public document pack corporate services
TRANSCRIPT
CORPORATE SERVICES
LLiinnddaa FFiisshheerr
DDeeppuuttyy CChhiieeff EExxeeccuuttiivvee
GOVERNANCE AND COMMITTEE SERVICES TEAM Number One Riverside, Smith Street, Rochdale, OL16 1XU DX22831 ROCHDALE Tel: (01706) 647474 Fax: (01706) 924705 Website: www.rochdale.gov.uk
To: All Members of the Overview and Scrutiny Committee
Enquiries to: Peter Thompson e-mail: [email protected] Extension: 4715 Date: 7th October 2013
Dear Councillor OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY COMMITTEE Please find set out details of an additional item of business to be conducted at the Overview and Scrutiny Committee this Thursday, 10th October. This item - Rochdale Local Education Partnership (inspired spaces) Quarterly Review: April - June 2013, will form agenda item 6(a)
Yours Faithfully
Linda Fisher Deputy Chief Executive Overview and Scrutiny Committee Membership 2013/14 Councillor Boriss Councillor Clegg (Vice Chair) Councillor Susan Emmott Councillor Farnell Councillor Greenall Councillor Holly (Chair) Councillor Kelly Councillor Linden Councillor O’Rourke Councillor Martin Rodgers Councillor Wazir
Public Document Pack
ROCHDALE METROPOLITAN BOROUGH COUNCIL
OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY COMMITTEE
Thursday, 10 October 2013 at 6.15 pm
Hollingworth (Room 108ABC), First Floor, Number One Riverside, Smith Street, Rochdale, OL16 1XU
A G E N D A
Apologies for Absence
(a) Rochdale Local Education Partnership (inspiredspaces) Quarterly Review : April - June 2013
Subject: Rochdale Local Education Partnership (inspiredspaces) Quarterly Review : April – June 2013 (Q1)
Status: For Publication
Report to: Overview & Scrutiny Committee
Date: 4th October 2013
Report of: General Manager of inspiredspaces Rochdale Author: Claire Butler
Author Email: [email protected] Tel: 01706 751166
Cabinet Member: Councillor Donna Martin Portfolio Holder for Children, Schools & Families
Comments from Statutory Officers:
Section 151 Officer x Monitoring Officer x
Key Decision: No
1. PURPOSE OF REPORT
1.1 To summarise the quarterly performance of the inspiredspaces Rochdale Local Education Partnership (LEP) for the reporting period April to June 2013.
2. RECOMMENDATIONS
2.1 The Overview & Scrutiny Committee be invited to review the attached report. 3. BACKGROUND
3.1 The LEP is a 10-year strategic partnership which was established in January 2010. The partnership comprises Rochdale MBC, BSFi and Carillion.
3.2 The LEP’s primary focus is the delivery of Rochdale’s Building Schools for the
Future programme, which comprises the design, construction and operation of 13 secondary schools across the borough. The key performance indicators outlined in the attached report relate to this programme of work.
Alternatives considered Not applicable. Consultation proposed/undertaken Not applicable.
4. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS 4.1 None.
Agenda Item 6a
Page 3
5. LEGAL IMPLICATIONS
5.1 None.
6. PERSONNEL IMPLICATIONS
6.1 None.
7. CORPORATE PRIORITIES
7.1 The Committee has a duty to oversee and scrunitise the performance of the borough’s strategic partners.
8. RISK ASSESSMENT IMPLICATIONS
8.1 There are no specific risk issues for members to consider arising from this report.
9. EQUALITIES IMPACTS
9.1 Workforce Equality Impacts Assessment
There are no significant workforce equality issues arising from this report. 9.2 Equality/Community Impact Assessments
There are no significant equality/community issues arising from this report.
Background Papers
There are no background papers
Page 4
Page 1 of 5
inspiredspaces Rochdale Ltd
Performance Report
Q1 (Apr – Jun) 2013
Confidential : For internal use only
Prepared By: Claire Butler
4th October 2013
Page 5
Page 2 of 5
1. Executive Summary
The new Kingsway Park High School was completed on 31st May 2013 Good construction progress continued to be made across all live construction sites, with
a number of phase handovers at Holy Family RC & CE College, Middleton TechnologySchool and Matthew Moss.
As at 30 June 2013, the Rochdale BSF programme had achieved a full 12 months withno lost-time accidents and 16 months RIDDOR-free. This was an excellent achievementbearing in mind that this covered 11 different construction sites and a considerablenumber of man hours worked.
2 sites were presented with National Bronze Awards under the Considerate ConstructorsScheme (Holy Family, Middleton Tech).
2. Programme Overview
During Q1 2013 the new Kingsway Park High School was completed. There were also anumber of further construction phase completions as summarised below.
Phase Plannedcompletion date
Actual completiondate
Comments
Kingsway Park HighSchool
31st May 2013 31st May 2013 Works completed onprogramme
Holy Family Phase 7 :Refurbishment ofboulevard and SEN
15th April 2013 15th April 2013 Revised completiondates agreed with theschool and localauthority
Holy Family Phase 8 :New build teachingblock
29th April 2013 29th April 2013 Revised completiondates agreed with theschool and localauthority
Matthew Moss Phase 10: Seed maturation period
30th April 2013 30th April 2013 Works completed onprogramme
Middleton Tech Phase 2: Main general teachingblock (refurb)
12th July 2013 7th May 2013 Works completed 10weeks ahead ofprogramme
As at the end of June 2013, there were five secondary school sites in construction (Holy FamilyRC & CE College; Middleton Technology School; Falinge Park High School; Wardle HighSchool and St Cuthbert’s RC High School). Post-completion and contract variation works werealso ongoing at Brownhill (Heights Lane site) and Kingsway Park High School.
