTRICAL

ROOM

DRIVEWAY

STAIRS

MECHANICAL

ROOM

S 1

S 2

S 3

STAIRS


S 43

S 45

S 46

S 47

S 48

S 49

S 63 S 62 S 61 S 60 S 59 S 58 S 57 S 56 S 55 S 54 S 53 S 52

ENTRANCE

RAMP

S 51 S 50

STORAGE

S 93

S 94

S 95

S 96

S 97

S 98

S 99

S 100

S 101

S 112

S 111

S 110

S 109

S 108

S 107

S 106

S 105

S 104

S 113

S 114

S 115

S 116

S 117

S 118

S 120

S 121

S 122

S 123

S 136

S 135

S 134

S 133

S 132

S 131

S 129

S 128

S 127

S 126

S 42

S 41

S 40

S 39

S 4

S 5

S 6

S 7

S 9

S 10

S 17

S 11

S 12

S 13

DR

IV

EW

AY

DR

IV

EW

AY

DR

IV

EW

AY

S 69

S 70

S 71

S 72

S 73

S 74

S 76

S 77

S 78

S 79

S 92

S 91

S 90

S 89

S 88

S 87

S 85

S 84

S 83

S 82

DR

IV

EW

AY

S 31 S 32 S 33 S 34 S 35 S 36 S 37

S 64S 65S 66S 67S 68

DRIVEWAY

DRIVEWAY

S 38

S 14

S 15

S 16

S 80 S 81 S 102 S 103 S 124 S 125

S 75 S 86 S 119 S 130

CORRIDOR

STAIRS

S 8

S 44

STORAGE

EVSE

EV

SE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EV

SE

EVSE

1 LEVEL OF PARKADE


GENERAL NOTES


EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE


EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE

STORAGE

208Y/120V,

400A, 42 CCT

PANEL

208Y/120V,

400A, 42 CCT

PANEL

208Y/120V,

400A, 42 CCT

PANEL





208Y/120V,

400A, 42 CCT

PANEL

208Y/120V,

400A, 42 CCT

PANEL

208Y/120V,

400A, 42 CCT

PANEL






1 SET OF 2#8 + 1#10 BOND IN 3/4"C

208Y/120V,

400A, 42 CCT

PANEL


1 SET OF 2#8 + 1#10 BOND IN 3/4"C

208Y/120V,

400A, 42 CCT

PANEL




208Y/120V,

400A, 42 CCT

PANEL



1 SET OF 2#8 + 1#10 BOND IN 3/4"C



seal

rev.

project no.

drawing no.checked

approved

drawn


drawing title


P : 604.569.6500F : 604.569.6501


W : AESengr.com

L2 CHARGING (DEDICATED)TYPICAL MID RISE - OUTSIDE CITY CENTRE


2-16-334

1:250 2017 JAN 16

RB

CF

CF

E122 1

ELECTRICAL

ROOM

DRIVEWAY

STAIRS

MECHANICAL

ROOM

S 1

S 2

S 3

STAIRS


S 43

S 45

S 46

S 47

S 48

S 49

S 63 S 62 S 61 S 60 S 59 S 58 S 57 S 56 S 55 S 54 S 53 S 52

ENTRANCE

RAMP

S 51 S 50

STORAGE

S 93

S 94

S 95

S 96

S 97

S 98

S 99

S 100

S 101

S 112

S 111

S 110

S 109

S 108

S 107

S 106

S 105

S 104

S 113

S 114

S 115

S 116

S 117

S 118

S 120

S 121

S 122

S 123

S 136

S 135

S 134

S 133

S 132

S 131

S 129

S 128

S 127

S 126

S 42

S 41

S 40

S 39

S 4

S 5

S 6

S 7

S 9

S 10

S 17

S 11

S 12

S 13

DRIVEWAY

DR

IV

EW

AY

DR

IV

EW

AY

DR

IV

EW

AY

S 69

S 70

S 71

S 72

S 73

S 74

S 76

S 77

S 78

S 79

S 92

S 91

S 90

S 89

S 88

S 87

S 85

S 84

S 83

S 82

DR

IV

EW

AY

S 31 S 32 S 33 S 34 S 35 S 36 S 37

S 64S 65S 66S 67S 68

DRIVEWAY

DRIVEWAY

S 38

S 14

S 15

S 16

S 80 S 81 S 102 S 103 S 124 S 125

S 75 S 86 S 119 S 130

CORRIDOR

STAIRS

S 8

S 44

STORAGE

EVSE

EV

SE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EVSE

EV

SE

EVSE

1 LEVEL OF PARKADE


GENERAL NOTES


EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE


EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE

EV

SE

STORAGE

208Y/120V,

400A, 42 CCT

PANEL

208Y/120V,

400A, 42 CCT

PANEL

208Y/120V,

400A, 42 CCT

PANEL

208Y/120V,

400A, 42 CCT

PANEL

J


3 SETS OF 2#8 + 1#10 BOND IN 1-1/4"C

J


J


3 SETS OF 2#8 + 1#10 BOND IN 1-1/4"C

1 SET OF 2#8 + 1#10 BOND IN 3/4"C

J


J

3 SETS OF 2#8 + 1#10 BOND IN 1-1/4"C

J

3 SETS OF 2#8 + 1#10 BOND IN 1-1/4"C



3 SETS OF 2#8 + 1#10 BOND IN 1-1/4"C

J


3 SETS OF 2#8 + 1#10 BOND IN 1-1/4"C

1 SET OF 2#8 + 1#10 BOND IN 3/4"C

208V, 32A (6656W) PER 4 STALLS (APPROXIMATE)

LEVEL 2 CHARGING - LOAD SHARING



1 SET OF 2#8 + 1#10 BOND IN 3/4"C

1 SET OF 2#8 + 1#10 BOND IN 3/4"C

seal

rev.

project no.

