prop aa vehicle registration fee project information form · partner agencies: please list partner...

Prop AA Vehicle Registration FeeProject Information Form

of 3

Project Name:

Implementing Agency:

Project Location:

Supervisorial District(s):Project Manager:Phone Number:Email:

Brief Project Description for MyStreetSF (50 words max):

Detailed Scope (may attach Word document): Please describe the project scope, benefits, coordination with other projects in the area (e.g. paving, MuniForward, Vision Zero), and how the project would meet the Prop AA screening and prioritization criteria as well as other program goals (e.g., short-term project delivery to bring tangible benefits to the public quickly). Please describe how this project was prioritized. Please attach maps, drawings, photos of current conditions, etc. to support understanding of the project.

Prior Community Engagement/Support (may attach Word document): Please reference any community outreach that has occurred and whether the project is included in any plans (e.g. neighborhood transportation plan, corridor improvement study, station area plans, etc.).

Partner Agencies: Please list partner agencies and identify a staff contact at each agency.

Type of Environmental Clearance Required:

Greenwich Gate

This project is covered by the Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the Presidio Trails & Bikeways Master Plan (July 2003).

Presidio Trust

Kristin Maravilla(415) [email protected]

See Word document.

See Word document.

The Trust had a preliminary meeting with Mike Sallaberry in the Livable Streets Division of SFMTA. Project information has also been shared with MUNI planners at SFMTA, including Julie Kirschbaum, Sean Kennedy, Kevin Keck and Matt Brill.

Greenwich/Lyon Intersection & Presidio Promenade between Greenwich Gate and Lombard/Letterman intersection.

Create a new gate for pedestrians and cyclists at the intersection of Greenwich and Lyon Streets at the site of an historic opening in the Presidio boundary wall. Build 535 linear feet of multi-use trail between the Greenwich Gate and Lombard/Letterman intersection.

2

mailto:[email protected]


of 3

Project Delivery Milestones Status Work

Phase* % CompleteIn-house,

Contracted, or Both

Quarter Calendar Year Quarter Calendar Year

Planning/Conceptual Engineering (typically 30% design) 100% in-house Nov 2015 Dec 2016

Environmental Studies (PA&ED) 100% in-houseDesign Engineering (PS&E) 0% contracted July 2017 Feb 2018Right-of-way N/AAdvertise Construction 0% N/A April 2018 N/A N/AStart Construction (e.g. Award Contract) 0% contracted July 2018 N/A N/A

Open for Use N/A N/A N/A N/A Oct-Dec 2018

Comments

Start Date End Date

*Only design engineering (PS&E) and construction (including related procurement) phases are eligible for Prop AA funds.


of 3

Project Name:

PROJECT COST ESTIMATEPhase Cost Prop AA Prop K Other

Planning/Conceptual Engineering $10,000 N/A $0 $10,000Environmental Studies (PA&ED) $0 N/A $0 $0Design Engineering (PS&E) $187,425 $50,000 $0 $137,425Right-of-way $0 N/A $0 $0Construction $707,672 $200,000 $0 $507,672

TOTAL PROJECT COST $905,097 $250,000 $0 $655,097Percent of Total 28% 0% 72%

17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Total

Design Engineering (PS&E) $50,000 $50,000Construction $200,000 $200,000

TOTAL BY FISCAL YEAR $50,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000*The 2017 Strategic Plan will program funds in FYs 2017/18 to 2021/22. Cash flow can extend beyond this period.

FUNDING PLAN FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PHASES - ALL SOURCES

Funding Source Planned Programmed Allocated TOTAL

Prop AA $250,000 $250,000Presidio Trust / Federal Lands Transporta $655,097 $655,097

$0TOTAL $905,097 $0 $0 $905,097

Comments/Concerns

Greenwich Gate

PROP AA EXPENDITURES BY FISCAL YEAR (CASH FLOW)*

Presidio Trust

TBD Consultants

TBD Consultants

The Trust has requested $50,000 in FY17/18 and $200,000 in FY18/19, but is flexible regarding cash flow by year. The cost estimate developed by TBD Consultants has been escalated by 5% to reflect construction in 2018 rather than 2017.