Good progress is also being made with 12-month defect inspections at the completed schemes,with any identified defects being addressed by the Aftercare team.
Construction quality (KPI 2.5)
We have developed the following scoring criteria in conjunction with RMBC, which will be usedto measure the quality of completed work phases going forward:
Quality score Description Examples of defects classification
Failure of a structural member resulting in areasunavailable to use
0 – 3 Major Defects
Mains power, services outage or major pipe leak resulting
Page 6
Page 3 of 5
in areas unavailable to use
Fire in mechanical / electrical equipment due to equipmentfault
Failure of the fire alarm system resulting in large areaswithout protection
Failure of ICT system throughout the school
Note : where defects are as for category 5 – 6, cumulative effect or prolonged duration couldcause to move down a category
Water penetration through windows, doors or roof resultingin leaks or drips
Failures in ironmongery fittings (e.g. loose handles, faultylocks and bolts, hinges) which affects the operation ofcritical doors or windows (e.g. fire doors)
Heating faults resulting in excessive heat or cold withinrooms for a sustained period of time
Minor faults resulting in intermittent false alarms affectinglife safety systems (e.g. fire or security systems)
5 – 6 Some withimpact onclient
Failure of ICT system in one area of the school
Note : where defects are as for category 8 – 9, cumulative effect or prolonged duration couldcause to move down a category
Failure of isolated electrical fittings – e.g. light switch,power socket, data point
Local failure of a floor finish, e.g. debonding of vinylfloor/skirting, loose carpet tile, uneven ashphalt surface orhard landscaping
Local staining to ceiling finish, e.g. stained ceiling tile
Movement cracks affecting wall finishes
Failed parts to user equipment, e.g. soap dispenser, WC,taps, hand driers, PA system, loose furniture items
Noise from localised plant or equipment
Deterioration of finished surface quality, e.g. paint andvarnish blemish, loose tiles, external render etc.
8 – 9 Some defectsbut notsignificant
Failure of ICT device (e.g. interactive whiteboard) causingdisruption to teaching and learning in one room
10 Defect free
3. Performance Overview
The LEP’s key performance indicators (KPIs) are set out in the Strategic Partnering Agreement.A full summary of the LEP’s performance against these KPIs for Q1 (Apr – Jun) 2013 is set outat Appendix 1, however some key points are highlighted below:
Curriculum and careers support
During Q1 we provided 10 adult and 12 student work experience placements and 419 hours ofcombined careers and wider curriculum support to schools and the local authority, bringing ourcumulative total to 86 work placements and 4,061 hours of careers and curriculum supportrespectively.
Health & Safety
Page 7
Page 4 of 5
There were no reportable accidents occurred during the reporting period. 2 schemes receivedConsiderate Constructors Scheme monitoring visits, achieving the following scores (each scoreis out of a maximum 50):
Midd Tech – 44Holy Family - 43
We believe that these scores remain amongst the highest nationally under the new CCS scoringregime.
As at the end of June, the Rochdale BSF programme had achieved a full 12 months with no“lost-time” incidents and 16 months RIDDOR-free. The LEP issued letters to all the site teamsto congratulate them on this outstanding achievement.
Supporting the local economy
During Q1 2013, £0.31million was spent within the Rochdale borough postcode area. A total£11.46m had been spent by the end of June 2013, representing 12.8% of the total constructionpackage spend by value.
Supporting community use of schools
We requested information from the completed mainstream schools (Hollingworth Academy,Siddal Moor Sports College, Matthew Moss High School, Cardinal Langley RC High School) toassess the level to which they believe that the facilities delivered through the BSF programmehave increased community use within school. The responses received from these schoolsindicate that lettings are only just getting back to normal (pre-BSF) levels following theconstruction period, therefore we are proposing to keep this closely monitored for the next 12-month period.
4. Added Value
Highlights of Q1 2013 included:
Holy FamilyThe site team supported a work experience and design competition for 4 Hopwood Hall Collegestudents, a 2-week work experience placement for a student from Redwood School, a workexperience placement for a student from Kingsway Park
Middleton TechThe site team supported a graduate student with the design of an outdoor play area for the“Twinkle Toes” nursery which is adjacent to the site. Materials and resource were donated byCarillion for this mini-project
WardleThe site team provided work experience for 4 Hopwood Hall College students and 3undergraduates from Leeds University, as well as a work experience placement for a Year 10Kingsway School placement. Wardle High students visited the Carillion Training Servicestraining centre in Salford to get an understanding of masonry and joinery skills.
St Cuthbert’s
Page 8
Page 5 of 5
Carillion and the LEP supported a series of workshops for Year 4 primary school students,involving a carousel of activities relating to the new build. Staff from the LEP team and Carillionsite teams delivered the workshop activities over 4 days.