drawing no.checked

approved

drawn


drawing title


P : 604.569.6500F : 604.569.6501


W : AESengr.com

L2 CHARGING (LOAD SHARING)TYPICAL MID RISE - OUTSIDE CITY CENTRE


2-16-334

1:250 2017 JAN 16

RB

CF

CF

E123 1

ELECTRICAL

ROOM

DRIVEWAY

STAIRS

MECHANICAL

ROOM

S 1

S 2

S 3

STAIRS

S 18 S 19 S 20 S 21 S 22 S 23 S 24 S 25 S 26 S 27 S 28 S 29 S 30

STAIRS

S 43

S 45

S 46

S 47

S 48

S 49

S 63 S 62 S 61 S 60 S 59 S 58 S 57 S 56 S 55 S 54 S 53 S 52

ENTRANCE

RAMP

S 51 S 50

STORAGE

S 93

S 94

S 95

S 96

S 97

S 98

S 99

S 100

S 101

S 112

S 111

S 110

S 109

S 108

S 107

S 106

S 105

S 104

S 113

S 114

S 115

S 116

S 117

S 118

S 120

S 121

S 122

S 123

S 136

S 135

S 134

S 133

S 132

S 131

S 129

S 128

S 127

S 126

S 42

S 41

S 40

S 39

S 4

S 5

S 6

S 7

S 9

S 10

S 17

S 11

S 12

S 13

DRIVEWAY

DR

IV

EW

AY

DR

IV

EW

AY

DR

IV

EW

AY

S 69

S 70

S 71

S 72

S 73

S 74

S 76

S 77

S 78

S 79

S 92

S 91

S 90

S 89

S 88

S 87

S 85

S 84

S 83

S 82

DR

IV

EW

AY

S 31 S 32 S 33 S 34 S 35 S 36 S 37

S 64S 65S 66S 67S 68

DRIVEWAY

DRIVEWAY

S 38

S 14

S 15

S 16

S 80 S 81 S 102 S 103 S 124 S 125

S 75 S 86 S 119 S 130

CORRIDOR

STAIRS

S 8

S 44

STORAGE

STORAGE

1 LEVEL OF PARKADE


GENERAL NOTES








IS TO BE 2#1 + 1#6 BOND IN 1-1/4"C

TOTAL OF 9 CIRCUITS REQUIRED

CB

J

EVSECB

EVSE

CB

J

EVSECB

EVSE

CB

J

EVSECB

EVSE

CB

J

EVSECB

EVSE

CB

J

EVSECB

EVSE

CB

J

EVSECB

EVSE

CB

J

EVSECB

EVSE

CB

J

EVSECB

EVSE

JCB

EVSE

CB

EVSE

JCB

EVSE

CB

EVSE

JCB

EVSE

CB

EVSE

JCB

EVSE

CB

EVSE

JCB

EVSE

CB

EVSE

JCB

EVSE

CB

EVSE

JCB

EVSE

CB

EVSE

JCB

EVSE

CB

EVSE

JCB

EVSE

CB

EVSE

JCB

EVSE

CB

J

EVSECB

EVSECB

EVSECB

EVSE

CB

J

EVSECB

EVSECB

EVSECB

EVSE

CB

J

EVSECB

EVSECB

EVSECB

EVSE

CB

J

EVSECB

EVSECB

EVSECB

EVSE

CB

J

EVSECB

EVSECB

EVSECB

EVSE

CB

JEVSE

CB

EVSECB

EVSECB

EVSEJ

CB

J

EVSECB

EVSECB

EVSECB

EVSE

CB

J

EVSECB

EVSECB

EVSECB

EVSE

CB

J

EVSECB

EVSECB

EVSECB

EVSE

CB

J

EVSECB

EVSECB

EVSECB

EVSE

CB JEVSE

CBEVSE

CB JEVSE

CBEVSE

CB

J

EVSECB

EVSECB

EVSECB

EVSE

CB J

EVSECB

EVSECB

EVSECB

EVSE

CB

J

EVSECB

EVSECB

EVSECB

EVSE

CB

J

EVSECB

EVSECB

EVSECB

EVSE

CB

J

EVSECB

EVSECB

EVSECB

EVSE

CB

J

EVSECB

EVSECB

EVSECB

EVSE

J

CBJ

EVSE

CB

EVSE

CBJ

EVSE

CB

EVSE

CBJ

EVSE

CB

EVSE

CBJ

EVSE

CB

EVSE

CBJ

EVSE

CB

EVSE

CBJ

EVSE

CB

EVSE

CBJ

EVSE

CB

EVSE

CBJ

EVSE

CB

EVSE

CBJ

EVSE

CB

EVSE

CBJ

EVSE

CB

EVSE

CBJ

EVSE

CB

J

EVSECB

EVSE

CB

J

EVSECB

EVSE

CB

J

EVSECB

EVSE

CB

J

EVSECB

EVSE

CB

J

EVSECB

EVSE

CB

J

EVSECB

EVSE

208Y/120V,

400A, 42 CCT

PANEL

208Y/120V,

400A, 42 CCT

PANEL

J

seal

rev.

project no.

drawing no.checked

approved

drawn


drawing title


P : 604.569.6500F : 604.569.6501


W : AESengr.com

L2 CHARGING (TRUNK STYLE)TYPICAL MID RISE - OUTSIDE CITY CENTRE


2-16-334

1:250 2017 JAN 16

RB

CF

CF

E124 1

16 SUITES

2 PARKING SPOTS PER SUITE


GENERAL NOTES

ST

AIR

SW

AS

HR

OO

M

BEDROOM

ST

AIR

SW

AS

HR

OO

M

BEDROOM

EN

TR

AN

CE

ST

AL

L #

2

SUITE A SUITE B

EN

TR

AN

CE

EN

TR

AN

CE

ST

AIR

S

ST

AIR

S

WA

SH

RO

OM

BEDROOM

WA

SH

RO

OM

BEDROOM

SUITE I SUITE J

ST

AL

L #

1

CL

OS

ET

ST

AL

L #

2

ST

AL

L #

1

EN

TR

AN

CE

CL

OS

ET

ST

AIR

SW

AS

HR

OO

M

BEDROOM

ST

AIR

SW

AS

HR

OO

M

BEDROOM

EN

TR

AN

CE

SUITE C SUITE D

CL

OS

ET

EN

TR

AN

CE

CL

OS

ET

ST

AIR

SW

AS

HR

OO

M

BEDROOM

ST

AIR

SW

AS

HR

OO

M

BEDROOM

EN

TR

AN

CE

SUITE E SUITE F

CL

OS

ET

EN

TR

AN

CE

CL

OS

ET

ST

AIR

SW

AS

HR

OO

M

BEDROOM

ST

AIR

SW

AS

HR

OO

M

BEDROOM

EN

TR

AN

CE

SUITE G SUITE H

CL

OS

ET

EN

TR

AN

CE

CL

OS

ET

ST

AL

L #

2

ST

AL

L #

1

CL

OS

ET

ST

AL

L #

2

ST

AL

L #

1

CL

OS

ET

EN

TR

AN

CE

EN

TR

AN

CE

ST

AIR

S

ST

AIR

S

WA

SH

RO

OM

BEDROOM

WA

SH

RO

OM

BEDROOM

SUITE K SUITE L

ST

AL

L #

2

ST

AL

L #

1

CL

OS

ET

ST

AL

L #

2

ST

AL

L #

1

CL

OS

ET

EN

TR

AN

CE

EN

TR

AN

CE

ST

AIR

S

ST

AIR

S

WA

SH

RO

OM

BEDROOM

WA

SH

RO

OM

BEDROOM

SUITE M SUITE N

ST

AL

L #

2

ST

AL

L #

1

CL

OS

ET

ST

AL

L #

2

ST

AL

L #

1

CL

OS

ET

EN

TR

AN

CE

EN

TR

AN

CE

ST

AIR

S

ST

AIR

S

WA

SH

RO

OM

BEDROOM

WA

SH

RO

OM

BEDROOM

SUITE O SUITE P

ST

AL

L #

2

ST

AL

L #

1

CL

OS

ET

ST

AL

L #

2

ST

AL

L #

1

CL

OS

ET

EVSE EVSE

ST

AL

L #

2

ST

AL

L #

1

ST

AL

L #

2

ST

AL

L #

1

EVSE EVSE

ST

AL

L #

2

ST

AL

L #

1

ST

AL

L #

2

ST

AL

L #

1

EVSE EVSE

ST

AL

L #

2

ST

AL

L #

1

ST

AL

L #

2

ST

AL

L #

1

EVSE EVSE

EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE

LANEWAY LANEWAY LANEWAY LANEWAY

EVSE FED FROM TENANT PANELBOARDS

seal

rev.

project no.

drawing no.checked

approved

drawn


drawing title


P : 604.569.6500F : 604.569.6501


W : AESengr.com

GROUND FLOOR PLANTYPICAL TOWNHOUSES


2-16-334

1:250 2017 JAN 03

RB

CF

CF

E130 1


City of Richmond


APPENDIX D Appendix D Single Line Diagrams

BC HYDRO24.94 KV SERVICE

1000 kVA25 kV - 600Y/347V

25 kV MAINCIRCUIT

BREAKER

800A, 600Y/347V

MAIN ELECTRICAL ROOM

L.B.S.

x Ax A

RESIDENTIALUNIT LOADS

(METER CENTRES)

BCH

COMMON AREALOADS

800 A, SECONDARYCIRCUIT BREAKER

HIGH RISE - CITY CENTREBASE DESIGN

E000ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING

INFRASTRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS

consultant designed scale date

drawn

checked

approved

project

drawing title

rev.

project no.

drawing no.

