redefining investment reconciliationd1pvbs8relied5.cloudfront.net/resources/redefining...security...
TRANSCRIPT
REDEFINING INVESTMENT
RECONCILIATIONTHE CLEARWATER WAY
“Having our college-degreed accountants perform data entry
functions was not optimal. Outsourcing reconciliation to
Clearwater solved this issue.”
Belana ColquittManager of Investment Accounting
Fidelity National Financial
Reconciliation |clearwateranalytics.com 1
or insurers, accurate and timely data is a fundamental
requirement for investment accounting and reporting. In order to
ensure investment data is accurate and timely, reconciliation is a
critical step in confirming that accounting values are correct before
they are included in financial statements and reports. And while some
reconciliation is better than none, not all reconciliation processes are
created equal. The majority of them don’t go far enough to ensure
investment accounting data is accurate and available in a timely manner.
Whether an insurer relies on their own spreadsheets, or on a
solution provider to assist with investment accounting and
reporting, there are five key reasons why legacy reconciliation
does not deliver accurate and timely investment data—and five
key reasons why Clearwater Analytics’ reconciliation does.
F
| Reconciliation clearwateranalytics.com2
1. Error-Prone Manual Data Entry
Most solutions, whether installed or outsourced,
are still based on manual activity behind the scenes.
Many solutions require insurers or outsourced providers to
manually enter cash, position, and transaction data from their
custody banks or asset managers into spreadsheets or investment
accounting systems. Manually entering data is time consuming and
expensive. Accountants were not hired as, nor want to become, data
processors. Furthermore, manual processes leave room for error,
and the consequences of bad data can be severe. For example, what
starts as a seemingly innocuous miscalculated coupon payment
entered into your accounting system can result in incorrect balance
sheet values for each subsequent report that contains the error. It
can be a time-consuming and expensive exercise to hunt down
the source and correct it. Inefficient processes and solutions tie
up accountants with manual tasks and time-consuming error
resolution, when they should be focused on more important,
strategic projects.
2. Incomplete Security Master Information
The core cash, transaction, and position data that
insurers receive from custodians and asset managers is insufficient
for generating complete accounting information and financial
statements. That’s why many insurers utilize independent data
sources to enrich this core transactional data and fill in missing
data points such as income, yield, price/market value, factors, etc.
However, many insurers only rely on one or two data sources.
In fact, according to the recent Insurance Investment Benchmark
Survey conducted by Clearwater Analytics, insurers only rely on
an average of 1.4 data sources for this critical data.1 And not all
data providers are created equal. For example, some sources are
great for issuer data, while others are good for credit ratings. Still
others are good for broad coverage over a single security class. If
your portfolio has a wide range of security types, but you’re only
relying on a few providers for your security master, you may be
using an incorrect or incomplete source. As a result, inaccurate
or incomplete data can unknowingly end up in your accounting
records. Then when the reconciliation begins, the values being
reconciled back to the custodian are based off of inaccurate security
master and market data.
1 Clearwater Insurance Investment Benchmark Survey Report, July 21, 2014
5 Key Reasons Why They Fall Short
Legacy Reconciliation Processes
Reconciliation |clearwateranalytics.com 3
3. Infrequent Data Processing
While most custody banks post transactions and
holdings activity at the end of every trading day,
depending on the size and complexity of the portfolio, it’s rare
for most insurers to process this data on a daily basis into their
accounting systems. In fact, many wait until the end of the month to
gather and enter this data. And since they are processing data only
once per month, many companies skip the critical step of validating
the data prior to entering it into their investment accounting
system. When portfolio information is accessed and verified from
the bank infrequently, you don’t know the status of the portfolio in
the intervening periods. Moreover, when the information “batches”
are larger, there’s a higher likelihood of data entry errors, especially
if you or your outsourced provider are keying in data manually.
4. The Dreaded Monthly Reconciliation Process
Even if an insurer receives investment data every
day, that doesn’t mean it’s accurate. There’s a vast
difference between processing data (entering the values into the
system) and reconciling data (verifying that the values are correct).
Insurers who incorporate investment data from their transaction
sources via daily feeds into their accounting systems usually wait
until the end of the month for this data to be reconciled, and for
exceptions to be resolved. In fact, 67% of insurers report that
they only validate their sources on a monthly basis.1 This means
transactions are entered less often and balances are verified less
frequently. Data must also be reconciled in larger “batches,” which
increases the likelihood for error, and can delay the month-end
reporting process. And when reconciliation occurs just once a
month, typically there is only time to reconcile basic data points
such as cash, positions, and transactions, while other data that is
critical to your financial statements goes unchecked.