APPENDIX 1 : KPI SUMMARYSee separate report attached
Page 9
Rochdale
LE
P -
KP
I S
um
mary
Report
Q1
Page 1
of
9
Ro
ch
da
le B
SF
: L
EP
Ke
y P
erf
orm
an
ce
In
dic
ato
rs
Su
mm
ary
Re
po
rtQ
1 (
AP
R –
JU
N 2
01
3)
KE
Y : Pe
rio
d S
tatu
sD
escri
pti
on
RT
arg
et
no
t a
ch
ieved
AW
ork
in p
rog
ress
GT
arg
et
ach
ieve
d
Hea
din
gK
PI O
ve
rvie
wQ
1 2
01
3P
eri
od
Sta
tus
Ch
an
ge
KP
I 1
.1 –
Co
mp
lete
G-
KP
I 1
.2 –
Co
mp
lete
G-
To
pro
du
ce h
igh
qu
ality
pro
po
sa
ls t
hat
mee
t th
ere
qu
irem
en
ts o
f th
e lo
ca
l au
tho
rity
an
d o
ther
sta
ke
ho
lde
rs
KP
I 1
.1 :
Qua
lity o
f N
ew
Pro
ject S
tage
1 p
ropo
sa
ls,
me
asu
red
by the
pe
rcen
tage
of
Sta
ge
1 n
ew
pro
ject
pro
po
sa
ls a
pp
rove
d b
y the
Lo
ca
l A
uth
ority
in a
ccord
an
cew
ith
th
e S
PA
in
an
y r
olli
ng
th
ree
yea
r pe
rio
d
KP
I 1
.2 :
Qua
lity o
f N
ew
Pro
ject S
tage
2 p
ropo
sa
ls,
me
asu
red
by the
pe
rcen
tage
of
Sta
ge
2 n
ew
pro
ject
pro
po
sa
ls a
pp
rove
d b
y the
Lo
ca
l A
uth
ority
in a
ccord
an
cew
ith
th
e S
PA
in
an
y r
olli
ng
th
ree
yea
r pe
rio
d
KP
I 1
.3 :
Satisf
action
with
pa
rtne
rin
g s
erv
ices,
mea
su
red
by
the
ave
rage
pe
rce
nta
ge
sco
re o
f a
nn
ua
l su
rve
ys
KP
I 1
.3 –
me
asu
red
an
nu
ally
A-
To
ac
hie
ve a
hig
h q
uality
of
desig
n i
n a
ll B
SF
sch
oo
ls;
To
cre
ate
an
d m
ain
tain
su
sta
inab
le s
ch
oo
l b
uild
ing
s,
an
d t
o m
inim
ise c
on
str
ucti
on
waste
; T
o m
inim
ise
dis
rup
tio
n o
f ex
isti
ng
ed
uca
tio
nal
serv
ice
s in
sc
ho
ols
KP
I 2
.1 –
fu
rth
er
su
rve
ys to
be
issue
dto
sch
oo
ls a
fte
r O
cto
be
r ha
lf t
erm
201
3A
-
Page 10
Rochdale
LE
P -
KP
I S
um
mary
Report
Q1
Page 2
of
9
KP
I 2
.2.1
– n
o c
ond
itio
n d
eficie
ncie
s
ide
ntified
in
co
mp
lete
d p
ha
se
sG
KP
I 2
.2.2
– n
o s
uitab
ility
sh
ort
falls
ide
ntified
in
co
mp
lete
d p
ha
se
sG
KP
I 2
.2.3
– th
e lo
ca
l au
tho
rity
ha
s
co
nfirm
ed
th
at
ne
w n
et cap
acity
asse
ssm
en
ts a
re to
be
ca
rrie
d o
ut
upo
n c
om
ple
tion
of e
ach
pro
ject to
co
nfirm
th
e d
esig
n a
ch
ieve
s the
pla
nn
ed
sp
ace
s
A
KP
I 2
.3 –
no
acce
ssib
ility
issu
es
ide
ntified
in
co
mp
lete
d p
ha
se
s (
as
co
nfirm
ed
by th
e c
he
cks a
nd
asse
ssm
en
ts c
arr
ied
ou
t b
y the
lo
ca
la
uth
ori
ty’s
te
ch
nic
al ad
vis
ers
on
th
ed
esig
n p
rop
osa
ls,
the
che
cks a
nd
insp
ection
s c
arr
ied
ou
t b
y the
Ind
epe
nd
en
t C
ert
ifie
r d
uring
th
eco
nstr
uction
pro
ce
ss a
nd
th
ece
rtific
atio
n o
f th
e p
roje
cts
on
co
mp
letio
n b
y B
uild
ing
Con
tro
lo
ffic
ers
)
G
KP
I 2
.5 –
all
wo
rk p
ha
se
s to
be
mo
nito
red
ag
ain
st th
e s
co
ring
crite
ria
se
t o
ut
in t
he
ma
in r
ep
ort
A-
receiv
ing
BS
F i
nvestm
en
t
KP
I 2
.1 :
Clie
nt
sa
tisf
actio
n o
f D
esig
n Q
ua
lity,
mea
su
red
by
the
ave
rage
pe
rce
nta
ge
ach
ieved
acro
ss a
ll co
mp
lete
dsch
oo
ls in
the
po
st-
occup
an
cy D
QI fo
r S
ch
oo
ls
KP
I 2
.2 :
Te
st of
con
ditio
ns,
su
itab
ility
, an
d s
uff
icie
ncy o
fsch
oo
ls a
nd
acce
ss, m
easu
red
by th
e p
erc
enta
ge
of
all
sch
oo
ls th
at ha
ve:
(a)
a C
on
ditio
n a
sse
ssm
en
t of
at
lea
st
'A' f
or
ne
w b
uild
ing
sa
nd
‘B
’ fo
r re
furb
ish
me
nts
fo
r a
ll e
lem
en
ts o
f a
ll b
uild
ing
s;
(b)
a s
atisf
acto
ry S
uitab
ility
asse
ssm
en
t (s
uch
tha