Funding Source by PhaseSource of Cost Estimate

Desired Prop AA Programming Year

Fiscal Year 2017/18

1

Greenwich Gate

Proposed Improvement

Much of the 2.1-mile Presidio Promenade multi-use trail connecting the Golden Gate Bridge to the

Greenwich gate has been completed, the 535 feet east of the Letterman/Lombard intersection is one of

the few remaining segments. 1

As shown in the attached drawings, the proposed project would create a new gate for pedestrians and

bicyclists at Greenwich Street and build the easternmost 535 feet of the Presidio Promenade multi-use

trail. The project would include crosswalks and other crossing improvements at Greenwich Street, Ruger

Street and Letterman Drive.

Pedestrians entering or leaving the Presidio through the Greenwich Street gate would experience fewer

conflicts with vehicles compared to the Lombard gate. A new gate at Greenwich Street would also be

more direct for Presidio residents, visitors and employees walking to/from the MUNI 41 and 45 routes,

which terminate on Lyon Street immediately south of Greenwich Street. Cyclists could enter the Presidio

directly from San Francisco Bike Route 6 on Greenwich Street. Many pedestrians and bicyclists could

avoid the busy Lombard/Lyon intersection at the Lombard gate, improving safety for pedestrians and

bicyclists and improving the operation of the all-way stop intersection for both vehicular traffic and

transit (PresidiGo and MUNI 43).

1 Another current gap in the trail, near the National Cemetery, is associated with Presidio Parkway reconstruction. Presidio Parkway construction activities are expected to be completed over the next year, allowing for closure of this trail gap. There is also a short segment through the Main Post district where users are redirected to sidewalks and Class II bike lanes.

REMAINING 535-LF SEGMENT OF

PRESIDIO PROMENADE MULTI-USE TRAIL

TERMINAL OF MUNI 41 & 45 ROUTES

2

The planned gate would reestablish an opening in the wall at Greenwich Street, but at approximately

half the width of the 26’ historic opening. The gate opening would be just wide enough to

accommodate an 8’ wide path with 2’ wide shoulders. See photo and illustration below.

PROPOSED OPENING

HISTORIC OPENING

3

Current Traffic Conditions

The Presidio is bounded by an historic wall with a limited number of gates. The Lombard gate is one of

the busiest gates, typically carrying 15 to 20 percent of the daily vehicle traffic into and out of the park

each day. The Presidio Trust operates a vehicle/bicycle counter just inside the gate at the intersection of

Lombard and Ruger Street. According to one year of data, the Lombard Gate accommodated

approximately 8,800-10,700 vehicles per day including PresidiGo buses and MUNI buses (43-Masonic

route), as well an average of 300-370 bicyclists per day. Many pedestrians pass through the Lombard

gate as well, and must negotiate the congested Lombard/Lyon intersection.

The Lyon/Greenwich intersection carries less than one-third the volume of vehicles during both

weekday peak hours and the weekend peak hour.

Intersection Vehicular Volume

Lyon/Lombard Lyon/Greenwich

Weekday AM Peak Hour (January 2008) 1,200 319

Weekday PM Peak Hour (January 2008) 1,208 355

Saturday Peak Hour (May 2009) 1,234 387 Source: Intersection turning movement volumes, All Traffic Data.

Lombard Street from Van Ness to Broderick is a part of the Vision Zero High Injury Network. According

to data collected by Vision Zero, there are 27 pedestrian collision injuries per mile compared the

citywide pedestrian collision rate of 4 injuries per mile. The Lombard Street Safety Project is a Vision

Zero Priority Project and is scheduled to begin construction in spring of 2017. Safety improvements

include signal timing adjustments, intersection daylighting, enhanced crosswalk/intersection striping

and sidewalk bulbs.

According to current plans, the Lombard Street Safety Project will not include the two intersection

closest to the Presidio: Baker Street and Lyon Street. According to the Statewide Integrated Traffic

Records System (SWITRS), there were two collisions at the intersection of Lombard and Lyon involving a

pedestrian or cyclist between 2009 and 2015. Presidio Trust’s collision records include a collision

involving a cyclist in the Presidio at the nearby intersection of Lombard and Ruger Street. Building the

remaining portion of Presidio Promenade and the Greenwich Gate would allow cyclists and pedestrians

to avoid these busy intersections on Lombard Street. Combined with the Vision Zero project along

Lombard Street, the Greenwich Gate project would help improve pedestrian conditions in this corridor.

