reduction of threading dislocation
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/13/2019 Reduction of threading dislocation
1/11
Reduction of Threading Dislocations
in GaN-Based Light Emitters
-
8/13/2019 Reduction of threading dislocation
2/11
-
8/13/2019 Reduction of threading dislocation
3/11
Effect of TDs
Formation of a nonradiative recombination center where carriers recombine to
produce heat rather than light [1]. Yellow luminescence (YL) band[2] possibly due to the trapping of impurities or
point defects in dislocations.
Forward [3] and reverse [4] leakage current
In case of LEDs, the abovementioned effects of TDs result in a decrease of
luminescence intensity as well as efficiency.
Fig. 2. CL and TEM images of the same area of a GaN film, showing that there is
decreased luminescence where there are TDs [5]
-
8/13/2019 Reduction of threading dislocation
4/11
Methods of reducing TDs
Heteroepitaxially grown GaN has extremely high density of TDs (108-1012cm-2) [6].
Growing thicker layer:
Interactions between TDs occurs. Dislocation density up to 107cm-2
and below can be achieved by
growing the GaN to a thickness
of ~300 m [7]
Expensive method
Fig. 3. Relationship between thickness and TD
density for GaN films [7].
-
8/13/2019 Reduction of threading dislocation
5/11
Basic GaN growth:
Nitridation of the substrate. Keller et al, reported that nitridation lowered the TDdensity from 21010cm-2 to 4108cm-2 [8].
Growing a nucleation layer (NL) followed by annealing. NL is used to achievebetter coverage of the substrate.
GaN film growth at a higher temperature than the initial NL . By varying this recipe like changing the NL (GaN or AlN ) or the growth conditions
(temperature, reactor pressure, ratio of N to Ga precursor gases etc.) differentother in situ methods are obtained.
Interlayers:
By exposing the GaN to silane and ammonia, a porous SiNx layer is formed.
Many of the TDs are annihilated at or above this layer because, (1) SiNx ILphysically block TDs, (2) 3D growth leading to bending of TDs.
TD density of mid 109 cm-2 to 9107 cm-2 can be achieved with a coalescencethickness of 6m.
Methods of reducing TDs (contd)
-
8/13/2019 Reduction of threading dislocation
6/11
Methods of reducing TDs (contd)
SiNx Interlayers:
Fig. 4. TEM image showing 3D island growth
on a SiNx covered GaN film [9]
Fig. 5. PL showing the Effect of SiNx
Interlayers in reducing TDs [10]
-
8/13/2019 Reduction of threading dislocation
7/11
-
8/13/2019 Reduction of threading dislocation
8/11
Methods of reducing TDs (contd)
Two step ELO:
Formation of triangular pyramidal stripes by changing growth condition.
Pyramidal facets induce the TDs to bend over by 90 into the (0001) basal plane .
The growth conditions are then altered to favor lateral growth, achieving
coalescence.
The TD bending mechanism greatly decreases the dislocation density in the
coherent region as the bent-over dislocations meet and annihilate
With this technique, the average density of TDs over the entire surface has been
lowered to 1.7107 cm-2. However, in the regions between the coalescenceboundaries, a TD density of 5106cm-2has been achieved [7].
Fig. 7. Two-step ELO [7]
-
8/13/2019 Reduction of threading dislocation
9/11
Conclusion
There are some other methods like transition metal nitride ILs (TiN/ ScN), maskless
ELO, pandeoepitaxy etc used to reduce TDs .
Both in situ and ex situ methods of TDs reduction yield an improvement in
material quality.
In-situ methods are advantageous because of their shorter growth times and
easier scalability for manufacturing.
ELO techniques have been successful in reducing TD density to a great extent, but
the involved lithography steps make this method less attractive.
With further work on these reduction methods, GaN films with homogeneously
low TD densities may be produced, leading to the production of high efficiency
light emitters.
-
8/13/2019 Reduction of threading dislocation
10/11
Thank You
-
8/13/2019 Reduction of threading dislocation
11/11
[1] H. Morko, Handbook of Nitride Semiconductors and Devices, Volume1, Chapter 4. [2] F. A. Ponce et al,Appl. Phys. Lett., 1996, 68, (1), 57-59.
[3] S. W. Lee et al,Appl. Phys. Lett., 2006, 89, 132117.
[4] J. C. Moore et al,Appl. Phys. Lett., 2007, 90, 011913.
[5] T. Sugahara et al,Jpn J. Appl. Phys., 1998, 37, L398-L400.
[6] S. Nakamura, Science, 1998, 281, 956-961.
[7] P. Gibart, Rep. Prog. Phys., 2004, 67, 667-715.
[8] S. Keller et al,Appl. Phys. Lett.,1996, 68, (11), 1525-1527.
[9] M. J. Kappers et al,J. Cryst. Growth, 2007, 300, 70-74.
[10] S. E. Park et al,J. Cryst. Growth, 2003, 249, 487-491.
References