t th
ere
are
no
sh
ort
falls
in
te
ach
ing
spa
ce
s, a
ny d
ire
ct im
pa
cts
on
edu
ca
tion
are
me
asu
red
as c
ate
go
ry D
, an
d a
ny h
ea
lth
an
dsafe
ty/s
ecu
rity
pro
ble
ms a
re lo
w);
an
d
(c)
a s
atisfa
cto
ry S
uff
icie
ncy a
sse
ssm
en
t (s
uch
tha
t th
en
um
be
r of
pu
pil
pla
ce
s m
ea
su
red
by the
ne
t cap
acity is a
tle
ast th
at
requ
ire
d in
th
e S
tage
1 a
nd
the
net
bu
ildin
g a
rea
sa
re a
t le
ast th
at
reco
mm
en
de
d b
y B
B9
8 fo
r th
e c
ap
acity)
KP
I 2
.3 :
Sch
oo
l a
cce
ssib
ility
, m
ea
su
red
by th
e p
erc
en
tage
of
ne
w b
uild
or
ma
jor
refu
rbis
hm
ent p
roje
cts
wh
ich
ach
ieve
"re
ason
ab
le"
ratin
g o
n L
EA
acce
ss a
ud
its (
ba
se
d o
n S
EN
DA
req
uire
me
nts
)
KP
I 2
.4 :
[In
ten
tion
ally
bla
nk, a
s p
er
PF
S te
mp
late
]
KP
I 2
.5 :
Co
nstr
uctio
n q
ua
lity, m
easu
red
by th
e p
erc
en
tage
of
sch
oo
ls c
om
ple
ted
wh
ich
ach
ieve
gra
de
8 o
r m
ore
on
the
Co
nstr
uction
Exce
llen
ce
sca
le o
f 1
-10
(1
0=
Defe
ct F
ree
, 8
so
me
defe
cts
bu
t n
ot
sig
nific
an
t, 5
/6 =
so
me
with
im
pa
ct on
clie
nt,
3 =
ma
jor
defe
cts
)
KP
I 2
.6 –
me
asu
red
an
nu
ally
A-
Page 11
Rochdale
LE
P -
KP
I S
um
mary
Report
Q1
Page 3
of
9
KP
I 2
.7 –
all
BS
F s
cho
ols
co
mp
lete
d
rece
ived
a fu
lly fun
ctio
na
l IC
T s
erv
ice
at
se
rvic
e c
om
me
nce
men
tG
KP
I 2
.8.1
– a
ll scho
ols
co
mp
lete
d t
od
ate
ach
ieved
BR
EE
AM
“V
ery
Goo
d”
[No
te : B
RE
EA
M r
equ
ire
me
nts
are
no
t ap
plic
ab
le to
Sa
xon
Ha
ll]
G
KP
I 2
.8.2
–
on
a
ve
rag
e,
the
liv
e
co
nstr
uction
site
s d
ive
rted
94
% w
aste
fro
m
lan
dfill
du
ring
th
e
rep
ort
ing
pe
riod
A
KP
I 2
.8.3
– m
ea
su
red
an
nu
ally
A-
KP
I 2
.9–
no
lo
st te
ach
ing
ho
urs
rep
ort
ed
du
e t
o c
on
str
uctio
n a
ctivity
G
KP
I 2
.10
.1–
po
licie
s in
pla
ce
and
revie
wed
/ u
pd
ate
d r
eg
ula
rly
G
KP
I 2
.10
.2–
me
asu
red
ann
ua
lly
A-
KP
I 2
.6 :
Ope
ratio
na
l se
rvic
e q
ua
lity,
mea
su
red
by the
agg
rega
te a
nnu
al pa
ym
ent d
ed
uctio
ns a
cro
ss a
ll o
pe
ration
al
sch
oo
ls c
on
tra
cts
as %
of
ma
xim
um
ann
ua
l co
ntr
act
pa
ym
en
ts to
LE
P (
un
ita
ry c
ha
rge
s,
se
rvic
e fee
s e
tc a
s the
ca
se
ma
y b
e)
KP
I 2
.7 :
IC
T infr
astr
uctu
re q
ua
lity,
mea
su
red
by th
ep
erc
en
tage
of
BS
F s
choo
ls th
at
rece
ived
a fu
lly fun
ction
al
ICT
se
rvic
e (
as s
pe
cifie
d)
on
sta
rt o
f op
era
tion
s (
i.e. a
tse
rvic
e c
om
me
nce
men
t)
KP
I 2
.8.1
: E
nviron
men
tal pe
rfo
rman
ce,
mea
su
red
by th
ep
erc
en
tage
of
sch
oo
ls m
ee
ting
or
exce
ed
ing
“V
ery
Goo
d”
sco
re a
ga
inst B
RE
EA
M c
rite
ria
KP
I 2
.8.2
: E
nviron
men
tal pe
rfo
rman
ce
of
con
str
uctio
n, to
be
me
asu
red
pe
r ph
ase
by to
nn
es o
f w
aste
lea
vin
g th
e s
ite
as
pe
rcen
tage
of
tota
l p
rod
uction
ou
tput
an
d a
s %
of
co
nstr
uction
va
lue
KP
I 2
.8.3
: E
nviron
men
tal pe
rfo
rman
ce,
to b
e m
easu
red
by
ene
rgy e
ffic
ien
cy in
ope
ration
KP
I 2
.9 :
Dis
rup
tion
of
scho
ol o
pe
ratio
ns,
mea
su
red
by the
agg
rega
te n
um
be
r of
actu
al te
ach
ing
ho
urs
lost d
ue
to
co
nstr
uction
activity a
s %
of
ag
gre
ga
te n
um
be
r of
pla
nn
ed
tea
ch
ing
hou
rs lo
st du
rin
g the
Wo
rks
KP
I 2
.10
.1 :
To
ad
op
t a
n e
nviro
nm
en
tal an
d s
usta
inab
ility
po
licy th
at
req