Lombard Gate Average Daily Counts December 1st 2015 – November 30th 2016

Weekday Weekend

Total Vehicles 10,723 8,787

Cars & Trucks 10,464 8,240

MUNI 189 139

PresidiGo 70 40

Bicyclists 306 368

4

Prior Community Engagement/Support

The Greenwich Gate and Presidio Promenade multi-use trail are part of the Presidio Trails and Bikeways

Master Plan (July 2003), and associated Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact

(http://www.presidio.gov/presidio-trust/planning/Shared%20Documents/Planning%20Documents/PLN-

344-PresidioTrailsEa_200307.pdf). Because the Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the Presidio

Trails and Bikeways Master Plan addressed this project, environmental compliance is complete.

Some individuals expressed support for the Greenwich Gate project during the public participation

phase of the Presidio Trails and Bikeways Master Plan, but members of the Cow Hollow neighborhood

expressed concern about the gate design being wide enough to accommodate transit with minimal

modification.2 The Presidio Trust has no interest in accommodating any sort of vehicular traffic through

this gate, and has subsequently altered the design to narrow the proposed opening in response to

neighborhood feedback. The Presidio has several other pedestrian gates, and has no intention of

opening any of them for vehicular traffic. If funding is approved for the project, the Trust will reengage

the community for feedback on the revised design.

2 The previous design restored the opening to the historic width of 26 feet with a landscaped median island at the opening.

http://www.presidio.gov/presidio-trust/planning/Shared%20Documents/Planning%20Documents/PLN-344-PresidioTrailsEa_200307.pdf

http://www.presidio.gov/presidio-trust/planning/Shared%20Documents/Planning%20Documents/PLN-344-PresidioTrailsEa_200307.pdf

Prepared For :

111 Pine Street The Presidio Trust

Suite 1315 103 Montgomery Street

San Francisco San Francisco

CA, 94111 CA 94129-0052

January 13, 2016

The Presidio Trust

Greenwich Gate

New Gate and Pathway

Presidio of San Francisco

Conceptual Cost Estimate

The Presidio Trust New Gate and Pathway

Greenwich Gate Conceptual Cost Estimate

BASIS OF ESTIMATE

REFERENCE DOCUMENTATION

Document Date

18-Dec-15

BASIS FOR PRICING

CONTINGENCY

Design Contingency 10%

Construction Contingency 5%

This cost estimate is based on standard industry practice, professional experience and knowledge of the local construction

market costs. TBD Consultants have no control over the material and labor costs, contractors methods of establishing prices

or the market and bidding conditions at the time of bid. Therefore TBD Consultants do not guarantee that the bids received

will not vary from this cost estimate.

The Design Contingency is carried to cover scope that lacks definition and scope that is anticipated to be added to the

Design. As the Design becomes more complete the Design Contingency will reduce.

The Construction Contingency is carried to cover the unforeseen during construction execution and Risks that do not

currently have mitigation plans. As Risks are mitigated, the Construction Contingency can be reduced, but should not be

eliminated.

An owners contingency has not been included in this construction cost estimate, The owners contingency is recommended

to cover scope change, bidding conditions, claims and delays.

This Construction Cost Estimate was produced from the following documentation. Design and engineering changes

occurring subsequent to the issue of these documents have not been incorporated in this estimate.

Unless identified otherwise, the cost of such items as overtime, shift premiums and construction phasing are not included in

the line item unit price.

This estimate reflects the fair construction value for this project and should not be construed as a prediction of low bid.

Prices are based on local prevailing wage construction costs at the time the estimate was prepared. Pricing assumes a

procurement process with competitive bidding for all sub-trades of the construction work, which is to mean a minimum of 3

bids for all subcontractors and materials/equipment suppliers. If fewer bids are solicited or received, prices can be expected

to be higher.

Subcontractor's markups have been included in each line item unit price. Markups cover the cost of field overhead, home

office overhead and subcontractor’s profit. Subcontractor's markups typically range from 15% to 25% of the unit price

depending on market conditions.

