regional prioritization of freight networks

22
BRUCE LAMBERT REGIONAL PRIORITIZATION OF FREIGHT NETWORKS

Upload: nedra

Post on 22-Feb-2016

33 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Regional Prioritization of Freight Networks. Bruce Lambert. does understanding the big picture matter?. Will imports/exports go up or down in 10 years? Where will people live in twenty years? Where will the state see more truck traffic? What if we go to heavier/longer trucks? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Regional Prioritization of Freight Networks

B R U C E L A M B E RT

REGIONAL PRIORITIZATION OF FREIGHT NETWORKS

Page 2: Regional Prioritization of Freight Networks

DOES UNDERSTANDING THE BIG PICTURE MATTER?

• Will imports/exports go up or down in 10 years?• Where will people live in twenty years?• Where will the state see more truck traffic?• What if we go to heavier/longer trucks?• What if the State attracts more manufacturing,

energy jobs?• Truck parking issues? • What is my neighbor doing?

• What will this change and where?

Page 3: Regional Prioritization of Freight Networks
Page 4: Regional Prioritization of Freight Networks

4

METRO ATLANTA’S U.S. “TRADING PARTNERS”

Truck: Almost 2/3 of all truck tonnage goes to/from SASHTO states

Rail: Most freight rail to/from AL, KY, VA, LA, IL & throughout the U.S.

Source: 2007 TRANSEARCH data.

Page 5: Regional Prioritization of Freight Networks
Page 6: Regional Prioritization of Freight Networks

MISSISSIPPI’S MAIN MULTIMODAL CORRIDORS

Page 7: Regional Prioritization of Freight Networks

SHARE OF TRUCKS THROUGH LOUISVILLE

Page 8: Regional Prioritization of Freight Networks

AHDT POSTED DETOUR ROUTE

Page 9: Regional Prioritization of Freight Networks

PRE-SCENARIO FAF TRUCK FLOWS (REGIONAL)

Page 10: Regional Prioritization of Freight Networks

CHANGE IN FAF TRUCK FLOWS (REGIONAL)

18% Increase

28% Increase

Page 11: Regional Prioritization of Freight Networks

FPM REGIONAL ANALYSIS

Page 12: Regional Prioritization of Freight Networks

http://www.wired.com/magazine/2011/05/ff_jobsi85/

COMPLEX INTESTATE CONNECTIONS

Page 13: Regional Prioritization of Freight Networks
Page 14: Regional Prioritization of Freight Networks

FREIGHT MATTERS

Daily - 48.3 million tons of goods worth $46 billion

Annually - 57 tons per person

Annually - 9% of economy is spent on logistics

Page 15: Regional Prioritization of Freight Networks
Page 16: Regional Prioritization of Freight Networks

PLANNING FOR FREIGHT- TODAY

Through Freight

Within State

To-From State

Mostly TrucksTend to be heavier prod-uctsRural-urban flowsUrban-urban flows

More modal bal-anceLargest trading partners are neighborsNeed to move along corridors

All ModesAll cargosDiscretionary routing

Page 17: Regional Prioritization of Freight Networks

WHAT IS A FREIGHT CORRIDOR

• Multijurisdictional network• Multimodal options may exist• Significant traffic generators or traffic volume• Must consider both nodes and networks• Integration of supply chain considerations

(operations)• Economic integration into a regional framework

Page 18: Regional Prioritization of Freight Networks

EXAMPLES OF REGIONAL THINKING

• I-10 Corridor• LATTS I+II• I-70• I-5 Coalition• Border Crossing Coalitions• I-95• I-81• Heartland Intermodal Corridor• Appalachian Regional Commission• DRA, Related Regional Groups doing freight studies• Marine Highway, Truck Division, modal studies

Page 19: Regional Prioritization of Freight Networks

19

NATIONAL FREIGHT NETWORK

• Primary freight network• Designated within one year• Based on inventory of freight volume• 27,000 centerline miles, existing roadways• 3,000 additional miles possible• Redesignation every 10 years

• Other portions of the Interstate System• Critical rural freight corridors.

Page 20: Regional Prioritization of Freight Networks
Page 21: Regional Prioritization of Freight Networks

STATES CAN PARTNER TO IDENTIFY STRATEGIC NEEDS

• A way to share information on system use and traffic• Supply chains, regional trends, performance measures• A mechanism to work with regional agencies • Common message – generates common actions

• An input into State planning• Data and economics• Freight Advisory Group agreement• Improved access to data and models

• A benchmark for collaborating federal requests

Page 22: Regional Prioritization of Freight Networks

Bruce LambertExecutive DirectorInstitute for Trade and Transportation [email protected]

Visit ittsresearch.org for:NewsletterState StatisticsReports and Presentations