5. Cumbersome Exception Tracking and Resolution
Regardless of whether an insurer uses an installed
or outsourced investment accounting provider,
exceptions and data discrepancies are typically tracked manually
in separate spreadsheets or databases, and often require insurers
to investigate these exceptions on their own. If you’re tracking and
resolving exceptions on your own, you’re adding an unnecessary
burden on your already overloaded accounting and investment
teams. It’s up to you to consult third-party sources, or work with
a custody bank to identify and correct any values in your system.
Furthermore, if you’re reliant on an outsourced party to track and
resolve exceptions, chances are they’re still being tracked manually
behind the scenes, which means only the most egregious or
noticeable errors are investigated. As a result, errors can still slip
through the cracks and into your financial statements.
Manually entering data is time consuming and expensive. Accountants were not hired as,
nor want to become, data processors.
| Reconciliation clearwateranalytics.com4
1. Automated Data Aggregation
Clearwater has transformed a legacy process—based
on the manual transposition of investment data
from the custody source to a separate spreadsheet or investment
accounting software—into an automated process that is efficient
and effortless. Whether a company’s assets are held in custody
accounts with major banks, or in state deposits, Clearwater
reaches out to hundreds of separate financial institutions daily and
automatically extracts holdings data. With no manual processes,
errors caused by mis-keying information are eliminated and
your investment accounting teams are freed up to work on other
important tasks.
2. Complete, Enriched Security Master File
Clearwater incorporates security characteristics and
market data from all leading providers to build a complete security
master. Our detailed data validation, enrichment, and reconciliation
solution compares your investment data against all of these sources
and identifies the best comparative data for each individual security.
The result is data not from a single source, but from the best
source. Furthermore, we build a complete profile of the data you
need for accounting purposes so that your data contains more than
just cash, position, and transaction-level detail; it’s fully formed,
analyzed extensively, and contains all the data necessary for your
core accounting and reporting needs. Plus, it has additional data
points and characteristics that enable you to conduct further
detailed analysis.
3. Daily Data Processing
The Clearwater solution processes data daily.
Once we’ve connected with all of your safekeeping
institutions, we process transactions and holdings activity into the
system every single day. Not only do you gain the benefit of up-to-
date, accurate data, you have access to it daily. You get what you
need for core accounting purposes, including income, amortization,
yield, position, market value, factors, corporate actions, late
payments, general ledger, and more. It’s like having month-end data
and month-end reporting every day of the month, and you always
know the exact status of your portfolio.
5 Key Reasons Why It Is Superior
Clearwater’s Reconciliation Process
Reconciliation |clearwateranalytics.com 5
Clearwater has transformed a legacy process into an automated one that is
efficient and effortless.
4. Complete, Detailed, and Daily Reconciliation
Clearwater employs a robust, automated, system-to-
custody reconciliation process that occurs daily. Each business day,
Clearwater takes data pulled from custody banks and provides an
initial arithmetic check on the data. Using data characteristics from
third-party sources, Clearwater then independently reconstructs the
portfolio composition to predict portfolio activity, and reconciles
cash, position, and transaction information back to the custody
bank. No other reconciliation process goes to this level of depth
and detail.
Every day, the Clearwater solution automatically checks
and reconciles:
ü Custody positions and cash balances
ü Custody transactions
ü Data consistency, including missing ratings and security
characteristics (e.g., country of domicile, coupon rates,
ultimate parent, NAIC classification codes, etc.)
ü Missing pricing, market value reconciliation, prior day
market price tolerance, and market yield comparisons
ü Income values between Clearwater, custody, and third-party
calculated amounts; coupon rate accuracy, and day count
method accuracy
ü Accounting assumptions, such as purchase yield versus
current yield, and constant yield analysis versus straight
line amortization
ü And much more…
5. Streamlined, Painless Exception Resolution
Clearwater’s Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) technology
streamlines the exception resolution process and ensures that it is
painless —as evidenced by our 98% customer satisfaction rating.
After Clearwater’s proprietary software automatically reconciles all
positions and transactions in every portfolio, exceptions that the
system cannot reconcile are flagged and are individually investigated
by accounting experts dedicated to your account. Clearwater
identifies the true issues, not the numerous false positives that
can hinder your access to accurate and timely investment data.