uire
s e
ach
ke
y s
up
ply
ch
ain
me
mb
er
to s
et a
ne
nviron
men
tal m
ana
ge
men
t p
lan
fo
r ea
ch
pro
ject
KP
I 2
.10
.2 :
To
me
et
ke
y s
usta
inab
ility
ta
rgets
, m
ea
su
red
by
KP
I 2
.10
.3–
me
asu
red
ann
ua
lly
A-
Page 12
Rochdale
LE
P -
KP
I S
um
mary
Report
Q1
Page 4
of
9
the
am
ou
nt
of
CO
2 e
mitte
d d
uring
th
e c
on
str
uction
pro
ce
ss
KP
I 2
.10
.3 :
To
me
et
ke
y s
usta
inab
ility
ta
rgets
, m
ea
su
red
by
the
am
ou
nt
of
ma
ins w
ate
r co
nsu
med
du
ring
th
e b
uild
KP
I 2
.10
.4 :
To
me
et
ke
y s
usta
inab
ility
ta
rgets
, m
ea
su
red
by
the
am
ou
nt
of
ma
ins w
ate
r co
nsu
med
du
ring
th
e o
pe
ratio
n
KP
I 2
.10
.4–
me
asu
red
ann
ua
lly
A-
KP
I 3
.1 –
Co
mp
lete
G-
KP
I 3
.2–
Co
mp
lete
G-
KP
I 3
.3 –
Kin
gsw
ay P
ark
Hig
h S
cho
ol
fully
co
mp
lete
d w
ith
in the
re
po
rtin
gp
eriod
. T
ota
l m
on
ths f
rom
con
tra
ct
aw
ard
to
op
era
tio
na
l co
mm
en
ce
men
ta
t sch
oo
l =
17
mon
ths (
targ
et
>26
mo
nth
s).
G
KP
I 3
.5 –
Kin
gsw
ay P
ark
Hig
h S
cho
ol
fully
co
mp
lete
d w
ith
in the
re
po
rtin
gp
eriod
. P
erc
en
tag
e d
iffe
rence
be
twe
en
pla
nn
ed
mo
nth
s a
nd
actu
al
mo
nth
s fro
m fin
an
cia
l clo
se
/co
ntr
act
aw
ard
to
se
rvic
e c
om
men
ce
me
nt
=0
% (
pro
ject co
mp
lete
d o
np
rog
ram
me
).
G
To
in
cre
ase t
he e
ffic
ien
cy o
f p
rocu
rin
g n
ew
sch
oo
lsin
fra
str
uc
ture
, in
te
rms
of
pro
cu
rem
en
t ti
me
sc
ale
s a
nd
pre
dic
tab
ilit
y o
f o
utc
om
e
KP
I 3
.1 :
De
ve
lop
me
nt (L
oca
l A
uth
ority
re
qu
est fo
r N
ew
Pro
ject P
rop
osa
l to
App
rova
l of
Sta
ge
1 P
ropo
sa
l),
by
me
asu
rin
g the
ave
rag
e n
um
be
r of
ca
len
da
r m
on
ths (
as a
rolli
ng
ave
rag
e r
oun
de
d u
p to
th
e n
ea
rest
mon
th)
taken
be
twe
en
th
e d
ate
of
the
Lo
ca
l A
uth
ority
re
qu
est fo
r a
Ne
wP
roje
ct
Pro
po
sa
l a
nd
th
e d
ate
of
form
al A
pp
rova
l of
Sta
ge
1P
ropo
sa
l
KP
I 3
.2 :
De
sig
n a
nd
Pro
cu
rem
ent
(Ap
pro
va
l of
sta
ge
1 t
ofin
an
cia
l clo
se
or
aw
ard
of
con
tra
ct)
, b
y m
easu
ring
the
nu
mbe
r of
ca
lend
ar
mo
nth
s (
rou
nd
ed
up
to
the
nea
rest
mo
nth
) ta
ken
be
twe
en
th
e d
ate
of
form
al S
tage
1 a
pp
rova
la
nd
fin
ancia
l clo
se
or
con
tra
ct
aw
ard
KP
I 3
.3 :
De
taile
d d
esig
n &
con
str
uctio
n (fr
om
fin
an
cia
lclo
se
/co
ntr
act a
wa
rd to
ope
ration
al co
mm
en
ce
men
t a
tsch
oo
l),
by m
ea
su
ring
th
e n
um
be
r of
ca
len
da
r m
on
ths
(ro
und
ed
up
to
th
e n
ea
rest
mon
th)
taken
be
twe
en
th
e d
ate
of
fin
an
cia
l clo
se
/con
tra
ct a
wa
rd a
nd
op
era
tion
al
co
mm
en
cem
en
t a
t sch
oo
l
KP
I 3
.4 :
[no
t u
sed
]
KP
I 3
.5 :
Pre
dic
tab
ility
(de
sig
n a
nd
con
str
uction
of sch
oo
l),
me
asu
red
by the
pe
rcen
tage
diffe
ren
ce
be
twe
en
pla
nne
dm
on
ths a
nd
actu
al m
on
ths b
etw
een
fin
an
cia
l clo
se/c
on
tract
KP
I 3
.6–
Kin
gsw
ay P
ark
Hig
h S
cho
ol
fully
co
mp
lete
d w
ith
in the
re
po
rtin
gp
eriod
. P
erc
en
tag
e d
iffe
rence
be
twe
en
pla
nn
ed
mo
nth
s a
nd
actu
al
mo
nth
s fro
m S
tage
1 a
pp
rova
l to
se
rvic
e c
om
me
nce
men
t =
-12
.82
%(p
roje
ct co
mp
lete
d 2
.5 m
on
ths a
hea
d
G
Page 13
Rochdale
LE
P -
KP
I S
um
mary
Report
Q1
Page 5
of
9
of
the
an
ticip
ate
d c
om
ple
tion
da
tein
clu
de
d w
ith
in the
app
rove
d S
tage
1p
ropo
sa
ls).