General Contractor’s/Construction Manager's Site Requirement costs are calculated on a percentage basis. General

Contractor’s/Construction Manager's Jobsite Management costs are also calculated on a percentage basis.

General Contractor’s overhead and fees are based on a percentage of the total direct costs and include general conditions,

contractor’s bond, insurance, site office overheads and profit.

Insurance and bond is broken down as follows:-

General Liability Insurance - 1.5%

Performance Bond - 1%

Greenwich gate Landscape Plans L1, L2 & L3 prepared by The

Presidio Trust

BASIS OF ESTIMATE01/13/2016 Page 1 of 6



BASIS OF ESTIMATE

ESCALATION

EXCLUSIONS

- Land acquisition, feasibility studies, financing costs and all other owner costs

- Items identified in the design as Not In Contract [NIC]

- Pathway Lighting

- Hazardous material testing and/or abatement.

- Soil remediation

- Off site utilities

- Archeological monitoring

Escalation has been included in the estimate to reflect the anticipated increases in labor and materials up until the mid point

of construction. We have assumed that work will be started in Q3 2016.

BASIS OF ESTIMATE01/13/2016 Page 2 of 6



Area of Work (SF): 11,500

SECTIONBASE

ESTIMATE$ / SF COMMENTS

SITE PREPARATION 28,431 2.47

NEW PATHWAY 348,135 30.27

LANDSCAPING 4,918 0.43

WORK OUTSIDE THE PRESIDIO BOUNDARY 20,150 1.75

DIRECT COSTS 401,634 34.92

SITE REQUIREMENTS 12,500 1.09

JOBSITE MANAGEMENT 66,000 5.74 Allow for 12 weeks

ESTIMATE SUB-TOTAL 480,134 41.75

INSURANCE + BONDING 2.5% 12,003 1.04

FEE 10.0% 48,013 4.18


DESIGN CONTINGENCY 10.0% 54,015 4.70

CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY 5.0% 27,008 2.35


ESCALATION 8.5% 52,800 4.59 Assume work will start Q1 2017

ESTIMATE TOTAL 673,973 58.61

PROJECT SOFT COSTS

DESIGN

Architecture 0.67% 4,500 0.39

Structural Engineering 1.78% 12,000 1.04

Mechanical / Electrical Engineering 0.37% 2,500 0.22

Landscape Architecture 4.45% 30,000 2.61

Civil Engineering 7.42% 50,000 4.35

Cost Estimating 1.19% 8,000 0.70

Geotechnical / Survey 1.48% 10,000 0.87

Miscellaneous Services/Consultants 0.96% 6,500 0.57

Design reimbursable expenses 1.19% 8,000 0.70

OTHER

Permit / Plan Check Fees 1.48% 10,000 0.87

Presidio Trust Direct Management Costs 4.45% 30,000 2.61

Testing & Inspection 0.74% 5,000 0.43

Archeological monitoring Excluded

Document reproduction 0.30% 2,000 0.17

EXCLUSIONS

Environmental Studies Excluded

Hazardous material testing or disposal Excluded

TOTAL OF PROJECT SOFT COSTS 178,500 15.52

CONTINGENCY

PROJECT CONTINGENCY 5.0% 42,624 3.71

TOTAL PROJECT COST 895,097 77.83

SUMMARY 01/13/2016 Page 3 of 6



ESTIMATE DETAIL Area of Work (SF): 11,500

1

2 SITE PREPARATION3

4 Demolition

5Demolish section of existing stone wall,

carefully set material aside 25 LF 42.001,050

6Demolish existing concrete retaining wall and

footing 25 LF 55.001,375

7 Sawcut roadway 47 LF 7.00 329

8Breakup and remove section of existing ac

roadway 490 SF 8.003,920

9 Demolish section of existing concrete sidewalk 112 SF 11.00 1,232

10Demolish existing concrete curbs for new curb

cut / ADA crosswalks 2 EA 800.001,600

11 Careful remove existing street light 1 LS 500.00 50012 Demolish existing light pole footing 1 LS 1,200.00 1,20013 Traffic control during demolition work 1 LS 3,500.00 3,50014 Allowance for miscellaneous site demolition 11,500 SF 0.25 2,87515