RB

2-16-334

CF

CF

RB

N/A 2017 JAN 16


P : 604.569.6500F : 604.569.6501


W : AESengr.com

1

225A, 208Y/120V42 CCT PANELBOARD


1500 kVA25 kV - 600Y/347V

25 kV MAINCIRCUIT

BREAKER

1200A, 600Y/347V

x Ax A


L.B.S.

225 A

225 kVA600V - 208Y/120V

800A, 208Y/120V

200A 200A 200A

BCH BCH


(METER CENTRES)

COMMON AREALOADS


200A

20A, 120VBRANCH CIRCUITS

(108 TOTAL)

HIGH RISE - CITY CENTRE100% L1




drawn

checked

approved

project

drawing title

rev.

project no.

drawing no.

RB

2-16-334

CF

CF

RB

N/A 2017 JAN 16


P : 604.569.6500F : 604.569.6501


W : AESengr.com

1


2000 kVA25 kV - 600Y/347V

25 kV MAINCIRCUIT

BREAKER

L.B.S.

1600A, 600Y/347V

x Ax A 800 AF/ 690 AT

750 kVA600V - 208Y/120V

BCH BCH



(METER CENTRES)

COMMON AREALOADS



2000A, 208Y/120V

400A 400A 400A 400A


(108 TOTAL)

400A 400A 400A 400A

HIGH RISE - CITY CENTRE100% L2




drawn

checked

approved

project

drawing title

rev.

project no.

drawing no.

RB

2-16-334

CF

CF

RB

N/A 2017 JAN 16


P : 604.569.6500F : 604.569.6501


W : AESengr.com

1



1500 kVA25 kV - 600Y/347V

25 kV MAINCIRCUIT

BREAKER

1200A, 600Y/347V

x Ax A


L.B.S.

225 A

225 kVA600V - 208Y/120V

800A, 208Y/120V

400A 400A

BCH BCH


(METER CENTRES)

COMMON AREALOADS


4 STALLS PER40A, 208V BRANCH CIRCUIT

(108 STALLS TOTAL)

HIGH RISE - CITY CENTRE100% L2, 4-SHARED




drawn

checked

approved

project

drawing title

rev.

project no.

drawing no.

RB

2-16-334

CF

CF

RB

N/A 2017 JAN 16


P : 604.569.6500F : 604.569.6501


W : AESengr.com

1


1000 kVA25 kV - 600Y/347V

25 kV MAINCIRCUIT

BREAKER

L.B.S.

1200A, 600Y/347V

x Ax A 125 A

112.5 kVA600V - 208Y/120V

BCH BCH



(METER CENTRES)

COMMON AREALOADS


400A, 208Y/120V, PANELBOARD

40A, 208V OUTLET18 STALLS PER TRUNK

(108 STALLS TOTAL)

80 A, 2p, TRUNK CIRCUIT

80 A2p

80 A2p

80 A2p

80 A2p

80 A2p

80 A2p

40 A2p

40 A2p...

(18 TOTAL)

HIGH RISE - CITY CENTRE100% L2, TRUNK STYLE




drawn

checked

approved

project

drawing title

rev.

project no.

drawing no.

RB

2-16-334

CF

CF

RB

N/A 2017 JAN 16


P : 604.569.6500F : 604.569.6501


W : AESengr.com

1


1000 kVA25 kV - 208Y/120V

25 kV MAINCIRCUIT

BREAKER

3000A, 208Y/120V


L.B.S.

x Ax A

BCH


(METER CENTRES)

COMMON AREALOADS


MID RISE - CITY CENTREBASE DESIGN




drawn

checked

approved

project

drawing title

rev.

project no.

drawing no.

RB

2-16-334

CF

CF

RB

N/A 2017 JAN 16


P : 604.569.6500F : 604.569.6501


W : AESengr.com

1


1500 kVA25 kV - 208Y/120V

25 kV MAINCIRCUIT

BREAKER

L.B.S.

x Ax A

BCH



(METER CENTRES)

COMMON AREALOADS


3000A, 208Y/120V

BCH

200 A

225A, 208Y/120V42 POLE PANELBOARDS

200 A 200 A 200 A


(126 TOTAL)

MID RISE - CITY CENTRE100% L1




drawn

checked

approved

project

drawing title

rev.

project no.

drawing no.

RB

2-16-334

CF

CF

RB

N/A 2017 JAN 16


P : 604.569.6500F : 604.569.6501


W : AESengr.com

1


2000 kVA25 kV - 208Y/120V

25 kV MAINCIRCUIT

BREAKER

L.B.S.

x Ax A

BCH




(METER CENTRES)

COMMON AREALOADS


3000A, 208Y/120V

400 A

3000A, 208Y/120V


(126 TOTAL)


BCH

...(10 TOTAL) 400 A

MID RISE - CITY CENTRE100% L2




drawn

checked

approved

project

drawing title

rev.

project no.

drawing no.

RB

2-16-334

CF

CF

RB

N/A 2017 JAN 16


P : 604.569.6500F : 604.569.6501


W : AESengr.com

1


1500 kVA25 kV - 208Y/120V

25 kV MAINCIRCUIT

BREAKER

L.B.S.

x Ax A

BCH



(METER CENTRES)

COMMON AREALOADS


3000A, 208Y/120V

BCH

400 A


400 A 400 A 400 A


(126 STALLS TOTAL)

MID RISE - CITY CENTRE100% L2, 4-SHARED




drawn

checked

approved

project

drawing title

rev.

project no.

drawing no.

RB

2-16-334

CF

CF

RB

N/A 2017 JAN 16


P : 604.569.6500F : 604.569.6501


W : AESengr.com

1


1000 kVA25 kV - 208Y/120V

25 kV MAINCIRCUIT

BREAKER

L.B.S.

x Ax A

BCH



(METER CENTRES)

COMMON AREALOADS


3000A, 208Y/120V

400 A

BCH



(126 STALLS TOTAL)


80 A2p

80 A2p

80 A2p

80 A2p

80 A2p

80 A2p

40 A2p

40 A2p...

(18 TOTAL)

80 A2p

MID RISE - CITY CENTRE100% L2, TRUNK STYLE




drawn

checked

approved

project

drawing title

rev.

project no.

drawing no.

RB

2-16-334

CF

CF

RB

N/A 2017 JAN 16


P : 604.569.6500F : 604.569.6501


W : AESengr.com

1


500 kVA25 kV - 208Y/120V

25 kV MAINCIRCUIT

BREAKER

1600A, 208Y/120V


L.B.S.

x Ax A

BCH


(METER CENTRES)

COMMON AREALOADS


MID RISE - OUTSIDE CITY CENTREBASE DESIGN




drawn

checked

approved

project

drawing title

rev.

project no.

drawing no.