aw
ard
and
se
rvic
e c
om
men
ce
me
nt
KP
I 3
.6 :
Pre
dic
tab
ility
of
tota
l p
roje
ct,
mea
su
red
by t
he
pe
rcen
tage
diffe
ren
ce
be
twe
en
pla
nn
ed
mon
ths a
nd
actu
al
mo
nth
s b
etw
een
Sta
ge
1 a
pp
rova
l an
d s
erv
ice
co
mm
en
ce
men
t
KP
I 3
.7 :
No
ne
w m
ate
ria
l con
tra
ctu
al de
rog
atio
ns r
ais
ed
tha
tP
fS c
on
sid
er
are
no
t p
roje
ct s
pe
cific
KP
I 3
.7–
Co
mp
lete
G-
KP
I 4
.1–
aw
aitin
g a
pp
rova
l of fina
l
accou
nt figu
res fo
r co
mp
lete
d D
&B
sch
em
es
-
KP
I 4
.2–
Co
mp
lete
G-
KP
I 4
.3–
Co
mp
lete
G-
To
co
ntr
ol
wh
ole
lif
e c
osts
of
BS
F s
ch
oo
ls a
cro
ss t
he
pro
gra
mm
e,
an
d t
o p
rod
uce lo
ng
term
co
st
eff
icie
nc
y
KP
I 4
.1 :
Ave
rage
to
tal co
st
of
co
nstr
uction
, m
ea
su
red
by
me
an
tota
l co
st pe
r m
2, ca
lcu
late
d a
s the
actu
al fin
al to
tal
co
st
(at fin
an
cia
l clo
se
fo
r P
FI, a
t co
mp
letion
fo
r D
&B
Ta
rget
Co
st)
fo
r ne
w c
on
str
uction
div
ided
by th
e g
ross flo
or
are
a
KP
I 4
.2 :
Pre
dic
tab
ility
of
initia
l sch
em
e d
esig
n fe
es a
t S
tage
1,
mea
su
red
by the
pe
rcen
tage
diffe
ren
ce
be
twe
en
estim
ate
d a
nd
actu
al fe
es fo
r no
n-s
am
ple
sche
mes b
etw
ee
nco
mm
en
ce
men
t a
nd
app
rova
l un
de
r S
tage
1K
PI 4
.4–
me
asu
red
an
nu
ally
A-
Page 14
Rochdale
LE
P -
KP
I S
um
mary
Report
Q1
Page 6
of
9
KP
I 4
.5.1
– m
ea
su
red
an
nu
ally
A-
KP
I 4
.5.2
– m
ea
su
red
an
nu
ally
A-
KP
I 4
.5.3
– m
ea
su
red
an
nu
ally
A-
KP
I 4
.5.4
– m
ea
su
red
an
nu
ally
A-
KP
I 4
.5.5
– m
ea
su
red
an
nu
ally
A-
KP
I 4
.6–
Co
mp
lete
G-
KP
I 4
.7–
Co
mp
lete
G-
KP
I 4
.3 :
Pre
dic
tab
ility
of
initia
l sch
em
e d
esig
n fe
es f
rom
Sta
ge
1 to
Sta
ge
2,
mea
su
red
by the
pe
rcen
tage
diffe
ren
ce
be
twe
en
estim
ate
d a
nd
actu
al fe
es fo
r no
n-s
am
ple
sche
me
sb
etw
een
Sta
ge
1 a
nd
app
rova
l un
de
r S
tage
2
KP
I 4
.4:
Life
cycle
co
sts
, m
ea
su
red
by lo
ca
l a
ve
rag
e f
or
lifecycle
co
sts
co
mp
are
d to
na
tio
na
l a
ve
rag
e
KP
I 4
.5.1
: F
acili
tie
s m
ana
ge
men
t co
sts
(w
he
re a
pp
lica
ble
),m
ea
su
red
by lo
ca
l ave
rage
of
FM
ma
na
ge
me
nt
an
da
dm
inis
tra
tion
co
sts
pe
r a
nn
um
co
mpa
red
to
na
tion
al
ave
rag
e
KP
I 4
.5.2
: F
acili
tie
s m
ana
ge
men
t co
sts
(w
he
re a
pp
lica
ble
),m
ea
su
red
by lo
ca
l a
ve
rage
of
bu
ildin
g m
ain
tena
nce
co
sts
pe
r a
nn
um
co
mpa
red
to
na
tion
al a
ve
rage
KP
I 4
.5.3
: F
acili
tie
s m
ana
ge
men
t co
sts
(w
he
re a
pp
lica
ble
),m
ea
su
red
by lo
ca
l ave
rage
of
ca
reta
kin
g c
osts
per
ann
um
co
mp
are
d to
na
tion
al a
ve
rage
KP
I 4
.5.4
: F
acili
tie
s m
ana
ge
men
t co
