reeves and voelker paper

Upload: videoengr

Post on 07-Apr-2018

240 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/6/2019 Reeves and Voelker Paper

    1/23

  • 8/6/2019 Reeves and Voelker Paper

    2/23

  • 8/6/2019 Reeves and Voelker Paper

    3/23

    3

    6.Description of stimuli:

    Message #1 -- Fitness Center ad (male and femaleannouncers)

    Message #2 -- Jewelry store ad (male announcer)Message #3 -- News story about computers (female

    announcer)Message #4 -- Ad for radio station (female announcer)Message #5 -- News story with woman senator as

    featured speakerMessage #6 -- News story about federal budget (female

    newscaster)

    7. Measures of evaluation:

    Eight 8-point scales evaluating main speaker (see questionnaire):

    EffectiveUnderstandablePleasant

    InfluentialBunglingAggravatingIntelligibleAgitated

    IneffectiveConfusingUnpleasant

    UninfluentialSkillfulSoothingUnintelligibleCalm

    Eight 8-point scales evaluating the overall presentation:

    Well producedUnsuccessful

    FastLikableUnpersuasiveRoughCast wellGood

    Poorly producedSuccessful

    SlowUnlikablePersuasiveSmoothCast poorlyBad

  • 8/6/2019 Reeves and Voelker Paper

    4/23

    4

    All evaluation scales (with the exception of slow/fast)summed for overall positive-negative index.

    8. Measures of memory:

    Three multiple-choice memory questions were asked for each ofthe six message segments. All memory questions (18) were thensummed into an overall memory index for all information.

    9. Measures of detection ability:

    Two different types of questions asked viewers whetherthey noticed problems with audio-video synchronization:

    Question 1: "Do you have any comments about the segmentsthat you just viewed?" (No mention of possible synchronizationproblems.)

    Question 2: "Please indicate in which of the segments you thoughtthat the timing between audio and video may have been off. "

    Viewers who mentioned synchronization problems voluntarilyconstituted a third level of detection.

    Summary of Results:

    1. When audio precedes video by 5 video fields, viewers evaluatepeople on television more negatively (e.g. less interesting, moreunpleasant, less influential, more agitated, less successful). Thisdifference is not large, but it is statistically significant. (Figures 1and 2)

    2. Audio-video asynchrony has no effect on viewer's memory for audioinformation. (Figure 3)

    3. Viewers can accurately tell when a television segment is in perfectsynch, and when it is 5 fields out of synch. Viewers

  • 8/6/2019 Reeves and Voelker Paper

    5/23

  • 8/6/2019 Reeves and Voelker Paper

    6/23

  • 8/6/2019 Reeves and Voelker Paper

    7/23

  • 8/6/2019 Reeves and Voelker Paper

    8/23

  • 8/6/2019 Reeves and Voelker Paper

    9/23

  • 8/6/2019 Reeves and Voelker Paper

    10/23

  • 8/6/2019 Reeves and Voelker Paper

    11/23

  • 8/6/2019 Reeves and Voelker Paper

    12/23

  • 8/6/2019 Reeves and Voelker Paper

    13/23

  • 8/6/2019 Reeves and Voelker Paper

    14/23

  • 8/6/2019 Reeves and Voelker Paper

    15/23

  • 8/6/2019 Reeves and Voelker Paper

    16/23

  • 8/6/2019 Reeves and Voelker Paper

    17/23

  • 8/6/2019 Reeves and Voelker Paper

    18/23

  • 8/6/2019 Reeves and Voelker Paper

    19/23

  • 8/6/2019 Reeves and Voelker Paper

    20/23

  • 8/6/2019 Reeves and Voelker Paper

    21/23

  • 8/6/2019 Reeves and Voelker Paper

    22/23

  • 8/6/2019 Reeves and Voelker Paper

    23/23