qf notes
DESCRIPTION
ma3269TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: QF notes](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081808/563db990550346aa9a9e8494/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Mathematical Finance
MA3269
Ryan Heng
November 15, 2014
![Page 2: QF notes](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081808/563db990550346aa9a9e8494/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Chapter 1
Expected Utility
1.1 Definitions
Discrete X
EU(X + w0) =
n∑i=1
piU(xi + w0)
Continuous X
EU(X + w0) =
∫ b
a
f(x)U(x+ w0) dx
1.2 Utility function
A utility function U is strictly increasing. So,
U(x) > U(y), ∀x > y
andU(x) = U(y) =⇒ x = y .
U is concave (strictly concave) if
U(αx+ (1− α)y) ≥ (>) αU(x) + (1− α)U(y)
and convex (strictly convex) if
U(αx+ (1− α)y) ≤ (<) αU(x) + (1− α)U(y) .
If U is strictly concave (e.g. U(x) =√x), the individual is risk averse. Also,
U ′′ < 0, and by Jensen’s Inequality,
E(U(X)) < U(E(X)) .
1
![Page 3: QF notes](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081808/563db990550346aa9a9e8494/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
1.3 Certainty Equivalent
The certainty equivalent is c = CE(X;U), where
U(c) = E(U(w0 +X)) .
The individual is indifferent between investing in X and having a final wealthof c.
1.4 Risk Premium
The risk premium is r = RP(X;U), where
U(w0 − r) = E(U(w0 +X)) .
Clearly, r = w0 − c.
1.5 Investment decision
Invest EU(X + wo) > U(w0) c > w0 r < 0Avoid EU(X + wo) < U(w0) c < w0 r > 0Indifferent EU(X + wo) = U(w0) c = w0 r = 0
1.6 Arrow-Pratt Risk Aversion
The ARA of a utility function U is
UARA = −U′′
U ′= −(lnu′)′ .
A risk averse individual has UARA > 0. If ∀w, UARA > VARA, we say that U isglobally more risk averse than V. This is true if and only if there is an increasingand strictly concave function g such that
U(w) = g(V (w)) .
1.7 Positive affine transformation
V is a positive affine transformation of U if
V = αU + β, ∀α > 0, β ∈ R .
Let V be a positive affine transformation of U. Then U is concave (convex) ifand only if V is concave (convex). Thus they have the same certainty equivalentand make the same investment decisions. Also, UARA = VARA if and only if Uand V are positive transformations of each other.
1.8 Portfolio selection
An individual will choose to invest a portion of his initial wealth in a riskyinvestment X that has a random rate of return, r, so as to maximise
E(U(W )) = E(U(w0(1 + αr))), α ∈ [0, 1] .
2
![Page 4: QF notes](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081808/563db990550346aa9a9e8494/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Chapter 2
Markowitz’s PortfolioTheory & CAPM
2.1 Definitions
cov(ri, rj) = σij , cov(rp, rq) = wTpCwq
corr(ri, rj) = ρij =σijσiσj
µp =
n∑i=1
wiµi = µTw = wTµ
σ2p =
n∑i=1
n∑j=1
wiwjσij = wTCw
2.2 Useful identities
∂
∂wi(σ2p) = 2
n∑j=1
wjσij ,∂
∂w(wTCw) = 2Cw
∂
∂w(wT v) = v, ∀v
cov(rp, rg) =1
a
2.3 Minimum-variance frontier
σ2 =a(µ− b
a )2 + (c− b2
a )
ac− b2(a bb c
)=
(1TC−11 1TC−1µ1TC−1µ µTC−1µ
)wg =
C−11
1TC−11, σg =
1√a, µg =
b
a
3
![Page 5: QF notes](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081808/563db990550346aa9a9e8494/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
2.4 Two Fund Theorem
Let
w1 = wg =C−11
1TC−11and w2 =
C−1µ
1TC−1µ.
If b = 1TC−1µ > 0, then Fund 2 is efficient. So, any portfolio αw1+(1−α)w2,where α < 1, is efficient.
2.5 One Fund Theorem
If portfolio p lies on the CML, then µp = αrm + (1− α)rf , for some α > 0. So,
α =µp − rfrm − rf
= βp, σp = ασm .
wp =(µp − rf )C−1(µ− rf1)
(µ− rf1)TC−1(µ− rf1)=
(µp − rf )C−1(µ− rf1)
c− 2brf + ar2f
rf < µg =b
a
wtan =C−1(µ− rf1)
b− rfa
µtan =c− rfbb− rfa
σ2tan =
c− 2rfb+ ar2f(b− rfa)2
σ =|µ− rf |√
c− 2brf + ar2f
(CML), µp =µtan − rfσtan
σp + rf (efficient CML)
SRp =µp − rfσp
2.6 Capital Asset Pricing Model
We take the market portfolio wm to be wtan. So, the CML can be written as
µp − rf =σpσm
(µm − rf ) .
µp−rf is the risk premium of portfolio p. In general, CAPM holds for any asseti or porfolio p.
µi − rf =σimσ2m
(µm − rf ) = βi(µm − rf ), rf =µi − βiµm
1− βi
µp − rf =σpmσ2m
(µm − rf ) = βp(µm − rf )
βp =
n∑i=1
wiβi = wTβ, σpm = cov(
n∑i=1
wiri, rm)
4
![Page 6: QF notes](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081808/563db990550346aa9a9e8494/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Chapter 3
European Option Theory
3.1 Bounds on Option Prices
max{0, S0 −Ke−rT } ≤ C ≤ S0
max{0,Ke−rT − S0} ≤ P ≤ Ke−rT
Let K2 > K1. Then,C(K2) ≤ C(K1)
C(K2)− C(K1) ≤ e−rT (K2 −K1)
P (K2) ≥ P (K1)
P (K2)− P (K1) ≤ e−rT (K2 −K1)
Let 0 < K1 < K2. P (K) is convex in K. So,
P (αK1 + (1− α)K2) ≤ αP (K1) + (1− α)P (K2), ∀α ∈ (0, 1)
3.2 Put-Call Parity
C +Ke−rT = P + S0
3.3 Binomial Option Pricing
The replicating portfolio consists of ∆ units of shares and $B of risk-free asset.
∆ =Fu1 − F d1S0(u− d)
, B =u · F d1 − d · Fu1er·δt(u− d)
F0 = ∆ · S0 +B = e−r·δt(qFu1 + (1− q)F d1 )
q =er·δt − du− d
(single period t)
F0 = e−2r·δt(q2Fuu2 + 2q(1− q)Fud2 + (1− q)2F dd2 ) (path independent)
5