sts
(w
he
re a
pp
lica
ble
),m
ea
su
red
by lo
ca
l ave
rage
of
cle
an
ing
co
sts
pe
r an
nu
mco
mp
are
d to
na
tion
al a
ve
rage
KP
I 4
.5.5
: F
acili
tie
s m
ana
ge
men
t co
sts
(w
he
re a
pp
lica
ble
),m
ea
su
red
by lo
ca
l a
ve
rage
of
utilit
ies c
osts
pe
r ann
um
co
mp
are
d to
na
tion
al a
ve
rage
KP
I 4
.6 :
Pre
dic
tab
ility
of e
xte
rna
l w
ork
s c
osts
, m
ea
su
red
by
the
me
an
va
ria
nce
in
exte
rna
l w
ork
s c
osts
at
Sta
ge
2co
mp
are
d to
Sta
ge
1
KP
I 4
.7 :
Pre
dic
tab
ility
of a
bn
orm
al co
sts
, m
ea
su
red
by th
em
ea
n v
arian
ce
in
abn
orm
al co
sts
at
Sta
ge
2 c
om
pa
red
to
Sta
ge
1
KP
I 4
.8–
Co
mp
lete
G-
Page 15
Rochdale
LE
P -
KP
I S
um
mary
Report
Q1
Page 7
of
9
KP
I 4
.8 :
Pre
dic
tab
ility
of
who
le life
co
sts
, m
ea
su
red
by
Whole
life
co
sts
at
ou
ttu
rn c
om
pa
red
to
Sta
ge
2 a
nd
Sta
ge
1
KP
I 5
.1–
me
asu
red
an
nu
ally
A-
KP
I 5
.2–
me
asu
red
an
nu
ally
A-
Th
e a
ve
rage
pe
rcen
tage
sco
re o
f cu
sto
me
r sa
tisf
actio
nsu
rve
ys, a
s m
ea
su
red
in
acco
rda
nce
with
su
rve
y g
uid
an
ce
(Ke
y r
esp
on
de
nts
: L
EA
/Hea
d T
ea
che
r):
KP
I 5
.1 :
De
sig
n a
nd
pro
cu
rem
ent
ph
ase
KP
I 5
.2 :
Co
nstr
uctio
n p
ha
se
KP
I 5
.3 :
Ope
ratio
na
l ph
ase
KP
I 5
.3–
me
asu
red
an
nu
ally
A-
KP
I 6
.1–
22
wo
rk p
lace
me
nts
de
live
red
du
ring
th
e r
ep
ort
ing
pe
riod
(12
stu
de
nt;
10
ad
ult).
To
tal8
6 p
lace
men
ts d
eliv
ere
d to
30
Ju
ne
20
13
(46
stu
den
t; 4
0 a
du
lt)
A
To
red
uce a
du
lt w
ork
lessn
es
s;
To
decre
ase t
he a
mo
un
to
f ti
me s
pen
t b
y s
ch
oo
ls i
n a
dm
inis
teri
ng
co
ntr
acts
; T
oen
su
re t
he h
igh
est
sta
nd
ard
s o
f ch
ild
pro
tec
tio
n;
To
inc
rea
se
Tra
inin
g a
nd
Wo
rk E
xp
eri
en
ce
Op
po
rtu
nit
ies;
To
en
su
re a
ssis
tan
ce
wit
h p
up
ils' c
are
er
de
ve
lop
me
nt
KP
I 6
.1 :
Off
er
stu
de
nts
wo
rk e
xp
erien
ce
op
po
rtunitie
s a
nd
ma
nag
em
ent
an
d k
no
wle
dg
e a
nd
op
po
rtun
itie
s o
f th
ep
rofe
ssio
ns in
volv
ed
with
th
e p
roje
ct,
by m
ea
su
ring
nu
mbe
rsof
pup
ils p
er
scho
ol p
rovid
ed
with
su
ch
expe
rie
nce
KP
I 6
.2 :
[no
t u
sed
]
KP
I 6
.3–
0 job
opp
ort
un
itie
s c
rea
ted
To
tal 6
1 job
s c
rea
ted
to
30
Jun
e 2
013
A
Page 16
Rochdale
LE
P -
KP
I S
um
mary
Report
Q1
Page 8
of
9
KP
I 6
.4–
all
BS
F c
on
tract
ad
min
istr
ation
man
ag
ed
by th
e L
EP
and
site
te
am
sG
KP
I 6
.5–
no
fa
ilure
s to
ca
rry o
ut
CR
Bch
ecks id
en
tifie
d
G
KP
I 6
.6–
8 a
pp
rentice
sh
ip
pla
ce
me
nts
cre
ate
d d
uring
the
rep
ort
ing
pe
rio
dT
ota
l 84
ap
pre
ntice
sh
ip p
lace
me
nts
cre
ate
d to
30
Jun
e 2
013
A
KP
I 6
.3 :
Nu
mbe