16 Landscape and Tree Removal17 Remove existing trees 6 EA 850.00 5,10018 Grub up and remove existing site vegetation 11,500 SF 0.15 1,72519

20 Erosion Control

21Allowance for erosion control during

construction11,500 SF 0.35 4,025

22

23 SITE PREPARATION 28,431

24

25 NEW PATHWAY26

27 Excavation & Grading28 Excavate to reduce level at Greenwich Gate 133 CY 65.00 8,645

29Excavate for retaining wall footing (Greenwich

gate)9 CY 125.00 1,125

30Excavate for retaining wall adjoining curb at

Lombard Street49 CY 105.00 5,145

31 Excavate to reduce grade at pathways 68 CY 50.00 3,40032 Dispose of excavated material off site 259 CY 40.00 10,36033 Rough grading 10,455 SF 1.35 14,11434 Imported stone aggregate beneath paving 169 CY 65.00 10,98535 Fine grading at pathways 6,521 SF 1.10 7,17336 Fine grading at landscaped areas 3,934 SF 0.65 2,55737

38 Concrete39 Greenwich Gate Retaining Wall40 Foundation 12 LF 135.00 1,62041 Wall 42 SF 115.00 4,83042 Allowance for drainage / perf pipe 1 LS 500.00 50043 Retaining Wall at Lombard44 Foundation 82 LF 75.00 6,15045 Wall 123 SF 115.00 14,14546 Curbs47 New concrete curb at Lombard crosswalk 58 LF 45.00 2,61048 Concrete Paving49 Concrete paving at Lombard Street 1,488 SF 18.00 26,78450 Concrete Paving at Rugar Street crossing 200 SF 22.00 4,400

51Precast detectable domes, inset in concrete

paving4 EA 650.00 2,600

52 Miscellaneous concrete foundations and pads53 Light Pole Footing 1 EA 1,200.00 1,20054 Bollard Footing 5 EA 450.00 2,25055 Railing Footing 7 EA 200.00 1,40056 Allowance for miscellaneous concrete 1 LS 3,000.00 3,000

COMMENTSDESCRIPTIONREF QUANTITY UoM UNIT RATE TOTAL $

ESTIMATE DETAIL01/13/2016 Page 4 of 6





57

58 Masonry

59

Allowance to repair edges of demolished stone

wall and complete edges returns at new

gateway

1 LS 15,000.00 15,000 Stone wall

60

61 Paving62 Patch AC paving at Rugar 47 SF 10.00 47063 New ac pathway 2,864 SF 8.00 22,91264 Stabilized DG paving border to ac 716 SF 6.00 4,29665 Metal edging 716 LF 6.50 4,65466 New raised crosswalk at Rugar 514 SF 35.00 17,99067

68 Signage & Markings69 Pathway markings 1 LS 2,400.00 2,40070 Road crosswalk markings 2 EA 900.00 1,80071 Markings at Rugar crosswalk 1 LS 1,000.00 1,00072 Allowance for signage 4 EA 600.00 2,40073

74 Site Lighting

75Re-install existing light fixture including re-

routing existing power1 LS 2,200.00 2,200

76

77 Site Utilities

78Allowance to relocate existing utilities at

Lombard Street1 LS 80,000.00 80,000 HV Electrical

79 New culvert at Rugar 15 LF 45.00 67580

81 Railing 82 New galvanized steel railing, painted 127 LF 235.00 29,84583

84 Miscellaneous85 Bollards 5 EA 5,500.00 27,50086 Wayside signage Excluded 87 Benches Excluded 88 Trash / Recycle Receptacles Excluded 89

90 NEW PATHWAY 348,135






91

92 LANDSCAPING93

94 Landscaping

95Patch and repair areas of landscape and

irrigation disturbed by new construction3,934 SF 1.25 4,918

96

97 LANDSCAPING 4,918

98

99 WORK OUTSIDE THE PRESIDIO BOUNDARY100

101 Demolition 102 Sawcut existing concrete curbs and pathway 1 LS 1,200.00 1,200103 Demolish section of existing sidewalk and curb 1 LS 3,500.00 3,500104 Remove existing road markings 1 LS 500.00 500105