Clearwater removes the noise, and lets you focus on what really
matters. Exceptions are resolved quickly and accurately, and you
gain more time to devote to more important tasks.
| Reconciliation clearwateranalytics.com6
Problem Implication
1. Error-Prone
Manual
Data Entry
Most solutions—whether in-house or outsourced—
are still based on the manual entry of cash, position,
and transaction data from custody banks into
spreadsheets or investment accounting systems.
Manual data entry is prone to error, and
errors can easily propagate downstream
into financial statements and reports.
2. Incomplete
Security Master
Information
Insurers rely on independent data sources to
enrich data received from custodians and asset
managers. Yet they often only use one or two
sources, severely limiting their ability to generate
complete and accurate security master data.
Relying on a limited number of independent
data providers means inaccurate or incomplete
data has the potential to end up in not only the
security master file, but the investment book
of record and financial statements as well.
3. Infrequent
or Batch Data
Processing
Most insurers only process data monthly, and
often skip the critical task of validating the data.
Because up-to-date data isn’t in your system, you don’t
know the true status of your portfolio in the middle of
month. Plus, when you do wait, there’s a higher volume
of data to process, which increases the chances for error.
4. The Dreaded
Monthly
Reconciliation
Process
Even if insurers receive investment data
every day, that does not mean the data is
accurate. There’s a big difference between just
processing data and actually reconciling it.
When the process for reconciling investment data
occurs at the end of the month, you increase the
possibility of introducing bad data while slowing
the time it takes to identify and resolve breaks.
5. Cumbersome
Exception
Tracking and
Resolution
Regardless of whether you use an installed or
outsourced investment accounting provider,
exceptions are typically tracked and resolved
manually in separate spreadsheets or databases.
Identifying, tracking, and resolving exceptions is still
a manual, painstaking process that’s prone to error.
Legacy Reconciliation Processes
A Side-by-Side Comparison
Reconciliation |clearwateranalytics.com 7
Solution Benefit
1. Automated Data
Aggregation
Clearwater automatically aggregates your
investment data, transforming a traditionally
manual process into one that is effortless.
Errors are reduced and your investment
accounting teams are freed up to
work on other vital tasks.
2. Complete,
Enriched
Security
Master File
Clearwater’s data validation, enrichment, and
reconciliation solution compares your data against
multiple sources to identify the best comparative
data for each individual security in your portfolio.
Your data contains more than just cash,
position, and transaction details. It
includes the data you need for your core
accounting and reporting needs.
3. Daily Data
Processing
With Clearwater, your data is automatically
entered into the accounting system every day.
You know the exact status of
your portfolio every day.
4. Complete,
Detailed,
and Daily
Reconciliation
Each day, Clearwater performs an initial arithmetic check
on custody data. Using data characteristics from third-party
data sources, Clearwater then independently reconstructs
the portfolio composition and reconciles cash, position,
and transaction information back to the custody bank.
Fully reconciled, accurate data is
available each and every day.
5. Streamlined
and Painless
Exception
Resolution
Clearwater’s exception resolution process is automated
and painless. What investment data the system does
not automatically reconcile is investigated and resolved
by a dedicated client services team on your behalf.
Your investment accounting teams no
longer have to labor through the painful
exception resolution process, and are
freed up to work on other activities.
The Reconciliation Process
Clearwater removes the noise, and lets you focus on
what really matters.
| Reconciliation clearwateranalytics.com8
Automated Reconciliation Delivers Accurate and Timely Investment Data
Clearwater Analytics has recognized the problems inherent in
traditional reconciliation processes and has developed a superior
solution. Clearwater’s web-based investment accounting and reporting
solution leverages the power of technology and automation, deep
industry knowledge, and access to the very best data sources to create
a daily, detailed, and automated reconciliation process that provides
insurers with accurate and timely investment data every single day.
When it comes to reconciliation, there’s
the legacy way, and then there’s
THE CLEARWATER WAY
©2014 Clearwater Analytics All rights reserved. This material is for informational purposes only. Clearwater makes no warranties, express or implied, in this summary. All technologies described herein are either registered trademarks or trademarks of their respective owners in the United States and/or other countries.09.2014
INQUIRIES208.901.7787 [email protected] [email protected]
WORLDWIDE OFFICESBoise, Idaho New York, New York Edinburgh, U.K.