relative employment positions of partners and gender relations in russia and france
DESCRIPTION
Relative employment positions of partners and gender relations in Russia and France. Ariane Pailhé (INED) Oxana Sinyavskaya (IISP). Research objectives. To compare employment status professional position of each cohabitant partner Differences between Russia and France: - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
ECODEF/CI, Moscow, November 28-29, 2007
Relative employment positions of partners and gender relations in Russia and France
Ariane Pailhé (INED)
Oxana Sinyavskaya (IISP)
ECODEF/CI, Moscow, November 28-29, 2007
Research objectives
To compare employment status professional position of each cohabitant partner
Differences between Russia and France: Economic conditions, labour market situation Household composition: presence of children, presence of other adults
Differences in gender relations Relative resources of partners: age gap and education gap Values: gender attitudes & religiosity
ECODEF/CI, Moscow, November 28-29, 2007
Data & Sample GGS, Wave 1st: Russia (2004), France (2005) Sample:
Co-resident couples with both partners aged 20-60 Exclusion of students and disabled Russia: 5155 obs.; France: 4499 obs.
Employed = R’s and P’s main activity - paid work or entrepreneurship/self-employment or maternity leave & working pensioners (Russia only)
ECODEF/CI, Moscow, November 28-29, 2007
A comparable distribution of couple employment status
63 59
22 25
8 10
8 6
France Russia
both not-employed
woman employed, mannot-emp
man employed, womannot-emp
both employed
ECODEF/CI, Moscow, November 28-29, 2007
Much more female part-time in France (wage earners)
65,8
92,8
30,6
4,7
France Russia
both part-time
man - part-timewoman - part-timeboth - full-time
ECODEF/CI, Moscow, November 28-29, 2007
Longer working time in Russia medians of working hours
France
Males = 39 h (FT: 40h) Females = 35 h (FT: 36)
Median = 5 h
Russia
Males = 41 h Females = 40 h
Median = 1 h
Both partners employed; wage earners + self-employed; main job only
Working hours gap (male – female)
ECODEF/CI, Moscow, November 28-29, 2007
More men in public employment in Russia
1227
20
2510
11
58
37
France Russia
Both in private or mixed
Man – in state, woman – inprivate or mixed
Man in private or mixed,woman – in state sector
Both in state sector
Both employed; wage earners + self-employed; main job
42%
63%
ECODEF/CI, Moscow, November 28-29, 2007
More gender segregation in Russia
Duncan index ISCO classification 2 digits (29 cat.)
France: 47.0Russia: 55.7
ECODEF/CI, Moscow, November 28-29, 2007
More income difference between working partners in Russia
France Mean = 2.06 Median = 1.36
Russia Mean = 2.24 Median = 1.44
Both employed; wage earners; main job incomes (incl. bonuses, etc.)
Labor income ratio (male / female)
ECODEF/CI, Moscow, November 28-29, 2007
Couple labour market participation: Estimation procedure Multinomial logit model Couple employment status:
both employed, man employed only, woman employed only, both not-employed
ECODEF/CI, Moscow, November 28-29, 2007
Variables of interest Partners’ relative resources
Age gap : man 3 + years older /woman 3 + years older / same age
Educational gap: man 2 + levels higher / woman 2 + levels higher / same level
Values Gender values index Religiosity: country specific (frequency of religious
services attendance/ values + attendance)
ECODEF/CI, Moscow, November 28-29, 2007
Gender value index
France Mean = 22.2 Median = 23.0
Russia Mean = 15.4 Median = 16.0
Index = sum of 8 variablesEx: When parents are in need, daughters should take more caring responsibility than sons
Min 0 (traditional), max 32 (progressive)
quartiles (1, 2-3, 4)
ECODEF/CI, Moscow, November 28-29, 2007
Other explanatory variables
Human capital Male age, agesq Male education
Household compositions Number of children (0-2, 3-5, 6-13, 14-19) Number of adults (Russia only) Partners are immigrant/not
Regional characteristics Settlement Regional unemployment rate
Other Non labor incomes (Russia only)
ECODEF/CI, Moscow, November 28-29, 2007
Estimation results (1/2)
Different effect of gender values: Non significant in Russia In France, most traditional -
Relative resources of partners: Different effect of age gap
not significant in Russia, men older + in France
Same effect of education gap women more educated than men +, less educated – Stronger effect for Russia
ECODEF/CI, Moscow, November 28-29, 2007
Estimation results (2/2)
Household composition: Common feature: presence of children – Stronger effect for children < 14 in Russia but lower
effect for children >14 Effect of regional unemployment rate
- in Russia & France, stronger effect in France Other factors
Common features: Age and education + Differences: immigrants – in France
ECODEF/CI, Moscow, November 28-29, 2007
Conclusions Similar couple participation patterns in France and Russia
Women work a little less in Russia Household composition (having young children) matters in both countries,
more in Russia
Russian people have more traditional gender attitudes comparing to French people But gender values do not play on participation in Russia while they do in
France The relative resources of partners matter in both countries, more in Russia
Russia: objective resources, not attitudes, matter for labour market participation
In France both matter
Next steps: Different types of jobs for men and women in Russia and France More gender wage inequality in Russia