106 Concrete107 New concrete paving with driveway curb detail 1 LS 11,200.00 11,200108

109 Paving110 Patch existing ac roadway 1 LS 1,400.00 1,400111

112 Signage113 Allowance for signage 1 LS 850.00 850114 Road markings 1 LS 1,500.00 1,500115

116 WORK OUTSIDE THE PRESIDIO BOUNDARY 20,150


January17,2017AmyMarshallTransportationManagerPresidioTrust103MontgomeryStreet,P.O.Box29052SanFrancisco,CA94129Subject:GreenwichGateMulti-UseTrailPropositionAAFundingApplicationDearMs.Marshall,WalkSanFranciscoanditsmembersstrivetomakeSanFranciscoamorelivable,walkablecitybyreclaimingourstreetsassharedpublicspaceforeveryonetoenjoy.Assuch,wearewritingtoexpressoursupportofthePresidioTrust’splantoopenakeyaccesspointtothepark--GreenwichGate.ThisproposedsegmentwillincreaseaccesstoanationaltreasurethatallSanFranciscansarewelcometoenjoybycreatinganewentrywaythatmoredirectlylinkstonearbytransitroutesandaresidentialneighborhood.Theprojectalsoincludeskeyfeaturetoimprovepedestriansafetywhileinsidethepark,withaconnectedmulti-usetrail,raisedcrosswalksandaddedhighvisibilitycrosswalkstofurtherprioritizetheparkasaplaceforrecreation,healthandsustainabletransportation.WalkSanFranciscostronglysupportsthePresidioTrust’seffortstoincreasepedestriansafetyandaccessibilitythroughthisrenovation.Pedestrians,visitors,andSanFranciscoresidentswillbenefitfromthistransformation.Itwillenrichtheareaandthecommunity.WeencouragetheSFCountyTransportationAuthoritytofundthisimportantprojectthroughPropositionAA.Pleasefeelfreetocontactmeforanyadditionalquestionsatnicole@walksf.orgor415-431-9255.

Sincerely,

NicoleFerrara

ExecutiveDirector

San Francisco Bicycle Coalition

1720 Market Street

San Francisco CA 94102

T 415.431.BIKE

F 415.431.2468

sfbike.org

4

1

5

.

4

3

1

.

B

I

K

E

4

1

5

.

4

3

1

.

2

4

6

8

f

a

x

w

w

w

.

s

f

b

i

k

e

.

o

r

g

January 6, 2016 Amy Marshall Transportation Manager Presidio Trust 103 Montgomery Street San Francisco, CA 9412 Re: Greenwich Gate B ike Path Proposition AA Funding Application To Amy Marshall: On behalf of the San Francisco Bicycle Coalition and our 10,000-plus members, I am writing to convey our strong support for your application for funding through the Proposition AA Program for the Greenwich Gate Bike Path Project. With miles of beautiful trails, 433 historic buildings and gorgeous views throughout a total of 1,491 acres of national park land, the Presidio is a true San Francisco treasure. For people who love to explore by bike, the Presidio has premier routes for all types of riders making accessibility by bicycle from the surrounding neighborhoods essential. The Presidio Trails and Bikeways Master Plan and Environmental Assessment, created with input from the SF Bicycle Coalition outlines the planned bike network for the Presidio, which emphasizes accessibility and connectivity within the Presidio for people on bikes. Connections into the Presidio going westbound are few, the main one being Lombard Street, which intersects Lyon Street before entering the Presidio. This intersection is congested for all modes and dangerous for people on bikes, offering only Class II facilities. Biking in San Francisco has grown 184% over the past decade and is the fastest growing mode of transportation in San Francisco. With more and more people entering the Presidio by bike, it is essential that they have a safe point of access. The Greenwich Gate Project would give people biking to the Presidio exactly that. With separated, protected bike infrastructure and a direct connection to the existing bike route on Greenwich, this new gate would make accessing the Presidio safe and convenient for all people biking and walking. We strongly support the Presidio Trust’s proposal for the Greenwich Gate Project and encourage the SFCTA to award funds for this important project.

Sincerely,

Charles Deffarges Community Organizer San Francisco Bicycle Coalition