RB

2-16-334

CF

CF

RB

N/A 2017 JAN 16


P : 604.569.6500F : 604.569.6501


W : AESengr.com

1

200 A 200 A 200 A 200 A


750 kVA25 kV - 208Y/120V

25 kV MAINCIRCUIT

BREAKER

L.B.S.

x Ax A

BCH


2000A, 208Y/120V


BCH


(136 TOTAL)


(METER CENTRES)

COMMON AREALOADS


MID RISE - OUTSIDE CITY CENTRE100% L1




drawn

checked

approved

project

drawing title

rev.

project no.

drawing no.

RB

2-16-334

CF

CF

RB

N/A 2017 JAN 16


P : 604.569.6500F : 604.569.6501


W : AESengr.com

1


1500 kVA25 kV - 208Y/120V

25 kV MAINCIRCUIT

BREAKER

L.B.S.



400 A

3000A, 208Y/120V


(136 TOTAL)


BCH

...(10 TOTAL) 400 A


x Ax A

BCH


(METER CENTRES)

COMMON AREALOADS

1600A, 208Y/120V

MID RISE - OUTSIDE CITY CENTRE100% L2




drawn

checked

approved

project

drawing title

rev.

project no.

drawing no.

RB

2-16-334

CF

CF

RB

N/A 2017 JAN 16


P : 604.569.6500F : 604.569.6501


W : AESengr.com

1

400 A 400 A 400 A 400 A


750 kVA25 kV - 208Y/120V

25 kV MAINCIRCUIT

BREAKER

L.B.S.

x Ax A

BCH


2000A, 208Y/120V


BCH


(METER CENTRES)

COMMON AREALOADS



(136 STALLS TOTAL)

MID RISE - OUTSIDE CITY CENTRE100% L2, 4-SHARED




drawn

checked

approved

project

drawing title

rev.

project no.

drawing no.

RB

2-16-334

CF

CF

RB

N/A 2017 JAN 16


P : 604.569.6500F : 604.569.6501


W : AESengr.com

1


750 kVA25 kV - 208Y/120V

25 kV MAINCIRCUIT

BREAKER

L.B.S.



x Ax A

BCH


(METER CENTRES)

COMMON AREALOADS

2000A, 208Y/120V

400 A



(136 STALLS TOTAL)


80 A2p

80 A2p

80 A2p

80 A2p

80 A2p

80 A2p

40 A2p

40 A2p...

(18 TOTAL)

BCH

400 A

400A, 208Y/120V42 CCT PANELBOARDWITH 80 A, 2p, CIRCUIT BREAKERS

MID RISE - OUTSIDE CITY CENTRE100% L2, TRUNK STYLE




drawn

checked

approved

project

drawing title

rev.

project no.

drawing no.

RB

2-16-334

CF

CF

RB

N/A 2017 JAN 16


P : 604.569.6500F : 604.569.6501


W : AESengr.com

1


800A MAINCIRCUIT

BREAKER

200A100 A

225 kVA25 kV - 208Y/120V

BC HYDROPADMOUNT

800A, 208Y/120VMETER CENTERS

COMMONAREA

LOADS

100 A...

BCH

18 RESIDENTIAL UNITS

BCH


100A, 120/208V, 2P, 3WPANELBOARDS

(WITHIN RES UNIT)

BCH

TOWNHOUSEBASE DESIGN




drawn

checked

approved

project

drawing title

rev.

project no.

drawing no.

RB

2-16-334

CF

CF

RB

N/A 2017 JAN 16


P : 604.569.6500F : 604.569.6501


W : AESengr.com

1


800A MAINCIRCUIT

BREAKER

200A100 A

300 kVA25 kV - 208Y/120V

BC HYDROPADMOUNT

COMMONAREA

LOADS

100 A

BCH BCH BCH


(2 PER UNIT, 36 TOTAL)




(WITHIN RES UNIT)

...(18 TOTAL)

TOWNHOUSE100% L1




drawn

checked

approved

project

drawing title

rev.

project no.

drawing no.

RB

2-16-334

CF

CF

RB

N/A 2017 JAN 16


P : 604.569.6500F : 604.569.6501


W : AESengr.com

1


1200A MAINCIRCUIT

BREAKER

200A200 A

500 kVA25 kV - 208Y/120V

BC HYDROPADMOUNT

COMMONAREA

LOADS

200 A

BCH BCH BCH






(WITHIN RES UNIT)

...(18 TOTAL)

TOWNHOUSE100% L2




drawn

checked

approved

project

drawing title

rev.

project no.

drawing no.

RB

2-16-334

CF

CF

RB

N/A 2017 JAN 16


P : 604.569.6500F : 604.569.6501


W : AESengr.com

1


800A MAINCIRCUIT

BREAKER

200 A125 A

300 kVA25 kV - 208Y/120V

BC HYDROPADMOUNT

COMMONAREA

LOADS

125 A

BCH BCH BCH






(WITHIN RES UNIT)

...(18 TOTAL)

TOWNHOUSE100% L2, 2-SHARED




drawn

checked

approved

project

drawing title

rev.

project no.

drawing no.

RB

2-16-334

CF

CF

RB

N/A 2017 JAN 16


P : 604.569.6500F : 604.569.6501


W : AESengr.com

1


City of Richmond


APPENDIX D Appendix E Metering Data


Appendix E | Page 1


FIGURE 1 – ARCHETYPE 1 (BLDG A) TENANTS CURRENT METERING


Appendix E | Page 2


FIGURE 2 – ARCHETYPE 1 (BLDG A) TENANTS VOLTAGE METERING


Appendix E | Page 3


FIGURE 3 – ARCHETYPE 1 (BLDG A) TENANTS POWER METERING


Appendix E | Page 4


FIGURE 4 – ARCHETYPE 1 (BLDG A) HOUSE CURRENT METERING


Appendix E | Page 5


FIGURE 5 – ARCHETYPE 1 (BLDG A) TENANTS POWER DEMAND FOR TYPICAL DAY


Appendix E | Page 6


FIGURE 6 – ARCHETYPE 1 (BLDG A) HOUSE POWER DEMAND FOR TYPICAL DAY


Appendix E | Page 7


FIGURE 7 – ARCHETYPE 1 (BLDG A) BUILDING POWER DEMAND FOR TYPICAL DAY


Appendix E | Page 8


FIGURE 8 – ARCHETYPE 1 (BLDG B) TENANTS CURRENT METERING


Appendix E | Page 9


FIGURE 9 – ARCHETYPE 1 (BLDG B) TENANTS POWER METERING


Appendix E | Page 10


FIGURE 10 – ARCHETYPE 1 (BLDG B) HOUSE POWER DEMAND FOR TYPICAL DAY


Appendix E | Page 11


FIGURE 11 – ARCHETYPE 1 (BLDG B) HOUSE POWER DEMAND FOR TYPICAL DAY


City of Richmond


APPENDIX D Appendix F Proposed CEC Changes


City of Richmond

Appendix E | Page 1


Proposal to amend the Canadian Electrical Code, Part I

Section 8

(Proposal for the 2nd round of deliberations)

Submitted on December 11, 2016 by: D. Chandler, Vancouver Electric Vehicle Association

([email protected] / 604-224-1136)

Primary Intent: 2,4

(1) Improve safety (2) Address new technology (3) Clarify existing wording

(4) Correlate with product standard requirements

(5) Correlate with the NEC, NBC or other relevant standard such as C22.2 No. 1, C282, or Z32, etc.