r of
op
po
rtun
itie
s fo
r e
mp
loym
en
t, m
ea
sure
db
y n
um
be
rs o
f ad
ults p
rovid
ed
with
su
ch
exp
erience
opp
ort
un
ity
KP
I 6
.4 :
Co
ntr
act A
dm
inis
tra
tio
n, m
ea
su
red
by a
ve
rage
nu
mbe
r of
ho
urs
pe
r w
ee
k s
pen
t b
y s
choo
l sta
ff in
BS
F-
rela
ted
ad
min
istr
ation
KP
I 6
.5 :
CR
B c
he
cks,
mea
su
red
by n
um
be
r of
failu
res to
ca
rry o
ut
CR
B c
he
cks in
acco
rda
nce
with
ob
liga
tion
s o
f LE
Pa
nd
Su
pp
ly C
ha
in in
de
live
ring
co
ntr
acts
KP
I 6
.6 :
To
und
ert
ake
a tra
inin
g p
rog
ram
me
em
plo
yin
ga
pp
rentice
s w
ith a
vie
w to
ach
ieve
a m
inim
um
NV
Q L
2
KP
I 6
.7 :
To
pro
vid
e le
arn
ing
an
d c
are
ers
info
rma
tio
n,
me
asu
red
by the
nu
mbe
r of
ho
urs
pro
vid
ed
KP
I 6
.7–
5 h
ou
rs o
f ca
ree
rs s
upp
ort
pro
vid
ed
To
tal 4
65
.5 h
ou
rs t
o 3
0 J
une
20
13
A
KP
I 7
.1–
0 R
IDD
OR
S d
uri
ng
th
e
rep
ort
ing
pe
rio
d
G
To
main
tain
a h
igh
safe
ty r
ec
ord
in
co
nstr
ucti
on
; T
ocre
ate
ex
ten
de
d s
ch
oo
ls a
nd
to
im
pro
ve a
nd
en
co
ura
ge
use o
f sch
oo
ls f
ac
ilit
ies b
y t
he c
om
mu
nit
y;
To
in
cre
ase
the p
op
ula
rity
of
loca
l sch
oo
ls
KP
I 7
.1 :
Safe
ty,
mea
su
red
by the
nu
mbe
r of
rep
ort
ab
lea
ccid
en
ts p
er
yea
r (t
he
Accid
en
t In
cid
en
ce
Ra
te)
KP
I 7
.2 :
Co
mm
un
ity u
se
of
scho
ols
, m
easu
red
by m
ean
nu
mbe
r of
ho
urs
tha
t B
SF
scho
ols
with
in a
LE
P a
re a
ctu
ally
used
fo
r no
n-s
ch
oo
l a
ctivitie
s c
om
pa
red
with
pre
dic
tio
n in
OB
C o
r re
leva
nt S
tage
1 d
eve
lop
me
nt
KP
I 7
.2–
all
ou
r sche
me
s a
re
de
sig
ned
to
su
pp
ort
in
cre
ase
dco
mm
un
ity u
se
. A
ctu
al le
ve
ls o
fco
mm
un
ity u
se a
re d
ete
rmin
ed
by
ea
ch
sch
oo
l an
d c
om
mun
ity u
se
da
tais
he
ld a
t in
div
idua
l sch
oo
l le
ve
l*
See
Pe
rfo
rma
nce
Re
po
rt
A-
Page 17
Rochdale
LE
P -
KP
I S
um
mary
Report
Q1
Page 9
of
9
KP
I 7
.3 :
Pop
ula
rity
of
loca
l sch
oo
ls,
me
asu
red
by a
nn
ua
lre
vie
w o
f pu
pil
nu
mb
ers
atte
nd
ing
sch
oo
ls b
enefittin
g fro
mB
SF
inve
stm
ent
KP
I 7
.3–
to b
e r
evie
we
d a
ga
in w
he
n
Se
pt 1
3 fig
ure
s a
re a
va
ilab
le.
A-
KP
I 8
.1 :
To
en
sure
tha
t B
SF
co
mm
its to
de
live
ring
lo
ca
ljo
bs, m
ea
su
red
by t
rackin
g a
nd
re
po
rt th
e %
ag
e o
f th
e to
tal
co
nstr
uction
pa
cka
ge
s s
pen
d b
y v
alu
e w
ith
lo
ca
l su
pp
liers
with
in th
e B
oro
ug
h o
f R
och
da
le o
n the
sa
mp
le s
cho
ols
KP
I 8
.1–
du
ring
Q1
an
ad
ditio
na
l£
0.3
1m
wa
s s
pen
t w
ith
in the
Ro
chd
ale
bo
roug
h p
ostc
ode
, b
rin
gin
gth
e o
ve
rall
tota
l to
£1
1.4
6m
(1
2.8
% o
fth
e tota
l co
nstr
uctio
n v
alu
e)
A
Page 18