Requests:

(A) Add new definitions to Rule 8-002

Rule 8-002 Special terminology (see Appendix B)

Control of electric vehicle supply equipment loads – the predetermined process of connecting,

disconnecting, increasing, or reducing electric power to electric vehicle supply equipment loads.

Electric Vehicle Energy Management System – a means of controlling electric vehicle supply

equipment loads comprised of any of the following: a monitor(s), communications equipment,

a controller(s), a timer(s) and other applicable device(s).

(B) Add New Subrule 8-106(11)

8-106 Use of demand factors (see Appendix B)

(11) Where electric vehicle supply equipment loads are controlled by an Electric Vehicle

Energy Management System, the demand load for the electric vehicle supply

equipment shall be equal to the maximum load allowed by the Electric Vehicle Energy

Management System.

Subject No. 4166 Chair: A. Tsisserev Updated: January 10, 2017

Title: Demand loads for electric vehicle supply equipment where energy management systems are installed.

mailto:[email protected]


City of Richmond

Appendix E | Page 2


(12) For the purposes of Rules 8-200(1)(a)(vi), 8-202(3)(d), 8-204(1)(d), 8-206(1)(d), 8-

208(1)(d) and 8-210(b), where an Electric Vehicle Energy Management System

described in 8-106(11), monitors the consumer's service and/or feeders and controls

the electric vehicle supply equipment loads in accordance with Rule 8-500, the demand

load for the electric vehicle supply equipment is not required to be considered in

determination of the calculated load.

(C) Modify Item 8-200(1)(a)(vi)

8-200 Single dwellings (see Appendices B and I)

(1) The minimum ampacity of service or feeder conductors supplying a single dwelling shall be

based on the greater of Item (a) or (b):

(a)

(vi) except as permitted by Rule 8-106(12) any electric vehicle supply equipment loads

with a demand factor of 100%; plus

(D) Modify Item 8-202(3)(d)

8-202 Apartment and similar buildings (see Appendix B)

(3) The minimum ampacity of service or feeder conductors from a main service supplying two

or more dwelling units shall be based on the calculated load obtained from Subrule (1)(a)

and the following:

(d) except as permitted by Rule 8-106(12), any electric vehicle supply equipment loads not

located in dwelling units shall be added with a demand factor as specified in Table XY;

and

(E) Modify 8-204

8-204 Schools (1) The minimum ampacity of service or feeder conductors shall be based on the following:

(a) (a) a basic load of 50 W/m2 of classroom area; plus

(b) (b) 10 W/m2 of the remaining area of the building based on the outside dimensions;

plus

(c) (c) electric space-heating, air-conditioning, and total loads of other permanently

connected equipment based on the rating of the equipment installed; plus

(d) except as permitted by Rule 8-106(12), any electric vehicle supply equipment loads

with a demand factor as specified in Table XY; plus

(e) cord-connected equipment intended for connection to receptacles rated more than 125

V or 20 A based on

(i) 80% of the rating of the receptacle; or

(ii) the rating of the equipment intended for connection to the receptacle.


City of Richmond

Appendix E | Page 3


(F) Modify 8-206

8-206 Hospitals

(1) The minimum ampacity of service or feeder conductors shall be based on the following:

(a) a basic load of 20 W/m2 of the area of the building based on the outside dimensions;

plus

(b) 100 W/m2 for high-intensity areas such as operating rooms; plus

(c) electric space-heating, air-conditioning, and total loads of other permanently connected

equipment based on the rating of the equipment installed; plus




V or 20 A based on



(G) Modify 8-208

8-208 Hotels, motels, dormitories, and buildings of similar occupancy (see Appendix B) (1) The minimum ampacity of service or feeder conductors shall be based on the following:

(a) a basic load of 20 W/m2 of the area of the building, based on the outside dimensions;

plus

(b) lighting loads for special areas such as ballrooms, based on the rating of the equipment

installed; plus

(c) electric space-heating, air-conditioning, and total loads of other permanently connected

equipment based on the rating of the equipment installed; plus




V or 20 A based on



(H) Modify Item 8-210

8-210 Other types of occupancy

The minimum ampacity of service or feeder conductors for the types of occupancies listed in

Table 14 shall be based on

(a) a basic load in watts per square metre as required by Table 14 for the area of the

occupancy served based on the outside dimensions of the occupancy, with application

of demand factors as indicated in Table 14; plus

(b) special loads such as electric space-heating, air-conditioning, motor loads, show window

lighting, stage lighting, etc., based on the rating of the equipment installed with

demand factors permitted by this Code.

(c) except as permitted by Rule 8-106(12), any electric vehicle supply equipment loads

with a demand factor as specified in Table XY.


City of Richmond

Appendix E | Page 4


(I) Add new Subsection for energy management systems

Electric vehicle energy management systems

8-500 Electric Vehicle Energy Management Systems

(1) Electric vehicle energy management systems shall be permitted to monitor electrical loads

and/or to control electric vehicle supply equipment loads,

(2) An electric vehicle energy management system shall not cause the load of a branch circuit,

feeder, or service to exceed requirements of Rules 8-104(5) or 8-104(6).

(3) Where an electric vehicle energy management system is employed to control electrical

power through the use of a remote means, a directory identifying the controlled electrical

equipment shall be posted on the enclosure of the controlled electrical equipment.

(J) Add Appendix B Note for Subrule 8-106(11)

Rule 8-106(11)

It is intended by this Rule that the loads of the electric vehicle supply equipment which are

controlled by an electric vehicle energy management system, should be considered to have a

demand within the maximum limits allowed by the electric vehicle energy management

system.

The electric vehicle energy management system is provided with a maximum load rating which

will determine the circuit, feeder and service loadings.

(K) Add Appendix B Note for Rule 8-510(3)

Rule 8-510(3)

The use of the term remote is intended to convey that a controller can be operated via another

means or location through communications without a direct operator interface with the

controlled device.


City of Richmond

Appendix E | Page 5


(L) Add new Table XY

Table XY

Electric vehicle supply equipment demand factors

(See Rules 8-202 and 8-210)

Number of automobile spaces

or stalls

Maximum load per stall

(Watts)

Demand factor (%)

1 to 4

2000

4000

6000

8000 or more

100

100

100

100

5 to 8

2000

4000

6000

8000 or more

100

100

90

90

9 to 12

2000

4000

6000

8000 or more

100

90

90

80

13 to 16

2000

4000

6000

8000 or more

100

90

80

80

17-24

2000

4000

6000

8000 or more

100

90

80

70

25 and over

2000

4000

6000

8000 or more

100

90

70

70

(M) Request that Section 86 subcommittee initiates the subject – to revise Rule 86-300(2) as

follows (revised wording is shown on the yellow background in the bold underlined text).

(2) Notwithstanding Subrule (1), electric vehicle supply equipment shall be permitted to be supplied

from a branch circuit supplying another load(s), provided that an Electric-Vehicle Energy

Management System is installed in accordance with Subrule 8-106(11) or Subrule 8-106 (12).

control equipment prevents simultaneous operation of the electric vehicle supply equipment with

other circuit loads such that the calculated demand of the circuit is not exceeded.


City of Richmond


APPENDIX D Appendix G EVSE Performance Analysis


City of Richmond

Appendix G | Page 1


1.0 PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS

1.1 GENERAL

Performance analysis of the various charging system configurations is based on the ability of the charging

system to transfer power from the building to the EV’s.

POWER IN POWER TRANSFER POWER OUT

FIGURE F1: POWER FLOW

Power in: Power from the building electrical system.

Power transfer: Power transferred by the charging system.

Power out: Battery charge required by the EV’s.

1.2 POWER IN

The power available from the building for each of the archetypes is as follows.

ARCHETYPE

BUILDING

CAPACITY

(kW)

PEAK

DEMAND

(kW)

CAPACITY

FOR CHARGING

(kW)

CAPACITY FOR

CHARGING

(kWh/day)

High Rise – City Centre 900 315 585 4,680

Mid Rise – City Centre 900 405 495 3,960

Mid Rise – Outside City Centre 675 270 405 3,240

Townhouse – Outside City Centre 270 150 120 960

TABLE F1: POWER IN

BUILDING

CAPACITY

CHARGING

SYSTEM

DRIVING

DISTANCE


City of Richmond

Appendix G | Page 2


1.3 POWER OUT

The power out represents the charge requirement of the EV’s, as follows.

ARCHETYPE EV’s

(No.)

DISTANCE

REQUIREMENT

(km/day)

CHARGING

REQUIREMENT

(kWh/day)

High Rise – City Centre 108 7,020 1,299

Mid Rise – City Centre 126 8,190 1,515

Mid Rise – Outside City Centre 136 8,840 1,635

Townhouse – Outside City Centre 36 2,340 433

TABLE F2: POWER OUT

Charging requirement (kWh/day) = Energy (kWh) consumed per day per EV x number of EV’s

Energy consumed per day (kWh) = Distance driven per day (km) x Energy Consumption rate (kWh/km)

Distance driven per day = 65km (allowance). The 65km allowance is considered appropriate, based on the

following:

• Average distance driven per day in Vancouver is 45km; (16,400km/yr).

• 95% of daily distances driven are less than 177km.

• Multiple consecutive days with daily driving distances in excess of the charging allowance will require

supplementation through the use of public DC fast charging.

Energy Consumption rate = 0.185kWh/km. The majority of vehicles being small or medium passenger

vehicles, with a battery size of 300kWh. Factors to be considered for descriptive (as opposed to prescriptive)

performance level recommendations also include:

• Variability of daily driving distances based on the distribution of daily driving distances for BC

environmental and geographic factors such as temperature, rain, snow, wind, and elevation, which have

a considerable impact on energy consumption.

• Demographics of the residents of the building and/or community including factors such as age,

workplace commuting patterns, and family situation.

• The majority of vehicles being small or medium passenger vehicles with an efficiency of 185 – 200

Wh/km, and a battery size of 300kWh.

• The majority of vehicles arriving at the residence between 4pm and 9pm and typically leaving no earlier

than 6am.


City of Richmond

Appendix G | Page 3


1.4 POWER TRANSFER

The power transfer represents the charge delivered to the EV’s, as follows.

ARCHETYPE/CONFIGURATION POWER TRANSFER (kWh/day)

High Rise – City Centre

Dedicated L1 (120V, 20A) 1,182


2-Shared/managed L2 (208V, 40A) 2,732

4-shared/managed L2 (208V, 40A) 1,366

18-shared/managed L2 (208V, 80A trunk, 40A connection) 607

Mid Rise – City Centre






Mid Rise – Outside City Centre






Townhouse – Outside City Centre

Dedicated L1 (120V, 20A) 394


2-Shared/managed L2 (208V, 40A) 911

TABLE F3: POWER TRANSFER

Power transfer (kWh/day) = Charging capacity (kW) x charging time/day (h)

Charging capacity (kWh) = Number of circuits x Volts (circuit) x Amps (circuit) x derating x efficiency / 1000

Charging time/day (h) = 8 hours (10pm to 6am to avoid peak building electrical demand period)

Derating = 80% (for continuous load)

Efficiency = 95% (allowance for charger efficiency, including power factor)

e.g. Power transfer (kWh/day) for 4-shared/managed L2 (208V, 40A) for High Rise Archetype

= 108 stalls/4stalls per circuit x 208V x 40A x 0.8 x 0.95 x 8h / 1000

= 1, 366 kWh/day


City of Richmond

Appendix G | Page 4


1.5 CONFIGURATION PERFORMANCE

The performance of the various configurations is as follows.

ARCHETYPE CHARGING PERFORMANCE (kW/EV)

Dedicated L1

(120V, 20A) 1.368

Dedicated L2

(208V, 40A) 6.323

2-Shared/managed L2

(208V, 40A) 3.167 – 6.323 (average: 4.75)

4-shared/managed L2

(208V, 40A) 1.581 – 6.323 (average: 2.25)

18-shared/managed L2

(208V, 80A trunk, 40A connection) 0.703 – 6.323 (average: 1.77)

TABLE F4: CONFIGURATION PERFORMANCE

Charging Performance (kW/EV) = Volts (circuit) x Amps (circuit) x derating x efficiency / 1000 / number of

chargers on a circuit.

The charging performance for an EV connected to a load shared/managed configuration depends on the

number of EV’s charging on the shared circuit at any given time. Statistical analysis techniques provide the

basis for calculation of average charging performance per EV.


City of Richmond

Appendix G | Page 5


1.6 SUMMARY

The summary for power in, power transfer, and power out is as follows.

ARCHETYPE

POWER IN

(BUILDING CAPACITY)

(kWh/day)

POWER TRANSFER

(CHARGERS)

(kWh/day)

POWER OUT

(CHARGING REQUIREMENT)

(kWh/day)

High Rise – City Centre

Dedicated L1

(120V, 20A) 4,680 1,182 1,299

Dedicated L2

(208V, 40A) 5,463

2-Shared/managed L2

(208V, 40A) 2,732

4-shared/managed L2

(208V, 40A) 1,366


(208V, 80A trunk, 40A connection) 607

Mid Rise – City Centre

Dedicated L1

(120V, 20A) 3,960 1,379 1,515

Dedicated L2

(208V, 40A) 6,374

2-Shared/managed L2

(208V, 40A) 3,187

4-shared/managed L2

(208V, 40A) 1,366



Mid Rise – Outside City Centre

Dedicated L1

(120V, 20A) 3,240 1,488 1,635

Dedicated L2

(208V, 40A) 6,880

2-Shared/managed L2

(208V, 40A) 3,440

4-shared/managed L2

(208V, 40A) 1,720



Townhouse – Outside City Centre

Dedicated L1

(120V, 20A) 960 394 433

Dedicated L2

(208V, 40A) 1,821

2-Shared/managed L2

(208V, 40A) 911

TABLE F5: SUMMARY


City of Richmond

Appendix G | Page 6


1.7 PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS

Maximum km for 4-shared (power transfer = power required)

Maximum Power Transfer (kWh/EV) = Volts (circuit) x Amps (circuit) x derating x efficiency / 1000 / number

EV’s on shared circuit

Maximum Power Out = Maximum Distance (km) x Energy Consumption rate (kWh/km)

Maximum Distance = Maximum Power Out / Energy Consumption rate (kWh/km)

Maximum Power Transfer (kWh/EV) = 208 x 40 x 0.8 x 0.95 x 8 /1000 / 4 = 12.65 kWh

Maximum Distance = 12.65 (kWh) / 0.185 (kWh/km) = 68.35 km

2.0 CONCLUSIONS

2.1 GENERAL

The Level 2 configurations, with sharing of up to 4 EVSE’s on a 40A, 208V circuit, or equivalent (additional

EVSE’s on a circuit of greater ampacity), achieve the minimum recommended performance level. This

should not be interpreted as precluding alternate configurations, provided they can reasonably be shown to

achieve the intent of the minimum performance level for a specific installation. The ability to review

proposed alternatives and enforce the minimum performance level requirements should be considered in

determination of the most appropriate solution for the City.


City of Richmond


Appendix H Right-to-Charge Legislation


City of Richmond

Appendix H | Page 1


1.0 RIGHT-TO-CHARGE LEGISLATION

1.1 CALIFORNIA EXAMPLE

Assembly Bill No. 2565

CHAPTER 529

An act to add Sections 1947.6 and 1952.7 to the Civil Code, relating to tenancy.

[Approved by Governor September 21, 2014. Filed with Secretary of State September 21, 2014.]

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1947.6 is added to the Civil Code, to read:

1947.6.

(a) For any lease executed, extended, or renewed on and after July 1, 2015, a lessor of a dwelling shall approve a written

request of a lessee to install an electric vehicle charging station at a parking space allotted for the lessee that meets

the requirements of this section and complies with the lessor’s procedural approval process for modification to the

property.

(b) This section does not apply to residential rental properties where:

(1) Electric vehicle charging stations already exist for lessees in a ratio that is equal to or greater than 10 percent of

the designated parking spaces.

(2) Parking is not provided as part of the lease agreement.

(3) A property where there are less than five parking spaces.

(4) A dwelling that is subject to the residential rent control ordinance of a public entity.

(c) For purposes of this section, “electric vehicle charging station” or “charging station” means any level of electric vehicle

supply equipment station that is designed and built in compliance with Article 625 of the California Electrical Code, as

it reads on the effective date of this section, and delivers electricity from a source outside an electric vehicle into a

plug-in electric vehicle.

(d) A lessor shall not be obligated to provide an additional parking space to a lessee in order to accommodate an electric

vehicle charging station.

(e) If the electric vehicle charging station has the effect of providing the lessee with a reserved parking space, the lessor

may charge a monthly rental amount for that parking space.

(f) An electric vehicle charging station and all modifications and improvements to the property shall comply with federal,

state, and local law, and all applicable zoning requirements, land use requirements, and covenants, conditions, and

restrictions.

(g) A lessee’s written request to make a modification to the property in order to install and use an electric vehicle charging

station shall include, but is not limited to, his or her consent to enter into a written agreement that includes, but is not

limited to, the following:

(1) Compliance with the lessor’s requirements for the installation, use, maintenance, and removal of the charging

station and installation, use, and maintenance of the infrastructure for the charging station.

(2) Compliance with the lessor’s requirements for the lessee to provide a complete financial analysis and scope of

work regarding the installation of the charging station and its infrastructure.

(3) A written description of how, when, and where the modifications and improvements to the property are proposed

to be made consistent with those items specified in the “Permitting Checklist” of the “Zero-Emission Vehicles in

California: Community Readiness Guidebook” published by the Office of Planning and Research.


City of Richmond

Appendix H | Page 2


(4) Obligation of the lessee to pay the lessor all costs associated with the lessor’s installation of the charging station

and its infrastructure prior to any modification or improvement being made to the leased property. The costs

associated with modifications and improvements shall include, but are not limited to, the cost of permits,

supervision, construction, and, solely if required by the contractor, consistent with its past performance of work

for the lessor, performance bonds.

(5) Obligation of the lessee to pay as part of rent for the costs associated with the electrical usage of the charging

station, and cost for damage, maintenance, repair, removal, and replacement of the charging station, and

modifications or improvements made to the property associated with the charging station.

(h) The lessee shall maintain in full force and effect a lessee’s general liability insurance policy in the amount of one

million dollars ($1,000,000) and shall name the lessor as a named additional insured under the policy commencing

with the date of approval of construction until the lessee forfeits possession of the dwelling to the lessor.

1.2 POSSIBLE CLAUSES FOR CITY OF RICHMOND

(a) A strata corporation shall approve a written request of a dwelling owner to install an electric vehicle charging station

at a parking space allotted for, or owned by, the dwelling owner that meets the requirements of this section and

complies with the strata corporation's procedural approval process for modification to the property.

A strata corporation shall permit an owner to use a charge station that is installed provided the owner complies with

all the conditions in this by-law and shall ensure the electrified infrastructure is enabled.

A strata corporation shall ensure that appropriate billing rules are in place for electric vehicle charging.

(b) For purposes of this section, “electric vehicle charging station” or “charging station” means any level of electric vehicle

supply equipment station that is designed and built in compliance with CSA C22.2 No. 280-16 Electric Vehicle Supply

Equipment (or DCFC standard), and delivers electricity from a source outside an electric vehicle into a plug-in electric

vehicle.

(c) A strata corporation shall not be obligated to provide an additional parking space to an owner in order to accommodate

an electric vehicle charging station.

(d) An electric vehicle charging station and modifications and improvements to the property shall comply with federal,

provincial, and local law, and all applicable zoning requirements, land use requirements, and covenants, conditions,

and restrictions.

(e) An owner’s written request to make a modification to the property in order to install and/or use an electric vehicle

charging station shall include, but is not limited to, his or her consent to enter into a written agreement that includes,

but is not limited to, the following:

(1) Compliance with the strata corporation's rules for the installation, use, maintenance, and removal of the charging

station.

(2) Compliance with the strata corporation's requirements for the owner to provide a complete financial analysis and

scope of work regarding the installation of the charging station and its infrastructure.

(3) A written description of how, when, and where the modifications and improvements to the property are proposed

to be made consistent with existing electrical infrastructure and accommodation of future installations by other

owners.

(4) Obligation of the owner to pay all costs associated with installation of the charging station and the cost of the

charging station, prior to any modification or improvement being made to the leased property. The costs

associated with modifications and improvements shall include, but are not limited to, the cost of permits,

supervision, construction, and, solely if required by the contractor, consistent with its past performance of work

for the strata corporation, performance bonds.

(5) Obligation of the owner to pay costs associated with the electrical usage of the charging station, operational and

administrative fees including billing fees, and cost for damage, maintenance, repair, removal, and replacement

of the charging station.

(6) The strata corporation shall retain ownership of all electrical infrastructure to the final outlet.

(7) The owner shall retain ownership of the electric vehicle supply equipment and the connection to the final outlet.


City of Richmond


Appendix I Load Calculations


City of Richmond

Appendix I | Page 1

High Rise

100 Suites

Suite Descriptions Quantity

Between 45 sqm to 90 sqm (485 sqft to 970 sqft) 80


Typical Suite Load (Suite < 90 sqm) Load (Suite < 90 sqm)

Basic Load for first 45 sqm 3,500 3,500

Basic Load for next 45 sqm 1,500 1,500

Basic Load for next 90 sqm - 1,000

Electric Range 6,000 6,000

Dryer (@ 25%) 1,000 1,000

Sub Total (excluding heating) 12,000 13,000

Electric Heating @ 35W/sqm 3,150 4,200

Total 15,150 17,200

Suite Loads Suite < 90 sqm Suite > 90 sqm Total Load (W)

First suite @ 100% - 13,000 13,000

Second and Third Suites @ 65% - 16,900 16,900

Fourth and Fifth Suites @ 40% - 10,400 10,400

Next 15 suites @ 25% - 48,750 48,750

Remaining suites @ 10% 96,000 - 96,000

Suites Sub Total (excluding heating) 185,050

Electric Heating - First 10kW @ 100% 10,000

Electric Heating - Remainder @ 75% 244,500

Suites Electric Heating Total 254,500

439,550

Base Building Loads Load (W) Demand Factor Total Load (W)

2 Elevators @ 50 HP each 74,570 0.95 70,841

Fire Pump @ 75 HP 55,927 1.00 55,927

Electric Heating - First 10kW @ 100% 10,000 1.00 10,000

Electric Heating - Remainder @ 75% 35,000 0.75 26,250

Pumps @ 100 HP 74,570 0.75 55,927

Exhaust / Make Up Air @ 100 HP 74,570 0.75 55,927

Lighting & Power - Common Areas (500sqm @ 30W/sqm) 15,000 1.00 15,000

Lighting & Power - Parkade (3200sqm @ 6W/sqm) 19,200 1.00 19,200

Total (Base Building Loads) 309,074

Summary Load (W) Demand Factor Total Load (W)

Suite Loads 439,550 1 439,550

Base Building Loads 309,074 1.25 386,342

Total Building Load (Without EV Charging) 825,892

Electric Vehicle Charging Additional Load (W) Incremental Load (%)

Scenario 0 : 20% Level 1 Infrastructure 42,240 5.11


Scenario 2 : 100% Level 1 Infrastructure (No Load Sharing) 207,360 25.11


Scenario 3 : 100% Level 2 Infrastructure (Load Sharing) 179,712 21.76

Total (Suite Loads)


City of Richmond

Appendix I | Page 2

Mid Rise (City Center)

100 Suites




Typical Suite Load (Suite < 90 sqm) Load (Suite > 90 sqm)





Dryer (@ 25%) 1,000 1,000



Total 15,150 17,200


First suite @ 100% - 13,000 13,000



Next 15 suites @ 25% - 48,750 48,750

Remaining suites @ 10% 24,000 78,000 102,000





492,800


2 Elevators @ 50 HP each 74,570 0.95 70,841

Fire Pump @ 75 HP 55,927 1.00 55,927


Electric Heating - Remainder @ 75% 35,000 0.75 26,250

Pumps @ 75 HP 55,927 0.75 41,946






Suite Loads 492,800 1 492,800









Total (Suite Loads)


City of Richmond

Appendix I | Page 3

Mid Rise (Outside City Center)

80 Suites









Dryer (@ 25%) 1,000 1,000



Total 15,150 17,200


First suite @ 100% - 13,000 13,000



Next 15 suites @ 25% - 48,750 48,750

Remaining suites @ 10% 24,000 52,000 76,000





403,800



Electric Heating - Remainder @ 75% - 0.75 -

Pumps @ 15 HP 11,185 0.75 8,389





Suite Loads 403,800 1 403,800









Total (Suite Loads)


City of Richmond

Appendix I | Page 4

Townhouse

18 Suites - 2 STALLS EACH





Basic Load for first 45 sqm - 3,500



Electric Range - 6,000

Dryer (@ 25%) - 1,000

Sub Total (excluding heating) - 13,000

Electric Heating @ 35W/sqm - 5,250

Total - 18,250


First suite @ 100% - 13,000 13,000



Next 15 suites @ 25% - 42,250 42,250

Remaining suites @ 10% - - -





155,925


Pumps @ 15 HP 11,185 0.75 8,389




Suite Loads 155,925 1 155,925









Total (Suite Loads)


City of Richmond


Appendix J Definitions


City of Richmond

Appendix J | Page 1


1.0 DEFINITIONS

1.1 ABBREVIATIONS

A: Ampere

AC: Alternating Current

CSA: Canadian Standards Association

DC: Direct Current

Energized: Refer to the definition in Section 2.0.

EV: Electric Vehicle

EVSE: Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment

GHG: Greenhouse Gas

Partial EV Infrastructure: Refer to the definition in Section 2.0.

kWh: Kilo-Watt Hour

kW: Kilo-Watt

MURB: Multi User Residential Building

V: Volts

1.2 CHARGING LEVELS

There are a number of standards with different definitions for charging levels. For the purpose of this report,

the charging level definitions are as follows.

CHARGE METHOD Nominal Supply

(Volts)

Maximum Current

(Amps)

Level 1 120V, 1-phase 12A

Level 2 208 to 240V AC, 1-phase 20 – 80A

DC Fast Charging 480V DC -


City of Richmond

Appendix J | Page 2


1.3 REPORT SPECIFIC

Load management: Control of the current drawn by the EVSE, at the main switchboard of the building.

Load sharing: Control of the current drawn by multiple EVSE on a single circuit, to ensure the capacity of the

circuit is not exceeded, and that maximum charging is achieved at each EVSE based on the available

capacity.


City of Richmond


Appendix K Example Bylaw


Appendix K | Page 1


1.0 EXAMPLE BYLAW

1.1 POSSIBLE CLAUSES FOR CITY OF RICHMOND

(a) Provide Energized EV charging Infrastructure for all parking stalls, to meet a minimum performance

level of 12 kWh per EVSE, over an eight (8) hour overnight period.

(b) Load management and/or sharing may be implemented.

(c) Provide dedicated revenue-grade metering (one meter per building) on the main supply to EVSE

electrical distribution equipment.

Definitions:

Energized: All infrastructure required for charging of an electric vehicle (EV), including all electrical

equipment (including metering), cabling and associated raceways, and connections, with

exception of the Level 2 EVSE equipment;

EV: Electrical Vehicle;

EVSE: Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment (i.e. charger);

kWh: kilowatt hour;

Load Management: Control of the current drawn by the EVSE, at the main switchboard of the building;

Load sharing: Control of the current drawn by multiple EVSE on a single circuit, to ensure the capacity of

the circuit is not exceeded, and that maximum charging is achieved at each EVSE based on

the available capacity.

Explanatory notes:

A 40A 208V connection to each parking stall, with circuit sharing of up to four stalls per branch circuit, or

equivalent (additional chargers on a circuit of greater ampacity) is sufficient to provide the minimum

charging requirement. This is based on provision of load sharing to maximize utilization of circuit ampacity,

and to benefit from the capacity pooling effect of sharing, in lieu of restricting each charger to a maximum

of 25% of the circuit ampacity.

The above statements should not be interpreted to preclude the use of alternate configurations to achieve

the minimum performance level. It is highlighted that it is not the intent to limit the options of designers,

only to establish a minimum performance level to be achieved. Alternate configurations that can reasonably

be verified to achieve the minimum recommended performance level for a specific installation are

acceptable. Solutions that provide an improved performance level are particularly encouraged.


City of Richmond


Appendix L Acknowledgements


City of Richmond

Appendix L | Page 1


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

AES would like to acknowledge the contributions of the following people, and organizations:

1. Don Chandler – Electric Vehicle expert and controls specialist.

Don provided an extensive knowledge of electric vehicles and electric vehicle charging that was instrumental

in the development of the report.

2. Mott Electric GP – Electrical Contractor.

Mott Electric provided review of the electrical cost estimates prepared by AES based on RSMeans 2017.

3. Steve Gertsman

Steve provided assistance with the metering analysis performed as part of the investigations.

4. Alliance Real Estate Group Ltd.

Alliance provided assistance with the metering analysis performed as part of the investigations.


City of Richmond


END OF REPORT

report for electric vehicle charging infrastructure in new

Documents